DOCSLIB.ORG

A Tree Extension for Conll-RDF

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Tree Extension for Conll-RDF Proceedings of the 12th Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2020), pages 7161–7169 Marseille, 11–16 May 2020 c European Language Resources Association (ELRA), licensed under CC-BY-NC A Tree Extension for CoNLL-RDF Christian Chiarcos, Luis Glaser Applied Computational Linguistics Lab (ACoLi) Goethe University Frankfurt, Germany fchiarcos, [email protected] Abstract The technological bridges between knowledge graphs and natural language processing are of utmost importance for the future development of language technology. CoNLL-RDF is a technology that provides such a bridge for popular one-word-per-line formats with tab-separated values (TSV) that are widely used in NLP (e.g., the CoNLL Shared Tasks), annotation (Universal Dependencies, Unimorph), corpus linguistics (Corpus WorkBench, CWB) and digital lexicography (SketchEngine): Every empty-line separated table (usually a sentence) is parsed into an graph, can be freely manipulated and enriched using standard graph technology, and then be serialized back into in a TSV format, RDF or other formats. An important limitation is that CoNLL-RDF provides native support for word-level annotations only. This does include dependency syntax and semantic role annotations, but neither phrase structures nor text structure. We describe the extension of the CoNLL-RDF technology stack for two vocabulary extensions of CoNLL-TSV, the bracket notation used in earlier CoNLL Shared Tasks and the extension with XML markup elements featured by CWB and SketchEngine. In order to represent the necessary extensions of the CoNLL vocabulary in an adequate fashion, we employ the POWLA vocabulary for representing and navigating in tree structures. Keywords: linguistic annotation, data formats, interoperability, tab-separated values, RDF, graphs, trees, CoNLL-RDF, POWLA 1. Introduction & Motivation ferred to as ‘CoNLL-TSV’, e.g., the CoNLL-U format of Since their original conception in the early 1990s, one- the Universal Dependencies. Here, we follow this con- word-per-line formats, mostly based on tab-separated val- vention in describing all one-word-per-line TSV formats as ues (TSV), have become enormously influential in cor- CoNLL-TSV. pus linguistics (Evert and Hardie, 2011, Corpus Work- Chiarcos and Fath¨ (2017) introduced the CoNLL-RDF li- bench/CWB),1 digital lexicography (Kilgarriff et al., 2014, brary, which allows to transform any CoNLL-TSV format SketchEngine),2 natural language processing (Schmid, into an isomorphic graph representation in RDF, to flex- 1994, TreeTagger), and as exchange format of various an- ibly transform it with SPARQL-Update, to enrich it with notation projects (Universal Dependencies (Nivre et al., external ontologies and knowledge bases, and to serialize 2016), PropBank, UniMorph).3 The main reasons for their it in a canonical format, in any RDF serialization (RD- continuing popularity are the apparent simplicity of tables F/XML, Turtle, JSON-LD), a graphical representation (us- and tab-separated values, and their expressive power that ing GraphViz/Dot) or back into a CoNLL-TSV representa- allows for the flexible and seamless extension of annota- tion. This transformation is generic and applicable to any tions with additional columns and novel annotations, mak- TSV format as it uses user-provided column labels to pro- ing these formats capable of expressing and combining duce properties (labeled edges) that hold the various anno- any kind of word-level annotation in a compact, human- tations. The only data structures it enforces are word (row) readable, and machine-processable format. and sentence (empty-line separated group of rows), as well Yet another factor contributing to the popularity of TSV for- as conll:HEAD, a property that links a word with its par- mats in natural language processing is their application as ent (in dependency annotation), resp., the (virtual root of exchange and evaluation format(s) of the Shared Tasks of the) sentence. Beyond