DOCSLIB.ORG

NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-106. a Mass

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-106 A Mass-balance Model for Evaluating Food Web Structure and Community-scale Indicators in the Central Basin of Puget Sound May 2010 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC Series The Northwest Fisheries Science Center of the National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, uses the NOAA Techni- cal Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC series to issue scientific and technical publications. Manuscripts have been peer reviewed and edited. Documents published in this series may be cited in the scientific and technical literature. The NMFS-NWFSC Technical Memorandum series of the Northwest Fisheries Science Center continues the NMFS- F/NWC series established in 1970 by the Northwest & Alaska Fisheries Science Center, which has since been split into the Northwest Fisheries Science Center and the Alaska Fisheries Science Center. The NMFS-AFSC Techni- cal Memorandum series is now being used by the Alaska Fisheries Science Center. Reference throughout this document to trade names does not imply endorsement by the National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA. This document should be referenced as follows: Harvey, C.J., K.K. Bartz, J. Davies, T.B. Francis, T.P. Good, A.D. Guerry, B. Hanson, K.K. Holsman, J. Miller, M.L. Plummer, J.C.P. Reum, L.D. Rhodes, C.A. Rice, J.F. Samhouri, G.D. Williams, N. Yoder, P.S. Levin, and M.H. Ruckelshaus. 2010. A mass-balance model for evaluating food web structure and community-scale indicators in the central basin of Puget Sound. U.S. Dept. Commer., NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-NWFSC-106, 180 p. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NWFSC-106 A Mass-balance Model for Evaluating Food Web Structure and Community-scale Indicators in the Central Basin of Puget Sound Chris J. Harvey, Krista K. Bartz, Jeremy Davies, Tessa B. Francis, Thomas P. Good, Anne D. Guerry, Brad Hanson, Kirstin K. Holsman, Jason Miller, Mark L. Plummer, Jonathan C.P. Reum,* Linda D. Rhodes, Casimir A. Rice, Jameal F. Samhouri, Gregory D. Williams, Naomi Yoder, Phillip S. Levin, and Mary H. Ruckelshaus Northwest Fisheries Science Center 2725 Montlake Boulevard East Seattle, Washington 98112 * University of Washington School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences Box 355020 Seattle, Washington 98195 May 2010 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Most NOAA Technical Memorandums NMFS-NWFSC are available online at the Northwest Fisheries Science Center web site (http://www.nwfsc.noaa.gov) Copies are also available from: National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Road Springfield, VA 22161 phone orders (1-800-553-6847) e-mail orders ([email protected]) ii Table of Contents List of Figures...............................................................................................................................................v List of Tables ..............................................................................................................................................vii Executive Summary.....................................................................................................................................ix Acknowledgments........................................................................................................................................xi Abbreviations and Acronyms ....................................................................................................................xiii Introduction and Objectives..........................................................................................................................1 Methods ........................................................................................................................................................4 Model Domain: The Puget Sound Central Basin .....................................................................................4 Ecopath with Ecosim................................................................................................................................5 Functional Groups ....................................................................................................................................7 Data Assimilation and Parameter Development.......................................................................................7 Model Balancing ....................................................................................................................................10 Model Assessment..................................................................................................................................11 Results.........................................................................................................................................................15 General Characteristics and Mass Balancing of the Ecopath Model......................................................15 Biomass, Functional Diversity, and Evenness Patterns..........................................................................25 Throughput and Transfer Efficiency ......................................................................................................25 Mortality.................................................................................................................................................27 Dynamic Model Responses ....................................................................................................................33 Discussion...................................................................................................................................................44 Objectives 1 and 2: Model Development and Assessment.....................................................................44 Objective 3: Identifying Data Gaps........................................................................................................46 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................................49 References...................................................................................................................................................51 Appendix A: Species and Functional Group Descriptions .........................................................................79 Primary Producers ..................................................................................................................................79 Zooplankton and Pelagic Invertebrates ..................................................................................................85 Benthic Invertebrates..............................................................................................................................93 Pelagic Fishes .......................................................................................................................................113 iii Salmon..................................................................................................................................................118 Gadiforms.............................................................................................................................................130 Other Demersal Roundfish ...................................................................................................................135 Flatfish..................................................................................................................................................142 Chondrichthyans...................................................................................................................................145 Seabirds ................................................................................................................................................149 Marine Mammals..................................................................................................................................159 Bacterial and Detrital Pools..................................................................................................................162 Appendix B: Omitted Groups ...................................................................................................................165 Primary Producers ................................................................................................................................165 Invertebrates .........................................................................................................................................165 Fishes....................................................................................................................................................167 Seabirds ................................................................................................................................................168 Marine Mammals..................................................................................................................................169 Appendix C: Frequently Used Estimation Methods .................................................................................171 Biomass Estimation for Bottom Fish....................................................................................................171 Biomass Estimation for Seabirds..........................................................................................................172
Recommended publications
  • Interview with Actor Jeremy Davies in the New York Times Describing How He Lost 33 Lbs

