DOCSLIB.ORG

Rt Hon Frank Field MP Chair Work and Pensions Select Committee 14 Tothill Street London SW1H 9NB

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rt Hon Frank Field MP Chair Work and Pensions Select Committee 14 Tothill Street London SW1H 9NB Rt Hon Frank Field MP Chair Work and Pensions Select Committee 14 Tothill Street London SW1H 9NB 15 May 2018 Dear Mr Field Thank you for your letter dated 14 May 2018 in relation to questions posed around the number of assessments carried out by Independent Assessment Services (IAS) Health Professionals (HPs) and incentives. You may recall during the Minister for Disabled People’s evidence session in front of your Committee on 20 December 2017, the topic of the number of assessments carried out by IAS HPs and incentives was raised by Heidi Allen MP following a constituent providing detail to her during the session. We were asked by DWP to confirm our position on these two areas back to the Committee which my colleague, David Haley did in writing via email to Mrs Allen on 22 December 2017. Mrs Allen replied saying she would share our response with your Committee Clerk. A copy of the email is attached with this letter. In response to your questions posed I can provide the following detail: 1. Confirm whether the above letter is a) genuine and b) reflective of current policy I can confirm this is a genuine letter. It related to a time-limited incentive plan put in place in Spring last year to handle a period of high PIP referral volumes and ensure PIP claimants were assessed within a reasonable time frame. To support this objective, the scheme was put in place to encourage the take-up of overtime – for example, asking staff to give more time so they could complete a fifth assessment. It is not something we currently offer to staff and we have no plans to put a similar scheme in place in the future. 2. Do you offer, or have you ever offered, financial incentives for assessors to complete more assessments—for example to counter peak demands in applications? The number of PIP referrals that we receive from DWP can fluctuate. When we have more cases to assess than anticipated and to help minimise the time it takes for claimants to receive their assessment, we will ask our HPs if they are able to work additional hours to help complete more cases and in the past we have compensated them for doing so. At certain points where demand was particularly high, we have put in place schemes that remunerate over and above normal overtime rates, to facilitate take-up. We are, however, always clear that quality cannot be compromised and that satisfying all assessment criteria fully in each and every assessment is the number one priority. For example, wider communications on the Spring 2017 initiative made clear that the quality of assessments completed had to be maintained, any HP undergoing an improvement plan for their quality would not be eligible to take part and HP quality was monitored closely to ensure the quality standards were met. 3. Outline the steps taken to ensure assessors do not feel rushed to complete assessments. The volume of cases that HPs can complete in a day will vary based upon their longevity and level of experience. Typically, an HP will carry out around four consultations per day in an assessment centre or three when doing home consultations. However, HPs are not set targets for the numbers of assessment they carry out each day. We have very specific policies and guidance in place to ensure that assessments meet the standards we expect including: We are clear that assessments must take as long as is appropriate for each individual claimant and instruct staff working with us to act accordingly. Our scheduling policy is designed (and constantly monitored) to ensure that cases are sufficiently spread throughout the working day to ensure that there are no build-ups of cases within an assessment centre in a day. Our managers are instructed to not put any pressure on HPs to rush assessments but to always complete them to the highest quality. To ensure accuracy HPs should always complete their report immediately after the assessment and before seeing the next claimant, unless there are exceptional circumstances to prevent this (e.g. a power outage). We have a comprehensive system of management information and clinical audit that allows us to monitor the quality of assessments and drives improvement activity. Although the length of individual assessments will vary considerably depending upon the circumstances of the case, the average assessment duration in an assessment centre has remained consistent at around 90 mins which includes the write up time of the assessment. Where individuals vary from the norms here, managers and clinical support leads will investigate the reasons for this and will take remedial action if necessary – for example, if a HP was taking insufficient time to probe a specific area of the assessment. We also have a programme of ongoing improvements to enhance the PIP claimant experience and the service we provide. Working with DWP colleagues we are making progress on taking forward Paul Gray’s Independent Review recommendations alongside the regular feedback we receive from claimants and their companions. Meanwhile we are working with the Department to drive forwards the further improvements to the services we offer as recommended by the Committee in your recent report. I hope that this response is reassuring. The quality