that, CoNLL-RDF is semantically the SIGNLL Conference on Computational Natural Lan- shallow and its annotation properties are not backed by an guage Learning (CoNLL)4, conducted annually since 1999. ontology. However, using SPARQL Update, CoNLL-RDF With CoNLL data sets as an important basis for future eval- data can be flexibly transformed into a proper Linked Data uation of most NLP tasks, their formats are supported by representation and linked with external ontologies. most existing NLP tools, and various CoNLL-TSV formats The canonical CoNLL-RDF format is a fragment of RD- (‘dialects’) have seen a steady increase in popularity for F/Turtle that emulates the original TSV formats by putting linguistic data in NLP applications since. Even when cre- one word (with its annotations) in one line, and separating ated independently from CoNLL Shared Tasks, novel TSV sentences with an empty line. However, whereas CoNLL- formats following CoNLL conventions are now usually re- TSV is a tabular format, the canonical CoNLL-RDF format uses explicit property names (comparable to a Python dic- ∗ The authors contributed equally to the submission. 1 tionary or Java hashtable) as its data structure. Aside from http://cwb.sourceforge.net/ providing RDF output, we also provide transformation back 2http://www.sketchengine.eu into CoNLL for further processing of its annotations with 3http://universaldependencies.org/, conventional NLP pipelines and libraries. http://propbank.github.io/, http://unimorph. github.io/ Despite its popularity and wide use, CoNLL-TSV is lim- 4http://www.signll.org/conll ited in its expressivity: It imposes constraints on the type 7161 #ID WORD LEMMA UPOS POS FEATS HEAD EDGE 1 James James PROPN NNP Number=Sing 2 name are delimited with a new line. There are different CoNLL 2 Baker Baker PROPN NNP Number=Sing 3 nsubj 3 told tell VERB VBD Mood=Ind|... 0 root dialects, that each represent different information in these 4 reporters reporter NOUN NNS Number=Plur 3 obj columns. 5 Friday Friday PROPN NNP Number=Sing 3 nmod:tmod 6 : : PUNCT : _ 3 punct Fig. 1 depicts an example representation of such a data for- mat, the CoNLL-U format used in the context of the Uni- versal Dependencies initiative, with the last two columns Figure 1: Example of CoNLL-U annotation (DEPS and DEPS and MISC omitted. The column names are given in MISC columns omitted) the first comment line, which is lead by a hash mark. The ID column contains a sentence wide identifier, WORD rep- of linguistic annotation it captures. Indeed, CoNLL-TSV resents the form, LEMMA the lemma, UPOS the POS-tag is ideally suited for word-level annotations such as part-of- in the UD tagset, the POS column contains any language speech tags or syntactic dependencies, it can be extended specific speech tag, FEATS contains morphosyntactic fea- to the annotation of non-recursive spans (using the IOBES tures encoded as key-value pairs with a pipe (‘j’) as delim- scheme) and semantic roles (by adding one argument col- iter. The HEAD column points to the ID of the parent in the umn per predicate), but the format provides no native sup- dependency tree, with 0 representing the root. Finally, the port for phrase-level annotations, text structure or annota- EDGE column carries the label of the dependency relation tions beyond single sentences. CoNLL-RDF does not im- that holds between a word and its head, resp., the (virtual 5 pose such restrictions, but allows to create and to process root of the) sentence. arbitrary graph data structures, for example, for parsing CoNLL-U only represents one specific CoNLL dialect, but topological fields in Middle High German (Chiarcos et al., is supported by most multilingual dependency parsers – 2018), or for the creation of syntactic-semantic annotations as these are usually trained on UD data. Fig. 1 shows a in the context of Role and Reference Grammar (Chiarcos slightly simplified example from the OntoNotes (Hovy et and Fath,¨ 2019). However, as its vocabulary is grounded in al., 2006) wsj-0655 file, with annotations subsequently CoNLL-TSV, CoNLL-RDF does not