The International Journal of the Platonic Tradition The International Journal ofthe Platonic Tradition 4 (2010) 114-146 brill.nl/jpt Plotinus and Magic Wendy Elgersma Helleman Religious Studies and Philosophy University of Jos, Nigeria, West Africa
[email protected] Abstract Contemporary scholarship accents incipient theurgical practice for Plotinus; this lends a certain urgency to the question of his acceptance of magic. While use of magic recorded in Porphyry’s Vita Plotini has received considerable attention, far less has been done to analyze actual discussion in the Enneads. Examination of key passages brings to light the context for discussion of magic, particularly issues of sympathy, prayer, astrology and divination. Equally important is Plotinus’ understanding of the cosmos and role of the heavenly bodies. Plotinus’ affirma- tion of the highest part of the soul as undescended, together with the claim that our soul has a common origin with the World Soul in Soul-Hypostasis, is signifi- cant for the relative unimportance he attributes to the role and effect of magic. Keywords Plotinus, magic, soul, sympathy, astrology, divination, enchantment, prayer, δαίμονες, cosmology, correspondence, analogy, mystical union. Just how did the Neoplatonists regard magic and theurgy? This topic has attracted considerable attention in the last few years.1 A number of decades have passed since A.H. Armstrong appeared to have answered successfully Merlan’s thesis on Plotinus as magician.2 Significant new scholarly work on later Neoplatonists like Iamblichus has reopened the question, particularly in the effort to establish lines of continuity between 1) Shaw (1995); Rappe (2000); Mazur (2003) and (2004).