of assessments and claimant experience are of the highest priority for IAS. Although we do naturally need to ensure that we can handle the volume of cases sent to us by DWP, to ensure that claimant waiting times are minimised, this must never be at the expense of the quality of the assessment or the experience of the claimant being assessed. I would be very happy to meet with you to discuss any further questions you might have, should you find this useful. Yours sincerely Michael Hewson Client Executive Independent Assessment Services Email Correspondence between David Haley, IAS and Heidi Allen, MP From: "ALLEN, Heidi" <[email protected]> Date: 2 January 2018 at 12:40:51 GMT To: "Haley, David" <[email protected]> Cc: "MCENHILL, Libby" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Work and Pensions Select Committee 20 Dec follow up Dear David, I appreciate you taking the time in writing to me to clarify ATOS's policy. I've copied in Libby from our committee who will be pulling together our final report and recommendations. Best wishes, Heidi Allen Member of Parliament for South Cambridgeshire Web: www.heidisouthcambs.co.uk Twitter: @heidiallen75 Constituency office: 82A High Street, Sawston, CB22 3HJ Tel: 01223 830037 Westminster office: House of Commons, London, SW1A 0AA Tel: 0207 219 5091 From: Haley, David <[email protected]> Sent: 22 December 2017 13:43 To: ALLEN, Heidi Subject: Work and Pensions Select Committee 20 Dec follow up Dear Heidi Further to discussions in the Work and Pensions Select Committee evidence session on 20 December, I wanted to contact you directly to re-assure you that health professionals (HPs) employed by Independent Assessment Services (IAS) cannot and do not rush cases in order to complete a greater number of assessments. Caseloads for HPs differ based on longevity and level of experience. Typically, an HP will carry out around four consultations per day in a Centre or three doing home consultations. However, HPs are not set targets for the numbers of assessment they carry out each day. Cont./ We are clear that assessments must take as long as is appropriate for each individual claimant, and instruct HPs working with us to act accordingly. The current average assessment duration has remained consistent at around 90 mins which includes the write up time of the assessment, and we have always trained people to write up their report immediately after the consultation unless there are exceptional circumstances to prevent this (e.g. power outage). As you will appreciate, in order for us to deliver the best possible service to claimants, we need to understand how many PIP cases HPs are likely to be able to see so that we can plan how many claimants we can invite for assessments into our centres, and can schedule for home consultations. At times, when we have more cases to assess and to help minimise the time it takes for claimants to receive their assessment, we will ask HPs if they are able to work additional hours to help complete more cases and we compensate them for doing so. However, we are clear that quality cannot be compromised and that satisfying all assessment criteria fully in each and every assessment is the number one priority. HP quality is monitored closely to ensure this is met. We agree all the principles of how we operate our scheduling of claimants’ appointments with DWP. We hope the additional information above is helpful to you in providing some further context and clarification around how IAS goes about delivering PIP assessments and providing the best possible service for claimants. Kind regards David Haley Chief Executive Independent Assessment Services M +44 (0)7733 314801 4 Triton Square Regent's Place London NW1 3HG [email protected] .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • Victims of Modern Slavery
    House of Commons Work and Pensions Committee Victims of modern slavery Twelfth Report of Session 2016–17 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 26 April 2017 HC 803 Published on 30 April 2017 by authority of the House of Commons Work and Pensions Committee The Work and Pensions Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Office of the Department for Work and Pensions and its associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon Frank Field MP (Labour, Birkenhead) (Chair) Heidi Allen MP (Conservative, South Cambridgeshire) Mhairi Black MP (Scottish National Party, Paisley and Renfrewshire South) Ms Karen Buck MP (Labour, Westminster North) James Cartlidge MP (Conservative, South Suffolk) Neil Coyle MP (Labour, Bermondsey and Old Southwark) Richard Graham MP (Conservative, Gloucester) Luke Hall MP (Conservative, Thornbury and Yate) Steve McCabe MP (Labour, Birmingham, Selly Oak) Craig Mackinlay MP (Conservative, South Thanet) Royston Smith MP (Conservative, Southampton, Itchen) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication Committee reports are published on the publications page of the Committee’s website and in print by Order of the House. Evidence relating to this report is published on the inquiry page of the Committee’s website. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are Adam Mellows-Facer (Clerk), Margaret McKinnon (Second Clerk), Ian Hart (Committee Specialist), Libby McEnhill (Committee Specialist), Rod McInnes (Committee Specialist), Alison Pickard (Senior Committee Assistant), Michelle Garratty (Committee Assistant), and Jessica Bridges-Palmer (Media Officer).
