A Qualitative Study of Women in Modern Day Polygamous Households in the United States

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Qualitative Study of Women in Modern Day Polygamous Households in the United States 7\ M 7\ IJ 0 T'r) 7\ (rn r t m t rr LT0' 0 T C (\ LL' LL\LL 'JF 1I1L LI1I.i..) 'J1 Suzanne M. Wilson for the degree of Master of the Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies in Women Studies, and Sociology presented on: May 18, 2004. Title: A Qualitative Study of Women in Modern Day Polygamous Households in the United States Approved: Redacted for Privacy Susan Shaw This study will show that polygamy is not a religious freedom protected under the U.S. Constitution, but a power system in which men use economic, political, social and physical force to control the behavior of others. This thesis will use a feminist perspective theory to provide a theoretical outline for investigating the association of power with the emotional and economic dependency of women within the framework of a polygamist social structure. This dependent power system is not limited to women but to their children as well. ©Copyright by Suzanne N. Wilson May 18, 2004 All Rights Reserved A Qualitative Study of Women In Modern Day Polygamous Households in the United States by Suzanne M. Wilson A THESIS submitted to Oregon State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies Presented May 18, 2004 Commencement June 2005 Master of Arts in Interdisciplinary Studies thesisof Suzanne M. Wilson presented on May 18, 2004 Redacted for Privacy Major Professor, representing Women Studies Redacted for Privacy Committee Member, representing Women Studies Redacted for Privacy senting Sociology Redacted for Privacy Director of the College of Liberal Arts Women Studies Program Redacted for Privacy Dëan of/sa'uate School I understand that my thesis will become part of the permanent collection of Oregon State University libraries. My signature below authorizes release of my thesis to any reader upon request Redacted for Privacy Suzanne M. Wilson, Author TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER1 ..........................................1 Polygamy and Its Beginnings ......................2 CHAPTER 2 .........................................20 LiteratureReview ...............................20 CHAPTER 3 .........................................28 Methods .........................................28 CHAPTER 4 .........................................31 Findings........................................ 31 Neglect........................................ 34 First Wives and Favored Wives .................42 TheFarm .......................................56 Lies, Deceit, Coercion ........................57 Incest........................................ 64 Dynastic Unions ...............................66 ContemporaryPolygamy .........................70 Brainwashing ..................................78 CHAPTER 5 .........................................87 Conclusion ......................................87 BIBLIOGRAPHY ......................................90 DEFINITIONS .......................................98 Dedication My sincere appreciation toall the women who helped me reach my goals. Special thanksto Julie Ehrich forletting me work around myschool schedule, Susan Shawfor her guidance, Margaret Erickson for"comma" patrol, and my beloved dog Hershey for all thetimes I didn't have time to play because I had to work onthis paper and for dragging him all over the country whileI did my field research. POLYGAMY A}ID ABUSE: A QUALITATIVESTUDY OF WOMEN WITHIN MODERN DAY POLYGAMOUS HOUSEHOLDSIN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CHAPTER 2. Introduction Improving living conditions for womenand children requires that law enforcement, courts andoutsiders know how to intervene on behalf of women andchildren. This is especially true when they arepowerless to help themselves due to ignorance or a lack ofeducation, money or freedom. Because polygamous clans are sosecretive and little is known about growing up in them, theinvestigator examined the experiences of women who escaped frompolygamous communities and diaries of women who did not. Findings highlighted in this paper examine thesignificance of polygamy in fashioning American women'sexperiences of abuse and describe the way that polygamyand abuse can sometimes be interlocked experiences. Polygamy and Its Beginnings Unequal power within families often translatesinto violence that can include any member of thehousehold such as children, siblings, elderlyparents and women (Jewkes, 2002). Family power, or the lack of it for women, is a significant problem, deeplyembedded within the cultural history of the United States, acarryover from Englishlaw in which a married woman'slegal identity became thatof her husband and rendered hercivilly dead. She had no legal rights in regard to property oreven her own body. She could not own property, sue orbe sued in court. She was, in fact, hisproperty to do with as hewished. This is not In the same sense as aslave who was considered property; but it was not againstthe law for a husband to beat his wife as long as he didn't use astick thicker than his thumb (Cott, 1977). Women had fewer rights and were subordinate partners in marriage, ofwhich the husband was the legal political, economic andreligious "head." In the middle of the nineteenth century,these notions were replaced by a theoryof separate spheres for men and women. In these separate spheres, thehusband was the breadwinner and the one who entered the publicdomain, while the wife remained in the privatesphere of domestic labor (Cott, 1977). While the notion of