DOCSLIB.ORG

RECREATIONAL ASSETS of STATEWIDE SIGNIFICANCE in WASHINGTON STATE Study Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

RECREATIONAL ASSETS OF STATEWIDE SIGNIFICANCE IN WASHINGTON STATE Study Report September 30, 2019 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office Kaleen Cottingham, director Wendy Brown, policy director Adam Cole, natural resource policy specialist Katie Pruit, planning and policy analyst Julia Marshburn, administrative assistant Red Barn Communications The Otos Group Brit Kramer, principal Larry Otos, project manager Shelley Dahle, member services Recreational Assets of Statewide Significance Study Advisory Committee The Honorable Nancy Lilquist, David Patton, Northwest director Councilwoman, Ellensburg City Council Trust for Public Land Jon Snyder, recreation policy advisor Owen Rowe, governmental and Governor’s Office legislative affairs director Washington State Parks and Recreation Dave Schaub, member Commission Spokane County Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee Peter Schrappen, director of government affairs Mike Racine, director Northwest Maritime Trade Association Washington SCUBA Alliance Leah Dobey, Recreation Program manager Brian Adams, director Washington Department of Natural Skagit County Parks and Recreation Resources Department Cynthia Wilkerson, Lands Division manager Andrea Imler, advocacy director Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Washington Trails Association Chris Zipperer, physical activity coordinator Peter Mayer, deputy executive director Washington Department of Health Metropolitan Park District of Tacoma Cover photograph of Clear Lake near Doug Levy, principal Eatonville by Tony Sirgedas, courtesy of Outcomes by Levy the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ Back cover Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 1 Map Analysis ......................................................................................................................................... 7 Findings ............................................................................................................................................... 10 Foundational Assets .......................................................................................................................... 14 Exceptional Assets ............................................................................................................................. 22 Recommendations ............................................................................................................................. 29 Appendix A: Asset Reports ............................................................................................................... 38 Air Activities .................................................................................................................................................................... 39 Archery .............................................................................................................................................................................. 42 Bicycling and Walking................................................................................................................................................. 46 Boating (Motorized and Sailing) ............................................................................................................................ 51 Camping ........................................................................................................................................................................... 56 Climbing, Bouldering, and Scrambling ................................................................................................................ 60 Equestrian in the Backcountry ................................................................................................................................. 64 Firearms ............................................................................................................................................................................ 68 Fishing and Shellfishing ............................................................................................................................................. 72 Hiking and Backpacking ............................................................................................................................................ 75 Hunting with Firearms and Bows ........................................................................................................................... 80 Leisure Activities in Parks .......................................................................................................................................... 84 Mountain Biking ............................................................................................................................................................ 87 Mountaineering ............................................................................................................................................................ 92 Nature Activities ............................................................................................................................................................ 95 Off-Road 4x4 Riding .................................................................................................................................................... 98 Off-Road All-terrain Vehicle Riding ................................................................................................................... 102 Off-Road Motorcycling ........................................................................................................................................... 106 Paddling ........................................................................................................................................................................ 110 Paddling Whitewater ................................................................................................................................................ 114 Playing Sports ............................................................................................................................................................. 118 SCUBA ............................................................................................................................................................................ 122 Skiing .............................................................................................................................................................................. 125 Snowmobiling ............................................................................................................................................................. 127 Winter Trails ................................................................................................................................................................. 130 Appendix B: Outreach List .............................................................................................................. 134 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OVERVIEW Washington has an abundance of natural beauty and a rich tradition of providing outdoor recreation. The state is home to diverse landscapes that provide nearly unparalleled opportunities for outdoor enthusiasts. This makes Washington a great place to live, play, and do business. In addition, outdoor recreation contributes significantly to state and regional economies, public health, and environmental resiliency. With so much to gain by investing in outdoor recreation, the Washington State Legislature funded a study in 2018 to identify future recreational needs. It tasked the Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO) with identifying recreational assets of statewide significance, where gaps in recreational assets exist, and investment strategies and options for addressing those gaps. The Legislature also directed that the study must address existing and projected future needs of the people of Washington State. Over the course of the study, RCO consulted more than 80 interest groups, land managers, organizations, and individuals. An advisory committee consisting of local agency directors, state policy leads, and user groups provided guidance throughout the project. In addition, RCO looked at 146 recreational activities and more than 16,000 records of assets that support them. DEFINING RECREATIONAL ASSETS OF STATEWIDE SIGNIFICANCE The advisory committee recommended RCO study two types of recreational assets: foundational and exceptional. Foundational Assets are facilities that support the most popular recreational activities in the state (exceeding 30 percent participation)1. These facilities were deemed “foundational” to the recreational satisfaction and well-being of Washington’s residents. Walking trails, community parks, and swimming, are examples of activities provided by foundational assets. RCO mapped these assets by activity and then identified spatial gaps and levels of service by community. 1As identified in the State of Washington Assessment of Outdoor Recreation Demand Report, Prepared for RCO by Eastern Washington University, 2017 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Exceptional Assets represent the most popular, destination-oriented, and iconic places in the state to recreate. These assets are places of greatest importance to a recreational
Recommended publications
  • State Parks and Recreation Commission

