CHAPTER XVI the Battle of Romani Had Changed the Whole Character of the Campaign. the Signal Turkish Failure There Had Thrown Th

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CHAPTER XVI the Battle of Romani Had Changed the Whole Character of the Campaign. the Signal Turkish Failure There Had Thrown Th CHAPTER XVI TOWARDS CAZA THEBattle of Romani had changed the whole character of the campaign. The signal Turkish failure there had thrown the enemy at once upon the defensive, and in the two years which followed he did not rally again to a definite advance upon Egypt. Murray’s movement across Sinai had, nevertheless, been of a progressive defensive nature rather than an ambitious aggression; and it was not until after the capture of El Arish and the sparkling little victories at Magdhaba and Rafa that the Commander-in-Chief ventured upon a concrete plan for the invasim of Palestine. IJis condition and immediate prospects at that time were calculated to awaken the ambition of any military leader. The railway was rapidly approaching El Arish, and, with supplies coming in from the sea, communi- cations were highly satisfactory. The weather was cool, and four months were available for operations before the return of the summer; his troops were hard and fresh, and elated by the Magdhaba and Rafa victories; his infantry was rapidly increasing in numbers and would soon be four divisions strong, while a second division of mounted troops was in process of formation. At last on the rolling plains of southern Palestine he had ground suitable for his infantry; it hitherto had been merely a force behind which the Anzac Mounted Division might find shelter in the event of the enemy attempting a dangerous counter-attack. At last, moreover, there was country on which wheels could move without sinking to their hubs. The cumbersome pedrails were stripped from the guns, the horse-teams were reduced from eight (and even ten) to six, and the artillery was promised its normal battle-activity. At the same time the “general service ” waggons re-appeared, and enormously lightened the transport work of the divisions. The huge camel-trains, which during the Sinai advance were the only means of carrying supplies, had made the campaign possible, and had done all that cotild be expected of them. But at best camel-transport is exceedingly slow, and like a snow- 244 Jan.-Feb., 19171 TOWARDS GAZA 245 ball in its operation. It entails excessive handling of supplies, the feeding of thousands of camels and their drivers-which in themselves impose heavy additional work upon the railway -and the employment and maintenance of a further large number of animals and their attendants. Until the very end of the campaign at Aleppo camels were always extensively used, atid were sometimes the sole means of transport; but wherever possible they were displaced by motor-lorries and horse-drawn waggons and limbers. In the ambulances the change to hard ground led to the abandonment of the sand- sleighs. and the use of motors and horse-vehicles became general, though unhappily the camel cacolets had to be retained for use in the hills. But perhaps most important of all the changes brought about by the deliverance from the desert was the increased mobility given to the mounted troops. Prodigious things had been done by the horses on Sinai. They had revealed a capacity to endure without water scarcely inferior to that of the camels, to which as a means of transport for mounted rifles they had proved incomparably superior. Nevertheless they had been painfully restricted by the heavy sand. Frnm the Canal to El Arish they had rarely moved beyond a walking pace. The slowness of their marching and the increased carrying of supplies which it had entailed, as in the expedition against Maghara, had prolonged all operations and necessitated the employment of many thousands of extra camels and great numbers of drivers. Sir Archibald, again, was well pleased with the conduct of recent operations by his two new lieutenants, Dobell and Chetwode, and might well have believed that he now possessed generals to whom he could safely entrust the translation of his Cairo strategy into vigorous and successful action. But, as at Romani, one vital essential was still lacking in his force at El Arish. The army was without the inspiration of robust leadership. Murray, directing the campaign from Cairo, was in almost the same position as a minister of war at Whitehall who sometimes insists in meddling with the tactics of a distant army. The Commander-in-Chief was quite unable from his headquarters at the Savoy Hotel to master in detail the conditions in southern Palestine ; nor was he disposed, or 246 SINAI AND PALESTINE [Jan.