Available online a t www.scholarsresearchlibrary.com

Scholars Research Library

Annals of Biological Research, 2013, 4 (1):317-324 (http://scholarsresearchlibrary.com/archive.html)

ISSN 0976-1233 CODEN (USA): ABRNBW

Impact of physiographical factors on the species diversity in the Northern Zagros Forest (Case study, Province, Marivan region)

Mozhgan Bazyar 1, Maziar Haidari *2 and Naghi Shabanian 3, Reza Hossein Haidari 4

1M.Sc Graduate of forestry, University of Gilan, Some-sara, *2M.Sc. Graduated of forestry, University of Tehran, Karadj, I.R.Iran. 3Department of Forestry, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran 4Department of Forestry, University of Razi, Kermanshah, Iran ______

ABSTRACT

Zagros ecosystem is considered as one of the most important biological sites in the Iran. This research was investigated in the Marivan region, northern Zagros forest, and western Iranian state of Kurdistan. In this study 120 circle sample plots (500 m 2) were collected by random method in different aspect and altitude. In every sample plot the kind of species and number of trees and shrub were recorded. In the sample plots the micro plots of 5 m by 5 m (i.e. area of 25 m 2) were designed and Herbaceous and shrub information was recorded then. Aspect, slope and altitude divided the four, three and three classes. Species diversity indexes including Shannon Simpson (1-D) and Margaleff (R 1) were used to evaluate plant diversity in each sample plot. The ,(׳ Wiener (H means of different between diversity indexes in the aspect, slop and altitude class were estimated by ANOVA and DUNCAN test. Data analyzing was done by Past and Ecological Methodological software’s. Results showed the tree, shrub and herbaceous species belonged to 29 families and 80 species were identified in the study area. That Rosaceae and families have the highest number of woody species. Moreover, Compositae and Gramineae families were most abundant amongst herbaceous species . The increasing of altitude decreased species diversity. A significant different was observed for diversity index in aspect, slope and altitude classes. Therefore, in order by increasing of altitude the plant diversity decreased, higher of plant diversity observed in the northern aspect, 0– 30 percentage slope and 1400 to 1800 meter a.s.l. classes.

Kay words: altitude, aspect, physiographical factors, Slope, species diversity, Zagros Forest ______

INTRODUCTION

With due attention to climate conditions of Iran that 65% area includes arid and semi-aired and degradation rapid of north and west, because of degradation of natural resources will cause to degradation agricultural lands and human environmental [5]. Forests cover about 12 million ha in Iran [8], including 5 million ha in the mountainous Zagros region. This forest extends from Turkey and into Northeastern and Southeastern Iran (between Azerbaijan and Fars Province). Zagros is typically characterized by a semi-humid climate with extremely cold winters and annual precipitation exceeding 800 mm. The main species in this region are Quercus spp. (), Pistacia mutica (wild pistachio), Crategus spp. and Pyrus spp [9]. The Zogros Mountains are divided into two 317

