Republique De Cote D'ivoire

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Republique De Cote D'ivoire REPUBLIQUE DE COTE D’IVOIRE Public Disclosure Authorized Union – Discipline – Travail ----------------------------------- MINISTÈRE DU PETROLE, DE L’ÉNERGIE ET DES ENERGIES RENOUVELABLES ----------------------------------- Public Disclosure Authorized PROJET DE TRANSPORT, DE DISTRIBUTION ET D’ACCES A L’ELECTRICITE (PTDAE) Public Disclosure Authorized PLAN D’ACTION DE REINSTALLATION (PAR) DES POPULATIONS AFFECTEES PAR LE PROJET DE RENFORCEMENT ET D’EXTENSION DU RESEAU DE DISTRIBUTION ELECTRIQUE DANS LA COMMUNE DE SEGUELA RAPPORT FINAL Public Disclosure Authorized Octobre 2018 ACRONYMES ET ABREVIATIONS Acronyme Définition ANDE Agence Nationale De l’Environnement BM Banque Mondiale CC Comité Consultatif CI-ENERGIES Côte d’Ivoire Energies CIES Constat d’Impact Environnement et Social CPR Cadre de Politique de Réinstallation CVGFR Comités Villageois de Gestion Foncière Rurales CTS Comité Technique de Suivi DU Direction de l’Urbanisme DFR Domaine Foncier Rural EECI Energie Electrique de Côte d’Ivoire LRDFR Loi Relative au Domaine Foncier Rural MCLU Ministère de la Construction, du Logement et de l’Urbanisme MINEDD Ministère de l’Environnement et du Développement Durable PAP Personnes Affectées par le Projet PAR Plan d’Action de Réinstallation P.O Politique Opérationnelle PSR Plan Succinct de Réinstallation PTDAE Projet de Transport, de Distribution et d’Accès à l’Électricité SOPIE Société d’Opération Ivoirienne d’Electricité SOGEPE Société de Gestion du Patrimoine du Secteur de l’Electricité TDR Termes De Référence 2 TABLE DES MATIERES TABLE DES MATIERES ................................................................................................... 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................. 6 RESUME EXECUTIF....................................................................................................... 10 ESTIMATION DES COUTS DU PAR ....................................................................................... 15 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 16 1.1. Contexte du projet .................................................................................................. 16 1.2. Justification du PAR ................................................................................................ 16 1.3. Objectifs du PAR ...................................................................................................... 17 1.4. Méthodologie du PAR ............................................................................................ 17 2. DESCRIPTION DU PROJET ET SA ZONE D’INFLUENCE ................................ 18 2.1. Promoteur Du Projet ............................................................................................... 18 2.2. Justification du projet ............................................................................................. 19 2.3. Zone d’influence du projet..................................................................................... 19 3. IMPACTS SOCIAUX POTENTIELS DU PROJET .............................................. 21 3.1. Activités qui engendrent la réinstallation ................................................................. 21 3.2. Impacts sociaux négatifs ............................................................................................ 22 3.3. Minimisation des impacts négatifs du projet ............................................................ 22 4. ETUDE SOCIOECONOMIQUE : RECENSEMENT DES PERSONNES, INVENTAIRE ET EVALUATION DES BIENS ................................................................. 23 4.1. Résultats des enquêtes socio-économiques. ...................................................... 23 4.1.1. Personnes affectées par le projet ..................................................................................... 23 4.2. Analyse socioéconomique ..................................................................................... 24 4.3. Besoins de recasement ........................................................................................... 24 4.3.1. Biens et actifs affectés .......................................................................................................... 24 4.3.2. Identification des groupes vulnérables .......................................................................... 25 5. CADRE LEGISLATIF ET REGLEMENTAIRE ...................................................... 