DOCSLIB.ORG

In Montgomeryand Pulaski Colinties, Virginia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In Montgomeryand Pulaski Colinties, Virginia VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES PUBLICATION 124 THE VALLEY COALFIELD (MISSISSIPPIAN AGE) IN MONTGOMERYAND PULASKI COLINTIES, VIRGINIA Mervin J. Bartholomew and K. Elizabeth Brown COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF MINES, MINERALS, AND ENERGY DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Stanley S. Iohnson, State Geologist CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA t992 VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES PUBLICAfiON 124 THE VALLEY COALFIELD (MISSISSIPPIAN AGE) IN MONTGOMERYAND PULASKI COUNTIES, VIRGINIA Mervin J. Bartholomew and K. Elizabeth Brown COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF MINES, MINERALS, AND ENERGY DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Stanley S. Johnson, State Geologist CHARLOTTES VILLE, VIRGINIA 1992 CONTENTS P*se - -o- Sructural Cloyd Conglomerate Member ..................;. ...........5 Lower member .............6 Upper member....... ........7 Interpretation Cloyd Conglomerat€ Member .........10 Lower member ............10 Upper member .................... ............11 ILLUSTRATIONS Plate l. Geologic map of Devonian and Mississippian stata in Montgomery and Pulaski Counties, Virginia.................in pocket 2. Stratigraphic correlation diagram of coal measures ..........in pocket Figure 1. Structural contour map drawn on top of coal measures ..............2 2. Typical Brallier 3. Closeup of a Chemung Formation fossil-hash bed overlying fine-grained sandstone ........4 4. Typical Chemung Formation 5. Ledge of Cloyd Conglomerate Mernber overlying Chemung sandstone .........6 6. Remnants of the Cloyd 7. 'Red bed" of the Cloyd Conglomerate Member .........................6 8. Typical lithology of the lower member of the Price Formarion ......................7 9. "Sandstone markerbed" and coal 10. The Langhorne coal showing well-developed southeast-dipping cleavage .........................8 11. The Merrimac interval showing bedding within coal ............ .........................8 12. Typical lithology of the upper member of the Price Formarion ......................9 14. Quartz-pebble conglomerate of the upper member of the Maccrady Formation ..................9 15. Stratigraphic column of the hice 16. Interpretive map showing some depositional features of the Price Formation .............. ........................13 TABLE l. Point-count analyses of marine, non-marine and "marker bed" sandstone................ .........1I DEPARTMENT OF MNES, MINERALS, AND ENERGY RICHMOND, VIRGINIA O.Gene Dishner, Director DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOIJRCES CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA Stanley S. Johnson, State Geologist STAI]F Kay T.Ramsey, Executive Secretary RESEARCHBRANCII James F. Conley, Manager INFORMATION SERVICES AND APPLIED GEOLOGY SECTION PI]BLICATIONS SECTION Thomas M. Gathright,II, Section Head Eugene K. Rader, Section Head and E<litor Elizabeth V. M. Campbell, Geologist Senior D. Allen Penick, Jr., Geologist Senior Karen K. Hostettler, Geologist Senior Vemon N. Morris, Cartographic Drafter Assistant David A. Hubbard, Jr., Geologist Senior Roy S. Sites, Geologist Senior ECONOMIC GEOLOGY SECTION Gerald P. Wilkes, Geologist Senior Palmer C. Sweet, Section Head William F. Giannini, Geologist Senior SOUTIIWEST SECTION Jack E. Nolde, Geologist Senior Alfred R. Taylor, Section Head Michael L. Upchurch, Geologist Senior William S. Henika, Geologist Senior James A. Lovett, Geologist Senior GEOLOGIC MAPPING SECTION William W. Whitlock, Geologist Senior C. R. Berquist, Jr., Geologist Senior Nick H. Evans, Geologist Senior John D. lvlarr, Jr., Geologist Senior SUPPORTBRANCH Delores J.Green, Office Manager Lou A. Carter, Office Services Specialist Christopher B. Devan, Librarian Daniel W. Johnson, Housekeeping Worker Charles B. Marshall, Geologist Technician Edwin W. Marshall, Geologist Technician Paige S. Roach, Store Operations Supervisor Copyright 1992 Commonwealth of Virginia Thispublicationisbasedon thebestinformationavailableto thecompilersatthetimeofitscreation. TheVirginiaDivision of Mineral Resources cannot guarantee this publication to be free from errors or inaccuracies, and disclaims responsibility or liability for interpretations or decisions based thereon. Portions of publications may be quoted if credit is given to the authors and the Division