Factionalism in the Conservative Parliamentary Party: the 'Anti-Europeans' Since 1970

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Factionalism in the Conservative Parliamentary Party: the 'Anti-Europeans' Since 1970 Factionalism in the Conservative Parliamentary Party: The 'Anti-Europeans' since 1970. Philippa Jane Smedley Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds Department of Politics November 1998. The candidate confirms that the work submitted is her own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. 2 Philippa Jane Smedley Factionalism in the Conservative Parliamentary Party: The 'Anti-Europeans' since 1970. Submitted for the dejree of Doctor of Philosophy, November 1998. Abstract The Conservative Parliamentary Party (CPP), traditionally regarded as a party of unity and cohesion by many leading academics, has since the early 1970's, witnessed a public display of internal controversies and disunity amongst its members. In the last twenty-eight years, successive Conservative governments have required the CPP to adopt the Treaty of Rome and two major treaty changes. It is the intention of this research to show that it is specifically the task of securing parliament's ratification of the Treaty of Rome and subsequent changes, which has fragmented the CPP and catalysed division. It is argued that since Britain's third attempt to join the European Economic Community (EEC) in 1971, a number of Conservative Members of Parliament (MP's) have persistently opposed the principle of entry and any further attempts at integration. Their behaviour, in the furtherance of this aim, is to be regarded as "factional." In support of these two positions, this research narrates the story of Britain's integration with the evolutionary institutions of Europe, from the perspective of those Conservative Members of Parliament who, since the vote on principle of entry on 28 October 1971, have engaged in behaviour contrary to that expected by their leadership and colleagues. No academic work to date has closely examined the internal dynamics of factions within the CPP, which constitutes a crucial area of importance and academic interest as to the effective functioning of the party in office in the latter part of this century. This research goes some way towards the remedy of this omission by providing a case study of internal dissent over the span of the European debates, from the Parliamentary debates over Britain's membership of the BC 1971-2 to the European Finance debate in November 1994. The case demonstrates both the dynamics and effective roles in the CPP and the nature of party factionalism in contemporary British politics. Table of Contents Title page I Abstract 2 Table of Contents 3-5 List of Tables and Illustrative Materials 6-7 Acknowledgements 8 Chapter 1: Factions - Structures, Dynamics and the CFP 9-33 Introduction 9-12 Factions - A problem of definition 12-17 Factions versus Tendency, Party and Splits 17-19 1. Tendency 18 2. Party Split 18-19 3. A Party 19 Historical development 19-22 Factions - Origins, Dynamics and Processes 23-26 The Incidence offactions 26-2 7 The Nature of Dissent 2 7-28 Factions and the CPP 28-34 Conclusion 34 Chapter 2: A Short history of Conservative dissent on Europe since 1957 35-65 Introduction 35 195 7-1970 35-3 6 1970-1974 3 6-43 1974-1979 43-44 1979-1987 45-48 1988-1990 48-49 1991-1997 49-61 Conclusion 61 Chronology of events 62-65 Chapter 3: The Euro-sceptic Members of the CPF 66-100 Introduction - 66-68 The Identities of the CPP Euro-sceptics 68 Entry to the Europeans Communities 1971-2 68-70 The SEA 1986 70-71 The Maastricht Treaty 1992-3 71-78 The European Finance Bill 28 November 1994 78-79 Rebel Profiles 79-8 7 Variable 1: Prior record of Dissension on European Issues 80-81 Variable 2: Social Profile of the Euro-rebels - Age 8 1-83 Variable 3: Social Profile of the Euro-sceptics - Education 83-84 Variable 4: The size of an MP 's majority 84 Variable 5: Ideological Preferences of the Euro-sceptics 88-8 7 The Academic view of the CPP Euro-sceptics 8 7-88 Treatment of the CPP Euro-sceptics by the Press 88-90 The Conservative Party View of their Euro-sceptic MPs 90-92 Self-perceptions of the CPP Euro-sceptics 92-99 Conclusion 99-100 