specify datatypes for provided by the authors. Other dialects omit, reorder or trees and directed graphs not grounded in individual words, complement these columns with additional content. All nor does the CoNLL-RDF package parse or serialize such of them share the general advantages of this format: They annotations. enjoy widespread integration in existing NLP technology, In this paper we introduce the extensions we made to the they are easy to read and can be transformed and read with- CoNLL-RDF library to natively support tree-like annota- out a lot of overhead. tions. Using the POWLA vocabulary (Chiarcos, 2012c), we model an annotation graph independent of the sentence 2.2. From TSV to Annotation Graphs and word structure imposed by CoNLL. In this way, we can Being easily processable, interpretable and extensible, tab- even represent generic linguistic annotations that go beyond ular data structures in TSV formats are popular and effec- token-level annotation e.g. for usage in spoken discourse. tive for word-level annotations. They are also capable of We will first revisit the original concept and functionality representing other annotations, e.g., dependency relations of the CoNLL-RDF libraries. Second, this paper will de- between words by means of coindexing (between HEAD scribe a number of one-word-per-line TSV dialects with and ID columns in Fig. 1). But while TSV formats can be extensions for tree structures. We show that CoNLL-RDF trivially parsed into tables (two-dimensional arrays), such was only partially able to represent them, and incapable of tables are less than ideal for querying or manipulating graph processing them effectively. We then explain how we com- structures. With the following listing, we show how to re- plement the CoNLL-RDF vocabulary with generic linguis- trieve the lemmas of all subject arguments of the root nodes tic data structures from the POWLA vocabulary (Chiarcos, of a sentence in Java, using a two-dimensional array: 2012c), and we describe the extensions of the CoNLL-RDF libraries to parse tree annotations, to process and to produce String[][] sentence; // 2-dimensional array such data structures.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Arabic Corpus and Word Sketches
    Journal of King Saud University – Computer and Information Sciences (2014) 26, 357–371 King Saud University Journal of King Saud University – Computer and Information Sciences www.ksu.edu.sa www.sciencedirect.com arTenTen: Arabic Corpus and Word Sketches Tressy Arts a, Yonatan Belinkov b, Nizar Habash c,*, Adam Kilgarriff d, Vit Suchomel e,d a Chief Editor Oxford Arabic Dictionary, UK b MIT, USA c New York University Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates d Lexical Computing Ltd, UK e Masaryk Univ., Czech Republic Available online 7 October 2014 KEYWORDS Abstract We present arTenTen, a web-crawled corpus of Arabic, gathered in 2012. arTenTen con- Corpora; sists of 5.8-billion words. A chunk of it has been lemmatized and part-of-speech (POS) tagged with Lexicography; the MADA tool and subsequently loaded into Sketch Engine, a leading corpus query tool, where it Morphology; is open for all to use. We have also created ‘word sketches’: one-page, automatic, corpus-derived Concordance; summaries of a word’s grammatical and collocational behavior. We use examples to demonstrate Arabic what the corpus can show us regarding Arabic words and phrases and how this can support lexi- cography and inform linguistic research. The article also presents the ‘sketch grammar’ (the basis for the word sketches) in detail, describes the process of building and processing the corpus, and considers the role of the corpus in additional research on Arabic. Ó 2014 Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of King Saud University. 1. Introduction ber of the TenTen Corpus Family (Jakubı´cˇek et al., 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • MASC: the Manually Annotated Sub-Corpus of American English