of Mineral Resources. CONTENTS P*oe Cloyd Conglomerate Member ..................i. ...........5 Lower member .............6 Upper member....... ........7 Interpretation Cloyd Conglomerate Member Lower member ............10 Upper member ............1I ILLUSTRATIONS Plate l. Geologic map of Devonian and Mississippian strata in Montgomery and Pulaski Counties, Virginia.................in pocket 2. Stratigraphic correlation diagram of coal measures ..........in pocket Figure 1. Structural con0our map drawn on top of coal measures ..............2 2. Typical Brallier 3. Closeup of a Chemung Formation fossil-hash bed overlying fine-grained sandstone ........4 4. Typical Chemung Formation 5. Ledge of Cloyd Conglomerate Member overlying Chemung sandsrone .........6 6. Remnants of the Cloyd *Red 7. bed" of the Cloyd Conglomerate Member .........................6 8. Typical lithology of the lower member of the Price Formation ......................7 9. "Sands0one markerbed" and coal 10. The Langhome coal showing well-developed southeast-dipping cleavage .........................8 11. The Merrimac interval showing bedding within coal ............ .........................8 12. Typical lithology of the upper member of the Price Formarion ......................9 14. Quartz-pebble conglomerate of the upper member of the Maccrady Formation. .................9 15. Stratigraphic column of the Price F 16.InterpretivemapshowingsomedepositionalfeaturesofthePriceFormation TABLE 1. Point-count analyses of marine, non-marine and "marker bed" sandstone.................. .......1I THE VALLEY COALFIELD MISSISSIPPIAN AGE) IN MONTGOMERY AND PULASKI COUNTIES, VIRGINIA Mervin J. Bartholomewl and K. Elizabeth Brown2 ABSTRACT because ofthe potential ofthe coal-bearing strata to serve as a source rock for natural gas beneath the Pulaski thrust sheet. Coal-bearing srata of Mississippian age lie structurally Within a large portion of these two counties the thrust sheet below the Pulaski thrust sheet in Montgomery and Pulaski is gently folded and the coal beneath lies atrelatively shallow counties, Virginia. These coal-bearing strataare found in the depths. This combination ofbroad, open folds beneath a lowerportion of the upper(nonmarine) memberof thePrice thrust surface at shallow depths provides potential for anti- Formation. The lower coal measures, which lie directly clinal orfault-bounded gas traps as well as easy migration of above the lower (marine) member of the Price, are interpreted gas into the anticlinal and fault-bounded structures. as probable lower delta-plain coals, whereas those in the Field work on the coal-bearing strata was begun by M.J. upper portion of the coal measrres appear more like upper Bartholomew during the spring of 1978 in the Blacksburg delta-plain coals. WithinPulaski andMontgomery Counties quadrangle (Bartholomew and Lowry,1979). Between the the coal measures of the upper Price Formation underlie summers of 1979 and,1980 mapping of the coal measures in approximately 150 square miles in an arearoughly bounded the Radford North and Staffordsville quadrangles was com- by Brush, Cloyd and Little Walker Mountains on the north- pletedby Bartholomew assisted by A.P. Schultz, K.E. Brown west; Tract and Draper Mountains on the west; Draper, Ingles andG.R. Ingram. During thesummerandfallof 1980Brown, and Barringer Mountains on the southeast; and a north- Ingram and Bartholomew mapped the coal measures in the trending line from Christiansburg to Brush Mountain on the Long Spur, Whit€ Gate, Pulaski, Newport, and McDonalds east. The coal measures are structurally runcated to the Mill quadrangles. Samples collected during 1980 for geo- southeast and east" respectively, by ttre southeast-dipping chemical evaluation and weathering studies (Ingram, 198 1; Pulaski fault ramp and the east-dipping Pulaski-Caawba Ingram and Rimstidt, 1984) and sections of the coal mea- faultlateralramp. Snucnualcontours generated from limited sures were described (Appendices I & ID for a study of the subsurface data (22 points) suggest the coal measures may environment of deposition of the coal (Brown, 1983). In occuratdepths as greatas -2500 feetin theRadford areaand 1981, five shallow (less than 50 feet) core holes were drilled northward along New River. By contrast the outcrop belts along the southeastern flanks of Brush, Cloyds, and Little ofcoal generally exceed +2000 feet in elevation indicating WalkerMountains (Appendix III). In the spring of 1981 the that structural relief exceeds 4000 feet. Fast of the Pulaski- Department