DOCSLIB.ORG

Study on Passenger Transport by Taxi, Hire Car with Driver and Ridesharing in the EU

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Study on Passenger Transport by Taxi, Hire Car with Driver and Ridesharing in the EU Study on passenger transport by taxi, hire car with driver and ridesharing in the EU ANNEX IV – Case Studies Report Study contract no. MOVE/D3/SER/2015-564/SI2.715085 Prepared by: Simona Frazzani (Grimaldi), Gabriele Grea (CERTeT Università Luigi Bocconi), Alessandro Zamboni (Wavestone), Noti Kletia (Grimaldi), Dalila Frisani (Grimaldi), Giuseppe Siciliano (CERTeT Università Bocconi), Mirjam Louws, Marc Padberg (Kneppelhout Korthals Advocaten), Zuzanna Wencel-Czuryszkiewicz, Artur Swinturn (Magnusson Poland), Agnes Said (Sweden). Revised by: Simona Frazzani 26 September 2016 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport Directorate C - Land Unit C.1 - Road Transport Contact: Peter SZATMARI E-mail: [email protected] European Commission B-1049 Brussels Study on passenger transport by taxi, hire car with driver and ridesharing in the EU Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). LEGAL NOTICE This document has been prepared for the European Commission however it reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://www.europa.eu). 3 Study on passenger transport by taxi, hire car with driver and ridesharing in the EU TABLE OF CONTENTS I. AMSTERDAM CASE STUDY ................................................................................ 7 I.1 Introduction ............................................................................................. 7 I.2 Regulatory and Administrative Framework .................................................... 7 I.3 Enforcement ........................................................................................... 15 I.4 New Urban Mobility ................................................................................. 16 I.5 Market analysis ....................................................................................... 16 I.6 Users’ satisfaction ................................................................................... 18 I.7 Market conditions and development ........................................................... 19 I.8 Conclusions ............................................................................................ 19 II. BRUSSELS CASE STUDY .............................................................................. 21 II.1 Introduction ........................................................................................... 21 II.2 Regulatory and Administrative Framework .................................................. 22 II.3 Enforcement ........................................................................................... 32 II.4 New Urban Mobility ................................................................................. 36 II.5 Market analysis ....................................................................................... 38 II.6 Users’ satisfaction ................................................................................... 43 II.7 Market conditions and development ........................................................... 44 II.8 Conclusions ............................................................................................ 46 III. LONDON CASE STUDY ................................................................................ 47 III.1 Introduction ........................................................................................... 47 III.2 Regulatory and Administrative Framework .................................................. 47 III.3 Enforcement ........................................................................................... 63 III.4 New Urban Mobility ................................................................................. 65 III.5 Market analysis ....................................................................................... 66 III.6 Users’ satisfaction ................................................................................... 73 III.7 Market conditions and development ........................................................... 77 III.8 Conclusions ............................................................................................ 78 IV. PARIS CASE STUDY .................................................................................... 80 IV.1 Introduction ........................................................................................... 80 IV.2 Regulatory and Administrative Framework .................................................. 80 IV.3 Enforcement ........................................................................................... 90 IV.4 New Urban Mobility ................................................................................. 91 IV.5 Market analysis ....................................................................................... 92 IV.6 Users’ satisfaction ................................................................................... 98 IV.8 Conclusions .......................................................................................... 101 V. ROME CASE STUDY ...................................................................................... 102 V.1 Introduction ......................................................................................... 102 V.2 Regulatory and Administrative Framework ................................................ 103 4 Study on passenger transport by taxi, hire car with driver and ridesharing in the EU V.3 Enforcement ......................................................................................... 113 V.4 New Urban Mobility ............................................................................... 115 V.5 Market analysis ..................................................................................... 115 V.6 Users’ satisfaction ................................................................................. 117 V.7 Market conditions and development ......................................................... 120 V.8 Conclusions .......................................................................................... 121 VI. STOCKHOLM ............................................................................................ 123 VI.1 Introduction ......................................................................................... 