Chapter 4: Issues and Motivations 101-128 Introduction 101-1 02 The debates of Britain's application for entry to the EEC 1971-2 1 02-107 Heath's management of the issue 107-109 Domestic Considerations 109-111 A fundamentalist view 111 The debates of the Single European Act 111-113 The Party leadership 113 The Maastricht debates 114-123 4 The European Finance Bill 123-126 Conclusion 12 7-128 Chapter 5: The Structure and organisation of Conservative Euro-sceptic 129-1 62 Parliamentary opposition: intra-party groups and Independents Introduction 129 Conservative Opposition to the European Communities Bill 1971-2 130 The 1970 Group 130-134 Level of organisation 134-136 The SEA and the Conservative European Reform Group 13 6-138 Structure and organisation 138-139 The formation of a Conservative Euro-sceptic group in opposition to the 140-143 Maastricht Treaty Membership of the Fresh Start Group 143-146 Group organisation and structure 146-15 7 Leader 146-147 Whips 14 7-148 Other roles within Fresh Start 148-149 The FSG - meetings 149-15 7 Other Euro-sceptics of the CPP 15 7-158 The Independents 158-1 60 The Rebel Group of nine whipless Conservative Euro-sceptics 160-1 62 Conclusion 162 Chapter 6: An analysis of Euro-sceptic opposition 1 63-198 Introduction 163 Intra-parly Dissent 163-165 19 71-2 European Communities Bill 166 The 1970 Group 167-173 The SEA: Euro-sceptic opposition 1986 1 73-1 75 Conservative organised opposition to the Maastricht Treaty 1 75-1 76 The Independent Conservative anti-Maastricht MPs 176 Activities of the FSG: Organisation, Strategies and Tactics 177-180 The debates of the Maastricht Treaty - Second reading 180-18 1 The Paving Motion 181-184 Third Reading 184-186 The Social Chapter 186-189 The Vote of Confidence -23 July 1993 189-191 Conclusion: The success of the Fresh Start Group 191-193 Opposition to the European Finance Bill November 1994: Strategies 193-19 7 and tactics Conclusion 19 7-198 Chapter 7: Constraints to and impetus for Conservative Euro-sceptic 199-241 opposition Introduction 199 1. The CPP Whips 2 00-203 The European Communities Bill 1971-2 203-205 The Single European Act 205-206 The Maastricht Treaty 206-209 The European Finance Bill 209-210 2. Career Asp irations 210-2 13 3. Constituency Associations 213 The European Communities Bill 1971-2 213-215 The Single European Act 215-216 The Maastricht Treaty debates 216-219 The European Finance Bill 2 19-220 4. Party loyalty Peer and Pressure 220-223 5. The Party Leader 223 Edward Heath 224-226 Margaret Thatcher 22 6-228 John Major 228-232 European Finance Bill 232-233 6. Votes of Confidence 233-234 Maastricht - Votes of Confidence 234-237 7. Other Constraints to opposition 237-238 8. The Size of the Government's majority 238-240 Conclusion 240-241 Chapter 8: Conclusion - An 'Anti-European 'faction within the CPP? 242-271 Introduction 242 Britain's integration with the EU - An issue of Conservative intra- 242-244 parliamentary party dissent Are the Conservative Euro-sceptic an intra-party faction? 245 The 1971-2 Conservative anti-market MPs - an intra-parly tendency? 245-24 7 The 1971-2 anti-market Conservative MPs - an intra-party faction? 248-249 Conservative parliamentary opponents of the SEA - A latent Euro- 249 sceptic faction The Fresh Start Group - A Conservative Euro-sceptic faction 249-250 The activities of the Fresh Start Group and contingent factional criteria 250-254 Factional Ideology 254-255 Factional Leadership 255-256 Factional Technical Expertise 257 Factional Cadres and Communication Networks 25 7-258 Factional Rewards 258 Sub-factions 258-260 The implications of afactional CPP 261-2 62 Responsive Party leadersh:p 2 62-2 65 A provisionalframework offactional activity? 264-2 65 A factional party 266-269 The outcome 269-2 71 Appendix 1 272-273 Bibliography 274-284 List of Tables and illustrative materials Table 1.1 Summary ofNecessary and Contingent Characteristics of Party Entities. 14-15 Table 3.1 Summary of Conservative anti-market MP 's voting on the European 69 Communities Act 19 71-2 Table 3.2 Summary of Conservative anti-market MP 's voting on the European 70 Communities Act 1971-2 Table 3.3 Rebel League table of the Euro-sceptics Voting Behaviour across the Seven 73-74 Main Debates on the Maastricht Bill. Table 3.4: The Conservative Maastricht rebel league table according to Teresa 75 Gorman MP. Table 3.5 Summary of Euro-sceptic voting during debates on the Maastricht Treaty 77-78 199 1-2. Table 3.6 Conservative rebels of the EFB debate. 