of Geological Science, Virginia Polytechnic Catawba fault lateral ramp the coal measures formed the Institute and State University drilled a shallow core hole footwall glide horizon along which the thrust moved; thus, along the northwestern flank of Price Mountain (Appendix only thin, scatt€red, teclonic wedges of coal are likely !o be III, #6). The Department of Geological Science (funded by found in northeaslern Montgomery County. Virginia Division of Mineral Resources and the U.S. Geo- A line extending from the mouth of Poverty Creek logical Survey) ran two vibroseis lines (Dysart, 1983) across southward to the western end of the Price Mountain window a portion of the Radford North and Blacksburg 7.5-minute appsrs !o mark the locus of importantchanges in sedimen- quadrangles for the Division during the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 5 Resource Preservation
    CHAPTER 5 RESOURCE PRESERVATION INTRODUCTION The citizens of Roanoke County have a strong desire to preserve the quality of the county’s natural, scenic and historic resources. The county’s natural features - including mountains, forests, productive soil, streams, fresh air and wildlife - serve to distinguish the greater Roanoke Valley as a uniquely attractive urban center. Roanoke County citizens recognize that the beauty of the existing natural environment attracts not only businesses and residents to our community but also tourists and sports enthusiasts. County citizens believe that it is essential to maintain the high quality of Roanoke County’s environment while accommodating the pressures for future growth and development. OPEN SPACE During the past twenty-five years, Roanoke County has experienced steady growth. From a population of 53,800 in 1970 that reflects the results of several annexations, the population grew 54 percent to 83,100 in 1995. Future population projections indicate that by the year 2010 the County population will be approximately 87,400. This growth in population and the accompanying shift in demographics - such as an aging population - are changing the traditional rural landscape of the County. New residents require more housing, schools, shopping centers, office buildings, roads, water and sewer facilities and parks and recreational services. The rural landscape is gradually becoming urbanized as a result of this growth. What was once an orchard is now a residential subdivision or a shopping center. What was once a hardwood forest is now an office building or condominium. Between 1982 and 1992 the number of farms in Roanoke County decreased 11 percent from 306 to 272.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Collecting Sites in North Carolina by W
    .'.' .., Mineral Collecting Sites in North Carolina By W. F. Wilson and B. J. McKenzie RUTILE GUMMITE IN GARNET RUBY CORUNDUM GOLD TORBERNITE GARNET IN MICA ANATASE RUTILE AJTUNITE AND TORBERNITE THULITE AND PYRITE MONAZITE EMERALD CUPRITE SMOKY QUARTZ ZIRCON TORBERNITE ~/ UBRAR'l USE ONLV ,~O NOT REMOVE. fROM LIBRARY N. C. GEOLOGICAL SUHVEY Information Circular 24 Mineral Collecting Sites in North Carolina By W. F. Wilson and B. J. McKenzie Raleigh 1978 Second Printing 1980. Additional copies of this publication may be obtained from: North CarOlina Department of Natural Resources and Community Development Geological Survey Section P. O. Box 27687 ~ Raleigh. N. C. 27611 1823 --~- GEOLOGICAL SURVEY SECTION The Geological Survey Section shall, by law"...make such exami­ nation, survey, and mapping of the geology, mineralogy, and topo­ graphy of the state, including their industrial and economic utilization as it may consider necessary." In carrying out its duties under this law, the section promotes the wise conservation and use of mineral resources by industry, commerce, agriculture, and other governmental agencies for the general welfare of the citizens of North Carolina. The Section conducts a number of basic and applied research projects in environmental resource planning, mineral resource explora­ tion, mineral statistics, and systematic geologic mapping. Services constitute a major portion ofthe Sections's activities and include identi­ fying rock and mineral samples submitted by the citizens of the state and providing consulting services and specially prepared reports to other agencies that require geological information. The Geological Survey Section publishes results of research in a series of Bulletins, Economic Papers, Information Circulars, Educa­ tional Series, Geologic Maps, and Special Publications.
