Open Access Initiatives and Networking in the Global South Iryna Kuchma
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Scientometric Analysis
Tropical Ecology 59(3): 431–443, 2018 ISSN 0564-3295 © International Society for Tropical Ecology www.tropecol.com Global research trends in ‘Ecology’: A scientometric analysis 1* 2 ANWESHA BORTHAKUR & PARDEEP SINGH 1Centre for Studies in Science Policy, Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU), New Delhi-110067, India 2Department of Environmental Studies, PGDAV College, University of Delhi, New Delhi-110065, India Abstract: Ecological research has observed a near constant growth during the past few decades. Considering the significance and diversity of ecological research with regard to both its vastness and specificity, this paper is an attempt to map out the research activities in ‘ecology’ through a ‘scientometric analysis’ of the world research outputs. The aim was to identify and document the historical and current research trajectories in the subject. We recognize the fact that in the absence of an in-depth analysis of the trends in research, it is utterly possible that some areas of research get more than adequate attention from the global research and policy community while some equally important areas of the subject remain completely unaddressed or neglected. The study was carried out using two major databases – Scopus and SCImago for the 21 years period from 1996 to 2016 by means of a defined scientific method. Among the several interesting observations, we have found that apart from China, no countries and research institutes from the global south are listed among the top 10 research producing countries/institutes on ecology. Considering the fact that majority of the ecologically sensitive areas and biodiversity hotspots of the world are located in the developing world and have significance influences on the ecological processes across the globe, this calls for immediate attention from the research community. -
Open Computer Science
A2IC 2018 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ISSN 2678-2782 premc.org/a2ic OPEN ACCESS AT DE GRUYTER SELECTED JOURNALS 2018 ·VOLUME 8 2018 ·VOLUME 8 e-ISSN 2299–1093 OPEN COMPUTER SCIENCE e-ISSN 2391-5439 OPEN ENGINEERING is a fully peer-reviewed, open is a fully peer-reviewed, open OPEN access, electronic journal OPEN access, electronic journal COMPUTER that publishes original results ENGINEERING that publishes research in the following computer results of wide interest in SCIENCE science research areas: emerging interdisciplinary algorithms and complexity and traditional engineering theory, artificial intelligence, fields, including: electrical and bioinformatics, networking computer engineering, civil and security systems, pro- and environmental engineer- gramming languages, system ing, mechanical and aerospace and software engineering, engineering, material science theoretical foundations of and engineering. computer science. There are NO submission or www.degruyter.com/journals/eng www.degruyter.com/journals/ publication FEES. Editor-in-Chief: Editor-in-Chief: Egon L. van den Broek, Utrecht In cooperation with A2IC 2018: William F. Ritter University, The Netherlands University of Delaware, USA UPCOMING TOPICAL ISSUE: SPECIAL ISSUE on Modern Manufacturing Artificial Intelligence Technologies ISSN: 2299-1093 in Computer Science ISSN: 2391-5439 www.opencomputerscience.com www.degruyter.com/view/j/eng Guest Editors: Guest Editor: Alvaro Rubio-Largo, Jay F. Tu, Rahul Trivedi Editorial contact: Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Spain Editorial contact: [email protected] [email protected] 2018 ·VOLUME 16 2018 ·VOLUME 9 e-ISSN 2391-5455 OPEN MATHEMATICS e-ISSN 2081-4836 PALADYN. JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL ROBOTICS is a fully peer-reviewed, open access, electronic journal that PALADYN is a fully peer-reviewed, open OPEN JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL ROBOTICS access, electronic journal that publishes significant, original publishes original research MATHEMATICS and relevant works in all areas on topics broadly related to of mathematics. -
Supplementary Text and Figures