Scholars Research Library Maziar Haidari et al Annals of Biological Research, 2013, 4 (1):317-324 ______parts: northern and southern. The northern Zagros is consisted of the growing site of Quercus infectoria Oliv. And also Q.libani Oliv. And Q.persica J. & Sp. ( Q.brantii Lindl.) species are found in this part. However, the southern Zagros is included Q.persica site which it extended to Fars province (i.e., 29º 5´ N). The northern Zagros is wetter and cooler than the southern one [19]. Physiographic is abbreviation of Physical Geography, means surface shapes of a region [15]. That has many effects on plant diversity and their variance [4]. Different researches have considered the biodiversity through considering to physiographic [3 and 20], or each one of physiographic different factors in separate aspect such as height from the sea surface [22], slope or direction or combining two slop and direction factors [21]. The study of plant diversity in the zagros forest showed in the northern since there is 165 woody species (tree and shrub) in Zagros and 182 bush and herbaceous species only in northern Zagros [12]. Investigated of biodiversity in relation to physiographical factors in mountain forest in Iran and results showed that species diversity was the greatest at north aspect and slopes less than 30% has the most amounts. Factor of altitude from the sea level did not have meaningful relation with species diversity [10]. Study of the biodiversity of Vegetation Species in Relation to Environmental Factors in Different Aspects of Zagros forest and Results showed that by increasing the altitude, the species diversity and richness are increased [14]. study on the herb Layer biodiversity in relation to physiographical factors in south of Zagros forest ecosystem and results showed that low altitudes class 1600>, south aspect and less 30 percentage have maximum the plant diversity [11]. The research investigated on the Impact of physiographic and human factors on crown cover and diversity of woody species in the Zagros forests (Kermanshah province) and Results showed that by increasing the altitude, the species diversity and richness are increased. Results showed that in the northern slopes and 25-60 percent slop category, the crown cover and species diversity were maximum [16]. Study of relationship between plant diversity and physiographic factors in Ghalarang protected area and results showed that northern aspect have higher plant diversity and while 4 trees, 3 shrubs, one bush and 78 herbaceous species were identified in Ilam forests of Zagros [18]. Study of floristic and plant species diversity of the Lebanon site (Quercus libani) in the western Iran and results showed the mean diversities were found the highest in northern and northwestern and lowest in northeastern aspect in the shrub layer. Moreover, Mean richness and diversity were found the highest in 1500 m a.s.l. and lowest in 1750 and 1800 m a.s.l. in the tree and shrub layers. Mean richness and diversity were found the highest in 1500 m a.s.l. and lowest in 1750 m a.s.l. in the regeneration layer. Also, the mean diversities were found the highest in elevation 1700 m a.s.l. and lowest in elevation 1800 m a.s.l. in the herbaceous layer [19]. The aim of this study was to determine effect of physiographical factors on the plant species diversity in the Marivan region, Kurdistan Province, Northern Zagros Forest west of Iran.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Figure 1. Study site location in the Kurdistan Province, Zagros region, Western Iranian state of Iran

318

Scholars Research Library Maziar Haidari et al Annals of Biological Research, 2013, 4 (1):317-324 ______

Site description Iranian habitats support about 8000 species of flowering (i.e. belonging to 167 families and 1200 genera), of which almost 1700 are endemic [6]. The Zagros Mountains are divided into two parts of northern and southern. The northern Zagros is consisted of the growing site of Quercus infectoria Oliv and somewhat Q.libani Oliv and Q.persica J. & Sp. ( Q.brantii Lindl.) can be observed. The northern Zagros is wetter and cooler than the southern one (12).This research was investigated in the Komarlang district, Marivan region, northern Zagros forest, and western Iranian state of Kurdistan (Figure 1). Komarlang village is located in north of Marivan city and the 200 hectare of conventional territory of this village was selected. The forests are located between 1150 and 1920 m a.s.l. Mean annual precipitation is 909.5 mm, ranging from 590.8 to 1422.2 mm, Mean annual temperature is 13.3º C, and the length of dry season is 4 month (based on embrothermic curve) from June to August. Type of climate is sub humid with cold winters in the basis of Emberger’s formula [19].

In this study 120 circle sample plots (500 m 2) were collected by random method. In every sample plot the kind of species and number of trees and shrub were recorded. In the sample plots the micro plots of 5 m by 5 m (i.e. area of 25 m2) were designed and Herbaceous and shrub information was recorded then. Slope of the region was divided into three class: gently sloping (less than 30%), average sloping (30-50%) and high slopping (more than 50%), and the altitude was divided into tree class (class1: less 1400; class 2: 1400 – 1800 and class 3: more 1800 meter) and geographical aspect was divided into the main directions (North, East, South and West aspect). Species Simpson (1-D) and Margaleff (R1) were used to evaluate plant ,(׳ diversity indexes including Shannon Wiener (H diversity in each sample plot. The means of different between diversity indexes in the aspect, slop and high level sea class were estimated by Anova and Duncan test. Data analyzing was done by Past and Ecological Methodological software’s.

