DOCSLIB.ORG

The Political Rise and Fall of the Farmer in the Gilded Age

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

AP U.S. History: Unit 6.4 Teacher’s Edition The Political Rise and Fall of the Farmer in the Gilded Age Themes of the Gilded Age: Industrialism: U.S. became the world’s most powerful economy by 1890s (exceeding combined output of Britain and Germany; railroads, steel, oil, electricity, banking Unions and reform movements sought to curb the injustices of industrialism. Urbanization: America was transformed from an agrarian nation to an urban nation between 1865 (where 50% of Americans were farmers) and 1920 (where only 25% were farmers). (2% today) Millions of "New Immigrants" came from Southern and Eastern Europe, mostly to cities to work in factories. By 1900 society had become more stratified into classes than any time before or since. The “Great West": farming, mining, & cattle frontiers Farmers increasingly lost ground in the new industrial economy and eventually organized (Populism). In 1880, 25% of those who farmed did not own their land. 90% of African Americans lived in the South; 75% were tenant farmers or sharecroppers. Politics: hard vs. soft money ('70s & '90s); tariff ('80s); corruption due to political machines, patronage & trusts (throughout late 19th c.); election of 1896 ©2014 HistorySage.com All Rights Reserved This material may not be posted on any website other than HistorySage.com HistorySage.com APUSH Lecture Notes Page 2 Unit 6.4: Political Rise and Fall of the Farmer I. The Money Issue and Tariffs A. The Panic of 1873 and subsequent depression resulted in deflation during the presidency of Ulysses S. Grant (1869-1877). 1. Western mining states and farmers sought the introduction of silver to the nation’s monetary standard in order to create inflation. 2. Conservatives feared inflation and instituted deflationary policies, such as the Bland-Allison Act (1873), that actually caused the depression of the 1870s to worsen. 3. The money issue emerged as the biggest political issue of the 1870s. a. New political parties such as the Greenback Labor Party in the 1870s and the Populist party in the 1890s were dedicated to increasing the money supply by adding massive amounts of silver to the money supply. b. The climactic election of 1896 would ultimately decide the issue as those who advocated the unlimited coinage of silver were soundly defeated. B. Sherman Silver Purchase Act of 1890 (system of bimetallism) 1. The Treasury would approximately double the minimum amount of silver purchased under the Bland-Allison Act of 1873. 2. Western pro-silver advocates agreed to support a protective tariff in return for eastern support for a silver bill. a. Mining states hated the “woefully limited” silver purchasing under the Bland-Allison Act. b. Easterners were eager to increase tariffs and increase profits but were concerned about inflation through increased silver purchases. c. Result: Not enough silver flooded the monetary system; thus, inflation did not occur significantly. C. McKinley Tariff Bill (1890) 1. Republicans’ reward for supporting the Sherman Silver Purchase Act 2. Raised tariffs to the highest peacetime level in U.S. history: 48% 3. Republicans lost the 1890 mid-term elections for Congress. a. The new Congress included 9 members of the Farmers’ Alliances. b. The tariff issue was replaced by the silver issue as the main issue in 1890s. D. Economic problems plaguing farmers 1. Farmers were in perpetual debt; many lost their farms to foreclosure. 2. Deflated currency and low food prices were the chief worries among farmers. 3. Natural disasters caused by freezing temperatures, insects, and diseases compounded the problems farmers faced. 4. Government policies seemed to hurt farmers © HistorySage.com 2014 All Rights Reserved This material may not be posted on any website other than HistorySage.com HistorySage.com APUSH Lecture Notes Page 3 Unit 6.4: Political Rise and Fall of the Farmer a. Farmers’ land was often overvalued, making property taxes higher. b. Protective tariffs hurt the South as manufactured product prices increased Farmers’ products were unprotected in the competitive world market. 5. Agricultural-related trusts gouged farmers: barbed-wire trust, fertilizer trust, harvester trust, and railroad trust (freight rates) 6. Farmers were underrepresented politically and poorly organized. II. Political Rise of the Farmer A. National Grange of the Patrons of Husbandry: The Grange organized in 1867 1. Provided farmers with social and educational activities (picnics, music, lectures) a. The initial purpose of the Grange was to help reduce the isolation many farmers felt in sparsely-populated areas. b. By 1875, the Grange had about 800,000 members, mostly in the Midwest and South. 2. Eventually, the Grange established cooperatives for both consumers and producers. a. Grain elevators (to store excess grain), dairies to store and process products, cooperative stores to purchase supplies (such as seed, plows, fertilizer, etc.) b. Politically, the Grange sought to end monopolistic railroad practices that hurt farmers with high freight rates. c. Its attempt to manufacture harvesting machinery ultimately failed. 