DOCSLIB.ORG

Significant Habitats of the Town of East Fishkill, Dutchess County, New York

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Significant Habitats of the Town of East Fishkill, Dutchess County, New York SIGNIFICANT HABITATS OF THE TOWN OF EAST FISHKILL, DUTCHESS COUNTY, NEW YORK By Gretchen Stevens and Eben Broadbent Hudsonia Ltd. May 2002 1 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 1 Background ................................................................................. 1 What is biodiversity? ..................................................................... 3 What are “ecologically significant habitats?” ............................... 3 Why be concerned about biological diversity? ............................... 4 The study area ............................................................................... 4 METHODS ............................................................................................. 5 RESULTS ............................................................................................. 8 DISCUSSION .......................................................................................... 36 REFERENCES CITED .......................................................................... 49 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ..................................................................... 52 APPENDICES 1 Explanation of ranks for species of conservation concern .................... 53 2 Scientific names of plants mentioned in this report .............................. 55 FIGURES 1 Generalized bedrock geology of East Fishkill ................................ 42 2 Contiguous meadows 20 ha (50 ac) and larger ................................ 43 3 Contiguous forested areas 200 ha (500 ac) and larger .................... 44 4 Crest, ledge, and talus habitats ........................................................ 45 5 Fens and calcareous wet meadows ........................................................ 46 6 Kettle shrub pools ................................................................................ 47 7 Acidic bog, acidic bog lake, and circumneutral bog lakes ................... 48 2 INTRODUCTION Background In January 2001, Hudsonia embarked on a project to identify and map ecologically significant habitats throughout the Town of East Fishkill, Dutchess County, New York. The project grew out of our observations of the loss of important habitats and species in the region due to rapid land development. The publication of Hudsonia’s Biodiversity Assessment Manual for the Hudson River Estuary Corridor in 2001 provided another important impetus for the project. We wanted to conduct a pilot assessment project that would demonstrate the ways the Manual could be used to identify important biological resources and inform local communities about biodiversity conservation. We believe that if landowners, developers, public planners, and local officials have good information about biological resources, they will be better able to locate and design new development such that impacts to important and sensitive habitats are minimized or avoided. Hudsonia has been conducting small-scale, site-specific biological assessments in the Hudson Valley for many years, helping landowners, citizens’ groups, conservation organizations, developers, and public officials recognize some of the important habitats and species of conservation concern that are most at risk from poorly planned land development. Although many land use decisions are necessarily made parcel-by-parcel, it is apparent to us that the longterm viability of biological communities, habitats, and ecosystems cannot be protected on a piecemeal basis, but requires consideration of whole landscapes. For this reason, we think that local land use planning and decision-making would be improved if general biodiversity information were available for large areas, such as whole towns, watersheds, or counties. To this end, we designed a project to conduct a large-scale biodiversity assessment in southern Dutchess County, New York. Upon receiving a grant for the project from the Marilyn Milton Simpson Charitable Trusts, we sought a town with governing boards interested in having biodiversity information at their disposal to aid in town planning and land use decision-making. We found enthusiastic support for the project in the Conservation Advisory Council, the Town 3 Supervisor, and the Town Board of East Fishkill, and were pleased to make the town our study site. Eben Broadbent (Research Assistant) and Gretchen Stevens (Project Manager) conducted the work on this project during the period January 2001 through March 2002. Through map analysis and field observations we created a map of the habitats we consider to be the most