DOCSLIB.ORG

Early Detection and Monitoring for New Aquatic Invasive Species in Lake Michigan: 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Early Detection and Monitoring for New Aquatic Invasive Species in Lake Michigan: 2016 Early Detection and Monitoring for New Aquatic Invasive Species in Lake Michigan: 2016 Report Number: 2017-008 1 Harris, B.S., J. T. Richter, M. Shaffer, B.J. Smith and C-A. Hayer. 2016. Early detection and monitoring for new aquatic invasive species in Lake Michigan. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Green Bay Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office, Green Bay, WI. Report Number 2017-008. i Table of Contents List of Figures ......................................................................................................................v List of Tables .................................................................................................................... vii Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... viii Introduction ..........................................................................................................................1 Objectives ............................................................................................................................4 Methods................................................................................................................................4 Study area........................................................................................................................4 Sampling gears ................................................................................................................5 Fish community sampling ...............................................................................................5 Benthic macroinvertebrate sampling ..............................................................................6 Ichthyoplankton sampling ...............................................................................................7 Analysis and Interpretation .............................................................................................8 Results ..................................................................................................................................9 Environmental DNA .......................................................................................................9 Fish community sampling ...............................................................................................9 Benthic macroinvertebrate sampling ............................................................................10 Ichthyoplankton sampling .............................................................................................11 Discussion ..........................................................................................................................11 Conclusions ........................................................................................................................14 Future Work .......................................................................................................................14 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................14 References ..........................................................................................................................15 Figures................................................................................................................................21 Tables .................................................................................................................................36 vii List of Figures Figure 1. Lake Michigan study areas (hotspots) sampled by the Aquatic Invasive Species (AIS) program during 2016. All hotspot study sites are outlined in red while study rivers for eDNA sampling are drawn in black and labeled. Figure 2. Study area of rivers flowing into Lake Michigan for eDNA analysis. Figure 3. Lower Green Bay, WI traditional gear study area with sample locations for each gear type. Sampling was performed during May-October 2016. Five additional electrofishing runs were performed upstream in the Fox River near the De Pere Dam but are not depicted. Figure 4. Map of the Milwaukee, WI traditional gear study area with sample locations for each gear type. Sampling was performed during September 2016. Figure 5. Map of the Chicago, IL traditional gear study area with sample locations for each gear type. Sampling was performed during August 2016. Figure 6. Map of the Calumet Harbor, IL traditional gear study area with sample locations for each gear type. Sampling was performed during August 2016. Figure 7. Map of the Burns Harbor, IN traditional gear study area with sample locations for each gear type. Sampling was performed during August 2016. Figure 8. Map of light trap sampling locations in the Milwaukee River and Milwaukee Harbor, WI during 2016 ichthyoplankton surveys. Figure 9. Map of light trap sampling locations in the Lower Fox River, Green Bay, WI during 2016 ichthyoplankton surveys. Figure 10. Length-frequency histograms for nine species collected across all gear types and sites during 2016 Lake Michigan sampling. Note that the X and Y axes differ in scale across species. Figure 11. Dendrogram of fish communities at hotspot sampling sites calculated using average- linkage hierarchical cluster analysis in 2016. Figure 12. Sample size based rarefaction (solid lines) and extrapolation (dashed lines, up to double the reference sample size) of species richness for all gears used in 2016 with the five hotspots combined. The reference samples are denoted by the solid dots. The 95% confidence intervals (shaded regions) were obtained