-Feb., 1917 authorised by his Government, to delegate a proper measure of responsibility to his subordinates. As a minister for war he was far too active; as a commander-in-chief he was not nearly active enough. To make matters worse, Murray was from Romani onwards an unpopular leader with his troops. Officers and nien of Anzac Mounted Division interpreted his unfortunate despatch concerning that engagement, and the consequent issue of awards, as an active demonstration of prejudice. The extreme measures of discipline imposed on both his mounted troops and his infantry, during their rare and brief periods of leave in Cairo and Port Said, caused General Headquarters as a whole to be looked upon in a spirit far from cordial. The men cheerfully accepted as part of their voluntary service all the disciplinary measures which had any conceivable bearing upon the efficient conduct of the war, But the degree to which the nien visiting Cairo and Port Said were angered by exclusion from the reputable hotels, and worried about formalities-while at the same time no sane steps were taken to safeguard their welfare in other directions-engendered a feeling of bitterness which did not contribute to the success of operations, All British soldiers are hero-worshippers, and Murray was not in their eyes a hero. The front was without any sense of the presence of a great leader. In February Murray decided, as a preliminary to his general advance, to clean up the remaining Turkish garrisons in Sinai. Columns were sent against El Hassana, which lies in the hills some thirty-three miles south-south-west of Magdhaba, and against Nekhl, the old seat of British adminis- tration. The 2nd Battalion (British) of the Camel Brigade, under Major Bassett, marched from Magdhaba on February 17th and, travelling by night, surrounded Hassana at dawn on the following morning. On the appearance of the force the Turks surrendered without resistance. Throughout the campaign the extremely unsanitary conditions under which the Turks lived and fought were a constant source of amaze- ment to the British army. The Hassana post was indescribably filthy. A dead camel lay in the middle of the camp, and a dead cow in a building close beside the house occupied by the Commandant, who, however, appeared quite indifferent to its 17th-18th Feb., 19171 TOWARDS GAZA 247 presence. While the post was being surrounded, Lance- Corporal AIacGregor was shot and severely wounded by arnied Bedouins; it was found impossible to evacuate him on a camel cacolet, and he was therefore carried back to El Arish in one of the aeroplanes which had been co-operating with the force. Three columns were employed for the conquest of Nekhl. A yeonianry force marched from Suez by the Mitla Pass and the Darb el Haj; Lieutenant-Colonel Grant led the 11th Australian Light Horse Regiment and one conipany of the Camel Brigade out from Serapeum by the Wady um Muksheib, Bir el Giddi, and the Baha Pass; while Bassett, after securing Hassana, was to endeavour to block the escape of the enemy towards the east. The garrison was known to be insignificant, and the use of so much strength by the British was intended to make a clean and final sweep of the enemy from Sinai, and also to impress the Bedouins. Nekhl, with its few stone houses, a mosque, and a well, situated on the heights of the forbidding desert ranges, was entered on February 17th-three days after Grant’s force left the Canal-by a squadron of the 11th Light Horse, riding with fixed bayonets, under Captain C. A. R. Munro. Grant on his approach learned from a British airman that the garrison was evacuating, and accordingly pushed in without waiting for the arrival of the column from Suez. A few Turks and armed Arabs were taken, and the espedition definitely marked the expulsion of the Turks from the Peninsula; but it is chiefly to be remembered because of the fine marching accomplished by the camel- transport which accompanied Grant’s column. The camels, led by Egyptians on foot, covered 150 miles in seven con- secutive days-a wonderful feat of endurance over a route which ran most of the way along steep and narrow mountain tracks, rocky and difficult. Sinai was tiow clear ; but much preliminary work was still necessary before the army could be directed towards Palestine. IIaving allowed Chauvel’s horsemen to debouch f roni the desert without opposition and secure a foothold on the firm soil of the plains, the Turks were obliged to fall right back to the Gaza-Beersheba line in order to secure a strong defensive position based on an adequate supply of water. For some weeks they left a garrison of about 4,000 troops in a carefully 248 SINAI AND PALESTINE [Jan.-Mar., 1917 prepared position at Weli Sheikh Nuran, a few miles west of Shellal; but the fate of Magdhaba and Rafa had made them heartily respect the Anzac brigades and the Camels, and early in March this force was withdrawn. This left the country ahead of the British clear for about thirty miles, from El Arish to the Gaza-Beersheba gateway of Palestine.
