Masters of a Universal Tool
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Report on the Radionet3 Networking Activity
REPORT ON THE RADIONET3 NETWORKING ACTIVITY TITLE: LOFAR SCIENCE WEEK 2014 A JOINT MEETING COMBINING THE “2014 LOFAR COMMUNITY SCIENCE WORKSHOP” AND A SEPARATE, RELATED SYMPOSIUM ON “FIRST SCIENCE WITH LOFAR’S FIRST ALL-SKY SURVEY” DATE: 7 APRIL – 11 APRIL 2014 TIME: ALL DAY LOCATION: AMSTERDAM, THE NETHERLANDS MEETING WEBPAGE http://www.astron.nl/lofarscience2014/ HOST INSTITUTE: ASTRON (NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE FOR RADIO ASTRONOMY) PARTICIPANTS NO: 105 (COMMUNITY WORKSHOP) / 62 (SURVEY WORKSHOP) MAIN LEADER: ASTRON Project supported by the European Commission Contract no.: 283393 REPORT: 1. Agenda of the meeting The final programmes for both of the workshops are reproduced in their entirety in Appendix A. The programs and presentations are also available from the conference website. 2. Scientific Summary The LOFAR Science Week for 2014 was held April 7-11, 2014 in Amsterdam, NL and brought together roughly 120 members of the LOFAR science community. The week began on Monday afternoon with a LOFAR Users Meeting, open to the whole LOFAR community, organized by ASTRON and intended to provide a forum for users to both learn about the status of the array as well as provide feedback. Members of ASTRON gave updates on the current operational status, ongoing developments, and plans for the coming year. Representative users from the community were also invited to share their personal experiences from using the system. Robert Pizzo and the Science Support team were on hand to answer questions and gathered a lot of good feedback that they will use to improve the user experience for LOFAR. The User’s Meeting was followed on Tuesday by a two day LOFAR Community Science Workshop where nearly 120 members of the LOFAR collaboration came together to present their latest science results and share ideas and experiences about doing science with LOFAR. -
Planck 2011 Conference the Millimeter And
PLANCK 2011 CONFERENCE THE MILLIMETER AND SUBMILLIMETER SKY IN THE PLANCK MISSION ERA 10-14 January 2011 Paris, Cité des Sciences Monday, January 10th 2011 13:00 Registration 14:00 Claudie Haigneré (Présidente of Universcience) Welcome Planck mission status, Performances, Cross-calibration Jan Tauber (ESA) - Jean-Loup Puget (IAS Orsay) - Reno Mandolesi (INAF/IASF Bologna) Introduction Session chair: François Pajot 14:20 François Bouchet (Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris) 30+5' HFI data and performance (invited on Planck early paper) 14:55 Marco Bersanelli (University of Milano) 30+5' LFI data and performance (invited on Planck early paper) 15:30 Ranga Chary (IPAC Caltech) 30+5' Planck Early Release Compact Source Catalogue (invited on Planck early paper) 16:05 Coffee break 16:30 Goran Pilbratt (European Space Agency) 20+5' The Herschel observatory (invited) Radio sources 16:55 Bruce Partridge (Haverford College) 25+5' Overview (invited) 17:25 Luigi Tofolatti (Universidad de Oviedo) 20+5' Planck radio sources statistics (invited on Planck early paper) 17:50 Francisco Argueso (Universidad de Oviedo) 15+5' A Bayesian technique to detect point sources in CMB maps 18:10 Anna Scaife (Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies) 15+5' The 10C survey of Radio Sources - First Results 18:30 End of day 1 19:00 Welcome reception at the Conference Center Tuesday, January 11th 2011 Radio sources (continued) Session chair: Bruce Partridge 9:00 Anne Lahteenmaki (Aalto University Metsahovi Radio Observatory) 20+5' Planck observations of extragalactic radio -
The Robotic Preschool of the Future: New Technologies for Learning and Play
The Robotic Preschool of the Future: New Technologies for Learning and Play Walter Dan Stiehl, Angela Chang, Ryan Wistort, and Cynthia Breazeal MIT Media Lab 20 Ames St, E15-468 Cambridge, MA 02139 USA +1 617 452 5605 [email protected], ABSTRACT enhance the magic of play. Technology can add elements of magic to play and learning BACKGROUND and improve communication between students in and out of Unfortunately, in many of today’s educational reading toys the classroom. Robots, as a powerful, multi-modal, the child is simply a passive listener and not an active embodied technology pose a unique benefit to enhancing participant. Such systems lack the ability to sense if the collaborative