DOCSLIB.ORG

The Relationship Between Social Anxiety and Leadership Emergence: a Resource Perspective

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Relationship Between Social Anxiety and Leadership Emergence: a Resource Perspective The Relationship between Social Anxiety and Leadership Emergence: A Resource Perspective by Katherine Naomi Rau A thesis submitted to the College of Psychology and Liberal Arts at Florida Institute of Technology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master’s of Science in Industrial-Organizational Psychology Melbourne, Florida September, 2018 We the undersigned committee hereby approve the attached thesis, “The Relationship between Social Anxiety and Leadership Emergence: A Resource Perspective,” by Katherine Naomi Rau. _________________________________________________ Dr. Jessica Wildman Associate Professor Industrial Organizational Psychology _________________________________________________ Dr. Lisa Steelman Interim Dean COPLA Professor and Program Chair Industrial Organizational Psychology _________________________________________________ Dr. Kimberly Demoret Assistant Professor Aerospace, Physics and Space Sciences _________________________________________________ Dr. Lisa Steelman Interim Dean COPLA Professor and Program Chair Industrial Organizational Psychology Abstract The Relationship between Social Anxiety and Leadership Emergence: A Resource Perspective Author: Katherine Rau Advisor: Jessica Wildman, Ph.D. Despite its certain prevalence, mental illness has remained largely unstudied in the field of Industrial-Organizational Psychology. The research at hand addresses a widening gap in the literature: what does mental illness mean for leadership, particularly leadership emergence? In attempting to answer this question, I examined the experience of social anxiety as it is the most commonly diagnosed anxiety disorder and has particular relevance to the workplace. By utilizing a resource perspective, I found that controlling for personality, social anxiety did significantly predict emotional exhaustion in terms of both frequency and intensity. Emotional exhaustion and professional self-efficacy significantly predicted leadership emergence but were not found to act as parallel mediators in the relationship between social anxiety and leadership emergence when controlling for personality. Additionally, psychological safety was not found to significantly moderate the relationship between social anxiety and leadership emergence after iii controlling for personality. Familiarity was found to mitigate the negative effects of social anxiety on professional self-efficacy but only mitigated the negative effects of social anxiety on emotional exhaustion for those with low levels of social anxiety. Future research is needed to further explore the sequential ordering of the burnout facets and investigate what other interventions may reduce the emotional exhaustion experienced by socially anxious individuals. iv Table of Contents Table of Contents................................................................................................. v! List of Figures .................................................................................................... vii! List of Tables ..................................................................................................... vii! Acknowledgement............................................................................................. viii! Introduction ......................................................................................................... 1! Literature Review ................................................................................................ 5! Leadership .................................................................................................................. 5! Leadership emergence .............................................................................................. 6! Social Anxiety ........................................................................................................... 10! Prevalent frameworks of social anxiety ................................................................... 13! Social anxiety and personality ................................................................................ 16! Known associated outcomes ................................................................................... 18! Psychological Safety ................................................................................................. 20! Perceptions of psychological safety ........................................................................ 21! Conservation of Resources Theory .......................................................................... 22! Burnout .................................................................................................................. 22! Social support......................................................................................................... 24! Hypothesis Development ................................................................................... 26! Study 1 ............................................................................................................... 37! Methods .................................................................................................................... 37! Participants ............................................................................................................ 37! Procedure and materials.......................................................................................... 