SUPPLEMENTARY TEXT John P.A. Ioannidis1, Richard Klavans2, Kevin W. Boyack2 1 Departments of Medicine, of Health Research and Policy, of Biomedical Data Science, and of Statistics, and Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), Stanford University 2 SciTech Strategies, Inc. Contents Technical note on methods 1 References 7 Figures: trends over time and effects of co-authorship 8 Survey to hyperprolific authors for calendar years 2016: text of e-mail 12 Survey to hyperprolific authors for calendar year 2016: open responses 14 Request to contribute comments sent to all listed hyperprolific authors 18 Comments contributed by hyperprolific authors 20 Acknowledgments 119 Technical note on methods An author publishing the equivalent of one full paper every 5 days will end up publishing 73 papers in a calendar year. We selected this number as a threshold to define and study outlier, hyperprolific authors. Of course, published papers may reflect the final presentation of work that has happened over many years, but focusing on calendar years allows to study peaks in productivity and to use a clearly definable time unit. 1 We identified all author records in Scopus that included 73 or more published full papers in any single calendar year between 2000 and 2016. Full papers included in our analysis are the ones classified as Articles, Conference Papers and Reviews in Scopus. All other Scopus categories of published items (Editorials, Letters, Notes, Short Surveys, Errata, and so forth) were excluded. Papers take variable amounts of effort to produce. For items such as editorials, notes, letters to the editor, in theory large numbers of publications are possible to produce by authors who have a talent, proclivity or obsession for writing; such works may occasionally be very important and influential, but they take, on average, substantially less time to produce than Articles, Conference Papers and Reviews. -
Bibliometric Analysis of Document Ow on Academic Social Networks in Web of Science
Bibliometric analysis of document ow on academic social networks in Web of Science Tatyana Busygina ( [email protected] ) State Public Scientic-Technological Library of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0329-414X Anna Yuklyaevskaya State Public Scientic-Technological Library of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9837-9423 Research Article Keywords: Scientometrics, Academic social network, Web of Science, Altmetrics, Documents co-citation analysis, co-word analysis, CiteSpace Posted Date: February 3rd, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-196204/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/34 Abstract Analysis of a document array on academic social networks (ASNs) in Web of Science for the period from 2005 to 2020 was carried out with use of analytical services data of the WoS and CiteSpace (the program for visualization of patterns and trends in scientic literature). The following parameters of the array were analyzed: publication dynamics; document types structure; countries, organizations and authors leading in the number of publications; thematic categories to which documents of the array are assigned; publications (journals, monographs) in which the documents of the array are published; most cited publications. An increase in the number of publications on the ASNs in WoS was established since 2005. The largest number of ASNs studies is conducted in the USA (University of Pittsburgh), UK (Wolverhampton University, Manchester University), China, Spain (University of Granada), Germany (Max Planck Society for Scientic Research), Canada, India and the Netherlands (Leiden University). -
Do Authors Comply with Mandates for Open Access?
COMMENT GOVERNANCE Make more ART Pre-Raphaelites LAB LIFE Memoir of PUBLISHING Engage more voices use of the patenting system interpreted discoveries neuroscientist and equality in the debate over Europe’s to regulate gene editing p.486 of a fecund age p.490 advocate Ben Barres p.492 open-access plan p.494 ILLUSTRATION BY SÉBASTIEN THIBAULT SÉBASTIEN BY ILLUSTRATION Do authors comply with mandates for open access? The first large-scale analysis of compliance with open-access rules reveals that rates vary greatly by funder, report Vincent Larivière and Cassidy R. Sugimoto. ast month, European research funders is open access1–4. Here, we report the first They highlight the importance to open access collectively called for research publica- large-scale analysis of compliance, focusing of enforcement, timeliness and infrastructure. tions to be made free, fully