A River Returns: Rewilding the Elwha River

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

FOREGROUND / WATER JUNE 2014 A RIVER RETURNS JUNE 2013 THE REWILDING OF THE ELWHA. BY KATHARINE LOGAN Elwha Klallam Tribe in Port An- geles, traveled to the headwaters rom across the Strait of Juan de country in the early 1970s. “Gor- F Fuca, the mountains of Washing- geous!” he remembers thinking. ton’s Olympic Peninsula are always “Except—there’s no salmon.” The JAN. 2012 changing. They loom huge and sharp absence of salmon at the source and white, or float in a band of blue of the Elwha and throughout 90 haze. Some days they disappear alto- mountain ridges I had come to see. percent of the river habitat was due gether. On an April afternoon, under If not for the snow, I like to think I to two high dams that blocked their nearly every kind of cloud scudding might have glimpsed—but maybe it’s route upstream. The salmon have across the sky, I drove off the Port not possible—about 45 miles south begun gradually to move up again, Angeles ferry and up and around and a little west, the country where and the river is reasserting itself at the nearest mountain to a lookout the cascades of six glaciers form the its estuary since the last of the dams on Hurricane Ridge. There, at more headwaters of the Elwha River. was demolished in September 2014, ABOVE than 5,000 feet, one of those clouds freeing the Elwha River and generat- The former Lake Mills was snowing thick and fast, obscur- Robert Elofson, who is now the river ing massive ecological change on a reservoir’s revegetation. ing in its white hush the pleated restoration director for the Lower scale people seldom see. CHENOWETH JOSHUA 66 / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE MAGAZINE JULY 2015 FOREGROUND / WATER STRAIT OF JUAN DE FUCA PORT ANGELES ELWHA DAM LEFT The Elwha Dam VANCOUVER demolition. CANADA UNITED STATES ELWHA RIVER GLINES CANYON DAM N SEPT. 2011 DETAIL AT RIGHT SEATTLE O 1.25 2.5 5 MILES The Elwha River once supported Elofson. “We had no say. But we electricity output: With the Olympic stocks of all the anadromous salmo- knew it was bad.” Peninsula connected to the power nid species native to the Pacific North- grid, the dams provided very little of west. An estimated 400,000 fish The annual salmon populations were the power the region used. OCT. 2011 teemed upriver annually to spawn, trapped in the lower five miles of a including large-bodied spring chi- river starved of sediment, nutrients, In 1992, Congress passed the El- nook weighing as much as a hundred woody debris, and even water itself. wha River Ecosystem and Fisheries pounds. In the lower river, salmon Fish numbers plummeted from Restoration Act, enabling the larg- sometimes thronged so thick the Klal- nearly 400,000 to less than 3,000, est dam removal project in history. lam fishers didn’t have to catch them; with stocks of some species falling Almost a decade passed in political they just had to startle the fish, and almost to zero. Downstream, the skirmishing, locally and in Wash- some would ride aground. Salmon complex ecosystem of the estuary ington, D.C., before a senator who provided food for hundreds of kinds eroded to bare cobbles. For the tribe was blocking funding for the project of animals in the river’s ecosystem, this ecological devastation destroyed was voted out of office. In September JAN. 2012 and for the forest itself, as salmon- the livelihood that had sustained the 2011, demolition began. By Septem- borne nutrients nourished trees miles Klallam people for thousands of years ber 2014, both dams were down, from the river’s edge. and lay at the heart of their culture. and, for the first time in more than 100 years, the Elwha River ran free. In the early 20th century, that In the decades that followed, tribal changed. In 1911 and 1927, private elders continued to voice objections The dams’ removal marked the end companies constructed two hydro- to the dams, and when relicensing of a struggle but by no means the electric dams across the river, five requirements brought the dams end of the story. The Elwha restora- and 13 miles from the river’s mouth, under scrutiny in the latter third of tion is the second-largest ecosystem which is about five miles west of Port the century, the tribe intervened. restoration project in the history of APR. 2012 Angeles. The first dam was 108 feet The first blow to the dams came the national park system after the high, and the second one was 210 when part of the foundation at the Florida Everglades, and it’s unlike feet high. Together the dams flooded lower dam gave way. Second, the anything attempted before. nearly 800 acres of the river valley, dams had conspicuously failed to including the site of the tribe’s cre- provide required fish passage, and “This is an enormous chance to ation