play and storytelling. In this paper we child does not pay attention and there is no feedback to the present three technologies currently in development in the device to encourage the child’s active participation. Personal Robots Group at the MIT Media Lab and describe scenarios in which these systems can be combined to Recently, robotic devices, such as Lego Mindstorms, have enhance the preschool experience. been created based upon Papert’s Constructionism idea. While these systems have been shown to be beneficial to Keywords young children [3], the form factor of blocks lends itself Robotic companion, pre-school, education more to vehicles than soft characters. Additionally, the INTRODUCTION focus of the interaction is more to teach the foundations of Fantasy play and storytelling have been shown to be vitally programming to accomplish a task as opposed to free form important to learning, especially in young children [1]. -
CHAPTER 6: Diversity in AI
Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2021 CHAPTER 6: Diversity in AI Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2021 CHAPTER 6 PREVIEW 1 Artificial Intelligence CHAPTER 6: Index Report 2021 DIVERSITY IN AI CHAPTER 6: Chapter Preview Overview 3 New Computing PhDs in the Chapter Highlights 4 United States by Race/Ethnicity 11 CS Tenure-Track Faculty by Race/Ethnicity 12 6.1 GENDER DIVERSITY IN AI 5 Black in AI 12 Women in Academic AI Settings 5 Women in the AI Workforce 6 6.3 GENDER IDENTITY AND Women in Machine Learning Workshops 7 SEXUAL ORIENTATION IN AI 13 Workshop Participants 7 Queer in AI 13 Demographics Breakdown 8 Demographics Breakdown 13 Experience as Queer Practitioners 15 6.2 RACIAL AND ETHNIC DIVERSITY IN AI 10 APPENDIX 17 New AI PhDs in the United States by Race/Ethnicity 10 ACCESS THE PUBLIC DATA CHAPTER 6 PREVIEW 2 Artificial Intelligence CHAPTER 6: OVERVIEW Index Report 2021 DIVERSITY IN AI Overview While artificial intelligence (AI) systems have the potential to dramatically affect society, the people building AI systems are not representative of the people those systems are meant to serve. The AI workforce remains predominantly male and lacking in diversity in both academia and the industry, despite many years highlighting the disadvantages and risks this engenders. The lack of diversity in race and ethnicity, gender identity, and sexual orientation not only risks creating an uneven distribution of power in the workforce, but also, equally important, reinforces existing inequalities generated by AI systems, reduces the scope of individuals and organizations for whom these systems work, and contributes to unjust outcomes. -
Speaker Suan Gregurick
NIH’s Strategic Vision for Data Science: Enabling a FAIR-Data Ecosystem Susan Gregurick, Ph.D. Associate Director for Data Science Office of Data Science Strategy February 10, 2020 Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease is a significant cause of death in the US, genetic and Genetic & dietary data are available that could be used to dietary effects in further understand their effects on the disease Separate studies have been Challenges COPD done to collect genomic and dietary data for subjects with Obtaining access to all the COPD. relevant datasets so they can be analyzed Researchers know that many of the same subjects participated Understanding consent for in the two studies. each study to ensure that data usage limitations are respected Linking these datasets together would allow them to examine Connecting data from the the combined effects of same subject across genetics and diet using the different datasets so that the subjects present in both studies. genetic and dietary data from However, different identifiers the same subjects can be were used to identify the linked and studied subjects in the different studies. Icon made by Roundicons from www.flaticon.com DOC research requires datasets from a wide variety Dental, Oral and of sources, combining dental record systems with clinical and research datasets, with unique Craniofacial challenges of facial data (DOC) Research Advances in facial imaging Challenges have lead to rich sources of imaging and Joining dental and quantitative data for the clinical health records in craniofacial region. In order to integrate datasets addition, research in from these two parts of the model organisms can health system support DOC research in humans. -
