Moore2009chap65.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Moore2009chap65.Pdf Woodpeckers, toucans, barbets, and allies (Piciformes) William S. Moorea,* and Kathleen J. Migliab and divergence times of the Order Piciformes and its aDepartment of Biological Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, constituent clades to the level of families. MI 48202, USA; bDuke University Medical Center, Molecular As many as eight nominal families have been included Genetics & Microbiology, 210 Jones Building, Box 3020 Durham, in the Order Piciformes under various classiA cations: NC 27710, USA Picidae (wrynecks, piculets, and woodpeckers; ~28 gen- *To whom correspondence should be addressed (wmoore@biology. biosci.wayne.edu) era, 216 species), Indicatoridae (honeyguides; ~4 genera, 17 species), Megalaimidae (Asian barbets; ~3 genera, 26 species), Lybiidae (African barbets; ~7 genera, 42 spe- Abstract cies), Capitonidae (New World barbets; ~2 genera, 13 species), Ramphastidae (toucans; ~7 genera, 36 species, The avian Order Piciformes comprises two major lineages, the Pici and Galbulae, which diverged as early as 70 million years ago (Ma). The jacamars and puffbirds (Galbulae) also diverged relatively early, ~53 Ma. Later diversifi cation of the Pici gave rise to six additional families, beginning ~44–38 Ma. Molecular clock estimates for the origins of piciform clades, some estimated here, are consistent with the chron- ology of the sparse fossil record. With the exception of the woodpeckers, species of several piciform families were abundant on the northern continents during the Paleogene (66–23 Ma) but are now restricted to the tropics. 7 e Order Piciformes is a diverse assemblage of bird species that vary greatly in size, appearance, distri- bution, ecology, and life history. To the extent one can make descriptive generalizations, they tend to be stocky, brightly colored birds with disproportionately large bills—taken to an extreme in the toucans—and arbor- eal habits (Fig. 1). 7 eir distributions are restricted to the Asian, African, and New World tropics, with the excep- tion of the woodpeckers, which collectively have a more expansive distribution that includes the Old and New World temperate regions. Most species are insectivorous but many eat fruit at least occasionally and the barbets are primarily frugivorous. Cavity nesting is pervasive in the order, as is particularly well known for the woodpeckers, which have adaptations of the bill, skull, and associated musculature and enervation that renders them extra- ordinarily eB ective at excavating nest cavities in wood. 7 e honeyguides are nest parasites, but parasitize only Fig. 1 A Red-headed Woodpecker (Melanerpes erythrocephalus), cavity-nesting species. Here we review the relationships Family Picidae, from North America. Photo credit: R. Moul. W. S. Moore and K. J. Miglia. Woodpeckers, toucans, barbets, and allies (Piciformes). Pp. 445–450 in e Timetree of Life, S. B. Hedges and S. Kumar, Eds. (Oxford University Press, 2009). HHedges.indbedges.indb 444545 11/28/2009/28/2009 11:29:32:29:32 PPMM 446 THE TIMETREE OF LIFE Ramphastidae 7 6 Capitonidae 4 Lybiidae Megalaimidae Pici 3 Indicatoridae 5 1 Picidae Bucconidae 2 Galbulidae Galbulae Paleogene Neogene CENOZOIC 50 25 0 Million years ago Fig. 2 The timetree of woodpeckers, toucans, barbets, and allies (Piciformes). Divergence times are shown in Table 1. including two species of Semnornis), Galbulidae (jaca- were subsequently corroborated in a study by Lanyon mars; ~5 genera, 18 species), and Bucconidae (pu irds; and Zink (7) based on protein electromorph characters, ~12 genera, 35 species). Collectively, the species assigned although the latter study did not include a honeyguide to these families group into two clades that diverged rela- (Indicatoridae). 7 e tree hypothesized in these studies is tively early in the diversiA cation of Neoaves (1, 2). One ((((Indicatoridae, Picidae), (Ramphastidae, Capitonidae)), clade comprises the Galbulidae and Bucconidae and the (Bucconidae, Galbulidae)), Outgroup). Although these other comprises the Picidae, Indicatoridae, and barbets studies produced congruent results, some intraordinal and toucans, regardless of how the barbets and toucans details remained to be determined, and monophyly of are assigned to nominal families. 