    Interview with Actor Jeremy Davies in the New York Times Describing How He Lost 33 Lbs

    Interview with actor Jeremy Davies in the New York Times describing how he lost 33 lbs. for the movie "Rescue Dawn" using an infrared sauna. After a number of small-ish roles in decent films (Secretary, Saving Private Ryan), Rescue Dawn's Jeremy Davies decided to study film directing — and ended up getting a number of plum acting roles in the process. Vulture caught up with the diminutive talent, whose ribs are on alarming display in the film, at a dinner at Osteria del Circo following the movie’s premiere. He stood around, flirted with Paz de la Huerta, drank water, and didn't eat a thing. Well, you look a hell of a lot better than you did in the movie. I lost 33 pounds from this weight, which is pretty skinny. I weigh, like, 137-ish now. This is normal, believe it or not. I’ve always been pathologically skinny. Did you get sick from losing all that weight? It was easy to do, and I know how to do it in a healthy way. The secret is using a far infrared sauna, which is at the same frequency as your body heat. It sounds wildly scientific, but basically it gets you heated much more quickly and gets you sweating faster. That doesn't sound easy. How’d you meet Werner? I sought Werner out, and I did the same with Lars von Trier. I wrote Lars a letter and said, “I think you’re one of the greatest filmmakers in the world, and I’d love the privilege of coming to watch you.” And he invited me out and made me take a small role in his film Dogville, which I didn’t even want.
  • The Top 101 Inspirational Movies –

    The Top 101 Inspirational Movies –

    The Top 101 Inspirational Movies – http://www.SelfGrowth.com The Top 101 Inspirational Movies Ever Made – by David Riklan Published by Self Improvement Online, Inc. http://www.SelfGrowth.com 20 Arie Drive, Marlboro, NJ 07746 ©Copyright by David Riklan Manufactured in the United States No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without the prior written permission of the Publisher. Limit of Liability / Disclaimer of Warranty: While the authors have used their best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to the accuracy or completeness of the contents and specifically disclaim any implied warranties. The advice and strategies contained herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a professional where appropriate. The author shall not be liable for any loss of profit or any other commercial damages, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or other damages. The Top 101 Inspirational Movies – http://www.SelfGrowth.com The Top 101 Inspirational Movies Ever Made – by David Riklan TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 6 Spiritual Cinema 8 About SelfGrowth.com 10 Newer Inspirational Movies 11 Ranking Movie Title # 1 It’s a Wonderful Life 13 # 2 Forrest Gump 16 # 3 Field of Dreams 19 # 4 Rudy 22 # 5 Rocky 24 # 6 Chariots of
  • Marine Invertebrate Field Guide

    Marine Invertebrate Field Guide

    Marine Invertebrate Field Guide Contents ANEMONES ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 AGGREGATING ANEMONE (ANTHOPLEURA ELEGANTISSIMA) ............................................................................................................................... 2 BROODING ANEMONE (EPIACTIS PROLIFERA) ................................................................................................................................................... 2 CHRISTMAS ANEMONE (URTICINA CRASSICORNIS) ............................................................................................................................................ 3 PLUMOSE ANEMONE (METRIDIUM SENILE) ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 BARNACLES ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 ACORN BARNACLE (BALANUS GLANDULA) ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 HAYSTACK BARNACLE (SEMIBALANUS CARIOSUS) .............................................................................................................................................. 4 CHITONS ...........................................................................................................................................................................................
  • (Rhizophoraceae) En Isla Larga, Bahía De Mochima, Venezuela Revista De Biología Tropical, Vol