using a bootstrap method based on 200 replications. The rarefaction/extrapolation curves along with the asymptotic species richness for each gear were calculated by the Chao et al. 2014 estimator functions within the iNEXT package using the software program R. viii Figure 13. Sample size based rarefaction (solid lines) and extrapolation (dashed lines) of species richness for all traditional gears used in 2016 at the five hotspot locations. The reference samples are denoted by the solid dots. The 95% confidence intervals (shaded regions) were obtained using a bootstrap method based on 200 replications. The rarefaction/extrapolation curves along with the asymptotic species richness for each location were calculated using the Chao et al. 2014 estimator functions within the iNEXT package run in the software program R. Within the figure; y-axis levels vary, n = units of effort, S = # of species caught, and E = Sampling efficiency. ix List of Tables Table 1. River name, state, number of reaches, number of water samples taken, and dates sampled for environmental DNA analysis in nine hotspot rivers for Bighead and Silver Carp presence during 2016. Table 2. Total catch from all gears combined at five hotspot sampling locations in Lake Michigan during 2016 including catches from an early season (May) paired fyke net gear comparison in Green Bay. Names of invasive species are bolded. Table 3. Gear and units of effort allocations expended during 2016 at the five hotspot locations in Lake Michigan using three traditional fish sampling gears. Table 4. Environmental conditions and sampling site characteristics at light trap locations in the Milwaukee River and Milwaukee Harbor during 2016 ichthyoplankton surveys. Table 5. Environmental conditions and sampling site characteristics at light trap locations in the Lower Fox River – Green Bay during 2016 ichthyoplankton surveys. x Executive Summary For nearly two centuries, continual introductions of non-native species in the Laurentian Great Lakes have altered the ecosystem and cost millions of dollars in damage to fisheries and infrastructure. In recent decades, there has been increasing emphasis on prevention and early detection of new invasive species in the Laurentian Great Lakes. The aquatic invasive species (AIS) program at the Green Bay Fish and Wildlife Conservation Office performed early detection and monitoring throughout Lake Michigan in 2016. Water samples were collected to detect the presence of Bighead and Silver Carp DNA from the Fox and Milwaukee rivers in Wisconsin and the St. Joseph, Kalamazoo, Macatawa, Galien, Black, Grand and Muskegon rivers in Michigan. Fish and macroinvertebrates communities were sampled from the bay of Green Bay, Calumet Harbor, Burns Harbor, and nearshore waters of near Milwaukee and Chicago, five locations identified as hotspots for invasion of new invasive species. Sampling focused on detection of bigheaded carps (i.e., Bighead and Silver Carp) in rivers, monitoring fish and macroinvertebrate communities in five hotspot locations associated with densely populated port cities on Lake Michigan, and developing a monitoring protocol for ichthyoplankton. We found no evidence of Bighead or Silver Carp presence using environmental DNA sampling techniques on nine river systems in Michigan and Wisconsin. No new invasive or non-native species were detected in 2016 at the five hotspot locations in Lake Michigan. A total of 51,864 individual fish representing 73 species were collected with 411 units of sampling effort. Species accumulation curves indicated that fish communities were effectively sampled using nighttime boat electrofishing, experimental gill nets, and paired modified fyke nets that when combined, provided a representative sample of the fish community at each location (90-95% of species collected). Gears and methods for sampling fish were improved during 2016, allowing for reduced effort with similar, or better, efficiency
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Factors Affecting the Distribution and Abundance of an Invasive Freshwater Mysid
    Factors affecting the distribution and abundance of an invasive freshwater mysid Suncica Avlijas Biology Department McGill University, Montreal December 2012 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Science in Biology © Suncica Avlijas 2012 Abstract The freshwater shrimp Hemimysis anomala is a recent Ponto-Caspian invader of the Great Lakes – St. Lawrence River basin. Based on its invasion history, high predation rate and the naiveté of the ecosystems in which it has been introduced, it has the potential to exert strong impacts on native food webs. Risk assessment and effective monitoring of the spread of this invader require information about the environmental factors that limit its local abundance and distribution. A literature review suggests that H. anomala has broad environmental tolerances but may be limited by low water conductivity levels, high local flow, and low dissolved oxygen. An empirical model derived from results of a field study in the St. Lawrence River identified specific conductivity and shoreline heterogeneity as important predictors of H. anomala occurrence and abundance across sites. The relationship between conductivity and H. anomala occurrence is further supported by experimental evidence that demonstrates lower functional responses at lower conductivity levels. Distance from shore and depth were also good predictors of H. anomala abundance, which was maximal in areas close to shore and at depths above 2 m. i Résumé La crevette d’eau douce Hemimysis anomala est une espèce envahissante provenant de la région Ponto-Caspienne qui a été découverte récemment dans le bassin des Grands Lacs et du fleuve Saint-Laurent.