25 5.1. Au plan national ...................................................................................................... 25 5.1.1. Loi portant constitution de la République de Côte d’Ivoire ................................... 25 3 5.1.2. Procédure d’expropriation .................................................................................................. 26 5.1.3. Décret n°95-817 du 29 septembre 1995 fixant les règles d’indemnisation des cultures et l’Arrêté n°247/MINAGRI/MPMEF/MPMB du 17 juin 2014 portant fixation du barème d’indemnisation des cultures détruites ................................................................. 26 5.1.4. Réglementation en matière de participation du public ........................................... 27 5.2. Au plan international .............................................................................................. 28 5.2.1. Politique de sauvegarde de la Banque mondiale ....................................................... 28 5.3. Comparaison entre la législation ivoirienne et la politique de la banque mondiale ................................................................................................................................. 30 6. RESPONSABILITES ORGANISATIONNELLES DE LA MISE EN ŒUVRE DU PAR ......................................................................................................................... 34 6.1. RESPONSABILITE ORGANISATIONNELLE ............................................................................ 34 6.1.1 Responsabilités pour la mise en œuvre du PAR ......................................................... 34 6.1.2 Dispositif de mise en œuvre du PAR .............................................................................. 35 6.1.2.1 Comité de pilotage ................................................................................................................ 35 6.1.2.2 Comité technique de suivi .................................................................................................. 35 6.1.2.3 Cellule d’exécution du PAR ................................................................................................. 35 6.2 FINANCEMENT DU PLAN D’ACTION DE REINSTALLATION ................................... 36 7. ELIGIBILITE ...................................................................................................... 36 7.1 CRITÈRES D’ÉLIGBILITÉ DES PERSONNES AFFECTÉES ............................................... 36 7.2 DATE LIMITE D’ÉLIGIBILITÉ OU DATE BUTOIR ............................................................. 36 8. EVALUATION ET INDEMISATION DES PERTES ............................................ 37 9. PROCEDURE DE PAIEMENT DES INDEMNISATIONS .................................. 37 9.1. LA CELLULE D’EXÉCUTION ..................................................................................... 37 9.2. PROCÉDURE DE COMPENSATION ........................................................................ 37 9.3. MODE D’INDEMNISATION ..................................................................................... 38 9.4. CLÔTURE DES INDEMNISATIONS ......................................................................... 38 10. PARTICIPATION ET CONSULTATION DES PAP............................................ 38 11. MECANISMES DE GESTION DES PLAINTES ET LITIGES ............................... 40 11.1. Types de plaintes et litiges ..................................................................................... 40 11.2. mécanisme propose ................................................................................................ 40 11.2.1. DISPOSITIONS ADMINISTRATIVES .................................................................................. 40 11.2.2. ENREGISTREMENT DES PLAINTES .................................................................................... 40 11.2.3. COMPOSITION DES INSTANCES PAR NIVEAU ............................................................ 41 4 11.2.4. VOIES D’ACCES ........................................................................................................................ 41 11.3. MECANISME DE GESTION DES PLAINTES ........................................................... 42 11.3.1 résolution à l’amiable.............................................................................................. 42 11.3.2 Recours à la justice .................................................................................................. 42 11.4. Evaluation de la satisfaction des populations sur la mise en œuvre du Mécanisme de gestion des plaintes (MGP) ................................................................................................. 43 12. CALENDRIER D’EXECUTION DU PAR ............................................................ 44 13. COUT ET BUDGET ESTIMATIF DES BIENS AFFECTES ................................................... 46 13.1. Coût estimatif des biens affectés par le projet ................................................... 46 13.2. Budget estimatif