ecologically significant in the Town of East Fishkill. Some of these habitats are themselves rare in the region, or are in danger of becoming rare in the near future. Others are not rare, but may support some of our rarest and most vulnerable species of plants and animals. Some provide especially important ecological services to other parts of the ecosystem. The habitat map was posted in the East Fishkill Town Hall in March 2002. This report briefly describes the habitats, discusses some aspects of their ecological importance, and discusses some conservation measures that can help to protect habitats and species of conservation concern. We conducted no rare species surveys in this study, and have neither identified nor mapped the known locations of rare species. We hope that the map and report will help local residents and landowners appreciate the biological richness of the areas where they live and work, and help town planners and decision- makers identify the areas of greatest ecological significance, develop conservation goals, and establish conservation policies and practices that will help protect biodiversity resources while serving other social, cultural, and economic needs of the human community. This report and map were prepared especially for use by the Conservation Advisory Council, the Planning Board, and the Town Board of East Fishkill. The Geographic Information System (GIS) database containing the habitat map data will be conveyed to the Town Assessor’s office. We have also given a copy of the report and the GIS database to the Dutchess County Environmental Management Council (EMC), and the Dutchess County Department of Planning and Development. 4 Hudsonia Ltd. is a non-advocacy, nonprofit, scientific research and education institute based in Annandale, New York. Hudsonia does not support or oppose development projects or land use changes, but conducts scientific studies to collect and analyze data and make recommendations for environmentally sound land management. These findings are provided impartially to those persons and organizations involved in public decision-making. What is biodiversity? The concept of biodiversity, or biological diversity, encompasses all of life and its processes. It includes ecosystems, biological communities, species, and their genes, as well as their interactions with each other and with the non-biological components of their environments, such as soil, water, air, and sunlight. Many ecologists agree that maintenance of native biodiversity is fundamental to the effective functioning of the ecosystems that sustain the human community and the living world around us. While biodiversity conservation efforts often focus on protection of certain rare or imperiled species, a species will be protected in the long term only if its habitats are maintained intact. The local or regional disappearance of a habitat can lead to the local or regional extinction of species that depend on the habitat. The focus of this project, therefore, is on habitats of special conservation concern. What are “ecologically significant habitats?” For purposes of this project, a “habitat” is simply the place where an organism or population lives or where a biological community occurs, and is described according to the biological and non-biological components of the environment. Habitats that we consider “ecologically significant” may be themselves rare or declining in the region, or they may support rare species and other species of conservation concern, or they may be unusual examples of otherwise common habitats, e.g., especially large, especially isolated from human activities, especially old, or lacking alien species, or they may provide connections between other important habitat units. 5 Why be concerned about biological diversity? Native biological diversity is one of the essential components of intact ecosystems. The very survival of the human community depends on the basic ecosystem services that make the earth habitable, such as climate moderation, oxygen production, soil formation, water and air purification, and production and decomposition of organic matter. While the value of these services is immense and probably incalculable, ecosystems also help to produce the extractable and harvestable natural resources that provide the materials on which our human economies are based. Diverse biological communities and ecosystems are also responsible for the richness of the natural landscapes around us that are so important for visual pleasure, recreation, inspiration, and spiritual solace. Although many of the common habitats of the Hudson Valley are extremely important to maintaining ecosystem functions, there are several reasons why our work often focuses on habitats and species that are rare or declining. Rare species, rare communities, and the habitats that support them are often in the greatest immediate danger of disappearing. The decline or disappearance of rare species