123 VI.2 Regulatory and Administrative Framework ................................................ 123 VI.3 Enforcement ......................................................................................... 128 VI.4 New Urban Mobility ............................................................................... 129 VI.5 Market analysis ..................................................................................... 130 VI.6 Users’ satisfaction ................................................................................. 132 VI.7 Market conditions and developments ....................................................... 133 VI.8 Conclusions .......................................................................................... 134 VII. WARSAW CASE STUDY .............................................................................. 136 VII.1 Introduction ...................................................................................... 136 VII.2 Regulatory and Administrative Framework ............................................. 136 VII.3 Enforcement ...................................................................................... 144 VII.4 New Urban Mobility ............................................................................ 146 VII.5 Market analysis .................................................................................. 147 VII.6 Users’ satisfaction .............................................................................. 148 VII.7 Market conditions and development ...................................................... 150 VII.8 Conclusions ....................................................................................... 150 VIII. VIENNA- BRATISLAVA CASE STUDY ......................................................... 152 VIII.1 Overview of the taxi, hire car with driver and ridesharing in Vienna .......... 152 VIII.2 Overview of the taxi, hire car with driver and ridesharing in Bratislava ...... 153 VIII.3 Cross border catchment area ............................................................... 154 VIII.4 Transport providers information ........................................................... 155 VIII.5 Conclusions ....................................................................................... 156 5 Study on passenger transport by taxi, hire car with driver and ridesharing in the EU Methodology The methodology for the in-depth case studies was similar to the methodology applied to the country reports with the addition of the consumer panel. The case-studies have been prepared based on desk research and with the replies to the stakeholder consultation. Each case study has been drafted by a national legal expert according to a template. A different template was used in the cross-border case since it covers only certain cross-border aspects. Each report is accompanied by quantitative data collection covering the available data
Load more

Recommended publications
  • New Generation of Bike-Sharing Systems in China: Lessons for European Cities
    Volume XI • Issue 33 (September 2018) JMFS pp. 25–42 Journal of Management Warsaw School of Economics and Financial Sciences Collegium of Management and Finance Tomasz Bieliński, Agnieszka Ważna Faculty of Economics University of Gdańsk New Generation of Bike-Sharing Systems in China: Lessons for European Cities ABSTRACT Rising mobility of societies and the urban sprawl cause the need to shape passengers’ behaviour accordingly. For urbanised areas, the biggest challenge is to overcome the problem of dominant private cars usage. Bike-sharing systems are considered to be a successful tool for the popularisation of alternative ways of travelling. Recently Chinese companies have developed new solutions to bike-sharing systems that proved to be successful in China and could be implemented in Europe. However, their implementation will be associated with challenges for municipal authorities and companies conducting the business. The aim of the paper is to identify major advantages and challenges resulting from the implementation of the Chinese solutions in Europe or expansion of bike-sharing companies to Europe. The scientific method used in the paper is the case study of the Chinese bike-sharing market with the special focus on market leaders Mobike and Ofo. Despite existing obstacles, it is possible to succeed in introducing the new generation of bike-sharing systems in Europe. As Chinese enterprises have already entered the European market, it is crucial to make policy makers aware of the obstructions. Keywords: sustainable transportation, urban transport, bicycles, public bikes, Ofo, Mobike, envi- ronmentally friendly transport, dockless bikes, passenger transport innovation JEL Classification Codes: R41, R42 26 Tomasz Bieliński, Agnieszka Ważna Introduction Major challenges of the EU transport policy are to a great extent linked with sustainable development.
    [Show full text]
  • Warsaw Nno.O
    Maps Events Restaurants Cafés Nightlife Sightseeing Shopping Hotels Warsaw NNo.o. 882,2, AAugustugust - SSeptembereptember 22014014 The Warsaw Uprising Awe Inspiring - 70 Years On inyourpocket.com ł No. 82 - 5z ȱȱ¢ȱȱȱ ȱȱ¢ȱȱ ȱȱȱȱ ȱ ȱȱĴȱȱ ǯȱȱŝǰȱ£ ȱǯǯǯȱ ǯȱŘŘȱŞŚŞȱŗŘȱŘśǰȱǯȦ¡ȱŘŘȱŞŚŞȱŗśȱşŖ ǯǯǯȱȱ ȱȱȱ ǯ£ǯǯ ǯ ȱ ȱȱȱȱȱǰȱ¢ȱȱ ȱȱ ȱȱȱ ȱȱȱ ȱȱ¢ȱ ȱ ȱ Ěȱȱȱȱ¢ȱ¢ǯ ȱȱȱȱȱȱȱ dz Contents Feature Further Afi eld Warsaw Uprising 8 Łódź 106 Arrival & Transport 12 Leisure 108 City Basics 18 Shopping 112 Culture & Events 20 Directory 118 Restaurants 26 Hotels 120 Cafés 57 Maps & Index Street Index 124 Nightlife 58 City Centre Map 125 Sightseeing City Map 126-127 Essential Warsaw 71 Country Map 128 Sightseeing 72 Listings Index 129 Old Town 84 The Royal Route 87 Features Index 130 Palace of Culture and Science 89 Praga 90 Copernicus Science Center 92 Łazienki 94 IN PRINT Wilanów 97 Jewish Warsaw 100 ONLINE Chopin 103 ON YOUR MOBILE PLAC TEATRALNY 3, WARSAW TEL. +48 601 81 82 83 Monument to the Warsaw Uprising Photo by Zbigniew Furman. Courtesy of Warsaw Uprising Museum. [email protected] 4 Warsaw In Your Pocket warsaw.inyourpocket.com Foreword Welcome to Warsaw and the 82nd edition of Warsaw Publisher In Your Pocket! Summer is in full swing and the city is IYP City Guides Sp. z o.o. Sp.k. absolutely sizzling. It’s the perfect time to take advantage ul. Sławkowska 12, 31-014 Kraków the capitals’ many fi ner points - exploring the parks, [email protected] gardens (beer) and breathtaking urban riverwalks (take www.inyourpocket.com a walk on the wild side!).