Recommended publications
  • CSA Global Report Template 2019
    NI 43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT Séguéla Project, Worodougou Region, Côte d’Ivoire CSA Global Report Nº R182.2019 Report Effective Date: 19 March 2019 www.csaglobal.com Author and Qualified Person Matthew Cobb, MAIG, MIAMG ROXGOLD INC. NI 43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE SÉGUÉLA PROJECT, WORODOUGOU REGION, CÔTE D’IVOIRE Report prepared for Client Name Roxgold Inc. Project Name/Job Code ROXMRE02 Contact Name Paul Weedon Contact Title VP Exploration Office Address 360 Bay Street, Suite 500 Toronto, Ontario Canada M5H 2V6 Report issued by CSA Global Pty Ltd Level 2, 3 Ord Street West Perth, WA 6005 AUSTRALIA CSA Global Office T +61 8 9355 1677 F +61 8 9355 1977 E [email protected] Division Resources Report information Filename R182.2019 ROXMRE02 Roxgold Seguela NI 43-101 - DRAFT Report Effective Date 19 March 2019 Report Signature Date 23 July 2019 Report Status Final Author and Qualified Person Signature Matthew Cobb Coordinating PhD (Geology), MSc Author (Geostatistics), BSc (Hons), MAIG, MIAMG Ian Trinder Peer Reviewer MSc (Geology) P.Geo Aaron Meakin BSc (Hons) Geology, CSA Global Authorisation GradDipAppFin, MAppFin, MAusIMM CP (Geo) © Copyright 2019 CSA Global Report № R182.2019 II ROXGOLD INC. NI 43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE SÉGUÉLA PROJECT, WORODOUGOU REGION, CÔTE D’IVOIRE Date and Signature Page This Report titled “NI 43-101 Technical Report for the Séguéla Project, Worodougou Region, Côte d’Ivoire”, prepared for Roxgold Inc. with an effective date of 19 March 2019 was prepared and signed by the following author: _________________________________ Dated at Perth, Australia 12 April 2019 Matthew Cobb, PhD (Geology), MSc (Geostatistics), BSc (Hons), MAIG, MIAMG Principal Resource Geologist CSA Global Pty Ltd Report Effective Date: 19 March 2019 CSA Global Report № R182.2019 III ROXGOLD INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Plan Cadre De Gestion Environnementale Et Sociale (Pcges) ------Rapport Final
    REPUBLIQUE DE COTE D’IVOIRE Union – Discipline – Travail -------------------------------- MINISTERE DU PETROLE, DE L’ENERGIE ET DES ENERGIES RENOUVELABLES -------------------------------- -------------------------------- PROJET DE RENFORCEMENT DES OUVRAGES DU SYSTEME ELECTRIQUE ET D’ACCES A L’ELECTRICITE (PROSER) – PHASE 1 : ELECTRIFICATION RURALE DE 1088 LOCALITES(PROSER) - PHASE 1 : PROJET D’ELECTRIFICATION RURALE DE 1088 LOCALITES ------------------------------- LOT 3 : ELECTRIFICATION RURALE DE 164 LOCALITES DANS LES DISTRICTS DE LA VALLEE DU BANDAMA, DES SAVANES ET DU DENGUELEET DU DENGUELE ------------------------------- PLAN CADRE DE GESTION ENVIRONNEMENTALE ET SOCIALE (PCGES) ------------------------------- RAPPORT FINAL -- Octobre 2019 -- 0 TABLE DES MATIERES SIGLES ET ACRONYMES ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 4 LISTE DES TABLEAUX---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6 LISTE DES PLANCHES --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 1. RÉSUMÉ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8 2. INTRODUCTION --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Cote D'ivoire DEV 200465
    PROJECT BUDGET REVISION FOR APPROVAL BY THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR 5) To: Initials In Date Out Date Reason for Delay Denise Brown, Regional Director, RBD 4) Through: Initials In Date Out Date Reason for Delay Natasha Nadazdin, Programme Adviser, RBD 3) Through: Initials In Date Out Date Reason for Delay Jean-Pierre Leroy, Logistics Officer, RBD 2) Through: Initials In Date Out Date Reason for Delay Lydie Kouame, Resource Management Analyst, RBD 1) From: Initials In Date Out Date Reason for Delay Gianluca Ferrera, Country Director, Cote d’Ivoire Cote d'Ivoire Development Project 200465 B/R No. 4 Total revised number of beneficiaries 300 000 Duration of entire project 40 months, 1 September 2013 to 31 December 2016 