separatespheres was an improvement overthe spousal unities doctrine because it gave women a role ofimportance of their own, the theory still preserved and promotedthe dominance of males over females in the United States(Flexner, 1975). Men were subject to the law of theland but women were 3 subject to men in theprivacy of the home. It hasbeen argued that afterindustrialization, women hadfewer rights and freedoms becausethey no longer had a roleof importance of their own (Cott,1977). They lost many ofthe roles they used to performwithin the family andcommunity as the market took overmost of theirproductive labor and their roles became morenarrowly prescribed asmothers and housewives. However, the point remainsthat women continued to be legallysubordinate to men. Laws have changed so that women areno longer legally subordinate to men. However, within polygamy, womenand children are still consideredsubordinate to men and this promotes dominance of males overfemales as described by Victoria Prunty in a newspaperarticle (Deseret New, 1998), in which she claims polygamyis a heavily patriarchal society in which a woman existsonly to serve: It's not a co-equal relationship. The husband not only has the complete say-soin the home, but he also has other women he can goto to support his decisions. And all the people underhim are looking at him as their lord, ortheir king. This is a cult. It's not about any kind ofconsensual sex or preferencebetween adults. And then the children grow up believing this ismandatory in order for them to get to heaven(Deseret News, 1998) When I began this project I did sowith much trepidation. I did not have a greatknowledge of polygamy. 4 My fear of getting into asubject I could not fathom intellectually daunted me throughoutthis project. The practices protected under theumbrella of religion can be difficult for an outsider tounderstand. The topic of polygamy is no exception. I was raised in a Christian culture and taught that a husbandhas one wife and a wife has one husband. I could not understand how a womancould share her husband with another woman, orraise her children to do so and the thoughtof sharing a husband withseveral women was beyond myunderstanding. I wanted to know howand why this was an accepted practicewithin fundamentalist Mormon sects in the United Statesof America. Even though the practice isillegal under the laws of the United States, the practice ofpolygamy continues within the borders of this country andpolygamists have little fear of being prosecuted for thecrime. The questions then become those of whythis is so and what are the dynamics that surround this apractice? I understood the concept of freedom of religionunder which polygamy is practiced, but then I read an articlein an Oregon newspaper about a 16year-old girl with obvious signs of a beating. She had escaped from an isolatedbuffalo and ostrich ranch located near the Idahoborder where authorities say a Utah polygamist secthas an established ill re-education camp for non-compliantwomen and children. She found her way to a payphone where she called 911. She had run away because she hadbeen forced to marry withher father's older brother as his15th wife (Kenworthy, 1998). The article brought up morequestions for me. Where was the girl'sright to not only freedom ofreligion but to any freedom at all?Did this girl fall into atime warp where children and women stillhad no voice in their own lives, no property rights, no sayin whom they marry, no defense against being forced into asexual relationship against their will? In women'shistory, women's voices have been silenced, not by the womenthemselves but by the political narratives surrounding women'sexperiences. Who was going to tell theworld about this girl's experience? Certainly not the men who had control overher life! That history is written from theperspective of those who hold power is problematic for womenbecause history has been written by men's perspectiveand excluded women. The invisibility of women to historians was nooversight. When history is conceived as a narrative ofpublic
Recommended publications
  • Historical Dictionary of Sufism
    04-655 (1) FM.qxd 4/18/05 12:39 PM Page i HISTORICAL DICTIONARIES OF RELIGIONS, PHILOSOPHIES, AND MOVEMENTS Jon Woronoff, Series Editor 1. Buddhism, by Charles S. Prebish, 1993 2. Mormonism, by Davis Bitton, 1994. Out of print. See No. 32. 3. Ecumenical Christianity, by Ans Joachim van der Bent, 1994 4. Terrorism, by Sean Anderson and Stephen Sloan, 1995. Out of print. See No. 41. 5. Sikhism, by W. H. McLeod, 1995 6. Feminism, by Janet K. Boles and Diane Long Hoeveler, 1995. Out of print. See No. 52. 7. Olympic Movement, by Ian Buchanan and Bill Mallon, 1995. Out of print. See No. 39. 8. Methodism, by Charles Yrigoyen Jr. and Susan E. Warrick, 1996. Out of Print. See No. 57. 9. Orthodox Church, by Michael Prokurat, Alexander Golitzin, and Michael D. Peterson, 1996 10. Organized Labor, by James C. Docherty, 1996. Out of print. See No. 50. 11. Civil Rights Movement, by Ralph E. Luker, 1997 12. Catholicism, by William J. Collinge, 1997 13. Hinduism, by Bruce M. Sullivan, 1997 14. North American Environmentalism, by Edward R. Wells and Alan M. Schwartz, 1997 15. Welfare State, by Bent Greve, 1998 16. Socialism, by James C. Docherty, 1997 17. Bahá’í Faith, by Hugh C. Adamson and Philip Hainsworth, 1998 18. Taoism, by Julian F. Pas in cooperation with Man Kam Leung, 1998 19. Judaism, by Norman Solomon, 1998 20. Green Movement, by Elim Papadakis, 1998 21. Nietzscheanism, by Carol Diethe, 1999 22. Gay Liberation Movement, by Ronald J. Hunt, 1999 23. Islamic Fundamentalist Movements in the Arab World, Iran, and Turkey, by Ahmad S.