7 ese two ancient lin- the order as well as identiA cation of its closest relative eages are considered distinct orders, Galbuliformes and remained contentious. Piciformes, in some classiA cations, but suborders, Pici Olson (8), Burton (9), and Sibley and Ahlquist (4) and Galbulae, of Piciformes in others. Regardless of the argued that Piciformes is polyphyletic with the Galbulae nomenclature, the evidence is strong that the Pici and (Bucconidae and Galbulidae) related to the coraciiforms. Galbulae are both monophyletic. Until very recently, Lanyon and Zink (7) were not able to test the hypoth- however, it was less certain whether the Pici and Galbulae esis of monophyly of Piciformes directly, but they noted were closest relatives, but three recent studies based on that their distance data supported a closer relation- DNA sequence data from nuclear-encoded genes strongly ship of Galbulae to a coraciiform ( Momotus) than to support this hypothesis (1, 2, 10). 7 us, it is reasonable to other piciforms, which suggests paraphyly. However, recognize the Order Piciformes comprising two major recent DNA sequence-based studies consistently sup- lineages, the Pici and Galbulae, totaling ~403 species. port monophyly of Piciformes at statistically signiA cant Using Peters (3) classiA cation as a reference list for levels (1, 2, 10). Johansson and Ericson’s (1) study, based species usually included in an order called Piciformes, on exon segments from the nuclear RAG1 and c-myc the history of systematic groupings of those species genes and intron II from the myoglobin gene totaling into families, superfamilies, and suborders is a kaleido- 3400 nucleotides, was speciA cally designed to test the scope through the nineteenth and much of the twen- close relationship of Pici and Galbulae and thus mono- tieth centuries. 7 e early systematic history has been phyly of Piciformes. Combining all sequences from the thoroughly reviewed (1,4–6). Considerable stability of three genes, monophyly was supported by maximum inferred relationships was established with the cladistic parsimony (90% bootstrap) and Bayesian (100% poster- studies of Swierczewski and Raikow ( 5), and Simpson ior probability) analyses. 7 e maximum likelihood ana- and CracraJ (6) based on myological and osteological lysis based on the “Early Bird” data set also inferred a characters. 7 ese studies reached identical conclusions monophyletic Piciformes with 100% BS support (2). 7 e regarding relationships among piciform families, which “Early Bird” data set is more comprehensive and includes HHedges.indbedges.indb 444646 11/28/2009/28/2009 11:29:35:29:35 PPMM Eukaryota; Metazoa; Vertebrata; Aves; Piciformes 447 Table 1. Divergence times (Ma) and their confi dence/credibility intervals (CI) among woodpeckers, toucans, barbets, and allies (Piciformes). Timetree Estimates Node Time Ref. (10) Ref. (17) Ref. (22) Time Time CI Time CI 161.85370.589–5793.6107–80 255.05356.974–4473.692–53 340.943.638.151–2873.289–59 431.532.530.542–21– – 529.930.928.840–20– – 6 24.6 24.6 24.6 – 50.9 65–36 7 13.4 13.4 13.4 – 48 63–34 Note: Node times in the timetree represent the mean of time estimates from two studies (10, 17). PATHd8 analysis of DNA sequences from fi ve nuclear genes was conducted in ref. (10). Ref. (17) presents a reanalysis of the same data using the Bayesian program Multidivtime. Some divergence times were estimated here, which is detailed in the text. ~32,000 nucleotides from 19 nuclear gene regions and likelihood and Bayesian) and a dense taxon sample ena- 169 species. 7 us the inferred descent of species, listed bled him to resolve nearly complete relationships among by Peters, from a common ancestor is probably true; that species comprising the traditional Capitonidae and is, Piciformes is monophyletic and, thus, a valid taxon. Ramphastidae, including enigmatic basal lineages and/or With regard to relationships within and among fam- convergent lineages such as Gymnobucco, Calorhamphus, ilies, the greatest uncertainty has involved the barbets Semnornis, and Trachyphonus. and toucans. Traditionally the barbets, which occur in Moyle’s analyses strongly support the existence of three the African, Asian, and New World tropics, were con- geographically deA ned clades: Asian barbets, African sidered a single family, the Capitonidae, and the tou- barbets, and New World barbets, the last one including cans, which are restricted to the New World, were put the toucans. 7 is is consistent with the earlier A nding of in a separate family, the Ramphastidae (3). A series of Sibley and Ahlquist (4), and their recognition of three recent studies, however, have been consistent in show- families is warranted: Lybiidae (African), Megalaimidae ing that the traditional Capitonidae is paraphyletic with (Asian), and Capitonidae (New World). Recognition of a close relationship between the New World barbets and the Family Ramphastidae also seems warranted, but toucans and that the Asian and African barbets, each a the placement of the toucan-barbet, Semnornis ram- distinct clade, are more distantly related. 7 ese recent phastinus, then becomes an issue. 7 is species, which studies are based on anatomical (9, 11) as well as molecu- appears very much like what one might imagine as the lar characters (4, 12–14). common ancestor of
