Teaching Crowds: Learning and Social Media Jon Dron and Terry Anderson TEACHING CROWDS

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Teaching Crowds: Learning and Social Media Jon Dron and Terry Anderson TEACHING CROWDS TEACHING CROWDS Issues in Distance Education Series editors: Terry Anderson and David Wiley Distance education is the fastest-growing mode of both formal and informal teaching, training, and learning. It is multi-faceted in nature, encompassing e-learning and mobile learning, as well as immersive learning environments. Issues in Distance Education presents recent research results and offers informative and accessible overviews, analyses, and explorations of current topics and concerns and the technologies employed in distance education. Each volume focuses on critical questions and emerging trends, while also situating these developments within the historical evolution of distance education as a specialized mode of instruction. The series is aimed at a wide group of readers, including teachers, trainers, administrators, researchers, and students. Series Titles The Theory and Practice of Online Learning, Second Edition Edited by Terry Anderson Mobile Learning: Transforming the Delivery of Education and Training Edited by Mohamed Ally A Designer’s Log: Case Studies in Instructional Design Michael Power Accessible Elements: Teaching Science Online and at a Distance Edited by Dietmar Kennepohl and Lawton Shaw Emerging Technologies in Distance Education Edited by George Veletsianos Flexible Pedagogy, Flexible Practice: Notes from the Trenches of Distance Education Edited by Elizabeth Burge, Chère Campbell Gibson, and Terry Gibson Teaching in Blended Learning Environments: Creating and Sustaining Communities of Inquiry Norman D. Vaughan, Martha Cleveland-Innes, and D. Randy Garrison Online Distance Education: Towards a Research Agenda Edited by Olaf Zawacki-Richter and Terry Anderson Teaching Crowds: Learning and Social Media Jon Dron and Terry Anderson TEACHING CROWDS LEARNING AND SOCIAL MEDIA Jon Dron Terry Anderson Copyright © 2014 Jon Dron and Terry Anderson Published by AU Press, Athabasca University 1200, 10011 – 109 Street, Edmonton, AB T5J 3S8 ISBN 978-1-927356-80-7 (print) 978-1-927356-81-4 (PDF) 978-1-927356-82-1 (epub) doi: 10.15215/aupress/9781927356807.01 A volume in Issues in Distance Education ISSN 1919-4382 (print) 1919-4390 (digital) Cover and interior design by Sergiy Kozakov Printed and bound in Canada by Marquis Book Printers Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Dron, Jon, 1961-, author Teaching crowds : learning and social media / Jon Dron and Terry Anderson. (Issues in distance education series) Includes bibliographical references and index. Issued in print and electronic formats. 1. Educational technology. 2. Education--Social aspects. 3. Social learning. 4. Social media. 5. Group work in education. 6. Distance education. 7. Critical pedagogy. I. Anderson, Terry, 1950-, author II. Title. III. Series: Issues in distance education series LB1028.3.D76 2014 371.33 C2014-901074-5 C2014-901075-3 We acknowledge the financial support of the Government of Canada through the Canada Book Fund (CFB) for our publishing activities. Assistance provided by the Government of Alberta, Alberta Multimedia Development Fund. This publication is licensed under a Creative Commons License, Attribution– Noncommercial–NoDerivative Works 4.0 International: see www.creativecommons.org. The text may be reproduced for non-commercial purposes, provided that credit is given to the original author. To obtain permission for uses beyond those outlined in the Creative Commons license, please contact AU Press, Athabasca University, at [email protected]. This text is dedicated to our lifelong friends and wives Kestra (Jon) and Susan (Terry), who have, on too many occasions, felt disconnected from us because we have been connecting with the crowd. We are learning. CONTENTS List of Figures and Tables ix Preface xi Chapter 1 On the Nature and Value of Social Software for Learning 3 Chapter 2 Social Learning Theories 35 Chapter 3 A Typology of Social Forms for Learning 71 Chapter 4 Learning in Groups 93 Chapter 5 Learning in Networks 131 Chapter 6 Learning in Sets 165 Chapter 7 Learning with Collectives 199 Chapter 8 Stories From the Field 237 Chapter 9 Issues and Challenges in Educational Uses of Social Software 275 Chapter 10 The Shape of Things and of Things to Come 299 References 327 Index 349 FIGURES AND TABLES Figures Figure 2.1 Community of Inquiry model 47 Figure 2.2 Activity theory view of a human activity system 51 Figure 2.3 Transactional distance quadrants 63 Figure 2.4 The relationship between transactional control and transactional distance 66 Figure 2.5 Paulsen’s model of cooperative freedoms 67 Figure 2.6 Decagon of cooperative freedoms 69 Figure 3.1 Social forms for learning: sets, nets, and groups 73 Figure 3.2 Venn diagram view of the typology 83 Figure 3.3 View of the typology as a continuum 83 Figure 4.1 Notional levels of control in a typical paced course 