3. Grangers were politically successful in Illinois, Wisconsin, Iowa, and Minnesota. a. Granger Laws sought gov't control over big business to benefit the people. Regulated railroad rates and storage fees charged by railroads and operators of warehouses and grain elevators. b. Munn vs. Illinois (1877): The Supreme Court ruled that private property was subject to gov't regulation when property was devoted to the public interest. c. Many Granger Laws were written badly and overturned by higher courts who were influenced by wealthy business interests. Wabash case (1886): The Court ruled that individual states don’t have right to regulate interstate commerce (effectively overturned Munn decision). Supreme Court reverses, especially the Wabash case, reduced Granger influence in state politics. © HistorySage.com 2014 All Rights Reserved This material may not be posted on any website other than HistorySage.com HistorySage.com APUSH Lecture Notes Page 4 Unit 6.4: Political Rise and Fall of the Farmer B. Greenback Labor Party 1. The third party emerged in the 1870s that combined the inflationary goals of earlier Greenback supporters with a program for improving conditions for laborers. The money issue (soft vs. hard) was perhaps the biggest political issue of the 1870s. 2. In the election of 1878, the Greenback-Labor party earned over a million votes and elected 14 members to Congress. 3. Election of 1880, the Greenback Party nominated General James B. Weaver, a Granger and Civil War veteran. a. Weaver received only 3% of the total popular vote. b. He would become the candidate of the Populist party in 1892. C. Populism -- Rise of the Populist Party 1. Farmers’ Alliances in the South (formed in 1877) and Midwest (1880) increasingly voiced discontent; the Colored Alliance formed in 1889. a. Like the Grangers, they sponsored social events, political action, cooperatives, and gov't regulation of railroads and manufacturers. b. The 3 Alliances met in 1889 and boasted over 3 million members Demanded free silver and a subtreasury plan for farmers (would provide cash advances on a farmer’s future crop) A major demand of the Southern Alliance in 1880 had been a subtreasury plan. o Reason: farmers had poor cash flow during much of the year o Called for federal subtreasury offices alongside warehouses or grain elevators. o Farmers could store grain and the subtreasury would loan them up to 80% of the value of the crop at modest interest and fees. c. Many supported or joined the Knights of Labor; saw similar goals d. Defeat of the subtreasury scheme in Congress in 1890 led to the Alliances taking political matters into their own hands and forming a third party. Since the Civil War, Greenbackers, Workingmen’s and Knights of Labor parties, and Farmers’ Alliances saw banking interests and trusts—“the Eastern Establishment”— as monopolistic culprits who exploited workers and farmers. 2. The People’s Party (Populist Party) emerged in the early 1890s through the Farmer’s Alliances; born in Topeka, Kansas a. Attracted recruits from Farmer’s Alliances and disenfranchised southern whites. b. Ignatius Donnelly was elected three times to Congress, and was a major figure in the Populist movement. © HistorySage.com 2014 All Rights Reserved This material may not be posted on any website other than HistorySage.com HistorySage.com APUSH Lecture Notes Page 5 Unit 6.4: Political Rise and Fall of the Farmer He was formerly known as a utopian author (like Henry George and Edward Bellamy) c. Mary E. Lease gave numerous speeches in 1890 denouncing the Eastern Establishment in Wall Street Kansas should raise "less corn & more hell." d. "Sockless" Jerry Simpson, along with Lease, traveled to the South to get Southern Alliance support for Populist unity. e. Tom Watson: elected to Congress in 1890, fought for the subtreasury plan, and fought for Populist unity in 1892 In 1896, he became the Democratic party’s vice presidential candidate alongside William Jennings Bryan D. Disenfranchisement and anti-black violence 1. "Pitchfork" Ben Tillman, a Democrat, used his Southern Alliance influence to become governor of South Carolina and dominate the Democratic party in that state. Tillman succeeded in disenfranchising blacks in the state constitution. 2. Widespread southern fears of blacks in Farmers’ Alliances led to a major push for disenfranchisement in the 1890s and Jim Crow laws. Following South Carolina’s lead, southern states limited black suffrage in their state constitutions. 3. Voting restrictions were essentially a ruling-class campaign against lower-class voters in general, not just African Americans. Deliberate attempt by the New South’s elite, who were threatened by the Populists, to destroy party opposition and widespread political participation. 4. In the 1890s white southern hatred toward blacks became almost genocidal; a huge increase in the number of lynchings resulted. III. Election of 1892 A. Democrats nominated Grover Cleveland (who had been president four years earlier) He was now more conservative than during his first term (1885- 1889) as his law practice represented wealthy businessmen.
Recommended publications
  • The Brute Caricature