    MASC: The Manually Annotated Sub-Corpus of American English Nancy Ide*, Collin Baker**, Christiane Fellbaum†, Charles Fillmore**, Rebecca Passonneau†† *Vassar College Poughkeepsie, New York USA **International Computer Science Institute Berkeley, California USA †Princeton University Princeton, New Jersey USA ††Columbia University New York, New York USA E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract To answer the critical need for sharable, reusable annotated resources with rich linguistic annotations, we are developing a Manually Annotated Sub-Corpus (MASC) including texts from diverse genres and manual annotations or manually-validated annotations for multiple levels, including WordNet senses and FrameNet frames and frame elements, both of which have become significant resources in the international computational linguistics community. To derive maximal benefit from the semantic information provided by these resources, the MASC will also include manually-validated shallow parses and named entities, which will enable linking WordNet senses and FrameNet frames within the same sentences into more complex semantic structures and, because named entities will often be the role fillers of FrameNet frames, enrich the semantic and pragmatic information derivable from the sub-corpus. All MASC annotations will be published with detailed inter-annotator agreement measures. The MASC and its annotations will be freely downloadable from the ANC website, thus providing
    [Show full text]
  • Jazykovedný Ústav Ľudovíta Štúra
    JAZYKOVEDNÝ ÚSTAV ĽUDOVÍTA ŠTÚRA SLOVENSKEJ AKADÉMIE VIED 2 ROČNÍK 70, 2019 JAZYKOVEDNÝ ČASOPIS ________________________________________________________________VEDEcKÝ ČASOPIS PRE OTáZKY TEóRIE JAZYKA JOURNAL Of LINGUISTIcS ScIENTIfIc JOURNAL fOR ThE Theory Of LANGUAGE ________________________________________________________________ hlavná redaktorka/Editor-in-chief: doc. Mgr. Gabriela Múcsková, PhD. Výkonní redaktori/Managing Editors: PhDr. Ingrid Hrubaničová, PhD., Mgr. Miroslav Zumrík, PhD. Redakčná rada/Editorial Board: PhDr. Klára Buzássyová, CSc. (Bratislava), prof. PhDr. Juraj Dolník, DrSc. (Bratislava), PhDr. Ingrid Hrubaničová, PhD. (Bra tislava), doc. Mgr. Martina Ivanová, PhD. (Prešov), Mgr. Nicol Janočková, PhD. (Bratislava), Mgr. Alexandra Jarošová, CSc. (Bratislava), prof. PaedDr. Jana Kesselová, CSc. (Prešov), PhDr. Ľubor Králik, CSc. (Bratislava), PhDr. Viktor Krupa, DrSc. (Bratislava), doc. Mgr. Gabriela Múcsková, PhD. (Bratislava), Univ. Prof. Mag. Dr. Stefan Michael Newerkla (Viedeň – Ra- kúsko), Associate Prof. Mark Richard Lauersdorf, Ph.D. (Kentucky – USA), prof. Mgr. Martin Ološtiak, PhD. (Prešov), prof. PhDr. Slavomír Ondrejovič, DrSc. (Bratislava), prof. PaedDr. Vladimír Patráš, CSc. (Banská Bystrica), prof. PhDr. Ján Sabol, DrSc. (Košice), prof. PhDr. Juraj Vaňko, CSc. (Nitra), Mgr. Miroslav Zumrík, PhD. (Bratislava), prof. PhDr. Pavol Žigo, CSc. (Bratislava). Technický_______________________________________________________________ redaktor/Technical editor: Mgr. Vladimír Radik Vydáva/Published by: Jazykovedný
    [Show full text]
  • Korpusleksikograafia Uued Võimalused Eesti Keele Kollokatsioonisõnastiku Näitel
    doi:10.5128/ERYa11.05 korpuSLekSikograafia uued võimaLuSed eeSti keeLe koLLokatSiooniSõnaStiku näiteL Jelena Kallas, Kristina Koppel, Maria Tuulik Ülevaade. Artiklis tutvustame korpusleksikograafia üldisi arengu- tendentse ja uusi meetodeid. Käsitleme korpuse kui leksikograafilise 11, 75–94 EESTI RAKENDUSLINGVISTIKA ÜHINGU AASTARAAMAT info allika potentsiaali ning analüüsime, kuidas saab leksikograafilisi andmebaase pool- ja täisautomaatselt genereerida. Vaatleme, mil määral on uusi tehnoloogilisi lahendusi võimalik rakendada Eesti õppe- leksikograafias, täpsemalt eesti keele kollokatsioonisõnastiku (KOLS) koostamisel. KOLS on esimene eestikeelne sõnastik, kus rakendatakse andmebaasi automaatset genereerimist nii märksõnastiku kui ka sõnaartikli sisu (kollokatiivse info ja näitelausete) tasandil. Tutvustame sõnastiku koostamise üldisi põhimõtteid ja esitame näidisartikli.* Võtmesõnad: korpusleksikograafia, kollokatsioonisõnastik, korpus- päringusüsteem, sõnastikusüsteem, eesti keel 1. Sõnastike korpuspõhine koostamine internetiajastul: vahendid ja meetodid Korpusleksikograafia eesmärk on luua meetodid, mis võimaldaksid leksikograafilisi üksusi automaatselt tuvastada ja valida. Korpusanalüüsi tulemusi rakendatakse tänapäeval märksõnastiku loomisel, tähendusjaotuste uurimisel, leksikaalsete üksuste erinevate omaduste tuvastamisel (süntaktiline käitumine, kollokatsioonid, semantiline prosoodia eri tüüpi tekstides, leksikaal-semantilised suhted), näitelau- sete valikul ja tõlkevastete leidmisel (Kilgarriff 2013: 77). Korpuspõhine koostamine