    (Rhizophoraceae) En Isla Larga, Bahía De Mochima, Venezuela Revista De Biología Tropical, Vol

    Revista de Biología Tropical ISSN: 0034-7744 [email protected] Universidad de Costa Rica Costa Rica Acosta Balbas, Vanessa; Betancourt Tineo, Rafael; Prieto Arcas, Antulio Estructura comunitaria de bivalvos y gasterópodos en raíces del mangle rojo Rhizophora mangle (Rhizophoraceae) en isla Larga, bahía de Mochima, Venezuela Revista de Biología Tropical, vol. 62, núm. 2, junio-, 2014, pp. 551-565 Universidad de Costa Rica San Pedro de Montes de Oca, Costa Rica Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=44931383012 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto Estructura comunitaria de bivalvos y gasterópodos en raíces del mangle rojo Rhizophora mangle (Rhizophoraceae) en isla Larga, bahía de Mochima, Venezuela Vanessa Acosta Balbas, Rafael Betancourt Tineo & Antulio Prieto Arcas Departamento de Biología, Escuela de Ciencias, Universidad de Oriente. Aptdo. 245; Cumaná, 6101. Estado Sucre, Venezuela; [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Recibido 18-IX-2012. Corregido 10-III-2013. Aceptado 05-IV-2013. Abstract: Community structure of bivalves and gastropods in roots of red mangrove Rhizophora mangle (Rhizophoraceae) in isla Larga, Mochima Bay, Venezuela. The Rhizophora mangle roots form a complex ecosystem where a wide range of organisms are permanently established, reproduce, and find refuge. In this study, we assessed the diversity of bivalves and gastropods that inhabit red mangrove roots, in isla Larga, Mochima, Venezuela Sucre state.
  • Trophic Ecology of Gelatinous Zooplankton in Oceanic Food Webs of the Eastern Tropical Atlantic Assessed by Stable Isotope Analysis

    Trophic Ecology of Gelatinous Zooplankton in Oceanic Food Webs of the Eastern Tropical Atlantic Assessed by Stable Isotope Analysis

    Limnol. Oceanogr. 9999, 2020, 1–17 © 2020 The Authors. Limnology and Oceanography published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Association for the Sciences of Limnology and Oceanography. doi: 10.1002/lno.11605 Tackling the jelly web: Trophic ecology of gelatinous zooplankton in oceanic food webs of the eastern tropical Atlantic assessed by stable isotope analysis Xupeng Chi ,1,2* Jan Dierking,2 Henk-Jan Hoving,2 Florian Lüskow,3,4 Anneke Denda,5 Bernd Christiansen,5 Ulrich Sommer,2 Thomas Hansen,2 Jamileh Javidpour2,6 1CAS Key Laboratory of Marine Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao, China 2Marine Ecology, GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Kiel, Germany 3Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 4Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 5Institute of Marine Ecosystem and Fishery Science (IMF), Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany 6Department of Biology, University of Southern Denmark, Odense M, Denmark Abstract Gelatinous zooplankton can be present in high biomass and taxonomic diversity in planktonic oceanic food webs, yet the trophic structuring and importance of this “jelly web” remain incompletely understood. To address this knowledge gap, we provide a holistic trophic characterization of a jelly web in the eastern tropical Atlantic, based on δ13C and δ15N stable isotope analysis of a unique gelatinous zooplankton sample set. The jelly web covered most of the isotopic niche space of the entire planktonic oceanic food web, spanning > 3 tro- phic levels, ranging from herbivores (e.g., pyrosomes) to higher predators (e.g., ctenophores), highlighting the diverse functional roles and broad possible food web relevance of gelatinous zooplankton.
  • The Mediterranean Decapod and Stomatopod Crustacea in A