story, and barred the salmon with 83 percent of the river basin study a complete restoration pro- from more than 90 percent of their lying within the Olympic National cess,” Elofson says. spawning habitat. Park, an increasing number of en- vironmentalists joined the cause. Different parts of the river’s ecosys- “Nobody knew about the plan to put The third strike was the diminish- tem are changing at different rates. JUNE 2012 a dam there until it happened,” says ing economic utility of the dams’ The inorganic components that MAPS ASLA, KATSMA, KATARINA (SERIES); LEFT SERVICE, PARK NATIONAL THE WITH COLLABORATION IN SYSTEMS VIDEO ERDMAN 68 / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE MAGAZINE JULY 2015 FOREGROUND / WATER SEPT. 2011 JUNE 2012 ABOVE define the landscape’s form have cubic meters, had backed up behind tional Park Service, based in Port The former Lake changed faster than the rest, and are the dams. When the dams were re- Angeles. “There are no primary suc- Aldwell reservoir. expected to settle down faster, too, moved, and the river cut through cessional landscapes out there with BELOW says Jonathan Warrick, a research ge- the former lake beds to find its new five feet of silt like we have on the The Glines Dam demolition. ologist with the U.S. Geological Sur- channel, it carried 13 million cubic valley walls. And there are no sand vey. “The river has been very efficient meters of sediment down to the es- and gravel terraces instantly perched BOTTOM RIGHT The dam stub, in moving sediment,” he says, “and tuary in a series of chocolate milk above a riverbed.” now a lookout point. we’re seeing new, emergent land- torrents, leaving the remainder of scapes throughout the system—in the sediment perched in terraces 20 So the revegetation team’s strategy was the reservoirs, throughout the river to 60 feet above the riverbed. simply to plant out some 400,000 corridor below, and into the coast.” plants of 80 early successional native That gave the revegetation team a lot species, without any assumptions as Upstream from the dam sites, those to think about. to what would thrive, running the 800 formerly inundated acres have program over seven years to give the resurfaced but are nothing like what “There aren’t any analogues to these site time to teach them. they were before. A century’s worth conditions,” says Joshua Chenoweth, of sediment, more than 21 million a restoration botanist with the Na- Chenoweth calls the results of the re- SEPT. 2011 vegetation effort so far “a tale of two surfaces,” and, from a windy outlook on a stub of the upper dam, it’s easy to see why. The forest edge defines the old lake level like a vast bathtub ring. Within that, the valley walls are a clear success. A 92 percent survival rate for plantings, helped by plentiful wind-borne reseeding from the adjacent forest, has greened JAN. 2012 the silted slopes with alder, willow, cottonwood, and little Douglas firs. “It actually turned out to be a re- ally good site,” Chenoweth says. So much so that the revegetation of the valley walls will complete a year ahead of schedule. The instant, perched terraces are OCT. 2012 APR. 2015 another story. High above the water RIGHT BOTTOM SERVICE, PARK NATIONAL (SERIES); LEFT BOTTOM SERVICE, PARK NATIONAL THE WITH COLLABORATION IN SYSTEMS VIDEO ERDMAN RIGHT; AND LEFT TOP CHENOWETH, JOSHUA 70 / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE MAGAZINE JULY 2015 FOREGROUND / WATER level, far from the forest edge, with creeping up since the dams came More used to the ocean, I find the no soil to speak of, only lupines are down. Over the course of the 20th fast-flowing water fascinates me and really thriving. Great big Seussian century, river management practices makes me a bit uneasy at the same tufts of them are springing up, fix- of burning and clearing logjams and time. I stood back from the edge and ing their own nitrogen, setting flow- bulldozing the river channel com- looked around. Positioned at inter- ers, and scattering seed. Among the pounded the dams’ impact on wa- vals on both sides of the river was lupines, a few cottonwoods, ocean ter, sediment, and wood starvation. a series of giant wooden artifacts: spray, and snowberries are holding The tribe’s fisheries habitat manager, intriguing, strangely beautiful, not- on, but the terraces are still 80 per- Mike McHenry, says those practices quite-natural structures. They are cent bare ground. grossly simplified the channel of the engineered logjams, McHenry said, lower Elwha. and they are making a significant They may be slow going, but Che- difference to salmon habitat in the noweth is confident that in time the To help restore fish habitat, the tribe lower river.
Recommended publications
  • Age Structure and Hatchery Fraction of Elwha River Chinook Salmon: 2015 Carcass Survey Report