Recommended publications
  • 500 Natural Sciences and Mathematics
    500 500 Natural sciences and mathematics Natural sciences: sciences that deal with matter and energy, or with objects and processes observable in nature Class here interdisciplinary works on natural and applied sciences Class natural history in 508. Class scientific principles of a subject with the subject, plus notation 01 from Table 1, e.g., scientific principles of photography 770.1 For government policy on science, see 338.9; for applied sciences, see 600 See Manual at 231.7 vs. 213, 500, 576.8; also at 338.9 vs. 352.7, 500; also at 500 vs. 001 SUMMARY 500.2–.8 [Physical sciences, space sciences, groups of people] 501–509 Standard subdivisions and natural history 510 Mathematics 520 Astronomy and allied sciences 530 Physics 540 Chemistry and allied sciences 550 Earth sciences 560 Paleontology 570 Biology 580 Plants 590 Animals .2 Physical sciences For astronomy and allied sciences, see 520; for physics, see 530; for chemistry and allied sciences, see 540; for earth sciences, see 550 .5 Space sciences For astronomy, see 520; for earth sciences in other worlds, see 550. For space sciences aspects of a specific subject, see the subject, plus notation 091 from Table 1, e.g., chemical reactions in space 541.390919 See Manual at 520 vs. 500.5, 523.1, 530.1, 919.9 .8 Groups of people Add to base number 500.8 the numbers following —08 in notation 081–089 from Table 1, e.g., women in science 500.82 501 Philosophy and theory Class scientific method as a general research technique in 001.4; class scientific method applied in the natural sciences in 507.2 502 Miscellany 577 502 Dewey Decimal Classification 502 .8 Auxiliary techniques and procedures; apparatus, equipment, materials Including microscopy; microscopes; interdisciplinary works on microscopy Class stereology with compound microscopes, stereology with electron microscopes in 502; class interdisciplinary works on photomicrography in 778.3 For manufacture of microscopes, see 681.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Checklist Guánica Biosphere Reserve Puerto Rico
    United States Department of Agriculture BirD CheCklist Guánica Biosphere reserve Puerto rico Wayne J. Arendt, John Faaborg, Miguel Canals, and Jerry Bauer Forest Service Research & Development Southern Research Station Research Note SRS-23 The Authors: Wayne J. Arendt, International Institute of Tropical Forestry, U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Sabana Field Research Station, HC 2 Box 6205, Luquillo, PR 00773, USA; John Faaborg, Division of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211-7400, USA; Miguel Canals, DRNA—Bosque de Guánica, P.O. Box 1185, Guánica, PR 00653-1185, USA; and Jerry Bauer, International Institute of Tropical Forestry, U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Río Piedras, PR 00926, USA. Cover Photos Large cover photograph by Jerry Bauer; small cover photographs by Mike Morel. Product Disclaimer The use of trade or firm names in this publication is for reader information and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture of any product or service. April 2015 Southern Research Station 200 W.T. Weaver Blvd. Asheville, NC 28804 www.srs.fs.usda.gov BirD CheCklist Guánica Biosphere reserve Puerto rico Wayne J. Arendt, John Faaborg, Miguel Canals, and Jerry Bauer ABSTRACt This research note compiles 43 years of research and monitoring data to produce the first comprehensive checklist of the dry forest avian community found within the Guánica Biosphere Reserve. We provide an overview of the reserve along with sighting locales, a list of 185 birds with their resident status and abundance, and a list of the available bird habitats. Photographs of habitats and some of the bird species are included.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of Woodpecker – Common Starling Interactions: a Comparison of Old World and New World Species and Populations
