Wilton Village - a History by G

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wilton Village - a History by G Preface G. Evans Hubbard first published the Wilton Bulletin as a single sheet in early 1937. On March 17, 1938 it became a weekly of increased size and scope. As its editor, Hubbard began including his history of Wilton in weekly installments. These he continued through mid-1942. These installments have been extracted from microfilm copies of the Bulletin, converted to digital files and cleansed of distortions caused by the microfilming process.. They were then updated to include changes made by Mr. Hubbard in preparation for publication in book form. While this never took place, the first five chapters were published in a 60 page booklet available at the Wilton Library and which the Wilton Historical Society had for sale for many years. Not meant to be read as a book on a standard computer monitor, this presentation of Hubbard’s work is intended as a research tool providing rapid access to names, dates, places or events using the Adobe search provisions. The Adobe reader can even read it to you out loud. And, since it is in digital form, this history could also be self- published in book form after final proofreading.. A Table of Contents is included at the end to aid in visual searching and to give an idea of the topics, events and time periods covered. Adobe bookmarks have been built in to give rapid access to individual chapters. To Search, Go Edit/Search/Current Document/ Enter Term/ Click Search/ see Results with one line context. To use Bookmarks, Go Document/Add Bookmark/Select from existing Bookmarks/Click Foreword (Editorial by G. Evans Hubbard, March 17, 1937) With this number begins the publication of the story of Wilton from its founding as a village in 1726 to its incorporation as a Town in 1803. When publication has been completed it should appear in book form. This method has the great advantage of permitting criticism 1 and correction. There are many things which the editor does not know about Wilton, there are other things he knows but wrongly. As each chapter appears, he hopes to receive such aid as only those who have lived in Wilton all their lives can give him. With this assistance, the ultimate book should be an accurate account of the early days of this Town. The value of a Town history is threefold. It presents the facts in regard to persons and places so that the present generation can know the deeds of their ancestors and the places where historic events have occurred. The story of David Lambert, Taverner and "Brander and Toller of Horses", and of his grandson, the eminent merchant of New York, brother-in-law of Archibald Graicie, is an interesting one. The march of the British through Wilton in 1777 and the houses they sacked is a tale every one in the town should know. Every owner of an old homestead is interested in the date of its building and in the doings of its early denizens. A second value of a history of a small community is that it permits a study of a microcosm in which the great events of history can be checked. The Wilton records have been so fortunately preserved that we know everyone who lived here during the most interesting period of American history. They cover the period from the division of lands bought of the Indians through the conquest of Canada and the Revolution right up to the organization of these United States and the administration of the first two presidents. With these records we can prepare a study in detail which is not blurred, as it would be on a larger canvas. What were the kinds of settlers in a typical New England community? Who served in the wars, who dissented from the established church, who were the leaders in revolt and why? The answer to such questions provides the material for the syntheses we call general history. Without them, general history is boneless. Finally, local history develops local pride. It is the great problem of a democracy to reward public service by other than money. Unless public officials act from a sense of duty, as well as for reward, we cannot expect the best results. A feeling of local pride is one of the strongest incentives to self-sacrifice. In a town which has produced great scholars like Professor Isaac Stuart and the two Olmsteds, where eminent patriots like Colonel Mead and Major Comstock have lived, there is a tradition of excellence and of sacrifice that must induce emulation. Wilton can justly be proud of its past. It will strive to be proud of its future. Page 2 of 363 2 Wilton Village - A History By G. Evans Hubbard __________________________ CHAPTER I THE BEGINNINGS The area which is