    Age Structure and Hatchery Fraction of Elwha River Chinook Salmon: 2015 Carcass Survey Report

    STATE OF WASHINGTON June 2016 Age Structure and Hatchery Fraction of Elwha River Chinook Salmon: 2015 Carcass Survey Report by Josh Weinheimer1, Joseph Anderson1, Randy Cooper1, Scott Williams1, Mike McHenry2, Patrick Crain3, Sam Brenkman3 and Heidi Hugunin3 1 Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 2 Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe 3 Olympic National Park Washington Department of FISH AND WILDLIFE Fish Program Fish Science Division FPA 16-04 Age structure and hatchery fraction of Elwha River Chinook Salmon: 2015 Carcass Survey Report Prepared by: Josh Weinheimer1, Joseph Anderson1, Randy Cooper1, Scott Williams1, Mike McHenry2, Patrick Crain3, Sam Brenkman3 and Heidi Hugunin3 1 Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife 2 Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe 3 Olympic National Park June 2016 Acknowledgements Collecting carcasses from a large system like the Elwha River watershed involves a tremendous amount of work and dedication. We would like to thank the following individuals from various agencies that assisted with the surveys: Matthew Choowong, Henry Kei, Andrew Simmons, Chris O’Connell and Pete Topping from WDFW; Anna Geffre with Olympic National Park; Sonny Sampson, Gabe Youngman, Wilson Wells and Randall McCoy from Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe. We would also like to thank Troy Tisdale, Vern Madison, and Jeff Gufler from WDFW for their assistance with samples collected at the Elwha Rearing Channel and fecundity measurements at the Hurd Creek Hatchery. Thanks to the WDFW Ageing, Thermal Otolith, and CWT laboratories for sample analysis. Funding for this project was provided by the National Park Service under contract P15PX02717. Executive Summary Monitoring the recolonization of Pacific salmon and steelhead following the removal of two dams is a critical component of the Elwha Restoration Project.
  • Final Environmental Impact Statement

    Final Environmental Impact Statement

    Final Environmental Impact Statement Elwha River Ecosystem Restoration Implementation Purpose and Need: The Elwha River ecosystem and native anadromous fisheries are severely degraded as a result of two hydroelectric dams (projects) and their reservoirs built in the early 1900s. Congress has mandated the full restoration of this ecosystem and its native anadromous fisheries through the Elwha River Ecosystem and Fisheries Restoration Act (Public Law 102-495). The Department of the Interior has found there is a need to return this river and the ecosystem to its natural, self-regulating state, and proposes to implement the Congressional mandate by removing both dams in a safe, environmentally sound and cost effective manner and implementing fisheries and ecosystem restoration planning. Only dam removal would fully restore the ecosystem or its native anadromous fisheries. Proposed Action: The U.S. Department of the Interior proposes to fully restore the Elwha River ecosystem and native anadromous fisheries through the removal of Elwha Dam and Glines Canyon Dam and implementing fish restoration and revegetation. Dam removal would occur over a 2-year period. Elwha Dam would be removed by blasting, and Glines Canyon Dam by a combination of blasting and diamond wire saw cutting. Lake Aldwell would be drained by a diversion channel, and Lake Mills by notching down Glines Canyon Dam. Stored sediment would be eroded naturally by the Elwha River. The proposed action is located in Clallam County, on the Olympic Peninsula, in Washington State. Lead/Cooperating agencies: The National Park Service is the lead agency. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, U.S.
  • Steelhead Response to the Removal of the Elwha River Dams