Probing Galaxy Halos Using Background Polarized Radio Sources
Probing galaxy halos using background polarized radio sources Master’s thesis in Physics and Astronomy ANTON NILSSON Department of Earth and Space Sciences CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Gothenburg, Sweden 2016 Probing galaxy halos using background polarized radio sources Anton Nilsson Department of Earth and Space Sciences Radio Astronomy and Astrophysics group Chalmers University of Technology Gothenburg, Sweden 2016 Probing galaxy halos using background polarized radio sources Anton Nilsson © Anton Nilsson, 2016. Supervisor: Cathy Horellou, Department of Earth and Space Sciences Examiner: Cathy Horellou, Department of Earth and Space Sciences Department of Earth and Space Sciences Radio Astronomy and Astrophysics group Chalmers University of Technology SE-412 96 Gothenburg Telephone +46 31 772 1000 Cover: Polarized emission of the radio source J133920+464115 at Faraday depth +20.75 rad m−2 in grayscale. The contours show the total intensity. Typeset in LATEX Printed by Chalmers Reproservice Gothenburg, Sweden 2016 iv Probing galaxy halos using background polarized radio sources Anton Nilsson Department of Earth and Space Sciences Chalmers University of Technology Abstract Linearly polarized radio emission from synchrotron sources undergoes Faraday ro- tation when passing through a magneto-ionized medium. This might be used to search for evidence of ionized halos around galaxies, using polarized radio sources as a probe. In this thesis I analyze the polarization properties of background radio sources from the Taylor et al. (2009) catalog based on observations with the Very Large Array, and correlate these to the angular separation between the radio sources and foreground galaxies. I find a decrease in the amount of polarized radio sources near the galaxies, interpreting this as radio sources being depolarized by galaxy halos. -
OTFM for Fast Mapping & Rapid Data Products
OTFM for fast mapping & rapid data products Steven T. Myers (NRAO) for the VLASS team 1 B&E Caltech July 2016 The VLA Sky Survey (VLASS) On-the-fly Mosaicking (OTFM) for efficient fast mapping of the sky and pipelines for rapid genera=on of Data Products … wherein we elucidate the sundry benefits of using the recently upgraded Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array to survey large areas of the sky to discover new transient phenomena and illuminate heretofore hidden explosions throughout the Universe, and to explore cosmic magnetism h0ps://science.nrao.edu/science/surveys/vlass 2 B&E Caltech July 2016 Why a new VLA Sky Survey? A New VLA deserves a New Sky Survey https://science.nrao.edu/science/surveys/vlass • Expanded (bandwidth, time resolution) capabilities of Jansky VLA • 20 years since previous pioneering VLA sky surveys – NVSS 45” 1.4GHz (84MHz) 450µJy/bm (2932hrs) 30Kdeg2 2Msrcs – FIRST 5” 1.4GHz (84MHz) 150µJy/bm (3200hrs) 10.6Kdeg2 95Ksrcs • Preparing the way for a new generation of surveys – ASKAP and MeerKAT – SKA phase 1 – new O/IR surveys (i/zPTF, PanSTARRS,DES,LSST), X-ray (eROSITA) • Science Proposal and survey definition by community Survey Science Group (SSG) following AAS 223 workshop in Jan 2014 – community review and approval in March 2015 3 B&E Caltech July 2016 VLASS Survey Science Group A Survey For the Whole Community Proposal Authors: Table 8: VLASS Proposal Contributors, Including VLASS White Paper Authors F. Abdalla, Jose Afonso, A. Amara, David Bacon, Julie Banfield, Tim Bastian, Richard Battye, Stefi A. Baum, Tony Beasley, Rainer Beck, Robert Becker, Michael Bell, Edo Berger, Rob Beswick, Sanjay Bhat- nagar, Mark Birkinshaw, V. -
A Participatory Approach Towards AI for Social Good Elizabeth Bondi,∗1 Lily Xu,∗1 Diana Acosta-Navas,2 Jackson A