    [Show full text]
  • Polygyny: a Study of Religious Fundamentalism Margaret L
    Polygyny: A Study of Religious Fundamentalism Margaret L. Granath Submitted under the supervision of Professor Kathleen Collins to the University Honors Program at the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts, magna cum laude, in political science. April 24, 2021 2 Acknowledgements: I would like to give thanks: To Prof. Kathleen Collins, for her guidance throughout the writing process of this work. She took a chance on me when I was a freshman, allowing me to work with her as a research assistant for three years of college until I wrote this thesis under her supervision. I am a better writer, a better researcher, and a better thinker due to her mentorship. To my parents, Al and Teresa. They never restricted what I read as a child (which turned out to be a good thing, because I read Under the Banner of Heaven in 7th grade, which turned into the inspiration for this thesis). Thank you for fostering my curiosity, then and now. To my siblings, Ellica and Kyle, thank you for allowing me to bore you with conversations about religion at dinner. All of my love. To Scott Romano, for delivering various fast foods to me during the writing process—I owe you many. Thank you for always reminding me of my worth (and to take a break). To Morgan McElroy, for his friendship. Editing your papers was a much-needed reprieve. Thank you for being there. To the women of Gamma Phi Beta, for listening each week as I shared the struggles and successes of this writing process.
    [Show full text]
  • William Smith, Isaach Sheen, and the Melchisedek & Aaronic Herald
    William Smith, Isaach Sheen, and the Melchisedek & Aaronic Herald by Connell O'Donovan William Smith (1811-1893), the youngest brother of Mormon prophet, Joseph Smith, was formally excommunicated in absentia from the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints on October 19, 1845.1 The charges brought against him as one of the twelve apostles and Patriarch to the church, which led to his excommunication and loss of position in the church founded by his brother, included his claiming the “right to have one-twelfth part of the tithing set off to him, to be appropriated to his own individual use,” for “publishing false and slanderous statements concerning the Church” (and in particular, Brigham Young, along with the rest of the Twelve), “and for a general looseness and recklessness of character which is ill comported with the dignity of his high calling.”2 Over the next 15 years, William founded some seven schismatic LDS churches, as well as joined the Strangite LDS Church and even was surreptitiously rebaptized into the Utah LDS church in 1860.3 What led William to believe he had the right, as an apostle and Patriarch to the Church, to succeed his brother Joseph, claiming authority to preside over the Quorum of the Twelve, and indeed the whole church? The answer proves to be incredibly, voluminously complex. In the research for my forthcoming book, tentatively titled Strange Fire: William Smith, Spiritual Wifery, and the Mormon “Clerical Delinquency” Crises of the 1840s, I theorize that William may have begun setting up his own church in the eastern states (far from his brother’s oversight) as early as 1842.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mormon Culture of Community and Recruitment
    The Mormon Culture of Community and Recruitment Source:http://www.allaboutmormons.com/IMG/MormonImages/mormon-scriptures/book-of-mormon-many-languages.jpg Thesis by Tofani Grava Wheaton College, Department of Anthropology Spring, 2011 1 Table of Contents Page Chapter I: Introduction 4 Chapter II: Methodology 8 1. Research Phases 8 2. My Informants and Fieldsites 11 3. Ethical Considerations 12 4. Challenges Encountered 13 Chapter III: Literature Review 15 I. Historical Framework 15 II. Theoretical Framework 17 A. Metatheoretical Framework 17 1. Theories of religion and community 17 2. Religious rituals and rites of passage 19 3. Millenarian movements 21 4. Fundamentalism 22 5. Charisma 24 B. The logic of Faith in Christianity in 21st Century America 25 1. The function of American Churches in contemporary 25 American society 28 2. Modern Techniques of membership recruitment 29 3. Religious conversion III. Analyses of Mormonism 31 A. Processes of socialization and the Mormon subculture 31 1. A Family-oriented theology 31 2. Official Mormon religious rhetoric 32 3. The prophetic figure 34 B. Mormon Conversion 35 1. Missionary work and volunteer labor force 35 2. Mormonism as millenarian 37 IV. Online Communities: Theoretical Overview 38 A. Virtual Culture 38 1. The Interaction logic of virtual communities 38 2. The Virtual Self 40 3. The Interpenetration of public and private spheres 42 4. Virtual Communities as instruments for change 43 43 2 Page B. Religion and Technology in Modern America 46 1. A New Religious Landscape 46 2. Religious representation online 49 3. Praising Technology 51 IV. Twenty-First Century Mormonism and the Internet 54 A.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Comic Book Characters and Historical Fiction: Where Alex Beam