    [Show full text]
  • Background and Context for CLASP
    Background and Context for CLASP Nancy Ide, Vassar College The Situation Standards efforts have been on-going for over 20 years Interest and activity mainly in Europe in 90’s and early 2000’s Text Encoding Initiative (TEI) – 1987 Still ongoing, used mainly by humanities EAGLES/ISLE Developed standards for morpho-syntax, syntax, sub-categorization, etc. (links on CLASP wiki) Corpus Encoding Standard (now XCES - http://www.xces.org) Main Aspects" ! Harmonization of formats for linguistic data and annotations" ! Harmonization of descriptors in linguistic annotation" ! These two are often mixed, but need to deal with them separately (see CLASP wiki)" Formats: The Past 20 Years" 1987 TEI Myriad of formats 1994 MULTEXT, CES ~1996 XML 2000 ISO TC37 SC4 2001 LAF model introduced now LAF/GrAF, ISO standards Myriad of formats Actually…" ! Things are better now" ! XML use" ! Moves toward common models, especially in Europe" ! US community seeing the need for interoperability " ! Emergence of common processing platforms (GATE, UIMA) with underlying common models " Resources 1990 ! WordNet gains ground as a “standard” LR ! Penn Treebank, Wall Street Journal Corpus World Wide Web ! British National Corpus ! EuroWordNet XML ! Comlex ! FrameNet ! American National Corpus Semantic Web ! Global WordNet ! More FrameNets ! SUMO ! VerbNet ! PropBank, NomBank ! MASC present NLP software 1994 ! MULTEXT > LT tools, LT XML 1995 ! GATE (Sheffield) 1996 1998 ! Alembic Workbench ! ATLAS (NIST) 2003 ! What happened to this? 200? ! Callisto ! UIMA Now: GATE
    [Show full text]
  • The Translation Equivalents Database (Treq) As a Lexicographer’S Aid
    The Translation Equivalents Database (Treq) as a Lexicographer’s Aid Michal Škrabal, Martin Vavřín Institute of the Czech National Corpus, Charles University, Czech Republic E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract The aim of this paper is to introduce a tool that has recently been developed at the Institute of the Czech National Corpus, the Treq (Translation Equivalents) database, and to explore its possible uses, especially in the field of lexicography. Equivalent candidates offered by Treq can also be considered as potential equivalents in a bilingual dictionary (we will focus on the Latvian–Czech combination in this paper). Lexicographers instantly receive a list of candidates for target language counterparts and their frequencies (expressed both in absolute numbers and percentages) that suggest the probability that a given candidate is functionally equivalent. A significant advantage is the possibility to click on any one of these candidates and immediately verify their individual occurrences in a given context; and thus more easily distinguish the relevant translation candidates from the misleading ones. This utility, which is based on data stored in the InterCorp parallel corpus, is continually being upgraded and enriched with new functions (the recent integration of multi-word units, adding English as the primary language of the dictionaries, an improved interface, etc.), and the accuracy of the results is growing as the volume of data keeps increasing. Keywords: InterCorp; Treq; translation equivalents; alignment; Latvian–Czech dictionary 1. Introduction The aim of this paper is to introduce one of the tools that has been developed recently at the Institute of the Czech National Corpus (ICNC) and which could be especially helpful to lexicographers: namely, the Treq translation equivalents database1.