now the Town of Wilton was for sixty years nothing more than a part of the vast domain of the Town of Norwalk. The first settlers, who came to Norwalk in a body in the spring of 1651 owned in common all the fifty thousand acres from the Saugatuck to Five Mile River and up country “so far as an Indian could go in a day”. From this great estate there have been carved the present Norwalk, the whole of Wilton, about half of New Canaan and half of Westport as well as parts of present day Darien and Weston. The fourteen original families in Norwalk were of course unable to occupy more than a small part of their purchase. Since they were forbidden by law to live more than a mile from the meeting house, all the original homes were long clustered in a small area about the village green. In addition to these home lots of two or three acres the settlers were allowed private possession of sections in the “planting field”, but their cattle, sheep and hogs were cared for by communal herds and shepherds who roamed the neighboring woods in search of pasture. Sequest From a very early date this pasturage area became defined and the citizens were forbidden to make enclosures within which would interfere with the free passage of cattle. This common pasture was spoken of as “sequestered” and its outer bounds known as the “Sequesture Line” Indian Field To protect the planted areas around the village from roaming cattle it was necessary to build a common fence with numerous gates or “barrs,” to maintain which there were regularly elected Fence Viewers and Gate Keepers. 3 It was, however, not so easy to restrain the movements of the aborigines within the limits of the Town. The Indians were tractable enough, cultivated small fields of maize and were great fishermen. At first their plots were contiguous to those of the whites on Gregorie's Point. The settlers' hogs were, however, always getting into the negligently fenced plantings of the Indians and frequent damage claims resulted. As population increased, there was need of more land for crops. Hence it was only twenty years after the first settlement that it was thought best to segregate the Indians. They were ordered to remove to the Chestnut Hills, beyond the "Sequest Line", and in what is now Wilton. Our first settlers were therefore the Christianized Indians of Norwalk. They remained here for sixteen years, their lands known as the "Indian Field". Being so far from their accustomed diet of seafood, many must have moved away. In 1687 the remnant was permitted to move to 45 acres on Ely’s Neck in Norwalk and Chestnut Hill was opened to private ownership. These Indian plantations, meager though they probably were, offered sufficient attraction to the second generation of Norwalkers for them to be offered in the same division as that of "Over the River", what is now South Norwalk. Jackin Gregorie the elder took up land here which he sold to the Abbott brothers in 1694. So did Robert Stewart, land later occupied by his sons. Other of these earliest landowners in Wilton were Elnathan Hanford and Eliphalet Lockwood. Much time was to elapse, however, before the first homes came to be built so far from the meeting house. For those who wished to move farther afield, there were the open lands beyond Norwalk bounds. Already several Norwalk families had gone far up Norwalk River to make a new settlement at Pahquiogue, later known as Danbury. (1685) In 1697 there was a petition of ten Norwalk families to permit the purchase of Ridgefield, between Danbury and Norwalk, a petition granted ten years later, and the purchase made in 1708. These were orthodox settlements, a group of houses around a church. There were, however, even hardier pioneers who had begun to build their isolated homes beyond the Sequest Line, cleared the primeval forest from their lands and led an individual and solitary life in the wilderness. Such were the founders of Wilton. First Homestead It is curious that the first homestead in Wilton was taken up, not just beyond the Sequest Line at the shortest possible distance from the Meeting House but at the very furthest of Norwalk's bounds. This was the purchase by Jonathan Wood, a weaver from Long Island, of a tract, contents unknown, from the land of Matthew Marvin northerly "till the mountain and river comes together." It is described as "above" Page 4 of 363 4 Pimpawaug, which is Algonquin for "Narrow Place" and refers to the gorge at the entrance to what is now Cannondale. The date was April 17th, 1706, two years before the purchase of Ridgefield from the Indians. It is impossible to say what were the motives of Jonathan Wood in establishing his home at so remote a spot.
