1994:08 the Content and Environmentalimpact from the Waste Depositoryin Sillamae
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
SSI-rapport 94-08 Hans Ehdwall, et al. The content and environmental impact from the waste depository in Sillamae ISSN 0282-4434 Pris: 50 kronor Statens stra/skyddsinstitut Nummer , Number: 94-08 Swedish Radiation Protection Institute ISSN: 0282-4434 Titelblad / Title page Datum' Date of issue: 19940822 Forfattare , Author: Hans Ehdwall, Bjarn Sundblad, Vladimir Nosov, Henno Putnik, Raimo Mustonen, Laina Salonen, Henning Ovale Avdelning , Division: Huvudenheten for karnenergi Dokumentets titel' Title of the document: The content and environmental impact from the waste depositor in Sillamae. Sammanfattning , Abstract: The studies of the waste depository in Sillamae, Estonia, shows that the content as well as the wall material is typical tailings from chemical enrichment of uranium ore. The environmental impact from radioactive substances as well as heavy metals has been estimated. Results show the major radiological impact to the population in the Sillamae town is the exposure to radon and its daughter products emanating from the depository. The impact on the Gulf of Finland is limited to a few hundred metres outside the coast-line. Nyckelord (valda av fMattaren) I Key words (chosen by the author): Sillamae, uranium, waste deposit, thorium, loparite, environmental radiation, modelling. Antal sidor , Number of pages: 40 The Sillamae project - Final Report The content and environmental impact from the waste depository in Sillamae Foreword A project group with members from Finland, Sweden, Estonia In spring 1992, it was decided that and later from Norway was a project investigating radiological established and the first meeting, and other hazards from the waste June 1992, was held in Sillamae depository in Sillamae, Estonia, at the RAS Silmet plant. should be initiated. The objective for this project was to quantify the Financing of the project has been environmental impact of the secured by founds from the depository from the radiological Finnish, the Swedish and the point of view as well as risks from Norwegian governments. The heavy metals at present and in the contribution from Estonia has future. Two scenarios should be been in the form of manpower, studied, the first one was that the without which, this project would integrity of the waste depository have been impossible to fulfil. remains as it is today and the second one if, of some reason, the This report is the result from many whole deposit suddenly at one different contributers. The first instant moment would to slide initial investigations, 1992, were down into the Gulf of Finland. made by staff from the Swedish These two cases are to be Radiation Protection Institute considered as extreme cases and (SSI) and from the Finnish Center would thus cover all other for Radiation and Nuclear Safety thinkable scenarios. (STUK) and the results have earlier been presented in a pre In addition the project should also document (1). propose measures to be taken to reduce present environmental In 1993, the Norwegian Institute impact and, in form of new for Energy Technology, IFE, was projects, investigations and given the assigment to make a measures, propose the more detailed investigation of the continuation of how to remediate depository. This investigation was the waste deposit area. made in cooperation with the Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, NGI, and the Geotechnical 2 Engineering Bureau in Estonia the end of 1993. However, the (GIB). The results from this project group had to postpone that investigation are in detail to a later date. As we today presented in an special report (2). deliver our report to our orders we have behind us a lot of interesting Studsvik EcoSafe was assigned to work and good companionship. It make the modelling of the have been of great value to us to radiological environmental impact have had this opportunity to work for two differnt scenarios where together in this international group the first one was the present and we hope that our work will be situation and the second if, of the input for the future restoration some reason, the content of the work at Sillamae. deposit suddenly was released to the Gulf of Finland. Results from this modelli ng are also presented For the project group in a report (5). The original plans were that this first project should be finished by Hans Ehdwall 3 THE SILLAMAE PROJECT Project group members Mr. Hans Ehdwall Swedish Radiation Protection Institute (SSI) Mr. Bjarn Sundblad Studsvik AB, Sweden Mr. Vladimir Nosov RAS Silmet, Estonia Mr. Henno Putnik Institute of Meteorology and Hydrology, Estonia Mr. Raimo Mustonen Finnish Centre for Radiation and Nuclear Safety (STUK) Mrs. Laina Salonen Finnish Centre for Radiation