Recommended publications
  • The Forgotten Fronts the First World War Battlefield Guide: World War Battlefield First the the Forgotten Fronts Forgotten The
    Ed 1 Nov 2016 1 Nov Ed The First World War Battlefield Guide: Volume 2 The Forgotten Fronts The First Battlefield War World Guide: The Forgotten Fronts Creative Media Design ADR005472 Edition 1 November 2016 THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS | i The First World War Battlefield Guide: Volume 2 The British Army Campaign Guide to the Forgotten Fronts of the First World War 1st Edition November 2016 Acknowledgement The publisher wishes to acknowledge the assistance of the following organisations in providing text, images, multimedia links and sketch maps for this volume: Defence Geographic Centre, Imperial War Museum, Army Historical Branch, Air Historical Branch, Army Records Society,National Portrait Gallery, Tank Museum, National Army Museum, Royal Green Jackets Museum,Shepard Trust, Royal Australian Navy, Australian Defence, Royal Artillery Historical Trust, National Archive, Canadian War Museum, National Archives of Canada, The Times, RAF Museum, Wikimedia Commons, USAF, US Library of Congress. The Cover Images Front Cover: (1) Wounded soldier of the 10th Battalion, Black Watch being carried out of a communication trench on the ‘Birdcage’ Line near Salonika, February 1916 © IWM; (2) The advance through Palestine and the Battle of Megiddo: A sergeant directs orders whilst standing on one of the wooden saddles of the Camel Transport Corps © IWM (3) Soldiers of the Royal Army Service Corps outside a Field Ambulance Station. © IWM Inside Front Cover: Helles Memorial, Gallipoli © Barbara Taylor Back Cover: ‘Blood Swept Lands and Seas of Red’ at the Tower of London © Julia Gavin ii | THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS THE FORGOTTEN FRONTS | iii ISBN: 978-1-874346-46-3 First published in November 2016 by Creative Media Designs, Army Headquarters, Andover.
    [Show full text]
  • Gwres Y Gad: Llinell Amser | the Heat of Battle: Timeline
    Y Cadfrid 5FfBC, Northampton og Allenby General A 5RWF, Northampton llenby Ionawr 1916 January 1916 ‘Thumbs Up Every Time!’ Gwersyll 6ed FfBC Wadi Express 6th RWF camp Wadi Express Y Rhingyll Frederick Yn barod i ddadarfogi, Gwersyll Hadra, 1917 Khuweilfeh, Moab, 1918 Dyffryn Iorddonen, 1918 Barter, V.C., 25ain FfBC Alecsandria, Tach. 1918 Festubert, Ffrainc, 16 Gwersyll FfBC ger Gasa, Awst 1917 Jordan Valley Ypres (Ieper) 25th RWF 31.10 – 7.11.1917 , 1918 Ready for demob, Hadra Camp, Sinai Mai 1915 yn Wadi Natrun , Ionawr 1917 near Gaza, August 1917 Trydedd Brwydr Gasa – 6.11.1917 Alexandria, Nov. 1918 Sinai, y Cynghreiriad yn cipio Y Capten John Fox Sergeant-Major RWF camp at January 1917 5.3.1916 27.6.1917 Beersheba a Gasa. Y Russell, swyddog di Natrun Frederick Barter, V.C., Wa Iwmyn sir Ddinbych a sir Y Cadfridog Edmund Corporal John Collins Meddygol gyda 6ed FfBC, 26–30.12.1917 4.8.1914 Festubert, France, 16 Drefaldwyn yn hwylio am Allenby yn cyrraedd fel (25ain FfBC) yn cael yn cael Croes Victoria yn Amddiffyn Jerwsalem - 21.3 – 18.7.1918 19.9.1918 1920 28.6.1914 Yr Almaen yn ymosod ar May 1915 12.1915 yr Aifft. 24ain a 25ain prif swyddog newydd Croes Victoria yn ystod yr ymladd yn 9.12.1917 FfBC yn helpu trechu Ymosodiad Gwanwyn yr 29.4 – 3.5.1918 Brwydr Megiddo yn 11.11.1918 Cytundeb sèvres – y Dienyddiad yr Archddug Wlad Belg. Prydain yn 5ed, 6ed a 7fed FfBC yn FfBC yn ddiweddarach. 12.1916 26–27.3.1917 Byddin Ymgyrchol yr Aifft Beersheba khuweilfeh.