99 Figure 5.1 Notional cooperative freedoms in a network 138 Figure 6.1 Notional cooperative freedoms in sets 172 Figure 7.1 A model of how a collective forms 205 Figure 8.1 Screenshot of Elgg’s fine-grained access controls 240 Figure 8.2 Profile page on the AU Landing, showing widgets, tabs, and the “Explore the Landing” menu 254 Figure 8.3 COMP 266 group profile page on the Landing 265 Tables Table 1.1 Examples of social software 11 Table 1.2 Functions of educational social software 30 Table 3.1 Support for social forms in some common social software 79 Table 3.2 Groups, nets, sets, and collectives compared 89 PREFACE Learning is a remarkably social process. Social groups provide the resources for their members to learn. John Seely Brown & Paul Duguid, The Social Life of Information This book is about learning online with other people. Its title, Teaching Crowds, is deliberately ambiguous: the book is about how to teach crowds, but it is also about how crowds teach. What interests us are the ways in which people learn from and with one another in an online context while playing the roles of both learner and teacher—not always intentionally, and not always even as individuals. As we intend to show, there are ways in which the aggregated behaviours of crowds can teach. Between the two of us, we have several decades of experience with using and creating social software for learning, and the time seems ripe to pull together some of what we have learned about learning. More than ever before, the crowd has become the teacher of the crowd, and, more than ever before, we have new tools and new methods with which to teach the crowd. This book is about how that vast cluster of connected individuals can learn together, within the context of institutions and beyond, and can begin to make sense of the torrent of useful and useless information that surrounds us all. In the pages to come, we will describe the theoretical foundations of the use of social software for learning and, building on those foundations, explore ways that such software can be used to support and enable learners to learn. The book begins with an unashamed trumpeting of the potential value of social software for learning. In the opening chapter, we provide an overview of this software and describe the many advantages that may be gained through its effective employment. We hope that this introduction will tempt even skeptics to xi read on and learn more about the benefits, and the pitfalls, of social media as tools for learning. In the second chapter, we present a range of theories—some mature, others still evolving—that have developed in tandem with social learning technologies over the past few decades. Our goal is to offer a theoretical foundation that both explains and predicts the value of different ways of understanding learning in a crowd. We make considerable use of our own three-generation model of distance learning pedagogies, describing the shift from early behaviourist and cognitivist models to the era of social constructivism and then on to the emerging con- nectivist age of distance learning. In addition, we explore a number of other theoretical constructs and approaches, such as the theory of transactional distance, complexity theory, the concept distributed cognition, and the notion of coopera- tive freedoms, that help to frame and illuminate many of the dynamics of social learning in both informal and formal contexts. Having laid the theoretical groundwork for social learning and teaching, in chapter 3, we provide a framework for understanding the different ways in which people engage with one another in a learning situation. We introduce our model of social forms, which categorizes three broad and overlapping modes of social engagement used for learning: groups, networks (or nets), and sets. We also intro- duce the notion of collectives—emergent entities that result from social engage- ment in one or more of the three basic social forms. Until recently, most research into social learning in formal contexts has assumed the centrality of a traditional closed group, with hierarchies, roles, rules, and a strong sense of membership. The closed group is the social form characteristic of classrooms and tutorial groups, in schools and colleges the world over. Social media have, however, made it consider- ably easier to engage with people in other ways, notably through social networks (formed from direct connections between individuals) and social sets (loose com- munities defined by a particular interest, or by place, or by some other shared trait). As a result, the role of collective intelligence has become far more prom- inent than it was in pre-Internet times. Today, it is possible to learn not only from individuals but also from their collective behaviour and interactions. Our contention is that different social forms suggest and sometimes require different approaches to learning and teaching. In chapters 4 to 7, we delve into the details of how learning and teaching happens in groups, networks, sets, and collectives.