    [Show full text]
  • Type Document Title Here
    The other leadership race that really matters Blog post by Practice Lead Tom King, 13 June 2019 There is only one cast-iron certainty in British politics. That is that whoever replaces Theresa May in Downing Street this summer will be faced with the same set of problems. Of course, the identity of the prime minister matters. But it is not likely to change the questions facing MPs of all parties come the autumn. Largely unnoticed, there is another leadership contest underway that might have a much more important effect. The Liberal Democrats had an exceptional spring, roaring back into the public eye with a strong local election performance before comfortably pushing Labour into third place at the European Parliament elections. Ironically, the Lib Dems probably have a smaller party to thank for this turnaround. The party’s ‘Libby’ bird logo had been thought more of a dead duck, its brand too toxic after the coalition years to be restored. Under the directionless leadership of Vince Cable – who seemed to behave more like an analyst than a politician – there seemed little hope. And it was because of this that Change UK was born. The hodgepodge of frustrated Conservative and Labour Remainers, informally led by Chuka Umunna, Heidi Allen and Anna Soubry, chose to plough their own furrow rather than join the largest Remain-supporting UK party. It made sense: they simply looked over at the Lib Dems and thought, ‘we can do better than that’. The now divided Change UK’s biggest legacy may turn out to be to have forced the Lib Dems into action.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inner Workings of British Political Parties the Interaction of Organisational Structures and Their Impact on Political Behaviours
    REPORT The Inner Workings of British Political Parties The Interaction of Organisational Structures and their Impact on Political Behaviours Ben Westerman About the Author Ben Westerman is a Research Fellow at the Constitution Society specialising in the internal anthropology of political parties. He also works as an adviser on the implications of Brexit for a number of large organisations and policy makers across sectors. He has previously worked for the Labour Party, on the Remain campaign and in Parliament. He holds degrees from Bristol University and King’s College, London. The Inner Workings of British Political Parties: The Interaction of Organisational Structures and their Impact on Political Behaviours Introduction Since June 2016, British politics has entered isn’t working’,3 ‘Bollocks to Brexit’,4 or ‘New Labour into an unprecedented period of volatility and New Danger’5 to get a sense of the tribalism this fragmentation as the decision to leave the European system has engendered. Moreover, for almost Union has ushered in a fundamental realignment a century, this antiquated system has enforced of the UK’s major political groupings. With the the domination of the Conservative and Labour nation bracing itself for its fourth major electoral Parties. Ninety-five years since Ramsay MacDonald event in five years, it remains to be seen how and to became the first Labour Prime Minister, no other what degree this realignment will take place under party has successfully formed a government the highly specific conditions of a majoritarian (national governments notwithstanding), and every electoral system. The general election of winter government since Attlee’s 1945 administration has 2019 may well come to be seen as a definitive point been formed by either the Conservative or Labour in British political history.