Extension period 12 months, 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2016 WFP food tonnage (mt) 38 615 Project: Support for the integrated programme for sustainable school feeding Start date: 01/09/2013 End date: 31/12/2015 Extension period: 12 months New end date: 31/12/2016 Cost (United States dollars) Current Budget Increase (Decrease) Revised Budget Food and related costs 30 657 461 2 781 377 33 438 838 Cash and vouchers and related costs 3 414 800 (405 500) 3 009 300 Capacity development & augmentation 0 765 000 765 000 Direct support cost 6 212 235 1 203 599 7 415 834 Indirect support cost 2 819 915 304 113 3 124 028 Total cost to WFP 43 104 411 4 648 589 47 753 000 CHANGES TO: Food Tool C&V Tool Project Rates MT C&V Transfers CD&A LTSH ($/MT) Commodity Value C&V Related Costs DSC ODOC ($/MT) External Transport Project duration C&V Related (%) LTSH Other DSC (%) ODOC NATURE OF THE INCREASE 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Cote D'ivoire Project Appraisal R
    AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK PROJECT TO IMPROVE ACCESS TO ELECTRICITY IN RURAL AREAS COUNTRY : COTE D’IVOIRE closure Authorized Public Dis PROJECT APPRAISAL REPORT d e ure Authoriz Public Disclos RDGW October 2018 Translated Document TABLE OF CONTENTS I. STRATEGIC ORIENTATION AND RATIONALE ...................................................................... 1 1.1. Project Linkages with Country Strategy and Objectives ............................................................. 1 1.2. Rationale for Bank Intervention .................................................................................................. 1 1.3. Aid Coordination ......................................................................................................................... 2 II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................ 3 2.1. Project Description and Components ......................................................................................... 3 2.2. Technical Solution Adopted and Alternatives Considered .......................................................... 4 2.3. Project Type ................................................................................................................................ 5 2.4. Project Cost and Financing Arrangements ................................................................................. 5 2.5. Project Area and Beneficiaries ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Efficiency of Farms, and Fight Against Poverty: Case of the Cashew Sector in Côte D’Ivoire
    Journal of Agricultural Science; Vol. 12, No. 2; 2020 ISSN 1916-9752 E-ISSN 1916-9760 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Technical Efficiency of Farms, and Fight Against Poverty: Case of the Cashew Sector in Côte d’Ivoire Noufou Coulibaly1, Kone Siaka1, Yapi Yapo Magloire2 & Toure Sally3 1 Management and Applied Economics Department, Institute National Polytechnique Houphouët Boigny, Yamoussoukro, Côte d’Ivoire 2 Agriculture and Animal Science Department, Institute National Polytechnique Houphouët Boigny, Yamoussoukro, Côte d’Ivoire 3 College of Agronomy, Agro-economy Section, Institute National Polytechnique Houphouët Boigny, Yamoussoukro, Côte d’Ivoire Correspondence: Noufou Coulibaly, Management and Applied Economics Department, Institute National Polytechnique Houphouët Boigny, Yamoussoukro, Côte d’Ivoire. E-mail: [email protected] Received: June 17, 2019 Accepted: August 29, 2019 Online Published: January 15, 2020 doi:10.5539/jas.v12n2p106 URL: https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v12n2p106 Abstract Cashew was introduced in the north of Côte d’Ivoire to support the economy in the region. This study was conducted to evaluate the technical efficiency of cashew farms in Côte d’Ivoire. The technical efficiency of producers was measured using the Data Envelopment Analysis approach, and the determinants of this efficiency were identified using a TOBIT model. Data were collected in 4 regions: GBEKE, HAMBOL, PORO and WORODOUGOU. In the four regions studied, the average technical efficiency is 49.2% in Variable Scale Efficiency (VRS) and 38.3% in Constant Return to Scale (CRS). Based on our results, the producers in the study area were not efficient. The producers who follow the good practices, have a technical coefficient estimated at 74.2%, and superior to those who follow the good practices, of which, the coefficient is estimated at 70.2%, in Variable Scale Efficiency (VRS).
