BUTE REVIEW [CEAA] Subject: Bute Proposal Comment Colette Spagnuolo Project Assessment Analyst Hi Colette, Thanks for Your Interest
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Page 1 of 3 From: andy sinats <email address removed> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 2:48 PM To: BUTE REVIEW [CEAA] Subject: bute proposal comment Colette Spagnuolo Project Assessment Analyst Hi Colette, thanks for your interest. Here are the comments you requested. cheers, Andy From: <email address removed> Subject: bute proposal comment Date: February 18, 2009 11:59:45 PM PST (CA) To: [email protected] Cc: [email protected] February 18, 2009 Marie-France Therrien Panel Manager, Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency 160 Elgin Street, 22nd Floor, Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Comment on Draft Terms of Reference for establishing a federal review panel for the proposed Bute Inlet Hydroelectric Project From: Andy Sinats Director BCEN ED Society Targeting the Overuse of Pesticides Thank you the opportunity to comment on the Draft Terms of Reference for establishing a federal review panel for the proposed Bute Inlet Hydroelectric and the draft federal-provincial environmental impact statement guidelines. I am a concerned citizen of British Columbia. The cat is out of the bag. The president of the proponent Plutonic power's Bruce Ripley stated a week ago, "For my government in British Columbia, I think that they are making a big mistake by precluding nuclear." This project for whose ecological impact these comments are being solicited cannot stand on its own and is an investment scam. Not only can this project not do what it purports to do, provide power in a reliable and consistent fashion, but like the pyramid scheme that it is, it require s innumerable add-ons, some of the totally uncertain. a) it requires yet another transmission line for the Bute project, parallel to one already at Toba Inlet, because Plutonic for sees its own need poorly b) it requires rain at the right time of year in a quasi-predictable amount and at present there are droughts in Mexico, California, Argentina, Australia, the southern US, China and I could go on. Planners here have been very slow in acknowledging any changes in warming or the economy and particularly the climate on which this project depends. c) it requires flow thru of four billion dollars in a time of economic uncertainty when all mega projects are tanking and infrastructure in the tar sands for one example is being abandoned to rust on the ground. When the cash from GE stops, all this prattle about PPPs will also be abandoned and the tax payer of BC will again be the bailer out of last resort just as the Olympic Village in Vancouver, the entire auto industry, and half the banks. d) it requires Nuclear power because Mr Ripley has himself acknowledged his project needs a prop. Therefore the terms of reference to review this projects feasibility have to reference, GE's future financial viability, world climactic uncertainty, the impact or additional transmission line corridors and the damage to the wilderness they entail;and the potential impact of industries that will be pulled along by this project such as nuclear which I remind the panel is under a moratorium in British Columbia. As to the ecological impact, what this project suffers from is an untenable distance from its consumer. This untenable distance between supply and demand is unsupportable except by a fracturing of the entire wilderness by tentacles and webs of transmission line corridors, bridges, roads, and structures all build with toxic materials. file://S:\Panels\Bute Inlet\Public Comments\bute proposal comment.htm 2/26/2009 Page 2 of 3 Recent research by Nathanael Scholz of the NOAA, and Dr. Keith Tierney of the University of Windsor has proven beyond reasonable doubt that salmon are adversely impacted by the copper, chromium, and arsenic compounds in pressure treated wood used in bridges, poles, and wooden structures. Although runoff may not constitute a lethal dose for salmon and other fish species, in fact a sub-lethal dose is all it takes to permanently impair the olfactory ability of salmon to evade predators, reproduce, and find their spawning river. It is obvious that industrialization of the wilderness entails considerable use of toxic materials. In particular the electric grid currently maintained by BC Hydro and BC Transmission consists of 1,100,000 poles treated with CCA. It is expected that run of the river projects and alternate energy projects that require transmission corridors to connect to this existing grid will have to apply for Pest Management Permits, and it is unlikely that the standards currently in place regarding NTZ's or No Treatment Zones, will be any more rigorous than the thoroughly insufficient setbacks in use today. It is only very recently that research has revealed that pulses in copper due to rain events particularly in the vicinity of road crossings at streams and