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Guidelines
    GUIDANCE ON PREPARING WORKPLACES FOR COVID-19 TRANSPORTATION 1 The transportation and warehousing sector includes industries providing transportation of passengers and cargo, scenic and sightseeing transportation, and support activities related to modes of transportation. Wisconsin has more than 117,000 workers and 6,600 businesses in this sector, all working to keep the state’s economy moving. As many people stay safe at home, COVID-19 has significantly affected public transportation services such as ride sharing, taxi services, buses and air transportation. The nature of these services makes it difficult to practice social distancing. Trucking and rail industries have also been affected, but with a distinct difference between those that work in essential versus nonessential industries. Nonessential commercial transport is not allowed under the Safer at Home Order. The Wisconsin Department of Transportation is providing additional permits to truckers, adding rest areas, and relaxing weight and driver hour restrictions to aid the delivery of crucial food, medical supplies and other supplies during the pandemic. The guidelines contained in this document can help protect safety and maintain operations during the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, please see the “General Guidance for All Businesses” document for guidance that applies to all industries and consult the other available industry guides as relevant for your specific business type. Recommendations for Transportation Employee health and hygiene Personal protective equipment (PPE) and cloth face coverings Employees who have a fever or other symptoms of COVID-19 should not be allowed to work. Develop a plan to have sufficient PPE on hand for both Emphasize effective hand hygiene, including washing routine operations and emergencies (for example, offering an hands for at least 20 seconds, especially before ill employee or customer a face mask until they can leave the preparing or eating food; after going to the bathroom; workplace).
    [Show full text]
  • Performance Analysis of Fixed Route Shared Taxi Services (Jitney) - Case Study of Tehran, Iran
    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Performance Analysis of Fixed Route Shared Taxi Services (Jitney) - Case Study of Tehran, Iran Ataeian, Shervin and Mostafavi, Alireza and Nabiloo, Roya Department of Industrial Engineering, Urmia University, West Azarbaijan, Iran, Department of Transportation Planning, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran, School of Civil Engineering, Department of Transportation Planning, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran March 2020 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/99871/ MPRA Paper No. 99871, posted 27 Apr 2020 06:21 UTC Computational Research Progress in Applied Science & Engineering ISSN 2423-4591 CRPASE Vol. 06(01), 52-59, March 2020 Performance Analysis of Fixed Route Shared Taxi Services (Jitney) - Case Study of Tehran, Iran Shervin Ataeiana, Alireza Mostafavib, Roya Nabilooc a Department of Industrial Engineering, Urmia University, West Azarbaijan, Iran b Department of Transportation Planning, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran c School of Civil Engineering, Department of Transportation Planning, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran Keywords Abstract Fixed Route Shared Taxi, The fixed route shared taxi, known as Jitney, is one of the common modes in paratransit Jitney, services and covers a significant proportion of daily trips in some developing countries, Paratransit, including Iran. Such system, despite its disadvantages to transportation networks, has always Performance Analysis, been the most feasible solution to overcome the shortcoming in public transit supply. As a Performance Index, result, it has formed users’ travel habits over the decades. Therefore, it is not possible to Decision Criteria. remove or replace Jitney lines with standard services suddenly but gradually.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting of the Livable Roadways Committee Hillsborough County MPO Chairman Wednesday, April 19, 2017, 9:00 AM