    [Show full text]
  • Dissent and Rebellion in the House of Commons: a Social Network Analysis of Brexit-Related Divisions in the 57Th Parliament
    Dissent and Rebellion in the House of Commons: A Social Network Analysis of Brexit-Related Divisions in the 57th Parliament Carla Intal1 and Taha Yasseri1;2;3;4∗ 1Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK 2School of Sociology, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland 3Geary Institute for Public Policy, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland 4Alan Turing Institute, London, UK May 28, 2021 Abstract The British party system is known for its discipline and cohesion, but it remains wedged on one issue: European integration. We offer a methodology using social network analysis that considers the indi- vidual interactions of MPs in the voting process. Using public Par- liamentary records, we scraped votes of individual MPs in the 57th parliament (June 2017 to April 2019), computed pairwise similarity scores and calculated rebellion metrics based on eigenvector centrali- ties. Comparing the networks of Brexit- and non-Brexit divisions, our methodology was able to detect a significant difference in eurosceptic behaviour for the former, and using a rebellion metric we predicted how MPs would vote in a forthcoming Brexit deal with over 90% ac- arXiv:1908.08859v3 [physics.soc-ph] 27 May 2021 curacy. Keywords| Social Network Analysis, Party Politics, House of Commons, Brexit, EU-Membership, Euroscepticism ∗Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] 1 Background The British party system is widely known to be a strong and disciplined one. Throughout its contemporary history, its two main parties|Labour and Conser- vative|has lent credibility to the Parliamentary process, setting the landscape for the effective implementation of policies in the British government. It is notable, however, that the cohesion and unity in the modern British party system is persistently wedged by one issue, which is that of European integration.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronicle 11-15 V3
    The Elsworth Chronicle Issue No. 38 November 2015 1 ELSWORTH CHRONICLE [Established 1990] Editor: Alan Farrow. The Old Rectory, Elsworth, Cambridge CB23 4JQ Tel: 01954 267472 Email: [email protected] Material for inclusion will be most welcome. Potential advertisers please contact the above. The magazine is distributed free of charge to just under 300 homes plus additional wider circulation . Find us at www.elsworthchronicle.org.uk INDEX Page 3 Community Car Scheme Page 4 Heidi Allen’s Maiden Speech Page 3 Elsworth, Knapwell & Conington WI Page 8 Elsworth’s Population Page 13 Jubilee Club Page 15 Obituary - Gordon Thwaites Page 18 Elsworth Sports Club NEWSPAPERS AND MAGAZINES ARE ON SALE ON MONDAYS THROUGH TO FRIDAYS EACH WEEK AT BOB EMPSON’S GARAGE FROM 8 AM TO 6 PM Magazines may be ordered in advance 2 AN ON-GOING MATTER Community Car Scheme With a favouring metaphorical wind, those in the parish without access to a car and of state pensionable age or disabled might soon re- ceive support. Our dependence in Elsworth of a reliable car needs no underlining. To live here for most is a delight, but without adequate transport the quality of life may be impaired. Hence the article in the May edition of the Chronicle. Matters might now be inching forward in that the parish council is to circulate a questionnaire designed to assess need. Consideration is now being given to possibly subsidising the cost of travelling by means of community cars for those falling into the groups noted above. Such a scheme, if invoked, would seem to be well deserved - here in Elsworh free bus passes are of limited value as the service provided is so poor in contrast to urban areas where adequate public transport is available, is well used and taken for granted.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Abuse Toward Candidates During the UK General Election 2019
    Gorrell et al. RESEARCH Online Abuse toward Candidates during the UK General Election 2019: Working Paper Genevieve Gorrell, Mehmet E Bakir, Ian Roberts, Mark A Greenwood and Kalina Bontcheva Full list of author information is available at the end of the article Abstract The 2019 UK general election took place against a background of rising online hostility levels toward politicians and concerns about polarisation. We collected 4.2 million tweets sent to or from election candidates in the six week period spanning from the start of November until shortly after the December 12th election. We found abuse in 4.46% of replies received by candidates, up from 3.27% in the matching period for the 2017 UK general election. Abuse levels have also been climbing month on month throughout 2019. The topic of UK withdrawal from the European Union drew an elevated level of abuse for candidates regardless of political party. Attention (and abuse) focused mainly on a small number of high profile politicians. Abuse is \spiky", triggered by external events such as debates, or controversial tweets. Abuse escalated throughout the campaign period. Men received more abuse overall; women received more sexist abuse. MPs choosing not to stand again had received more abuse during 2019. Keywords: UK general election; online abuse; twitter; politics Introduction Awareness is increasing of the social changes brought about through the rise of social media, and the consequences this can have politically. One area of concern is intimidation in public life. Where individuals are intimidated from participating in politics, democracy can be compromised. Dialogue on the subject takes the form of media[1] and government[2] engagement, research effort and innovation from the platforms.[3] Yet there is much work still to be done in understanding the causes of internet toxicity and in forming an effective response.