rivers contribute to sub-lethal impairment of the olfactory ability of all vertebrates and have negative implications prejudicial to the entire web of life in the affected areas. Please see the attached studies by Scholz, Baldwin, et al. Other studies have shown Roundup and other glysophosates (Tierney, et al) typical of the herbicides used for weed control and maintenance of right of way corridors for heli-landing pads, railway beds, transmission line corridors, and other similar uses is also very prejudicial to salmon survival. In February 2009, First Nations fisherman report the salmon runs have never in their experience been as low as they are right now. Each of the two lower mainland dumps has at present 400-500 eagles, never seen there in such numbers, searching thru garbage because there are no salmon in our rivers. The entire web of life in British Columbia, without exaggeration, is at risk, Dr. Scholz, whose study is attached and who has studied copper leaching into the aquatic environment and its effect of migratory salmonids states: "Increasing runoff in areas of growing urban and rural development may explain why salmon are disappearing from streams throughout the West." Thank you for your consideration of these comments. I appreciate your attention to the concerns and recommendations expressed here, as we seek to reduce the planet’s toxic load of persistent bioaccumulative toxic chemical, and chemicals with other long-term toxic effects on health and the environment, to which road building, transmission lines, and the industrialization which accompanies IPP's, and logging is a major and unnecessary contributor. sincerely, Andy Sinats addendum: St. Francis--patron saint of ecology. Hymn to brother sun and sister moon Be praised, my Lord, of all your creature world, And first of all Sir Brother Sun, Who brings the day, and light you give to us through him, And beautiful is he, agleam with mighty splendor: Of you, Most High, he gives us indication. Be praised, my Lord, through Sisters Moon and Stars: In the heavens you have formed them, bright and fair and precious. Be praised, my Lord, through Brother Wind, Through Air, and cloudy, clear, and every kind of Weather, By whom you give your creatures sustenance. Be praised, my Lord, through Sister Water, For greatly useful, lowly, precious, chaste is she. Be praised, my Lord, through Brother Fire, Through whom you brighten up the night, And fair he is, and gay, and vigorous, and strong. Be praised, O Lord, through our sister Mother Earth, file://S:\Panels\Bute Inlet\Public Comments\bute proposal comment.htm 2/26/2009 Page 3 of 3 For she sustains and guides our life, And yields us diverse fruits, with colored flowers, and grass. Be praised, my Lord, through those who pardon give for love of you, And bear infirmity and tribulation: Blessed they who suffer it in peace, For of you, Most High, they shall be crowned. Be praised, my Lord, through our Brother Death of Body, From whom no one among the living can escape. Woe to those who in mortal sins will die; Blessed those whom he will find in your most holy graces, For the second death will do no harm to them. Praise and bless my Lord, and thank him too, And serve him all, in great humility. file://S:\Panels\Bute Inlet\Public Comments\bute proposal comment.htm 2/26/2009 Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Vol. 22, No. 10, pp. 2266±2274, 2003 Printed in the USA 0730-7268/03 $12.00 1 .00 SUBLETHAL EFFECTS OF COPPER ON COHO SALMON: IMPACTS ON NONOVERLAPPING RECEPTOR PATHWAYS IN THE PERIPHERAL OLFACTORY NERVOUS SYSTEM DAVID H. BALDWIN,² JASON F. S ANDAHL,³ JANA S. LABENIA,² and NATHANIEL L. SCHOLZ*² ²National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, 2725 Montlake Boulevard East, Seattle, Washington 98112, USA ³Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University, 333 Weniger Hall, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, USA (Received 11 September 2002; Accepted 15 February 2003) AbstractÐThe sublethal effects of copper on the sensory physiology of juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) were evaluated. In vivo ®eld potential recordings from the olfactory epithelium (electro-olfactograms) were used to measure the impacts of copper on the responses of olfactory receptor neurons to natural odorants (L-serine and taurocholic acid) and an odorant mixture (L-arginine, L-aspartic acid, L-leucine, and L-serine) over a range of stimulus concentrations. Increases in copper impaired the neurophysiological response to all odorants within 10 min of exposure. The inhibitory effects of copper (1.0±20.0 mg/L) were dose- dependent and they were not in¯uenced by water hardness. Toxicity thresholds for the different receptor pathways were determined by using the benchmark dose method and found to be similar (a 2.3±3.0 mg/L increase in total dissolved copper over background). Collectively, examination of these data indicates that copper is broadly toxic to the salmon olfactory nervous system.