    Ornis Hungarica 2016. 24(1): 1–41. DOI: 10.1515/orhu-2016-0001 Dynamics of Woodpecker – Common Starling interactions: a comparison of Old World and New World species and populations Jerome A. JACKSON1* & Bette J. S. JACKSON2 Received: May 03, 2016 – Accepted: June 10, 2016 Jerome A. Jackson & Bette J. S. Jackson 2016. Dynamics of Woodpecker – Common Starling interactions: a comparison of Old World and New World species and populations. – Ornis Hun- garica 24(1): 1–41. Abstract Woodpecker species whose cavities are most usurped by Common Starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) are widespread and generalists in their use of habitats. These include primarily woodpeckers that are similar in size to or slightly larger than the starling – such as the Great-spotted Woodpecker (Dendrocopos major) of Eurasia and the Northern Flicker (Colaptes auratus) and Red-bellied (Melanerpes carolinus) and Red-headed (M. erythrocephalus) Woodpeckers of North America. Usurpation occurs primarily in human-dominated urban, suburban and exurban habitats with pastures, sports fields and other open areas that serve as prime feeding habi­ tats for starlings. Starlings prefer high, more exposed cavities with a minimal entrance diameter relative to their body size. Usurpation success depends on timing – optimally just as a cavity is completed and before egg-lay- ing by the woodpeckers. Starlings likely reduce woodpecker populations in more open, human-dominated habi- tats. Woodpecker habitat losses and fragmentation are more serious problems that enhance habitat quality for star- lings and reduce habitat quality for most woodpeckers. The only woodpeckers that might become in danger of extinction as a primary result of starling cavity usurpation are likely island species with small populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Pileated Woodpecker Dryocopus Pileatus
    Pileated Woodpecker Dryocopus pileatus Folk Name: Logcock, B’Jesus Bird, Johnny Cock Status: Resident Abundance: Rare to Uncommon Habitat: Mature forests “The pileated woodpecker is a living symbol of the American wilderness, a reminder of the virgin forests that existed before European axes felled the great trees. Along with the great horned owl, raven, and wild turkey, the big woodpecker was a part of the limitless eastern forests.” —John Trott, 2000 The Pileated Woodpecker is our largest woodpecker, growing almost as big as an American Crow. It is quite a distinctive bird with a very large stout bill and a “flaming” red crest. The male has a red malar stripe. It has a white eye line and a white stripe on its neck. From the neck down, its body is almost all black when perched. In flight, it shows a small white wing crescent on the upper wings and large white wing patches on the forewings below. It the Logcock,” published in the March 1888 issue of the can be very loud, and its calls will often echo throughout journal Ornithologist and Oologist. In it, McLaughlin the large expanses of mature forest where it nests. It can provides great detail on how to find Pileated nests, nest occasionally be found in younger forests with “scattered descriptions, clutch size, and more. He discusses seven large, dead trees.” Mature forests with larger diameter nests in Iredell County, at least two of which were active trees support more pairs of woodpeckers than forests with in early to mid-April, and he describes the Pileated as “a smaller diameter timber.
    [Show full text]
  • The Plate-Billed Mountain Toucan (Andigena Laminirostris) Feeding on a Caecilia Spp (Gymnophiona: Amphibia)
    Solano-Ugalde 43 Boletín SAO Vol. 20 Toucans feeding on a Caecilia (No. 2) – Pag: 43-45 ! The Plate-billed Mountain Toucan (Andigena laminirostris) feeding on a Caecilia spp (Gymnophiona: Amphibia) EL TUCÁN ANDINO PIQUILAMINADO (ANDIGENA LAMINIROSTRIS) ALIMENTÁNDOSE DE UN CAECILIA SP (GYMNOPHIONA: AMPHIBIA) Alejandro Solano-Ugalde1,2 1Fundación Imaymana, Paltapamba 476 San Pedro del Valle Nayón, Quito, Ecuador. 2Natural History of Ecuadorian Mainland Avifauna Group, 721 Foch y Amazonas, Quito, Ecuador. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract In this note I report a feeding event of two Plate-billed Mountain Toucans (Andigena laminirostris) upon a Caecilian. Overall, caecilians are poorly known; however at least another bird (Leucopternis princeps) has also been reported feeding on them. As predation was not observed, and based on the corpse state it is likely that the prey was killed prior to the take of the toucans. Keywords: behavior, diet, Ecuador, mountain toucan, new record. Resumen En esta nota reporto dos individuos del Tucán Andino Piquilaminado (Andigena laminirostris) que fueron observados comiendo a un Caecilia spp. Las cecilias son poco conocidos, sin embargo hay registros de otraespecie de ave (Leucopternis princeps) alimentándose de ellos. Ya que la depredación no fue observada, y dado el estado del cadáver, es posible que la presa haya sido matada antes de que los tucanes la tomaran. Palabras clave: comportamiento, dieta, Ecuador, nuevo registro, tucán andino. he genus Andigena (mountain-toucans) comprises On 29 October 2007, while conducting a biological T only four species confined to the northern Andes of survey along the Bellavista Research Station Road South America (Fjeldså & Krabbe 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • RED-BELLIED WOODPECKER Melanerpes Carolinus
    texas parks and wildlife RED-BELLIED WOODPECKER Melanerpes carolinus ©Bill Reaves Red-bellied and other woodpeckers are important nest providers for many other species. The holes they excavate in dead trees, poles and fence posts are used by bluebirds, wrens, chickadees and titmice to name but a few. It is important for many bird and animal species that we leave dead trees whenever it's safe to do so! Range Birds RED-BELLIED WOODPECKER Melanerpes carolinus Appearance Life Cycle Length: 10 inches Sexual maturity: Less than a year Wing span: 16 inches Mating season: Spring and summer. Weight: 2 3/4 ounces Red-bellied woodpeckers usually nest 2 or 3 Male red-bellied woodpeckers are medium sized times during a season. birds that have red caps and hind necks, black and Gestation: Eggs hatch in 12-14 days, the white barred backs and tails. Their belly feathers young fledge 24-27 days after that. are off white with a reddish tinge. Females are similar to males but lack the red hind neck. No. of young: 3-8, usually 4-5. Eggs are 1 inch long and white. Behavior Habit: Diurnal, cavity building, altricial, omnivores Diet: Insects, nuts, fruits and berries More Fun Facts! Breeding territory: 1 pair to 14 acres The woodpeckers bill is a multi-use Courtship between red-bellies tool for food gathering and even more includes mutual tapping and v- unusual, to get their courtship shaped flights. Most red-bellies message out. Male woodpeckers do remain year round. In urban areas not sing well, so they use their heads, their nests are often taken over by literally.
    [Show full text]
  • Toco Toucan Feeding Ecology and Local Abundance in a Habitat Mosaic in the Brazilian Cerrado
    ORNITOLOGIA NEOTROPICAL 19: 345–359, 2008 © The Neotropical Ornithological Society TOCO TOUCAN FEEDING ECOLOGY AND LOCAL ABUNDANCE IN A HABITAT MOSAIC IN THE BRAZILIAN CERRADO José Ragusa-Netto Departamento de Ciências Naturais, Campus Três Lagoas, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso do Sul, C.P. 210, 79620-080, Três Lagoas, MS, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected] Resumo. – Ecologia alimentar e abundância local do Tucano Toco, em um mosaico de habitats do cerrado. – Os tucanos são frugívoros do dossel que exploram áreas amplas e heterogêneas. O Tucano Toco (Ramphastos toco) é comum no Brasil Central, principalmente no cerrado. Nesse estudo avaliei a pro- dução de frutos, a abundância do Tucano Toco e seus hábitos alimentares em um mosaico de habitats do cerrado. Tanto as variações espaciais quanto temporais de abundância dos tucanos coincidiram com o perí- odo de frutificação das espécies consumidas extensivamente. Essas espécies, principalmente Virola sebifera na mata ciliar e Schefflera macrocarpa no cerrado, exibiram períodos prolongados de frutificação, além de serem conhecidas por produzirem diásporos com elevado teor de lipídeos. Por outro lado, com exceção de Eugenia punicifolia e Miconia albicans, os tucanos consumiram moderadamente muitos tipos de frutos ricos em açúcares, que estiveram disponíveis por breves períodos. Portanto, em razão do Tucano Toco explorar, durante a maior parte do tempo, proporções elevadas de poucas espécies de frutos e oportunamente alter- nar para uma dieta mais variada, ele exibiu variações acentuadas de amplitude de nicho alimentar. As pro- fundas variações espaciais e temporais de abundância, ao longo do ano, sugerem que os tucanos exploram áreas amplas e heterogênas em resposta à disponibilidade de frutos que são importantes em sua dieta.
