City Funds & Capital Projects (Vol 2).Book

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

City Funds & Capital Projects (Vol 2).Book

Adopted Budget City of Portland, Oregon Fiscal Year 2016-17 Volume Two City Funds and Capital Projects Mayor Charlie Hales Commissioner Nick Fish Commissioner Amanda Fritz Commissioner Steve Novick Commissioner Dan Saltzman Auditor Mary Hull Caballero This document is printed on 100% post- consumer waste recycled paper. Table of Contents User's Guide. 1 City Funds . 5 General Fund. 5 General Reserve Fund . 6 Grants Fund. 7 Public Safety Service Area Funds . 9 BFRES Facilities GO Bond Construction Fund . 9 Emergency Communication Fund . 10 Fire & Police Disability & Retirement Fund . 12 Fire & Police Disability & Retirement Res Fund. 14 Fire & Police Supplemental Retirement Res Fund . 15 Police Special Revenue Fund . 16 Public Safety GO Bond Fund. 18 Parks, Recreation, & Culture Service Area Funds . 19 Golf Fund. 19 Golf Revenue Bond Redemption Fund . 20 Parks Capital Improvement Program Fund . 21 Parks Endowment Fund . 23 Parks Local Option Levy Fund. 24 Portland International Raceway Fund . 25 Portland Parks Memorial Fund . 27 Spectator Venues & Visitor Activities Fund . 28 Public Utilities Service Area Funds . 33 Environmental Remediation Fund . 33 Hydroelectric Power Bond Redemption Fund . 35 Hydroelectric Power Operating Fund. 37 Hydroelectric Power Renewal Replacement Fund . 39 Sewer System Construction Fund . 40 Sewer System Debt Redemption Fund . 42 Sewer System Operating Fund . 53 Sewer System Rate Stabilization Fund . 55 Solid Waste Management Fund . 56 Water Bond Sinking Fund . 57 Water Construction Fund. 64 Water Fund . 65 Community Development Service Area Funds. 67 42nd Avenue NPI Debt Service Fund . 67 82nd Ave/Division NPI Debt Service Fund . 68 Airport Way Debt Service Fund . 69 Arts Education & Access Fund . 71 Assessment Collection Fund . 72 City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2016-17 Adopted Budget i Table of Contents Bancroft Bond Interest and Sinking Fund. 73 Central Eastside Ind. District Debt Service Fund . 77 Children's Investment Fund . 80 Community Development Block Grant Fund . 81 Community Solar Fund. 83 Convention and Tourism Fund. 84 Convention Center Area Debt Service Fund . 85 Cully Blvd. NPI Debt Service Fund. 87 Development Services Fund . 88 Division-Midway NPI Debt Service Fund . 89 Education URA Debt Service Fund . 90 Gateway URA Debt Redemption Fund . ..

256

Copy Link

Recommended publications

District Background
DRAFT SOUTHEAST LIAISON DISTRICT PROFILE DRAFT Introduction In 2004 the Bureau of Planning launched the District Liaison Program which assigns a City Planner to each of Portland’s designated liaison districts. Each planner acts as the Bureau’s primary contact between community residents, nonprofit groups and other government agencies on planning and development matters within their assigned district. As part of this program, District Profiles were compiled to provide a survey of the existing conditions, issues and neighborhood/community plans within each of the liaison districts. The Profiles will form a base of information for communities to make informed decisions about future development. This report is also intended to serve as a tool for planners and decision-makers to monitor the implementation of existing plans and facilitate future planning. The Profiles will also contribute to the ongoing dialogue and exchange of information between the Bureau of Planning, the community, and other City Bureaus regarding district planning issues and priorities. PLEASE NOTE: The content of this document remains a work-in-progress of the Bureau of Planning’s District Liaison Program. Feedback is appreciated. Area Description Boundaries The Southeast District lies just east of downtown covering roughly 17,600 acres. The District is bordered by the Willamette River to the west, the Banfield Freeway (I-84) to the north, SE 82nd and I- 205 to the east, and Clackamas County to the south. Bureau of Planning - 08/03/05 Southeast District Page 1 Profile Demographic Data Population Southeast Portland experienced modest population growth (3.1%) compared to the City as a whole (8.7%).