    [Show full text]
  • Bloody Red Shrimp Hemimysis Anomala
    Bloody Red Shrimp www.paseagrant.org Hemimysis anomala The bloody red shrimp is a tiny freshwater crustacean in the order Mysidacea; more commonly referred to as mysids. Mysids are also sometimes called opossum shrimp because females typically carry their eggs in a pouch. While the effect this shrimp will have on the Great Lakes is unknown, based on its history of invasion across Europe, significant impacts are possible. Drawing courtesy of Patty Wellington. Species Description TOP VIEW These shrimp are very small, with males reaching only 8-10 mm and females reaching 11-16 mm. They have large stalked eyes and eight pairs of legs. They are typically red to orange in color due to pigmented cells called chromatophores; however, coloration can be highly variable and change with varying light and temperature conditions. Some individuals lack color completely and are ivory or translucent. Without a microscope, the best way to distinguish the bloody red shrimp from other shrimp is by counting legs — it has eight pairs of legs, while most other larger shrimps and decapods have five pairs. In addition its unique swarming behavior is unlikely to be confused with anything else in the Great Lakes. With magnification, the bloody red shrimp has a distinctive flat-ended SIDE VIEW tail with two prominent spikes. BLOODY RED SHRIMP Native & Introduced Ranges Hemimysis anomala Native to the Ponto-Caspian region of Eastern Europe, the bloody red shrimp was first reported in the United States in 2006 in Muskegon Lake, which is connected to Lake Michigan. Since then, the monitoring network that was established to track its distribution throughout the Great Lakes has found populations in lakes Michigan, Ontario, and Erie.
    [Show full text]
  • Workshop Manual: Aquatic Invasive Species
    AIS Workshop Workshop Manual: Aquatic Invasive Species An Introduction to Identification, Collection and Reporting of Aquatic Invasive Species in Ontario Waters AIS Workshop Copyright 2008 © MNR and OFAH Cover Photographs (left to right): Top row – Peter W. Bergstrom, Wasyl Bakowsky, Donald Sutherland Middle Row – Dale Westaby, Dave Britton, Steven Pothoven Bottom Row – John Lyons, Michael Butler, David Rieks 1 AIS Workshop Contents LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................... 47 LIST OF TABLES ....................................................................................... 47 0 ABOUT THIS WORKSHOP.......................................................................... 57 A0 BOUT THIS WORKSHOP.......................................................................... 58 Learning5 Outcomes............................................................................. 68 O1 VERVIEW ............................................................................................... 78 Introduction to Aquatic Invasive Species ........................................... 78 Historical6 Perspective in Brief............................................................ 98 Pathways ............................................................................................. 98 Response7 to Aquatic Invasive Species.............................................. 128 National Strategy and Action Plan..........................................................128 8 Additional Information ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating the Efficacy of Environmental DNA (Edna)
    Evaluating the efficacy of environmental DNA (eDNA) as an early detection tool for the Mohawk Watershed’s newest aquatic invader, the bloody-red shrimp, Hemimysis anomala. Sonomi Oyagi1, Brent T. Boscarino1, Meghan E. Brown2, Michael Tibbetts3 1Poughkeepsie Day School, 260 Boardman Road, Poughkeepsie, NY 12603 2 Hobart and William Smith Colleges, 300 Pulteney Street, Geneva, NY 14456 3Bard College, 30 Campus Road, Annandale-on-Hudson, NY 12504 Invasion history The bloody-red shrimp Hemimysis anomala (hereafter BRS) is a recent Ponto-Caspian aquatic invasive species that was first reported in 2006 in Lakes Ontario and Michigan (Pothoven et al, 2007; Walsh et al, 2012) and has now become firmly established in the Great Lakes, St. Lawrence River and other inland lakes of New York, including Oneida, Cayuga and Seneca Lakes (Brown et al., 2014). Our research team most recently