79 Table 3.7 Conservative MPs with Oxbridge education. 84 Chart 3.1 Comparison Age Ranges of Maastricht Euro-sceptics, the PCP and FSG 82 Chart 3.2 % Constituency majority of Maastricht Euro-sceptic MPs at 1992 election V 84 PCP Table 4.1 Themes in House of Commons Debate on EC Entry, July and October 1971: 103 The Conservative Euro-sceptics Table 4.2 Content analysis of interview data. Issues raised by of Conservative MPs who 104 opposed EEC entry during 19 71-2 Table 4.3 Content analysis of the issues raised by Conservative Antis during 106 Second reading of EC Bill, 1972 Table 4.4 Content analysis of the issues raised by Conservative Antis during 107 Third Reading of EC Bill, 13 July 1972.
Recommended publications
  • Draft Letter to the Prime Minister
    HOUSE OF COMMONS LONDO sw 1A OAA Rt. Hon. David Cameron MP Prime Minister 10 Downing Street London SW1A2AA Dear Prime Minister, As Members of Parliament for Staffordshire, we write to express our deep concern at the withdrawal of 3rd Battalion, the Mercian Regiment (The Staffards) from the Order of Battle. The Battalion has a proud history which can be traced back to its first raising at the King's Head Inn, Lichfield, in 1705. It served in Martinique, South Africa, Flanders, Gallipoli, Anzio and Arnhem. More recently, photographs of 3 Mercian fighting in Basra, became defining images of the Iraq campaign. We all recognise the difficult financial climate and the constraints that imposes on the Ministry of Defence. We understand that savings must be made. However, we also know that the decision to withdraw 3 Mercian will be distressing for all those currently serving, particularly those that might face redundancy, for their families and for those former Staffards who proudly recall their service. We know that it is the responsibility of the Mercian Regiment, as reorganised, to decide how best to reflect its history and antecedents. But as there is no longer any senior former Stafford serving on its staff, we hope that you will do all you can to encourage the Regiment to preserve and cherish the symbols, traditions and heritage of 3 Mercian within its ranks. 2 Mercian is known now as the Worcester and Sherwood Foresters as a result of previous amalgamations and we hope that a similar formula can be found to remember the Staffords.
    [Show full text]
  • Haessly, Katie (2010) British Conservative Women Mps
    British Conservative Women MPs and ‘Women’s Issues’ 1950-1979 Katie Haessly, BA MA Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2010 1 Abstract In the period 1950-1979, there were significant changes in legislation relating to women’s issues, specifically employment, marital and guardianship and abortion rights. This thesis explores the impact of Conservative female MPs on these changes as well as the changing roles of women within the party. In addition there is a discussion of the relationships between Conservative women and their colleagues which provides insights into the changes in gender roles which were occurring at this time. Following the introduction the next four chapters focus on the women themselves and the changes in the above mentioned women’s issues during the mid-twentieth century and the impact Conservative women MPs had on them. The changing Conservative attitudes are considered in the context of the wider changes in women’s roles in society in the period. Chapter six explores the relationship between women and men of the Conservative Parliamentary Party, as well as men’s impact on the selected women’s issues. These relationships were crucial to enhancing women’s roles within the party, as it is widely recognised that women would not have been able to attain high positions or affect the issues as they did without help from male colleagues. Finally, the female Labour MPs in the alteration of women’s issues is discussed in Chapter seven. Labour women’s relationships both with their party and with Conservative women are also examined.