Recommended publications
  • Stamford Hazards and Community Resilience Workshop Summary Report Master
    Photo Credit: Bob Luckey City of Stamford Hazards and Community Resilience Workshop Summary of Findings City of Stamford Hazards and Community Resilience Workshop Summary of Findings Overview The need for municipalities, regional planning organizations, states and federal agen- cies to increase resilience and adapt to extreme weather events and mounting natural hazards is strikingly evident along the coast of Connecticut. Recent events such as Tropical Storm Irene, the Halloween Snow Storm, Hurricane Sandy, and most recently Blizzard Juno have reinforced this urgency and compelled leading communities like the City of Stamford to proactively plan and mitigate risks. Ultimately, this type of leader- ship is to be commended because it will reduce the exposure and vulnerability of Stam- ford’s citizens, infrastructure and ecosystems and serve as a model for communities across Connecticut, the Atlantic Seaboard, and the Nation. In the fall of 2013, a partnership formed between the City of Stamford, Western Con- necticut Council of Governments, and The Nature Conservancy. This partnership fo- cused on increasing awareness of risks from natural and climate-related hazards and to assess the vulnerabilities, and strengths within the City of Stamford. This was actual- ized through a series of presentations, meetings, and outreach to build stakeholder will- ingness and engagement followed by a Hazards and Community Resilience Workshop in December of 2014. The core directive of the Workshop was the engagement with and between community stakeholders in order to facilitate the education, planning and ulti- mately implementation of priority adaptation action. The Workshop’s central objectives were to: Deine extreme weather and local natural and climate-related hazards; Identify existing and future vulnerabilities and strengths; Develop and prioritize actions for the City and broader stakeholder networks; Identify opportunities for the community to advance actions to reduce risk and increase resilience comprehensively.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut Town Guides: Compiled from Collections at the CT State Library
    Connecticut Town Guides: Compiled from Collections at the CT State Library Compiled by Jeannie Sherman, Reference Librarian, History & Genealogy Unit, Connecticut State Library, 2016 Introduction Many people visit the Connecticut State Library to research their family history. We hold one of the best genealogy collections in Connecticut including our indexes to pre-1850 vital records, cemetery inscriptions, church & family bible records, marriage & death notices, and probate estate papers. Though these indexes are state-wide by surname, we also hold records for each town. As any person who attempts to do genealogy research in Connecticut discovers, knowing what town a family lived in is very important. Connecticut currently has one hundred and sixty-nine towns each with their own vital, land, and probate district chronology. As towns in Connecticut were created, most were set off from a parent town. County boundaries also changed throughout Connecticut's history, so knowing a parent town or knowing in which county a town was located over time can help researchers search for court and other records. The purpose of these Town Guides is to have in one place basic information about each town. This includes the year it was established, the parent town, historical county information, vital and church record information, a probate district chronology, and a list of cemeteries that were inventoried in the Hale Collection. For town vital records and church records, both the Connecticut State Library (CSL) microfilm number and the Latter-Day Saint (LDS) microfilm number are given where applicable. Researchers are encouraged to search by film number within the LDS catalog as many vital records can be found online.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Ridgefield: April 27, 1777
    American Revolution & Colonial Life Programs Pre and Post Lesson Plans & Activities The Battle of Ridgefield: April 27, 1777 • The Battle of Ridgefield was the only inland battle fought in Connecticut during the Revolutionary War. • Captain Benedict Arnold was the main commander for the battle as the British marched upon a weak Colonial Army. Arnold's defenses kept the British at bay until the larger army could come later. • Brigadier General Gold Selleck Silliman of Fairfield was also involved in the battle. In the primary source letter below, he sends word to General Wooster that they need reinforcements. • Silliman’s 2nd wife, Mary Silliman, writes to her parents after the battle, relieved that her husband and son were unharmed. Although her parents are only a few towns away, she is unable to travel the distance. • Another primary source is a silhouette of Lieutenant Colonel Abraham Gould of Fairfield, who died during the battle. At the Fairfield Museum: • Students will view a painted portrait of Mary Silliman in the galleries. • Students will see the grave marker for General Gold Selleck Silliman, his first wife, and a few of his children. • Students will also see the grave marker of Lieutenant Colonel Abraham Gould. Fairfield Museum & History Center | Fairfieldhistory.org | American Revolution: The Battle of Ridgefield A brief synopsis – The Battle of Fairfield: General Tryon of the British army thought that he would be warmly received by the people of Ridgefield after taking out a Colonial supply post just days earlier. Tryon, to his dismay, learned that the town was being barricaded by none other than General Benedict Arnold.
    [Show full text]
  • From Privateer, to Schooner Captain, to Raider
    From Privateer, to Schooner Captain, to Raider The destruction of commercial shipping during the war hurt local merchants. Capt. David Hawley decided to recoup his losses by turning privateer. In March 1776 he sailed out of Stratford, but was captured by the British. He was sent to Halifax where he and 8 men were able to steal a small boat and escape. By May 18, he was in Hartford. In August 1776, the Connecticut General Court ordered Capt. Hawley to Lake Champlain with a small naval detachment to serve under Benedict Arnold in the northern campaign. He commanded the schooner, Royal Savage, built on the lake, armed with four 6- The Battle of Valcour Island pounders and eight 4- pounders cannons. In the battle of Oct. 12, Royal Savage was out-gunned by the British ship Carleton and driven ashore on Valcour Island. While the British won the battle, the delay forced on them by having to contest an American fleet on the lake, put their plans to split the colonies off track and eventually led to their defeat at Saratoga. Hawley went on to command a series of ships in Long Island Sound to harass the British. In May 1779, the British command issued an order to capture American General Gold Selleck Silliman, commander of the militia in Fairfield County. He was captured by a British raiding party in Fairfield. To get the general back an exchange was necessary, but the state had no prisoners of sufficient status to offer. That November, Capt. Hawley gathered 20 volunteers from Stratford, who crossed the sound in small boats and captured Thomas Jones, chief justice of the Ministerial Supreme Court of the Crown.
