The New Red List of Bulgarian Birds: Does the Number Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The New Red List of Bulgarian Birds: Does the Number Of MICHEV T., BOEV Z., KAMBOUROVA N. 2011. The new Red List of Bulgarian birds: does the number of endangered bird species increase? National Scientific Conference “Man and the Universe”, 06-08.10.2011, City of Smolian, Bulgaria, a report. THE NEW RED LIST OF BULGARIAN BIRDS: DOES THE NUMBER OF ENDANGERED BIRD SPECIES INCREASE? Tanyo MICHEV 1, Zlatozar BOEV 2, Nevena KAMBOUROVA 3 st Abstract. Since the composition of the 1 Red List of the birds in Bulgaria (BOJEW , MITSCHEW 1980) over 30 years have passed during which the conservation status of the birds has gone through considerable changes. The new Red list contains 155 bird species from the following categories: Regionally Extinct (REX) – 10; Critically Endangered (CR) – 32; Endangered (EN) – 45; Vulnerable (VU) – 53; Near to Threatened (NT) – 2; Local Concern (LC) – 7; Data Deficient (DD) – 6. The number of the endangered species has increased up from 28.2% to 38.1%. The speed of the growing up process is 0.89 %/year or 0.69 species/year. The conclusion is that conservation efforts have to be basically directed to species from the category “Critically Endangered”. Almost half of the birds in the new Red List are conventional Tertiary relicts. The Pleistocene relicts are eight time less numerous – just about 6.45% of the species. Among them the species which inhabit mountain-hill landscapes predominate. The predominant part of the species belongs to 5 types of habitats. The largest number of the species (1/3 or 31.6 %) inhabits wetlands in the inner part of the country. Forests take 2nd place with 38 species (or 24.5 %) and rocky habitats and caves rank third place with 23 species (or 14.8 %). Twenty-three zoogeographical types are presented in the new Red List proving the all- embracing process of the impoverishment of the recent Bulgarian avifauna. The birds of Paleactic distribution are the most numerous zoogeographical type, presented by 48 species, 1 Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research – Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 2, Yurii Gagarin Street, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria; e-mail: [email protected] 2 National Museum of Natural History - Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1, Blvd. Tsar Osvoboditel, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria; e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] 3 Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research 3 - Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 2, Yurii Gagarin Street, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria; e-mail: [email protected] followed by the Holarctic, European, Cosmopolitian, Turkestanian-Mediterranean and Old World types (10-11 species each). The Palearctic type is the most numerous also within each separate conservation category. In Bulgaria as a whole the birds are most endangered in comparison with Greece and Romania. Introduction st The 1 Red List of Bulgarian ornithofauna was published by BOJEW , MITSCHEW (1980). It contains 100 species which are grouped in three categories: extinct, endangered and rare. In the subsequently published “Red Data Book of People’s Republic of Bulgaria” (BOTEV , PESHEV 1985) each species is presented with a short article, a map and a drawing. Since the publishing of the 1st Red List 30 years have passed during which the conservation status of the birds of the Bulgarian ornithofauna has gone through considerable changes. The tracing and analysis of these changes are the aims of the present article. The new Red List was given to professional ornithologists and experienced amateurs who have prepared specialized articles for particular species. The upcoming event is their release as a separate volume from the 2nd edition of the three-volume “Red Data Book of the Republic of Bulgaria”. Methods When the 1st Red List was prepared the categories in it were not consistent with the categories of IUCN which were adopted subsequently. That sort of difference in the assessment of conservation status, to a certain extent, bothered the objective comparison with: 1) the present new Red List; and 2) the bird species status in neighboring countries of Bulgaria or from different parts of species range. The new Red List presented here follows the categories of IUCN and corresponds to their application in the other countries. The Latin and Bulgarian names of the birds and their arrangement follow the recommendation of the Bulgarian National Rarities Committee (BUNARCO 2009). 