Recommended publications
  • Opensocial: from Social Networks to Social Ecosystem
    2007 Inaugural IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (IEEE DEST 2007) OpenSocial: From Social Networks to Social Ecosystem Juliana Mitchell-WongI, Ryszard Kowalczyk', Albena Rosheloval, Bruce Joy2 and Henry Tsai2 'Centre for Information Technology Research, Swinburne University, Hawthorn, VIC, Australia e-mail: (jmitchellwong, rkowalczyk, aroshelova)@ict.swin.edu.au 2Everyday Interactive Networks, Hawthorn, VIC, Australia, e-mail: (brucejoy, henrytsai)@ein.com.au ties to be managed using the one application. GAIM' and Abstract-Unlike the physical world where social ecosys- Trillian2 are two example applications for instant messaging tems are formed from the integrated and managed relation- communities. These applications however do not address ships between individuals and organisations, the online digital any of the fundamental issues: the independent and isolated world consists of many independent, isolated and incompatible nature of communities, the ignorance to overlapping rela- social networks established by organisations that have over- lapping and manually managed relationships. To bring the tionships in different communities, or the manual manage- online digital world in-line with the physical world, integration ment of relationships. of social networks, identification of overlapping relationships Communities on the other hand have moved towards in social networks, and automation of relationship manage- forming alliances with other communities to enable content ment in social networks are required. OpenSocial is a frame- search and retrieval between them by using common ontol- work that enables social networks to interlink and self- use common organise into a social ecosystem guided by the policies of indi- ogy [1]. The of ontology enables communities viduals and organisations. to interlink, but each of these communities assumes that their policies are agreeable by every community in the alli- Index Terms-social framework, self-organised, self- ance.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Participatory Acts and the State
    STRENGTHENING THE STATE THROUGH DISSENT: GLOBAL PARTICIPATORY ACTS AND THE STATE By Patricia Camilien, université Quisqueya INTRODUCTION In Alvin Toffler‟s Future Shock (1970), three types of men coexist on the planet. Men of the present, living in the here and now as they are carried away by the waves and currents of the world; they are rather vulnerable to "future shock". Men of the past, who have remained in a past time long gone, are living in the twentieth century but are still in the twelfth. Men of the future, informed, insightful and perceptive, who are already surfing on the major trends of tomorrow. In today's world, these men of the future are part of a transnational and nomadic elite helped by the increasing liberalization of trade and the disappearance of borders – at the least for them. Transnational companies like oil brokerage firm Trafigura i – made globally (in) famous in 2010 by a journalist‟s tweet about a file hosted on WikiLeaks – exemplify this (future) global world. They enjoy the best of corporate law around the world and diversify their operations accordingly. This use of different national laws according to the benefits they offer is not limited to transnational corporations and their owners, but now extends to individuals who, while they are not billionaires in dollars, are so in reticular connections. Using global participatory acts (heretofore participactions), they seem to be the ones to help the people move from the present to the future. Moral and social entrepreneurs, they are the vanguard of the future changes in society they are trying to drive through networked actions as relayed by mass self- communication.
    [Show full text]
  • Minding the Body Interacting Socially Through Embodied Action
    Linköping Studies in Science and Technology Dissertation No. 1112 Minding the Body Interacting socially through embodied action by Jessica Lindblom Department of Computer and Information Science Linköpings universitet SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden Linköping 2007 © Jessica Lindblom 2007 Cover designed by Christine Olsson ISBN 978-91-85831-48-7 ISSN 0345-7524 Printed by UniTryck, Linköping 2007 Abstract This dissertation clarifies the role and relevance of the body in social interaction and cognition from an embodied cognitive science perspective. Theories of embodied cognition have during the past two decades offered a radical shift in explanations of the human mind, from traditional computationalism which considers cognition in terms of internal symbolic representations and computational processes, to emphasizing the way cognition is shaped by the body and its sensorimotor interaction with the surrounding social and material world. This thesis develops a framework for the embodied nature of social interaction and cognition, which is based on an interdisciplinary approach that ranges historically in time and across different disciplines. It includes work in cognitive science, artificial intelligence, phenomenology, ethology, developmental psychology, neuroscience, social psychology, linguistics, communication, and gesture studies. The theoretical framework presents a thorough and integrated understanding that supports and explains the embodied nature of social interaction and cognition. It is argued that embodiment is the part and parcel of social interaction and cognition in the most general and specific ways, in which dynamically embodied actions themselves have meaning and agency. The framework is illustrated by empirical work that provides some detailed observational fieldwork on embodied actions captured in three different episodes of spontaneous social interaction in situ.