    [Show full text]
  • Ivory Coast: Administrative Structure
    INFORMATION PAPER Ivory Coast – Administrative Structure The administrative structure of Ivory Coast1 was revised in September 2011. The new structure, which consists of 14 districts (2 autonomous districts and 12 regular districts) at first-order (ADM1) level, is as follows: ADM1 – 14 districts (2 autonomous districts and 12 regular districts) ADM2 – 31 regions (fra: région) ADM3 – 95 departments (fra: départment) ADM4 – 498 sub-prefectures (fra: sous-préfecture) Details of the ADM1s and ADM2s are provided on the next page. A map showing the administrative divisions can be found here: http://www.gouv.ci/doc/1333118154nouveau_decoupage_administrative_ci.pdf The previous structure, consisting of 19 regions at first-order level, was reorganised as follows: 1. The cities of Abidjan and Yamoussoukro were split from their regions (Lagunes and Lacs, respectively) to form autonomous districts. 2. The northern regions of Denguélé, Savanes, Vallée du Bandama, and Zanzan were re- designated as districts with no change in territory. 3. The old Agnéby and Lagunes regions, excluding Abidjan (see no. 1), merged to form Lagunes district. 4. Bafing and Worodougou regions merged to form Woroba district. 5. The department of Fresco was transferred from Sud-Bandama to Bas-Sassandra region to form Bas-Sassandra district; the remainder of Sud-Bandama region merged with Fromager to form Gôh-Djiboua district. 6. Dix-Huit Montagnes (18 Montagnes) and Moyen-Cavally regions merged to form Montagnes district. 7. Haut-Sassandra and Marahoué regions merged to form Sassandra-Marahoué district. 8. N'zi-Comoé and Lacs regions, excluding Yamoussoukro (see no. 1), merged to form Lacs district. 9. Moyen-Comoé and Sud-Comoé regions merged to form Comoé district.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Support for Sustainable School Canteens and Early Grade Reading in Ivory Coast (2016–2020)
    Integrated Support for Sustainable School Canteens and Early Grade Reading in Ivory Coast (2016–2020) Baseline Report July 2016 Submitted by: Submitted to: Lorenzo Manzoni Jacqueline Hamm Aldrette Michaela Gulemetova, Ph.D. Elly Bahati Laurence Dessein, Ed.M. AVSI – Ivory Coast Elnaz Safarha, M.S. II Plateaux IMPAQ International, LLC Boulevard Latrille 10420 Little Patuxent Parkway, Suite 300 1 étage, Galerie Santa Maria Columbia, MD 21044 06 BP 1980 Abidjan 06 IMPAQ International, LLC Page i ISSSC&EGRP Baseline Report TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF EXHIBITS ................................................................................................................. i ACRONYM LIST ...................................................................................................................... ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... iii CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 2 1.1 Context ............................................................................................................................. 2 1.2 Description of the Intervention ........................................................................................ 4 CHAPTER 2. EVALUATION APPROACH AND DATA ................................................................... 7 2.1 Research Objectives ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Les Enjeux De L'électrification En Milieu Rural De La Côte D'ivoire
    Les enjeux de l’électrification en milieu rural de la Côte d’Ivoire Kan Arsène Kouadio To cite this version: Kan Arsène Kouadio. Les enjeux de l’électrification en milieu rural de la Côte d’Ivoire. Géographie. Université de Lorraine, 2021. Français. NNT : 2021LORR0053. tel-03251420 HAL Id: tel-03251420 https://hal.univ-lorraine.fr/tel-03251420 Submitted on 7 Jun 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. AVERTISSEMENT Ce document est le fruit d'un long travail approuvé par le jury de soutenance et mis à disposition de l'ensemble de la communauté universitaire élargie. Il est soumis à la propriété intellectuelle de l'auteur. Ceci implique une obligation de citation et de référencement lors de l’utilisation de ce document. D'autre part, toute contrefaçon, plagiat, reproduction illicite encourt une poursuite pénale. Contact : [email protected] LIENS Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle. articles L 122. 4 Code de la Propriété Intellectuelle. articles L 335.2- L 335.10 http://www.cfcopies.com/V2/leg/leg_droi.php http://www.culture.gouv.fr/culture/infos-pratiques/droits/protection.htm
