The Dazzling Diversity of Avian Feet I I Text Lisa Nupen Anisodactyl

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Dazzling Diversity of Avian Feet I I Text Lisa Nupen Anisodactyl BIOLOGY insight into the birds’ different modes of life. THE BONES IN THE TOES Birds’ feet are not only used for n almost all birds, the number of bones locomotion (walking or running, Iin each toe is preserved: there are two swimming, climbing), but they bones in the first toe (digit I), three bones serve other important functions in in the second toe (II), four in the third (III) perching, foraging, preening, re- and five in the fourth (IV). Therefore, the production and thermoregulation. identity of a toe (I to IV) can be determined Because of this, the structure of a quite reliably from the number of bones in bird’s foot often provides insight it. When evolutionary toe-loss occurs, this into the species’ ecology. Often, makes it possible to identify which digit distantly related species have con- has been lost. verged on similar foot types when adapting to particular environ- ments. For example, the four fully demands of a particular niche or The first, and seemingly ances- webbed, forward-pointing toes environment. The arrangement tral, configuration of birds’ toes – called totipalmate – of pelicans, of toes in lovebirds, barbets and – called anisodactyly – has three gannets and cormorants are an ad- cuckoos, for example, is differ- digits (numbered II, III and IV) aptation to their marine habitat. ent from that in passerines (such orientated forwards and digit I The closely related Shoebill as finches, shrikes or starlings) in (the ‘big toe’, or hallux) pointing does not have webbed feet, per- the same environment. The func- backwards. This arrangement is haps because of its wetland habi- tional reasons for differences in shared with theropod fossils and The toes of penguins tat, but the tropicbirds, which foot structure can be difficult to is the most common, being found (below left) and gan- fancy form their own relatively ancient explain. in more than three-quarters of nets (below) are both evolutionary lineage, are also toti- In an attempt to organise and bird species, including the webbed anisodactyl, but have palmate. Albatrosses, petrels and better understand the observed feet of ducks and penguins, most different webbing shearwaters, however, only have differences among avian feet, songbirds (such as sparrows and patterns (palmate three forward-pointing toes (dig- biologists have named five gen- weavers) and pigeons, buzzards, and totipalmate footwork its II to IV; digit I is vestigial) that eral categories that describe the vultures, eagles and gamebirds. respectively). Both are webbed – or palmate – as do arrangement of birds’ toes: aniso- The anisodactyl toe orientation is groups are adapted penguins, ducks and geese. These dactyly, zygodactyly (including well suited to perching and grasp- to an aquatic envi- species are all adapted to aquatic semi-zygodactyly), heterodactyly, ing, especially when the hallux > ronment. environments where webbed syndactyly and pamprodactyly. feet are clearly beneficial for However, like many concepts in locomotion. biology, there are exceptions, vari- III III Different foot types can be ations and intermediates that vio- IV II II IV DAVIDE GAGLIO equally suited to the functional late these ‘rules’. The dazzling diversity of avian feet I I TEXT LISA NUPEN ANISODACTYL The many different sizes and shapes of birds’ bodies, the astonishing variety of coloration in their plumage and bills and the functional precision of their wings have long intrigued and delighted nature enthusiasts. Perhaps distracted by the bold and beautiful features of avian form, one could be forgiven for overlooking another fascinating aspect of birds’ evolution: their feet. he fact that birds’ feet have digits on each limb – in other by the evolution of the dinosaurs’ a dinosaurian jizz is no words, were tetra dactyl – whereas forelimbs into wings, this diver- coincidence, since birds living reptiles (chameleons, lizards sification is no less significant. III III IV II II IV DAVIDE GAGLIO Tevolved from a group of reptil- and geckos) most often have five. And notably, the structure of III III The long toes of ian ancestors called theropod From this four-toed origin there birds’ feet, especially the orienta- IV II II IV I I African Jacanas rep- (‘beast-footed’) dinosaurs. Like has been a remarkable diversifica- tion and number of digits, or toes, TOTIPALMATE resent an anisodactyl most amphibians and birds to- tion in avian hind-limb structure. shows great variation at multi- arrangement. day, theropod dinosaurs had four Although overshadowed perhaps ple taxonomic levels, providing PETER RYAN I I PALMATE 34 AFRICAN BIRDLIFE SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2016 BIRDs’ feet 35 III II II III IV I I IV ZYGODACTYL left Cuckoos exhibit zygo- dactyly, the second most common toe arrangement among birds. below Semi-zygodactyly – the ability to rotate the outer toe forwards and backwards – occurs in owls. III II II III V V IV I I IV SEMI-ZYGODACTYL IV III III IV I II II I HETERODACTYL III III IV II II IV – described as semi-zygodactyly are many intermediate