    [Show full text]
  • Apachecon US 2008 with Apache Shindig
    ApacheCon US 2008 Empowering the social web with Apache Shindig Henning Schmiedehausen Sr. Software Engineer – Ning, Inc. November 3 - 7 • New Orleans Leading the Wave of Open Source The Official User Conference of The Apache Software Foundation Freitag, 7. November 2008 1 • How the web became social • Get out of the Silo – Google Gadgets • OpenSocial – A social API • Apache Shindig • Customizing Shindig • Summary November 3 - 7 • New Orleans ApacheCon US 2008 Leading the Wave of Open Source The Official User Conference of The Apache Software Foundation Freitag, 7. November 2008 2 ApacheCon US 2008 In the beginning... Freitag, 7. November 2008 3 ApacheCon US 2008 ...let there be web 2.0 Freitag, 7. November 2008 4 • Web x.0 is about participation • Users have personalized logins Relations between users are graphs • "small world phenomenon", "six degrees of separation", Erdös number, Bacon number November 3 - 7 • New Orleans ApacheCon US 2008 Leading the Wave of Open Source The Official User Conference of The Apache Software Foundation Freitag, 7. November 2008 5 ApacheCon US 2008 The Silo problem Freitag, 7. November 2008 6 • How the web became social • Get out of the Silo – Google Gadgets • OpenSocial – A social API • Apache Shindig • Customizing Shindig • Summary November 3 - 7 • New Orleans ApacheCon US 2008 Leading the Wave of Open Source The Official User Conference of The Apache Software Foundation Freitag, 7. November 2008 7 ApacheCon US 2008 iGoogle Freitag, 7. November 2008 8 • Users adds Gadgets to their homepages Gadgets share screen space • Google experiments with Canvas view Javascript, HTML, CSS • A gadget runs on the Browser! Predefined Gadgets API • Core APIs for IO, JSON, Prefs; optional APIs (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Markets Not Capitalism Explores the Gap Between Radically Freed Markets and the Capitalist-Controlled Markets That Prevail Today
    individualist anarchism against bosses, inequality, corporate power, and structural poverty Edited by Gary Chartier & Charles W. Johnson Individualist anarchists believe in mutual exchange, not economic privilege. They believe in freed markets, not capitalism. They defend a distinctive response to the challenges of ending global capitalism and achieving social justice: eliminate the political privileges that prop up capitalists. Massive concentrations of wealth, rigid economic hierarchies, and unsustainable modes of production are not the results of the market form, but of markets deformed and rigged by a network of state-secured controls and privileges to the business class. Markets Not Capitalism explores the gap between radically freed markets and the capitalist-controlled markets that prevail today. It explains how liberating market exchange from state capitalist privilege can abolish structural poverty, help working people take control over the conditions of their labor, and redistribute wealth and social power. Featuring discussions of socialism, capitalism, markets, ownership, labor struggle, grassroots privatization, intellectual property, health care, racism, sexism, and environmental issues, this unique collection brings together classic essays by Cleyre, and such contemporary innovators as Kevin Carson and Roderick Long. It introduces an eye-opening approach to radical social thought, rooted equally in libertarian socialism and market anarchism. “We on the left need a good shake to get us thinking, and these arguments for market anarchism do the job in lively and thoughtful fashion.” – Alexander Cockburn, editor and publisher, Counterpunch “Anarchy is not chaos; nor is it violence. This rich and provocative gathering of essays by anarchists past and present imagines society unburdened by state, markets un-warped by capitalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Homophily and Polarization in the Age of Misinformation
    Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 225, 2047–2059 (2016) © EDP Sciences, Springer-Verlag 2016 THE EUROPEAN DOI: 10.1140/epjst/e2015-50319-0 PHYSICAL JOURNAL SPECIAL TOPICS Regular Article Homophily and polarization in the age of misinformation Alessandro Bessi1,2, Fabio Petroni3, Michela Del Vicario2, Fabiana Zollo2, Aris Anagnostopoulos3, Antonio Scala4, Guido Caldarelli2,and Walter Quattrociocchi1,a 1 IUSS, Pavia, Italy 2 IMT Institute for Advanced Studies, Lucca, Italy 3 Sapienza University, Roma, Italy 4 ISC-CNR, Roma, Italy Received 1 December 2015 / Received in final form 30 January 2016 Published online 26 October 2016 Abstract. The World Economic Forum listed massive digital misin- formation as one of the main threats for our society. The spreading of unsubstantiated rumors may have serious consequences on public opin- ion such as in the case of rumors about Ebola causing disruption to health-care workers. In this work we target Facebook to characterize information consumption patterns of 1.2 M Italian users with respect to verified (science news) and unverified (conspiracy news) contents. Through a thorough quantitative analysis we provide important in- sights about the anatomy of the system across which misinformation might spread. In particular, we show that users’ engagement on veri- fied (or unverified) content correlates with the number of friends hav- ing similar consumption patterns (homophily). Finally, we measure how this social system responded to the injection of 4, 709 false information. We find that the frequent (and selective) exposure to specific kind of content (polarization) is a good proxy for the detection of homophile clusters where certain kind of rumors are more likely to spread.
