DOCSLIB.ORG

Monument Creek Watershed Landscape Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Monument Creek Watershed Landscape Assessment MonumentMonument CreekCreek WatershedWatershed LandscapeLandscape AssessmentAssessment a Legacy Resource Management Program Project Monument Creek Watershed Landscape Assessment prepared for: United States Air Force Academy 8120 Edgerton Dr Ste 40 Air Force Academy CO 80840-2400 prepared by: John Armstrong and Joe Stevens Colorado Natural Heritage Program 254 General Services Building Colorado State University, College of Natural Resources Fort Collins CO 80523 31 January 2002 Copyright 2002 Colorado Natural Heritage Program Cover photo: Panorama of Pikes Peak and the Rampart Range (the western boundary of the Monument Creek Watershed) from Palmer Park. Photograph by J. Armstrong. Funding provided by the Legacy Resource Management Program, administered by the US Army Corps of Engineers. table of contents list of figures ................................................................................................3 list of tables ..................................................................................................3 list of maps ..................................................................................................3 list of photographs .....................................................................................4 acknowledgements...........................................................................................5 introduction .......................................................................................................7 project history .............................................................................................7 background ..........................................................................................7 the military mission ...................................................................................8 assessment overview ..................................................................................8 planning team .............................................................................................9 methodology ...............................................................................................9 project area boundary.......................................................................12 a note about units, scale and accuracy ...........................................13 terminology ...............................................................................................14 landscape ............................................................................................14 project area overview and planning context ........................................15 other regional assessments ..............................................................17 watershed characterization ...........................................................................19 a landscape ................................................................................................19 the Monument Creek Watershed landscape ........................................21 watershed landscape regions ..................................................................22 regional history .........................................................................................24 biological systems context.......................................................................27 biologically significant species and communities ........................27 physical systems context .........................................................................30 physiography .....................................................................................30 soils ......................................................................................................32 geology ................................................................................................38 climate .................................................................................................39 social systems context ..............................................................................40 land use...............................................................................................40 land status ..........................................................................................45 recreation ............................................................................................47 economics ...........................................................................................47 current condition ............................................................................................51 biological systems ....................................................................................51 vegetation ...........................................................................................51 wildlife ................................................................................................59 physical systems .......................................................................................64 hydrology ...........................................................................................64 social systems ............................................................................................67 population / settlement patterns / development ..........................68 reference condition.........................................................................................71 historic biological systems ......................................................................73 vegetation and fire ecology / history ..............................................73 Public Land Survey summary .........................................................77 original township descriptions .......................................................83 short-term change: 1958 to 2001 ......................................................97 1 wildlife ................................................................................................ 97 historic physical systems .........................................................................98 hydrologic function...........................................................................98 historic social systems.............................................................................. 98 historic human populations.............................................................98 landscape synthesis...................................................................................... 