discovered multiple reproducing populations of BRS in the Erie Canal and Mohawk River as far east as Waterford, NY (Brown et al., 2014; Boscarino, unpubl.), These results strongly indicate that the Erie Canal and Mohawk River are serving as major vectors of spread for this species towards the Hudson River. Importance of early detection in the case of BRS This project seeks to develop an effective early detection method for BRS as they continue their expansion throughout the Hudson-Mohawk River watershed. Early detection is critical for management success and to limit the cost of control measures (Anderson, 2005; Vander Zanden, 2010). Efforts to detect non-native species in the early stages of an invasion are often hindered by inadequate sampling methods that are often cost-ineffective or simply ineffective at low densities.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Operating Procedure for Mysid Analysis
    Standard Operating Procedure for Mysid Analysis LG408 Revision 01, February 2015 Table of Contents Section Number Subject Page 1.0……….SCOPE AND APPLICATION………………………………………………………………. 1 2.0……….SUMMARY OF METHOD…………………………………………………….……………. 1 3.0……….SAMPLE COLLECTION AND PRESERVATION………………………….……………. 1 4.0……….APPARATUS…………………………………………………………………………………. 1 5.0……….REAGENTS……………………………………………………………………..……………. 1 6.0……….ANALYTICAL PROCEDURE – MYSID SAMPLE ANALYSIS…………..…………….. 2 7.0……….CALCULATION OF MYSID BIOMASS…………………………………….…………….. 7 8.0……….CALCULATIONS AND REPORTING…………………………………………………….. 7 9.0……….QUALITY CONTROL AUDITS AND METHODS PRECISION………….…..………… 9 10.0……...SAFETY AND WASTE DISPOSAL………………………………………….…………….. 10 11.0……...REFERENCES……………………………………………………………………………….. 10 FIGURES…………………………………………………………………………………...…………….. 12 APPENDIX 1: FORMS………………………………………………………………………………….. 20 Disclaimer: Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation of use. Standard Operating Procedure for Mysid Analysis 1.0 SCOPE AND APPLICATION 1.1 This standard operating procedure is used to identify, sex, enumerate, and measure the mysid populations from the Great Lakes. 2.0 SUMMARY OF METHOD 2.1 The method involves macroscopic and microscopic examination of mysid samples. The entire sample is examined for mysids by eye in a sorting tray. Up to 100 mysids are photographed for digital measurement. Marsupia of female mysids are examined under a stereoscopic microscope for number and stage of brood. Gravid females may have been separated
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guide to Aquatic Invasive Species
    Field Guide to Aquatic Invasive Species Identification, collection and reporting of aquatic invasive species in Ontario waters Algae Plants Invertebrates Fishes Copyright © 2008, Queen’s Printer for Ontario Printed in Ontario, Canada By: Keiko Lui Michael Butler Martha Allen Jessica da Silva Beth Brownson Cover Photographs (left to right): Top row - Peter W. Bergstrom, Wasyl Bakowsky, Donald Sutherland Middle row - Dale Westaby, Dave Britton, Steven Pothoven Bottom row - John Lyons, Michael Butler, David Riecks MNR # 52089 (lk P.R., 08 02 28) ISBN 978-1-4249-4380-7 (Print) ISBN 978-1-4249-7313-2 (PDF) Field Guide to Aquatic Invasive Species Identification, collection and reporting of aquatic invasive species in Ontario waters Contents Acknowledgements 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Using The Field Guide 1.1.1 Species identification 1.1.2 Collecting specimens, recording information and reporting 1.2 Additional Information 2.0 IDENTIFICATION Algae Plants Invertebrates Fishes 3.0 REPORTING PROCEDURE 3.1 Collecting A Specimen 3.1.1 Algae 3.1.2 Plants 3.1.3 Invertebrates 3.1.4 Fishes 3.2 Recording Information 3.3 Report The Sighting Literature Cited Photo Index to Species Acknowledgements Many people helped this field guide come together and we are grateful to every one. We attempt to acknowledge each person below and regret if we have omitted anyone. Thanks to the following for their help on assessing and prioritizing species for inclusion in the guide: Ken Allison, Eric Snyder, Claire Wilson (Canadian Food Inspection Agency, CFIA); Becky Cudmore, Nick Mandrak (Fisheries and Oceans Canada, DFO); Francine MacDonald, Heather Smith (Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters, OFAH); and April Tranter (Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, OMNR).