Envisioning Communities: A Participatory Approach Towards AI for Social Good Elizabeth Bondi,∗1 Lily Xu,∗1 Diana Acosta-Navas,2 Jackson A. Killian1 {ebondi,lily_xu,jkillian}@g.harvard.edu,[email protected] 1John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University 2Department of Philosophy, Harvard University ABSTRACT Research in artificial intelligence (AI) for social good presupposes some definition of social good, but potential definitions have been PACT seldom suggested and never agreed upon. The normative ques- tion of what AI for social good research should be “for” is not concept thoughtfully elaborated, or is frequently addressed with a utilitar- capabilities approach ian outlook that prioritizes the needs of the majority over those who have been historically marginalized, brushing aside realities of injustice and inequity. We argue that AI for social good ought to be realization assessed by the communities that the AI system will impact, using participatory approach as a guide the capabilities approach, a framework to measure the ability of different policies to improve human welfare equity. Fur- thermore, we lay out how AI research has the potential to catalyze social progress by expanding and equalizing capabilities. We show Figure 1: The framework we propose, Participatory Ap- how the capabilities approach aligns with a participatory approach proach to enable Capabilities in communiTies (PACT), for the design and implementation of AI for social good research melds the capabilities approach (see Figure 3) with a partici- in a framework we introduce called PACT, in which community patory approach (see Figures 4 and 5) to center the needs of members affected should be brought in as partners and their input communities in AI research projects. -
Square Kilometre Array: Processing Voluminous Meerkat Data on IRIS
SQUARE KILOMETRE ARRAY :PROCESSING VOLUMINOUS MEERKAT DATA ON IRIS Priyaa Thavasimani Anna Scaife Faculty of Science and Engineering Faculty of Science and Engineering The University of Manchester The University of Manchester Manchester, UK Manchester, UK [email protected] [email protected] June 1, 2021 ABSTRACT Processing astronomical data often comes with huge challenges with regards to data management as well as data processing. MeerKAT telescope is one of the precursor telescopes of the World’s largest observatory Square Kilometre Array. So far, MeerKAT data was processed using the South African computing facility i.e. IDIA, and exploited to make ground-breaking discoveries. However, to process MeerKAT data on UK’s IRIS computing facility requires new implementation of the MeerKAT pipeline. This paper focuses on how to transfer MeerKAT data from the South African site to UK’s IRIS systems for processing. We discuss about our RapifXfer Data transfer framework for transferring the MeerKAT data from South Africa to the UK, and the MeerKAT job processing framework pertaining to the UK’s IRIS resources. Keywords Big Data · MeerKAT · Square Kilometre Array · Telescope · Data Analysis · Imaging Introduction The Square Kilometre Array (SKA) will be the world’s largest telescope, but once built it comes with its huge data challenges. The SKA instrument sites are in Australia and South Africa. This paper focuses on the South African SKA precursor MeerKAT, in particular on its data processing, calibration, and imaging using the UK IRIS resources. MeerKAT data are initially hosted by IDIA (Inter-University Institute for Data-Intensive Astronomy; [1]), which itself provides data storage and a data-intensive research cloud facility to service the MeerKAT science community in South Africa. -
Data Science for Physics and Astronomy Lightning Talks Data Science for Physics & Astronomy Classification of Transients Catarina Alves
Data science for Physics and Astronomy Lightning talks Data science for Physics & Astronomy Classification of transients Catarina Alves PhD @ Supervisors: ● Prof Hiranya Peiris ● Dr Jason McEwen [email protected] Supervised Learning Classification Unbalanced data Non representative data catarina-alves Catarina-Alves Unsupervised Learning Real time classification Anomaly detection Large datasets 2 Data science for Physics & Astronomy Adrian Bevan Particle physics experimentalist with a keen interest in DS & AI Parameter estimation: ● 2 decades of likelihood fitting experience spanning NA48, BaBar and ATLAS experiments; currently using ML on the ATLAS and MoEDAL experiments @ LHC. ● Latest relevant work: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsta.2019.0392 Machine learning: ● Broad interest in algorithms: domains of validity to understand what to use when and why to optimise the use of algorithms for a given problem domain. Have used SVMs, BDTs, MLPs, CNNs, Deep Networks, KNN for analysis work. ● Working on understanding why algorithms make a given inference or decision based on input feature space (explainability and interpretability). ● Want to explore unsupervised learning and bayesian networks when an appropriate problem presents itself. Have taught or currently teach data science and machine learning undergrad and grad courses. [email protected] 3 Data science for Physics & Astronomy David Berman 4 Data science for Physics & Astronomy Richard Bielby 5 Data science for Nachiketa Chakraborty Physics & Astronomy -