    [Show full text]
  • ON 1196 NEW.Fm
    SHORT COMMUNICATIONS ORNITOLOGIA NEOTROPICAL 25: 237–243, 2014 © The Neotropical Ornithological Society NON-RANDOM ORIENTATION IN WOODPECKER CAVITY ENTRANCES IN A TROPICAL RAIN FOREST Daniel Rico1 & Luis Sandoval2,3 1The University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska. 2Department of Biological Sciences, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Avenue, Windsor, ON, Canada, N9B3P4. 3Escuela de Biología, Universidad de Costa Rica, San Pedro, San José, Costa Rica, CP 2090. E-mail: [email protected] Orientación no al azar de las entradas de las cavidades de carpinteros en un bosque tropical. Key words: Pale-billed Woodpecker, Campephilus guatemalensis, Chestnut-colored Woodpecker, Celeus castaneus, Lineated Woodpecker, Dryocopus lineatus, Black-cheeked Woodpecker, Melanerpes pucherani, Costa Rica, Picidae. INTRODUCTION tics such as vegetation coverage of the nesting substrate, surrounding vegetation, and forest Nest site selection play’s one of the main roles age (Aitken et al. 2002, Adkins Giese & Cuth- in the breeding success of birds, because this bert 2003, Sandoval & Barrantes 2006). Nest selection influences the survival of eggs, orientation also plays an important role in the chicks, and adults by inducing variables such breeding success of woodpeckers, because the as the microclimatic conditions of the nest orientation positively influences the microcli- and probability of being detected by preda- mate conditions inside the nest cavity (Hooge tors (Viñuela & Sunyer 1992). Although et al. 1999, Wiebe 2001), by reducing the woodpecker nest site selections are well estab- exposure to direct wind currents, rainfalls, lished, the majority of this information is and/or extreme temperatures (Ardia et al. based on temperate forest species and com- 2006). Cavity entrance orientation showed munities (Newton 1998, Cornelius et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Breeding Red-And-Yellow Barbets Trachyphonus Erythrocephalus in Southeast Sudan
    Scopus 29: 11–15, December 2009 Multiple broods from a hole in the wall: breeding Red-and-yellow Barbets Trachyphonus erythrocephalus in southeast Sudan Marc de Bont Summary Nesting and breeding behaviour of Red-and-yellow Barbets Trachyphonus erythrocephalus was recorded from a nest in the brick stone-wall of a house in Nanyangacor, south-eastern Sudan in 2005. There were at least five breeding attempts throughout the year, with at least four broods from this single nesting hole. The mean number of days in between broods was 27, and breeding did not appear to be directly related to rainfall. Introduction Barbets are known to breed throughout the year depending on their locality (Del Hoyo et al. 2002). In the temperate zone of southern Africa, breeding is seasonal and is limited to September–February, whereas in other areas, breeding can be opportunistic and year-round depending on rainfall. The Red-fronted Barbet Tricholaema diademata, for instance, is known to breed in virtually every month of the year (Del Hoyo et al. 2002). Similarly, the Crested Barbet Trachyphonus vaillantii from southern Africa can have up to four broods per year, whereas Yellow-breasted Barbet T. margaritatus of the Sahelian zone may have two broods. However, little is known of the multiple brooding behaviour of the Red-and-yellow Barbet Trachyphonus erythrocephalus. From 19 January 2004 until 5 January 2006, I lived in Nanyangacor (05°30’N 34°46’E), Kauto Payam, south-east Sudan very near the Ethiopian border. I observed Red-and-yellow Barbets in the vicinity of our house (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Arils As Food of Tropical American Birds
    Condor, 82:3142 @ The Cooper Ornithological society 1980 ARILS AS FOOD OF TROPICAL AMERICAN BIRDS ALEXANDER F. SKUTCH ABSTRACT.-In Costa Rica, 16 kinds of trees, lianas, and shrubs produce arillate seeds which are eaten by 95 species of birds. These are listed and compared with the birds that feed on the fruiting spikes of Cecropia trees and berries of the melastome Miconia trinervia. In the Valley of El General, on the Pacific slope of southern Costa Rica, arillate seeds and berries are most abundant early in the rainy season, from March to June or July, when most resident birds are nesting and northbound migrants are leaving or passing through. The oil-rich arils are a valuable resource for nesting birds, especially honeycreepers and certain woodpeck- ers, and they sustain the migrants. Vireos are especially fond of arils, and Sulphur-bellied Flycatchers were most numerous when certain arillate seeds were most abundant. Many species of birds take arils from the same tree or vine without serious competition. However, at certain trees with slowly opening pods, birds vie for the contents while largely neglecting other foods that are readily available. Although many kinds of fruits eaten by during the short time that the seed remains birds may be distinguished morphological- in the alimentary tract of a small bird. ly, functionally they fall into two main Wallace (1872) described how the Blue- types, exemplified by the berry and the pod tailed Imperial Pigeon (Duculu concinnu) containing arillate seeds. Berries and ber- swallows the seed of the nutmeg (Myristicu rylike fruits are generally indehiscent; no frugruns) and, after digesting the aril or hard or tough integument keeps animals mace, casts up the seed uninjured.