    Steelhead Response to the Removal of the Elwha River Dams

    Steelhead response to the removal of the Elwha River Dams Photo by John McMillan Pacific Coast Steelhead Management Conference March 22 2018 Walla Walla, WA Acknowledgements Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe Mike McHenry, Ray Moses, Larry Ward, Mel Elofson, Sonny Sampson, Wilson Wells, John Mahan, Doug Morill, Robert Dohrn, Randall McCoy, Matt Beirne National Park Service Brian Winter, Anna Geffre, Josh Geffre, Heidi Hugunin, Phil Kennedy, Sam Brenkman, Pat Crain, Kathryn Sutton NOAA Fisheries George Pess, Martin Liermann, Todd Bennett, Steve Corbett, Oleksandr Stefankiv, Amilee Wilson, Zach Hughes, Tim Tynan, Eric Ward USGS Jeff Duda, Andy Ritchie, Chris Curran, Amy East, Jon Warrick Trout Unlimited WDFW US Fish and Wildlife Service John McMillan Joe Anderson, Chris O’Connell, Randy Roger Peters US Bureau of Reclamation Cooper, Mike Gross, Andrew Claiborne & K Denton & Associates Jennifer Bountry, Tim Randle WDFW Fish Ageing Laboratory Keith Denton Elwha River 833 km2 watershed Elwha Dam • built 1913 • 32 m tall • River km 8 Glines Canyon Dam • Built 1927 • 64 m tall • River km 21 Pess et al. 2008 NW Science 115 km of habitat upstream of Elwha Dam site Photo montage compiled by George Pess Photos from NPS time lapse camera Photo montage compiled by George Pess Photos from NPS time lapse camera Sediment release • 21 million m3 of sediment stored in former reservoirs • 16 million m3 in Lake Mills (upstream of Glines) • 5 million m3 in Lake Aldwell (upstream of Elwha) • Approximately two-thirds evacuated from former reservoirs • 90% delivered to
  • Ryan Hilperts Masters Thesis Final July 6

    Ryan Hilperts Masters Thesis Final July 6

    The Elwha River Restoration: Challenges and Opportunities for Community Engagement by Ryan Laurel Hilperts B.A., Western Washington University, 2001 A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the School of Environmental Studies Ryan Laurel Hilperts, 2010 University of Victoria All rights reserved. This thesis may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. ii The Elwha River Restoration: Challenges and Opportunities for Community Engagement by Ryan Laurel Hilperts B.A., Western Washington University, 2001 Supervisory Committee Dr. Eric Higgs, Supervisor (School of Environmental Studies) Dr. Jenny Feick, Departmental Member (School of Environmental Studies) Dr. Peter Stephenson, Outside Member Department of Anthropology) iii Supervisory Committee Dr. Eric Higgs, Supervisor (School of Environmental Studies) Dr. Jenny Feick, Departmental Member (School of Environmental Studies) Dr. Peter Stephenson, Outside Member (Department of Anthropology) Abstract As ecological restoration expands as a practice, so does the complexity, cost, and scale of many projects. Higgs (2003) terms these projects technological and argues they limit meaningful community focal restoration practices, one component of good ecological restoration. The planned removals of two large dams on the Elwha River in Washington State provide a case study to investigate this theory. I conducted 18 in-depth interviews with community leaders and restoration practitioners in order to explore the question, “How do technological restoration projects enable or constrain community engagement, and in the case of the Elwha River, how might such engagement be enlarged?” This interpretive study suggests that technological restoration projects, particularly when managed by federal agencies, expand engagement through a broadened 1) public audience and 2) suite of engagement activities.
  • Salmon Vs. Dams: the Dam Removal Debate on the Elwha River