37! Social Anxiety ................................................................................................................ 38! Personality...................................................................................................................... 38! Leadership Emergence .................................................................................................... 39! Results ....................................................................................................................... 39! Study 2 ............................................................................................................... 42! Methods .................................................................................................................... 42! Participants ............................................................................................................ 42! Procedure and materials.......................................................................................... 43! Emotional Exhaustion ..................................................................................................... 43! Professional Self-Efficacy ............................................................................................... 43! Familiarity with Team Members ..................................................................................... 44! Psychological Safety ....................................................................................................... 44! Results ....................................................................................................................... 44! v Exploratory Analyses ........................................................................................ 50! Overall Discussion ............................................................................................. 52! Limitations and Future Directions ........................................................................... 56! Conclusions ............................................................................................................... 59! References .......................................................................................................... 61! Appendix A Survey Measures ........................................................................... 72! Appendix B Figures ........................................................................................... 77! Appendix C Tables ............................................................................................ 82! vi List of Figures Figure 1. Theoretical Model of Proposed Relationships ....................................... 77! Figure 2. Distribution of Social Anxiety Scores in Study 1 .................................. 78! Figure 3. Distribution of Social Anxiety Scores in Study 2 .................................. 79! Figure 4. Parallel Mediation Results for Hypothesis 5 .......................................... 80! Figure 5. The Interaction Effect of Familiarity and Social Anxiety on General Emotional Exhaustion .................................................................................. 80! Figure 6. The Interaction Effect of Familiarity and Social Anxiety on Professional Self-Efficacy ................................................................................................ 81! vii List of Tables Table 1. Descriptive Statistics for Unstandardized Predictor and Criterion Measures in Study 1 .................................................................................................... 82! Table 2. Uncorrected Correlations for Study 1 Variables ..................................... 82! Table 3. Summary of Regression Analysis for Predictor Variables on Other-rated Leadership Emergence in Study 1 ................................................................ 83! Table 4. Summary of Regression Analysis for Predictor Variables on Self-rated Leadership Emergence in Study 1 ................................................................ 84! Table 5. Summary of Regression Analysis for Extraversion and Social Anxiety on Self-rated Leadership
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment of Social Anxiety Disorder and Comorbid Paranoid Schizophrenia Monnica T
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications, Department of Psychology Psychology, Department of 2015 Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment of Social Anxiety Disorder and Comorbid Paranoid Schizophrenia Monnica T. Williams University of Louisville, [email protected] Michelle C. Capozzoli University of Nebraska–Lincoln, [email protected] Erica V. Buckner University of Louisville David Yuska University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/psychfacpub Part of the Clinical Psychology Commons, and the Personality and Social Contexts Commons Williams, Monnica T.; Capozzoli, Michelle C.; Buckner, Erica V.; and Yuska, David, "Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment of Social Anxiety Disorder and Comorbid Paranoid Schizophrenia" (2015). Faculty Publications, Department of Psychology. 711. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/psychfacpub/711 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Psychology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications, Department of Psychology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in Clinical Case Studies 14:5 (2015), pp. 323– 341. doi 10.1177/1534650114559717 Copyright © 2014 Monnica T. Williams, Michelle C. Capozzoli, Erica V. Buckner, and David Yusko; published by SAGE Publications. Used by permission. digitalcommons.unl.edu Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment of Social Anxiety Disorder