Table 1: Biodiversity Indices used in this paper

Indices References Equation * [17] (׳ s (H׳ Shannon

Simpson (1-D) [17]

Margaleff (R 1) [7]

*S and pi refer to total number of species in the sample and proportion of individuals in the species, respectively.

RESULTS

Calculation and comparison of different indices of diversity, as a favorite method is considered for study on biodiversity [2]. The assessment of biodiversity in forest has become an important issue for studying ecosystems and their conservation [1].

Table 2. List of plant species (Tree, Shrub and Herbaceous) in the studied areas

Species and families layer Vegetation Quercus libani Oliv . (Fagaceae), Quercus infectoria Oliv. ( Fagaceae), Quercus Brantii Lindl . (Fagaceae), Tree Acer Monspessulanum L. Subsp. cinerascens (Boiss). ( Aceraceae), Pistacia atlantica Subsp Kurdica . (Anacardiaceae), Amygdalus Communis L. ( Rosaceae), Crataegus sp. ( Rosaceae). Lonicera nummularifolia Jaub & spach .( Caprifoliaceae), Cotoneaster nummularius Fisch & Mey .( Shrub Rosaceae), Pyrus communis L. ( Rosaceae), Daphne mucronata Royle . ( Thymelaceae), Fraxinus rotundifolia Miller. (Oleaceae), Sorbus graeca Spach. (Rosacea), Rhus coriaria L. (Anacardiaceae), 319

Scholars Research Library Maziar Haidari et al Annals of Biological Research, 2013, 4 (1):317-324 ______

Juniperus sp. (Cupressaceae), Cerasus mahalab L. (Rosaceae). Achillea millefolium L. (Compositae), Adonis sp. (Compositae), Aegilops sp . (Gramineae), Agropyrum cristatum L.(Gramineae), Alcea sp. (Malvaceae), Papaver orientalis. (Papaveraceae), Anemon sp. (Ranunculaceae). Vicia variabilis. (Pappilionaceae), Anthemis tinctoria L. (Compositae), Arum elongatum Stev. (Araceae), Lactuca serriola. (Compositae), Astragalus sp . (Pappilionaceae), Avena sp. (Gramineae), Trifolium repens. ( Pappilionaceae), Boissiera sp. ( Crucifereae), Bromus tectorum L. (Gramineae), Bellevalia pycantha. (Liliaceae), Carex sp .( Cyperaceae), Capsella draba L. (Crucifereae), Alyssum sp. (Crucifereae), Eryngium billardieri F. (Umbelliferae), Campanula sp .( Campanulaceae), Hordeom violaceum. ( Herb Gramineae), Centaurea spp. ( Compositae), Malva neglecta Wallr .( Malvaceae), Rumex sp.( Polygonaceae), Salvia sp. ( Labiateae), Convolvolus arveniss L. ( Convolvulaceae), Crepis sp. (Compositae), Dactylis glomerata L.( Gramineae), Geranium tuberosum L. (Graninaceae), Erodium sp. (Graninaceae), Ferula spp. (Umbelliferae), Fibigia Medicus. ( Cruciferae), Crepis sanctus. ( Compositae), Salvia indica. ( Labiateae), Roemeria Medic. ( Papaveraceae), Scabiosa spp. (Dipsacaceous), Heilanthemum ledifolium L. (Cistaceae), Rosa canina. (Rosacea), Smyrniopsis aucheri. (Umbelliferae), Hypericum sp. (Hypericaceae), Lamium album L. (Labiateae), Lathyrus sp. (Pappilionaceae), Medicago spp . (Pappilionaceae), Taeniatherum crinitum. (Gramineae), Poa spp. (Gramineae), Polygonum sp .( Polygonaceae), Stipa sp. (Gramineae), Ziziphora tenuir L.(Gramineae), Vaccaria sp .(Caryophyllaceae), Trifolium purpureum . (Pappilionaceae), Taraxacum sp. (Compositae) , Gundelia tournefortii. (Compositae), Lotus sp. (Pappilionaceae), Fumaria asepala. (Fumariaceae), Trapogon sp. (Compositae), Teucrium sp .(Labiateae) , Phlomis sp. (Labiateae), Onobrychis cornuta L.(Pappilionaceae), Hibiscus sp. (Malvaceae), Cuscuta spp. (Cuscutaceae), Allium sp. (Liliaceae) and Bellis sp. (Compositae).