[Show full text]
PP&R's FY 2021-22 Requested Budget
Requested Budget FY 2021-22 Portland Parks & Recreation PP&R Staff FY 2021-22 Requested Budget Maximo Behrens, Recreation Services Manager Tonya Booker, Land Stewardship Manager Carmen Rubio, Commissioner-in-charge Jenn Cairo, Urban Forestry Manager Tim Collier, Public Information Manager Adena Long, Director Margaret Evans, Workforce Development Manager Todd Lofgren, Deputy Director Vicente Harrison, Security and Emergency Manager Lauren McGuire, Assets and Development Manager Claudio Campuzano, Manager Kenya Williams, Equity and Inclusion Manager Finance, Property, & Technology Department Kerry Anderson Andre Ashley Don Athey Darryl Brooks Budget Advisory Committee Tamara Burkovskaia Krystin Castro Board Members Riley Clark-Long Paul Agrimis Mara Cogswell Mike Elliott Dale Cook Jenny Glass Terri Davis Juan Piantino Leah Espinoza Paddy Tillett Rachel Felice Bonnie Gee Yosick Joan Hallquist Erin Zollenkopf Erik Harrison Britta Herwig Labor Partners Brett Horner Sadie Atwell, Laborers Local 483 Don Joughin Luis Flores, PCL Brian Landoe Yoko Silk, PTE-17 Robin Laughlin Sara Mayhew-Jenkins Community Representatives Todd Melton Pauline Miranda Jeremy Robbins, Portland Accessibility Advisory Council Soo Pak Andre Middleton, Friends of Noise Dylan Paul Chris Rempel, Native American Community Advisory Council Nancy Roth JR Lilly, East Portland Action Plan Victor Sanders Joe McFerrin, Portland Opportunities Industrialization Center Jamie Sandness Brian Flores Garcia, Youth Durelle Singleton Sabrina Wilson, Rosewood Initiative Chris Silkie Jenny
[Show full text]
Download the PDX Celebrate It’S Two Year Anniversary on June 7 at 6:30 Pm
Our Where’s Growing Early 28th Ave. Q Revolution Newspaper Year Page 14 Page 8 Page 3 JUNE SOUTHEAST EXAMINER 2017 southeastexaminer.com “Your Neighborhood News Source” Vol 28 No 6 Portland, OR Infill on Steroids Gains State Traction: Riles Residents BY MIDGE PIERCE and old. But opponents say the Oregon A bill known as a “Build Baby Build” Home Builders Association (OHBA) legislative bill under the idea of addressing and others twisted it into a bill that over- emergency housing statewide is fueling rides local zoning and undermines city what critics call a widespread assault controls. The bill would allow building to on Oregon cities’ self-determination maximum density and heights potentially and livability. Adding insult, the bill is disregarding critical local planning tools barreling through the state legislature like discretionary design reviews. without adequate public hearing. As outrage mounted last month at House Bill 2007 would essentially an informational meeting in Salem, House Overview of the proposed cascading soaking pools between reservoirs 5 and 6. eliminate single family residential Speaker Tina Kotek slammed opponents as Designed by Jennifer Moran neighborhoods by making multi-plex infill racist NIMBYS. Arriving late to advocate housing mandatory across the state. The for the “high-yield” housing bill she Mt. Tabor Park Thermal Baths bill would permit duplexes and ADUs sponsored, she condemned “race-based everywhere in cities and towns of at least housing policies” and said opposition is An Idea for Preserving the Reservoirs, Creating 2500 residents. “grounded in Nimbyism” by well-heeled Energy, and Raising Revenue Critics call it a stealth bill that is residents using discriminatory practices Infill inflation modeled after Portland’s that restrict others from building wealth BY AMY PETERSON PSU SCHOOL OF ARCHI- in 2006, the city cannot use the open controversial Residential Infill Project and power.