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Relationship Between Social Anxiety and Personality
    Contractor and Sarkar: Relationship between Social anxiety and personality 107 Original Research Article Understanding the Relationship between Social Anxiety and Personality Ruhee Contractor1, Sejal Sarkar2 1,2Department of Psychology, K.C College, Mumbai. Corresponding author: Ms. Ruhee Contractor Email –[email protected] ABSTRACT Background: Previous studies on the relationship between social anxiety and personality have found that certain components of The Big Five such as neuroticism and extraversion are related to social anxiety. There is little data available on this relationship of social anxiety in Indian university students even though, past researchers have found that social phobia leads to impairment in various aspects of life. Thus, this research tried to narrow these gaps and explore the links between social anxiety and personality in Indian university students. Methods: The sample consisted of N=121 participants and they were asked to complete two questionnaires - The Big Five Factor Inventory and the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale (LSAS). A subscale of the LSAS i.e. total avoidance was measured to find its relationship with the Big Five. Pearson's correlation and multiple regressions were used to analyse the data. Results: Findings indicated that personality, in particular, high neuroticism and low extraversion, may play an important role in the manifestation of social anxiety. Interpretations and implications of predictive importance of the interaction of personality traits and avoidance in anxiety are discussed, and further speculations about different interventions and cross-cultural studies have been put forth. Conclusion:The strength of this study is that it is one of the few research studies done in India which look at this relationship.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Phobias Pp
    WINTER 2020 BalancedLiving Social Phobias pp. 6-7 Understanding Dementia: Tips for Caregivers pp. 8-9 ...Also In this issue... Why I Use Psychotherapy Stress Signals MINES Eye: 10 Minute Mindfulness Walk & Brief Meditation BalancedLiving WINTER 2020 MINES & Associates 10367 West Centennial Road Littleton, Colorado 80127 800.873.7138 www.MINESandAssociates.com . CREDITS . A word from your Employee Assistance Program... The Staywell Company, LLC ©2020 Why I Use Psychotherapy pg. 4 Welcome to the Winter 2020 issue of BalancedLiving! Stress Signals pg. 5 National Institute of Mental Health 2020 has been a challenging year for all of us, but we hope (NIMH) ©2020 that the resources we provide in this publication, as well as Social Phobias pp. 6-7 the services that MINES provides you through the EAP have Life Advantages - Author Delvina Miremadi ©2020 Understanding Dementia: Tips for whenhelped it to comes, make developit easier. yourTo help mindfulness finish out theskills, year and strong provide we Caregivers pp. 8-9 somehave fill support this issue to caregivers with more that resources are caring to help for lovedmanage ones! stress The MINES Team MINES Eye: 10 Minute Mindfulness Walk On page 4 we start off with an article talking about why & Brief Meditation pg. 10 someone may want to use therapy and how it can be useful. Next we look at the stress signals our body gives us when we www.food.com Recipe: Traditional Irish Shepherd’s Pie are under pressure. On page 6 there is a discussion on social pg. 11 phobias, on of the most common of all phobias.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Social Anxiety in Children and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder
    Assessment of Social Anxiety in Children and Adolescents With Autism Spectrum Disorder Nicole L. Kreiser and Susan W. White, Department of Psychology, Virginia Tech Despite the high prevalence of social anxiety in individ- American Psychiatric Association [APA], 2013), it is sta- uals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), there is little ted that social anxiety is a hallmark of ASD. Van Steensel agreement on how to best assess such problems in this et al. (2011), in a meta-analytic review of anxiety disor- population. To inform evidence-based assessment, we ders in ASD, estimated that approximately 16.6% of peo- ple under 18 with ASD have comorbid social anxiety conducted a comprehensive review of research that has disorder (SAD). Considerable debate exists regarding the assessed social anxiety in children and adolescents with nosology of anxiety in people with ASD and whether ASD without co-occurring intellectual disability. social anxiety is better characterized as a part of ASD or a Although some evidence in support of the reliability of comorbid disorder (Wood & Gadow, 2010). Despite existing measures exists, there are concerns about overlap in diagnostic criteria between SAD and ASD, inflated estimates of the co-occurrence of social anxiety there is little empirical guidance on how to most accu- because of symptom overlap with ASD diagnostic crite- rately assess symptoms of social anxiety in people with ria, and the diagnostic sensitivity of existing measures is ASD. The uncertain reliability and validity of currently questionable. Recommendations for clinical assessment utilized measures to assess anxiety in individuals with of social anxiety in this population and future directions ASD and the need for the development of measures that for research on this topic, including the development of assess the unique and distinct features of anxiety in indi- new measures, are provided.