101 characterization of change over time .................................................. 101 landscape trends .....................................................................................104 results and discussion............................................................................ 104 watershed prioritization.............................................................................. 107 watershed prioritization analysis ........................................................ 107 methods ............................................................................................ 108 results and discussion............................................................................ 109 desired future condition.............................................................................. 111 stakeholder input ...................................................................................112 issues summary and synthesis ...................................................... 112 planning issues and opportunities ...................................................... 114 issues summary and discussion.................................................... 115 change analysis .......................................................................................117 the desired future condition .................................................................117 future condition of the biological domain ...................................117 future condition of the physical domain .....................................117 future condition of the social domain .......................................... 118 recommendations .........................................................................................119 biological domain ...................................................................................119 vegetation .........................................................................................119 wildlife .............................................................................................. 121 rare and / or imperiled plants and animals .................................123 physical domain .....................................................................................123 soils.................................................................................................... 123 hydrology .........................................................................................124 slope .................................................................................................. 124 social domain .......................................................................................... 125 notes ................................................................................................................ 129 references .......................................................................................................131 digital data sources.......................................................................................135 appendices .....................................................................................................137
Load more

Recommended publications
  • OCN Vol. 11 No. 10
    PRSRT STD U.S. POSTAGE PAID MONUMENT, CO PERMIT NO. 32 **ECRWSS** Postal Customer Issue #128 — Volume 11 Number 10 — Saturday, October 1, 2011 Free Upcoming Woodmoor Local Events district moving See pages 31-35 for details of these forward with deal and many other local events. for ranch water th 38 Annual Christmas Arts & Craft By Candice Hitt Fair, Sat.-Sun., Oct.1-2, 9 a.m.-5 At the Woodmoor Water and Sanitation p.m., Sat.; 10 a.m.-4 p.m. Sun. District’s (WWSD) board meeting Sept. 13, members discussed the current status Bear Creek Elementary Walk to of the JV Ranch acquisition. Currently School Day, Wed., Oct 5, 8:30 a.m. the district is dependent on the Denver Basin Aquifer, which is a non-renewable Public forum: Meet the Candidates for source of water. Aquifers are shrinking D-38 Board of Education, Wed., Oct. and are not a reliable source for a long- 5, 7-9 p.m. term supply of water, so aquifer depen- dency is an issue. Monument Academy Charter Hosts Public meetings are being sched- the D-38 Candidates, Mon., Oct. 10, uled to answer questions and provide 7-8:30 p.m. additional information on the proj- ect. For additional information, visit The 2011 Empty Bowls & Silent www.woodmoorwater.com. The first Auction, Wed., Oct. 12, 5-7:30 p.m. public meeting is scheduled for Oct. 27 at 6 p.m. at The Barn at the Woodmoor Monument Annual Town Forum, Improvement Association. Mon., Oct. 17, 5 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Prairie Dogs and Cattle on Vegetation Disappearance on Prairie Dog Towns in Mixed-Grass Prairie
    South Dakota State University Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange South Dakota Beef Report, 2004 Animal Science Reports 2004 Effects of Prairie Dogs and Cattle on egetV ation Disappearance on Prairie Dog Towns in Mixed- Grass Prairie Matthew .B Stoltenberg South Dakota State University Patricia S. Johnson South Dakota State University Alexander J. Smart South Dakota State University Lax Xu South Dakota State University Follow this and additional works at: http://openprairie.sdstate.edu/sd_beefreport_2004 Part of the Animal Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Stoltenberg, Matthew B.; Johnson, Patricia S.; Smart, Alexander J.; and Xu, Lax, "Effects of Prairie Dogs and Cattle on eV getation Disappearance on Prairie Dog Towns in Mixed-Grass Prairie" (2004). South Dakota Beef Report, 2004. Paper 18. http://openprairie.sdstate.edu/sd_beefreport_2004/18 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Animal Science Reports at Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in South Dakota Beef Report, 2004 by an authorized administrator of Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Effects of Prairie Dogs and Cattle on Vegetation Disappearance on Prairie Dog Towns in Mixed-Grass Prairie Matthew B. Stoltenberg1, Patricia S. Johnson2, Alexander J. Smart3, and Lan Xu4,5 Department of Animal and Range Sciences BEEF 2004 – 17 Abstract be adjusted to account for forage disappearance 12345 due to prairie dogs. Quantitative data is lacking on competition between prairie dogs and cattle for forage on Introduction mixed-grass prairie pastures.