    [Show full text]
  • Roxgold Report Template 2020
    NI 43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT Séguéla Project, Worodougou Region, Côte d’Ivoire Roxgold Report Nº R2020.001 Report Effective Date: 29 January 2020 www.roxgold.com Author and Qualified Person Hans Andersen, MAIG ROXGOLD INC. NI 43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE SÉGUÉLA PROJECT, WORODOUGOU REGION, CÔTE D’IVOIRE Report prepared for Client Name Roxgold Inc. Contact Name Paul Weedon Contact Title VP Exploration Office Address 360 Bay Street, Suite 500 Toronto, Ontario Canada M5H 2V6 Report issued by Roxgold Inc. 360 Bay Street, Suite 500 Toronto, Ontario Canada M5H 2V6 Roxgold Inc T 416 203 6401 F 416 203 0341 E [email protected] Report information Filename R2020.001 Roxgold Seguela NI 43-101_F.docx Report Effective Date 29 January 2020 Report Signature Date 10 March 2020 Report Status Final Author and Qualified Person Signature Hans Andersen BSc (Hons), Author PGradCertGeostat MAIG © Copyright 2020 Roxgold Report № R2020.001 II ROXGOLD INC. NI 43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE SÉGUÉLA PROJECT, WORODOUGOU REGION, CÔTE D’IVOIRE Date and Signature Page This Report titled “NI 43-101 Technical Report, Séguéla Project, Worodougou Region, Côte d’Ivoire”, prepared for Roxgold Inc. with an effective date of 29 January 2020 was prepared and signed by the following author: _________________________________ Dated at Perth, Australia 10 March 2020 Hans Andersen, BSc (Hons), PGradCertGeostats MAIG Senior Resource Geologist Roxgold Inc. Report Effective Date: 29 January 2020 Roxgold Report № R2020.001 III ROXGOLD INC. NI 43-101 TECHNICAL REPORT FOR THE SÉGUÉLA PROJECT, WORODOUGOU REGION, CÔTE D’IVOIRE Certificate of Qualified Person – Hans Andersen As a Qualified Person of the Technical Report titled “NI 43-101 Technical Report, Séguéla Project, Worodougou Region, Côte d’Ivoire”, prepared for Roxgold Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • ABUNDANT RESOURCES, ABSENT DATA: Measuring the Openness of Australian Listed Mining, Oil and Gas Companies on the African Continent SUMMARY of FINDINGS
    AUSTRALIA ABUNDANT RESOURCES, ABSENT DATA: Measuring the Openness of Australian Listed Mining, Oil and Gas Companies on the African Continent SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 885 companies were identified on the ASX 3 companies are dual listed on the London within the Energy and Materials groups. Stock Exchange (LSE). 4 companies are dual listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX) 168 companies were excluded from the and 1 additional company was in the process analysis. The decision to exclude a company of applying for listing on the TSX. was made if the company was delisted from the ASX at the time of the data collection, or if the 7 of 139 companies operating in Africa are company was not involved in extractive activities. incorporated in a jurisdiction that is considered a tax haven; Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, 717 ASX listed mining, oil and gas companies Guernsey, and Hong Kong. formed the final data set for analysis. There was no way to confirm the figures against Those 717 companies have an operating or official Australian Government data as the exploration presence in 106 countries globally. Australian Government either did not have this data or did not make it public. The African continent had the highest regional concentration of ASX listed companies with Outdated or absent data severely inhibited 139 companies with 312 projects in 34 the data collection required for this report. African nations. The ASX also does not allow linking, reproducing This equates to almost 1 in 5 ASX listed or scraping of any information uploaded by a extractives companies (19.3%) being present company to its site, making the data available on over 60% of the African continent.