    The Brute Caricature

    The Brute Caricature MORE PICTURES The brute caricature portrays black men as innately savage, animalistic, destructive, and criminal -- deserving punishment, maybe death. This brute is a fiend, a sociopath, an anti-social menace. Black brutes are depicted as hideous, terrifying predators who target helpless victims, especially white women. Charles H. Smith (1893), writing in the 1890s, claimed, "A bad negro is the most horrible creature upon the earth, the most brutal and merciless"(p. 181). Clifton R. Breckinridge (1900), a contemporary of Smith's, said of the black race, "when it produces a brute, he is the worst and most insatiate brute that exists in human form" (p. 174). George T. Winston (1901), another "Negrophobic" writer, claimed: When a knock is heard at the door [a White woman] shudders with nameless horror. The black brute is lurking in the dark, a monstrous beast, crazed with lust. His ferocity is almost demoniacal. A mad bull or tiger could scarcely be more brutal. A whole community is frenzied with horror, with the blind and furious rage for vengeance.(pp. 108-109) During slavery the dominant caricatures of blacks -- Mammy, Coon, Tom, and picaninny -- portrayed them as childlike, ignorant, docile, groveling, and generally harmless. These portrayals were pragmatic and instrumental. Proponents of slavery created and promoted images of blacks that justified slavery and soothed white consciences. If slaves were childlike, for example, then a paternalistic institution where masters acted as quasi-parents to their slaves was humane, even morally right. More importantly, slaves were rarely depicted as brutes because that portrayal might have become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
  • William Jennings Bryan and His Opposition to American Imperialism in the Commoner

    William Jennings Bryan and His Opposition to American Imperialism in the Commoner

    The Uncommon Commoner: William Jennings Bryan and his Opposition to American Imperialism in The Commoner by Dante Joseph Basista Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the History Program YOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIVERSITY August, 2019 The Uncommon Commoner: William Jennings Bryan and his Opposition to American Imperialism in The Commoner Dante Joseph Basista I hereby release this thesis to the public. I understand that this thesis will be made available from the OhioLINK ETD Center and the Maag Library Circulation Desk for public access. I also authorize the University or other individuals to make copies of this thesis as needed for scholarly research. Signature: Dante Basista, Student Date Approvals: Dr. David Simonelli, Thesis Advisor Date Dr. Martha Pallante, Committee Member Date Dr. Donna DeBlasio, Committee Member Date Dr. Salvatore A. Sanders, Dean of Graduate Studies Date ABSTRACT This is a study of the correspondence and published writings of three-time Democratic Presidential nominee William Jennings Bryan in relation to his role in the anti-imperialist movement that opposed the US acquisition of the Philippines, Guam and Puerto Rico following the Spanish-American War. Historians have disagreed over whether Bryan was genuine in his opposition to an American empire in the 1900 presidential election and have overlooked the period following the election in which Bryan’s editorials opposing imperialism were a major part of his weekly newspaper, The Commoner. The argument is made that Bryan was authentic in his opposition to imperialism in the 1900 presidential election, as proven by his attention to the issue in the two years following his election loss.
  • Third Parties, Elections,And Roll-Call Votes: the Populist Party and the Late Nineteenth-Century U.S