[Show full text]
2015 DRAFT Park SDC Capital Plan 150412.Xlsx
2015 PARK SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE 20‐YEAR CAPITAL PLAN (SUMMARY) April 2015 As required by ORS 223.309 Portland Parks and Recreation maintains a list of capacity increasing projects intended to TYPES OF PROJECTS THAT INCREASE CAPACITY: address the need created by growth. These projects are eligible to be funding with Park SDC revenue . The total value of Land acquisition projects summarized below exceeds the potential revenue of $552 million estimated by the 2015 Park SDC Methodology and Develop new parks on new land the funding from non-SDC revenue targeted for growth projects. Expand existing recreation facilities, trails, play areas, picnic areas, etc The project list and capital plan is a "living" document that, per ORS 223.309 (2), maybe modified at anytime. It should be Increase playability, durability and life of facilities noted that potential modifications to the project list will not impact the fee since the fee is not based on the project list, but Develop and improve parks to withstand more intense and extended use rather the level of service established by the adopted Park SDC Methodology. Construct new or expand existing community centers, aquatic facilities, and maintenance facilities Increase capacity of existing community centers, aquatic facilities, and maintenance facilities ELIGIBLE PROJECTS POTENTIAL REVENUE TOTAL PARK SDC ELIGIBLE CAPACITY INCREASING PROJECTS 20‐year Total SDC REVENUE CATEGORY SDC Funds Other Revenue Total 2015‐35 TOTAL Park SDC Eligible City‐Wide Capacity Increasing Projects 566,640,621 City‐Wide
[Show full text]
ORDINANCE NO. 187150 As Amended
ORDINANCE NO. 187150 As Amended Accept Park System Development Charge Methodology Update Report for implementation, and amend the applicable sections of City Code (Ordinance; amend Code Chapter 17.13) The City of Portland ordains: Section 1. The Council finds: 1. Ordinance No. 172614, passed by the Council on August 19, 1998 authorized establishment of a Parks and Recreation System Development Charge(SDC) and created a new City Code Chapter 17.13. 2. In October 1998 the City established a Parks SDC program. City Code required that the program be updated every two years to ensure that program goals were being met. An update was implemented on July 1, 2005 pursuant to Ordinance No. 179008, as amended. The required update reviewed the Parks SDC Program to determine that sufficient money will be available to fund capacity-increasing facilities identified by the Parks SDC-CIP; to determine whether the adopted and indexed SDC rate has kept pace with inflation; to determine whether the Parks SDC-CIP should be modified; and to ensure that SDC receipts will not over-fund such facilities. 3. Ordinance No 175774, passed by the Council on July 12, 2001 adopted The Parks 2020 Vision. This report highlighted significant challenges confronting the City in regards to shoring up our ailing park facilities, eliminating inequity in underserved neighborhoods, and providing a stable source of funding to address not just our existing shortfalls, but to also meet the needs created by new development. The Park SDC is the most significant revenue opportunity available to Parks to address growth. It is imperative that this opportunity is maximized to recover reasonable costs from new development.
[Show full text]
Portland Tribune Closer to Home
Ducks primed for strong fi nish EDITION — SEE SPORTS, B1 Oregon leaving lone loss well behind GREATER PORTLAND PortlandT U E S D A Y , N O V E M B E R 4 , 2 0 1 4 • T W IC E C H O S E N T H E N A T IO N ’S B E S T N O N D A IL Y P ATribune P E R • P O R T L A N D T R IB U N E .C O M • P U B L IS H E D T U E S D A Y A N D T HURSDAY Sites for Court new jobs wrestles face more with cap hurdles on liability Study says luring Legal fi ght swirls big employers around $12 million depends on local verdict in OHSU case By PETER W ONG land-use action The Tribune By JIM REDDEN The Oregon Supreme Court The Tribune will hear arguments Thurs- day, Nov. 6, on whether $3 mil- On paper, the Portland area lion in damages is “substan- has enough vacant industrial tial” enough for the family of land to meet employers’ a boy whose liver operation at needs for the next 20 years. Oregon Health & Science Uni- In reality, maybe not. More versity went awry in 2009. than half the available sites need A jury in Multnomah County government help to develop, in- Circuit Court returned a $12 mil- cluding assembling adjacent BIG DREAMS, lion verdict last year against lots, annexations into cities, in- OHSU and surgeon Dr.