2 Results st In the 1 Red List of Bulgaria (B OJEW , MITSCHEW 1980) 100 bird species are included out of all 354 species, established at that time. They represent 28.2 % from the species composition of the Bulgarian ornithofauna. The new Red List contains 155 bird species ( see Appendix) or 38.1 % of all 406 species reported for Bulgaria nowadays (BUNARCO 2009). Their belonging to different taxa (orders) is represented in Table 1. Obviously, the most endangered are two groups of orders: diurnal birds of prey (Accipitriformes, Falconiformes) and water birds (Podicipediformes, Ciconiiformes, Gruiformes, and Pelecaniformes). The Galliformes as main hunting object is also with quite unfavorable conservation status. The species from the new Red List are assigned to 7 IUCN categories (Table 2). The proportion between the separate categories is represented on Fig. 1. The most numerous category is “Vulnerable”, followed by “Endangered”, Critically Endangered (CR) and s. o. The number of species in the new Red List is decreasing with the increasing of the threat degree (Fig. 2). As could be seen also from this figure, thirty-two species from the category “Critically Endangered” are closest to the boundary of extinction as breeding species in Bulgaria. Depending on the character and efficiency of the measures which will be taken for their conservation in the next years these species will either “cross” the red line (and will be put in category “Regionally Extinct”) or they will be returned to more slightly threatened category. With this conclusion we direct the attention of the nature conservation community in the country exactly to this group (“Critically Endangered”) where the conservation efforts have to be concentrated. The “Critically Endangered” category as well as the other categories is distinguished by some distinctive characteristics which are considered further down. Different categories own some characteristics which are considered further down. Regionally Extinct Species (REX) Ten species from 5 orders are listed in this category. They do not breed on the territory of the country for many years. Three species are globally threatened (Table 3) and their names are written in bold type. Two species (Tetrao tetrix and Phasianus colchicus ) are resident and the probability for recovery of their breeding population is insignificant without human intervention. Conversely, all reasons for their present unfavorable conservation status are of 3 local character and these reasons are subject to influence in the bound of the country. All the other species nowadays are found incidentally on the territory of the country or more regularly during the migration and winter time. Some of the species try to breed again or even there are records for successful breeding ( Aegypius monachus and Pelecanus onocrotalus ). The probability of the Common Crane ( Grus grus ) to return as breeding species increase a lot with the restoration of Dragomansko Blato after long years of semi-drain condition. There is also a potential possibility for the recovering of Bearded Vulture (Gypaetus barbatus ) thanks to the elaboration of European and national nature conservation projects for its reintroduction in parts of its former range in the country. Critically Threatened Species (CR) In this category 32 species from 11 orders are listed (Table 4). Charadriiformes is represented with large number of species (8) and after them comes Anseriformes (5 species). Almost one- third of the species are globally threatened. In the table the species names of globally threatened birds are written out in bold type. This category is situated very close to the red line which marks the critical boundary of extinction (Fig. 1) and has a key and crucial role for the future of Bulgarian ornithofauna. In this category there are five species which are on the edge of survival as breeding birds in the country: Aquila heliaca, Falco naumanni, Falco vespertinus, Falco cherrug and Otis tarda. For three of them (Aquila heliaca , Falco cherrug and Falco vespertinus ) nowadays there are projects for recovering of their populations. Endangered Species (EN) In this category there are 45 species from 14 orders (Table 5). Charadriiformes is represented with a largest number of species (9) and after that comes Anseriformes (6) and Passeriformes (6). Here there is only one globally threatened species (Oxyura leucocephala ). Despite the nature conservation efforts one species ( Neophron percnopterus ) has fast decreasing population and there is a real risk to disappear as a breeding bird from the territory of Bulgaria. This necessitates its moving to the previous category of critically threatened species. Vulnerable Species (VU) Fifty three species of the new Red List belong to this category (Table 6). Here the passerines and raptors are represented with the largest number of species. Four bird species (given in bold type) are globally threatened. Near to Threatened Species (NT) 4 In this category there are two species: Rallus aquaticus of Gruiformes and Corvus corax of Passeriformes. Species with Local Concern (LC) Seven species are listed in this category. Again the largest number of species falls into Charadriiformes (Table 7). Data Deficient Species (DD) Insufficiently studied are 6 species or 1.5 % from Bulgarian ornithofauna (Table 8). There is one globally threatened species: Marmaronetta angustirostris from Anseriformes (its name is in bold type). Excluded species from the First Red List st Eight species presented in the 1 Red List (BOJEW , MITSCHEW 1980) are not listed in the new Red List (Table 9). One of them is Great Cormorant ( Phalacrocorax carbo ) – it is not included in the New Red List due to the considerable increase of its number during the breeding season, migration and winter.