    [Show full text]
  • The Diets of Neotropical Trogons, Motmots, Barbets and Toucans
    The Condor 95:178-192 0 The Cooper Ornithological Society 1993 THE DIETS OF NEOTROPICAL TROGONS, MOTMOTS, BARBETS AND TOUCANS J. V. REMSEN, JR., MARY ANN HYDE~ AND ANGELA CHAPMAN Museum of Natural Scienceand Department of Zoology and Physiology, Louisiana State University,Baton Rouge, LA. 70803 Abstract. Although membership in broad diet categoriesis a standardfeature of community analysesof Neotropical birds, the bases for assignmentsto diet categoriesare usually not stated, or they are derived from anecdotal information or bill shape. We used notations of stomachcontents on museum specimenlabels to assessmembership in broad diet categories (“fruit only,” “ arthropods only,” and “fruit and arthropods”) for speciesof four families of birds in the Neotropics usually consideredto have a mixed diet of fruit and animal matter: trogons (Trogonidae), motmots (Momotidae), New World barbets (Capitonidae), and tou- cans (Ramphastidae). An assessmentof the accuracyof label data by direct comparison to independentmicroscopic analysis of actual stomachcontents of the same specimensshowed that label notations were remarkably accurate.The specimen label data for 246 individuals of 17 speciesof Trogonidae showed that quetzals (Pharomachrus)differ significantly from other trogons (Trogon) in being more fiugivorous. Significant differences in degree of fru- givory were found among various Trogonspecies. Within the Trogonidae, degreeof frugivory is strongly correlated with body size, the larger speciesbeing more frugivorous. The more frugivorous quetzals (Pharomachrus)have relatively flatter bills than other trogons, in ac- cordancewith predictions concerningmorphology of frugivores;otherwise, bill morphology correlated poorly with degree of fiugivory. An analysis of label data from 124 individuals of six speciesof motmots showed that one species(Electron platyrhynchum)is highly in- sectivorous,differing significantlyfrom two others that are more frugivorous(Baryphthengus martii and Momotus momota).
    [Show full text]
  • The Dazzling Diversity of Avian Feet I I Text Lisa Nupen Anisodactyl
    BIOLOGY insight into the birds’ different modes of life. THE BONES IN THE TOES Birds’ feet are not only used for n almost all birds, the number of bones locomotion (walking or running, Iin each toe is preserved: there are two swimming, climbing), but they bones in the first toe (digit I), three bones serve other important functions in in the second toe (II), four in the third (III) perching, foraging, preening, re- and five in the fourth (IV). Therefore, the production and thermoregulation. identity of a toe (I to IV) can be determined Because of this, the structure of a quite reliably from the number of bones in bird’s foot often provides insight it. When evolutionary toe-loss occurs, this into the species’ ecology. Often, makes it possible to identify which digit distantly related species have con- has been lost. verged on similar foot types when adapting to particular environ- ments. For example, the four fully demands of a particular niche or The first, and seemingly ances- webbed, forward-pointing toes environment. The arrangement tral, configuration of birds’ toes – called totipalmate – of pelicans, of toes in lovebirds, barbets and – called anisodactyly – has three gannets and cormorants are an ad- cuckoos, for example, is differ- digits (numbered II, III and IV) aptation to their marine habitat. ent from that in passerines (such orientated forwards and digit I The closely related Shoebill as finches, shrikes or starlings) in (the ‘big toe’, or hallux) pointing does not have webbed feet, per- the same environment. The func- backwards. This arrangement is haps because of its wetland habi- tional reasons for differences in shared with theropod fossils and The toes of penguins tat, but the tropicbirds, which foot structure can be difficult to is the most common, being found (below left) and gan- fancy form their own relatively ancient explain.
    [Show full text]