examples rollers. Similarly, among passer- or ectropodactyly. of birds with partly fused toes in ines it can sometimes be difficult There is another configura- this group. Extreme syndactyly to distinguish the syndactyl and I I tion – known as syndactyly – in occurs in the wood-hoopoes and anisodactyl conditions, as they SYNDACTYL which two or more toes (usually hornbills and diminishes progres- intergrade closely. III and IV) are fused to vary- sively through the kingfishers to The final arrangement of toes – The fused toes of birds, such as cuckoos and tura- to zygodactyly and heterodac- ing degrees. Syndactyly has been only minor fusion in Upupa and pamprodactyly – is found among syndactyl kingfishers cos, have this arrangement, but tyly might include increased grip well studied in humans as a con- finally the true anisodactyl feet of some mousebirds and swifts, > may increase grip it is also well suited to grasping, strength for perching resulting genital oddity that arises from strength for perching. as in parrots, and climbing, as in from two pairs of toes oppos- specific genetic mutations, and woodpeckers. These species are ing each other, and better grasp- five types of finger or toe fusion CONVERGENT EVOLUTION OF ZYGODACTYLY ALBERT FRONEMAN (4) not closely related, which sug- ing for similar reasons. Parrots, have been characterised. In the he osteological details of foot structure are different in woodpeckers above Only trogons is elongated, but it is not the only gests that zygodactyly has evolved among other species, routinely avian world, the fleshy sheath Tand cuckoos, indicating that these distantly related groups evolved possess a heterodac- evolutionary ‘solution’ to such multiple times. manipulate their food using their that unites the anterior digits is zygodactyl feet in different ways. In fact, zygodactyly seems to have tyl foot type, which activities. Trogons have a unique ar- feet – there are even left-footed thought to increase grip strength evolved independently in at least four groups of birds: the cuckoos, differs from a zygo- In the second most common rangement of digits – termed and right-footed parrots. Birds when the bird is perching, as it cuckoo roller, parrots and Piciformes (woodpeckers, barbets, honeyguides dactyl arrangement foot type among birds – called heterodactyly – which resembles such as ospreys, owls, mousebirds forces the digits to act in concert. and their allies). Whether it evolved due to some adaptive advantage or in that digits III and zygodactyly – digits II and III zygodactyly except that digits III and some woodpeckers have the Syndactyly is common among through random mutation is unknown. It has recently been suggested IV – not II and III – point forwards and digits I and IV and IV point forwards and I and ability to rotate the outer digit kingfishers, hornbills and bee- that anisodactyly evolved from a state of zygodactyly. point forwards. point backwards. Some perching II backwards. Some advantages (IV) forwards and backwards eaters (Coraciiformes) and there 36 AFRICAN BIRDLIFE SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2016 BIRDs’ feet 37 anisodactyl passerine counter- parts (compare bee-eaters, bar- bets and weavers, for example). It is difficult to explain why some aquatic or marine spe- cies are totipalmate and oth- ers have lost the hallux (having only three webbed toes). Or why some kingfishers retained four toes while others down-sized to three. Why is the hallux reduced or lost in many cursorial birds, but the roadrunners, as quintes- sential running ground-birds, IV III II I I II III IV retained the same zygodactyl arrangement that is found in other cuckoos? These questions DAVIDE GAGLIO remain to be answered. IV I I IV and is characterised by all four work by Walter Bock in 1959 sug- The best current understand- PAMPRODACTYL digits being directed forwards, gested that the four perching toe ing is that the different foot types enabling these species to hang configurations seen in modern evolved for perching and have Mousebirds are able their weight on all four toes and birds (anisodactyly, syndactyly, been secondarily repurposed for to hang, supporting even feed upside-down. heterodactyly and zygodactyly) other functions. For example, their entire weight each evolved in response to se- the zygodactyl foot is used for on their feet, thanks rom just this brief look at lection for a strong set of oppos- several different modes of lo- to the pamprodactyl digit orientation we can see able toes for perching rather than comotion (such as running and arrangement of their that foot type varies across for climbing. Interestingly, sev- hopping) and, in general, dif- toes. Fthe avian tree of life. Some early eral types of foot structure have ferent foot types may be equally evolved more than once through suitable for one particular func- convergent evolution; in other tion (perching or grasping). This EVOLUTIONARY TOE-LOSS words, distantly related birds have essentially means that the differ- everal families of birds, including rails, flamingos, evolved similar, but not identical, ent arrangements were a kind of Sgrebes, plovers, sandpipers and their allies, show arrangements of their four toes.