    [Show full text]
  • Bull Brothers – Robert and Henry
    EMU PARK SOLDIERS OF WORLD WAR I – THE GREAT WAR FROM EMU PARK and SHIRE OF LIVINGSTONE The Bull Brothers – Robert and Henry Sergeant Robert Charles Bull (Service No. 268) of the 15th Infantry Battalion and 1st Battalion Imperial Camel Brigade Robert was born on 17th May 1895 in a railway camp at Boolburra, the 9th child and 3rd son to Henry and Maria (née Ferguson) Bull, both immigrants from the United Kingdom. Henry from Whaplode, Lincolnshire, arrived in Rockhampton in 1879 at the age of 19. Maria was from Cookstown, Tyrone, North Ireland, arrived in Maryborough, also in 1879 and also aged 19. Robert spent his early years at Bajool before joining the Railway Service as a locomotive cleaner. He enlisted in the Australian Imperial Forces (AIF) on 16 September 1914 at Emerald where he gave his age as 21 years & 4 months, when in fact he was only 19 years & 4 months. Private Bull joined ‘B’ Company of the 15th Infantry Battalion, 4th Brigade which formed the Australian and New Zealand Division when they arrived in Egypt. The 15th Infantry Battalion consisted on average of 29 Officers and 1007 Other Ranks (OR’s) and was broken up into the following sub units: Section Platoon Company Battalion Rifle section:- Platoon Headquarters Company Battalion 10 OR’s (1 Officer & 4 OR’s) Headquarters (2 Headquarters (5 Officers & 57 Officers & 75 OR’s) Lewis Gun Section:- 10 3 Rifle Sections and OR’s) OR’s and 1 Lewis gun Section 4 Companies 1 Light Machine Gun 4 Platoons He sailed for Egypt aboard the HMAT (A40) Ceramic on 22nd December 1914.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    British Journal for Military History Volume 7, Issue 1, March 2021 What’s in a name? Identifying military engagements in Egypt and the Levant, 1915-1918 Roslyn Shepherd King Pike ISSN: 2057-0422 Date of Publication: 19 March 2021 Citation: Roslyn Shepherd King Pike, ‘What’s in a name? Identifying military engagements in Egypt and the Levant, 1915-1918’, British Journal for Military History, 7.1 (2021), pp. 87-112. www.bjmh.org.uk This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. The BJMH is produced with the support of IDENTIFYING MILITARY ENGAGEMENTS IN EGYPT & THE LEVANT 1915-1918 What’s in a name? Identifying military engagements in Egypt and the Levant, 1915- 1918 Roslyn Shepherd King Pike* Independent Scholar Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT This article examines the official names listed in the 'Egypt and Palestine' section of the 1922 report by the British Army’s Battles Nomenclature Committee and compares them with descriptions of military engagements in the Official History to establish if they clearly identify the events. The Committee’s application of their own definitions and guidelines during the process of naming these conflicts is evaluated together with examples of more recent usages in selected secondary sources. The articles concludes that the Committee’s failure to accurately identify the events of this campaign have had a negative impacted on subsequent historiography. Introduction While the perennial rose would still smell the same if called a lily, any discussion of military engagements relies on accurate and generally agreed on enduring names, so historians, veterans, and the wider community, can talk with some degree of confidence about particular events, and they can be meaningfully written into history.