    [Show full text]
  • ESP Corpus Construction: a Plea for a Needs-Driven Approach Bâtir Des Corpus En Anglais De Spécialité : Plaidoyer Pour Une Approche Fondée Sur L’Analyse Des Besoins
    ASp la revue du GERAS 68 | 2015 Varia ESP corpus construction: a plea for a needs-driven approach Bâtir des corpus en anglais de spécialité : plaidoyer pour une approche fondée sur l’analyse des besoins Hilary Nesi Electronic version URL: http://journals.openedition.org/asp/4682 DOI: 10.4000/asp.4682 ISSN: 2108-6354 Publisher Groupe d'étude et de recherche en anglais de spécialité Printed version Date of publication: 23 October 2015 Number of pages: 7-24 ISSN: 1246-8185 Electronic reference Hilary Nesi, « ESP corpus construction: a plea for a needs-driven approach », ASp [Online], 68 | 2015, Online since 01 November 2016, connection on 02 November 2020. URL : http:// journals.openedition.org/asp/4682 ; DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/asp.4682 This text was automatically generated on 2 November 2020. Tous droits réservés ESP corpus construction: a plea for a needs-driven approach 1 ESP corpus construction: a plea for a needs-driven approach Bâtir des corpus en anglais de spécialité : plaidoyer pour une approche fondée sur l’analyse des besoins Hilary Nesi 1. Introduction 1 A huge amount of corpus data is now available for English language teachers and learners, making it difficult for them to decide which kind of corpus is most suited to their needs. The corpora that they probably know best are the large, publicly accessible general corpora which inform general reference works and textbooks; the ones that aim to cover the English language as a whole and to represent many different categories of text. The 100 million word British National Corpus (BNC), created in the 1990s, is a famous example of this type and has been used extensively for language learning purposes, but at 100 million words it is too small to contain large numbers of texts within each of its subcomponents, and it is now too old to represent modern usage in the more fast-moving fields.
    [Show full text]
  • Informatics 1: Data & Analysis
    Informatics 1: Data & Analysis Lecture 12: Corpora Ian Stark School of Informatics The University of Edinburgh Friday 27 February 2015 Semester 2 Week 6 http://www.inf.ed.ac.uk/teaching/courses/inf1/da Student Survey Final Day ! ESES: The Edinburgh Student Experience Survey http://www.ed.ac.uk/students/surveys Please log on to MyEd before 1 March to complete the survey. Help guide what we do at the University of Edinburgh, improving your future experience here and that of the students to follow. Ian Stark Inf1-DA / Lecture 12 2015-02-27 Lecture Plan XML We start with technologies for modelling and querying semistructured data. Semistructured Data: Trees and XML Schemas for structuring XML Navigating and querying XML with XPath Corpora One particular kind of semistructured data is large bodies of written or spoken text: each one a corpus, plural corpora. Corpora: What they are and how to build them Applications: corpus analysis and data extraction Ian Stark Inf1-DA / Lecture 12 2015-02-27 Homework ! Tutorial Exercises Tutorial 5 exercises went online earlier this week. In these you use the xmllint command-line tool to check XML validity and run your own XPath queries. Reading T. McEnery and A. Wilson. Corpus Linguistics. Second edition, Edinburgh University Press, 2001. Chapter 2: What is a corpus and what is in it? (§2.2.2 optional) Photocopied handout, also available from the ITO. Ian Stark Inf1-DA / Lecture 12 2015-02-27 Remote Access to DICE ! Much coursework can be done on your own machines, but sometimes it’s important to be able to connect to and use DICE systems.
    [Show full text]
  • The Expanding Horizons of Corpus Analysis
    The expanding horizons of corpus analysis Brian MacWhinney Carnegie Mellon University Abstract By including a focus on multimedia interactions linked to transcripts, corpus linguistics can vastly expand its horizons. This expansion will rely on two continuing developments. First, we need to develop easily used methods for each of the ten analytic methods we have examined, including lexical analyses, QDA (qualitative data analysis), automatic tagging, language profiles, group comparisons, change scores, error analysis, feedback studies, conversation analysis, and modeling. Second, we need to work together to construct a unified database for language studies and related sciences. This database must be grounded on the principles of open access, data-sharing, interoperability, and integrated structure. It must provide powerful tools for searching, multilinguality, and multimedia analysis. If we can build this infrastructure, we will be able to explore more deeply the key questions underlying the structure and functioning of language, as it emerges from the intermeshing of processes operative on eight major timeframes. 1. Introduction Corpus linguistics has benefitted greatly from continuing advances in computer and Internet hardware and software. These advances have made it possible to develop facilities such as BNCweb (bncweb.lancs.ac.uk), LDC (Linguistic Data Consortium) online, the American National Corpus (americannationalcorpus. org), TalkBank (talkbank.org), and CHILDES (childes.psy.cmu.edu). In earlier periods, these corpora were limited to written and transcribed materials. However, most newer corpora now include transcripts linked to either audio or video recordings. The development of this newer corpus methodology is facilitated by technology which makes it easy to produce high-quality video recordings of face-to-face interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • A Corpus-Based Study of the Effects of Collocation, Phraseology