    Third Parties, Elections,And Roll-Call Votes: the Populist Party and the Late Nineteenth-Century U.S

    Third Parties, Elections, and Roll-Call Votes 131 SHIGEO HIRANO Columbia University Third Parties, Elections,and Roll-Call Votes: The Populist Party and the Late Nineteenth-Century U.S. Congress What effect do electorally successful third parties have on congressional roll- call votes? There is widespread belief among scholars that third parties influence the policies of the major parties, but there is little systematic evidence of this influence. I exploit the unique historical context surrounding the Populist Party formation in 1892 to examine the effect of the Populist Party’s electoral success on congressional roll-call votes related to Populist issues. The results are consistent with two claims. First, co-optation of the Populist Party’s issues occurred even before the formation of the party. Second, the co-optation of Populist policies does not appear to be corre- lated with the electoral success of the Populist candidates. The appearance of new political parties is a common phenom- enon in all democracies. The conventional wisdom is that these new political parties enter when the established parties are unresponsive to the interests of particular segments of the electorate (Hug 1996; Inglehart 1977, 1990; Kitschelt 1989, 1994; Mazmanian 1974; Rohrschneider 1993; Rosenstone, Behr, and Lazarus 1984; Sundquist 1983). The new political parties gather electoral support by offering policies to meet the demands of the electorate unsatisfied with the policy alternatives offered by the established parties. Thus, the new political parties can potentially help ensure that the policies of candi- dates do not stray too far from the preferences of the electorate. Even in the United States, which has a stable two-party system, new political parties are argued to affect representation.
  • December 8, 2016 President Daniel F. Mahony Winthrop University

    December 8, 2016 President Daniel F. Mahony Winthrop University

    December 8, 2016 President Daniel F. Mahony Winthrop University Office of the President 114 Tillman Hall Rock Hill, South Carolina 29733 URGENT Sent via U.S. Mail and Electronic Mail ([email protected]) Dear President Mahony: The Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization dedicated to defending liberty, freedom of speech, due process, academic freedom, legal equality, and freedom of conscience on America’s college campuses. The National Coalition Against Censorship (NCAC), founded in 1974, is an alliance of over 50 national nonprofit organizations, including literary, artistic, religious, educational, professional, labor, and civil liberties groups dedicated to promoting the right to free speech. FIRE and NCAC are concerned for the state of freedom of expression at Winthrop University due to the spurious charges and threats of expulsion or suspension levied against student Samantha Valdez over her alleged involvement in an art installation criticizing Winthrop’s naming of Tillman Hall. The following is our understanding of the facts; please inform us if you believe we are in error. On the night of November 12 or the morning of November 13, 2016, figures—made of nylon stockings stuffed with dirt, spray-painted black, and shaped like bodies—were placed in the trees outside Winthrop’s Tillman Hall, and a piece of paper that said “Tillman’s Legacy” was taped over the sign outside the hall.1 Tillman Hall has, for months, been at the center of 1 For a photograph of the installation, see Caroline Fountain (@FountainFox46) TWITTER (Nov. 14, 2016 1:23 PM), https://twitter.com/FountainFox46/status/798229762246406144?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw.
  • The Birth of the Populist Party

    The Birth of the Populist Party

    THE BIRTH OF THE POPULIST PARTY Those who have tried within recent years to found a new political party in the United States will be quick to agree that the task is not a light one. It is not merely that the inertia of the American voter is great and his adherence to party tradi­ tion firm; there are yet other obstacles to be overcome. The mere business of getting convinced reformers together in suffi'- cient numbers to justify formal organization; the problem of inducing men who are notably contentious to agree upon any common platform or plan of action; the creation of a party machine by which candidates may be named, campaigns con­ ducted, and elections carried —- these things constitute some of the initial difficulties that the would-be reformers must con­ front. Of all the third parties that have made their appearance in American politics the Populist party of the nineties, which voiced the protest of multitudes in the agricultural South and West against the rising power of an eastern " plutocracy," is perhaps the most outstanding. It did not, to be sure, win many victories as a party; rather, it forced the existing parties to take cognizance of issues they had previously tended to dodge or to ignore. Nor did it long endure. But the Populist party was more than a mere portent. Those early disasters that ordinarily make abortive the best efforts of reformers to found a party, it was fortunate enough to escape; and it lived long enough to achieve an organization and a personality as definite and distinct as either of the older parties ever pos­ sessed.
  • CHAIRMEN of SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–Present