    [Show full text]
  • Perceptions of Social Support Within the Context of Religious Homophily: A
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2003 Perceptions of social support within the context of religious homophily: a social network analysis Sally Robicheaux Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Robicheaux, Sally, "Perceptions of social support within the context of religious homophily: a social network analysis" (2003). LSU Master's Theses. 166. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/166 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PERCEPTIONS OF SOCIAL SUPPORT WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF RELIGIOUS HOMOPHILY: A SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in The Department of Sociology by Sally Robicheaux B.A., University of Southwestern Louisiana, 1998 May 2003 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to take this opportunity to thank several people who accompanied me through this process. First, I am deeply indebted to the members of my examining committee, Jeanne S. Hurlbert, John J. Beggs, and Yang Cao, for their keen insight, direction, and contributions to this thesis. I especially wish to thank my committee chair, and advisor, Jeanne S. Hurlbert, for all the invaluable guidance, instruction, and encouragement in helping me design and carry out this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Creating a Simple Website
    TUTORIAL Creating a Simple Website Why having a website? Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................................................... 2 Step 1: create a Google account (Gmail) ................................................................................................. 3 Step 2: create a Google website .............................................................................................................. 4 Step 3: edit a page ................................................................................................................................... 6 Add an hyperlink ................................................................................................................................. 7 Create a new page: .............................................................................................................................. 8 Add an image....................................................................................................................................... 9 Step 4: website page setting .................................................................................................................. 10 The header ......................................................................................................................................... 10 The side bar ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Juror Misconduct in the Digital Age
    GOOGLE, GADGETS, AND GUILT: JUROR MISCONDUCT IN THE DIGITAL AGE THADDEUS HOFFMEISTER* This Article begins by examining the traditional reasons for juror research. The Article then discusses how the Digital Age has created new rationales for juror research while simultaneously affording jurors greater opportunities to conduct such research. Next, the Article examines how technology has also altered juror-to-juror communications and juror-to-non-juror communications. Part I concludes by analyzing the reasons jurors violate court rules about discussing the case. In Part II, the Article explores possible steps to limit the negative impact of the Digital Age on juror research and communications. While no single solution or panacea exists for these problems, this Article focuses on several reform measures that could address and possibly reduce the detrimental effects of the Digital Age on jurors. The four remedies discussed in this Article are (1) penalizing jurors, (2) investigating jurors, (3) allowing jurors to ask questions, and (4) improving juror instructions. During the discussion on jury instructions, this Article analyzes two sets of jury instructions to see how well they adhere to the suggested changes proposed by this Article. This is followed by a draft model jury instruction. * Associate Professor of Law, University of Dayton School of Law. In addition to researching and writing on issues impacting jurors, the author edits a blog titled Juries. Prior to teaching, he served in the military, clerked for a federal judge, and worked on Capitol Hill. He earned his BA (French) from Morgan State University, JD from Northeastern University School of Law, and LLM from Georgetown University Law Center.