    Commissioner Lesley “Les” Miller, Jr. Meeting of the Livable Roadways Committee Hillsborough County MPO Chairman Wednesday, April 19, 2017, 9:00 AM Councilman Harry Cohen City of Tampa MPO Vice Chairman I. Call to Order Paul Anderson Tampa Port Authority II. Public Comment - 3 minutes per speaker, please Wallace Bowers HART III. Approval of Minutes – March 22, 2017 Trent Green IV. Action Items Planning Commission Commissioner Ken Hagan A. Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) Update Hillsborough County th Commissioner Pat Kemp B. TIP Amendments (34 St., SR 674) Hillsborough County V. Status Reports Mayor Kim Leinbach Temple Terrace A. “Getting to School” Survey Results (Patti Simmons, SDHC) Joe Lopano Hillsborough County B. City of Tampa Livable Projects– Downtown Curb Extension Project, Aviation Authority Mayor Rick A Lott Laurel Sreet & Doyle Carlton Drive Intersection and Bayshore Blvd City of Plant City Councilman Buffered Bike Lanes and Traffic Calming (Cal Hardie, City of Tampa staff) Guido Maniscalco City of Tampa C. Plant City Walk-Bike Plan Update (Wade Reynolds, MPO staff) Commissioner Sandra Murman VI. Old Business & New Business Hillsborough County Cindy Stuart A. MPO Regional Coordination Structure Research & Best Practices Study Hillsborough County School Board (Beth Alden, MPO Executive Director) Councilman Luis Viera City of Tampa B. Hillsborough County has opened up a comment period for several of their Joseph Waggoner Public Works and Public Utilities Technical Manuals until May 31. Link Expressway Authority Commissioner HCFLGov.net/en/businesses/land-development/technical-publications Stacy R. White Hillsborough County VII. Adjournment Beth Alden, AICP Executive Director VIII. Addendum A. MPO Committee Report B.
    [Show full text]
  • Guideline for Bike Rental Transdanube.Pearls Final Draft
    Transdanube.Pearls - Network for Sustainable Mobility along the Danube http://www.interreg-danube.eu/approved-projects/transdanube-pearls Guideline for bike rental Transdanube.Pearls Final Draft WP/Action 3.1 Author: Inštitút priestorového plánovania Version/Date 3.0, 23.11.2017 Document Revision/Approval Version Date Status Date Status 3.0 23/11/2017 Final draft xx.xx.xxxx final Contacts Coordinator: Bratislava Self-governing Region Sabinovská 16, P.O. Box 106 820 05 Bratislava web: www.region-bsk.sk Author: Inštitút priestorového plánovania Ľubľanská 1 831 02 Bratislava web: http://ipp.szm.com More information about Transdanube.Pearls project are available at www.interreg-danube.eu/approved-projects/transdanube-pearls Page 2 of 41 www.interreg-danube.eu/approved-projects/transdanube-pearls Abbreviations BSS Bike Sharing Scheme ECF European Cyclists´ Federation POI Point of Interest PT Public Transport Page 3 of 41 www.interreg-danube.eu/approved-projects/transdanube-pearls Table of content Contacts ..................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Bike Rental ................................................................................................................................................................ 5 Execuive summary ................................................................................................................................................. 5 1. Best practice examples from across
    [Show full text]
  • Bus Rapid Transit
    Different School’s of Thoughts Car Oriented Approach Public Oriented Approach Spaced Required for same amount of Passenger Based on Avg. occupancy 1.6 Passengers/Vehicle BUS RAPID TRANSIT (BRT) SYSTEM BRT Features for Effective Implementation • Exclusive bus lanes • Traffic signal priority for buses • Smart fare collection system that speeds up the boarding process • Same-level boarding platform and bus floor • Effective, clearly designated off-street facilities to handle increased numbers of buses in the central business district • Hierarchical system of services • Supportive land use policy BRTS Around the Globe Source: Embarq Need of Integration • For due patronage to Mass Rapid Transit System (MRTS) in terms of ridership • For door-to-door service • For reduction in travel time • To decrease the out pocket cost • Providing services to new areas or new communities and to more people • To enhance comfort level and safety to commuters & to eliminate wasteful duplication • To increase the desirable modal share • To provide better service to existing and future demand BRT System with Modal Integration (e.g. Bicycle parking, Taxi stations, Easy transfers between public transport systems) Curitiba, Beijing ,Hangzhou, Kunming, Nagoya, Taipei, Adelaide ,Brisbane Sydney, Paris ,Amsterdam ,Edinburgh, Ottawa, Pittsburgh ,Bogota Modes Used For Integrated Public Transport System Public Transport (PT) Modes • Medium & Mini Size Bus Paratransit Modes • Van/Mini-Vans • Taxi/Share Taxi • Dial-a-ride Taxi/ Radio Taxi • Auto Rickshaw • Tempo Non Motorised Transport (NMT) Modes • PediCabs/Cycle Rickshaw • Bicycle Paratransit • Paratransit is an alternative mode of flexible passenger transportation that does not follow fixed routes or schedules. Typically mini-buses, mini vans , share taxis and dial-a ride taxis are used to provide paratransit services.