    [Show full text]
  • Incident Management Situation Report Thursday July 10, 2003 - 0530 Mdt National Preparedness Level 3
    INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SITUATION REPORT THURSDAY JULY 10, 2003 - 0530 MDT NATIONAL PREPAREDNESS LEVEL 3 CURRENT SITUATION: Initial attack activity was moderate in the Northwest Area and light elsewhere with 159 new fires reported. Three new large fires were reported, one in Western Great Basin and two in the Rocky Mountain Area. Four large fires were contained, one each in Northern Rockies, Rocky Mountain, Southern California and Northwest Areas. Very high to extreme fire indices were reported in Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Oregon, Texas, Utah, Washington and Wyoming. SOUTHWEST AREA LARGE FIRES: ASPEN, Coronado National Forest. A Type 1 Incident Management Team (Oltrogge) is assigned. This fire is in the Pusch Ridge Wilderness Area, 17 miles northeast of Tucson, AZ. Extreme fire behavior was observed on the southwest flank, with uphill runs on steep slopes in heavy brush. Crews are constructing fireline and conducting burn out operations in Ventana and Montrose Canyons with aerial support. ENCEBADO, Taos Northern Pueblos Agency, Bureau of Indian Affairs. A Type 2 Incident Management Team (Raley) is assigned. This fire is in timber and brush, one mile south of Taos Pueblo, NM. Extreme fire behavior was observed; low relative humidity and high temperatures generated torching and crown fire. Crews and dozers are constructing fireline on the east perimeter. Structure protection is in place for 200 residences. DRY LAKE COMPLEX, Gila National Forest. A Fire Use Management Team (Duncan) is assigned. This lightning caused Wildland Fire Use complex, comprised of the Dry Lake, Sycamore, Moonshine and Granny fires, is 27 miles northwest of Silver City, NM.
    [Show full text]
  • Cumberland Gap National Park
    Cumberland Gap Throughout the ages, poets, songwriters, novelists, journal writers, historians and artists have captured the grandeur of the Cumberland Gap. James Smith, in his journal of 1792, penned what is perhaps one of the most poignant descriptions of this national and historically significant landmark: "We started just as the sun began to gild the tops of the high mountains. We ascended Cumberland Mountain, from the top of which the bright luminary of day appeared to our view in all his rising glory; the mists dispersed and the floating clouds hasted away at his appearing. This is the famous Cumberland Gap..." Thanks to the vision of Congress, who in 1940 authorized Cumberland Gap National Historical Park, visitors today can still bask in its beauty and immerse themselves in its rich history. The story of the first doorway to the west is commemorated at the national park, located where the borders of Tennessee, Kentucky, and Virginia meet. Carved by wind and water, Cumberland Gap forms a major break in the formidable Appalachian Mountain chain. First used by large game animals in their migratory journeys, followed by Native Americans, the Cumberland Gap was the first and best avenue for the settlement of the interior of this nation. From 1775 to 1810, the Gap's heyday, between 200,000 and 300,000 men, women, and children from all walks of life, crossed the Gap into "Kentuckee." The Path of Buffalo and Warriors During the 17th century, the American bison, after a 1,100 year hiatus, resumed a migratory pattern into the southeast portions of North America.
    [Show full text]
  • Description of the Hollidaysburg and Huntingdon Quadrangles
    DESCRIPTION OF THE HOLLIDAYSBURG AND HUNTINGDON QUADRANGLES By Charles Butts INTRODUCTION 1 BLUE RIDGE PROVINCE topography are therefore prominent ridges separated by deep SITUATION The Blue Ridge province, narrow at its north end in valleys, all trending northeastward. The Hollidaysburg and Huntingdon quadrangles are adjoin­ Virginia and Pennsylvania, is over 60 miles wide in North RELIEF ing areas in the south-central part of Pennsylvania, in Blair, Carolina. It is a rugged region of hills and ridges and deep, The lowest point in the quadrangles is at Huntingdon, Bedford, and Huntingdon Counties. (See fig. 1.) Taken as narrow valleys. The altitude of the higher summits in Vir­ where the altitude of the river bed is about 610 feet above sea ginia is 3,000 to 5,700 feet, and in western North Carolina 79 level, and the highest point is the southern extremity of Brush Mount Mitchell, 6,711 feet high, is the highest point east of Mountain, north of Hollidaysburg, which is 2,520 feet above the Mississippi River. Throughout its extent this province sea level. The extreme relief is thus 1,910 feet. The Alle­ stands up conspicuously above the bordering provinces, from gheny Front and Dunning, Short, Loop, Lock, Tussey, Ter­ each of which it is separated by a steep, broken, rugged front race, and Broadtop Mountains rise boldly 800 to 1,500 feet from 1,000 to 3,000 feet high. In Pennsylvania, however, above the valley bottoms in a distance of 1 to 2 miles and are South Mountain, the northeast end of the Blue Ridge, is less the dominating features of the landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Insights from Lowtemperature Thermochronometry Into