Recommended publications
  • MADAGASCAR: the Wonders of the “8Th Continent” a Tropical Birding Custom Trip
    MADAGASCAR: The Wonders of the “8th Continent” A Tropical Birding Custom Trip October 20—November 6, 2016 Guide: Ken Behrens All photos taken during this trip by Ken Behrens Annotated bird list by Jerry Connolly TOUR SUMMARY Madagascar has long been a core destination for Tropical Birding, and with the opening of a satellite office in the country several years ago, we further solidified our expertise in the “Eighth Continent.” This custom trip followed an itinerary similar to that of our main set-departure tour. Although this trip had a definite bird bias, it was really a general natural history tour. We took our time in observing and photographing whatever we could find, from lemurs to chameleons to bizarre invertebrates. Madagascar is rich in wonderful birds, and we enjoyed these to the fullest. But its mammals, reptiles, amphibians, and insects are just as wondrous and accessible, and a trip that ignored them would be sorely missing out. We also took time to enjoy the cultural riches of Madagascar, the small villages full of smiling children, the zebu carts which seem straight out of the Middle Ages, and the ingeniously engineered rice paddies. If you want to come to Madagascar and see it all… come with Tropical Birding! Madagascar is well known to pose some logistical challenges, especially in the form of the national airline Air Madagascar, but we enjoyed perfectly smooth sailing on this tour. We stayed in the most comfortable hotels available at each stop on the itinerary, including some that have just recently opened, and savored some remarkably good food, which many people rank as the best Madagascar Custom Tour October 20-November 6, 2016 they have ever had on any birding tour.
    [Show full text]
  • Altriciality and the Evolution of Toe Orientation in Birds
    Evol Biol DOI 10.1007/s11692-015-9334-7 SYNTHESIS PAPER Altriciality and the Evolution of Toe Orientation in Birds 1 1 1 Joa˜o Francisco Botelho • Daniel Smith-Paredes • Alexander O. Vargas Received: 3 November 2014 / Accepted: 18 June 2015 Ó Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015 Abstract Specialized morphologies of bird feet have trees, to swim under and above the water surface, to hunt and evolved several times independently as different groups have fish, and to walk in the mud and over aquatic vegetation, become zygodactyl, semi-zygodactyl, heterodactyl, pam- among other abilities. Toe orientations in the foot can be prodactyl or syndactyl. Birds have also convergently described in six main types: Anisodactyl feet have digit II evolved similar modes of development, in a spectrum that (dII), digit III (dIII) and digit IV (dIV) pointing forward and goes from precocial to altricial. Using the new context pro- digit I (dI) pointing backward. From the basal anisodactyl vided by recent molecular phylogenies, we compared the condition four feet types have arisen by modifications in the evolution of foot morphology and modes of development orientation of digits. Zygodactyl feet have dI and dIV ori- among extant avian families. Variations in the arrangement ented backward and dII and dIII oriented forward, a condi- of toes with respect to the anisodactyl ancestral condition tion similar to heterodactyl feet, which have dI and dII have occurred only in altricial groups. Those groups repre- oriented backward and dIII and dIV oriented forward. Semi- sent four independent events of super-altriciality and many zygodactyl birds can assume a facultative zygodactyl or independent transformations of toe arrangements (at least almost zygodactyl orientation.