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Basking Habitat Characteristics of Blanding's Turtles in Natural And
    Basking Habitat Characteristics of Blanding’s Turtles in Natural and Constructed Wetlands in Southeastern New York Tanessa Hartwig, Erik Kiviat, and Gretchen Stevens Hudsonia Ltd., Annandale, NY Presentation 2008 Tanessa Hartwig Emys blandingii : NYS Threatened Species Threats in Dutchess County, NY: • roads, construction, farm equipment • habitat degradation and loss • landscape fragmentation and sprawl • subsidized predators • collecting BlandingBlanding ’’ss TurtleTurtle HabitatsHabitats inin DutchessDutchess CountyCounty Core Wetland Habitat: Deep-flooding shrub swamps with organic soil, near gravelly glacial outwash Associated Wetland Habitats: Drought Refuge: Vernal (woodland) pools, flooded swamps, Spring-fed natural or artificial ponds, or beaver ponds, other flooded wetlands deep pools in wetlands Estivation Habitat: Wetland sediments, upland woods under logs or in shrub thickets, stream pools ConstructedConstructed Habitats,Habitats, 19961996 --19971997 Moving Wetland Sods Loading sods on truck Spatula for cutting sods Sods and organic soil Placing sods in basin Inspiration for sod technique: Munro Ecological Services MethodsMethods • Turtle-centered plots May to September, 2000-2002, in constructed and natural wetlands • Turtles trapped and radios attached; turtles radiotracked to exact location • Vegetation, water temperature, and water depth recorded in a 3 x 3 m plot centered on the turtle • Vegetation surveyed in permanent random 3 x 3 m plots each September GeneralGeneral AssociationsAssociations • Shallow water depths
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Chester CPP Plan 3-26-19
    Community Preservation Plan Town of Chester, NY March 26, 2019 Committee Draft Prepared by the Town of Chester Community Preservation Plan Committee Prepared with technical assistance from: Planit Main Street, Inc. Preface The Town of Chester has long recognized that community planning is an ongoing process. In 2015, the Town Board adopted a Comprehensive Plan, which was an update of its 2003 Comprehensive Plan. The 2015 Comprehensive Plan recommended additional actions, plans and detailed studies to pursue the recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan. Among these were additional measures to protect natural resources, agricultural resources and open space. In September 2017, the Town Board appointed a Community Preservation Plan Committee (CPPC) to guide undertake the creation of the Town’s first Community Preservation Plan. This Community Preservation Plan is not a new departure - rather it incorporates and builds upon the recommendations of the Town’s adopted 2015 Comprehensive Plan and its existing land use regulations. i Acknowledgements The 2017 Community Preservation Plan (CPP) Steering Committee acknowledges the extraordinary work of the 2015 Comprehensive Plan Committee in creating the Town’s 2015 Comprehensive Plan. Chester Town Board Hon. Alex Jamieson, Supervisor Robert Valentine - Deputy Supervisor Brendan W. Medican - Councilman Cynthia Smith - Councilwomen Ryan C. Wensley – Councilman Linda Zappala, Town Clerk Clifton Patrick, Town Historian Town of Chester Community Preservation Plan Committee (CPPC) NAME TITLE Donald Serotta Chairman Suzanne Bellanich Member Tim Diltz Member Richard Logothetis Member Tracy Schuh Member Robert Valentine Member Consultant Alan J. Sorensen, AICP, Planit Main Street, Inc. ii Contents 1.0 Introduction, Purpose and Summary .............................................................................................. 4 2.0 Community Preservation Target Areas, Projects, Parcels and Priorities .....................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogeologic Data Update for the Stratified-Drift Aquifer in the Sprout and Fishkill Creek Valleys, Dutchess County, New York
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Prepared in cooperation with the SCIENTIFIC INVESTIGATIONS MAP 3136 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION Saturated thickness of the surficial aquifer - SHEET 4 of 4 Reynolds, R.J., and Calef, F.J., III., 2010, Hydrogeologic data update for the stratified-drift aquifer in the Sprout and Fishkill Creek valleys, Dutchess County, New York 73°55' 73°50' 73°45' 41°45' 80˚ 79˚ 78˚ 77˚ 76˚ 75˚ 74˚ 73˚ 72˚ 45˚ CANADA 44˚ Lake Ontario VERMONT NEW 43˚ NEW YORK HAMPSHIRE Lake Erie MASSACHUSETTS 42˚ DUTCHESS COUNTY CONNECTICUT PENNSYLVANIA osg Study area 41˚ NEW 0 25 50 75 100 MILES JERSEY Atlantic 0 25 50 75 100 KILOMETERS Ocean osg t/r t/r EXPLANATION osg