    [Show full text]
  • Heidi Allen MP Newsletter #37 050319
    As you probably now know, on the 20th February I announced my resignation from the Conservative Party and joined The Independent Group of MPs. This was an incredibly difficult decision but I believe our country deserves better. More competence, more collaboration, more expert analysis, more transparency, more care, more fairness and less entrenched political ideology. So I have joined, alongside 10 other MPs of both Conservative and Labour backgrounds, The Independent Group. In time, our intention is to form a new political party, positioned in the centre ground of British politics. More information, including my resignation letter and statement can be found on my website - https://www.heidiallen.co.uk/ I know that not everyone will be happy, but I can honestly say I have been bowled over by the overwhelming support that literally thousands of my constituents have shown for my decision. It means so much to me to know that my decision, hard though it was, has been received so well locally. I became an MP in 2015 as I wanted to serve my country and give a voice to those who did not have one - that has not changed. It remains a great honour to be your Member of Parliament and although I may have lost my party label, I have not lost my determination to serve you with everything that I have. I’ll continue to fight for the very best for South Cambridgeshire: providing excellent local services, ensuring fairer funding for those services, delivering on the vital infrastructure projects we need and continuing to be a voice for the vulnerable in our community.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrew Marr Show, Michael Gove 1
    ANDREW MARR SHOW, MICHAEL GOVE 1 ANDREW MARR SHOW, ANDREW GOVE, MP ENVIRONMENT SECRETARY AM: Now in one of the many extraordinary moments in what has been a vintage political week of twist and turns. Three Cabinet ministers, Amber Rudd, Gregg Clark and David Gauke wrote a joint article in the Daily Mail in which they effectively warned Theresa May they would support a Commons veto against No Deal. It was a direct challenge to the authority of the Prime Minister of a kind I can’t quite remember before and there are stories of up to 20 Tory ministers resigning their positions to vote on the same issue. That and the defection of the three Tory MPs raises real questions about the stability of the Tory family. Environment Secretary Michael Gove who was one of the leaders of the Brexit campaign who stayed loyal to Theresa May is with me now. Can I ask you first of all Michael Gove what your message is to Heidi Allen? MG: Well Heidi is someone who I’ve admired during the time that she’s been in the House of Commons. She’s campaigned on social justice and welfare issues with passion and with effectiveness. I’m sorry that Heidi’s left the Conservative Party. I hope that there will be a moment in the past where she can rejoin us. My admiration for her remains undimmed, even as I regret the decision that she’s taken. AM: Now one of the reasons those three Tory MPs left is that they believe that the Tory Party has been taken over by as it the hard line Brexiteer ERG group of MPs and that the Prime Minister is listening only to them.
    [Show full text]
  • February 2019
    February 2019 This is the ninth update shedding light on what catches the eye in and around Westminster and its satellite community of advisers, think tanks and hangers on. Some of this may have been captured in the headlines and other stuff. Views my own but an acknowledgement that everyone is working hard in a challenging political environment and bad- tempered world….and one last thing, with literally weeks to go to the designated EU leaving date, this edition can’t possibly be a Brexit-free zone. Lisa Hayley-Jones Director, Political and Business Relations BVCA Key Political Dates Theresa May has overtaken Spencer Perceval (the only British Prime Minister in history to be assassinated) to become the 36th longest-serving Prime Minister. Theresa May needs to reach 28th May to surpass Gordon Brown’s record and the following day to outlast the Duke of Wellington. This week was meant to be a Westminster recess, a chance for MPs to take a breather before the final countdown to Brexit Day on 29 March. The failure of the Prime Minister to reach a deal on Brexit that is acceptable to MPs forced the government to cancel their scheduled February break. Instead, activity in the House of Commons has been dominated by Statutory Instruments (SIs). These give Ministers the power to change pre-existing laws before exit day. This week's SIs range from European Structural Funds to clinical medical trials. The Prime Minister has until next Wednesday 27 February to make progress before MPs get another shot at wresting control over the Brexit process away from the government.