[Show full text]
Reserve a Park for Your Picnic
Reserve a Park for Your Picnic Making reservations, policies, insurance, and more Prices and policies within are valid for permits booked from February 18 - June 30, 2020. GENERAL INFORMATION Picnic permits allow you to bring in the following items Portland Parks & Recreation (PP&R) has 200+ parks and for your event - gardens, and many of these locations have individual • 1-2 tables and/or 1-2 pop-up canopies (no larger picnic tables available for use on a first-come, first-served than 10’x10’, no stakes are allowed in a park) basis. When there is a grouping of three or more tables, • a residential-style barbecue grill they are often reservable. To guarantee your picnic • small speakers heard only within immediate date and location, it is recommended that you make a picnic area picnic reservation in advance. For your convenience, this Special Use Permits are required when - brochure lists picnic sites and fees. Parks not included in • there is BYOB beer and wine present and more than 49 this brochure may be reserved under a Special Use Permit. people of any age • you’d like to provide alcohol (hosted, catered, kegs, etc.) Picnic permits cover the following type of events - • you’d like to bring items not included above (i.e. • A gathering of family/friends or company/ volleyball nets, inflatables/bounce house, additional organization tables or canopies) • A single reserved picnic facility without exceeding • you’d like to drive a vehicle on the sidewalk to pick up or the stated site capacity drop off items for your event • When event attendance is free.
[Show full text]
Within Your Reach a Publication of the Johnson Creek Watershed Council
Winter 2011 Volume XIX, No. 1 Within Your Reach A publication of the Johnson Creek Watershed Council reach: a) a portion of a stream or river b) an extent, esp. of knowledge or comprehension Invasives, Trash and Donuts By JoAnn Herrigel, Community Services Director, City of Milwaukie I have attended the Johnson Creek Water- shed Council’s Watershed Wide Event (WWE) for almost ten years in a row. When I began attending this event, my daughter was 3 years old and she and I spent most of our time eat- ing donuts and wandering about talking to people. Thankfully, the donuts were plentiful (and yummy) and there were lots of fun people to chat with! People of all ages, vocations and Spawning Salmon Return interests attend these events and I always meet someone with an interesting story to tell. One to Upper Johnson Creek year I brought my two friends who were visit- By Matt Clark, Executive Director, JCWC ing from New York state and not only did they have a great time, but they entertained their In late 2010, three adult Coho Salmon carcasses and one live adult Coho were seen in work teammates with stories of their east coast mainstem Johnson Creek near the eastern border of Gresham, about 15 miles from the mouth lives and won the prize for having travelled the of Johnson Creek—much farther upstream than spawning Coho have been documented in farthest for a JCWC Watershed Wide Event! recent years. Historically, Coho were abundant throughout the Johnson Creek Watershed, but A few years in a row, I cajoled the members for the last twenty years or more, spawning Coho have only been documented in small numbers of the Milwaukie Riverfront Board, which I in lower Johnson Creek and Crystal Springs Creek.
[Show full text]
Natural Areas Restoration Plan October 2010
Natural Areas Restoration Plan October 2010 Update: March 2015 Natural Areas Restoration Plan Update March 18, 2015 Portland Parks & Recreation (PP&R) completed the first system wide Natural Areas Restoration Plan (plan) in October 2010. The plan was completed as a requirement for Salmon Safe certification. It established restoration goals and strategies, management priorities and implementation actions. It is currently used to set restoration priorities (staff effort and funding) for natural areas. The plan stated that there would be a review and update every 3-5 years. The 2014 update modified the functional methodology and revised the weighting to remove the emphasis on salmonids and their habitat needs. The 2014 Natural Area Management Priority Matrix changes are based on the updated natural resource function methodology and ecological health determined by the best professional judgment of the ecologist managing the site. The goals, strategies and implementation actions remain the same. This updates also includes the natural area properties purchased since 2010. Methodology Update The methodology update evaluated additional functions and created a new weighting system. The original plan weighted functions associated with salmon habitat the highest while this update does not. Some of the updated functions were assigned weighted scores on a scale of 3 (high) to 1 (low) similar to the scoring used in the 2010 plan. A natural area was also given points for Terrestrial Ecology Enhancement Strategy (TEES) special status habitats and City of Portland At-Risk Species. The functions included are: (see attached memo for details): Streams: Perennial, non-perennial and within 100 feet of the natural area.