    State Parks and Recreation Commission

    Table 1 Ten Year Capital Plan Project Listing Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Prior Reapprop. New Approp. New Approp. New Approp. New Approp. New Approp. Major Function, Agency, Project Estimate Total Expenditures 2017-19 2017-19 2019-21 2021-23 2023-25 2025-27 State Parks and Recreation Commission 30000086 Twin Harbors State Park: Relocate Campground State Building Construction Account - State 26,482,000 496,000 1,310,000 12,338,000 12,338,000 30000100 Fort Flagler - WW1 Historic Facilities Preservation State Building Construction Account - State 7,639,000 430,000 3,386,000 3,823,000 30000109 Fort Casey - Lighthouse Historic Preservation State Building Construction Account - State 1,616,000 217,000 1,399,000 30000155 Fort Simcoe - Historic Officers Quarters Renovation State Building Construction Account - State 1,770,000 292,000 1,478,000 30000253 Iron Horse - John Wayne Trail - Repair Tunnels Trestles Culv Ph 3 State Building Construction Account - State 4,877,000 606,000 4,271,000 30000287 Fort Worden - Housing Areas Exterior Improvements State Building Construction Account - State 6,605,000 500,000 1,043,000 2,461,000 2,601,000 30000305 Sun Lakes State Park: Dry Falls Campground Renovation State Building Construction Account - State 402,000 52,000 350,000 30000328 Camp Wooten Dining Hall Replacement State Building Construction Account - State 2,563,000 326,000 2,237,000 Table 1 Ten Year Capital Plan Project Listing Estimated Estimated Estimated Estimated Prior Reapprop. New Approp. New Approp. New Approp. New Approp. New Approp.
  • Executive Summary San Juan Islands Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan

    Executive Summary San Juan Islands Scenic Byway Corridor Management Plan

    execuTive SuMMary San Juan iSlandS Scenic byway corridor ManaGeMenT Plan whaT iS a corridor Purpose of Developing the ManaGeMenT Plan? Corridor Management Plan Citizens from communities on San Juan Island and Orcas Island, along with agency partners at the local, regional, state, and federal level, have joined A corridor management together to develop this corridor management plan (CMP), which charts a course for the future of the San Juan Islands Scenic Byway. The CMP includes plan presents a clear recommendations for expanding stewardship and enhancing visitors’ experiences along the byway, while at the same time preserving the sensitive vision of what the scenic scenic, natural, archaeological, historic, cultural, and recreational resources of the islands and the quality of life enjoyed by islanders. CMP recommendations byway organization also include expanding multi-modal transportation options to reduce environmental impacts, enhance community livability, and improve visitor access. intends to accomplish. Telling Our Stories With specific strategies The CMP includes recommendations for telling the many interesting for managing tourism stories of the byway through interpretation, education, promotion, and hands-on stewardship activities. Through various projects and programs, and protecting unique visitors will become inspired as they learn and understand how islanders: natural and cultural • Live in this unique environment • Conserve energy and water; with a strong commitment to • Promote and enhance visitors’ resources, the plan sustainability and stewardship; experiences in the islands by • Protect natural resources such offering abundant recreation should reflect community as endangered wildlife, marine opportunities; life, and unique habitats; goals and respect local • Create and display diverse • Preserve and restore cultural works of art and architecture lifestyles and cultures.
  • Iron Horse State Park and John Wayne Pioneer Trail Management Plan April 2, 2000 Appendix C: Page 1