    [Show full text]
  • Displaced Persons and the Politics of International Categorisation(S)
    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Law, Humanities and the Arts - Papers Faculty of Arts, Social Sciences & Humanities 1-1-2012 Displaced persons and the politics of international categorisation(s) Jayne Persian University of Wollongong, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/lhapapers Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons, and the Law Commons Recommended Citation Persian, Jayne, "Displaced persons and the politics of international categorisation(s)" (2012). Faculty of Law, Humanities and the Arts - Papers. 110. https://ro.uow.edu.au/lhapapers/110 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Displaced persons and the politics of international categorisation(s) Abstract Between 1947 and 1952 170,000 Displaced Persons (DPs) arrived in Australia as International Refugee Organisation (IRO)-sponsored refugees. This article sets out the international historical and political context for the migration of DPs to Australia, and interrogates the "bureaucratic labelling" inherent in the category "Displaced Persons". The post-war refugees were presented internationally as "Displaced Persons"; "refugees"; "political refugees"; and eventually, in an effort to solve the population crisis, as potential "workers" and "migrants". This article will describe the historical origin of the terms "Displaced Persons" "refugees", "political exiles" and "migrants"- terms which were, and continue to be, relevant and problematic. Keywords persons, categorisation, displaced, international, politics Disciplines Arts and Humanities | Law Publication Details Persian, J. (2012). Displaced persons and the politics of international categorisation(s). Australian Journal of Politics and History, 58 (4), 481-496.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011-2012, Vol. 27
    2011-2012 NORTHERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY PERSPECTIVES IN HISTORY VOLUME XXVII, 2011-2012 PERSPECTIVES IN HISTORY VOLUME Perspectives in History VOL. XXVII, 2011-2012 PHI ALPHA THETA ALPHA BETA PHI CHAPTER XXVIIPHI ALPHA THETA JOURNAL OF ALPHA BETA PHI CHAPTER OF PHI ALPHA THETA Officers Perspectives in Alpha Beta Phi Chapter History 2011-2012 James Lupo .................................President Ex-officio EDITOR Alexandra Barrett ......................President Kevin J. Leibach Caitlin Stylinski Hazelip ...........Vice President ASSISTANT EDITORS Matthew Chalfant ......................Treasurer Aaron Sprinkles Vincent Fraley ............................Historian Sheryn Labate Shane Winslow ..........................Secretary FACULTY ADVISOR Kevin Leibach .............................Journal Editor William Landon Kari Becker .................................Wellness Officer Perspectives in History is an annual scholarly publication of the Depart- ment of History and Geography at Northern Kentucky Unviersity (NKU). Opinions expressed by contributors do not necessarily reflect the views of the NKU Board of Regents, the faculty of the university, or of the student editors of the journal. Manuscripts are welcome from students and faculty in the Commonwealth of Kentucky. Send all articles, essays, and reviews to: Northern Kentucky University History/Geography Department Highland Heights, KY 41099 This publication was prepared by Northern Kentucky University and printed with state funds (KRS 57.375). Northern Kentucky University is committed to building a diverse faculty and staff for employment and promotion to ensure the highest quality of workforce and to foster an environment that embraces the broad range of human diversity. The university is committed to equal employment opportunity, affirmative action, and eliminating discrimination. This commitment is consistent with an intellectual community that celebrates individual differences and diversity as well as being a matter of law.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliaments and Legislatures Series Samuel C. Patterson