and immedi- on 12 selected funding agencies. Biblio metric And they underline the need to establish sus- Lately; so far, 14 funders have signed up. Before data are fraught with idiosyncrasies (see tainable and equitable systems as the financial that, at least 50 funders and 700 research insti- ‘Analysis methods’), but the trends are clear. burdens for science publishing shift from tutions worldwide had already mandated Of the more than 1.3 million papers we research libraries to authors’ research funds. some form of open access for the work they identified as subject to the selected funders’ support. Federally funded agencies and insti- open-access mandates, we found that some FREE FOR ALL tutions argue that taxpayers should be able two-thirds were indeed freely available to read. -
ACS Photonics 23304022
Sourcerecord id Source Title (Medline-sourced journals are indicated in Green) Print-ISSN E-ISSN Titles indicated in bold red do not meet the Scopus quality criteria anymore and therefore Scopus discontinued the forward capturing 21100229836 3D Research 20926731 18665 ABB Review 10133119 22394 ABU Technical Review 01266209 4700152798 ACM Journal on Emerging Technologies in Computing Systems 15504832 18662 ACM Transactions on Design Automation of Electronic Systems 10844309 21100368207 ACS Photonics 23304022 13884 Acta Technica CSAV (Ceskoslovensk Akademie Ved) 00017043 18673 Active and Passive Electronic Components 08827516 15635031 19700186738 Ad-Hoc and Sensor Wireless Networks 15519899 15520633 18000156702 Advances in Electrical and Computer Engineering 15827445 18447600 60241 Advances in Electrical and Electronic Engineering 13361376 18043119 18677 Advances in Imaging and Electron Physics 10765670 21100286862 Advances in Natural Sciences: Nanoscience and Nanotechnology 20436262 5600152819 Advances in OptoElectronics 1687563X 16875648 4800152315 Advances in Radio Science 16849965 24117 Advancing Microelectronics 17683 AEU - International Journal of Electronics and Communications 14348411 17722 Annales des Telecommunications 00034347 13200 Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal 10544887 50094 Archives of Electrical Engineering 14274221 82643 Australian Journal of Electrical and Electronics Engineering 1448837X 24909 Automatica 00051098 24932 Automatisierungstechnik 01782312 13218 Bandaoti Guangdian/Semiconductor Optoelectronics -
SJR Best Quartile Title Issn SJR H Index Country Publisher Q1 Nature
SJR Best Title Issn SJR H index Country Publisher Quartile Q1 Nature Biotechnology 15461696, 10870156 15,358 445 United Kingdom Nature Publishing Group Q1 Nature Materials 14764660, 14761122 14,344 483 United Kingdom Nature Publishing Group Q1 Nature Nanotechnology 17483387, 17483395 14,308 353 United Kingdom Nature Publishing Group Q1 Advanced Materials 09359648, 15214095 10,707 527 United States Wiley-Blackwell Q1 Nature Electronics 25201131 9,569 47 United Kingdom Nature Publishing Group Materials Science and Engineering: R: Q1 0927796X 8,366 146 Netherlands Elsevier BV Reports Q1 Materials Today 13697021 8,071 177 Netherlands Elsevier Institute of Electrical and Electronics Q1 IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials 1553877X 6,605 197 United States Engineers Inc. Q1 Nature Biomedical Engineering 2157846X 5,961 56 United States Nature Publishing Group Q1 Nano Energy 22112855 5,764 171 Netherlands Elsevier BV American Association for the Q1 Science Robotics 24709476 5,619 50 United States Advancement of Science Q1 Nano Today 17480132 5,586 143 Netherlands Elsevier Q1 ACS Nano 1936086X, 19360851 5,554 382 United States American Chemical Society Q1 Advanced Science 21983844 5,388 100 Germany Wiley-VCH Verlag Q1 Nano Letters 15306992, 15306984 4,853 488 United States American Chemical Society Q1 Cement and Concrete Research 88846 4,628 215 United Kingdom Elsevier Ltd. Q1 Materials Horizons 20516347, 20516355 4,322 81 United Kingdom Royal Society of Chemistry Q1 Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering 15239829, 15454274 4,142 133 United -
Incites Lunedi’ 26 Ottobre 14.30-15.30 Questa Sessione Tratta Le Nozioni Basiche Di Utilizzo Di Incites