    Iron Horse State Park and John Wayne Pioneer Trail Management Plan April 2, 2000 Appendix C: Page 1

    Iron Horse State Park and The John Wayne Pioneer Trail Management Plan Approved June 29, 2000 Washington State Parks Mission The Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission acquires, operates, enhances, and protects a diverse system of recreational, cultural, and natural sites. The Commission fosters outdoor recreation and education statewide to provide enjoyment and enrichment for all and a valued legacy to future generations. WASHINGTON STATE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION Washington State Parks Classification and Management Planning Project ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND CONTACTS The Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission gratefully acknowledges the many stakeholders of the Iron Horse State Park and John Wayne Pioneer Trail (JWPT) who participated in public meetings, reviewed voluminous materials, and made this a better plan. Iron Horse State Park Management Planning Team Brian Carter, Manager, Ginkgo Petrified Forest State Park Management Area Lance Elliott, Park Ranger, Iron Horse State Park (Kittitas Access) Tom Ernsberger, Eastern Region Assistant Manager Daniel Farber, CAMP Team Project co-lead Jim Harris, Eastern Region Manager Peter Herzog, CAMP Team Project co-lead Brian Hovis, Project Manager John Johns, Puget Sound Region Assistant Manager Tim Schmidt, Manager, Lake Easton State Park Management Area Keith Wersland, Park Ranger, Iron Horse State Park (Easton Access) Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission 7150 Cleanwater Lane, P.O. Box 42650 Olympia, WA 98504-2650 Tel: (360) 902-8500 Fax: (360) 753-1594 TDD: (360) 664-3133 Commissioners (when land classification was adopted): Clyde B. Anderson Bruce Hilyer Mickey Fearn Bob Petersen Joan Thomas Dr. Eliot Scull Cecilia Vogt Cleve Pinnix, Director Iron Horse State Park and the John Wayne Pioneer Trail Management Plan June 29, 2000 Page 2 IRON HORSE STATE PARK MANAGEMENT PLAN CERTIFICATE OF ADOPTION The signatures below certify the adoption of this plan by Washington State Parks for the continued management of Iron Horse State Park and the JWPT.
  • Silvicultural Options for Young-Growth Douglas-Fir Forests: the Capitol Forest Study—Establishment and First Results Robert O

    Silvicultural Options for Young-Growth Douglas-Fir Forests: the Capitol Forest Study—Establishment and First Results Robert O

    United States Department of Silvicultural Options for Young- Agriculture Forest Service Growth Douglas-Fir Forests: Pacific Northwest Research Station The Capitol Forest Study— General Technical Report Establishment and First Results PNW-GTR-598 April 2004 Editors Robert O. Curtis, emeritus scientist, David D. Marshall, research forester, and Dean S. DeBell, (retired), Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 3625-93rd Avenue SW, Olympia, WA 98512-9193. Silvicultural Options for Young-Growth Douglas-Fir Forests: The Capitol Forest Study—Establishment and First Results Robert O. Curtis, David D. Marshall, and Dean S. DeBell, Editors U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station Portland, Oregon General Technical Report PNW-GTR-598 April 2004 Contributors Kamal M. Ahmed, research associate, University of Washington, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Box 352700, Seattle, WA 98195-2700 Hans Andersen, Ph.D. candidate, University of Washington, College of Forest Re- sources, Box 352112, Seattle, WA 98195-3112 Gordon A. Bradley, professor, University of Washington, College of Forest Resources, Box 352112, Seattle, WA 98195-3112 Leslie C. Brodie, forester, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 3625-93rd Avenue SW, Olympia, WA 98512-9193 Andrew B. Carey, wildlife biologist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 3625-93rd Avenue SW, Olympia, WA 98512-9193 Robert O. Curtis, emeritus scientist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Forestry Sciences Laboratory, 3625-93rd Avenue SW, Olympia, WA 98512-9193 Terry A. Curtis, photogrammetry supervisor, forester, Washington Department of Natu- ral Resources, Olympia, WA 98501 Dean S.
  • Cultural Resources Management Plan: Mount Spokane State Park