Saturated thickness of surficial aquifer, in feet t/r 0 to 10 0 to 10 ft osg 0 to 20 al 0 to 10 ft al 0 to 40 ksg 40 to 100 100 to 180 al ksg ksg Till or bedrock hill—surrounded by aquifer 0 to 20 ft osg Aquifer boundary—Denotes boundary between unconsolidated ksg deposits that comprise the Sprout and Fishkill Creeks aquifer and adjacent deposits of till and bedrock Limit of mapped area—Indicates arbitrary truncation of mapped area Surficial geologic boundary—Denotes boundary between adjacent ksg surficial geologic units. Surficial geologic units explained on Sheet 2 ksg al t/r t/r ksg Saturated Thickness of the Surficial Aquifer ksg col/ksg Sheet 4 shows the estimated saturated thickness of the surficial sand and gravel aquifer in the Sprout Creek-Fishkill Creek t/r study area.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Context Dependence for Understanding the Effects of Low-flow Events on fish
    The importance of context dependence for understanding the effects of low-flow events on fish Annika W. Walters1,2 1US Geological Survey, Wyoming Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Department of Zoology and Physiology, 1000 East University Avenue, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming 82071 USA Abstract: The natural hydrology of streams and rivers has been extensively altered by dam construction, water diversion, and climate change. An increased frequency of low-flow events will affect fish by changing habitat availability, resource availability, and reproductive cues. I reviewed the literature to characterize the approaches taken to assess low-flow events and fish, the main effects of low-flow events on fish, and the associated mechanistic drivers. Most studies are focused on temperate streams and are comparative in nature. Decreased stream flow is associated with decreased survival, growth, and abundance of fish populations and shifts in community composition, but effects are variable. This variability in effects is probably caused by context dependence. I propose 3 main sources of context dependence that drive the variation in fish responses to low-flow events: attributes of the low-flow event, attributes of the habitat, and attributes of the fish. Awareness of these sources of context dependence can help managers interpret and explain data, predict vulnerability of fish communities, and prioritize appropriate management actions. Key words: drought, disturbance, hydrology, prioritization, stream flow, variability Low-flow events are increasing in frequency because of associated mechanistic drivers. The objective is to provide human alteration of streamflow regimes through dams insight into why previous investigators have had difficulty and water diversion and natural and human-induced cli- finding general transferrable relationships between de- mate shifts (Barnett et al.
    [Show full text]
  • FISHKILLISHKILL Mmilitaryilitary Ssupplyupply Hubhub Ooff Thethe Aamericanmerican Rrevolutionevolution
    Staples® Print Solutions HUNRES_1518351_BRO01 QA6 1234 CYANMAGENTAYELLOWBLACK 06/6/2016 This material is based upon work assisted by a grant from the Department of Interior, National Park Service. Any opinions, fi ndings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily refl ect the views of the Department of the Interior. FFISHKILLISHKILL MMilitaryilitary SSupplyupply HHubub ooff tthehe AAmericanmerican RRevolutionevolution 11776-1783776-1783 “...the principal depot of Washington’s army, where there are magazines, hospitals, workshops, etc., which form a town of themselves...” -Thomas Anburey 1778 Friends of the Fishkill Supply Depot A Historical Overview www.fi shkillsupplydepot.org Cover Image: Spencer Collection, New York Public Library. Designed and Written by Hunter Research, Inc., 2016 “View from Fishkill looking to West Point.” Funded by the American Battlefi eld Protection Program Th e New York Public Library Digital Collections. 1820. Staples® Print Solutions HUNRES_1518351_BRO01 QA6 5678 CYANMAGENTAYELLOWBLACK 06/6/2016 Fishkill Military Supply Hub of the American Revolution In 1777, the British hatched a scheme to capture not only Fishkill but the vital Fishkill Hudson Valley, which, if successful, would sever New England from the Mid- Atlantic and paralyze the American cause. The main invasion force, under Gen- eral John Burgoyne, would push south down the Lake Champlain corridor from Distribution Hub on the Hudson Canada while General Howe’s troops in New York advanced up the Hudson. In a series of missteps, Burgoyne overestimated the progress his army could make On July 9, 1776, New York’s Provincial Congress met at White Plains creating through the forests of northern New York, and Howe deliberately embarked the State of New York and accepting the Declaration of Independence.