    Comic Book Characters and Historical Fiction: Where Alex Beam Gets Joseph Smith’s Polygamy Wrong By Brian C. Hales Alex Beam addresses Joseph Smith’s polygamy in chapter 5 of American Crucifixion. From a scholarly standpoint, the chapter suffers from multiple weaknesses including the predominant use of secondary sources, quoting of problematic evidences apparently without checking their reliability, ignoring of historical data that contradicts his position, promotion of narrow and often extreme interpretations of available documents, and going beyond the evidence in constructing conclusions. I’ve been told that later chapters in American Crucifixion are generally historically accurate. Unfortunately, Beam’s treatment of the Prophet and the practice of plural marriage is so egregious and problematic, that after reading the chapter, observers will unalterably identify Joseph Smith as an adulterer, hypocrite, and fraud. When Joseph is later killed in a firestorm at Carthage, the reader may lament the injustice, but they really do not care because Beam has firmly established that Joseph was a scoundrel who probably deserved to die anyway. To me Beam’s version of Nauvoo plurality reads like historical fiction describing comic book characters who do illogical things. Beam has classified his book as “popular non-fiction,” and affirms that non-fiction works should be accurate and truthful. Accordingly, Beam’s book and his claims about its accuracy create a paradox. One of the greater weaknesses in Chapter 5 is Beam’s tendency to repeat secondary sources. There he quotes Linda King Newell and Valeen Avery eight times; Richard Van Wagoner three times; and Richard Bushman, George D.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Polygamy on the Web: an Online Community for An
    THESIS POLYGAMY ON THE WEB: AN ONLINE COMMUNITY FOR AN UNCONVENTIONAL PRACTICE Submitted by Kristen Sweet-McFarling Department of Anthropology In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the Degree of Master of Arts Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado Summer 2014 Master’s Committee: Advisor: Lynn Kwiatkowski Cindy Griffin Barbara Hawthorne Copyright by Kristen Sweet-McFarling 2014 All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT POLYGAMY ON THE WEB: AN ONLINE COMMUNITY FOR AN UNCONVENTIONAL PRACTICE This thesis is a virtual ethnographic study of a polygamy website consisting of one chat room, several discussion boards, and polygamy related information and links. The findings of this research are based on the interactions and activities of women and men on the polygamy website. The research addressed the following questions: 1) what are individuals using the website for? 2) What are website members communicating about? 3) How are individuals using the website to search for polygamous relationships? 4) Are website members forming connections and meeting people offline through the use of the website? 5) Do members of the website perceive the Internet to be affecting the contemporary practice of polygamy in the U.S.? This research focused more on the desire to create a polygamous relationship rather than established polygamous marriages and kinship networks. This study found that since the naturalization of monogamous heterosexual marriage and the nuclear family has occurred in the U.S., due to a number of historical, social, cultural, political, and economic factors, the Internet can provide a means to denaturalize these concepts and provide a space for the expression and support of counter discourses of marriage, like polygamy.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 20 Num. 2 the FARMS Review
    Review of Books on the Book of Mormon 1989–2011 Volume 20 Number 2 Article 17 2008 Vol. 20 Num. 2 The FARMS Review FARMS Review Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/msr BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Review, FARMS (2008) "Vol. 20 Num. 2 The FARMS Review," Review of Books on the Book of Mormon 1989–2011: Vol. 20 : No. 2 , Article 17. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/msr/vol20/iss2/17 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Review of Books on the Book of Mormon 1989–2011 by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. The FARMS Review The FARMS Review Editor Daniel C. Peterson Associate Editors Louis C. Midgley George L. Mitton Production Editors Don L. Brugger Larry E. Morris Cover Design Andrew D. Livingston Layout Alison Coutts Jacob D. Rawlins The Neal A. Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholarship Executive Director M. Gerald Bradford Director, FARMS Paul Y. Hoskisson Director, METI Daniel C. Peterson Director, CPART Kristian Heal Director, Publications Alison Coutts The FARMS Review Volume 20 • Number 2 • 2008 ! The Neal A. Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholarship Brigham Young University © 2008 Neal A. Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholarship Brigham Young University All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America ISSN 1550-3194 To Our Readers The Neal A. Maxwell Institute for Religious Scholar ship encour- ages and supports re search on the Book of Mormon, the Book of Abraham, the Bible, other ancient scripture, and related subjects.