[Show full text]
Parks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area
Parks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area • Portland Parks and Recreation Percent of City Budget Parks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area 2.8% Remaining City Budget 97.2% Percent of Service Area Budget Portland Parks and Recreation 100.0% Service Area Overview Revised Adopted Change from Percent Requirements FY 2011-12 FY 2012-13 Prior Year Change Operating 93,163,727 78,833,171 (14,330,556) (15.38) Capital 21,408,689 21,595,385 186,696 0.87 Total Requirements 114,572,416 100,428,556 (14,143,860) (12.34) Authorized Positions 445.13 411.13 (34.00) (7.64) City of Portland, Oregon – FY 2012-13 Adopted Budget 217 Parks, Recreation, and Culture Service Area Service Area Highlights Description The Parks, Recreation, and Culture service area includes services for Portland Parks & Recreation, the Golf program, Portland International Raceway (PIR), and the Parks Capital Improvement Program Fund. Major Themes Portland Parks & The FY 2012-13 Adopted Budget for Parks includes a $2.9 million reduction in Recreation Operating ongoing General Fund discretionary resources, of which $981,829 is attributable to Budget support, management, and administrative functions affecting 10.0 FTE. In addition, the bureau has been allocated $370,000 of one-time General Fund resources to continue three Teen Programming positions and the summer lunch program. Parks Construction Parks' FY 2012-13 CIP budget is $21.6 million. Of this amount, $1.2 million is and Maintenance supported by the City's General Fund with remaining funding derived from grants, Program system development charges, the Portland Development Commission, Metro, and other sources.
[Show full text]
2016 Park System Development Charge 20-Year Capital Plan (Summary)
187770 Exhibit A 2016 PARK SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGE 20-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN (SUMMARY) As required by ORS 223.309 Portland Parks and Recreation maintains a list of capacity increasing projects intended to address the need created by growth. These projects are eligible to be funded with Park SDC revenue. The total value of projects summarized below exceeds the potential revenue of $552 million estimated by the 2015 Park SDC Methodology and the funding from non-SDC revenue targeted for growth projects. The project list and capital plan is a "living" document that, per ORS 223.309 (2), may be modified at any time. Changes to this list will not affect the SDC rates, unless the Council holds a public hearing and authorizes the changes, as provided in ORS 223.309(2). TYPES OF PROJECTS THAT INCREASE CAPACITY: Land acquisition Develop new parks on new land Expand existing recreation facilities, trails, play areas, picnic areas, etc Increase playability, durability and life of facilities Natural area restoration Develop and improve parks to withstand more intense and extended use Construct new or expand existing community centers, aquatic facilities, and maintenance facilities Increase capacity of existing community centers, aquatic facilities, and maintenance facilities SDC Zone Program Site Project Name % Growth Years 1 - 5 Years 6 - 10 Years 11 -10 Total 20 Years Total * Growth % Central City Acquisitions Central City Unidentified Central City Acquisitions 100% $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 $ 5,000,000 Central City Acquisition Placeholder Downtown 100%
[Show full text]
Within Your Reach a Publication of the Johnson Creek Watershed Council
Winter 2009 Volume XVII, No. 1 Within Your Reach A publication of the Johnson Creek Watershed Council reach: a) a portion of a stream or river b) an extent, esp. of knowledge or comprehension Cultural Perspectives of the Watershed: The first in a multi-part series exploring diverse cultural perspectives of Johnson Creek Watershed Native Oregonian Perspective By Charles F. Sams III, Director Tribal and Native Lands Program, Trust for Public Land In 1491, the largest inhabited city in Eu- rope was London, England with a popula- tion of nearly 90,000 people. In that same Oregon Hunters Association members gather at their stewardship site at Powell Butte. year, the area around present day Portland was populated by between 30,000 to 50,000 Natives, mostly Chinook, Clackamas, North- Watershed Wide Event Depends ern Molalla, Tualatin, Siletz, and Kalapuya tribal peoples. For over 10,000 years, Native on Committed Partners Like OHA Americans lived throughout the By Rick Williams, Vice President, Oregon Hunters Association Willamette Valley. When you see volunteers clad in hunter the first national parks, started the wildlife It is, therefore, no orange clothing clearing invasive vegetation preserve system, and developed our first con- coincidence that or replanting native species during the John- servation programs. These efforts, followed the City of Port- son Creek Watershed Wide Event, you might by the actions of other great conservation- land, which lies at wonder, “Who are these people and why are ists like Aldo Leopold, led to our current the intersection of they here?” The answer is that all of those system of national wildlife management and the Willamette and volunteers are hunters and they belong to an the recovery of our wildlife resources.
[Show full text]