    [Show full text]
  • Hudson River Estuary Program Report on 15 Years of Progress Helping People Enjoy, Protect and Revitalize the Hudson River Estuary and Its Valley
    Hudson River Estuary Program Report on 15 Years of Progress Helping people enjoy, protect and revitalize the Hudson River Estuary and its Valley Clean Water * Habitat * River Access * Climate Change * Scenery NYS Department of Environmental Conservation in partnership with: Andrew M. Cuomo, Governor NYS Department of State Joseph Martens, Commissioner NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation NYS Department of Health March 2011 NYS Office of General Services Hudson River Valley Greenway US Environmental Protection Agency National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration US Department of Interior Dear Friend of the Hudson: Since 1987, the Hudson River Estuary Program (HREP) has been changing the way New York State manages the river and the valley environment. Significant public participation guided the development of our first Action Agenda, adopted in 1996, which enabled a new, comprehensive approach. Now 15 years later, we are: • Coordinating among local, state and federal agencies to achieve shared goals; • Using science and technology to solve river problems; • Building the capacity for local stewardship of natural resources; • Helping people discover the river; and • Building a network for regional cooperation. This report is a snapshot of what the Estuary Program and its partners have been doing for the last 15 years. It shows how we are supporting the quality of life of people and improving the future health and vitality of the natural resources of the Hudson River and its valley. The report begins with the four “Estuary Action Agendas” that have been issued and implemented since 1996. Built on sound science and extensive public input, these Action Agendas have set clear goals and targets for progress that can be objectively measured.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Fish and Wildlife Rating Form
    COASTAL FISH AND WILDLIFE RATING FORM Name of area: Moodna Creek Designated: November 15, 1987 Revised: August 15, 2012 County: Orange Town(s): Cornwall, New Windsor 7.5’ Quadrangles: Cornwall, NY Assessment Criteria Score Ecosystem Rarity (ER) -- the uniqueness of the plant and animal community in the area and the physical, structural and chemical features supporting this community. ER Assessment - A major freshwater tributaries of the lower Hudson River that is accessible 16 to coastal migratory fishes; includes the largest tidal marsh in Orange County. Species Vulnerability (SV) – the degree of vulnerability throughout its range in New York State of a species residing in the ecosystem or utilizing the ecosystem for its survival. SV Assessment –Least bittern (T), bald eagle (T), American bittern (SC) 41.5 Additive division: 25 + 25/2 + 16/4 = Human Use (HU) -- the conduct of significant, demonstrable commercial, recreational, or educational wildlife-related human use, either consumptive or non-consumptive, in the area or directly dependent upon the area. HU Assessment -- Recreational fishing opportunities attract many Orange County anglers, 4 paddlers, and nature observers to the area. Population Level (PL) – the concentration of a species in the area during its normal, recurring period of occurrence, regardless of the length of that period of occurrence. PL Assessment -- Concentrations of various wetland wildlife species and coastal migratory 9 fishes in this area are unusual in Orange County and the Hudson Valley Region. Replaceability (R) – ability to replace the area, either on or off site, with an equivalent replacement for the same fish and wildlife and uses of those same fish and wildlife, for the same users of those fish and wildlife.