and Nuclear Safety (STUK) Mr. Henning Ovale Institutt fOr energiteknikk (IFE), Norway 4 Table of contents page No 1 Summary 5 2 Introduction 6 2.1 Background 2.2 The main geological features of the area surrounding the Sillamae waste depository 3 Material and methods 10 3.1 Pond 3.1.1 Radioactive elements 3.1.2 Chemical compounds 3.1.3 Stability 3.2 Ground water 3.3 Radon measurements 3.4 Marine 3.4.1 Chemical 3.4.2 Radioactive 3.4.3 Erosion of coast line 4 Results and discussion 17 4.1 Pond 4.1.1 Radioactive elements 4.1.2 Chemical compounds 4.1.3 Stability 4.2 Ground water 4.3 Radon measurements 4.4 Marine 4.4.1 . Chemical 4.4.2 Radiactive 4.4.3 Erosion of coast line 5 Risk assesment - modelling 25 6 Recommendations 27 -new waste management (new project) -stabilisation -decreasing Rn emanation -decreasing gamma exposure -decreasing leakage into sea -constructions outside waste pond (warnings) -future use of site - documentation -information - general public - authorities 7 Conclusions 29 8 Tables 31 5 The content and environmental impact from the waste depository in Sillamae 1 Summary Gulf of Finland are in both cases During 1992 and 1993, estimated to be in the order of 1 investigations of the waste manSv. Individual committed depository in Sillamae have been doses are estimated to be 1 and 2 made. Samples for the evaluation IlSV, respectively. of radioactive substances as well as heavy metals have been taken The results of the study indicate from the deposit and its sur that the isotopic enrichment of roundings. 235U has not been performed at the Sillamae plant. Also there The major radiological impact to were no indications of dumping the population in the town of other kinds of radioactive waste in Sillamae comes from the the depository. inhalation of airborne radon and its daug hter products. The The project group proposes that environmental impact to the Gulf the Sillamae project continues. Its of Finland can be observed only task should be to investigate the to the immediate coast line just possibilities for the restoration of outside the depository. the area. But before that the stability has to be investigated Collective committed radiation further and the limitation of doses during 50 years for the erosion of the coast line must be present release and in the case of considered. a sudden release of the whole content of the depository into the 6 2 Introduction 2.1 Background nium (about 0.03%) and in particular thorium (0.6%). Since Sillamae is a small town in north 1977, no uranium ore has been east Estonia, some 185 km east of processed at the plant. Today the Tallinn. It has about 20 000 plant is operating only about inhabitants and has been 15-20% of its production capacity developed around the Sillamae due to shortage of raw material Metallurgy Plant, today the state and chemicals for the process. joint-stock company called RAS Silmet. Until recently, the plant be The waste from the uranium longed to and was managed by processing was transported to the the USSR Ministry of first marine terrace of Paite cape Medium-Scale Engineering and its near the plant and stored at the production was uranium for surface until 1959, when a waste military and civil use. depository was established. The depository has been re The Sillamae Plant was built in constructed a couple of times in 1948 as a top secret facility, the last decades and in 1969-70 it originally for processing was expanded to its present size. alum-shale (about 0.03% of U) Waste material from inside of the from Estonia. Later uranium ore depository was then used for the from eastern Europe (up to 1% of construction of the walls of the U) was processed. As a total, 4 impoundment. From 1977 to 1989 013 000 tons of uranium ore were the depository has been used for processed at the plant. Most of the disposal of oil-shale ash and the ore was brought from wastes from loparite processing. Czechoslovakia (2.2 million tons) The annual volume of disposal of and from Hungary (1.2 million loparite waste in recent years had tons). Minor amounts of uranium been about 20 000 tons per year, ore were brought from Poland, and oil-shale ash has been Romania, Bulgaria and DDR. Until disposed over neighbouring area 1970, only uranium ore and in west from the main depository alum-shale were processed at the during the last years. plant. In the beginning of the Today, the depository is an oval 1970s the plant switched to proc retention impoundment on the essing of loparite - a mineral from waterfront of the Gulf of Finland the Kola Peninsula rich in niobium, with an overall area of about 330 tantalum and rare earth metals. In 000 m2, containing some 8 million addition loparite also contains m3 (about 12 million tons) of elevated concentrations of ura- wastes, the top of the dam being 7 about 25 meters above sea level. shales (age ca.