BOARD LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE Friday, July 19, 2019 12:30 P.M
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
BOARD LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE Friday, July 19, 2019 12:30 p.m. EBRPD – Administrative Headquarters 2950 Peralta Oaks Court Oakland, California 94605 The following agenda items are listed for Committee consideration. In accordance with the Board Operating Guidelines, no official action of the Board will be taken at this meeting; rather, the Committee’s purpose shall be to review the listed items and to consider developing recommendations to the Board of Directors. A copy of the background materials concerning these agenda items, including any material that may have been submitted less than 72 hours before the meeting, is available for inspection on the District’s website (www. ebparks.org), the Headquarters reception desk, and at the meeting. Public Comment on Agenda Items If you wish to testify on an item on the agenda, please complete a speaker’s form and submit it to the recording secretary. Your name will be called when the item is announced for discussion. Accommodations and Access District facilities and meetings comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. If special accommodations are needed for you to participate, please contact the Clerk of the Board at 510-544-2020 as soon as possible, but preferably at least three working days prior to the meeting. AGENDA TIME ITEM STATUS STAFF 12:30 I. STATE LEGISLATION / OTHER MATTERS A. NEW LEGISLATION R Doyle/Pfuehler 1. AB 38 (Wood D-Santa Rosa) - Fire Hardened Homes Revolving Loan and Rebate Fund 2. AB 1668 (Carrillo D-Los Angeles) – California Conservation Corps Education and Employment Reentry Program 3. SB 226 (Nielsen R-Gerber) - Watershed Restoration Grant Program 4. SB 268 (Wiener D-San Francisco) – Ballot Measure Tax Rate Information 5. SB 462 (Stern D-Canoga Park) – Community College Forest and Woodlands Restoration Workforce Curriculum 6. Other Matters B. OTHER STATE MATTERS R Doyle/Pfuehler 1. Wildfire Prevention, Safe Drinking Water, Drought Preparation, and Flood Protection Bond Act of 2020 2. AB 1190 (Irwin D-Thousand Oaks) – Prohibition of Local Drone Bans Update 3. AB 1486 (Ting D-San Francisco) – Surplus Land for Housing Update 4. Other Matters II. FEDERAL LEGISLATION / OTHER MATTERS R Doyle/Pfuehler A. NEW LEGISLATION 1. H.Con.Res. 49 (DeSaulnier D-CA) – Port Chicago 50 Exoneration 2. H.Res. 371 (Thompson D-CA) – Recognizing the 10th Anniversary of Outdoor Afro 3. H.R. 2358 (Kaptur D-OH) – 21st Century Civilian Conservation Corps 4. H.R. 3195 (Van Drew D-NJ) – Land and Water Conservation Fund Permanent Funding Act 5. S. 1098 (Cardin D-MD) – Transportation Alternatives Enhancements Act 6. S. 1263 (Cortez Masto D-NV) and H.R. 2435 (Smith R-NJ) – Accelerating Veterans Recovery Outdoors Act 7. S. 1746 (Schatz D-HI) – Explore America Act 8. Other Matters B. OTHER FEDERAL MATTERS I Doyle/Pfuehler 1. S. 500 and H.R. 1225 (Portman R-OH and Bishop R-UT) Restore our Parks Act Update 2. Land and Water Conservation Fund Update 3. Other Matters III. PARK AND PUBLIC INTEREST COMMUNITY I Pfuehler/Baldinger ENGAGEMENT PROJECT REPORT IV. ARTICLES V. OPEN FORUM PUBLIC COMMENT Individuals wishing to address the Committee on a topic not on the agenda may do so by completing a speaker’s form and submitting it to the recording secretary. VI. BOARD COMMENTS (R) Recommendation for Future Board Consideration Future Meetings: (I) Information January 18 July 19 (D) Discussion February – NO MTG August 16 March 15 September – NO MTG Legislative Committee Members April 19 October 18 Dennis Waespi (Chair); Ellen Corbett, Colin Coffey May 17 November – NO MTG Director Dee Rosario, Alternate June – NO MTG *December 13 Erich Pfuehler, Government Affairs Manager TO: Board Legislative Committee (Chair Dennis Waespi, Colin Coffey, Ellen Corbett, alt. Dee Rosario) FROM: Robert E. Doyle, General Manager Erich Pfuehler, Government Affairs Manager SUBJECT: Board Legislative Committee Meeting WHEN: Friday, July 19, 2019 12:30 PM Lunch will be served WHERE: Board Room, Peralta Oaks _______ Items to be discussed: I. STATE LEGISLATION / OTHER MATTERS A. NEW LEGISLATION 1. AB 38 (Wood D – Santa Rosa) – Fire Hardened Homes Revolving Loan and Rebate Fund This bill establishes the Fire Hardened Homes Revolving Loan and Rebate Fund (Fund) to provide financial assistance and rebates to building owners to help pay for costs associated with fire hardening. It also requires building owners to notify potential buyers about fire hardening improvements on the property. The Fund would be administered by the California Statewide Communities Development Authority. It also requires the Natural Resources Agency to review the regional capacity of each county that contains a very high fire hazard severity zone. The bill is supported by the California Fire Chiefs Association, California League of Conservation Voters, Sierra Club, The Nature Conservancy and a number of insurance groups. The Realtors oppose. Staff recommendation: Support. 