The Tree species identified in the region studied belonged to seven tree species in the four Families. In this forest have 80 plant species, which consist of 7 trees, 9 shrubs and 64 herbaceous species. (Table 2).

Figure 2. The number of plant species in the plant family in the study area

The tree, shrub and herbaceous species belonged to 29 families and 80 species were identified in the study area (Table 2). thus for the classes of Compositae, Gramineae, Pappilionaceae, Rosacae and Labiateae, eleven, nine, eight, seven and seven species were existed and have largest number of species, respectively (Figure 3). Plant species diversity of three growth layers was obtained in terms of different aspects.

320

Scholars Research Library Maziar Haidari et al Annals of Biological Research, 2013, 4 (1):317-324 ______

Figure 3. Mean diversity index in the: (a) Tree, (b) Shrub, (c) herbaceous, (d) Tree, (e) Shrub and (f) herbaceous layer of the aspect and slope class.

The mean diversities were highest in northern and lowest in western aspects in the tree, shrub and herbaceous layer. The ANOVA test indicated that there were significant differences mean Shannon (H) and Margaleff (R) index in the aspects classes (P > 0.05) (table 3). The mean diversities were highest in 0 – 30 percentage and lowest in more 50 percentage in the tree, shrub and herbaceous layer. The ANOVA test indicated that there were significant differences mean Shannon (H) and Margaleff (R) index in the slope classes (P > 0.05) (table 3), but Simpson index no significant differences mean in the slopes and aspects classes.

321

Scholars Research Library Maziar Haidari et al Annals of Biological Research, 2013, 4 (1):317-324 ______

Figure 4. Mean diversity index in the: (a) Tree, (b) Shrub and (c) herbaceous layer of the High Level Sea class.

Table 3.The results ANOVA analysis to compere the mean plant diversity index in aspect, slope and High Level Sea classes.

physiographical vegetation Diversity index DF Mean F Sig. factors laye r Square Shannon (H) 3 0.341 10.341 0.000 ** Tree layer Simpson (1 -D) 3 0.043 2.908 0.064 ns ** Margaleff (R 1) 3 0.435 13.672 0.000 Shannon (H) 3 0.421 13.061 0.000 ** Aspect class shrub layer Simpson (1-D) 3 0.0231 3.008 .094 ns ** Margaleff (R 1) 3 0.532 15.913 0.000 Shannon (H) 3 1.451 11.071 0.000 ** herbaceous Simpson (1-D) 3 0.32 2.561 0.076 ns ** layer Margaleff (R 1) 3 2.014 14.673 0.000 Shannon (H) 2 0.463 11.045 0.000 ** Tree layer Simpson (1-D) 2 0.0243 3.324 0.049 * ** Margaleff (R 1) 2 0.836 10.342 0.000 Shannon (H) 2 0.480 8.351 0.000 ** Slop class shrub layer Simpson (1 -D) 2 0.0456 2.054 0.063 ns ** Margaleff (R 1) 2 0.934 7.538 0.000 Shannon (H) 2 1.264 15.691 0.000 ** herbaceous Simpson (1 -D) 2 0.38 3.65 0.061 ns ** layer Margaleff (R 1) 2 2.153 13.241 0.000 Shannon (H) 2 0.546 10.086 0.000 ** Tree layer Simpson (1-D) 2 0.0453 2.435 0.076 ns ** Margaleff (R 1) 2 0.638 9.987 0.000 Shannon (H) 2 0.401 9.724 0.000 ** High Level Sea shrub layer Simpson (1-D) 2 0.035 3.103 0.6 ns class ** Margaleff (R 1) 2 0.386 8.056 0.000 Shannon (H) 2 1.465 18.874 0.000 ** herbaceous Simpson (1 -D) 2 0.39 3.143 0.051 ns ** layer Margaleff (R 1) 2 2.013 16.873 0.000 * Different letters indicate significant differences in 5% level, ** Different letters indicate significant differences in 1% level. 322