    [Show full text]
  • Orca Gol 2017 Ann April 24, Ld Inc. Nual Informa 2018 Ation Form
    Orca Gold Inc. 2017 Annual Information Form April 24, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTENTS ITEM 1 - INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 5 ITEM 2 - CORPORATE STRUCTURE ...................................................................................................... 7 ITEM 3 - GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS ................................................................... 9 ITEM 4 - DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS ........................................................................................ 12 Stage of Development in Sudan .............................................................................................................. 12 Stage of Development in Côte d'Ivoire ................................................................................................... 12 Block 14 Project – Republic of Sudan .................................................................................................... 17 Exploration Assets - Côte d'Ivoire .......................................................................................................... 30 ITEM 5 – DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND DIVIDENDS ......................................... 34 ITEM 6 - MARKET FOR SECURITIES ................................................................................................... 35 ITEM 7 - ESCROWED SECURITIES ....................................................................................................... 36 ITEM 8 -
    [Show full text]
  • Region Du Bere
    REGION DU BERE LOCALITE DEPARTEMENT REGION POPULATION SYNTHESE SYNTHESE SYNTHESE COUVERTURE 2G COUVERTURE 3G COUVERTURE 4G AGBAOU KOUNAHIRI BERE 1228 ASSÉYAOKRO KOUNAHIRI BERE 799 BABADOUGOU MANKONO BERE 443 BADA MANKONO BERE 2797 BAGAO MANKONO BERE 1843 BAHITIPLA KOUNAHIRI BERE 730 BAKOPLA KOUNAHIRI BERE 948 BALÉPLA KOUNAHIRI BERE 559 BALLADOUGOU DIANRA BERE 607 BAMANASSO MANKONO BERE 1271 BAMBALOUMA KOUNAHIRI BERE 2559 BANANGORO MANKONO BERE 816 BAPLA KOUNAHIRI BERE 756 BARADOUGOU DIERRÉ MANKONO BERE 1361 BARADOUGOU-DIEMBA MANKONO BERE 424 BARANDAKORO MANKONO BERE 576 BASSAPLA KOUNAHIRI BERE 210 BÉBÉDOUGOU DIANRA BERE 164 BIÉLOU CARREFOUR MANKONO BERE 4405 BIKASSI MANKONO BERE 1177 BLIPLA KOUNAHIRI BERE 1270 BOAKA KOUNAHIRI BERE 3739 BOBOSSO-TIÉNIGBÉ MANKONO BERE 8732 BOMASSAPLA KOUNAHIRI BERE 597 BONASSO MANKONO BERE 310 BOROHOULÉMA MANKONO BERE 815 REGION DU BERE BOROZOMBA MANKONO BERE 430 BOUANDOUGOU MANKONO BERE 10542 BOUGOUNOU MANKONO BERE 967 BOURÉBO KOUNAHIRI BERE 835 BOUROUNON KOUNAHIRI BERE 2335 BOYAOKRO KOUNAHIRI BERE 3304 BRAHIMA MANKONO BERE 2866 BROKODALLAN MANKONO BERE 1274 CISSÉDOUGOU DIANRA BERE 302 DABAKALATOU MANKONO BERE 745 DALAGBÈ DIANRA BERE 1451 DANDOUGOU MANKONO BERE 3087 DANGBASSO MANKONO BERE 568 DANTOGO MANKONO BERE 1094 DAWALA MANKONO BERE 2242 DIAKOBOU MANKONO BERE 1141 DIALAKORO MANKONO BERE 6927 DIANRA DIANRA BERE 25880 DIANRA-VILLAGE DIANRA BERE 10822 DIARALA MANKONO BERE 956 DIARRADOUGOU DIANRA BERE 432 DIÉDOUGOU MANKONO BERE 486 DIEMBÉ DIANRA BERE 575 DIÉNÉDJAN MANKONO BERE 2732 DIÉTIGUISSO MANKONO
    [Show full text]