    Cultural Resources Management Plan: Mount Spokane State Park

    Cultural Resources Management Plan Mount Spokane State Park July 2009 Prepared in compliance with Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission Policy 12-98-01 on Cultural Resources Management Your Responsibilities Under the Cultural Resources Management Plan People make plans work. The success of this plan depends upon you doing your part and helping others do theirs. Before you begin, it’s a good idea to review the agency Cultural Resources Management Policy Number 12-98-1 (amended August 2004). At Agency Headquarters If you are Senior Management: 1. Read the Executive Summary. 2. Understand the Range of Treatments. (Section IV) 3. Support the incorporation of scheduled treatments into the Capital or operating budgets. 4. Support the preparation of maintenance plans. 5. Support the development of specialized training needs such as rock wall or log building repair. If you are staff working on the park: 1. Read it all, front to back. 2. Understand the Range of Treatments. (Section IV) 3. Consult with agency Historic Preservation Officer (HPO) and use the Secretary of the Interior’s (SOI) Standards when developing projects identified in the Range of Treatments or any other projects that involve identified resources. 4. Consult with HPO and Archaeologist in the development of project work, maintenance plans, and work project requests. 5. Prepare the reports and records as established in Section V. At Region Headquarters If you are the Region Manager: 1. Read the Executive Summary. 2. Understand the Range of Treatments (Section IV) and any monitoring requirements. 3. Encourage training in both historic preservation basics and special skills necessary to work on log and stone buildings and structures.
  • Iron Horse State Park Trail

    Iron Horse State Park Trail

    Don Hoch Director STATE OF WASHINGTON WASHINGTON STATE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION 1111 Israel Road S.W. P.O. Box 42650 Olympia, WA 98504-2650 (360) 902-8500) TDD (Telecommunications Device for the Deaf): (360) 664-3133 www.parks.wa.gov Iron Horse State Park Trail Recommendations Report June 27, 2016 Iron Horse State Park Trail Advisory Committee Meeting Moses Lake 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report provides a compilation of the recommendations that will be provided to the Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission (Commission) for consideration at their July 21, 2016 meeting in Clarkston. The Commission will consider adoption of land classifications and a long-term boundary for the portion of the Iron Horse State Park Trail extending from Lind east to the community of Malden including a long- term boundary that extends from Lind west to the Columbia River and the Beverly Bridge. SUPPORTING INFORMATION Appendix 1: Iron Horse State Park Trail Location and Trail Management Map Appendix 2: Descriptions of Land Classification, Conditional Uses, and Long-Term Boundary Appendix 3: Land Classification and Long-Term Boundary Map Appendix 4: Iron Horse State Park Trail Management Recommendations Appendix 5: Real Estate Plan Appendix 6: Capital Budget Request Appendix 7: Operating Budget Request SIGNIFICANT BACKGROUND INFORMATION Initial acquisition of Iron Horse State Park Trail by the State of Washington occurred in 1981. While supported by many, the sale of the former rail line was controversial for adjacent property owners, some of whom felt that the rail line should have reverted back to adjacent land owners. This concern, first expressed at initial purchase of the trail, continues to influence the planning process today.
  • Economic Analysis of Outdoor Recreation in Washington State

    Economic Analysis of Outdoor Recreation in Washington State

    Economic Analysis of Outdoor Recreation in Washington State Earth Economics i Economic Analysis of Outdoor Recreation in Washington State January 2015 Report Version 1.2 Prepared By: Prepared For: Earth Economics Washington Recreation and Conservation Office Tacoma, Washington Olympia, Washington Primary Authors: Tania Briceno, Ecological Economist, Earth Economics Greg Schundler, GIS and Research Analyst, Earth Economics Suggested Citation: Briceno, T., Schundler, G. 2015. Economic Analysis of Outdoor Recreation in Washington State. Earth Economics, Tacoma, WA. Production Team: Aaron Schwartz, Research Analyst, Earth Economics Angela Fletcher, Research Analyst and Graphic Designer, Earth Economics Johnny Mojica, Research Assistant, Earth Economics Peter Casey, Research Assistant, Earth Economics Contributors: Wendy Brown, Advisor and Editor, Washington Recreation and Conservation Office Jim Fox, Advisor and Editor, James Fox Consulting John Loomis, Advisor and Editor, Colorado State University Acknowledgements: Leslie Connelly and Kaleen Cottingham from Washington’s Recreation and Conservation Office provided valuable feedback as well as Jim Cahill from the Washington State Office of Financial Management. Rebecca Hill from Colorado State University provided feedback on IMPLAN modelling and Randy Rosenberger from Oregon State University helped through his recreation value database. We would also like to thank all the agencies and associations that collaborated with data collection. Thanks to Brenden Mclane, Chelsey Aiton, and Professor Robert Aguirre who provided assistance as part of course work for the University of Washington Professional Master’s Program in GIS & Sustainability Management. Cover image by Jon DeJong, a creative commons image, see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/. ©2016 by Earth Economics. Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged.
  • RCFB April 2021 Page 1 Agenda TUESDAY, April 27 OPENING and MANAGEMENT REPORTS 9:00 A.M