    [Show full text]
  • 06 Biography of Mathew St. John (1590-1671)
    2 Biography of Mathew St. John (1590-1671) 2021 The St. John Genealogy Biography of Mathew St. John Living about 1590-1671 BY Suzanne St. John, A St. John Family Researcher THE ST. JOHN GENEALOGY & DNA PROJECT 2021 Citation: St. John, Suzanne. Biography of Mathew St. John (1590-1671), 2021, p. 2 3 Biography of Mathew St. John (1590-1671) 2021 MATHEW ST. JOHN AND SARAH _____ MATHEW ST. JOHN I10585 Thomas, Christopher, William, Oliver, William, Alexander, John II, John I, Oliver, Alexander, John I, Roger, John, Roger, Thomas, John, Ralph, Wimund II, Wimund I, Ansfrid II “Mathew Stoniston sone of Thomas Shonson beneth”1 was baptized April 13, 1590, St. Andrew’s Holborn, Camden, London, England.2 Familysearch.org has this record indexed under Stevnson or Stenneson.3 Record 1 Baptism: [13 Apr 1590] Mathew Stoniston sone of Thomas Shonson beneth the 13 day He was the third child and second son of THOMAS ST. JOHN and JANE MATHEW. He was most likely named, as the second son, after his mother’s surname. This seems to be a custom that appears among landed gentry and in several St. John generations. The first son is usually named after the paternal family by either taking the father or grandfather or current tenement-in- chief’s name and the second son takes the mother’s surname as a first name. With his father, Thomas, being a younger son himself, his marriage to the female heir of the Mathew family offered Thomas or one of his sons a greater chance of rising himself to tenant-in-chief of the Mathew estate.
    [Show full text]
  • Document Review and Archaeological Assessment of Selected Areas from the Revolutionary War and War of 1812
    American Battlefield Protection Program Grant 2287-16-009: Document Review and Archaeological Assessment Document Review and Archaeological Assessment of Selected Areas from the Revolutionary War and War of 1812. Plattsburgh, New York PREPARED FOR: The City of Plattsburgh, NY, 12901 IN ACCORDANCE WITH REQUIREMENTS OF GRANT FUNDING PROVIDED THROUGH: American Battlefield Protection Program Heritage Preservation Services National Park Service 1849 C Street NW (NC330) Washington, DC 20240 (Grant 2287-16-009) PREPARED BY: 4472 Basin Harbor Road, Vergennes, VT 05491 802.475.2022 • [email protected] • www.lcmm.org BY: Cherilyn A. Gilligan Christopher R. Sabick Patricia N. Reid 2019 1 American Battlefield Protection Program Grant 2287-16-009: Document Review and Archaeological Assessment Abstract As part of a regional collaboration between the City of Plattsburgh, New York, and the towns of Plattsburgh and Peru, New York, the Maritime Research Institute (MRI) at the Lake Champlain Maritime Museum (LCMM) has been chosen to investigate six historical Revolutionary War and War of 1812 sites: Valcour Island, Crab Island, Fort Brown, Fort Moreau, Fort Scott, and Plattsburgh Bay. These sites will require varying degrees of evaluation based upon the scope of the overall heritage tourism plan for the greater Plattsburgh area. The MRI’s role in this collaboration is to conduct a document review for each of the six historic sites as well as an archaeological assessment for Fort Brown and Valcour Island. The archaeological assessments will utilize KOCOA analysis outlined in the Battlefield Survey Manual of the American Battlefield Protection Program provided by the National Park Service. This deliverable fulfills Tasks 1 and 3 of the American Battlefield Protection Program (ABPP) Grant 2887-16-009.