    [Show full text]
  • Borza Doktori Értekezés 2012.07.23
    Ponto-kaszpikus magasabbrend ű rákok (Crustacea: Malacostraca: Mysida, Amphipoda, Isopoda) faunisztikai és taxonómiai vizsgálata a Duna vízrendszerében Doktori értekezés Szerz ő: Borza Péter Biológia Doktori Iskola Iskolavezet ő: Dr. Erdei Anna Zootaxonómia, Állatökológia, Hidrobiológia Doktori Program Programvezet ő: Dr. Török János Témavezet ő: Dr. Oertel Nándor nyugalmazott tudományos f őmunkatárs, a biológiai tudomány kandidátusa MTA Ökológiai Kutatóközpont, Duna-kutató Intézet ELTE TTK Állatrendszertani MTA ÖK és Ökológiai Tanszék Duna-kutató Intézet Budapest, 2012 Tartalomjegyzék 1. Bevezetés............................................................................................................................ 4 1.1. A ponto-kaszpikus régió mint inváziós donorterület ................................................. 4 1.2. A ponto-kaszpikus Peracarida fauna.......................................................................... 8 1.2.1. Összetétele, feltárása.......................................................................................... 8 1.2.2. Őshonos elterjedése............................................................................................ 8 1.3. Az állatcsoporthoz kapcsolódó faunisztikai kutatások............................................. 10 1.3.1. Magyarországon............................................................................................... 10 1.3.2. A többi Duna menti országban......................................................................... 11 2. Irodalmi áttekintés...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Hemimysis Anomala
    ATMOSPH ND ER A I C C I A N D A M E I C N O I S L T A R Great Lakes New Invader: N A T O I I O T N A N U E .S C .D R E E PA M RT OM Bloody Red Shrimp (Hemimysis anomala) MENT OF C 183rd Species Invades the Great Lakes! The “bloody-red shrimp” Hemimysis anomala, was first reported by NOAA from samples collected in Muskegon, Michigan in November of 2006 in waters connected to Lake Michigan—in excess of >1500 individuals per square meter (135 per ft2) in swarms. It has also been found in samples taken in Lake Ontario off Oswego, New York. In both locations, adults, juveniles, and pregnant females were found, indicating that this species is reproducing in the Great Lakes. Finding the bloody red shrimp in two separate locations indicates Bloody red shrimp that the species may be wide-spread, and experts expect swarm visible in the that it will be seen in additional locations as scientists shadow of a pier. begin actively looking for it. The impact of this species on the Great Lakes is yet unknown, but based on its Help Needed to Document the Spread of this history of invasion across Europe, significant impacts Species! are possible. The bloody red shrimp prefers habitats associated with hard structures or rocky bottoms and actively avoids direct sunlight. It has a unique swarming behavior unlikely to be confused with anything else in the Great Lakes. During daylight hours, it may be observed forming reddish swarms in the shadows of piers, boats, or breakwalls.
    [Show full text]
  • Hemimysis Anomala)
    ATMOSPH ND ER A I C C I A N D A M E I C N O I S L T A R N A T O I I O T N A N U E .S Bloody Red Shrimp (Hemimysis anomala) . C D R E E PA M RT OM MENT OF C New Invader in the Great Lakes Bloody Red Shrimp (Hemimysis anomala) The “bloody-red shrimp” Hemimysis anomala, was first reported in the Great Lakes by NOAA from samples collected in Muskegon, Michigan in November of 2006 in waters connected to Lake Michigan. It is a small shrimp- like crustacean (order Mysidacea) native to the low-salinity Swarm margins of the Black Sea, the Azov Sea, and the eastern Caspian Sea and most likely was brought into the Great Lakes via ballast tanks. However, mysids are also used by aquarists as a high-nutrition food for aquarium fish, although we have not found any records that Hemimysis is used this way. Bloody red shrimp swarm visible in the Mysids are often called opossum shrimp because females shadow of a pier. typically carry their eggs in a pouch. They are free-swimming distribution, and impact of the bloody red shrimp (Hemimysis when not resting on the bottom or other surfaces. They have anomala) in the Great Lakes. We are asking the public’s help eight pair of legs rather than the five typically found on in documenting other locations around the Great Lakes basin larger shrimps and other decapods. where this species has spread. The main Muskegon population was found in a swarm ANGLERS: You can help us by examining the gut content with over 300 individuals per m3.