    [Show full text]
  • Edwards H. Metcalf Library Collection on TE Lawrence
    Edwards H. Metcalf Library Collection on T.E. Lawrence: Scrapbooks Huntington Library Scrapbook 1 Page Contents 1 recto [Blank]. 1 verso Anal. 1. Newspaper clipping. North, John, 'Hejaz railway brings back memories of Lawrence', Northern Echo, June 14, 1965. Anal. 2. Newspaper clipping. 'Memories of T.E.', Yorkshire Post, May 18, 1965. Mss. Note from Beaumont 'Please accept these free with my compliments. T.W. Beaumont'. 2 recto Black-and-white photograph of Beaumont. 'Thomas W. Beaumont Served under T.E. Lawrence in Arabia as his Sgt. Vickers Gunner'. 2 verso Black-and-white photograph. Mss. 'To my friend Theodora Duncan with every good wish. T.W. Beaumont' Typed note. ' Parents of Peter O'Toole with T.W. Beaumont At the gala opening of the film "Lawrence of Arabia", at the Majestic Theatre in Leeds, Yorkshire, Sunday evening, Oct. 13, 1963'. 3 recto Anal. 3. Newspaper clipping. 'A Lawrence Talks About That Legend', Leeds, Yorkshire, April 10, 1964. Two black-and-white photographs. 'Mr. T. W. Beaumont meets Dr. M.R. Lawrence elder brother of T.E. Lawrence, at Leeds City Station, Yorkshire. April 10, 1964. 3 verso Newspaper cartoon. 'Boy! I'm glad they don't use US nowadays!' Anal. 4. 'The following small photographs were taken during WW-I on the Eastern Front by T.W. Beaumont & friends, and smuggled out of Arabia. Newspaper cartoon. 'Arms for the love of Allah!' 4 recto Black-and-white photograph. 'Siwa Oasis, 1915-17 Involved in the defense of Suez. Operations against the Senussi in Lybian Desert. Photographed by C.S.
    [Show full text]
  • G-2 Ouerations . Dur Ing Lfarch;^1917; MEMORANDUM FOR: the Director, 2D Yaar Class, Command and General Staff School, Port Leavenworth,Kansas
    i IT;?A^:R; Y - H I;V S^-T^^B^Y j . " ' G-2 ouerations . dur Ing lfarch;^1917; MEMORANDUM FOR: The Director, 2d Yaar Class, Command and General Staff School, Port Leavenworth,Kansas. SUBJECT: A study of the British G-2 Operations during March, 1917, Palestine Campaign, World War. !• PAPERS ACCO24PANYING. 1. A "bibliography for this study. 2. A Chart, marked No. 1, showing probable intelligence organization. 3. Two maps showing location of the more important command posts just prior to the first battle of GAZA, and the situation at 6:30 Pit, 26 March 1917. THE STUDY PRESENTED. — .Was the organization for intelligence at British GHQ, the headquarters of the HEastern PorcefV also the HDesert Column11, such as would properly meet conditions as existed in March 1917, prior to and during the first battle of GAZA. III. HISTORICAL PACTS RELATING TO THE STUDY. ~ 1. At the olose of 1916 a British force kn*h as the HEastern Column11, under command of Lieutenant General Sir Charles Dobell, but operating directly under the control of General Sir Archibald Murray at Cairo, advanoed from the Suez Canal and by the end of February had reached El Arish, with a portion of the foree forward of Rafah, and with the cavalry occupying Khan Yunis. (l) This force as organized, consisted of three divisions of infantry (52d, 53d, 54th), two divisions of mounted troops (Australian: and New Zealand), The Imperial Camel Corps, and ai'jciliaries such as airplanes, armored oars, some tanks, and heavy artillery. (2) Following their defeat at Romani, remmants of the original Turkish forces opposed the advance of the British by fighting rear guard actions and delaying the advance at successive organized positions until finally reaching a partially organized position at Shellal, which they commenced to improve* \Z) Arrangements were made to attack the Turkish position at Shellal but on the 5th of March, British airplanes reported the enemy withdrawing from that position.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard Duncan MM Basic Information [As Recorded on Local Memorial Or by CWGC] Name As Recorded on Local Memorial Or by CWGC: R