    TECTONICS, VOL. 32, 1602–1622, doi:10.1002/2013TC003377, 2013 Insights from low-temperature thermochronometry into transpressional deformation and crustal exhumation along the San Andreas fault in the western Transverse Ranges, California Nathan A. Niemi,1 Jamie T. Buscher,2 James A. Spotila,3 Martha A. House,4 and Shari A. Kelley 5 Received 21 May 2013; revised 21 October 2013; accepted 28 October 2013; published 20 December 2013. [1] The San Emigdio Mountains are an example of an archetypical, transpressional structural system, bounded to the south by the San Andreas strike-slip fault, and to the north by the active Wheeler Ridge thrust. Apatite (U-Th)/He and apatite and zircon fission track ages were obtained along transects across the range and from wells in and to the north of the range. Apatite (U-Th)/He ages are 4–6 Ma adjacent to the San Andreas fault, and both (U-Th)/He and fission track ages grow older with distance to the north from the San Andreas. The young ages north of the San Andreas fault contrast with early Miocene (U-Th)/He ages from Mount Pinos on the south side of the fault. Restoration of sample paleodepths in the San Emigdio Mountains using a regional unconformity at the base of the Eocene Tejon Formation indicates that the San Emigdio Mountains represent a crustal fragment that has been exhumed more than 5 km along the San Andreas fault since late Miocene time. Marked differences in the timing and rate of exhumation between the northern and southern sides of the San Andreas fault are difficult to reconcile with existing structural models of the western Transverse Ranges as a thin-skinned thrust system.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Neurotrichus Gibbsii in California with a Range Extension in the Sierra Nevada
    Western North American Naturalist Volume 62 Number 4 Article 12 10-28-2002 Distribution of Neurotrichus gibbsii in California with a range extension in the Sierra Nevada Leslie N. Carraway Oregon State University, Corvallis B. J. Verts Oregon State University, Corvallis J. W. Goertz Ruston, Louisiana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan Recommended Citation Carraway, Leslie N.; Verts, B. J.; and Goertz, J. W. (2002) "Distribution of Neurotrichus gibbsii in California with a range extension in the Sierra Nevada," Western North American Naturalist: Vol. 62 : No. 4 , Article 12. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan/vol62/iss4/12 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Western North American Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Western North American Naturalist 62(4), © 2002, pp. 487–490 DISTRIBUTION OF NEUROTRICHUS GIBBSII IN CALIFORNIA WITH A RANGE EXTENSION IN THE SIERRA NEVADA Leslie N. Carraway1, B.J. Verts1, and J.W. Goertz2 Key words: shrew-mole, Neurotrichus gibbsii, distribution, range extension, California. Published distribution maps for the shrew- Three additional localities from which 4 speci- mole (Neurotrichus gibbsii) in California depict mens were collected were not plotted because widely variable occupied ranges (Figs. 1A–C). of inadequate or contradictory information. In our review of published information on the Because all unplotted localities occurred in species (Carraway and Verts 1991), we chose counties (Humboldt and Marin) containing to use a modification of Hall’s (1981:67, Map other collection sites, we do not believe their 39) distribution map because it was based on deletion was significant.
    [Show full text]
  • Incident Management Situation Report Thursday July 17, 2003 - 0530 Mdt National Preparedness Level 3
    INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SITUATION REPORT THURSDAY JULY 17, 2003 - 0530 MDT NATIONAL PREPAREDNESS LEVEL 3 CURRENT SITUATION: Initial attack activity was moderate in the Northern Rockies, the Northwest, Rocky Mountain, the Southwest and the Southern California Areas, and light elsewhere. Nationally, 225 new fires were reported. Six new large fires were reported, three in the Rocky Mountain Area, and one each in the Northern Rockies, the Southwest, and Southern California Areas. Five large fires were contained, one each in the Western Great Basin, the Eastern Great Basin, the Southwest, the Southern California and the Northwest. Very high to extreme fire indices were reported in Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Hawaii, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Oregon, Texas, Utah, Washington and Wyoming. SOUTHWEST AREA LARGE FIRES: KINISHBA, Fort Apache Agency, Bureau of Indian Affairs. Type 1 Incident Management Team (Humphrey) is assigned. This fire is in ponderosa pine, woodlands and chaparral, two miles west of Whiteriver, AZ. Due to high winds active fire behavior with torching and spotting was observed. Crews are constructing indirect containment lines and conducting burn out operations. The communities of Cradlebroad, Over the Rainbow, Jurassic Park and Whiteriver have been evacuated. Structure protection is in place for 700 threatened residences. SPRUCE COMPLEX, Gila National Forest. A Type 2 Incident Management Team (Bateman) is assigned. This complex is composed of the Spruce, Silver, Nabours, and Parallel fires and is in brush, ponderosa pine and mixed conifer, nine miles east of Glenwood, NM. All fires remain active within the complex. MOLINA COMPLEX, Santa Fe National Forest. A Type 2 Incident Management Team (Philbin) has been ordered.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire Season 2003