    PARLIAMENTS AND LEGISLATURES SERIES SAMUEL C. PATTERSON GENERAL ADVISORY EDITOR Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government EDITED BY SHAUN BOWLER, DAVID M. FARRELL, AND RICHARD S. KATZ OHI O STATE UNIVERSITY PRESS COLUMBUS Copyright © 1999 by The Ohio State University. All rights reserved. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Party discipline and parliamentary government / edited by Shaun Bowler, David M. Farrell, and Richard S. Katz. p. cm. — (Parliaments and legislatures series) Based on papers presented at a workshop which was part of the European Consortium for Political Research's joint sessions in France in 1995. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8142-0796-0 (cl: alk. paper). — ISBN 0-8142-5000-9 (pa : alk. paper) 1. Party discipline—Europe, Western. 2. Political parties—Europe, Western. 3. Legislative bodies—Europe, Western. I. Bowler, Shaun, 1958- . II. Farrell, David M., 1960- . III. Katz, Richard S. IV. European Consortium for Political Research. V. Series. JN94.A979P376 1998 328.3/75/ 094—dc21 98-11722 CIP Text design by Nighthawk Design. Type set in Times New Roman by Graphic Composition, Inc. Printed by Bookcrafters, Inc.. The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials. ANSI Z39.48-1992. 98765432 1 Contents Foreword vii Preface ix Part I: Theories and Definitions 1 Party Cohesion, Party Discipline, and Parliaments 3 Shaun Bowler, David M. Farrell, and Richard S. Katz 2 How Political Parties Emerged from the Primeval Slime: Party Cohesion, Party Discipline, and the Formation of Governments 23 Michael Laver and Kenneth A.
    [Show full text]
  • A Summary and Way Forward Youth Engagement Review a Summary and Way Forward Youth Engagement Review a Summary and Way Forward
    Youth Engagement Review A Summary and Way Forward Youth Engagement Review A Summary and Way Forward Youth Engagement Review A Summary and Way Forward CADE D T E N F I O B R C M E O C Contents Foreword by Rt Hon Andrew Robathan MP Minister for Defence Personnel Welfare and Veterans 2 SECTION 1 Defence Youth Engagement as it is today. 3 Case Study – Operation Youth Advantage + 5 SECTION 2 The need for a review 6 SECTION 3 The benefits to Defence of engaging Young People 8 SECTION 4 The benefits to Society of Defence Youth Engagement 9 Case Study – Aftermath of the August 2011 riots 11 SECTION 5 Analysis of youth engagement activity 12 Case Study – Cadet service improving life outcomes 14 SECTION 6 Implementing the YER and beyond 15 Case Study – Education Outreach 17 Case Study – Cadets striving for excellence 18 Youth Engagement Review 1 Foreword by Rt Hon Andrew Robathan MP Minister for Defence Personnel Welfare and Veterans his brief report summarises the Defence Youth Engagement Review (YER) and how the MOD intends Tto take it forward. I commissioned this Review in July 2010 in the wake of celebrations marking the 150th anniversary of the Cadet Forces. I wanted to ensure that we were making the most of not just the Cadet Forces but the many other youth engagement activities that the MOD, including the Armed Forces, undertake. I believe that not enough is done to promote the work that we do in this area. For too long we have been keeping Defence’s Youth Engagement activities to ourselves.