Recommended publications
  • Fresh- and Brackish-Water Cold-Tolerant Species of Southern Europe: Migrants from the Paratethys That Colonized the Arctic
    water Review Fresh- and Brackish-Water Cold-Tolerant Species of Southern Europe: Migrants from the Paratethys That Colonized the Arctic Valentina S. Artamonova 1, Ivan N. Bolotov 2,3,4, Maxim V. Vinarski 4 and Alexander A. Makhrov 1,4,* 1 A. N. Severtzov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119071 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] 2 Laboratory of Molecular Ecology and Phylogenetics, Northern Arctic Federal University, 163002 Arkhangelsk, Russia; [email protected] 3 Federal Center for Integrated Arctic Research, Russian Academy of Sciences, 163000 Arkhangelsk, Russia 4 Laboratory of Macroecology & Biogeography of Invertebrates, Saint Petersburg State University, 199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Analysis of zoogeographic, paleogeographic, and molecular data has shown that the ancestors of many fresh- and brackish-water cold-tolerant hydrobionts of the Mediterranean region and the Danube River basin likely originated in East Asia or Central Asia. The fish genera Gasterosteus, Hucho, Oxynoemacheilus, Salmo, and Schizothorax are examples of these groups among vertebrates, and the genera Magnibursatus (Trematoda), Margaritifera, Potomida, Microcondylaea, Leguminaia, Unio (Mollusca), and Phagocata (Planaria), among invertebrates. There is reason to believe that their ancestors spread to Europe through the Paratethys (or the proto-Paratethys basin that preceded it), where intense speciation took place and new genera of aquatic organisms arose. Some of the forms that originated in the Paratethys colonized the Mediterranean, and overwhelming data indicate that Citation: Artamonova, V.S.; Bolotov, representatives of the genera Salmo, Caspiomyzon, and Ecrobia migrated during the Miocene from I.N.; Vinarski, M.V.; Makhrov, A.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Roacht1 Extquoteright S Mouse-Tailed Dormouse Myomimus
    Published by Associazione Teriologica Italiana Volume 23 (2): 67–71, 2012 Hystrix, the Italian Journal of Mammalogy Available online at: http://www.italian-journal-of-mammalogy.it/article/view/4779/pdf doi:10.4404/hystrix-23.2-4779 Research Article Roach’s mouse-tailed dormouse Myomimus roachi distribution and conservation in Bulgaria Boyan Milcheva,∗, Valeri Georgievb aUniversity of Forestry; Wildlife Management Department, 10 Kl. Ochridski Blvd., BG-1765 Sofia, Bulgaria bMinistry of Environment and Water, 22 Maria Luisa Blvd., BG-1000 Sofia, Bulgaria Keywords: Abstract Roach’s mouse-tailed dormouse Myomimus roachi The Roach’s mouse-tailed dormice (Myomimus roachi) is an endangered distribution mammal in Europe with poorly known distribution and biology in Bulgaria. conservation Cranial remains of 15 specimens were determined among 30532 mammals Bulgaria in Barn Owl (Tyto alba) pellets in 35 localities from 2000 to 2008 and 32941 mammals in Eagle Owl (Bubo bubo) pellets in 59 localities from 1988 to 2011 in SE Bulgaria. This dormouse was present with single specimens in 11 localities and whit 4 specimens in one locality. It is one of the rarest Article history: mammals in the region that forms only up to 1% by number of mammalian Received: 19 January 2012 prey in the more numerous pellet samples. The existing protected areas Accepted: 3 April 2012 ecological network covers six out of 15 (40%) localities where the species has been detected in the last two decades. We discuss the necessity of designation of new Natura 2000 zones for the protection of the Roach’s mouse-tailed dormouse in Bulgaria.