    Salmon Vs. Dams: the Dam Removal Debate on the Elwha River

    Salmon vs. Dams: The Dam Removal Debate on the Elwha River Teachers: This lesson contains a classroom project with background related to the AFG video clips about salmon vs. dams. These parts may be used individually or together, depending on the needs of your class. Note: You can access and view the video clips used in this lesson in the Teacher Resources section of the AFG Web site www.pbs.org/americanfieldguide/teachers. Grade Level: 10-12 Background Hydroelectric Power has long been touted as a clean alternative source of energy. It produces roughly 70% of the power in the Pacific Northwest. However, hydroelectric is not without its costs. Salmon runs on the major river systems, such as the Columbia River, and on minor rivers, such as the Elwha River in Olympic National Park, have suffered greatly in recent decades, and some of these salmon species are becoming listed as endangered or threatened species. Today, large dams on the Columbia River, owned by the Bonneville Power Administration (BPA) provide the majority of power for the Pacific Northwest. Yet hundreds of small, privately owned dams are scattered around the region. These are in various states of disrepair, and often only provide enough power to fuel a small community or one or two factories. However, these dams do as much or more damage to the salmon runs in their area than the large dams (BPA dams have extensive programs to help the fish successfully navigate the dams). This lesson is derived from real testimony given to Congress regarding two of these small dams in the pristine Olympic National Park in Washington.
  • Elwha River Restoration

    Elwha River Restoration

    OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MINING AND RECLAMATION reclamationmatters Fall 2018 Elwha River Restoration Mitigation Banks in Mine Permitting and Reclamation The Flight 93 National Memorial Reforestation Project Highlights of the 2018 ASMR St. Louis Conference Be a PROUD Steward of a Beautiful Hardwood Forest 1 2 3 Hardwood Seedlings and Support Contact Your Prepare Your Feel Proud for Plantations, Conservation and Reforestation Land & Plant and Reclamation, and Wildlife Advisor Your Seedlings Condent Highest Quality Hardwood Species Trusted By Private Environmental Mitigation County, State and Landowners Consultants Bankers Federal Government Institutions Tree Non-Prot Wildlife Industry Planters Conservation Groups Biologists ArborGen.com 2 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MINING AND RECLAMATION s Fall 2018 The Reforestation Advantage 855.894.1702 reclamation In this issue matters Message from the President ........................................................................ 4 is published by DEL Communications Inc. Editor’s Message - I’m Still Listening ........................................................... 6 www.delcommunications.com Wild Women of Reclamation – St. Louis, Missouri 2018 ........................... PRESIDENT 8 David Langstaff Haulin’ ASMR 2018 ...................................................................................10 PUBLISHER Jason Stefanik Mitigation Banks in Mine Permitting and Reclamation ...........................11 MANAGING EDITOR Pioneer of Reclamation Award ..................................................................14
  • Elwha River Restoration Site Bulletin 2012

    Elwha River Restoration Site Bulletin 2012

    Learn More About Elwha River Restoration 1 Lower Elwha Klallam 6 Feiro Marine Life Center Tribal Center 1 Interact with Elwha exhibits that Walk the 0.7 mile Warrior Path loop to feature a hands-on model of Glines Canyon Dam and Lake Mills. the Elwha River estuary. 6 Lower Elwha Road 315 N. Lincoln Street 2 Elwha River Bridge 2 7 Museum at the Carnegie 7 Cross the Elwha River bridge to get a Elwha River Learn about the historic Elwha Valley, birds eye view the river and connect to Bridge including Glines Canyon and Elwha the Olympic Discovery Trail. Elwha River dams, through informative exhibits. Elwha River Road Road 207 South Lincoln Street 3 3 Elwha Dam Viewpoint 8 Port Angeles Library Surround yourself with art created Stroll a short trail to an overlook to Port Angeles view ecosystem restoration at the Lake Aldwell for the September 2011 ceremony Former 9 Library celebrating the beginning of dam former site of the Elwha Dam. Delta Access 8 Lake Aldwell removal. June - Labor Day 2012 Lower Dam Road (drained) Elwha River Viewpoint 2210 South Peabody 4 4 Elwha River Viewpoint 9 Olympic National Park Observe a changing landscape where Visitor Center the Elwha River flows through the site View exhibits and ask a ranger about of the former Lake Aldwell reservoir. Elwha River Restoration updates. Highway 101 3002 Mount Angeles Road 5 5 Elwha Valley 10 Hurricane Ridge Experience Elwha Valley, with its Visitor Center spectacular river views and easy Enjoy vistas of the Elwha Valley and access to Madison Falls and other 10 surrounding mountains.
  • Reclamation Annual UAS Report: Fiscal Year 2012