    2003 (Cherry Creek Fire) Overview The San Juan Hotshots formed in 2002 as one of 93 IHC crews in the nation. We are located in Durango, Colorado at Engineer Guard Station. The San Juan IHC is based at 9210 feet and are proud to be the highest based IHC in the nation. The 2003 season was busier than average taking the crew to Wyoming, Idaho, and Oregon. This report gives an overview of the 2003 season covering topics such as the hiring, assignments, training, safety, and fires. Hiring The year started off with five new seasonal faces in addition to the two new squad bosses Dave Pearce and Courtney Madigan. The crew also hired Jesse Jones, Ryder Jones, and Cannon Shockley as lead crewmembers. (Brush Mountain Fire) Assignments The crew started May 5, 2003 and ended October 17, 2003. The crew started off with its usual two weeks of mandatory training. It included long hours of PT, multiple classes, and an overnight field exercise. The season started off with a few small fires on the San Juan N.F. Arizona’s fire season started up and we spent our first full dispatch in region three. After the Picture fire and Thomas fire we returned to Colorado for a few small fires including the Beaver fire. We were not on the fire very long but most of the crewmembers will remember it because of the erratic cotton fires that would run across our line and later dozer line. Every day the aspen trees would drop a large amount of aspen seed, and the fire would cross our line due to burning aspen seed spreading across.
    [Show full text]
  • Expanded View
    Cumberland Gap PATHWAY TO A LAND OF MIST AND MYSTERY Cumberland Gap National Historical Park 91 Bartlett Park Road Middlesboro, Kentucky 40965 www.nps.gov/cuga Published by Eastern National, copyright 2016 Eastern National promotes the public’s understanding and support of America’s national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products, and services. Visit us at www.eParks.com. Photographs by Harold L. Jerrell Cumberland Gap PATHWAY TO A LAND OF MIST AND MYSTERY Cumberland Gap National Historical Park 91 Bartlett Park Road Middlesboro, Kentucky 40965 www.nps.gov/cuga Published by Eastern National, copyright 2016 Eastern National promotes the public’s understanding and support of America’s national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products, and services. Visit us at www.eParks.com. Photographs by Harold L. Jerrell Climb the mountains and get their good tidings. Nature’s peace will flow into you as sunshine flows into trees. The winds will blow their own freshness into you, and the storms their energy, while cares will drop off like autumn leaves. - John Muir Introduction Cumberland Gap National Historical Park is a place we go to contem- plate, relax, connect with nature, enjoy beautiful scenery, and make memories. It is a place that allows us to listen to the quiet, to think, to pay attention to the details of life, and to find renewal. Visits to spe- cial places like the Pinnacle Overlook, Hensley Settlement, and Gap Cave, a hike along the Wilderness Road, or perhaps a trip to the iconic White Rocks, provide incredible opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Broadband Assessment Montgomery County, Virginia
    Broadband Assessment Montgomery County, Virginia Includes City of Radford and Towns of Christiansburg and Blacksburg Final Report May 11, 2020 Prepared by and 1 Table of Contents 2 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... 3 3 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Project Area ............................................................................................................................ 6 3.2 Deliverables ........................................................................................................................... 7 3.3 Methodology ........................................................................................................................... 7 4 County Needs ................................................................................................................................... 9 5 Identification of Communities ............................................................................................... 10 5.1 Prioritization of Communities ...................................................................................... 11 Methodology ................................................................................................................................................. 11 6 Capital Cost Estimate ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Brush Mountain Properties Concept Plan Table of Contents
    BRUSH MOUNTAIN PROPERTIES CONCEPT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .......................................................................................... 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................ 4 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................... 6 Project Background ......................................................................................................................... 6 How this Plan Was Developed ..................................................................................................... 8 Plan Philosophy and Core Values ............................................................................................... 8 Plan Goals and Objectives ............................................................................................................. 9 Plan Prioritization .......................................................................................................................... 10 Role of the Plan .............................................................................................................................. 10 Plan Assumptions .......................................................................................................................... 10 Plan Organization .......................................................................................................................... 11 Plan Implementation ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]