1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1 Presidential Advisory Committee

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1 Presidential Advisory Committee Presidential Advisory Committee 1 Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health 1 (NIOSH) Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health 2 3 4 VOLUME I 5 6 7 The verbatim transcript of the Meeting of the Advisory Board on Radiation and Worker Health 8 held at the Washington Court Hotel, 525 New Jersey Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C., on May 2 and 3, 9 2002. 10 NANCY LEE & ASSOCIATES Certified Verbatim Reporters P.O. Box 451196 11 Atlanta, Georgia 31145-9196 (404) 315-8305 12 13 C O N T E N T S 2 Vol. I Registration and Welcome Dr. Paul Ziemer, Chair 1 Mr. Larry Elliott, Executive Secretary. .8 Welcome and Opening Remarks Dr. Kathleen Rest, NIOSH . .11 2 Review and Approval of Draft Minutes Dr. Paul Ziemer, Chair. 18 3 Program Status Report Mr. Larry Elliott, Executive Secretary . .36 Changes to Probability of Causation Rule 4 (42 CFR Part 82) Mr. Ted Katz, NIOSH . 70 NCI-IREP 5 Dr. Charles Land, NCI . 82 NIOSH-IREP in use by DOL Dr. Mary Schubauer-Berigan, NIOSH . .115 6 Mr. Russ Henshaw, NIOSH . .176 Topics for Future Discussion Dr. Paul Ziemer, Chair . 193 7 Public Comment . 207 Discussion of Changes in the Rule . .216 8 Adjourn . .223 9 10 11 12 13 C O N T E N T S 3 Vol. II Registration and Welcome Dr. Paul Ziemer, Chair Mr. Larry Elliott, Executive Secretary . 227 1 Administrative Housekeeping Ms. Cori Homer, NIOSH . .227 2 Discussion of Rules. 237 Legislative History Dr. David Michaels, George Washington University. .268 3 Public Comment Period . .327 Adjourn . .344 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 P A R T I C I P A N T S 4 CHAIR ZIEMER, Paul L., Ph.D. Professor Emeritus 1 School of Health Sciences Purdue University Lafayette, Indiana 2 EXECUTIVE SECRETARY ELLIOTT, Larry J. Director, Office of Compensation Analysis and Support National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health 3 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Cincinnati, Ohio 4 MEMBERSHIP ANDERSON, Henry A., M.D. Chief Medical Officer 5 Occupational and Environmental Health Wisconsin Division of Public Health Madison, Wisconsin 6 ANDRADE, Antonio, Ph.D. Group Leader Radiation Protection Services Group Los Alamos National Laboratory 7 Los Alamos, New Mexico DeHART, Roy Lynch, M.D., M.P.H. Director 8 The Vanderbilt Center for Occupational and Environmental Medicine Professor of Medicine Nashville, Tennessee 9 ESPINOSA, Richard Lee Sheet Metal Workers Union Local #49 Johnson Controls 10 Los Alamos National Laboratory Espanola, New Mexico 11 GADOLA, Sally L., M.S., R.N., COHN-S 12 Occupational Health Nurse Specialist Oak Ridge Associated Universities 13 Occupational Health Oak Ridge, Tennessee 5 GRIFFON, Mark A. President Creative Pollution Solutions, Inc. Salem, New Hampshire 1 MELIUS, James Malcom, M.D., Ph.D. Director New York State Laborers' Health and Safety Trust Fund Albany, New York 2 MUNN, Wanda I. Senior Nuclear Engineer (Retired) Richland, Washington 3 PRESLEY, Robert W. Special Projects Engineer BWXT Y12 National Security Complex 4 Clinton, Tennessee ROESSLER, Genevieve S., Ph.D. Professor Emeritus 5 University of Florida Elysian, Minnesota 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 INVITED SPEAKERS 6 Dr. Kathleen Rest, NIOSH Mr. Ted Katz, NIOSH Dr. Charles Land, NCI 1 Dr. Mary Schubauer-Berigan, NIOSH Mr. Russ Henshaw, NIOSH 2 Ms. Cori Homer, NIOSH Dr. David Michaels, George Washington University 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 STAFF/VENDORS 7 CORI HOMER, Committee Management Specialist, NIOSH MARIE MURRAY, Writer/Editor STEVEN RAY GREEN, Certified Court Reporter AUDIENCE PARTICIPANTS 1 Neil Barss William Beckner Jim Blankenship 2 Fred Blosser Jeff Eagan Don Elisburg Joe Fitzgerald 3 Tracey Gilbertson Alice Kelley Jeff Klemm Jeffrey Kotsch 4 Tim McAdams Martin Mathamel Richard Miller Frank Morales 5 Jim Neton Louise Presley Jerome Puskin Randy Rabinowitz 6 Mark Reinhalter Genevieve Roessler Malia Rulon Michael Schaeffer 7 Mary Schubauer-Berigan Josh Silverman Robert Tabor Liz Titus 8 Nancy Zuchernol 9 10 11 12 13 TRANSCRIPT LEGEND 8 The following transcript contains quoted material. Such material is reproduced as read or spoken. In the following transcript a dash (--) indicates an 1 unintentional or purposeful interruption of a sentence. An ellipsis (. .) indicates halting speech or an 2 unfinished sentence in dialogue or omission(s) of word(s) when reading written material. 