    [Show full text]
  • The PDF File
    N Happy New Year! from the all-volunteer staff of Free W E Our Community News S Reporting on community issues in Monument, Palmer Lake, and the surrounding Tri-Lakes area. Volume 2 Number 1 — Saturday, January 5, 2002 Monument Board Dec 17 3 Palmer Lake Town Council Dec 13 4 Tri-Lakes Olympic Torch events planned for Monument Board Dec 27 5 January 31 Monument Planning Commission Dec 5 By Roy Getchell Old Denver Highway. A “Post Torch Rally” will com- 12 Chairman, Tri-Lakes Olympic Torch Committee mence at 2:45 pm in the Lewis-Palmer High School Triview Board Dec 13 6 In what promises to be one of the most memorable auditorium. events for the Tri-Lakes community, the Olympic Names of the local torchbearers will be released in Tri-Rec seeks developer funds 7 Torch will make a stop in Monument on January 31. In mid-January. Each torchbearer will carry the torch a commemoration of the torch passing through the Tri- fifth of a mile before passing it on. After the torch Heritage grant used to fund Tri-Lakes 7 area studies Lakes area, celebrations are planned in Palmer Lake leaves Colorado Springs on February 1, it will be car- and Monument. ried through Manitou Springs, Woodland Park, Divide, Congressional reapportionment goes 8 to court Festivities will begin at 9 am in front of the Palmer Florissant, Lake George, Johnson Village, Buena Vista, LP school board appoints new 8 Lake Town Hall. The celebration will move to the Leadville, Minturn, and Vail. On Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • ROCKY MOUNTAIN National Park CO LO 1^^.00
    ROCKY MOUNTAIN National Park CO LO 1^^.00 UNITED STATES RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL PARK. SERIES Copyright by WiswaU The Village of Estes Park nestles in a quiet little valley, surrounded by mountains Page two An Appreciation of Rocky Mountain National Park By ENOS A. MILLS, Author of "Wild Life on the Rockies," "The Rocky Mountain Wonderland," etc. Written Especially fer the United States Railroad Administration j]HE Rocky Mountain National Park is a marvelous grouping of gentle­ ness and grandeur; an eloquent, wordless hymn, sung in silent, poetic pictures; a wilderness mountain world of groves and grass plots, crags and canyons, rounded lakes with shadow-matted shores that rest in peace within the purple forest. There are wild flowers of every color, and many a silken meadow edged with ferns. Brokenness and beauty, terrace upon terrace, a magnificent hanging wild garden. Over these terraces waters rush and pour. From ice-sculptured, snow-piled peaks, young and eager streams leap in white cascades between crowding cliffs and pines. Through this wildness winds the trail, with its secrets of the centuries, where adventures come and go and where the magic camp fire blossoms in the night. In these primeval scenes the grizzly bear gives to the wilderness its master spell; the mountain ram poses on the cliff; the laughing, varied voice of the coyote echoes when the afterglow falls; the home-loving beaver builds his willow-fringed hut; the birds sing; the cheerful chipmunk frolics and never grows up; and here the world stays young. The Rocky Mountain National Park holds adventure for every visitor.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Survey of a Prairie Landscape in Montana's Glaciated
    Biological Survey of a Prairie Landscape in Montanas Glaciated Plains Final Report Prepared for: Bureau of Land Management Prepared by: Stephen V. Cooper, Catherine Jean and Paul Hendricks December, 2001 Biological Survey of a Prairie Landscape in Montanas Glaciated Plains Final Report 2001 Montana Natural Heritage Program Montana State Library P.O. Box 201800 Helena, Montana 59620-1800 (406) 444-3009 BLM Agreement number 1422E930A960015 Task Order # 25 This document should be cited as: Cooper, S. V., C. Jean and P. Hendricks. 2001. Biological Survey of a Prairie Landscape in Montanas Glaciated Plains. Report to the Bureau of Land Management. Montana Natural Heritage Pro- gram, Helena. 24 pp. plus appendices. Executive Summary Throughout much of the Great Plains, grasslands limited number of Black-tailed Prairie Dog have been converted to agricultural production colonies that provide breeding sites for Burrow- and as a result, tall-grass prairie has been ing Owls. Swift Fox now reoccupies some reduced to mere fragments. While more intact, portions of the landscape following releases the loss of mid - and short- grass prairie has lead during the last decade in Canada. Great Plains to a significant reduction of prairie habitat Toad and Northern Leopard Frog, in decline important for grassland obligate species. During elsewhere, still occupy some wetlands and the last few decades, grassland nesting birds permanent streams. Additional surveys will have shown consistently steeper population likely reveal the presence of other vertebrate declines over a wider geographic area than any species, especially amphibians, reptiles, and other group of North American bird species small mammals, of conservation concern in (Knopf 1994), and this alarming trend has been Montana.