    A CORPUS-BASED STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF COLLOCATION, PHRASEOLOGY, GRAMMATICAL PATTERNING, AND REGISTER ON SEMANTIC PROSODY by TIMOTHY PETER MAIN A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of English Language and Applied Linguistics College of Arts and Law The University of Birmingham December 2017 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract This thesis investigates four factors that can significantly affect the positive-negative semantic prosody of two high-frequency verbs, CAUSE and HAPPEN. It begins by exploring the problematic notion that semantic prosody is collocational. Statistical measures of collocational significance, including the appropriate span within which evaluative collocates are observed, the nature of the collocates themselves, and their relationship to the node are all examined in detail. The study continues by examining several semi-preconstructed phrases associated with HAPPEN. First, corpus data show that such phrases often activate evaluative modes other than semantic prosody; then, the potentially problematic selection of the canonical form of a phrase is discussed; finally, it is shown that in some cases collocates ostensibly evincing semantic prosody occur in profiles because of their occurrence in frequent phrases, and as such do not constitute strong evidence of semantic prosody.
    [Show full text]
  • Machine Learning of Antonyms in English and Arabic Corpora
    Machine Learning of Antonyms in English and Arabic Corpora Luluh Basim M. Aldhubayi School of Computing University of Leeds Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy January 2019 2 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is her own, ex- cept where work which has formed part of jointly-authored pub- lications has been included. The contribution of the candidate and the other authors to this work has been explicitly indicated below. The candidate confirms that appropriate credit has been given within the thesis where reference has been made to the work of others. Parts of the work presented in Chapters 7 have been published in the following jointly-authored article: Al-Yahya, M., Al-Malak, S., Aldhubayi, L. (2016). Ontological Lexicon Enrichment: The Badea System For Semi-Automated Extraction Of Antonymy Relations From Arabic Language Corpora. Malaysian Journal of Computer Science, 29(1). This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copy- right material and that no quotation from the thesis may be pub- lished without proper acknowledgement. The right of Luluh Basim M. Aldhubayi to be identified as Au- thor of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. c 2019 The University of Leeds and Luluh Basim M. Aldhubayi to my favourite antonym pair Amal & Ahmed Acknowledgements First and foremost, all praise and thanks to Allah The Almighty for His graces and guidance. Peace and Blessings of Allah be upon the Prophet Muhammad. I would like to thank my supervisors, Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Better Web Corpora for Corpus Linguistics and NLP
    Masaryk University Faculty of Informatics Better Web Corpora For Corpus Linguistics And NLP Doctoral Thesis Vít Suchomel Brno, Spring 2020 Masaryk University Faculty of Informatics Better Web Corpora For Corpus Linguistics And NLP Doctoral Thesis Vít Suchomel Brno, Spring 2020 Declaration Hereby I declare that this paper is my original authorial work, which I have worked out on my own. All sources, references, and literature used or excerpted during elaboration of this work are properly cited and listed in complete reference to the due source. Vít Suchomel Advisor: Pavel Rychlý i Acknowledgements I would like to thank my advisors, prof. Karel Pala and prof. Pavel Rychlý for their problem insight, help with software design and con- stant encouragement. I am also grateful to my colleagues from Natural Language Process- ing Centre at Masaryk University and Lexical Computing, especially Miloš Jakubíček, Pavel Rychlý and Aleš Horák, for their support of my work and invaluable advice. Furthermore, I would like to thank Adam Kilgarriff, who gave me a wonderful opportunity to work for a leading company in the field of lexicography and corpus driven NLP and Jan Pomikálek who helped me to start. I thank to my wife Kateřina who supported me a lot during writing this thesis. Of those who have always accepted me and loved me in spite of my failures, God is the greatest. ii Abstract The internet is used by computational linguists, lexicographers and social scientists as an immensely large source of text data for various NLP tasks and language studies. Web corpora can be built in sizes which would be virtually impossible to achieve using traditional corpus creation methods.
    [Show full text]