    [Show full text]
  • MADAGASCAR: the Wonders of the “8Th Continent” a Tropical Birding Set Departure
    MADAGASCAR: The Wonders of the “8th Continent” A Tropical Birding Set Departure November 3—28, 2013 Guide: Ken Behrens All photos taken during this trip. All photos by Ken Behrens unless noted otherwise. TOUR SUMMARY Madagascar has long been a core destination for Tropical Birding, and with last year’s opening of a satellite office in the country, we have further solidified our expertise in the “Eighth Continent.” This was another highly successful set-departure tour to this special island. It included both the Northwestern Endemics Pre-Trip at the start and the Helmet Vanga extension to the Masoala Peninsula at the end. Although Madagascar poses some logistical challenges, especially in the form of the national airline Air Madagascar, we had no problems on this tour, not even a single delayed flight! The birding was great, with 196 species recorded, including almost all of the island’s endemic birds. As usual, the highlight was seeing all five of the incredible ground-rollers, from the roadrunner-like Long-tailed of the spiny forest to the wonderful rainforest-dwelling Scaly. There was a strong cast of vangas, including Helmet, Bernier’s, and Sickle-billed. In fact, we saw every member of the family save the mysterious Red-tailed Newtonia which is only regularly seen in the far south. As normal, the couas were also a favorite. From the shy and beautiful Red-breasted of Madagascar Set Departure Tour Nov. 3-28, 2013 the eastern rainforest to the huge Giant Coua of the dry western forest, we were looking for and at couas virtually every day! The bizarre mesites form a Malagasy endemic family, and we had superb extended views of all three members of the family.
    [Show full text]
  • Mousebirds Tle Focus Has Been Placed Upon Them
    at all, in private aviculture, and only a few zoos have them in their col1ec­ tions. According to the ISIS report of September 1998, Red-hacks are not to be found in any USA collections. This is unfortunate as all six species have been imported in the past although lit­ Mousebirds tle focus has been placed upon them. Hopeful1y this will change in the for the New Millennium upcoming years. Speckled Mousebirds by Kateri J. Davis, Sacramento, CA Speckled Mousebirds Colius striatus, also known as Bar-breasted or Striated, are the most common mousebirds in crops and frequent village gardens. USA private and zoological aviculture he word is slowly spreading; They are considered a pest bird by today. There are 17 subspecies, differ­ mousebirds make great many Africans and destroyed as such. ing mainly in color of the legs, eyes, T aviary birds and, surprising­ Luckily, so far none of the mousebird throat, and cheek patches or ear ly, great household pets. Although still species are endangered or listed on coverts. They have reddish brown body generally unknown, they are the up­ CITES even though some of them have plumage with dark barrings and a very and-coming pet bird of the new mil­ naturally small ranges. wide, long, stiff tail. Their feathering is lennium. They share many ofthe qual­ Mousebirds are not closely related to soft and easily damaged. They have a ities ofsmall pet parrots, but lack many any other bird species, although they soft chattering cal1 and are the most of their vices, which helps explain share traits with parrots.