    [Show full text]
  • War, Murder, and a “Monster of a Man” in Revolutionary New England
    THE ANXIOUS ATLANTIC: WAR, MURDER, AND A “MONSTER OF A MAN” IN REVOLUTIONARY NEW ENGLAND A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by David W. Thomas December 2018 Examining Committee Members: Travis Glasson, Advisory Chair, Department of History Mónica Ricketts, Department of History Jessica Roney, Department of History David Waldstreicher, External Member, The Graduate Center, CUNY Richard Bell, External Member, University of Maryland ii © Copyright 2018 by David W. Thomas All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT On December 11, 1782 in Wethersfield, Connecticut, a fifty-two year old English immigrant named William Beadle murdered his wife and four children and took his own life. Beadle’s erstwhile friends were aghast. William was no drunk. He was not abusive, foul-tempered, or manifestly unstable. Since arriving in 1772, Beadle had been a respected merchant in Wethersfield good society. Newspapers, pamphlets, and sermons carried the story up and down the coast. Writers quoted from a packet of letters Beadle left at the scene. Those letters disclosed Beadle’s secret allegiance to deism and the fact that the War for Independence had ruined Beadle financially, in his mind because he had acted like a patriot not a profiteer. Authors were especially unnerved with Beadle’s mysterious past. In a widely published pamphlet, Stephen Mix Mitchell, Wethersfield luminary and Beadle’s one-time closest friend, sought answers in Beadle’s youth only to admit that in ten years he had learned almost nothing about the man print dubbed a “monster.” This macabre story of family murder, and the fretful writing that carried the tale up and down the coast, is the heart of my dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Bushnell Family Genealogy, 1945
    BUSHNELL FAMILY GENEALOGY Ancestry and Posterity of FRANCIS BUSHNELL (1580 - 1646) of Horsham, England And Guilford, Connecticut Including Genealogical Notes of other Bushnell Families, whose connections with this branch of the family tree have not been determined. Compiled and written by George Eleazer Bushnell Nashville, Tennessee 1945 Bushnell Genealogy 1 The sudden and untimely death of the family historian, George Eleazer Bushnell, of Nashville, Tennessee, who devoted so many years to the completion of this work, necessitated a complete change in its publication plans and we were required to start anew without familiarity with his painstaking work and vast acquaintance amongst the members of the family. His manuscript, while well arranged, was not yet ready for printing. It has therefore been copied, recopied and edited, However, despite every effort, prepublication funds have not been secured to produce the kind of a book we desire and which Mr. Bushnell's painstaking work deserves. His material is too valuable to be lost in some library's manuscript collection. It is a faithful record of the Bushnell family, more complete than anyone could have anticipated. Time is running out and we have reluctantly decided to make the best use of available funds by producing the "book" by a process of photographic reproduction of the typewritten pages of the revised and edited manuscript. The only deviation from the original consists in slight rearrangement, minor corrections, additional indexing and numbering. We are proud to thus assist in the compiler's labor of love. We are most grateful to those prepublication subscribers listed below, whose faith and patience helped make George Eleazer Bushnell's book thus available to the Bushnell Family.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ancient Historical Records of Norwalk, Conn
    hbl.stx i F 104.N9H3 ^ Ancient historicalal records of Norw ^ ^T illllllllll /\ 153 D07bfi51D T «^«^«^«^«^ GAYLORD RG ^ ^ <* PLEASE NOTE It has been necessary to replace some of the original pages in this book with photocopy reproductions because of damage or mistreatment by a previous user. Replacement of damaged materials is both expensive and time-consuming. Please handle this volume with care so that information will not be lost to future readers. Thank you for helping to preserve the University's research collections. ^ •?BV»^ T THE /7 ^ ANCIENT HISTORICAL RECORDS OF NORWALK, CONN. WITH A PLAN OF THE ANCIENT SETTLEMENT, AND OF THE TOWN IN 1847 C O M P I BY EDWIi, HALL, PASTOR OF THE FIR.sT CON'GREGATIONAL CHURCTT. ANDREW SELLECK, NORWALK. C(jNN.: IvisoN, Phinney, Blakeman k Co., 48 AND 50 WALKER STREET, NEW Y R K. 1865. REV. KELSON R. PEARSOH Entered according to Act of Congress, in the year 1847, by EDWIN HALL, in the Clerk',- Office of the District Court of the United States, for the District of Connecticut. ADVERTISEMENT TO THE READER. The design of the compiler of this work has not been to -write a History of Norwalk; but to copy from the Records whatever mat- ters appeared to be of any historical interest j and in all cases to let the Records speak for themselves. The genealogical registers are very imperfect ; and if any fami- lies are omitted, it is because they were not put upon the public re- cords and because the ; compiler, after repeatedly advertising, and alter some months' delay, has failed to obtain them.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconsidering Justice Gabriel Duvall's Slavery Law Opinions