    [Show full text]
  • Women Mps in Westminster Photographs Taken May 21St, June 3Rd, June 4Th, 2008
    “The House of Commons Works of Art Collection documents significant moments in Parliamentary history. We are delighted to have added this unique photographic record of women MPs of today, to mark the 90th anniversary of women first being able to take their seats in this House” – Hugo Swire, Chairman, The Speaker's Advisory Committee on Works of Art. “The day the Carlton Club accepted women” – 90 years after women first got the vote aim to ensure that a more enduring image of On May 21st 2008 over half of all women women's participation in the political process Members of Parliament in Westminster survives. gathered party by party to have group photographs taken to mark the anniversary of Each party gave its permission for the 90 years since women first got the vote (in photographs to be taken. For the Labour February 1918 women over 30 were first Party, Barbara Follett MP, the then Deputy granted the vote). Minister for Women and Equality, and Barbara Keeley MP, who was Chair of the Labour Party Women’s Committee and The four new composite Caroline Adams, who works for the photographs taken party by Parliamentary Labour Party helped ensure that all but 12 of the Labour women party aim to ensure that a attended. more enduring image of For the Conservative women's participation in the Party, The Shadow Leader of the House of political process survives Commons and Shadow Minister for Until now the most often used photographic Women, Theresa May image of women MPs had been the so called MP and the Chairman “Blair Babes” picture taken on 7th May 1997 of the Conservative shortly after 101 Labour women were elected Party, Caroline to Westminster as a result of positive action by Spelman MP, enlisted the Labour Party.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of the Civil Service
    HOUSE OF COMMONS SESSION 1993-94 TREASURY AND CIVIL SERVICE COMMITTEE Fifth Report THE ROLE OF THE CIVIL SERVICE VOLUME I Ordered by The House of Commons to he printed I November 1994 k 27-1 House of Commons Parliamentary Papers Online. Copyright (c) 2007 ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. 2 FIFTH REPORT FROM The Treasury and Civil Service Committee is appointed under S.O. No. 130 to examine the expendi- ture, administration and policy of the Treasury and the Office of Public Ser\'ice and Science (but exclud- ing the Office of Science and Technology and the drafting of bills by the Parliamentary Counsel Office), the Board of Customs and Excise and the Board of the inland Revenue. The Committee consists of a maximum of eleven members, of whom the quorum is three. Unless the House otherwise orders, all Members nominated to the Committee continue to be members of the Committee for the remainder of the Parliament. The Committee has power: (a) to send for j>ersons, papers and records, to sit notwithstanding any adjournment of the House, to adjourn from place to place, and to report from time to time; (b) to appoint specialist advisers either to supply information which is not readily available or elucidate matters of complexity within the Committee's order of reference; (c) to communicate to any other such committee and to the Committee of Public Accounts their evidence and any other documents relating to matters of common interest; (d) to meet concurrently with any other such committee for the purposes of deliberating, taking evidence or considering draft reports.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy
    Conservative Parties and the Birth of Democracy How do democracies form and what makes them die? Daniel Ziblatt revisits this timely and classic question in a wide-ranging historical narrative that traces the evolution of modern political democracy in Europe from its modest beginnings in 1830s Britain to Adolf Hitler’s 1933 seizure of power in Weimar Germany. Based on rich historical and quantitative evidence, the book offers a major reinterpretation of European history and the question of how stable political democracy is achieved. The barriers to inclusive political rule, Ziblatt finds, were not inevitably overcome by unstoppable tides of socioeconomic change, a simple triumph of a growing middle class, or even by working class collective action. Instead, political democracy’s fate surprisingly hinged on how conservative political parties – the historical defenders of power, wealth, and privilege – recast themselves and coped with the rise of their own radical right. With striking modern parallels, the book has vital implications for today’s new and old democracies under siege. Daniel Ziblatt is Professor of Government at Harvard University where he is also a resident fellow of the Minda de Gunzburg Center for European Studies. He is also currently Fernand Braudel Senior Fellow at the European University Institute. His first book, Structuring the State: The Formation of Italy and Germany and the Puzzle of Federalism (2006) received several prizes from the American Political Science Association. He has written extensively on the emergence of democracy in European political history, publishing in journals such as American Political Science Review, Journal of Economic History, and World Politics.