    131: Richard Duncan MM Basic Information [as recorded on local memorial or by CWGC] Name as recorded on local memorial or by CWGC: R. Duncan MM Rank: Private Battalion / Regiment: 1st / 4th Bn. Cheshire Regiment Service Number: 201007 Date of Death: 12 October 1919 Age at Death: ? Buried / Commemorated at: Neston Cemetery, Raby Road, Neston Additional information given by CWGC: None Richard Duncan was the (probably) sixth child of agricultural worker / labourer Thomas and Annie Duncan of Parkgate. Thomas Duncan married Annie Hobson at St John’s Church, Liverpool, in late 1874 and they had twelve children of whom ten survived. In 1881, before Richard was born, and in 1891, the family was living in Parkgate: 1881 census (extract) – Parkgate Thomas Duncan 26 agricultural labourer born Parkgate Annie 27 born Ripple, Warwicks. Thomas M.C. 7 born Liverpool Margaret A. 5 born Parkgate Ellen 2 born Parkgate Charles F. 9 months born Parkgate Richard Duncan, and older brother John, were both baptised at Neston Parish Church on 30 January 1885. 1891 census (extract) – Parkgate Thomas Duncan 38 labourer born Neston Annie 37 born Ripple, Warwicks. Thomas 17 labourer born Liverpool Margaret A. 15 born Neston Ellen 12 born Neston Charles F. 10 born Neston John 8 born Neston Richard 6 born Neston William 1 born Neston Cecilia M. 2 months born Neston Page | 1417 In 1901 the family was still in Parkgate and Richard, 19, was a domestic gardener: 1901 census (extract) – Parkgate Thomas Duncan 50 contractor’s carter, farm born Parkgate Annie 49 born Warwicks. John 21 farm labourer born Parkgate Richard 19 gardener, domestic born Parkgate William 13 born Parkgate Margery 10 born Parkgate Joseph 8 born Parkgate Edith 7 born Parkgate In 1901 Thomas M C Duncan, 28, was a platelayer lodging with fisherman Thomas and Clara Bushell in Parkgate.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplement to the London Gazette, 31 August, 1917. 9103
    SUPPLEMENT TO THE LONDON GAZETTE, 31 AUGUST, 1917. 9103 Officer. ' Temporary 2nd Lieutenant Thomas Edward Brevet Major (temporary Brigadier-General) Lawrence, Special List. Gilbert Falkingham Clayton, C.M.G. (Re- ! Temporary Captain Andrew Lowden, Army tired Pay), Reserve of Officers, late Royal ! Service Corps. Artillery. Temporary Captain M. S. MacDonnell, Special Brevet Lieutenant-Colonel (temporary Briga- \ List. • dier-General) Guy Payan Dawnay, M.V.O., I Temporary Lieutenant Robert Humphrey D.S.O., Reserve of Officers, late Coldstream . Marten, Army Service Corps. Guards. I 2nd Lieutenant (temporary Lieutenant) Wil- Lieutenant-Colonel (temporary Brigadier- liam Newton Phillips, Royal Engineers. General) Thomas Morton Stanhope Pitt, Kaimakam Leopold Victor Arnold Royle, Yeomanry. M.C., Egyptian Coastguards Administra- tion. Cavalier. Lieutenant Francis Hubert Seabrooke, Royal Engineers, Special Reserve. Major (temporary Lieutenant-Colonel) Regi- ( nald Edmund Maghlin Russell, D.S.O., Lieutenant (temporary Captain) Patrick Doug- Royal Engineers. las Stirling, Yeomanry. Temporary Captain Orlando Cyprian Williams, M.C., Special List. The Military Order of Savoy. Commander. Bronze Medal for Military Valour. Colonel (temporary Brigadier-General) Henry 1607 (now 206413) Company Serjeant-Major West Hodgson, C.V.O., C.B. George Edward Ansell, Royal West Surrey Cavalier. Regiment. 2578 (now 541622) Sapper Charles Bird, Royal Lieutenant-Colonel Hubert Malcolm Wilson, Engineers. Yeomanry. 940 (now 230300) 'Private Arthur Edward Bolt, Yeomanry. 612052 Trumpeter Richard Frederick Bowler, Order of the Crown of Italy. Royal Horse Artillery. 142067 Corporal (Motor Cyclist) James Cald- Grand Officer. well, Royal Engineers. Major-General Arthur Lyiiden Lynden-Bell, 320039 Private Arthur John Chamberlain, C.B., C.M.G. Suffolk Regiment. M2/116602 Private David Coid, Army Service Commander.