    [Show full text]
  • Tod Policies and Guidelines
    MASSACHUSETTS BAY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TOD POLICIES AND GUIDELINES DRAFT Revised March 31, 2017 CONTENTS Part I: Introduction ..........................................................................................................................1 What is TOD?.................................................................................................................................1 What is the role of the MBTA and MassDOT? ..................................................................................2 Why is TOD important to the MBTA and MassDOT? .......................................................................2 Part II. TOD Policies ........................................................................................................................3 The Conduct of TOD.......................................................................................................................3 Joint Development ......................................................................................................................3 Station Area Planning and Development .......................................................................................4 Value Capture .............................................................................................................................5 The Content of TOD: Foundational Principles...................................................................................5 A. Density and Mix of Uses .........................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Program Guidelines
    ALAMEDA County Transportation Commission Alameda County Transportation Commission GUARANTEED RIDE HOME PROGRAM GUIDELINES Updated July 2017 Contents The Alameda Introduction 2 County Guaranteed Program Basics 3 Ride Home Program Program Registration 4 When unexpected circumstances arise, the Alameda County Guaranteed Ride Home (GRH) Program provides What is Eligible for Reimbursement 5 a free ride home from work for employees who choose to commute by not driving alone. The GRH program Program Limits 5 is free for employees who register for the program, work in Alameda County, and use sustainable forms of Requesting and Receiving Reimbursements 7 transportation including walking, biking, taking transit, or ridesharing. When a registered employee uses a sustainable mode to travel to work and experiences a personal or family emergency while at work, they can take a taxi, Transportation Network Company (TNC) service such as Lyft or Uber, rental car, car share, or public transportation ride home and be reimbursed for the cost of the ride. This program allows commuters to feel comfortable taking the bus, train or ferry, carpooling, vanpooling, walking, or bicycling to work, knowing that they will have a ride home in case of an emergency. The Guaranteed Ride Home Program helps to reduce traffic and improve air quality in the Bay Area by encouraging commuters to leave their car behind for their commute to work. The Alameda County GRH program is a commuter benefit provided by the Alameda County Transportation Commission (Alameda CTC). The Alameda CTC plans, funds, and delivers transportation projects and programs to improve accessibility and mobility in Alameda County. Funding for the Alameda County GRH program is provided by the Bay Area Air Quality Management District through a Transportation Fund for Clean Air grant in partnership with the Alameda CTC.
    [Show full text]
  • King County Metro Transit Five-Year Implementation Plan for Alternatives to Traditional Transit Service Delivery
    King County Metro Transit Five-year implementation plan for alternatives to traditional transit service delivery June 15, 2012 This page intentionally left blank. King County Metro Transit Five-year implementation plan for alternatives to traditional transit service delivery June 15, 2012 Department of Transportation Metro Transit Division King Street Center, KSC-TR-0415 201 S. Jackson St Seattle, WA 98104 206-553-3000 TTY Relay: 711 www.kingcounty.gov/metro Alternative Formats Available 206-263-5277 TTY Relay: 711 12025/comm Contents BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT ………………………………… 2 DESCRIPTION OF ALTERNATIVE SERVICES …………………… 4 OPPORTUNITIES FOR ALTERNATIVE SERVICE DELIVERY ……… 6 PROCESS FOR COMMUNITY COLLABORATION ……………… 10 TIMELINE AND PLANNING …………………………………… 12 POLICY CHANGES FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATION …………… 14 CONCLUSION ………………………………………………… 14 Appendix A: REVIEW OF BEST PRACTICES ……………………………… A-1 B: STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT …………………………… A-10 C: CONSTRAINTS TO IMPLEMENTATION …………………… A-15 D: STRATEGIES TO BUILD RIDERSHIP ………………………… A-18 E: MEASURING SUCCESS …………………………………… A-20 F: CASE STUDIES ……………………………………………… A-21 G: BIBLIOGRAPHY …………………………………………… A-38 H: LOW-PERFORMING ROUTES ……………………………… A-45 I: PRODUCT MATRIX ………………………………………… A-49 Note: Appendix I is formatted to fit 8.5” x 14” (legal size) paper. ii KING COUNTY METRO TRANSIT ALTERNATIVE SERVICE DELIVERY FIVE-YEAR IMPLEMENTATION REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY As the primary public transportation provider in King County, Metro Transit strives to provide transportation choices that make it easy for people to travel in the county and the region. This requires us to find a fair and acceptable way to deliver transportation options throughout the county. To meet this challenge, we offer a variety of public transportation services, including fixed-route service, ridesharing, paratransit service, Dial-a-Ride Transit, and community shuttles.