    [Show full text]
  • HUDSON RIVER RISING Riverkeeper Leads a Growing Movement to Protect the Hudson
    Confronting climate | Restoring nature | Building resilience annual journal HUDSON RIVER RISING Riverkeeper leads a growing movement to protect the Hudson. Its power is unstoppable. RIVERKEEPER JOURNAL 01 Time and again, the public rises to speak for a voiceless Hudson. While challenges mount, our voices grow stronger. 02 RIVERKEEPER JOURNAL PRESIDENT'S LETTER Faith and action It’s all too easy to feel hopeless these days, lish over forty new tanker and barge anchorages allowing storage of crude when you think about the threat posed by climate oil right on the Hudson, Riverkeeper is working with local partners to stop disruption and the federal government’s all-out another potentially disastrous plan to build enormous storm surge barriers war on basic clean water and habitat protection at the entrance to the Hudson Estuary. Instead, we and our partners are laws. Yet, Riverkeeper believes that a better fighting for real-world, comprehensive and community-driven solutions future remains ours for the taking. to coastal flooding risks. We think it makes perfect sense to feel hope- History was made, here on the Hudson. Groundbreaking legal pro- ful, given New York’s new best-in-the-nation tections were born here, over half a century ago, when earlier waves of climate legislation and its record levels of spend- activists rose to protect the Adirondacks, the Palisades and Storm King ing on clean water (which increased by another Mountain and restore our imperiled fish and wildlife. These founders had $500 million in April). This year, The Empire State also banned river-foul- no playbook and certainly no guarantee of success.
    [Show full text]
  • Army Corps of Engineers Response Document Draft
    3.0 ORANGE COUNTY Orange County has experienced numerous water resource problems along the main stem and the associated tributaries of the Moodna Creek and the Ramapo River that are typically affected by flooding during heavy rain events over the past several years including streambank erosion, agradation, sedimentation, deposition, blockages, environmental degradation, water quality and especially flooding. However, since October 2005, the flooding issues have severely increased and flooding continues during storm events that may or may not be considered significant. Areas affected as a result of creek flows are documented in the attached trip reports (Appendix D). Throughout the Orange County watershed, site visits confirmed opportunities to stabilize the eroding or threatened banks restore the riparian habitat while controlling sediment transport and improving water quality, and balance the flow regime. If the local municipalities choose to request Federal involvement, there are several options, depending on their budget, desired timeframe and intended results. The most viable options include a specifically authorized watershed study or program, or an emergency streambank protection project (Section 14 of the Continuing Authorities Program), or pursing a Continuing Authorities Program study for Flood Risk Management or Aquatic Ecosystem Restoration (Section 205 and Section 206 of the Continuing Authorities Program, respectively). Limited Federal involvement could also be provided in the form of the Planning Assistance to States or Support for Others programs provide assistance and limited funds outside of traditional Corps authorities. A watershed study focusing on restoration of the Moodna Creek, Otter Creek, Ramapo River and their associated tributaries could address various problems using a systematic approach.
    [Show full text]
  • FCGHT Master Plan Final