    [Show full text]
  • Self-Help Strategies for Social Anxiety
    SELF-HELP STRATEGIES FOR SOCIAL ANXIETY Step 1: Learning about anxiety This is a very important first step since it helps you to understand what is happening when you are feeling uncomfortable in social situations. All the worries and physical feelings you are experiencing have a name: ANXIETY. Learn the facts about anxiety. FACT 1: Anxiety is normal and adaptive because it helps us prepare for danger (for instance, our heart beats faster to pump blood to our muscles so we have the energy to run away or fight off danger). Therefore, the goal is to learn to manage anxiety, not eliminate it. FACT 2: Anxiety can become a problem when our body tells us that there is danger when there is no real danger. To learn more details about anxiety, see What Is Anxiety? Step 2: Learning about social anxiety People with social anxiety tend to fear and avoid social situations. They are very concerned that they will do something embarrassing, or that others will judge them. It is normal to feel anxious in social situations from time to time. For example, most people feel anxious when they have to speak in front of a large group. Social anxiety becomes a problem when it becomes quite distressing and starts getting in the way of your ability to function and enjoy life. However, it is important to note that you are not alone. Social anxiety is one of the most common anxiety disorders. The good news is that there are strategies you can use to help manage your social fears.
    [Show full text]
  • Anxiety Disorders
    Anxiety Disorders Everyone experiences anxiety. However, when feelings of intense fear and distress are overwhelming and prevent us from doing everyday things, an anxiety disorder may be the cause. Anxiety disorders are the most common mental health concern in the United States. An estimated 40 million adults in the U.S., or 18%, have an anxiety disorder. Approximately 8% of children and teenagers experience the negative impact of an anxiety disorder at school and at home. Symptoms Just like with any mental illness, people with anxiety disorders experience symptoms differently. But for most people, anxiety changes how they function day-to-day. People can experience one or more of the following symptoms: Emotional symptoms: • Feelings of apprehension or dread • Feeling tense and jumpy • Restlessness or irritability • Anticipating the worst and being watchful for signs of danger Physical symptoms: • Pounding or racing heart and shortness of breath • Upset stomach • Sweating, tremors and twitches • Headaches, fatigue and insomnia • Upset stomach, frequent urination or diarrhea Types of Anxiety Disorders Different anxiety disorders have various symptoms. This also means that each type of anxiety disorder has its own treatment plan. The most common anxiety disorders include: • Panic Disorder. Characterized by panic attacks—sudden feelings of terror— sometimes striking repeatedly and without warning. Often mistaken for a heart attack, a panic attack causes powerful, physical symptoms including chest pain, heart palpitations, dizziness, shortness of breath and stomach upset. • Phobias. Most people with specific phobias have several triggers. To avoid panicking, someone with specific phobias will work hard to avoid their triggers. Depending on the type and number of triggers, this fear and the attempt to control it can seem to take over a person’s life.
    [Show full text]
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Versus Social Anxiety Disorder
    © Marking a Difference Tips for Clinicians no. 1 Autism Spectrum Disorder versus Social Anxiety Disorder Differential diagnosis is important because neurological underpinnings, etiologies, and prognoses vary for different disorders. Diagnosed behaviorally, Autism Spectrum Disorder and Social Anxiety Disorder both present with deficits in social interaction; additionally, ASD and SAD may overlap and diverge throughout development. Although several features of the two disorders are similar, there are important differences that should be considered for diagnosis and treatment. The checklist below is provided to help practitioners distinguish between Autism Spectrum Disorders and Social Anxiety Disorder (also known as Social Phobia). This sheet is meant to be used as a support for experienced practitioners. If in doubt, practitioners should consult directly with specialists in relevant fields. Similarities Deficits in: • Reduced eye contact • Social interaction • Awkward nonreciprocal • Social interests interactions • Social skills • Lack of communication • Expressing emotion • Social withdrawal • Challenges and biases in • Preference for being alone reading facial expressions • Passivity Differences Autism Spectrum Disorders Social Anxiety Disorder • Early onset • Onset typically in early adolescence • Delays in socialization • Early temperament labeled as “shy” • Less responsive to emotional contagion or • Capable of age-appropriate friendships facial mimicry • Fear of social evaluation • Weak theory of mind • Diverts attention away from self • Language delays or deficits • Unrealistic social standards • Repetitive and restricted behaviors • Fidgeting and nervous habits • Repetitive motor mannerisms • Amygdala hyperactivity • Below normal amygdala activity • Attentional bias towards threatening • Avoidance and social fears are not core stimuli (hypervigilance) features of ASD Key Questions: 1. Does the individual demonstrate age appropriate insight into self and others? (more characteristic of SAD) 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnosing Depression and Anxiety in Pediatric Primary Care
    Diagnosing Depression and Anxiety in Pediatric Primary Care Kelley Victor, MD Victoria Winkeller, MD Overall Goals and Objectives • Part I: Identification of Depression and Anxiety • Part II: Depression & Anxiety Interventions in Primary Care o Non-pharmacologic treatment o Pharmacologic treatment o Understanding how to initiate care • Part III: Pulling it All Together o Evaluating risks/benefits for pharmacologic vs. non-pharmacologic interventions o Providing rational interventions 2 Part I: Objectives • Understand the incidence/prevalence of depression and anxiety in childhood/adolescence. • Understand common risk factors for the development of depression and anxiety. • Understand comorbidities of depression and anxiety. • Understand how to systematically identify children and adolescents with depression and anxiety in your pediatric office. • Use of screening tools to aide in identification of children and adolescents with depression and anxiety disorders 3 Depression 4 Depression: Incidence/Prevalence • In 2015, 30% of H.S. students reported feeling sad or hopeless in the previous 12 months (CDC, 2016) • 20% of teens will become clinically depressed prior to adulthood • 5-10% of teens have sub-syndromal symptoms • 2% of children and 4-8% of teens are depressed at any one time (AACAP, 2007) • Female to male ratio is 1:1 for children and 2:1 for adolescents • Point prevalence for adolescents with depression being seen in primary care is up to 28% (GLAD-PC:II, 2007) 5 Depression: Risk Factors • Family history of depression, mood disorders
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Social Anxiety in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Psychometric
    Running head: PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF SOCIAL ANXIETY MEASURES IN ASD Measuring Social Anxiety in Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Psychometric Properties of Self-Report Instruments Authors: Kelsie A. Boulton1,2, & Adam J. Guastella1,2 1. Autism Clinic for Translational Research, Brain and Mind Centre, Children’s Hospital Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, 2050, Australia. 2. Child Neurodevelopment and Mental Health Team, Brain and Mind Centre, Children’s Hospital Westmead Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, 2050, Australia. Please address correspondence to: Prof Adam Guastella Brain & Mind Centre The University of Sydney 100 Mallett Street Camperdown, NSW 2050 Australia [email protected] PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF SOCIAL ANXIETY MEASURES IN ASD 2 Abstract Adults with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are at elevated risk for social anxiety disorder (SAD). Limited information exists on the appropriateness of using social anxiety instruments with these adults. This study examines psychometric properties of self-report social anxiety instruments in autistic adults without intellectual disability, compared to adults with SAD. Additionally, we compared instrument scores between autistic adults with a dual diagnosis of SAD and adults with SAD only. Adults diagnosed with SAD (N=316) or ASD (N=102) were recruited from the Brain and Mind Centre in New South Wales, Australia. Sixty autistic participants received a diagnosis of SAD. Participants completed the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale-self-report, the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale, the Social Phobia Scale, and the Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale. All instruments showed excellent internal consistency in autistic adults.
    [Show full text]
  • What Causes Social Anxiety?