    [Show full text]
  • Study for a Centralized Application for Taxis in Montréal
    Study for a Centralized Application for Taxis in Montréal April, 2016 {11203650:1} Table of Contents About the Authors ......................................................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 4 I. BACKGROUND ON MONTREAL TAXICAB INDUSTRY .......................................................... 14 II. A UNIVERSAL APPLICATION ....................................................................................................... 21 III. UNIVERSAL APP EXPERIMENTS - OTHER JURISDICTIONS .................................................. 24 A. San Francisco, California ................................................................................................................ 24 B. Chicago, Illinois .............................................................................................................................. 28 C. Los Angeles, California .................................................................................................................. 31 D. Montgomery County, Maryland ..................................................................................................... 32 E. New York City, New York ............................................................................................................. 36 F. Tampa, Florida ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Urbane Radverleihsysteme Erobern Osteuropa Funktioniert Ein
    Language: en | cz | de | fr | it Werte Leserin, Werter Leser, Seit dem ersten groß angelegten städtischen Radverleihsystem in Kopenhagen 1995, erleben diese Systeme einen regelrechten Boom. Seit 2007, dem Eröffnungsjahr von Systemen u.a. in Paris ( Vélib’ ), Barcelona ( Bicing ) oder Wien , hat sich das Konzept auf viele Städte in Osteuropa, Asien und Nord- sowie Südamerika ausgedehnt. Dieser sehr ausführliche Newsletter gliedert sich in zwei Teile: Zuerst wird ein Überblick über die aktuellen Entwicklungen und den Stand der Dinge vermittelt. Im zweiten Teil folgen zusätzliche Hintergrundinformationen zur Geschichte von urbanen Radverleihsystemen (inklusive einer Erklärung der ersten drei “System- Generationen”), der vierten Generation sowie der Systembetreiber. Sollten Sie diesen Teil zuerst lesen wollen, klicken Sie hier . Urbane Radverleihsysteme erobern Osteuropa Mobilitätsmanagement schlägt schön langsam auch in osteuropäischen Ländern Wurzeln und Radverleihsysteme sind eine Erfolgsgeschichte, zumal sie in immer mehr Städten implementiert werden. Im Folgenden einige Beispiele: Polen: Veturilo in Warschau (Nextbike, June 2012); Krakau plant einen Ausbau seines BikeOne (PL) aus 2008. Von 120 Rädern soll auf ein stadtweites, benutzerfreundlicheres Konzept aufgestockt werden. ( Lesen Sie mehr dazu ) Slowenien: Laibachs BicikeLJ konnte 16.200 Nutzerinnen in nur 2 Monaten verzeichnen (JCDecaux, 2011) Albanien: Ecovolis in Tirana – nicht automatisierte, personenbetreute vier Radstationen Source: www.eltis.org mit 40 Rädern (März 2011) Slowakei: Offert für ein automatisiertes Verleihsystem für Bratislava. Rumänien: Cyclotheque in Bukarest; “I love velo” in fünf rumänischen Städten (2010). Tschechien: Homeport Prague , u.a. auch mit Elektrorädern und Lastenrädern. Funktioniert ein Radverleihsystem in jeder Stadt? Im OBIS Handbuch , können Städte, die an Radverleihsystemen interessiert sind, von 51 analysierten öffentlichen Radverleihsystemen in 10 europäischen Ländern lernen und die kritischen Erfolgsfaktoren studieren.
    [Show full text]