    CHAIRMEN of SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–Present

    CHAIRMEN OF SENATE STANDING COMMITTEES [Table 5-3] 1789–present INTRODUCTION The following is a list of chairmen of all standing Senate committees, as well as the chairmen of select and joint committees that were precursors to Senate committees. (Other special and select committees of the twentieth century appear in Table 5-4.) Current standing committees are highlighted in yellow. The names of chairmen were taken from the Congressional Directory from 1816–1991. Four standing committees were founded before 1816. They were the Joint Committee on ENROLLED BILLS (established 1789), the joint Committee on the LIBRARY (established 1806), the Committee to AUDIT AND CONTROL THE CONTINGENT EXPENSES OF THE SENATE (established 1807), and the Committee on ENGROSSED BILLS (established 1810). The names of the chairmen of these committees for the years before 1816 were taken from the Annals of Congress. This list also enumerates the dates of establishment and termination of each committee. These dates were taken from Walter Stubbs, Congressional Committees, 1789–1982: A Checklist (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 1985). There were eleven committees for which the dates of existence listed in Congressional Committees, 1789–1982 did not match the dates the committees were listed in the Congressional Directory. The committees are: ENGROSSED BILLS, ENROLLED BILLS, EXAMINE THE SEVERAL BRANCHES OF THE CIVIL SERVICE, Joint Committee on the LIBRARY OF CONGRESS, LIBRARY, PENSIONS, PUBLIC BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS, RETRENCHMENT, REVOLUTIONARY CLAIMS, ROADS AND CANALS, and the Select Committee to Revise the RULES of the Senate. For these committees, the dates are listed according to Congressional Committees, 1789– 1982, with a note next to the dates detailing the discrepancy.
  • Totalitarian Dynamics, Colonial History, and Modernity: the US South After the Civil War

    Totalitarian Dynamics, Colonial History, and Modernity: the US South After the Civil War

    ADVERTIMENT. Lʼaccés als continguts dʼaquesta tesi doctoral i la seva utilització ha de respectar els drets de la persona autora. Pot ser utilitzada per a consulta o estudi personal, així com en activitats o materials dʼinvestigació i docència en els termes establerts a lʼart. 32 del Text Refós de la Llei de Propietat Intel·lectual (RDL 1/1996). Per altres utilitzacions es requereix lʼautorització prèvia i expressa de la persona autora. En qualsevol cas, en la utilització dels seus continguts caldrà indicar de forma clara el nom i cognoms de la persona autora i el títol de la tesi doctoral. No sʼautoritza la seva reproducció o altres formes dʼexplotació efectuades amb finalitats de lucre ni la seva comunicació pública des dʼun lloc aliè al servei TDX. Tampoc sʼautoritza la presentació del seu contingut en una finestra o marc aliè a TDX (framing). Aquesta reserva de drets afecta tant als continguts de la tesi com als seus resums i índexs. ADVERTENCIA. El acceso a los contenidos de esta tesis doctoral y su utilización debe respetar los derechos de la persona autora. Puede ser utilizada para consulta o estudio personal, así como en actividades o materiales de investigación y docencia en los términos establecidos en el art. 32 del Texto Refundido de la Ley de Propiedad Intelectual (RDL 1/1996). Para otros usos se requiere la autorización previa y expresa de la persona autora. En cualquier caso, en la utilización de sus contenidos se deberá indicar de forma clara el nombre y apellidos de la persona autora y el título de la tesis doctoral.
  • The Vulcan Historical Review Daniel Fowler, William Watt, Deborah Hayes, Rebecca Dobrinski, Kaye Cochran Nail, John Wiley, George O

    The Vulcan Historical Review Daniel Fowler, William Watt, Deborah Hayes, Rebecca Dobrinski, Kaye Cochran Nail, John Wiley, George O