    [Show full text]
  • Semantic Homophily in Online Communication: Evidence from Twitter
    A Semantic homophily in online communication: evidence from Twitter SANjA Sˇ CEPANOVI´ C´ , Aalto University IGOR MISHKOVSKI, University Ss. Cyril and Methodius BRUNO GONC¸ALVES, New York University NGUYEN TRUNG HIEU, University of Tampere PAN HUI, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology People are observed to assortatively connect on a set of traits. This phenomenon, termed assortative mixing or sometimes homophily, can be quantified through assortativity coefficient in social networks. Uncovering the exact causes of strong assortative mixing found in social networks has been a research challenge. Among the main suggested causes from sociology are the tendency of similar individuals to connect (often itself referred as homophily) and the social influence among already connected individuals. Distinguishing between these tendencies and other plausible causes and quantifying their contribution to the amount of assortative mixing has been a difficult task, and proven not even possible from observational data. However, another task of similar importance to researchers and in practice can be tackled, as we present here: understanding the exact mechanisms of interplay between these tendencies and the underlying social network structure. Namely, in addition to the mentioned assortativity coefficient, there are several other static and temporal network properties and substructures that can be linked to the tendencies of homophily and social influence in the social network and we herein investigate those. Concretely, we tackle a computer-mediated communication network (based on Twitter mentions) and a particular type of assortative mixing that can be inferred from the semantic features of communication content that we term semantic homophily. Our work, to the best of our knowledge, is the first to offer an in-depth analysis on semantic homophily in a communication network and the interplay between them.
    [Show full text]
  • How to Install the UA Directory Gadget
    How to Install the UA Directory Gadget This "Google gadget" was created to help you search the university's "Enterprise Directory" (EDIR) to locate the email address and phone number of anyone associated with the University of Alaska. This gadget will help you quickly look-up the Google Apps @UA email address of individuals you wish to email, or invite to calendar events, or share Google Docs with, etc. Adding and using the UA Directory gadget with Google Apps email Open your Google Apps@UA email and select "Settings" (upper right corner) Select "Labs", locate "Add a gadget by URL" and select "Enable" Go to the bottom of the page and select "Save Changes" Go back to "Settings" and within Settings, select "Gadgets" Fill in the "Add a gadget by URL with http://www.alaska.edu/google/gadgets/uadirectory.xml Select "Add" (on the right) How to Install the UA Directory Gadget - 1 In your Gadgets section you should see the following If you go back into your email on the left side you should now see the UA Directory Click on the "+" sign to expand the search box At this point, you have the option to authorize the gadget to access your contacts. If you decide to allow access, you will the option of adding the result from the search into your contacts - you will see "Add to Contact". This does not allow access to your account's contacts by anyone else or by any other application. If you choose to not authorize the gadget, the "Add to Contact" link will not be available in the search results.
    [Show full text]
  • Stigmergic Epistemology, Stigmergic Cognition Action Editor: Ron Sun Leslie Marsh A,*, Christian Onof B,C
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Cognitive Sciences ePrint Archive ARTICLE IN PRESS Cognitive Systems Research xxx (2007) xxx–xxx www.elsevier.com/locate/cogsys Stigmergic epistemology, stigmergic cognition Action editor: Ron Sun Leslie Marsh a,*, Christian Onof b,c a Centre for Research in Cognitive Science, University of Sussex, United Kingdom b Faculty of Engineering, Imperial College London, United Kingdom c School of Philosophy, Birkbeck College London, United Kingdom Received 13 May 2007; accepted 30 June 2007 Abstract To know is to cognize, to cognize is to be a culturally bounded, rationality-bounded and environmentally located agent. Knowledge and cognition are thus dual aspects of human sociality. If social epistemology has the formation, acquisition, mediation, transmission and dissemination of knowledge in complex communities of knowers as its subject matter, then its third party character is essentially stigmer- gic. In its most generic formulation, stigmergy is the phenomenon of indirect communication mediated by modifications of the environment. Extending this notion one might conceive of social stigmergy as the extra-cranial analog of an artificial neural network providing epi- stemic structure. This paper recommends a stigmergic framework for social epistemology to account for the supposed tension between individual action, wants and beliefs and the social corpora. We also propose that the so-called ‘‘extended mind’’ thesis offers the requisite stigmergic cognitive analog to stigmergic knowledge. Stigmergy as a theory of interaction within complex systems theory is illustrated through an example that runs on a particle swarm optimization algorithm. Ó 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]