Scholars Research Library Maziar Haidari et al Annals of Biological Research, 2013, 4 (1):317-324 ______The mean diversities were highest in 1400 to 1800 m and lowest in more 1800 meter High Level Sea class in the tree, shrub and herbaceous layer. The ANOVA test indicated that there were significant differences mean Shannon (H) and Margaleff (R) index in the High Level Sea classes ( P > 0.05) (table 3), but Simpson (1-D) index no significant differences mean in the High Level Sea classes.

Result table 3 indicated the differences between mean Shannon (H) and Margaleff (R 1) diversity indexes in the aspect, slope and High Level Sea classes were statistically significant and differences between mean Simpson (1- D) diversity index in the aspect, slope and High Level Sea classes not statistically significant.

DISCUSSION

Biodiversity measurement is recognized as guidance for conservation plans in local scale. Species biodiversity is used greatly in vegetation studies, and environmental evaluation is one of the main criteria to determine ecosystems condition [13]. All three calculated indices in this study have been mentioned as the most applicable indices (2 and 15). A total of 80 plant species were found in the studied area, of which 16 woody species (7 trees, 9 shrubs) and 63 herbaceous species existed (Table 1) while 4 trees, 3 shrubs, one bush and 78 herbaceous species were identified in Ilam forests of Zagros (Pourbabaei et al. 2010). Therefore, it is concluded that tree richness is high in the studied area. Also, it can be deduced from Table 2 that Rosaceae and Fagaceae families play an important role in among woody species. Moreover, Compositae and Gramineae families were most abundant amongst herbaceous species . Results showed in this study area Compositae family have higher number of species in the study area (Figure 2). The mean diversities were highest in northern and lowest in western aspects in the tree, shrub and herbaceous layer. The ANOVA test indicated that there were significant differences mean Shannon (H) and Margaleff (R) index in the aspects classes ( P > 0.05) (table 3). These results were confirmed by Hashemi and Babaei Kafaki, 2009 [10], Parma and Shataee Jouybari, 2010 [16], Pourbabaei et al, 2010 [18] and Pourbabaei and Navgran, 2011 [19]. The mean diversities were highest in 0 – 30 percentage and lowest in more 50 percentage in the tree, shrub and herbaceous layer. The ANOVA test indicated that there were significant differences mean Shannon (H) and Margaleff (R) index in the slope classes ( P > 0.05) (table 3), but Simpson index no significant differences mean in the slopes and aspects classes. These results were confirmed by Hashemi and Babaei Kafaki, 2009 [10] and Heidari et al, 2010 [11] but, not are to be confirmed with gained results of Parma and Shataee Jouybari, 2010 [16].The highest mean of diversities were found the elevation 1400 to 1800 m a.s.l and the lowest in elevation more 1800 m a.s.l in the of tree, shrub and herb layer (Figure 10). There were significant differences among mean diversity indexes (i.e., Shannon (H) and Margaleff (R)) measures in the different elevations ( P > 0.05). These results not are to be confirmed with gained results of Zagros forests in Kermanshah province (Parma and Shataee Jouybari, 2010). These results are to be confirmed with gained results Heidari et al, 2010 [11] and Pourbabaei and Navgran, 2011[19] but, not are to be confirmed with gained result Parma and Shataee Jouybari, 2010 [19]. Result indicated the differences between mean Shannon (H) and Margaleff (R 1) diversity indexes in the aspect, slope and altitude classes were statistically significant and differences between mean Simpson (1-D) diversity index in the aspect, slope and altitude classes not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The increasing of altitude decreased species diversity. A significant different was observed for diversity index in aspect, slope and altitude classes. Therefore, in order by increasing of altitude the plant diversity decreased, higher of plant diversity (tree, shrub and herbaceous) observed in the northern aspect, 0 – 30 percentage slope and 1400 to 1800 meter a.s.l. classes.