    [Show full text]
  • THE American Museum Journal
    T ///^7; >jVvvscu/n o/ 1869 THE LIBRARY THE American Museum Journal VOLUME VII, 1907 NEW YORK: PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY 1907 Committee of Publication EDMUND OTIS HOVF.Y, Ediior. FRANK M. ( IIAPMAN ] LOUIS P. GHATACAP \ .l<lris-on/ linanl WILLIAM K. GREGOIlvJ THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY. 77th Street and Central Park West, New York. OFFICERS AND COMMITTEES PRESIDEXT MORRIS K. JESUP FIRST VICE-PRESIDENT SECOND VICE-PRESIDENT J. PIERPONT MORGAN HENRY F. OSBORN TREASURER SECRETARY CHARLES LANIER J. HAMPDEN ROBB ASSISTANT SECRETARY AND DIRECTOR ASSISTANT TREASURER HERMON C. BUMPUS GEORGE H. SHERWOOD BOARD OF TRUSTEES Class of 1907 D. O. :\IILLS ALBERT S. BICKMORE ARCHIBALD ROGERS CORNELIUS C. CUYLER ADRIAN ISELIN, Jr. Class of 1908 H. o. have:\ieyer Frederick e. hyde A. I). JUHJJAIU) GEORCiE S. BOWDOIN (TEVELANl) H. DOIXJE Class of 1909 MORRIS K. JESUP J. PIERPONT MORGAN JOSEPH H. CHOATE GEORGE G. HAVEN HENRY F. OSBORN Class of 1910 J. HAMPDEN ROBB PERCY R. PYNE ARTHUR CURTISS JAMES Class of 1911 CHARLES LANIER WILLIAISI ROCKEFELLER ANSON W. HARD GUSTAV E. KISSEL SETH LOW Scientific Staff DIRECTOR Hermon C. Bumpus, Ph.D., Sc. D. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION Prof. Albert S. Bickmore, B. S., Ph.D., LL.D., Curator Emeritus George H. Shehwood, A.B., A.M., Curator DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND INVERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY Prof. R. P. Whitfield, A.M., Curator Edmund Otis Hovey, A.B., Ph.D., Associate Curator DEPARTMENT OF MAMMALOGY AND ORNITHOLOGY Prof. J. A. Allen, Ph.D., Curator Frank M. Chapman, Associate Curator DEPARTMENT OF VERTEBRATE PALAEONTOLOGY Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    Threatened Birds of Asia: The BirdLife International Red Data Book Editors N. J. COLLAR (Editor-in-chief), A. V. ANDREEV, S. CHAN, M. J. CROSBY, S. SUBRAMANYA and J. A. TOBIAS Maps by RUDYANTO and M. J. CROSBY Principal compilers and data contributors ■ BANGLADESH P. Thompson ■ BHUTAN R. Pradhan; C. Inskipp, T. Inskipp ■ CAMBODIA Sun Hean; C. M. Poole ■ CHINA ■ MAINLAND CHINA Zheng Guangmei; Ding Changqing, Gao Wei, Gao Yuren, Li Fulai, Liu Naifa, Ma Zhijun, the late Tan Yaokuang, Wang Qishan, Xu Weishu, Yang Lan, Yu Zhiwei, Zhang Zhengwang. ■ HONG KONG Hong Kong Bird Watching Society (BirdLife Affiliate); H. F. Cheung; F. N. Y. Lock, C. K. W. Ma, Y. T. Yu. ■ TAIWAN Wild Bird Federation of Taiwan (BirdLife Partner); L. Liu Severinghaus; Chang Chin-lung, Chiang Ming-liang, Fang Woei-horng, Ho Yi-hsian, Hwang Kwang-yin, Lin Wei-yuan, Lin Wen-horn, Lo Hung-ren, Sha Chian-chung, Yau Cheng-teh. ■ INDIA Bombay Natural History Society (BirdLife Partner Designate) and Sálim Ali Centre for Ornithology and Natural History; L. Vijayan and V. S. Vijayan; S. Balachandran, R. Bhargava, P. C. Bhattacharjee, S. Bhupathy, A. Chaudhury, P. Gole, S. A. Hussain, R. Kaul, U. Lachungpa, R. Naroji, S. Pandey, A. Pittie, V. Prakash, A. Rahmani, P. Saikia, R. Sankaran, P. Singh, R. Sugathan, Zafar-ul Islam ■ INDONESIA BirdLife International Indonesia Country Programme; Ria Saryanthi; D. Agista, S. van Balen, Y. Cahyadin, R. F. A. Grimmett, F. R. Lambert, M. Poulsen, Rudyanto, I. Setiawan, C. Trainor ■ JAPAN Wild Bird Society of Japan (BirdLife Partner); Y. Fujimaki; Y. Kanai, H.