    [Show full text]
  • RESTORING BRITISHNESS a Cultural Policy for an Independent Britain RESTORING BRITISHNESS
    Policy Statement RESTORING BRITISHNESS A cultural policy for an independent Britain RESTORING BRITISHNESS A CULTURAL POLICY FOR AN INDEPENDENT BRITAIN A POLICY STATEMENT January 2010 Contents 1. Introduction page 3 2. The Problem: Britain and Britishness under pressure page 4 3. Executive Summary page 5 4. Britishness Defined page 7 5.Threats to Britishness : The Politically Correct “Liberal page 8 Elite” 6. Threats to Britishness: Threat of Nationalism page 11 7. Threats to Britishness: Extremist Islam page 12 8. Threats to Britishness: Foreign ownership, Short-termism and page 13 the Treasury 9. Threats to Britishness: European Union (EU) page 14 10. Threats to Britishness: Americanisation page 16 11. Restoring Britishness: Political, Legal & Economic Measures page 18 12. Restoring Britishness: Media, Cultural & Sporting Measures page 22 13. Restoring Britishness: Educational, Art and Music Measures page 26 References, Appendix & Bibliography page 28 Acknowledgements page 29 1. Introduction Britain and Britishness are in trouble. They are being attacked and undermined, both externally and internally. They are threatened by the European Union (EU) and corporatist Americanised pressures from without, and betrayed by misguided politically correct ideology, extremist Islam and errant nationalism from within. Decades of withering attacks on the concepts of patriotism and sovereignty, and an uncharitable reading of British history have led many to conclude that Britain is a country undeserving of affection and loyalty. Britain now suffers directly and indirectly from having an anti-British British establishment born of a 1960s self-loathing. The European Union (EU) remains a threat to Britishness as it undermines the once proud status Britain had as an independent state.
    [Show full text]
  • Contents Theresa May - the Prime Minister
    Contents Theresa May - The Prime Minister .......................................................................................................... 5 Nancy Astor - The first female Member of Parliament to take her seat ................................................ 6 Anne Jenkin - Co-founder Women 2 Win ............................................................................................... 7 Margaret Thatcher – Britain’s first woman Prime Minister .................................................................... 8 Penny Mordaunt – First woman Minister of State for the Armed Forces at the Ministry of Defence ... 9 Lucy Baldwin - Midwifery and safer birth campaigner ......................................................................... 10 Hazel Byford – Conservative Women’s Organisation Chairman 1990 - 1993....................................... 11 Emmeline Pankhurst – Leader of the British Suffragette Movement .................................................. 12 Andrea Leadsom – Leader of House of Commons ................................................................................ 13 Florence Horsbrugh - First woman to move the Address in reply to the King's Speech ...................... 14 Helen Whately – Deputy Chairman of the Conservative Party ............................................................. 15 Gillian Shephard – Chairman of the Association of Conservative Peers ............................................... 16 Dorothy Brant – Suffragette who brought women into Conservative Associations ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Simon Usherwood
    OPPOSITION TO THE EUROPEAN UNION IN THE UK 211 Simon Usherwood Opposition to the European Union in the UK: The Dilemma of Public Opinion and Party Management THE MAIN AIM OF THIS ARTICLE IS TO UNDERSTAND SOME OF THE processes at work in the management of European policy formation by political parties in the UK.1 More specifically, it attempts to apply and extend the model proposed by Aspinwall of institutional con- straints on that policy management.2 Whereas Aspinwall limits the application of his model to parliamentary coalitions and effective power, we push the model further by describing and analysing its interaction with other features of the political landscape, most notably the generally low level of interest in European affairs on the part of the British public. For almost all of the post-war period, the question of ‘Europe’ has been one that has occupied the minds of British legislators and governments.3 But the temptation for most commentators to con- centrate on cultural and historical explanations of ‘otherness’ in the British case has resulted in a neglect of the more practical effects of institutional structures. This article addresses some of those effects by first providing a brief overview of Aspinwall’s model, which suggests that the first-past-the-post (FPP) system creates centrifugal forces within the party system, resulting in parties holding com- promise policy positions. This is followed by a discussion of the 1 Thanks are due to Stephen George, Mark Aspinwall, Paul Taggart, Jo Waller and those at the presentation of this paper at the Political Studies Association 51st Conference, Manchester, 10–12 April 2001.
    [Show full text]