    RCFB April 2021 Page 1 Agenda TUESDAY, April 27 OPENING and MANAGEMENT REPORTS 9:00 A.M

    REVISED 4/8/21 Proposed Agenda Recreation and Conservation Funding Board April 27, 2021 Online Meeting ATTENTION: Protecting the public, our partners, and our staff are of the utmost importance. Due to health concerns with the novel coronavirus this meeting will be held online. The public is encouraged to participate online and will be given opportunities to comment, as noted below. If you wish to participate online, please click the link below to register and follow the instructions in advance of the meeting. Technical support for the meeting will be provided by RCO’s board liaison who can be reached at [email protected]. Registration Link: https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_JqkQAGCrRSOwbHLmg3a6oA Phone Option: (669)900-6833 - Webinar ID: 967 5491 2108 Location: RCO will also have a public meeting location for members of the public to listen via phone as required by the Open Public Meeting Act, unless this requirement is waived by gubernatorial executive order. In order to enter the building, the public must not exhibit symptoms of the COVID-19 and will be required to comply with current state law around personal protective equipment. RCO staff will meet the public in front of the main entrance to the natural resources building and escort them in. *Additionally, RCO will record this meeting and would be happy to assist you after the meeting to gain access to the information. Order of Presentation: In general, each agenda item will include a short staff presentation and followed by board discussion. The board only makes decisions following the public comment portion of the agenda decision item.
  • C:\Documents and Settings\Mikul

    C:\Documents and Settings\Mikul

    MALAMA I KA HONUA Cherish The Earth JOURNAL OF THE SIERRA CLUB, HAWAI`I CHAPTER Volume 35 • Number 3 JULY - SEPTEMBER 2003 2003 Legislature: Leadership Failure It’s tempting to blame the new Administration for the fail- ure to enact meaningful reforms to protect Hawaii’s envi- ronment this year. But most of the progressive envi- Jeff Mikulina ronmental mea- sures failed to even pass the Democratic-con- trolled legislature. “In a list of ten priority issues,” observes Waimanalo Representative Tommy Waters, “the environment is, un- fortunately, tenth.” This reality of the 2003 legislature struck Waters par- ticularly hard. The freshman Waters was elected over Re- Gary Gill brings experience and enthusiasm to the Club publican Joe Gomes largely for his progressive views on protecting the islands’ fragile resources. But Waters likened his role this past session to a fresh- Gary Gill joins staff man football player stuck on the bench. It was those who have established their position in leadership were the ones Gary Gill, former environmental director for the state of handling the ball. Hawaii and former Chair of the Honolulu City Council, It seems clear from the sidelines, however, that the has become the “Director of Development” for the Hawai`i 2003 Legislature isn’t interested in scoring points for the Chapter. Under a one year grant from environment. the National Si- Lisa Carter erra Club, Gary’s Two dangerous measures came directly from Democratic work will focus on expanding the Club’s funding base, leaders in both the House and the Senate. Representative coordinating volunteers and increasing public knowledge Marcus Oshiro pushed for a measure to exempt a develop- of the Clubs purpose, mission and goals.
  • Campings Washington Amanda Park - Rain Forest Resort Village - Willaby Campground - Quinault River Inn

    Campings Washington Amanda Park - Rain Forest Resort Village - Willaby Campground - Quinault River Inn