    The Mediterranean Decapod and Stomatopod Crustacea in A

    ANNALES DU MUSEUM D'HISTOIRE NATURELLE DE NICE Tome V, 1977, pp. 37-88. THE MEDITERRANEAN DECAPOD AND STOMATOPOD CRUSTACEA IN A. RISSO'S PUBLISHED WORKS AND MANUSCRIPTS by L. B. HOLTHUIS Rijksmuseum van Natuurlijke Historie, Leiden, Netherlands CONTENTS Risso's 1841 and 1844 guides, which contain a simple unannotated list of Crustacea found near Nice. 1. Introduction 37 Most of Risso's descriptions are quite satisfactory 2. The importance and quality of Risso's carcino- and several species were figured by him. This caused logical work 38 that most of his names were immediately accepted by 3. List of Decapod and Stomatopod species in Risso's his contemporaries and a great number of them is dealt publications and manuscripts 40 with in handbooks like H. Milne Edwards (1834-1840) Penaeidea 40 "Histoire naturelle des Crustaces", and Heller's (1863) Stenopodidea 46 "Die Crustaceen des siidlichen Europa". This made that Caridea 46 Risso's names at present are widely accepted, and that Macrura Reptantia 55 his works are fundamental for a study of Mediterranean Anomura 58 Brachyura 62 Decapods. Stomatopoda 76 Although most of Risso's descriptions are readily 4. New genera proposed by Risso (published and recognizable, there is a number that have caused later unpublished) 76 authors much difficulty. In these cases the descriptions 5. List of Risso's manuscripts dealing with Decapod were not sufficiently complete or partly erroneous, and Stomatopod Crustacea 77 the names given by Risso were either interpreted in 6. Literature 7S different ways and so caused confusion, or were entirely ignored. It is a very fortunate circumstance that many of 1.
  • 2020 Monitoring of Eelgrass Resources in Newport Bay Newport Beach, California

    2020 Monitoring of Eelgrass Resources in Newport Bay Newport Beach, California

    MARINE TAXONOMIC SERVICES, LTD 2020 Monitoring of Eelgrass Resources in Newport Bay Newport Beach, California December 25, 2020 Prepared For: City of Newport Beach Public Works Department 100 Civic Center Drive, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Contact: Chris Miller, Public Works Manager [email protected], (949) 644-3043 Newport Harbor Shallow-Water and Deep-Water Eelgrass Survey Prepared By: MARINE TAXONOMIC SERVICES, LLC COASTAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, INC 920 RANCHEROS DRIVE, STE F-1 23 Morning Wood Drive SAN MARCOS, CA 92069 Laguna Niguel, CA 92677 2020 NEWPORT BAY EELGRASS RESOURCES REPORT Contents Contents ........................................................................................................................................................................ ii Appendices .................................................................................................................................................................. iii Abbreviations ...............................................................................................................................................................iv Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Purpose .......................................................................................................................................................... 1 Background ...............................................................................................................................................................
  • Systematics, Phylogeny, and Taphonomy of Ghost Shrimps (Decapoda): a Perspective from the Fossil Record

    Systematics, Phylogeny, and Taphonomy of Ghost Shrimps (Decapoda): a Perspective from the Fossil Record

    73 (3): 401 – 437 23.12.2015 © Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, 2015. Systematics, phylogeny, and taphonomy of ghost shrimps (Decapoda): a perspective from the fossil record Matúš Hyžný *, 1, 2 & Adiël A. Klompmaker 3 1 Geological-Paleontological Department, Natural History Museum Vienna, Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria; Matúš Hyžný [hyzny.matus@ gmail.com] — 2 Department of Geology and Paleontology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Mlynská dolina, Ilkovičova 6, SVK-842 15 Bratislava, Slovakia — 3 Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, 1659 Museum Road, PO Box 117800, Gaines- ville, FL 32611, USA; Adiël A. Klompmaker [[email protected]] — * Correspond ing author Accepted 06.viii.2015. Published online at www.senckenberg.de/arthropod-systematics on 14.xii.2015. Editor in charge: Stefan Richter. Abstract Ghost shrimps of Callianassidae and Ctenochelidae are soft-bodied, usually heterochelous decapods representing major bioturbators of muddy and sandy (sub)marine substrates. Ghost shrimps have a robust fossil record spanning from the Early Cretaceous (~ 133 Ma) to the Holocene and their remains are present in most assemblages of Cenozoic decapod crustaceans. Their taxonomic interpretation is in flux, mainly because the generic assignment is hindered by their insufficient preservation and disagreement in the biological classification. Fur- thermore, numerous taxa are incorrectly classified within the catch-all taxonCallianassa . To show the historical patterns in describing fos- sil ghost shrimps and to evaluate taphonomic aspects influencing the attribution of ghost shrimp remains to higher level taxa, a database of all fossil species treated at some time as belonging to the group has been compiled: 250 / 274 species are considered valid ghost shrimp taxa herein.
  • High Abundance of Salps in the Coastal Gulf of Alaska During 2011