    [Show full text]
  • Communications
    Communications Hemimysis anomala OCEANOLOGIA, 47 (3), 2005. G. O. Sars, 1907 pp. 405–408. C 2005, by Institute of (Crustacea, Mysidacea) Oceanology PAS. –firstrecordinthe KEYWORDS Gulf of Gdańsk* Hemimysis anomala Non-indigenous species Southern Baltic Urszula Janas Piotr Wysocki Department of Experimental Ecology of Marine Organisms, Institute of Oceanography, University of Gdańsk, al. Marszałka Piłsudskiego 46, PL–81–378 Gdynia, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] Received 19 May 2005, revised 1 September 2005, accepted 5 September 2005. Abstract The present paper reports on the occurrence of Hemimysis anomala G.O. Sars, 1907 (Crustacea, Mysidacea) in the coastal waters of the Gulf of Gdańsk in the years 2002–2005. Ponto-Caspian species make up a sizeable group among the non-native species in the Baltic Sea (Lepp¨akoski et al. 2002). Some of them were deliberately introduced as fish-food into freshwater basins in the former USSR, from where they were probably able to enter the Baltic. One such species is Hemimysis anomala G. O. Sars, 1907 (Photo 1), which is endemic to the Sea of Azov – Black Sea basin. Adults reach a length of 8.0–10.0 mm in the Black Sea and 6.7–8.5 mm in the Sea of Azov and in fresh waters (Bacescu 1969). * The project was carried out within the framework of the MarBEF Network of Excellence ‘Marine Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning’ which is funded by the European Community’s Sixth Framework Programme (contract No GOCE-CT-2003 -505446). This paper is contribution number MPS-05017 of MarBEF. The complete text of the paper is available at http://www.iopan.gda.pl/oceanologia/ 406 U.
    [Show full text]
  • Science Advice from the Risk Assessment of the Invasive Bloody Red Shrimp (Hemimysis Anomala) in Canada
    Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Central and Arctic Region Science Advisory Report 2009/078 SCIENCE ADVICE FROM THE RISK ASSESSMENT OF THE INVASIVE BLOODY RED SHRIMP (HEMIMYSIS ANOMALA) IN CANADA Photo credit: Kelly Bowen, DFO. Figure 1. Map of Hemimysis anomala occurrence in the Great Lakes region. *Fish Samples are samples taken from the gut contents of fish which have been confirmed as Hemimysis anomala. Source: Marty 2008. Original source: NOAA, Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory web site (2007) (http://www.glerl.noaa.gov/pubs/brochures/). Context The bloody red shrimp (Hemimysis anomala) is a newly discovered potential aquatic invasive species (AIS) in the Great Lakes. It has the potential to negatively impact the ecosystems here, as has occurred in other regions where it is invasive, including Europe. Individuals of this species were first discovered in 2006 in lakes Michigan and Ontario. However, the species may have been present for several years before this. Within the last few years, the presence of H. anomala in Lake Erie has also been confirmed. Fisheries and Oceans Canada’s (DFO) Centre of Expertise for Aquatic Risk Assessment (CEARA) set out to determine the potential risk of Hemimysis anomala on the Great Lakes and inland lakes ecosystems. This followed the guidelines established by CEARA for assessing the biological risk of aquatic invasive species in Canada. This risk assessment examined H. anomala presence using the Quantitative Biological Risk Assessment Tool (QBRAT), which organizes information and facilitates a quantitative or semi-quantitative method of conducting risk assessments. The purpose of the risk assessment and its review at the national advisory meeting was to identify the risks involved in the species’ spread and establishment and to inform a plan of action.
    [Show full text]
  • Hemimysis Anomala) Ecological Risk Screening Summary
    Bloody Red Shrimp (Hemimysis anomala) Ecological Risk Screening Summary U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, February 2011 Revised, January 2018 Web Version, 8/16/2018 Photo: U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Licensed under Creative Commons (CC-BY-NC-SA). Available: http://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=image&pic=40019 (January 2018). 1 1 Native Range and Status in the United States Native Range From Kipp et al. (2018): “Hemimysis anomala is native to freshwater margins of the Black Sea, the Azov Sea and the eastern Ponto-Caspian Sea. It has historically occurred in the lower reaches of the Don, Danube, Dnieper and Dniester rivers.” Status in the United States From Kipp et al. (2018): “The presence of juveniles and reproductive females within a dense population suggests that H. anomala is well established near Muskegon Lake in southern Lake Michigan (Pothoven et al. 2007) and at Nine Mile Point in Lake Ontario (J. Wyda, pers. comm.). A population density of 0.5 ± 0.1 individuals/L recorded at the Lake Michigan site (Pothoven et al. 2007) is already within the range found in some European reservoirs invaded by H. anomala, and is higher than maximum densities recorded for several other mysids (Ketelaars et al. 1999).” “H. anomala was reported for the first time in 2006 from two disjunct regions in the Great Lakes: southeastern Lake Ontario at Nine Mile Point near Oswego, New York, in May 2006 (J. Wyda 2007, personal communication); and from a channel connecting Muskegon Lake to Lake Michigan in November 2006 (Pothoven et al.
    [Show full text]