    [Show full text]
  • Pinery Provincial Park Vascular Plant List Flowering Latin Name Common Name Community Date
    Pinery Provincial Park Vascular Plant List Flowering Latin Name Common Name Community Date EQUISETACEAE HORSETAIL FAMILY Equisetum arvense L. Field Horsetail FF Equisetum fluviatile L. Water Horsetail LRB Equisetum hyemale L. ssp. affine (Engelm.) Stone Common Scouring-rush BS Equisetum laevigatum A. Braun Smooth Scouring-rush WM Equisetum variegatum Scheich. ex Fried. ssp. Small Horsetail LRB Variegatum DENNSTAEDIACEAE BRACKEN FAMILY Pteridium aquilinum (L.) Kuhn Bracken-Fern COF DRYOPTERIDACEAE TRUE FERN FAMILILY Athyrium filix-femina (L.) Roth ssp. angustum (Willd.) Northeastern Lady Fern FF Clausen Cystopteris bulbifera (L.) Bernh. Bulblet Fern FF Dryopteris carthusiana (Villars) H.P. Fuchs Spinulose Woodfern FF Matteuccia struthiopteris (L.) Tod. Ostrich Fern FF Onoclea sensibilis L. Sensitive Fern FF Polystichum acrostichoides (Michaux) Schott Christmas Fern FF ADDER’S-TONGUE- OPHIOGLOSSACEAE FERN FAMILY Botrychium virginianum (L.) Sw. Rattlesnake Fern FF FLOWERING FERN OSMUNDACEAE FAMILY Osmunda regalis L. Royal Fern WM POLYPODIACEAE POLYPODY FAMILY Polypodium virginianum L. Rock Polypody FF MAIDENHAIR FERN PTERIDACEAE FAMILY Adiantum pedatum L. ssp. pedatum Northern Maidenhair Fern FF THELYPTERIDACEAE MARSH FERN FAMILY Thelypteris palustris (Salisb.) Schott Marsh Fern WM LYCOPODIACEAE CLUB MOSS FAMILY Lycopodium lucidulum Michaux Shining Clubmoss OF Lycopodium tristachyum Pursh Ground-cedar COF SELAGINELLACEAE SPIKEMOSS FAMILY Selaginella apoda (L.) Fern. Spikemoss LRB CUPRESSACEAE CYPRESS FAMILY Juniperus communis L. Common Juniper Jun-E DS Juniperus virginiana L. Red Cedar Jun-E SD Thuja occidentalis L. White Cedar LRB PINACEAE PINE FAMILY Larix laricina (Duroi) K. Koch Tamarack Jun LRB Pinus banksiana Lambert Jack Pine COF Pinus resinosa Sol. ex Aiton Red Pine Jun-M CF Pinery Provincial Park Vascular Plant List 1 Pinery Provincial Park Vascular Plant List Flowering Latin Name Common Name Community Date Pinus strobus L.