    [Show full text]
  • The Magazine
    Army Museum of Western Australia the magazine Artillery Barracks Phone: (08) 9430 2535 Artillery Barracks /armymuseumwa Burt Street,Street, Fremantle Fremantle, WA W 6160A 6160 Phone:Fax: (08)(08) 9430 9430 2535 2519 Email: [email protected] Open 10.30am 11 am - -4 3pm pm (last entry 1pm) Fax:Email: (08) [email protected] 2519 Web: www.armymuseumwa.com.au WednesdayWednesday - Sunday- Sunday Web:Springwww.armymuseumwa.com.au 2014 ISSUE 15, March 2017 An important TOURISM ACCREDITATION A security message from the Manager, MAJOR STEP FORWARD FOR Major Henry Fijolek ARMY MUSEUM ll volunteers by now would be Boer War Artillery Piece and the gun was renamed a 15 pounder.A aware of the Federal he Tourism Council of Western AustraliaThe Mkhas I recognisedcarriage recoil the was controlled byGovernment’ s heightened security by Robert Mitchell Tperformance of the Army Museum ofdrag-shoes. WA by awarding These wereit accreditation placed under thealert. This hasIns raised theIde Defence as a tourist business, a major achievementwheels, for the and museum. were connected by chains andForce Safe Base alert from Bravo to The Ordnance BL 15 pounder, (15 pounder cables to theThe wheel accreditation hubs and entitlesthe trail. Charlie. 7 cwt) was the British Army’s field gun As Artillery BarracksThe is a Defence in the Second Boer War (1899 - 1902). the museum to use the Prior to the Boer War, six Mk 1 versions site and the museum an Army sub- The gun was made at the Royal Arsenal council’s logo on its of the gun were delivered to New South unit of TheMagaz Australian ArmyIne History Woolwich in 1897.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronology of Evolution of the Camel by Frank J. Collazo December 13, 2010
    Chronology of Evolution of the Camel By Frank J. Collazo December 13, 2010 50-40 million years ago (Eocene): The oldest known camel is Protylopus, appeared 40-50 million years ago (Eocene) in North America. It was the size of a rabbit and lived in the forest. Later, camels spread to the savanna and increased their size. In Oligocene, 35 million years ago, Poebrotherium was the size of a roe deer but already resembled a camel. 45-38 million years ago: The ancestors of the modern camel lived in North America. The ancestors of the lamas and camels appear to have diverged sometime in the Eocene epoch. 24-12 million years ago: Various types of camels evolved. Stenomylus was a gazelle like camel. Alticamelus, which lived 10 to 2 million years ago, had a long neck similar to a giraffe. Procamelus, just 1.2 m tall (like a modern Lama) evolved in the Camelus genus (to which modern camels belong). Lamas migrated to South America, and all the camels in North America died out. Once in Asia, camels migrated through Eastern Europe, the Middle East and North Africa. 3-2 million years ago: Camelus passed from North America in Asia through Behringia 2-3 million years ago. 2 million years ago: The ancestors of lama and vicuña passed into the Andes coming from North America. The last camel surviving the cradle of the camel evolution, North America, was Camelops hesternus, which disappeared 12-10,000 years ago together with the whole mega fauna of North America (mammoths, mastodons, giant sloth and saber toothed cats).