    Not the Most Insignificant Justice: Reconsidering Justice Gabriel Duvall’s Slavery Law Opinions Favoring Liberty ANDREW T. FEDE Joseph Story and Gabriel Duvall began later so deaf that he could not hear a word said their careers as Supreme Court Justices on the in Court[.]”1 Others based later critiques on same day in February 1812, but the reputa- the dearth of Duvall’s published Supreme tions of these nominees of President James Court output—fifteen opinions for the Court Madison diverged widely. Story is ranked and one dissenting opinion—although they among the Court’s leading Justices. Duvall’s acknowledged that, during this era, Chief standing, in contrast, fell so far by the 1930s Justice John Marshall dominated the Court that Ernest Sutherland Bates, in his book with his collegial approach to decision The Story of the Supreme Court, labeled making and opinion writing.2 him “probably the most insignificant of all On the other hand, Irving Dilliard, who Supreme Court judges[.]” Bates implied that, wrote the entry on Duvall in The Justices at nearly sixty years of age, Duvall was too of the United States Supreme Court old when he was nominated to the Court; he 1789-1969, accused Bates of making “a thus devalued Duvall’s nearly twenty-four manifestly unfair judgment” about Duvall’s years as a Maryland lawyer, state court judge, almost twenty-three-year career on the and legislator; his two years as a United States Court.3 Indeed, Duvall deserves further Congressman; and his nine years as the first reevaluation, but not because of the recently Comptroller of the United States Treasury.
    [Show full text]
  • A 90 Day Study a History of Our Country's Judicial System The
    A 90 Day Study A History of Our Country’s Judicial System The United States Supreme Court: Landmark Decisions and the Justices Who Made Them February 20, 2017 – June 19, 2017 Featuring Essays by Constituting America’s Guest Constitutional Scholars 2 The United States Supreme Court: Landmark Decisions And The Justices Who Made Them Constitutional Scholar Essayists Steven H. Aden, Senior Counsel, Alliance Defending Freedom James D. Best, Author of Tempest at Dawn, a novel about the 1787 Constitutional Convention; Principled Action, Lessons from the Origins of the American Republic Robert Lowry Clinton, Professor and Chair Emeritus, Department of Political Science, Southern Illinois University Carbondale; Author, Marbury v. Madison; Judicial Review Daniel A. Cotter, Adjunct Professor, The John Marshall Law School; Immediate Past President, The Chicago Bar Association Marshall DeRosa, Professor of Political Science, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida Nick Dranias, President, Compact for America Educational Foundation The Honorable David Eastman, State Representative, Alaska House of Representatives; West Point graduate, former Captain, United States Army; Firefighter Richard Epstein, Inaugural Laurence A. Tisch Professor of Law, New York University School of Law; Peter and Kirstin Bedford Senior Fellow, Hoover Institution Allen C. Guelzo, Henry R. Luce Professor of the Civil War Era, and Professor of History, Gettysburg College; Author, Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation: The End of Slavery in America Joseph Knippenberg, Professor
    [Show full text]
  • The Campaign of 1777 in the Hudson Highlands
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1971 Too Little, Too Late: The Campaign of 1777 in the Hudson Highlands Robert K. Wright College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the Military History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Wright, Robert K., "Too Little, Too Late: The Campaign of 1777 in the Hudson Highlands" (1971). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539624739. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-36b0-g327 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TOO LITTLE, TOO LATE: THE CAMPAIGN OF 177? IN THE HUDSON HIGHLANDS A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History The College of William and Mar:/ in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts by Ro hert Kenn e th WrI p;h t, Jim 1 or 1971 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Approved, May 1971 Richard Maxwell Brown Bruce T. McCully Se 5 0 9 0 9 9 ii TABLE OP CONTENTS Page LIST OF MAPS . ..................................... iv ABSTRACT....................................... v CHAPTER I. GEOGRAPHY OF THE HUDSON HIGHLANDS ......... 2 CHAPTER II. 1775 ...................................... 9 CHAPTER III. 1776 .....................
    [Show full text]