    [Show full text]
  • Black-Tailed Praire Dog Surveys in Pueblo, Crowley, Otero
    BLACK-TAILED PRAIRIE DOG SURVEYS OF BLM LANDS IN EASTERN COLORADO A Report to the Bureau of Land Management, Canon City Office By The Colorado Natural Heritage Program Colorado State University March 2004 Timothy J Assal and John R Sovell Colorado Natural Heritage Program Colorado State University 8002 Campus Delivery Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-8002 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION…………………………………………………………………………….…4 METHODS……………………………………………………………………………………….6 RESULTS………………………………………………………………………………………...7 Study Area………………………………………………………………………………………7 Element Occurrences of Animals Tracked by CNHP………………………………………….11 Parcel Summaries………………………………………………………………………………17 Baca County………………………………………………………………………………..15 Bent County..…………………………………………...……………………………....….21 El Paso County..…………………………………………………………….…...…………27 Kiowa County…………………………………………………………………...…………29 Las Animas County………………………………………………………………………...33 Lincoln County…………………………………………………………..………………...39 Logan County………………………………………………..……………………………..45 Morgan County………………..…………………………………………………………...47 Prowers County…..…………….…………………………………………………………..51 Sedgwick County…………………………………………………………………………..55 Washington County…….………………………………………………………………….57 Weld County………………….……………………………………………………………59 Yuma County………………………………………………………………………………61 Potential Conservation Areas….…………………………………………………………...65 B2 Potential Conservation Areas………………………………………………………...65 Chico Basin Shortgrass Prairie..……………………………………………………..65 Jesus Mesa……...…………………………………………………………………....71 Neeskah…….………….………………………………………………….………….75 Signal
    [Show full text]
  • Profiles of Colorado Roadless Areas
    PROFILES OF COLORADO ROADLESS AREAS Prepared by the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region July 23, 2008 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARAPAHO-ROOSEVELT NATIONAL FOREST ......................................................................................................10 Bard Creek (23,000 acres) .......................................................................................................................................10 Byers Peak (10,200 acres)........................................................................................................................................12 Cache la Poudre Adjacent Area (3,200 acres)..........................................................................................................13 Cherokee Park (7,600 acres) ....................................................................................................................................14 Comanche Peak Adjacent Areas A - H (45,200 acres).............................................................................................15 Copper Mountain (13,500 acres) .............................................................................................................................19 Crosier Mountain (7,200 acres) ...............................................................................................................................20 Gold Run (6,600 acres) ............................................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Drainage Basins D R R a F A
    EEllbbeerrtt CCoouunnttyy Coommeerrccee Rdd d d R R h h Douglas County a Douglas County a m m rr a a d d D R D R R R t t Fremont C k Fremont P C k r P r w e w W rr e e h a W e a av h E h avy e h y e E s O d d s st rs Oa DD d r k r o d t r a n e r o n relllla ee k Dr a K r n Fort e L K n Fort L B kk e Carpenter n C B Carpenter R n C b R Bald u L b ee u Bald L r S v Plum r v ee Plum l k h i o e k h r i o e l r RAMAH D g rr l l D g l n a l n a d T G G T i h r G d G ok St h r CC o E ro St r B ok i Bro o r t i E t n d d Sundance Mountain d d e n r E p e r E Creek kk p R oo W g E Creek H R g E W ll v Mountain w v H w R u R R M ountain R u r Creek r Creek W EE t W r cc o H i r h t o H i e e a Antelope h n D a d n e i D e p n a d Antelope o n p o e g n a n r r g WW dd e e d g o e e d g T o H R n PLPL0400 e e T l n 8285 l e T H R T g PLPL0400 D g F m PLPL020 0 F West D u e D u m PLPL0200 PLP0600 D e v a West r a r d v t PLP0600 d t m l r a i l r h k S l k l i h rr a m S i l r l i dd g c n d r R w c r amah n E R Rd g i r a E Ramah w o T DD u i a PALMER LAKE o D T amah Rd D E R u G R d k ah R r G d RR am h * R k e E A r n d R o e n A * h oo S S o a n c e a d e n r c d cc r Creek C m r r W ee D C W m D aa s o e Creek R C l s r Ca o e o l t S a h r R t e rr b h r r d e d o b S e p dr D d e p ra D e R M l a l oss a e L R M Rock l D a l oss Rd mm L Dr e Rock Rd u DD r r l s e m a r l s lm t a u l B s r o B aa l t t s r o l t h M lh r P l r M F C S P e e e l e C S g gg a e F l e g a i l n a W Ramah Rd i l n a Rd t o A W Ramah o p t A d r C nn p d r C