    [Show full text]
  • Leptosomiformes ~ Trogoniformes ~ Bucerotiformes ~ Piciformes
    Birds of the World part 6 Afroaves The core landbirds originating in Africa TELLURAVES: AFROAVES – core landbirds originating in Africa (8 orders) • ORDER ACCIPITRIFORMES – hawks and allies (4 families, 265 species) – Family Cathartidae – New World vultures (7 species) – Family Sagittariidae – secretarybird (1 species) – Family Pandionidae – ospreys (2 species) – Family Accipitridae – kites, hawks, and eagles (255 species) • ORDER STRIGIFORMES – owls (2 families, 241 species) – Family Tytonidae – barn owls (19 species) – Family Strigidae – owls (222 species) • ORDER COLIIFORMES (1 family, 6 species) – Family Coliidae – mousebirds (6 species) • ORDER LEPTOSOMIFORMES (1 family, 1 species) – Family Leptosomidae – cuckoo-roller (1 species) • ORDER TROGONIFORMES (1 family, 43 species) – Family Trogonidae – trogons (43 species) • ORDER BUCEROTIFORMES – hornbills and hoopoes (4 families, 74 species) – Family Upupidae – hoopoes (4 species) – Family Phoeniculidae – wood hoopoes (9 species) – Family Bucorvidae – ground hornbills (2 species) – Family Bucerotidae – hornbills (59 species) • ORDER PICIFORMES – woodpeckers and allies (9 families, 443 species) – Family Galbulidae – jacamars (18 species) – Family Bucconidae – puffbirds (37 species) – Family Capitonidae – New World barbets (15 species) – Family Semnornithidae – toucan barbets (2 species) – Family Ramphastidae – toucans (46 species) – Family Megalaimidae – Asian barbets (32 species) – Family Lybiidae – African barbets (42 species) – Family Indicatoridae – honeyguides (17 species) – Family
    [Show full text]
  • Kingfishers to Mousebirds
    3.8 Kingshers to mousebirds - Atlas of Birds uncorrected proofs Copyrighted Material Kingfishers to Mousebirds he orders featured on this spread include many of the planet’s most P Size of orders Trogoniformes: trogons R Teye-catching bird families. Some, such as kingfishers and rollers, Number of species in order Trogons make up a single family, the Trogonidae, are known for their dazzling plumage. Others, such as toucans and Percentage of total bird species which numbers seven genera, including the spectacular quetzals (Pharomachrus spp.) of hornbills, sport preposterously big bills. Though smaller species Coraciiformes South and Central America. Their weak feet are in some groups may superficially resemble songbirds, all have a 403 species unique among animals in having a heterodactyl number of key anatomical differences from the Passeriformes, and 4.1% toe arrangement: first and second toes facing none can sing. backwards; third and fourth toes forwards. They are colourful but retiring birds that These orders also share many features of their breeding behaviour, inhabit tropical forests worldwide – with the with the majority of families and species nesting in holes, and many greatest diversity in the Neotropics – and use performing flamboyant courtship displays. The exception to this rule Piciformes their short, broad bill to feed on insects and are the Coliiformes of Sub-Saharan Africa, which are neither colourful 403 species fruit, generally gleaned from the branches in 4.1% a brief fluttering flight. Trogons are typically nor cavity nesters – they build a simple cup-shaped nest in foliage – and have located by their soft, insistent call, given ) an evolutionary history that sets them apart from other near-passerines.
    [Show full text]
  • Attempting to See One Member of Each of the World's Bird Families Has
    Attempting to see one member of each of the world’s bird families has become an increasingly popular pursuit among birders. Given that we share that aim, the two of us got together and designed what we believe is the most efficient strategy to pursue this goal. Editor’s note: Generally, the scientific names for families (e.g., Vireonidae) are capital- ized, while the English names for families (e.g., vireos) are not. In this article, however, the English names of families are capitalized for ease of recognition. The ampersand (&) is used only within the name of a family (e.g., Guans, Chachalacas, & Curassows). 8 Birder’s Guide to Listing & Taxonomy | October 2016 Sam Keith Woods Ecuador Quito, [email protected] Barnes Hualien, Taiwan [email protected] here are 234 extant bird families recognized by the eBird/ Clements checklist (2015, version 2015), which is the offi- T cial taxonomy for world lists submitted to ABA’s Listing Cen- tral. The other major taxonomic authority, the IOC World Bird List (version 5.1, 2015), lists 238 families (for differences, see Appendix 1 in the expanded online edition). While these totals may appear daunting, increasing numbers of birders are managing to see them all. In reality, save for the considerable time and money required, finding a single member of each family is mostly straightforward. In general, where family totals or family names are mentioned below, we use the eBird/Clements taxonomy unless otherwise stated. Family Feuds: How do world regions compare? In descending order, the number of bird families supported by con- tinental region are: Asia (125 Clements/124 IOC), Africa (122 Clem- ents/126 IOC), Australasia (110 Clements/112 IOC), North America (103 Clements/IOC), South America (93 Clements/94 IOC), Europe (73 Clements/74 IOC ), and Antarctica (7 Clements/IOC).