    [Show full text]
  • Listing Five Foreign Bird Species in Colombia and Ecuador, South America, As Endangered Throughout Their Range; Final Rule
    Vol. 78 Tuesday, No. 209 October 29, 2013 Part IV Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Listing Five Foreign Bird Species in Colombia and Ecuador, South America, as Endangered Throughout Their Range; Final Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:44 Oct 28, 2013 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\29OCR4.SGM 29OCR4 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES4 64692 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR endangered or threatened we are proposed for these five foreign bird required to publish in the Federal species as endangered, following careful Fish and Wildlife Service Register a proposed rule to list the consideration of all comments we species and, within 1 year of received during the public comment 50 CFR Part 17 publication of the proposed rule, a final periods. rule to add the species to the Lists of [Docket No. FWS–R9–IA–2009–12; III. Costs and Benefits 4500030115] Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants. On July 7, 2009, we We have not analyzed the costs or RIN 1018–AV75 published a proposed rule in which we benefits of this rulemaking action determined that the blue-billed because the Act precludes consideration Endangered and Threatened Wildlife curassow, brown-banded antpitta, Cauca of such impacts on listing and delisting and Plants; Listing Five Foreign Bird guan, gorgeted wood-quail, and determinations. Instead, listing and Species in Colombia and Ecuador, Esmeraldas woodstar currently face delisting decisions are based solely on South America, as Endangered numerous threats and warrant listing the best scientific and commercial Throughout Their Range under the Act as endangered species (74 information available regarding the AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, FR 32308).
    [Show full text]
  • European Red List of Birds
    European Red List of Birds Compiled by BirdLife International Published by the European Commission. opinion whatsoever on the part of the European Commission or BirdLife International concerning the legal status of any country, Citation: Publications of the European Communities. Design and layout by: Imre Sebestyén jr. / UNITgraphics.com Printed by: Pannónia Nyomda Picture credits on cover page: Fratercula arctica to continue into the future. © Ondrej Pelánek All photographs used in this publication remain the property of the original copyright holder (see individual captions for details). Photographs should not be reproduced or used in other contexts without written permission from the copyright holder. Available from: to your questions about the European Union Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) Certain mobile telephone operators do not allow access to 00 800 numbers or these calls may be billed Published by the European Commission. A great deal of additional information on the European Union is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu). Cataloguing data can be found at the end of this publication. ISBN: 978-92-79-47450-7 DOI: 10.2779/975810 © European Union, 2015 Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. Printed in Hungary. European Red List of Birds Consortium iii Table of contents Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................................................................1 Executive summary ...................................................................................................................................................5 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Corvids and Their Presence in the Neogene and the Quaternary in the Carpathian Basin
    Ornis Hungarica 2020. 28(1): 121–168. DOI: 10.2478/orhu-2020-0009 Evolution of Corvids and their Presence in the Neogene and the Quaternary in the Carpathian Basin Jenő (Eugen) KESSLER Received: September 09, 2019 – Revised: February 12, 2020 – Accepted: February 18, 2020 Kessler, J. (E.) 2020. Evolution of Corvids and their Presence in the Neogene and the Quater- nary in the Carpathian Basin. – Ornis Hungarica 28(1): 121–168. DOI: 10.2478/orhu-2020-0009 Abstract: Corvids are the largest songbirds in Europe. They are known in the avian fauna of Europe from the Miocene, the beginning of the Neogene, and are currently represented by 11 species. Due to their size, they occur more frequently among fossilized material than other types of songbirds, and thus have been examined to the largest extent. In the current article, we present their known evolution and their fossilized taxa in Europe and examine the osteology of extant species. Keywords: Corvidae, Neogene, Quaternary, Europe, Carpathian Basin, osteology Összefoglalás: A varjúfélék a legnagyobb termetű, Európában is elterjedt énekesmadarak. A kontinens madárfau- nájában a neogén elejétől, a miocénból ismertek, és jelenleg 11 fajjal vannak képviselve. Termetük következtében gyakrabban előfordulnak a fosszilis anyagban, mint a többi énekesmadár típus, és ennek következtében nagyobb mértékben is tanulmányozták őket. Jelen tanulmányban bemutatjuk az ismert európai evolúciójukat és fosszilis taxonjaikat, és foglalkozunk a recens fajok csonttanával is. Kulcsszavak: Corvidae, neogén, negyedidőszak, Európa, Kárpát-medence, csonttan Department of Paleontology, Eötvös Loránd University, 1117 Budapest, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/c, Hungary, e-mail: [email protected] Introduction About half of the current avian species – if not more – consists of songbirds, which are dis- tributed all around the world apart from Antarctica with a large number of specimens.