Acknowledgements We thank Mr. Afshin maleki and Yaghob Maleki for their help in the field and we thank Mr. Nasrolahh Moradi Kor and Rahmat Namdari for their help in the analysis of data.

REFERENCES

[1] Aubert M; Alard D; Bureau F . Forest Ecol Manag , 2004 , 175, 321-337. [2] Baev PV; Penev LD; BIODIV. Program for calculating biological diversity parameters, similarity, niche overlap, 323

Scholars Research Library Maziar Haidari et al Annals of Biological Research, 2013, 4 (1):317-324 ______And cluster analysis. Version 5.1. Pensoft, 57: 1995 . [3] Baker M.E; Barnes B.V. Canadian Journal of Forest , 1998 , 28, 1405-1418. [4] Barnes B.V; Zak D.R; Denton S.R; Spurr S.H. Forest ecology, (4th ed.), John Wileyand Sons, Inc, 1998 , 773p. [5] Dastmalchi M. Jangal and Senoubar J , Inst. For. Ranglands Res , 1998 , 203, 168 (In Persian). [6] Eftekhari T, Ramezani M. National Botanical Research Institute, in dia, 2004, 39-40. [7] Ejtehadi H; Sepehry A; Akkafi HR. Method of measuring biodiversity. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Publication, 2009 , No. 530. Mashhad, IR Iran. [8] Forest and Rangeland Organization. Strategies for sustainable forest management in Zagros forests, Technical Report, 2002 , Forest and Rangeland Organization, Teheran. [9] Ghazanfari H; Namiranian M; Sobhani H; Marvi Mohajer M.R. Scandinavian Journal of forest science , 2004 , 19, 65-71. [10 ] Hashemi S.A. American J. Environmental Sci , 2009 , 6, 20-25. [11 ] Heidari M; Attar Roshan S; Hatami Kh. Iranian Journal of Renewable Resource , 2010 , 1(2), 28-42. [12] Jazirehi MH, Ebrahimi M. Silviculture in Zagros, University of Tehran Press, Tehran,. 2003 , 560 (in Persian). [13] Mirdavoodi HR, Zahedi Pour H. Pajuhesh & Sazandegi j,. 2006 , 68, 56-65. [14 ] Mirzaei J; Akbarinia M; Hosseni S.M; Kohzadi M. Environmental Sciences Journals , 2008 , 5(3), 85-94. [15] Neufeldt V, Guralink DB. New World dictionary, Third College Edition, Simon and Schuster. New York in, Barnes BV, Zak DR, Denton SR, Spurr SH. Forest Ecology (4th edition), 1988 , 774. [16 ] Parma R; Shataee Jouybari S. Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research , 2010 , 18 (4), 539-555. [17 ] Peet RK. The measurement of species diversity. Ann. Rev. Ecol, Systematics 5, 1974 , 285-307. [18 ] Pourbabaei H; Heydari M; Najafifar A. Ecol Environ Conserv , 2010 , 16 (4), 1-7. [19 ] Pourbabaei H; Navgran S. Biocenose Journal , 2011 , 3 (1), 15-22. [20 ] Saiful I. Floristic Diversity, Composition and Richness in Relation to Topography of a Hill Forest in Malaysia, 3rd IASME/WSEAS Int, Conf. on Energy & Environment, University of Cambridge, UK, February, 2008 ,23-25. [21 ] Sternberg M; Shoshany M. Ecological Research , 2001 , 16. 335-345p. [22 ] Theurillat J.P; Schlusse A; Wigct L; Guisan A. ESF Alpnet News , 1999 , 1, 19-20.

324

Scholars Research Library