    [Show full text]
  • A Community Effort to Annotate the Chicken Genome
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/012559; this version posted December 12, 2014. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Submitted to Cytogenetic and Genome Research as part of the Third Report on Chicken Genes and Chromosomes The Avian RNAseq Consortium: a community effort to annotate the chicken genome (Prepared by Jacqueline Smith, David W. Burt and the Avian RNAseq Consortium) Publication of the chicken genome sequence in 2004 (International Chicken Genome Sequencing Consortium 2004) highlighted the beginning of a revolution in avian genomics. Progression of DNA sequencing technologies and data handling capabilities has also meant that genome sequencing and assembly is now a relatively simple, fast and inexpensive procedure. The success seen with the chicken genome was soon followed by the completion of the zebra finch genome (Warren et al., 2010), an important model for neurobiology (Clayton et al., 2009), again based on Sanger sequencing. In recent years the rapid advances in Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies, hardware and software have meant that many more genomes can now be sequenced faster and cheaper than ever before (Metzker, 2010). The first avian genome to be sequenced by NGS methods was the turkey (Dalloul et al., 2010), which was also integrated with genetic and physical maps thus providing an assembly of high quality, even at the chromosome level. Recently, NGS has been used to sequence the genomes of a further 42 avian species, as part of the G10K initiative (Genome 10K Community of Scientists, 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 National Bird List
    2020 NATIONAL BIRD LIST See General Rules, Eye Protection & other Policies on www.soinc.org as they apply to every event. Kingdom – ANIMALIA Great Blue Heron Ardea herodias ORDER: Charadriiformes Phylum – CHORDATA Snowy Egret Egretta thula Lapwings and Plovers (Charadriidae) Green Heron American Golden-Plover Subphylum – VERTEBRATA Black-crowned Night-heron Killdeer Charadrius vociferus Class - AVES Ibises and Spoonbills Oystercatchers (Haematopodidae) Family Group (Family Name) (Threskiornithidae) American Oystercatcher Common Name [Scientifc name Roseate Spoonbill Platalea ajaja Stilts and Avocets (Recurvirostridae) is in italics] Black-necked Stilt ORDER: Anseriformes ORDER: Suliformes American Avocet Recurvirostra Ducks, Geese, and Swans (Anatidae) Cormorants (Phalacrocoracidae) americana Black-bellied Whistling-duck Double-crested Cormorant Sandpipers, Phalaropes, and Allies Snow Goose Phalacrocorax auritus (Scolopacidae) Canada Goose Branta canadensis Darters (Anhingidae) Spotted Sandpiper Trumpeter Swan Anhinga Anhinga anhinga Ruddy Turnstone Wood Duck Aix sponsa Frigatebirds (Fregatidae) Dunlin Calidris alpina Mallard Anas platyrhynchos Magnifcent Frigatebird Wilson’s Snipe Northern Shoveler American Woodcock Scolopax minor Green-winged Teal ORDER: Ciconiiformes Gulls, Terns, and Skimmers (Laridae) Canvasback Deep-water Waders (Ciconiidae) Laughing Gull Hooded Merganser Wood Stork Ring-billed Gull Herring Gull Larus argentatus ORDER: Galliformes ORDER: Falconiformes Least Tern Sternula antillarum Partridges, Grouse, Turkeys, and
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin and Diversification of Birds
    Current Biology Review The Origin and Diversification of Birds Stephen L. Brusatte1,*, Jingmai K. O’Connor2,*, and Erich D. Jarvis3,4,* 1School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Grant Institute, King’s Buildings, James Hutton Road, Edinburgh EH9 3FE, UK 2Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China 3Department of Neurobiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA 4Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD 20815, USA *Correspondence: [email protected] (S.L.B.), [email protected] (J.K.O.), [email protected] (E.D.J.) http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2015.08.003 Birds are one of the most recognizable and diverse groups of modern vertebrates. Over the past two de- cades, a wealth of new fossil discoveries and phylogenetic and macroevolutionary studies has transformed our understanding of how birds originated and became so successful. Birds evolved from theropod dino- saurs during the Jurassic (around 165–150 million years ago) and their classic small, lightweight, feathered, and winged body plan was pieced together gradually over tens of millions of years of evolution rather than in one burst of innovation. Early birds diversified throughout the Jurassic and Cretaceous, becoming capable fliers with supercharged growth rates, but were decimated at the end-Cretaceous extinction alongside their close dinosaurian relatives. After the mass extinction, modern birds (members of the avian crown group) explosively diversified, culminating in more than 10,000 species distributed worldwide today. Introduction dinosaurs Dromaeosaurus albertensis or Troodon formosus.This Birds are one of the most conspicuous groups of animals in the clade includes all living birds and extinct taxa, such as Archaeop- modern world.