    Fishkill Creek Greenway & Heritage Trail Master Plan Fishkill Creek Gorge Timber Crib Dam Sucker Falls Beacon Falls and The Roundhouse Fishkill Creek Estuary This master plan document was funded in part by the Hudson River Valley Greenway June 2013 Fishkill Creek Greenway & Heritage Trail Master Plan Adopted by the City of Beacon City Council on June 17, 2013. Master Plan prepared for: Beacon City Council Randy Casale, Mayor George Mansfield, Council At-Large Justin Riccobono, Council At-Large Diane Spiak-Pisanelli, Ward 1 Charles Kelly, Ward 2 Agnes Papula Compagnone, Ward 3 Sara Pasti, Ward 4 Master Plan prepared by: Fishkill Creek Greenway Trail Committee James Korn, Chairman Thomas Wright, Member Jeff McHugh, Member Herman Gratz, Member Alan Flynn, Member Volunteers Mark Wildonger AICP, Volunteer Matthew Kierstead, Milestone Heritage Consulting, Volunteer Stowe Boyd, Volunteer Consulting Landscape Architect Peter Karis RLA 99 Rossway Road Pleasant Valley, NY 12569 p:845.489.5401 www.TaconicSiteDesign.com This plan was funded in part by the Hudson River Valley Greenway ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Fishkill Creek Greenway Trail Committee wishes to thank the following organizations for their support of this project: Our Volunteers - For their time, commitment and contributions to this master plan. Beacon City Council – For establishing the Beacon Greenway Trails Committee and for sponsoring the HRVG grant application that made this master plan possible. Hudson River Valley Greenway - For championing the notion of a regional trail system that is free and open to the public and for providing funding that allowed the committee to hire a professional consultant to direct the planning process of this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Empire Bridge Program Projects North Country
    EMPIRE BRIDGE PROGRAM PROJECTS NORTH COUNTRY County Town Route Crossed Construction Status Essex Keene RTE 73 Johns Br Construction Complete Essex Keene RTE 73 Johns Br Construction Complete Overflow Essex Keene RTE 73 Beede Construction Complete Brook Essex Keene RTE 73 Beede Construction Complete Brook Essex Keene RTE 73 E Br Ausable River Construction Complete Essex Keene RTE 73 E Br Ausable River Construction Complete Essex Keene RTE 73 Cascade Lake Construction Complete Outlet Essex North Elba RTE 73 W Br Ausable Construction Complete River Essex North Elba RTE 73 W Br Ausable Construction Complete River Essex Jay RTE 9N W Br Ausable Under Construction River Clinton Peru I-87 SB Lit Ausable River Construction Complete Clinton Peru I- 87 NB Lit Ausable River Construction Complete Clinton Plattsburgh I- 87 SB Salmon Construction Complete River Clinton Plattsburgh I- 87 NB Salmon Construction Complete River Total: 14 Bridges CAPITAL DISTRICT County Town Route Crossed Construction Status Warren Thurman Rte 28 Hudson River Construction Complete Washington Hudson Falls Rte 196 Glens Falls Construction Complete Feeder Canal Washington Hudson Falls Rte 4 Glens Falls Construction Complete Feeder Saratoga Malta Rte 9 Kayaderosseras Construction Complete Creek Saratoga Greenfield Rte 9n Kayaderosseras Construction Complete Creek Rensselaer Nassau Rte 20 Kinderhook Creek Construction Complete Rensselaer Nassau Rte 20 Kinderhook Creek Construction Complete Rensselaer Nassau Rte 20 Kinderhook Creek Construction Complete Rensselaer Hoosick Rte
    [Show full text]
  • Print This Article
    1 ; WILDFOWL 23 Published by the Wildfowl Trust, Slimbridge 1972 Editors: G. V. T. Matthews and M. A. Ogilvie The Wildfowl Trust, Slimbridge, Gloucester, England Cover painting by Peter Scott Line drawings by Peter Scott, Robert Gillmor, Barry A. Leach and others Price £1.75 ($5.50). Postage extra Issued free to Life Fellows, Fellows and Full Members of the Wildfowl Trust Printed for the w il d f o w l t r u s t b y THE BERKSHIRE p r in tin g CO. LTD., Reading, Berkshire, England, 1972 Index to Plates I a. Pair of Kelp Geese facing page 16 b. Female Falkland Flightless Steamer Duck and young II a. Male Kelp Goose 17 b. Female Kelp Goose I l l a. Feral Greylag Goose on nest 32 b. Feral Greylag Goose nest site IV a. Feral Greylags flying 33 b. Feral Greylag family party V a . Chilean Teal 56 b. Chilean Pintail V I a. Cereopsis Goose between pages 56-57 b. Female Cereopsis Goose and Young V II a. A pair of Andean Geese between pages 56-57 b. Pair of Greater Magellan Geese V III a. Pair of White-faced Whistling Ducks facing page 57 b. Pair of Orinoco Geese IX a. Greenland White-fronted Geese 80 b. Emperor Geese X a. Male European Pochard 81 b. Philippine Duck X I a and b. Female Musk Duck 96 X II a. Female Gadwall and Young 97 b. Black-necked Swan and young X III a and b. Hawaiian Goose and young 112 X IV a and b.
    [Show full text]