2. AB 1668 (Carrillo D – Los Angeles) – California Conservation Corps Education and Employment Reentry Program Assembly Member Carrillo’s legislation would require the Director of the California Conservation Corps to prioritize adding formerly incarcerated inmates to their crews. The Corps crews generally are between the ages of 18 and 25. The average age of a released inmate is 38. Integrating the two age groups could be a challenge. Staff recommendation: Watch. 3. SB 226 (Nielsen R – Gerber) – Watershed Restoration Grant Program Senator Nielsen’s legislation requires the California Natural Resources Agency to develop and implement the Watershed Restoration Grant Program. It would provide grants for watershed restoration to improve water quality and/or water supply following a wildfire. This dedicated funding source defines a watershed to mean any river, watershed or river system tributary that has been affected by a wildfire. Funds are only available for areas where a wildfire occurred on or after January 1, 2017 and a state of emergency was declared by the Governor. The bill authorizes the grant program for five years, so potentially could apply to future fire 1 emergencies. The bill is supported by the California State Association of Counties, Association of California Water Agencies and Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District. Staff recommendation: Support. 4. SB 268 (Wiener D – San Francisco) – Ballot Measure Tax Rate Information Currently, if a ballot measure imposes or raises a tax, the tax rate needs to be identified in the ballot statement. Senator Wiener’s legislation would exempt a measure that imposes or increases a tax with more than one rate or authorizes the issuance of bonds. In its stead, it requires the statement include “see voter guide for information.” The tax rate can be identified in the voter guide. The bill is supported by the California Special Districts Association, California State Association of Counties and the State Building and Construction Trades Council. It is opposed by the California Taxpayers Association. Staff recommendation: Support. 5. SB 462 (Stern D – Canoga Park) – Community College Forest and Woodlands Restoration Workforce Curriculum Senator Stern’s bill calls on the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges, to develop a forest and woodlands restoration workforce curriculum and vocational programs to be offered by community college districts commencing on or before July 31, 2021. According to the Senate Appropriations Committee, this bill, based on the cost of similar programs funded in recent years, could require $10 million in start-up funding. The model curriculum that would be created by this bill differs from existing fire science degree programs by focusing on restoration. Currently, there is no complete, explicit restoration workforce training program available in California. The bill is supported by the California Native Plant Society, Sierra Business Council and The Nature Conservancy. Staff recommendation: Support. 6. Other Matters B. OTHER STATE MATTERS 1. Wildfire Prevention, Safe Drinking Water, Drought Preparation and Flood Protection Bond Act of 2020 This is the $7.883 billion bond measure filed by Joe Caves. It allocates funding to the following: • $3.508 billion for wildfire prevention and community resilience from climate impacts. • $2.2 billion for safe drinking water, protecting water supply and water quality from climate risks. • $975 million for protecting fish and wildlife from climate risks. • $770 million for protecting coastal lands, bays and oceans from climate risks. • $230 million for climate resilience, workforce development and education, • $200 million for protecting agricultural land from climate risks. Given the high price tag for the bond itself and the expense of qualifying the measure for the ballot (estimated in the neighborhood of $4 million), it is unclear how serious an effort this is. 2 2. AB 1190 (Irwin D – Thousand Oaks) – Prohibition of Local Drone Bans Update District staff and advocates have been working to amend this legislation to exempt Public Resources Code 5500 and 35100 (Santa Clara Open Space Authority), which would enable such open space agencies to ban the use of drones. It is a two-year bill, but District staff would like to have the Legislative Committee’s authority to oppose the bill if it is not amended. 3. AB 1486 (Ting D – San Francisco) – Surplus Land for Housing Update District staff remain concerned about the impacts of this legislation. It requires any local agency, when disposing of surplus land, to first offer it for sale or lease for the purpose of developing low- and moderate-income housing. It also requires each local agency, on or before December 31 of each year, to make an inventory of all lands it holds, owns or controls, including a description of each parcel found to be in excess of its needs. The California Special Districts Association is in strong opposition of this legislation. They assert this bill imposes onerous new requirements on the disposition of surplus land and does not take into consideration the unique needs of various local agencies and special districts. District staff would like to have the Legislative Committee’s authority to oppose the bill.