    High Abundance of Salps in the Coastal Gulf of Alaska During 2011

    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301733881 High abundance of salps in the coastal Gulf of Alaska during 2011: A first record of bloom occurrence for the northern Gulf Article in Deep Sea Research Part II Topical Studies in Oceanography · April 2016 DOI: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2016.04.009 CITATION READS 1 33 4 authors, including: Ayla J. Doubleday Moira Galbraith University of Alaska System Institute of Ocean Sciences, Sidney, BC, Cana… 3 PUBLICATIONS 16 CITATIONS 28 PUBLICATIONS 670 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: l. salmonis and c. clemensi attachment sites: chum salmon View project All content following this page was uploaded by Moira Galbraith on 10 June 2016. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately. Deep-Sea Research II ∎ (∎∎∎∎) ∎∎∎–∎∎∎ Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Deep-Sea Research II journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/dsr2 High abundance of salps in the coastal Gulf of Alaska during 2011: A first record of bloom occurrence for the northern Gulf Kaizhi Li a, Ayla J. Doubleday b, Moira D. Galbraith c, Russell R. Hopcroft b,n a Key Laboratory of Tropical Marine Bio-resources and Ecology, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510301, China b Institute of Marine Science, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, AK 99775-7220, USA c Institute of Ocean Sciences, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, P.O.
  • XIV. Appendices

    XIV. Appendices

    Appendix 1, Page 1 XIV. Appendices Appendix 1. Vertebrate Species of Alaska1 * Threatened/Endangered Fishes Scientific Name Common Name Eptatretus deani black hagfish Lampetra tridentata Pacific lamprey Lampetra camtschatica Arctic lamprey Lampetra alaskense Alaskan brook lamprey Lampetra ayresii river lamprey Lampetra richardsoni western brook lamprey Hydrolagus colliei spotted ratfish Prionace glauca blue shark Apristurus brunneus brown cat shark Lamna ditropis salmon shark Carcharodon carcharias white shark Cetorhinus maximus basking shark Hexanchus griseus bluntnose sixgill shark Somniosus pacificus Pacific sleeper shark Squalus acanthias spiny dogfish Raja binoculata big skate Raja rhina longnose skate Bathyraja parmifera Alaska skate Bathyraja aleutica Aleutian skate Bathyraja interrupta sandpaper skate Bathyraja lindbergi Commander skate Bathyraja abyssicola deepsea skate Bathyraja maculata whiteblotched skate Bathyraja minispinosa whitebrow skate Bathyraja trachura roughtail skate Bathyraja taranetzi mud skate Bathyraja violacea Okhotsk skate Acipenser medirostris green sturgeon Acipenser transmontanus white sturgeon Polyacanthonotus challengeri longnose tapirfish Synaphobranchus affinis slope cutthroat eel Histiobranchus bathybius deepwater cutthroat eel Avocettina infans blackline snipe eel Nemichthys scolopaceus slender snipe eel Alosa sapidissima American shad Clupea pallasii Pacific herring 1 This appendix lists the vertebrate species of Alaska, but it does not include subspecies, even though some of those are featured in the CWCS.
  • Appendix 1. Bodega Marine Lab Student Reports on Polychaete Biology