NOZIONI DI BASE InCites Lunedi’ 26 ottobre 14.30-15.30 Questa sessione tratta le nozioni basiche di utilizzo di InCites. InCites dataset: come e quando viene creato e dove CNR trovare le informazioni relative. Come esportare un set di dati da Web of Science a InCites e come visualizzare un set di papers da InCites su Web of Science. Altre possibilità di caricamento di un dataset. Come funzionano i filtri e come selezionare i vari indicatori. Come visualizzare i diversi tipi di grafici, come salvare e/o condividere un “tile”. Come esportare le tabelle, i grafici e le metriche a livello di articolo. Registrazione → LE PRINCIPALI CARATTERISTICHE DEI VARI MODULI E DEI SYSTEM REPORTS Martedi’ 27 ottobre 14.30-15.30 Questa sessione prende in considerazione le principali caratteristiche dei 6 moduli Explorer e dei due tipi di report di sistema. Le differenze tra i vari moduli e come è possibile passare da un modulo all’altro (refocus). Le unificazioni sottostanti (organizzazioni, editori, agenzie di finanziamento): limiti e caratteristiche. Le baselines, ovverosia come crearsi un proprio benchmark. La classificazione per aree geografiche NUTS. Limiti ed esempi. Le collaborazioni internazionali e con l’industria. Le analisi sull’Open Access. Registrazione → LA VALUTAZIONE DI UN PAPER, DI UN AUTORE O DI UNA ISTITUZIONE Mercoledi’ 28 ottobre 11.00-12.00 Questa sessione presenta l’utilizzo dei dati di Web of Science Core Collection per le valutazioni: il concetto di citazione (e indicatore) normalizzato, l’importanza della categorizzazione, i principali ranking internazionali, la passata e la presente VQR, i percentili, la posizione degli autori, i dati per la ASN (con ESCI) e l’analisi dei profili personali, il problema delle autocitazioni, i Web Services. -
Working on Scopus.Com What We Will Do for You in 2021
Working on Scopus.com What we will do for you in 2021 Marcel Vonder Sr Product Director, Scopus 2 Increase success for users in their most important tasks! Size of bubble indicates the proportion of visits undertaking this task (106-932) MOST Scopus.com visitors were asked about the purpose of their visit and how successful their SUCCESSFUL visit was overall. (R12M, N=3024) Refer to academic performance Identify/assess/track potential metrics in reviewing an research collaborators or application commercial partners Track my own performance Track my peers or colleagues Review relevant scholarly output Choose a reviewer for a Identify an appropriate journal to on a topic, in reviewing a manuscript submit my manuscript to manuscript Keep up-to-date with the latest developments in my own field Assess specific published papers Find inspiration for new Confirm ideas for Obtain information on a subject research/ product or research/products or innovations outside my area of expertise innovation idea are novel Search for a specific article or set of articles VISITSUCCESS Perform bibliometric analysis on a set of publications, authors, Identify leading journals in a etc particular research area Gain an in-depth understanding of a topic within my field LEAST LOW HIGH SUCCESSFUL Importance of task (NPS from users that undertake this task) Use cases with n<100 excluded Enriching our Researcher Profiles Increasingly helping users look at the world in researcher centric way 3 SCOPUS REDESIGN Author Profile page (launched in Q3, 2020) Objectives: 1. Easier to scan and clearer call-to-actions 2. Drive users to the Author Feedback Wizard to improve our overall data quality 3. -
Piracy of Scientific Papers in Latin America: an Analysis of Sci-Hub Usage Data
Developing Latin America Piracy of scientific papers in Latin America: An analysis of Sci-Hub usage data Juan D. Machin-Mastromatteo Alejandro Uribe-Tirado Maria E. Romero-Ortiz This article was originally published as: Machin-Mastromatteo, J.D., Uribe-Tirado, A., and Romero-Ortiz, M. E. (2016). Piracy of scientific papers in Latin America: An analysis of Sci-Hub usage data. Information Development, 32(5), 1806–1814. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0266666916671080 Abstract Sci-Hub hosts pirated copies of 51 million scientific papers from commercial publishers. This article presents the site’s characteristics, it criticizes that it might be perceived as a de-facto component of the Open Access movement, it replicates an analysis published in Science using its available usage data, but limiting it to Latin America, and presents implications caused by this site for information professionals, universities and libraries. Keywords: Sci-Hub, piracy, open access, scientific articles, academic databases, serials crisis Scientific articles are vital for students, professors and researchers in universities, research centers and other knowledge institutions worldwide. When academic publishing started, academies, institutions and professional associations gathered articles, assessed their quality, collected them in journals, printed and distributed its copies; with the added difficulty of not having digital technologies. Producing journals became unsustainable for some professional societies, so commercial scientific publishers started appearing and assumed printing, sales and distribution on their behalf, while academics retained the intellectual tasks. Elsevier, among the first publishers, emerged to cover operations costs and profit from sales, now it is part of an industry that grew from the process of scientific communication; a 10 billion US dollar business (Murphy, 2016). -
Open Research Data: SNSF Monitoring Report 2017-2018
Open Research Data: SNSF monitoring report 2017-2018 Katrin Milzow, Martin von Arx, Corn´eliaSommer, Julia Cahenzli, and Lionel Periniy February 2020 Abstract The Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) introduced its policy on Open Research Data (ORD) in 2017. This monitoring report gives an overview of the first experiences and provides an analysis of the adherence of researchers to the ORD policy. Data collected in this report come from the applications funded in the project funding scheme, some career funding schemes, and the Sin- ergia programme between October 2017 and December 2018. The report provides an analysis of the plausibility of the data management plans (DMPs), the requested costs for granting access to research data and the characteristics of the mentioned data repositories. Keywords: Open Research Data, Data Management Plan, Data sharing, Data repositories, Science Policy. y Open Research Data Group, Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF). E-mail address: [email protected] Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 ORD Policy and Processes 2 2.1 ORD Policy . .2 2.1.1 Core Principles . .2 2.1.2 FAIR Data Principles . .3 2.2 Processes . .3 2.2.1 Costs for Granting Access to Research Data . .3 2.2.2 Assessment of the DMP . .4 3 Data 4 4 Descriptive Analysis 4 4.1 Costs for Granting Access to Research Data . .4 4.2 Overall Assessment of the DMPs . .5 4.3 Detailed Assessment of the DMPs . .5 4.4 Data Repositories . .7 5 Conclusion 10 6 Challenges and Perspectives 11 7 References 12 1 SNSF monitoring report Open Research Data 1 Introduction The Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) introduced its policy on Open Research Data (ORD) in 2017. -
Open Engineering Degruyter.Com Uses Cookies to Store Information That Enables Us to Optimize Our Website and Make Browsing More Comfortable for You
19.11.2018 Open Engineering degruyter.com uses cookies to store information that enables us to optimize our website and make browsing more comfortable for you. To learn more about the use of cookies, please read our privacy policy. OK (0) Open Engineering formerly Central European Journal of Engineering Editor-in-Chief: Ritter, William 1 Issue per year CiteScore 2017: 0.70 SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2017: 0.211 Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP) 2017: 0.787 OPEN ACCESS Online ISSN 2391-5439 See all formats and pricing Print Flyer › Get eTOC Alert › › Get New Article Alert › More options … Volume Issue Page GO Select Volume and Issue Overview https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/eng 1/18 19.11.2018 Open Engineering Opendegruyter Engineering.com uses publishes cookies to research store information results thatof wide enables interest us to optimize in emerging our website interdisciplinary and make browsing and traditional more comfortable engineering for you. fields, To learn including: more about the use of cookies, please read our privacy policy. OK electrical and computer engineering, civil and environmental engineering, mechanical and aerospace engineering, material science and engineering. The journal is designed to facilitate the exchange of innovative and interdisciplinary ideas between researchers from different countries. Open Engineering is a peer-reviewed, English language journal. Researchers from non-English speaking regions are provided with free language correction by scientists who are native speakers. Additionally,