    [Show full text]
  • You Can Download the Booklet Researching Your Relatives Military
    SEMINAR NOTES Organisers 3rd Auckland (Countess of Ranfurly’s Own) & Northland Battalion Group 3rd Auckland & Northland Regimental Association Auckland War Memorial Museum Passchendaele Society Returned & Services Association - Auckland Branch 2 INDEX Acknowledgement .………………………………………………….……..….. 2 The Boer War (1899 — 1902) ………………………………….………….. 3 NZ Army 1907 — 1911 Infantry Units …………………………………………………….……… 5 Mounted Rifles Units ……………………………….…….………… 6 World War I (The Great War) ………………………….…….…………… 7 1 NZEF Samoa 1914 — 1918 Gallipoli 1915 Belgium & France 1916 — 1918 Mounted Rifles 1914 — 1919 World War II ………………………………………………………………………... 8 2 NZEF (2 (NZ) Division) Greece and Crete 1940 North Africa 1940 — 1943 Italy 1943 — 1945 2 NZEF (IP) (3 (NZ) Division) The Pacific 1940 — 1944………………….…………….. 10 Jargon and Abbreviations …..……………………….…………….. 11 Other Data Sources …………………………………………………….……… 12 Medals Description …………………………………………….…………….... 14 Illustrations ………………………………………….…………………… 16 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The organizers of these seminars say thanks, on behalf of all who use this Data, to our Financial Donors and the Printer who made this booklet possible. 3 Boer War Contingents 1899 — 1902 Contingent Strength Units Departed Date Ship 1st 215 1st Mounted Rifles Wellington 21/10/99 SS Waiwera 1 and 2 Company 2nd 266 Wellington 20/01/00 SS Waiwera Hotchkiss Machine Gun Canterbury Company 3rd 262 Hawkes Bay Wanganui Lyttleton 17/02/00 SS Knight Templar Taranaki & Manawatu Company 9 and 10 Company Port Chalmers 25/03/00 SS Gymeric 4th 462 7 and 8
    [Show full text]
  • Monash and Chauvel
    Two Great Australians who helped bring WW1 to an end - Monash and Chauvel 1918 finally saw the end of four long years of War in Europe and the Middle East. It had cost hundreds of thousands of lives including 60,000 Australians. Two of the chief army generals that helped bring about the final outcome were Sir John Monash and Sir Harry Chauvel – both Australians. Monash’s brilliant strategies brought the final victory on the Western Front and Chauvel led five brigades of Light Horse troops to carry out Allenby’s breakthrough plan and end the Ottoman Empire in the Middle East. General Sir John Monash – GCMG, KCB Monash was born on June 27, 1865 in West Melbourne. His father had migrated from Prussia in 1854. The family was Jewish and had changed the spelling of their name from Monasch to Monash. After his father’s business suffered great loss, the family moved to Jerilderie in New South Wales. John attended school there and displayed a high intellect and an extraordinary talent for mathematics. His family returned to Melbourne where he attended Scotch College in Glenferrie and became equal dux of the school, excelling in mathematics, before going on to study engineering, arts and law at Melbourne University. He was not a good student in his first year, being distracted by the things of the world, bored in lectures and he preferred to study at the State Library himself and attend the theatre. He failed his first year but then put his mind to it and flew through with honours.
    [Show full text]