    [Show full text]
  • Widefield Community Park Master Plan
    Widefield Community Park Master Plan March 2017 El Paso County Community Services Planning Division ~ Acknowledgements ~ El Paso County Board of County Commissioners Darryl Glenn – President Mark Waller – President Pro Tempore Stan VanderWerf, Parks Liason Peggy Littleton Longinos Gonzalez Jr. Henry Yankowski – County Administrator El Paso County Park Advisory Board Bob Falcone – Chair Ann Nichols – 1st Vice-Chair Jane Dillon – 2nd Vice-Chair Terri Hayes – 3rd Vice-Chair Judi Tobias – Secretary Shirley Gipson Julia Sands de Melendez Alan Rainville Todd Weaver El Paso County Parks Master Plan Team Tim Wolken, Community Services Director Elaine Kleckner, Planning Manager Jason Meyer, Project Manager Ross Williams, Park Planner Brad Bixler, Park Operations Manager Pat Salamon, South District Supervisor John Leyba, South District Park Maintenance III Dana Nordstrom, Community Outreach Coordinator Todd Marts, Recreation and Cultural Services Manager Nancy Prieve, Natural Resources Specialist Brad Hartmann, Engineer II, Public Works Victoria Chavez, Principal Transportation Planner, Public Works ~ Table of Contents ~ Chapter 1: Executive Summary 1 • Background 1 • Master Plan Purpose 1 • Master Plan Vision 2 • Planning Process 2 • Summary of Master Plan Goals 3 • Summary of Action Items 4 Chapter 2: Existing Conditions 9 • Background 9 • Topography 10 • Climate 11 • Geologic Features and Soils 11 • Hydrography 13 • Flora and Fauna 13 • Colorado Natural Heritage Program Potential Conservation Areas 14 • Scenic Resources 16 • Land Use and Park
    [Show full text]
  • July 15Th – Pikes Peak Group Program
    July 2014 | No. 203 July 15th – Pikes Peak Group Program Jes Meiris Presents: Big wall speed climbing on El Capitan Please join us in welcoming Jes Meiris to the monthly program Her passions include climbing big walls in alpine style, of the CMC’s Pikes Peak Group at 7:30 p.m. on July 15th in the mountain biking, hiking, playing piano, and snow sports. All Souls Unitarian Church, 730 N. Tejon St. Personal climbing adventures have yielded ascents in Squamish BC, Yosemite CA, Red Rocks NV, Smith Rocks OR, the Cascades, and Colorado's Rocky Mountains to name a few. With climbing partner Quinn Brett, she held the women's speed record on the Nose of El Capitan (10 hours, 19 minutes, on June 10, 2012), and just a couple of days ago reclaimed the record. Come hear about the history, the training for climbing almost four thousand vertical feet, the mental challenges, and bringing all the elements together for a successful climb. Jes is a Colorado native whose passion for the outdoors was kindled at a very young age. After living on both coasts and a few places in between, she made her home in Colorado Springs during the winter months. She coaches a competitive climbing team for Fountain Valley School, leads both indoor and outdoor technical skills clinics, and works as a At the monthly presentation Jes will discuss valuable lessons professional model. During the summer she travels regionally, she has learned through climbing and guiding, including her guiding rock climbing and mountain biking trips. In addition, speed ascent of the Nose on El Capitan.
    [Show full text]
  • Cogjm.Rmo-604.Pdf (1.625Mb)
    RMO- 6~~lV 3m!c -o UNITED STATES DEPART~illNT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY INVESTIGATIONS OF DO~STIC RADIOACTIVE RAW MATERIALS, BERYLLIUM, AND OTHER TRACE ELE~NTS (J PREPARED FOR U. S. ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION MONTHLY REPORT--NOVEMBER 1951 TRACE ELEMENTS OFFICE C] Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any.oftheir employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed in this report, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference therein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. REPRODUCED FROM BEST AVAILABLE COPY -2- CJ .3 Page SUIDinary .......................................................................... o .......... o o .................. " ~ .......... .. 7 Reconnaissance investigations, domestic .......................................................... .. 9 Property examinations .................................................................................. .. 9 Copper-uranium deposits in sandstones .................................................... .. 9 Relation
    [Show full text]