    Reclamation Annual UAS Report: Fiscal Year 2012

    Reclamation Annual UAS Report: Fiscal Year 2012 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Technical Service Center Denver, Colorado September 2012 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Reclamation Annual UAS Report: Fiscal Year 2012 prepared by Emergency Management and GIS Group Douglas R. Clark U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Technical Service Center Denver, Colorado September 2012 Contents Contents Page I. Background 1 II. Research Goals and Objectives 2 III. Accomplishments 2 IV. Findings 8 V. The Path Forward 10 VI. Appendix A 11 VII. Appendix B 16 iii Acknowledgments Acknowledgements Several individuals were instrumental in developing the data and analysis needed for this study. Suggestions and guidance by Mike Hutt (USGS), Jeff Sloan (USGS), Mark Bauer (USGS), Lance Brady (USGS), and Jade Soddell (USBR), throughout this study are gratefully acknowledged. v Reclamation Annual UAS Report: Fiscal Year 2012 Background Just prior to FY2012 Reclamation hosted its first UAS conference entitled Applications of Near Remote Sensing and Unmanned Airborne Vehicles for Water Resources Management at the Denver Federal Center. Representatives from NASA (http://water.jpl.nasa.gov/), the USGS (http://rmgsc.cr.usgs.gov/UAS/), Utah State University (http://aggieair.usu.edu/aggie.html), and Time-Science (http://www.time-science.com/timescience/default.asp) made presentations touching on current developments in these technologies.
  • Elwha River Response to Dam Removals Through Four Years and a Big Flood

    Elwha River Response to Dam Removals Through Four Years and a Big Flood

    Elwha River response to dam removals through four years and a big flood: Lessons learned, channel response, and sediment effects from the world’s largest engineered dam removal Andy Ritchie – NPS Elwha Restoration Project Hydrologist Amy East – USGS Research Geologist, Santa Cruz (talk “ringer”) Acknowledgments • The Elwha River studies are a collaborative effort building upon the adaptive management program funded through the National Park Service – USGS – NOAA – Army Corps of Engineers – Bureau of Reclamation – USFWS – Elwha Klallam Tribe – University of Washington – Seattle University – Volunteers – Many others 2 Elwha River Olympic National Seattle Park 50 km Mt. Rainier Elwha watershed, Olympic Peninsula, WA Dam removal in the U.S. Impacts of dams on Elwha River fish Total population decline Shift in species composition All native populations are very low in abundance Data from George Pess, NOAA Natural erosion of reservoir sediment Lakes Aldwell and Mills stored 21 million m3 of sediment. Removal had to be: . Fast enough to limit impacts to fish . Slow enough to be tolerated by infrastructure downstream, and minimize floodplain deposition Former lakebed, Lake Mills reservoir Dam removal timeline Reservoirs at beginning of dam removal (1/2 full of sediment*) (1/3 full of sediment*) *Rough estimate based on starting pool volume, but some sediment was upstream of full pool. Reservoirs after a year of dam removal Dam complications • Changed conditions related to construction of both dams were not entirely addressed by dam removal • Fish
  • Genetic Population Structure of Olympic Peninsula Bull Trout Populations and Implications for Elwha Dam Removal Author(S) :Patrick W

    Genetic Population Structure of Olympic Peninsula Bull Trout Populations and Implications for Elwha Dam Removal Author(S) :Patrick W