    Social anxiety, also called social phobia, is a disorder characterized by overwhelming anxiety and excessive self-consciousness in everyday social situations. People with social anxiety have a persistent, intense, and chronic fear of being watched and judged by others and of being embarrassed or humiliated by their own actions. Their fear may be so severe that it interferes with work or school - and other ordinary activities. While many people with social anxiety recognize that their fear of being around people may be excessive or unreasonable, they are unable to overcome it. They often worry for days or weeks in advance of a dreaded situation. Social anxiety can be limited to only one type of situation - such as a fear of speaking in formal or informal situations, or eating or drinking in front of others - or, in its most severe form, may be so broad that a person experiences symptoms almost anytime they are around other people. Social anxiety can be very debilitating - it may even keep people from going to work or school on some days. Many people with this illness have a hard time making and keeping friends. Physical symptoms often accompany the intense anxiety of social anxiety and include blushing, profuse sweating, trembling, and other symptoms of anxiety, including difficulty talking and nausea or other stomach discomfort. These visible symptoms heighten the fear of disapproval and the symptoms themselves can become an additional focus of fear. Fear of symptoms can create a vicious cycle: as people with social anxiety worry about experiencing the symptoms, the greater their chances of developing the symptoms.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuroticism and Perfectionism As Predictors of Social Anxiety
    PAID-07938; No of Pages 5 Personality and Individual Differences xxx (2016) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Personality and Individual Differences journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/paid Neuroticism and perfectionism as predictors of social anxiety Jennifer Newby a,VictoriaA.Pituraa,⁎, Alexander M. Penney a,1,RupertG.Kleina, Gordon L. Flett b,PaulL.Hewittc a Lakehead University, Canada b York University, Canada c University of British Columbia, Canada article info abstract Article history: Prior research has demonstrated relationships between neuroticism, perfectionism, and social anxiety. This study Received 11 August 2016 examined whether trait perfectionism (particularly socially prescribed perfectionism [SPP]) and perfectionistic Received in revised form 21 October 2016 self-presentation predicted social interaction and evaluation anxiety while controlling for neuroticism. It also ex- Accepted 28 October 2016 plored which neuroticism facets uniquely predicted social anxiety. Participants (N = 271) completed self-report Available online xxxx measures assessing: social anxiety, trait perfectionism, perfectionistic self-presentation, and neuroticism. Most notably, results showed that the self-consciousness, vulnerability, and impulsiveness facets of neuroticism Keywords: Social anxiety uniquely predicted interaction anxiety. Conversely, the self-consciousness, vulnerability, and anxiety facets Trait perfectionism uniquely predicted evaluation anxiety. Furthermore, while controlling for neuroticism, both SPP and
    [Show full text]
  • The Anxiety Disorders
    The Anxiety Disorders M. Sean Stanley, MD Assistant Professor OHSUOHSU Psychiatry “The Desperate Man” (1844-45) Gustave Courbet Generalized Anxiety Disorder Panic Disorder Specific Phobia Social Phobia (Social Anxiety Disorder) Adjustment Disorder with Anxiety Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Substance/Medication-Induced Anxiety Disorder OHSUAnxiety Disorder Due to Another Medical Condition Illness Anxiety Disorder Major Depressive Disorder, with anxious distress Bipolar Disorder, most recent episode manic, with anxious distress Borderline Personality Disorder What I’m talking about… and what I’m not talking about*. DSM-5 Anxiety Disorders DSM-5 Anxiety Disorder (diagnosed in children) Generalized Anxiety Disorder Selective Mutism Panic Disorder Separation Anxiety Specific Phobia Social Anxiety Disorder (Social Phobia) DSM-5 Trauma- and Stressor-Related Disorders Substance/Medication-Induced Anxiety Disorder Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Anxiety Disorder Due to Another Medical Condition Adjustment Disorder with Anxiety DSM-5 Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders DSM-5 Trans-diagnostic Specifiers Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Panic Attack DSM-5 Somatic Symptom and Related Disorders OHSUAnxious Distress Illness Anxiety Disorder Somatic Symptom Disorder *well, maybe just a little First Things First Is all anxiety bad? Anxiety/worry can help us: • Prepare for challenges • Keep ourselves and others safe • Keep up on responsibilities OHSU• Be respectful to others First Things First What is the difference between anxiety and fear? OHSU First Things First Anxiety Fear Insidious onset for to prepare for challenge Rapid onset survival response Primarily Cognitive Primarily non-cognitive Less Intense autonomic arousal Intense autonomic arousal OHSUMuscle Tension, Vigilance, Ruminative Thought Fight or flight, Escape behaviors, Tachycardia Protracted Brief/Discrete Some overlap First Things First GAD Cat Panic Cat OHSUFor most people, anxiety and fear are appropriately activated/deactivated.
    [Show full text]