    [Show full text]
  • LIFE and European Mammals Mammals European and LIFE
    NATURE LIFE and European Mammals Improving their conservation status LIFE Focus I LIFE and European Mammals: Improving their conservation status EUROPEAN COMMISSION ENVIRONMENT DIRecTORATE-GENERAL LIFE (“The Financial Instrument for the Environment”) is a programme launched by the European Commission and coordinated by the Environment Directorate-General (LIFE Units - E.3. and E.4.). The contents of the publication “LIFE and European Mammals: Improving their conservation status” do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the institutions of the European Union. Authors: João Pedro Silva (Nature expert), András Demeter (DG Environment), Justin Toland, Wendy Jones, Jon Eldridge, Tim Hudson, Eamon O’Hara, Christophe Thévignot (AEIDL, Communications Team Coordinator). Managing Editor: Angelo Salsi (European Commission, DG Environment, LIFE Unit). LIFE Focus series coordination: Simon Goss (DG Environment, LIFE Communications Coordinator), Evelyne Jussiant (DG Environment, Communications Coordinator). The following people also worked on this issue: Frank Vassen (DG Environment). Production: Monique Braem. Graphic design: Daniel Renders, Anita Cortés (AEIDL). Acknowledgements: Thanks to all LIFE project beneficiaries who contributed comments, photos and other useful material for this report. Photos: Unless otherwise specified; photos are from the respective projects. Cover photo: www. luis-ferreira.com; Tiit Maran; LIFE03 NAT/F/000104. HOW TO OBTAIN EU PUBLICATIONS Free publications: • via EU Bookshop (http://bookshop.europa.eu); • at the European Commission’s representations or delegations. You can obtain their contact details on the Internet (http://ec.europa.eu) or by sending a fax to +352 2929-42758. Priced publications: • via EU Bookshop (http://bookshop.europa.eu). Priced subscriptions (e.g. annual series of the Official Journal of the European Union and reports of cases before the Court of Justice of the European Union): • via one of the sales agents of the Publications Office of the European Union (http://publications.europa.eu/ others/agents/index_en.htm).
    [Show full text]
  • DIVERSITY of BIRDS ACROSS LAND USE and HABITAT GRADIENTS in FORESTS, RUBBER AGROFORESTS and RUBBER PLANTATIONS of NORTH SUMATRA Asep Ayat1,* and Hesti L
    Indonesian Journal of Forestry Research Vol. 2, No. 2, October 2015, 103-120 ISSN: 2355-7079 / E-ISSN: 2406-8195 DIVERSITY OF BIRDS ACROSS LAND USE AND HABITAT GRADIENTS IN FORESTS, RUBBER AGROFORESTS AND RUBBER PLANTATIONS OF NORTH SUMATRA Asep Ayat1,* and Hesti L. Tata2 1Burung Indonesia, Jalan Dadali 32, Bogor 16161, Indonesia 2Forest Research and Development Center, Jl. Gunung Batu 5, Bogor, Indonesia Received: 31 March 2014, Revised: 10 May 2014, Accepted: 11 October 2015 DIVERSITY OF BIRDS ACROSS LAND USE AND HABITAT GRADIENTS IN FORESTS, RUBBER AGROFORESTS AND RUBBER PLANTATIONS OF NORTH SUMATRA. Birds play a pivotal role in the ecosystem, but in disturbed areas their roles may be limited due to the changes of their natural habitats. This paper studies the birds' habitats in Simalungun and Asahan Districts, North Sumatra. The study was conducted in four habitats: natural forest, rubber agroforests, rubber monoculture plantations and emplacement areas. The birds were observed using descriptive survey methods by implementing a quick biodiversity survey, data were collected along one km transect. The results showed that in total, 142 species of birds from 42 families were observed in the four habitats. Natural forests had the highest diversity of bird species, followed by rubber agroforests, emplacement areas and rubber plantations, with a Shannon-Wiener index of 3.8, 3.6, 3.0 and 2.9, respectively. Regarding the IUCN red list species, 12 bird species of near- threatened status and 2 species of vulnerable status were recorded. Based on CITES categories, one species was listed in the Appendix I, 12 species were classified in Appendix II and 26 bird species were protected under Indonesian regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species Biological Assessment Technical Memorandum for the All Aboard Florida Passenger Rail Project West Palm Beach to Miami, Florida August 1, 2012