    Genetic Population Structure of Olympic Peninsula Bull Trout Populations and Implications for Elwha Dam Removal Author(s) :Patrick W. DeHaan, Samuel J. Brenkman, Brice Adams, Patrick Crain Source: Northwest Science, 85(3):463-475. 2011. Published By: Northwest Scientific Association URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.3955/046.085.0305 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Patrick W. DeHaan1, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Abernathy Fish Technology Center, 1440 Abernathy Creek Road, Longview, Washington 98632 Samuel J. Brenkman, National Park Service, Olympic National Park, 600 East Park Avenue, Port Angeles, Washington 98362 Brice Adams, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Abernathy Fish Technology Center, 1440 Abernathy Creek Road, Longview, Washington 98632 Patrick Crain, National Park Service, Olympic National Park, 600 East Park Avenue, Port Angeles, Washington 98362 Genetic Population Structure of Olympic Peninsula Bull Trout Populations and Implications for Elwha Dam Removal Abstract In the Elwha River, two hydroelectric dams constructed nearly a century ago fragment previously continuous habitat and isolate migratory bull trout.
  • Large-Scale Dam Removal on the Elwha River, Washington, USA: Source-To-Sink Sediment Budget and Synthesis

    Large-Scale Dam Removal on the Elwha River, Washington, USA: Source-To-Sink Sediment Budget and Synthesis

    Geomorphology 246 (2015) 729–750 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Geomorphology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/geomorph Large-scale dam removal on the Elwha River, Washington, USA: Source-to-sink sediment budget and synthesis Jonathan A. Warrick a,⁎, Jennifer A. Bountry b, Amy E. East a, Christopher S. Magirl c, Timothy J. Randle b, Guy Gelfenbaum a, Andrew C. Ritchie d,GeorgeR.Pesse, Vivian Leung f, Jeffrey J. Duda g a U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Coastal and Marine Science Center, Santa Cruz, CA, USA b Bureau of Reclamation, Sedimentation and River Hydraulics Group, Denver, CO, USA c U.S. Geological Survey, Washington Water Science Center, Tacoma, WA, USA d National Park Service, Olympic National Park, Port Angeles, WA, USA e National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, Seattle, WA, USA f University of Washington, Department of Earth & Space Sciences, Seattle, WA, USA g U.S. Geological Survey, Western Fisheries Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA article info abstract Article history: Understanding landscape responses to sediment supply changes constitutes a fundamental part of many problems Received 7 August 2014 in geomorphology, but opportunities to study such processes at field scales are rare. The phased removal of two large Received in revised form 13 January 2015 dams on the Elwha River, Washington, exposed 21 ± 3 million m3, or ~30 million tonnes (t), of sediment that had Accepted 15 January 2015 been deposited in the two former reservoirs, allowing a comprehensive investigation
  • Elwha River's Return to Nature

    Elwha River's Return to Nature

    Dam Removal Elwha River’s Return to Nature Bill Jones he removal of two dams from the Elwha River on the Olympic TPeninsula between 2011 and 2014 were the largest dam removals in the world at the time. A project of this magnitude and importance should be included in this issue of LakeLine with its theme of “Dam Removal.” Unfortunately, we could find no one in multiple federal or state agencies, or in universities willing and able to write this article. Therefore, I have prepared the following based upon previously published materials. Setting The Elwha River is located in the northern half of Washington’s Olympic Peninsula (Figure 1). It is only 45 miles long, from its source high in the Olympic Mountains to its mouth on the Strait of Juan de Fuca, but includes over 100 miles of tributaries. The river flows south to north through old growth forests sustained by 60 to 80 inches of rain per year. About 83 percent of the watershed lies within Olympic National Park (Sadin et al. 2011). The river historically supported a rich and diverse anadromous (fish that spawn in freshwater but live in saltwater) salmonid population. Prior to hydropower development, the Elwha was one of the few rivers in the lower U.S. that supported all the anadromous salmonids native to the Pacific Northwest: spring and summer-fall run Chinook (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), coho (O. kisutch), chum (O. keta), pink (O. gorbuscha), and sockeye (O. nerka) salmon; summer- and winter-run steelhead (O. mykiss); sea-run cutthroat trout (O. clarkii), Dolly Varden Figure 1.