The Very Small Array: Latest Results and Future Plans
The Very Small Array: latest results and future plans Keith Grainge Astrophysics Group, Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge Rencontres de Moriond, 31 March 2004 OVERVIEW The Very Small Array (VSA) • Current primordial observations • The S-Z effect • Planned upgrades to the instrument • Future science at high ` • Summary • 1 THE VSA CONSORTIUM Cavendish Astrophysics Group Roger Boysen Tony Brown Chris Clementson Mike Crofts Jerry Czeres Roger Dace Keith Grainge (PM) Mike Hobson (PI) Mike Jones Rüdiger Kneissl Katy Lancaster Anthony Lasenby Klaus Maisinger Ian Northrop Guy Pooley Vic Quy Nutan Rajguru Ben Rusholme Richard Saunders Richard Savage Anna Scaife Jack Schofield Paul Scott (Former PI) Clive Shaw Anze Slosar Angela Taylor David Titterington Elizabeth Waldram Brian Wood Jodrell Bank Observatory Colin Baines Richard Battye Eddie Blackhurst Pedro Carreira Kieran Cleary Rod Davies Richard Davis Clive Dickinson Yaser Hafez Mark Polkey Bob Watson Althea Wilkinson Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias Jose Alberto Rubiño-Martin Carlos Guiterez Rafa Rebolo Lopez Pedro Sosa-Molina Ricardo Genova-Santos 2 THE VERY SMALL ARRAY (VSA) Sited on Observatorio del Teide, Tenerife • 14 antennas 91 baselines • ) Observing frequency ν = 26 36 GHz; bandwidth ∆ν = 1:5 GHz • − Compact configuration: 143 mm horns; ` = 150 800; ∆` 90 (without • − ≈ mosaicing); Sept 2000 – Sept 2001 Extended configuration: 322 mm horns; ` = 300 1800; ∆` 200 (without • − ≈ mosaicing); Sept 2001 – present 3 COMPARISON WITH OTHER CMB EXPERIMENTS Different systematics from “single-dish” experiments: • – negligible pointing error – negligible beam uncertainty Different from other CMB interferometers (DASI, CBI): • – RT survey and dedicated source subtraction 2-element interferometer remove effect of extragalactic point sources ) – tracking elements rather than comounted can apply fringe rate filter to remove unwanted signals. -
David C. Parkes John A
David C. Parkes John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, 33 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA www.eecs.harvard.edu/~parkes December 2020 Citizenship: USA and UK Date of Birth: July 20, 1973 Education University of Oxford Oxford, U.K. Engineering and Computing Science, M.Eng (first class), 1995 University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA Computer and Information Science, Ph.D., 2001 Advisor: Professor Lyle H. Ungar. Thesis: Iterative Combinatorial Auctions: Achieving Economic and Computational Efficiency Appointments George F. Colony Professor of Computer Science, 7/12-present Cambridge, MA Harvard University Co-Director, Data Science Initiative, 3/17-present Cambridge, MA Harvard University Area Dean for Computer Science, 7/13-6/17 Cambridge, MA Harvard University Harvard College Professor, 7/12-6/17 Cambridge, MA Harvard University Gordon McKay Professor of Computer Science, 7/08-6/12 Cambridge, MA Harvard University John L. Loeb Associate Professor of the Natural Sciences, 7/05-6/08 Cambridge, MA and Associate Professor of Computer Science Harvard University Assistant Professor of Computer Science, 7/01-6/05 Cambridge, MA Harvard University Lecturer of Operations and Information Management, Spring 2001 Philadelphia, PA The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania Research Intern, Summer 2000 Hawthorne, NY IBM T.J.Watson Research Center Research Intern, Summer 1997 Palo Alto, CA Xerox Palo Alto Research Center 1 Other Appointments Member, 2019- Amsterdam, Netherlands Scientific Advisory Committee, CWI Member, 2019- Cambridge, MA Senior Common Room (SCR) of Lowell House Member, 2019- Berlin, Germany Scientific Advisory Board, Max Planck Inst. Human Dev. Co-chair, 9/17- Cambridge, MA FAS Data Science Masters Co-chair, 9/17- Cambridge, MA Harvard Business Analytics Certificate Program Co-director, 9/17- Cambridge, MA Laboratory for Innovation Science, Harvard University Affiliated Faculty, 4/14- Cambridge, MA Institute for Quantitative Social Science International Fellow, 4/14-12/18 Zurich, Switzerland Center Eng.