    Endangered Species Biological Assessment Technical Memorandum for the All Aboard Florida Passenger Rail Project West Palm Beach to Miami, Florida August 1, 2012 ENDANGERED SPECIES BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL MEMORADUM FOR THE ALL ABOARD FLORIDA PASSENGER RAIL PROJECT WEST PALM BEACH TO MIAMI, FLORIDA Prepared Pursuant to Section 7 (c) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended by the Federal Railroad Administration and All Aboard Florida The following persons may be contacted for information on the Environmental Assessment: Catherine Dobbs Federal Railroad Administration 1200 New Jersey Ave, SE Washington, DC 20590 202.493.6347 Margarita Martinez Miguez All Aboard Florida 2855 Le Jeune Road, 4th Floor Coral Gables, Florida 33134 305.520.2458 Endangered Species Biological Assessment Technical Memorandum for the All Aboard Florida Passenger Rail Project West Palm Beach to Miami, Florida August 1, 2012 Table of Contents Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT .......................................................................................................... 3 2.1 No-Build Alternative ........................................................................................................... 3 2.2 System Build Alternative ..................................................................................................... 4 2.3 Station Alternatives ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change and Migratory Species Migratory Species
    BTO Research Report 414 BTO Research Report 414 Climate Change and Climate Change and Migratory Species Migratory Species Authors Authors Robert A. Robinson1, Jennifer A. Learmonth2, Anthony M. Hutson3, Robert A. Robinson1, Jennifer A. Learmonth2, Anthony M. Hutson3, Colin D. Macleod2, Tim H. Sparks4, David I. Leech1, Colin D. Macleod2, Tim H. Sparks4, David I. Leech1, Graham J. Pierce2, Mark M. Rehfisch1 & Humphrey Q.P. Crick1 Graham J. Pierce2, Mark M. Rehfisch1 & Humphrey Q.P. Crick1 A Report for Defra Research Contract CR0302 A Report for Defra Research Contract CR0302 August 2005 August 2005 1 British Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, IP24 2PU 1 British Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, IP24 2PU 2 Department of Zoology, University of Aberdeen, Tillydrone Avenue, Aberdeen, AB24 2TZ 2 Department of Zoology, University of Aberdeen, Tillydrone Avenue, Aberdeen, AB24 2TZ 3 IUCN - SSC Chiroptera Specialist Group 3 IUCN - SSC Chiroptera Specialist Group 4 Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Monks Wood, Abbots Ripton, Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, 4 Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Monks Wood, Abbots Ripton, Huntingdon, Cambridgeshire, PE28 2LS PE28 2LS British Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk, IP24 2PU British Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk, IP24 2PU Registered Charity No. 216652 Registered Charity No. 216652 CONTENTS CONTENTS Page No. Page No. List of Tables, Figures and Appendices .....................................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Policy and Strategy Note
    Europe and Central Asia Region FOREST POLICY AND STRATEGY NOTE June 2001 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS CEO Corporate Executive Officer ECA Europe & Central Asia ESW Economic Sector Work EU European Union FAO Food and Agriculture Organization FFS Federal Forest Service FSU Former Soviet Union GDP Gross Domestic Product GEF Global Environment Facility GNP Gross National Product GSP Gross Social Product IBRD International Bank for Reconstruction and Development IDA International Development Association IFC International Finance Corporation MEPNR Ministry of Environmental Protection and Natural Resources MIGA Multilateral Investment Guarantee Agency NEAP National Environment Action Plan NGO Non-Governmental Organization OECD Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development OED Operations Evaluation Department PREM Poverty Reduction and Economic Management TEV Total Economic Valuation VAT Value Added Tax WB/WWF Alliance World Bank/World Wildlife Fund Vice President Johannes F. Linn Sector Director Kevin M. Cleaver Sector Manager John A. Hayward Task Team Leader Marjory-Anne Bromhead ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Strategy Note was prepared as an input to the Bank’s Forest Policy and Strategy revision. It was discussed within the Bank, and at a workshop in Finland in April 2000, attended by a range of regional stakeholders. It was prepared by the staff of the World Bank’s Eastern Europe and Central Asia Department for Environmentally and Socially Sustainable Development including Marjory-Anne Bromhead, Phillip Brylski, John Fraser Stewart, Andrey
    [Show full text]