    [Show full text]
  • TEMPLE RITUAL ALTERED Mormon Leaders Delete Some of the “Most Sacred” Parts of Ceremony
    Salt Lake City Messenger UTAH LIGHTHOUSE MINISTRY Issue No. 75 PO BOX 1884, SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH 84110 July 1990 TEMPLE RITUAL ALTERED Mormon Leaders Delete Some of the “Most Sacred” Parts of Ceremony In response to Fawn M. Brodie’s book, No Man Knows My History, the noted Mormon apologist Hugh Nibley declared: Yet of all churches in the world only this one has not found it necessary to readjust any part of its doctrine in the last hundred years. How does Brodie explain the fact that the doctrine which she claims was the haphazard outgrowth of complete opportunism remains the most stable on earth? (No Ma’am That’s Not History, 1946, pp. 46-47) Although most Mormons have always placed a great deal of weight in Dr. Nibley’s arguments, recent developments within the church itself will undoubtedly cause many to wonder about his claims concerning doctrinal stability. The New York Times gave this startling report in an article which begins on the first page of the issue dated May 3, 1990: The Mormon Church has changed some of its most sacred rituals, eliminating parts of the largely secret ceremonies that President Ezra Taft Benson have been viewed as offensive to women and to members of some other faiths. “Because the temple ceremony is sacred to us, we don’t Last month the church . quietly dropped from its speak about it except in the most general terms,” said Beverly temple rituals a vow in which women pledged obedience to Campbell, the East Coast director for public communications their husbands .
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Smith's Plural Wives After the Martyrdom
    Hales: Joseph Smith’s Wives after the Martyrdom 55 Joseph Smith’s Plural Wives after the Martyrdom Brian C. Hales Go thou loved one God is with thee He will be thy stay & shield And fulfill each precious promice Which his spirit has revealed. Guardian angels will protect thee And the Spirit’s still small voice, Will from day to day direct thee, Therefore let thy heart rejoice. O my Father! thou that dwelleth In the upper courts of light; Open thou the way before her— Guide, O guide her feet aright.1 Several major studies have been published examining Joseph Smith’s polygamous wives.2 My research supports that he was sealed to thirty-five plural spouses.3 This article examines briefly their later reactions to their plural involvement with the Prophet and addresses the following questions: What percentage kept the faith he taught? How many later left the Church and the Latter-day Saints? During the passing years, did any look back and consider his Nauvoo behavior improper or inappropriate? BRI A N C. HA LES ([email protected]) is an anesthesiologist at Davis Hospital in Layton, Utah, and president of the Utah Medical Association (2012–2013). He is the co-author of The Priesthood of Modern Polygamy, an LDS Perspective (1992); and author of Modern Polygamy (2008), and Mormon Fundamentalism: The Generations after the Manifesto (2006), which received the “Best Book Award” from the John Whitmer Historical As- sociation in 2007. His three volume Joseph Smith’s Polygamy: History and Theology will be published in early 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Mormon History Vol. 20, No. 1, 1994
    Journal of Mormon History Volume 20 Issue 1 Article 1 1994 Journal of Mormon History Vol. 20, No. 1, 1994 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/mormonhistory Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation (1994) "Journal of Mormon History Vol. 20, No. 1, 1994," Journal of Mormon History: Vol. 20 : Iss. 1 , Article 1. Available at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/mormonhistory/vol20/iss1/1 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Mormon History by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal of Mormon History Vol. 20, No. 1, 1994 Table of Contents LETTERS vi ARTICLES PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS • --Positivism or Subjectivism? Some Reflections on a Mormon Historical Dilemma Marvin S. Hill, 1 TANNER LECTURE • --Mormon and Methodist: Popular Religion in the Crucible of the Free Market Nathan O. Hatch, 24 • --The Windows of Heaven Revisited: The 1899 Tithing Reformation E. Jay Bell, 45 • --Plurality, Patriarchy, and the Priestess: Zina D. H. Young's Nauvoo Marriages Martha Sonntag Bradley and Mary Brown Firmage Woodward, 84 • --Lords of Creation: Polygamy, the Abrahamic Household, and Mormon Patriarchy B. Cannon Hardy, 119 REVIEWS 153 --The Story of the Latter-day Saints by James B. Allen and Glen M. Leonard Richard E. Bennett --Hero or Traitor: A Biographical Story of Charles Wesley Wandell by Marjorie Newton Richard L. Saunders --Mormon Redress Petition: Documents of the 1833-1838 Missouri Conflict edited by Clark V. Johnson Stephen C.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Mormon History Vol. 33, No. 2, 2007
    Journal of Mormon History Volume 33 Issue 2 Article 1 2007 Journal of Mormon History Vol. 33, No. 2, 2007 Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/mormonhistory Part of the Religion Commons Recommended Citation (2007) "Journal of Mormon History Vol. 33, No. 2, 2007," Journal of Mormon History: Vol. 33 : Iss. 2 , Article 1. Available at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/mormonhistory/vol33/iss2/1 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Mormon History by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal of Mormon History Vol. 33, No. 2, 2007 Table of Contents CONTENTS ARTICLES • --The Reed Smoot Hearings: A Quest for Legitimacy Harvard S. Heath, 1 • --Senator George Sutherland: Reed Smoot’s Defender Michael Harold Paulos, 81 • --Daniel S. Tuttle: Utah’s Pioneer Episcopal Bishop Frederick Quinn, 119 • --Civilizing the Ragged Edge: Jacob Hamblin’s Wives Todd Compton, 155 • --Dr. George B. Sanderson: Nemesis of the Mormon Battalion Sherman L. Fleek, 199 REVIEWS --Peter Crawley, A Descriptive Bibliography of the Mormon Church. Volume Two: 1848–1852 Curt A. Bench, 224 --Sally Denton, Faith and Betrayal: A Pioneer Woman’s Passage in the American West Jeffery Ogden Johnson, 226 --Donald Q. Cannon, Arnold K. Garr, and Bruce A. Van Orden, eds., Regional Studies in Latter-day Saint History: The New England States Shannon P. Flynn, 234 --Wayne L. Cowdrey, Howard A. Davis, and Arthur Vanick, Who Really Wrote the Book of Mormon? The Spalding Enigma Robert D.
    [Show full text]
  • Tough Questions About Mormon Polygamy with Brian and Laura Hales
    Episode 37: Tough Questions about Mormon Polygamy with Brian and Laura Hales Special Guest Podcaster Daniel Peterson (Released May 24, 2017) Daniel Peterson: I’m Daniel Peterson of the Interpreter Foundation. I’m sitting down with Brian Hales and Laura Hales to talk about polygamy. What could be more fun than that? I just want to say a word to introduce this. This is a podcast that we are producing jointly. The Interpreter Foundation, which I represent, and Brian and Laura represent LDS Perspectives Podcast. Brian is an anesthesiologist who, he tells me, and I love this line, “Charges people to put them to sleep.” I thought, “Sometimes, that’s really the business I’m in as well as a professor at BYU.” He has become over the past I don’t know how many years certainly one of the premier authorities on the origins, and to some extent, the development of plural marriage in the LDS Church in Mormonism. Laura Hales is the editor of A Reason for Faith, which is an anthology of articles on various issues that come up, or that cause problems for people, or pose challenges to people. So, we’re going to talk about plural marriage. I guess I’m just going to start off by saying that the establishment of polygamy in the church is a topic that a lot of members, and a lot of outsiders find difficult to understand. Or maybe even worse, I think they find it too easy to understand. Certainly critics do. They know immediately what it’s about, or they think they do.
    [Show full text]