    Donna L. Cox, Colin J. Davis, David M. Brewer, Robert Maddox, Sameera Hasan, Jerry Snead, Stacy S. Simon, Eric Knudsen, Patricia A. Donna L. Cox, Colin J. Davis, David M. Brewer, Robert Maddox, Sameera Hasan, Jerry Snead, Stacy S. Simon, Eric Knudsen, Patricia A. Matthews, Scott M. Speagle, Will C. Holmes, J. D. Jackson, Aimee Armstrong Belden, Carol Balmer, Alan Dismukes, Jack E. Davis, Kenneth Matthews, Scott M. Speagle, Will C. Holmes, J. D. Jackson, Aimee Armstrong Belden, Carol Balmer, Alan Dismukes, Jack E. Davis, Ken- Homsley, Kurt E. Kinbacher, Jonathan L. Foster, Howard J. Fox III, Jeremy P. Soileau, Catherine L. Druhan, Andrew T. Baird, Averil Charles neth Homsley, Kurt E. Kinbacher, Jonathanth L. Foster, Howard J. Fox III, Jeremy P. Soileau, Catherine L. Druhan, Andrew T. Baird, Averil Ramsey, Mary B. Ashley, J. Kyle Irvin, Ellen M. Griffin, Tiffany Bence, Michelle L. Devins, Kelly Hamilton, Rhonda K. Mitchell, Roger K. Charles Ramsey, Mary B. Ashley,20 J. Kyle Irvin,ANNIVERSARY Ellen M. Griffin, Tiffany Bence, Michelle L.ISSUE Devins, Kelly Hamilton, Rhonda K. Mitchell, Steele, Lindsay Stainton-James, Sanford E. Jeames, Timothy L. Pennycuff, Donnelly F. Lancaster, Melinda Holm, Ron Bates, Jessica Lacher Roger K. Steele, Lindsay Stainton-James, Sanford E. Jeames, Timothy L. Pennycuff, Donnelly F. Lancaster, Melinda Holm, Ron Bates, Jes- Feldman, Horace Huntley, Cynthia A. Luckie, Elizabeth Wells, Becky Strickland, Wayne Coleman, Ashley C. Grantham, Allie A. Hanna, sica Lacher Feldman, Horace Huntley, Cynthia A. Luckie, Elizabeth Wells, Becky Strickland, Wayne Coleman, Ashley C. Grantham, Allie Robert W. Heinrich, Christopher M. Long, Jerry Tiarsmith, Jennifer Marie Wilson, Pamela E.
  • Zionist' Threat to Liberty and Constitutional Government

    Zionist' Threat to Liberty and Constitutional Government

    East Texas Historical Journal Volume 40 Issue 1 Article 6 3-2002 The Last Populist- George Washington Armstrong and the Texas Gubernatorial Election of 1932, and the 'Zionist' Threat to Liberty and Constitutional Government Kenneth E. Hendrickson Jr Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ethj Part of the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Recommended Citation Hendrickson, Kenneth E. Jr (2002) "The Last Populist- George Washington Armstrong and the Texas Gubernatorial Election of 1932, and the 'Zionist' Threat to Liberty and Constitutional Government," East Texas Historical Journal: Vol. 40 : Iss. 1 , Article 6. Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ethj/vol40/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in East Texas Historical Journal by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EAST TEXAS HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION 3 THE LAST POPULIST - GEORGE WASHINGTON ARMSTRONG AND THE TEXAS GUBERNATORIAL ELECTION OF 1932, AND THE 'ZIONIST' THREAT TO LIBERTY AND CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT by Kenneth E. Hendrickson, ir. On November 11, 1932, Miriam Amanda "Ma" Ferguson, one of the half dozen most incompetent people ever to bold the position, was elected to her second term as governor of Texas. Her nearest rival was Republican Orville Bullington, a reactionary lawyer from Wichita Falls. Surprisingly, in view of the financial woes of the time, Bullington made a strong showing because many Democrats, disgusted by the questionable outcome of the primaries which had brought defeat to Governor Ross Sterling, and appalled by the return of "Ma" and her controller husband James B.
  • US History II (OS Collection)

    US History II (OS Collection)