    [Show full text]
  • Early Paleocene Landbird Supports Rapid Phylogenetic and Morphological Diversification of Crown Birds After the K–Pg Mass Extinction
    Early Paleocene landbird supports rapid phylogenetic and morphological diversification of crown birds after the K–Pg mass extinction Daniel T. Ksepkaa,1, Thomas A. Stidhamb, and Thomas E. Williamsonc aBruce Museum, Greenwich, CT 06830; bKey Laboratory of Vertebrate Evolution and Human Origins of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100044, China; and cNew Mexico Museum of Natural History and Science, Albuquerque, NM 87104 Edited by Gareth Dyke, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary, and accepted by Editorial Board Member David Jablonski June 7, 2017 (received for review January 9, 2017) Evidence is accumulating for a rapid diversification of birds follow- Other fossils defy precise classification, but none can be con- ing the K–Pg extinction. Recent molecular divergence dating studies vincingly assigned to any clade within crown Aves, and only one suggest that birds radiated explosively during the first few million taxon identified from the Maastrichtian of North America appears years of the Paleocene; however, fossils from this interval remain to cross the K–Pg boundary (5, 8). Even fewer early Paleocene poorly represented, hindering our understanding of morphological birds are known, a situation exacerbated by the fact that strati- and ecological specialization in early neoavian birds. Here we report graphic resolution remains poor for many marine birds from the a small fossil bird from the Nacimiento Formation of New Mexico, Hornerstown Formation of New Jersey and terrestrial birds from constrained to 62.221–62.517 Ma. This partial skeleton represents the “Bug Creek” sequence in Montana, each of which contains a the oldest arboreal crown group bird known.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Species Occurring on Or Near Willapa National Wildlife Refuge
    Bird Species Occurring on or near Willapa National Wildlife Refuge COMMON NAME/SCIENTIFIC NAME Key: T = Threatened Species, E = Endangered Species, * = Known to nest in checklist area. Loons Ring-necked duck Aythya collaris Red throated loon Gavia stellata Greater scaup Aythya marila Pacific loon Gavia pacifica Lesser scaup Aythya affinis Common loon Gavia immer Harlequin duck Histrionicus histrionicus Long-tailed duck Clangula hyemalis Grebes Surf scoter Melanitta perspicillata Red-necked grebe Podiceps grisegena Black scoter Melanitta americana Horned grebe Podiceps auritus White-winged scoter Melanitta fusca * Pied-billed grebe Podilymbus podiceps Common goldeneye Bucephala clangula Western grebe Aechmophorus occidentalis Bufflehead Bucephala albeola * Hooded merganser Lophodytes cucullatus Shearwaters * Common merganser Mergus merganser Black-footed albatross Phoebastria nigripes Red-breasted merganser Mergus serrator Northern fulmar Fulmarus glacialis Ruddy duck Oxyura jamaicensis Buller’s shearwater Puffinus bulleri Pink-footed shearwater Puffinus creatopus Vultures Manx shearwater Puffinus puffinus * Turkey vulture Cathartes aura Short-tailed shearwater Puffinus tenuirostris Sooty shearwater Puffinus griseus Kites, hawks, eagles, and osprey * Northern harrier Circus cyaneus Storm-petrels * White-tailed kite Elanus leucurus Leach’s storm-petrel Oceanodroma leucorhoa Sharp-shinned hawk Accipiter striatus Fork-tailed storm petrel Oceanodroma furcate * Cooper’s hawk Accipiter cooperii Northern goshawk Accipiter gentilis Pelicans and
    [Show full text]