    Appendix 1. Bodega Marine Lab Student Reports on Polychaete Biology

    Appendix 1. Bodega Marine Lab student reports on polychaete biology. Species names in reports were assigned to currently accepted names. Thus, Ackerman (1976) reported Eupolymnia crescentis, which was recorded as Eupolymnia heterobranchia in spreadsheets of current species (spreadsheets 2-5). Ackerman, Peter. 1976. The influence of substrate upon the importance of tentacular regeneration in the terebellid polychaete EUPOLYMNIA CRESCENTIS with reference to another terebellid polychaete NEOAMPHITRITE ROBUSTA in regard to its respiratory response. Student Report, Bodega Marine Lab, Library. IDS 100 ∗ Eupolymnia heterobranchia (Johnson, 1901) reported as Eupolymnia crescentis Chamberlin, 1919 changed per Lights 2007. Alex, Dan. 1972. A settling survey of Mason's Marina. Student Report, Bodega Marine Lab, Library. Zoology 157 Alexander, David. 1976. Effects of temperature and other factors on the distribution of LUMBRINERIS ZONATA in the substratum (Annelida: polychaeta). Student Report, Bodega Marine Lab, Library. IDS 100 Amrein, Yost. 1949. The holdfast fauna of MACROSYSTIS INTEGRIFOLIA. Student Report, Bodega Marine Lab, Library. Zoology 112 ∗ Platynereis bicanaliculata (Baird, 1863) reported as Platynereis agassizi Okuda & Yamada, 1954. Changed per Lights 1954 (2nd edition). ∗ Naineris dendritica (Kinberg, 1867) reported as Nanereis laevigata (Grube, 1855) (should be: Naineris laevigata). N. laevigata not in Hartman 1969 or Lights 2007. N. dendritica taken as synonymous with N. laevigata. ∗ Hydroides uncinatus Fauvel, 1927 correct per I.T.I.S. although Hartman 1969 reports Hydroides changing to Eupomatus. Lights 2007 has changed Eupomatus to Hydroides. ∗ Dorvillea moniloceras (Moore, 1909) reported as Stauronereis moniloceras (Moore, 1909). (Stauronereis to Dorvillea per Hartman 1968). ∗ Amrein reported Stylarioides flabellata, which was not recognized by Hartman 1969, Lights 2007 or the Integrated Taxonomic Information System (I.T.I.S.).
  • Fish Bulletin 161. California Marine Fish Landings for 1972 and Designated Common Names of Certain Marine Organisms of California

    Fish Bulletin 161. California Marine Fish Landings for 1972 and Designated Common Names of Certain Marine Organisms of California

    UC San Diego Fish Bulletin Title Fish Bulletin 161. California Marine Fish Landings For 1972 and Designated Common Names of Certain Marine Organisms of California Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/93g734v0 Authors Pinkas, Leo Gates, Doyle E Frey, Herbert W Publication Date 1974 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE RESOURCES AGENCY OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME FISH BULLETIN 161 California Marine Fish Landings For 1972 and Designated Common Names of Certain Marine Organisms of California By Leo Pinkas Marine Resources Region and By Doyle E. Gates and Herbert W. Frey > Marine Resources Region 1974 1 Figure 1. Geographical areas used to summarize California Fisheries statistics. 2 3 1. CALIFORNIA MARINE FISH LANDINGS FOR 1972 LEO PINKAS Marine Resources Region 1.1. INTRODUCTION The protection, propagation, and wise utilization of California's living marine resources (established as common property by statute, Section 1600, Fish and Game Code) is dependent upon the welding of biological, environment- al, economic, and sociological factors. Fundamental to each of these factors, as well as the entire management pro- cess, are harvest records. The California Department of Fish and Game began gathering commercial fisheries land- ing data in 1916. Commercial fish catches were first published in 1929 for the years 1926 and 1927. This report, the 32nd in the landing series, is for the calendar year 1972. It summarizes commercial fishing activities in marine as well as fresh waters and includes the catches of the sportfishing partyboat fleet. Preliminary landing data are published annually in the circular series which also enumerates certain fishery products produced from the catch.