    US History II (OS Collection) US History II (OS Collection) Lumen Learning Curated by Lumen Learning, drawing primarily on the following resources: © May 15, 2015 OpenStax College. Textbook content produced by OpenStax College is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 license. Download for free at http://cnx.org/contents/[email protected]. Cover Image: “Crowd outside nyse” from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Crowd_outside_nyse.jpg#/media/ File:Crowd_outside_nyse.jpg used under public domain. CONTENTS Instructor Resources (Materials Available with Log In) ...............................................................1 The Era of Reconstruction, 1865-1877 .......................................................................................2 • Introduction........................................................................................................................................................ 2 • Restoring the Union ........................................................................................................................................... 3 • Congress and the Remaking of the South, 1865–1866..................................................................................... 8 • Radical Reconstruction, 1867–1872................................................................................................................ 12 • The Collapse of Reconstruction......................................................................................................................
  • Populism Political Cartoons Populists' Major Complaint Was That Politicians and Wall Street Held the "People" Down by Manipulating the Political System

    Populism Political Cartoons Populists' Major Complaint Was That Politicians and Wall Street Held the "People" Down by Manipulating the Political System

    Populism Political Cartoons Populists' major complaint was that politicians and Wall Street held the "people" down by manipulating the political system. This problem could be solved by a "rising of the people" that would restore popular control of government. Farmers and laborers (especially miners) proved to be the Populist Party's strongest supporters. In this cartoon, the fruits of their labor are being stolen by financial interests through foreclosures, interest, rents, etc. Populists defended the original meaning of America -- a place where relatively equal small producers dominated. Monarchy, aristocracy, and other forms of privilege constituted a negative counter-image to American republicanism in Populist eyes The caption at the bottom of this cartoon reads: George Washington (Farewell Address) -- "We should look to the future for a power not of the people (plutocracy) may seek to destroy this free government. Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty." Thomas Jefferson (Democrat 1801) -- "All men being created free and equal, it is therefore a fundamental principle of this government to guarantee equal rights to all and special privileges to none." Abraham Lincoln (Republican 1860) -- "A government by the people, for the people and of the people shall not perish from the earth." Plutocracy (1896) -- "Them fellows were foolish to believe that they could keep me off this throne." Populists opposed the rising gap between rich and poor that developed during late nineteenth century America. Talent and hard work alone could not explain the differences. Thus, Populists suspected that the rich had gotten ahead through illegitimate special privileges. Populists feared that concentration of wealth would destroy the economic independence that Americans needed to be political free agents.
  • 8Th Grade Social Studies Assignments April 2 - 30

    8Th Grade Social Studies Assignments April 2 - 30

    8th Grade Social Studies Assignments April 2 - 30 APRIL 1-10 Pacing Guide (8-5.4, 8-5.5, 8-5.6) R e a d i n g & Q ’ s April 2 Complete 8-5.4 Questions 1 - 15 (15 Q's) April 3-4 Complete 8-5.4 Questions 16 - 30 (15 Q's) April 5-6 Complete 8-5.5 Questions 1 - 19 (19 Q's) April 7-8 Complete 8-5.6 Questions 1 - 13 (13 Q's) April 9-10 Complete 8-5.6 Questions 14 - 25 (12 Q's) APRIL 20-30 Pacing Guide (Choose 3 Tasks) April 20-23 Complete One (Journal It, Timeline, ABC Book, Civil War VIPs, Civil War Women in Action) April 24-27 Complete a Different Task (Journal It, Timeline, ABC Book, Civil War VIPs, Civil War Women in Action) April 28-30 Complete a Different Task (Journal It, Timeline, ABC Book, Civil War VIPs, Civil War Women in Action) • When you are finished with 1 or all of your assignments, take a clear picture and email them to your SS teacher. Make sure they are labeled with assignment name and your name. • Remember, you do not need to print out the assignments; you can place all answers on your own piece of notebook paper labeled with the assignment name and your name. [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] April 2-10 Reading & Q’s Assignments 8th Grade SS State Standards Focus: 8-5.4; 8-5.5; 8-5.6 Packet Contents: - 8-5.4 Support Document: “Systems - Policies - Actions” - 8-5.4 Review Questions - 8-5.5 Support Document: “Industrialization” - 8-5.5 Review Questions - 8-5.6 Support Document: “Plight of Farmers” - 8-5.6 Review Questions Directions: For each Curriculum Standard Read Article and Complete the corresponding Review Questions.