    [Show full text]
  • Six Shelford Artists Take Part in Cambridge Open Studios Heidi
    EST 1999 JULY 2019 PRICE 40p Six Shelford Artists Take Part in Cambridge Open Studios Photograph: Jenny Collier ???? ???? Heidi Allen Explains her Decision GREAT SHELFORD CONTENTS Parish Council Summary of Minutes 1 Cambridge Open Studios 28 Planning Applications 4 Bryan Storey, Optician 30 Planning Decisions 5 Sawston Open Gardens 32 Heidi Allen 6 Stapleford History Society 32 Parish Church 10 Twinning Visit 34 The Big Lunch 13 Playscape 37 Engage in the Afternoon 15 EastFest 37 Feast Cakes and Books 15 Old News 38 Free Church 16 WI 40 New Care Home 19 Nature Walk to Nine Wells 40 Editorial Committee Note 19 Cricket Club 41 Shelford School 20 Food and Drink Festival 41 Country Market 21 Tennis Club 43 Telephone Box 23 Rugby Club 45 Diary 24 Next Issue of the Village News 45 Bins, Post and Library 24 What’s On 46 Shelford Feast 25 Neighbourhood Plan 47 History Walk 27 How to Contact the Village News 48 Becoming a Host Family 27 Rainfall 48 GREAT SHELFORD PARISH COUNCIL CHAIRMAN Mike Nettleton 721366 VICE CHAIRMAN Malcolm Watson 844901 CHAIRMEN OF SUB-COMMITTEES Planning Roberto Gherseni 07930 671104 Highways Barrie Ashurst 07803 001985 Barbara Kettel 843920 Cemetery and Pavilion and Allotments Richard Davis 07595 339187 Recreation Malcolm Watson 844901 MEMBERS Paula Arnold 07831 351911 Ian Kydd 07923 364334 Simon Talbott 847068 Peter Fane 843861 Charles Nightingale 844763 Graham Townsend 07980 890264 Stefan Harris-Wright 505570 Gregory Price 07986 217852 Judith Wilson 840928 CLERK Mike Winter 07870 807442 / 504494 [email protected] DISTRICT COUNCILLORS Peter Fane 843861 Nick Sample 07706 990833 COUNTY COUNCILLORS Kevin Cuffley 832079 Roger Hickford 07985 770082 VILLAGE NEWS 1 GREAT SHELFORD PARISH COUNCIL greatshelfordparishcouncil.gov.uk SUMMARY FROM THE DRAFT MINUTES OF THE MEETING ON 15 MAY 2019 Mike Nettleton and Malcolm Watson were unanimously re-elected as Chair and Deputy Chair for the year May 2019 to April 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Fit for Purpose? the Facilitation Directive and the Criminalisation of Humanitarian Assistance to Irregular Migrants: 2018 Update
    STUDY Requested by the PETI committee Fit for purpose? The Facilitation Directive and the criminalisation of humanitarian assistance to irregular migrants: 2018 Update Policy Department for Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs Directorate General for Internal Policies of the Union EN PE 608.838 - December 2018 Fit for purpose? The Facilitation Directive and the criminalisation of humanitarian assistance to irregular migrants: 2018 update STUDY Abstract This study, commissioned by the European Parliament’s Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs at the request of the PETI Committee, aims to update the 2016 study “Fit for purpose? The Facilitation Directive and the criminalisation of humanitarian assistance to irregular migrants”. It takes stock of and examines the latest developments that have taken place since 2016, specifically the legislative and policy changes, along with various forms and cases of criminalisation of humanitarian actors, migrants’ family members and basic service providers. The study uses the notion of ‘policing humanitarianism’ to describe not only cases of formal prosecution and sentencing in criminal justice procedures, but also wider dynamics of suspicion, intimidation, harassment and disciplining in five selected Member States – Belgium, France, Greece, Hungary and Italy. Policing humanitarianism negatively affects EU citizens’ rights – such as the freedom of assembly, freedom of speech and freedom of conscience. When civil society is effectively (self-)silenced and its accountability role undermined, policies to combat migrant smuggling may be overused and give rise to serious breaches of the EU’s founding values, notably the rule of law, democracy and fundamental rights. Moreover, policing humanitarianism negatively affects wider societal trust and diverts the limited resources of law enforcement from investigating more serious crimes.
    [Show full text]