    Campings Washington Amanda Park - Rain Forest Resort Village - Willaby Campground - Quinault River Inn Anacortes - Pioneer Trails RV Resort - Burlington/Anacortes KOA - Cranberry Lake Campground, Deception Pass SP Anatone - Fields Spring State Park Bridgeport - Bridgeport State Park Arlington - Bridgeport RV Parks - Lake Ki RV Resort Brinnon - Cove RV Park & Country Store Bainbridge Island - Fay Bainbridge Park Campground Burlington Vanaf hier kun je met de ferry naar Seattle - Burlington/Anacortes KOA - Burlington RV Park Battle Ground - Battle Ground Lake State Park Chehalis - Rainbow Falls State Park Bay Center - Bay Center / Willapa Bay KOA Cheney Belfair - Ponderosa Falls RV Resort - Belfair State Park - Peaceful Pines RV Park & Campground - Tahuya Adventure Resort Chelan - Lake Chelan State Park Campground Bellingham - Lakeshore RV Park - Larrabee State Park Campground - Kamei Campground & RV Park - Bellingham RV Park Chinook Black Diamond - RV Park At The Bridge - Lake Sawyer Resort - KM Resorts - Columbia Shores RV Resort - Kansakat-Palmer State Park Clarkston Blaine - Premier RV Resort - Birch Bay State Park - Chief Timothy Park - Beachside RV Park - Hells Canyon Resort - Lighthouse by the Bay RV Resort - Hillview RV Park - Beachcomber RV Park at Birch Bay - Jawbone Flats RV Park - Ball Bayiew RV Park - Riverwalk RV Park Bremerton Colfax - Illahee State Park - Boyer Park & Marina/Snake River KOA Conconully Ephrata - Shady Pines Resort Conconully - Oasis RV Park and Golf Course Copalis Beach Electric City - The Driftwood RV Resort
  • Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2015

    Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2015

    STATEWIDE COMPREHENSIVE OUTDOOR RECREATION PLAN 2015 Department of Land & Natural Resources ii Hawai‘i Statewide Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2015 Update PREFACE The Hawai‘i State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP) 2015 Update is prepared in conformance with a basic requirement to qualify for continuous receipt of federal grants for outdoor recreation projects under the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) Act, Public Law 88-758, as amended. Through this program, the State of Hawai‘i and its four counties have received more than $38 million in federal grants since inception of the program in 1964. The Department of Land and Natural Resources has the authority to represent and act for the State in dealing with the Secretary of the Interior for purposes of the LWCF Act of 1965, as amended, and has taken the lead in preparing this SCORP document with the participation of other state, federal, and county agencies, and members of the public. The SCORP represents a balanced program of acquiring, developing, conserving, using, and managing Hawai‘i’s recreation resources. This document employs Hawaiian words in lieu of English in those instances where the Hawaiian words are the predominant vernacular or when there is no English substitute. Upon a Hawaiian word’s first appearance in this plan, an explanation is provided. Every effort was made to correctly spell Hawaiian words and place names. As such, two diacritical marks, ‘okina (a glottal stop) and kahakō (macron) are used throughout this plan. The primary references for Hawaiian place names in this plan are the book Place Names of Hawai‘i (Pukui, 1974) and the Hawai‘i Board on Geographic Names (State of Hawai‘i Office of Planning, 2014).
  • Geological Field Trip 1 from Opals and Ancient Mountaintops to Ice Age Lakes Guide Written by Dr

    Geological Field Trip 1 from Opals and Ancient Mountaintops to Ice Age Lakes Guide Written by Dr

    1 Geological Field Trip 1 From Opals and Ancient Mountaintops to Ice Age Lakes Guide written by Dr. E.K. Peters WSU Geology Department OVERVIEW: The first portion of the trip is in central Pullman and may be most easily accomplished on foot. It consists of five stops, "A" through "E," and can be done in an hour or two. The rest of the trip requires a vehicle and will take the remainder of a long day. SKETCH MAP OF THE TRIP Start: Kate Webster Physical Science Building, WSU-Pullman Campus, College Avenue Proceed west on the service portion of College Avenue, under the skywalk of Owen Science Library and then onto the regular section of College Avenue. Continue west, going downhill. The steepest portion of College Avenue takes you 2 past engineering buildings on your right and then by WSU's power plant at the bottom of the hill. Stop A: Depending on the season, you may see large piles of bituminous coal at the power plant. Coal is the compressed and compacted remains of ancient plants. You can think of it as fossil plant matter, made mostly of carbon. There are three common grades of coal used in the world: 1. Brown coal or lignite: this is low grade coal. It has abundant nitrogen and sulfur impurities. It therefore does not burn cleanly. The nitrogen and sulfur compounds go up in the smoke and then combine with water droplets in the air to make "acid rain" (small amounts of nitric and sulfuric acids). Lignite (brown coal) is used in China today, but not in the U.S.