3 In the following transcript (sic) denotes an incorrect usage or pronunciation of a word which is 4 transcribed in its original form as reported. In the following transcript (phonetically) indicates 5 a phonetic spelling of the word if no confirmation of the correct spelling is available. 6 In the following transcript "uh-huh" represents an affirmative response, and "uh-uh" represents a negative 7 response. 8 9 10 11 12 13 P R O C E E D I N G S 9 (8:15 a.m.) DR. ZIEMER: Good morning, everyone. I'd like to call to order the third or fourth, depending 1 whether you count the teleconference. I guess it's the fourth official meeting of the Advisory Board on 2 Radiation and Worker Health. We're pleased at this meeting to welcome one 3 new member to the Advisory Board. That new member is Mark Griffon. Mark, you can raise your hand over 4 here. I'm sure most or all of the Board members have met Mark, but just let me take a moment and 5 indicate a little bit about Mark's background. Mark has served as president of Creative 6 Pollution Solutions in New Hampshire since 1992 and in that capacity he performs consulting services in 7 the radiation and hazardous waste field. He also presently serves as program director for the 8 Department of Energy's medical surveillance research program for the gaseous diffusion plant exposure 9 assessment, and he also is a member of the advisory board of the U.S. Transuranium and Uranium 10 Registries. Mark did his undergraduate work at Rensselaer Poly Tech and his graduate work, 11 including an M.S. and Ph.D. from the University at Massachusetts at Lowell. And Mark, we welcome you 12 to the committee, look forward to your 13 participation. 10 MR. GRIFFON: Just one correction there -- I don't have the Ph.D. yet. DR. ZIEMER: Well, that's interesting, 1 because President Bush thinks you do. (LAUGHTER) 2 DR. ZIEMER: We'd better keep that secret. No, actually what I just read is from the White 3 House news page, so -- well, even worse than that, they had my name spelled wrong, so... 4 Okay, in any event, we still welcome you, Mark, in spite of your lack of that degree. 5 I'd like to remind everyone here, including the Board members and all visitors, to please 6 register your attendance with us today. There's a registration or sign-in book on the table, so please 7 take care of that if you have not already. Those of the general public who wish to make 8 comments during the public comment period, there is a sign-up page in one of the other books there at 9 the table and we ask you to sign up, simply so we can assess how many will be wanting to speak and the 10 allotment of times. We're pleased to have with us this morning 11 Dr. Kathleen Rest, who is the acting director of NIOSH -- Rust, I said Rest -- it is Rest; I get a 12 little rust on my eyes here. Dr. Rest is acting 13 director of NIOSH. We're pleased to have her with 11 us this morning again. And Dr. Rest, if you would, please come and address the group and we'll give you the podium here for that purpose. Thank you. 1 DR. REST: Thank you and good morning, everyone. I guess we have to speak up over the 2 rain. Larry Elliott just looked up and said I hope this doesn't leak. 3 I'm happy to be here this morning and to welcome all of you again on behalf of NIOSH, the 4 National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, to this the fourth meeting of this Advisory 5 Board on Radiation and Worker Health. And I'd like to start off first of all by thanking you for all of 6 the efforts that you've made on behalf of NIOSH, HHS and this program. Really and truly, you've worked 7 very hard over the past number of months to help us meet some of the new responsibilities and 8 accomplishments that we had to achieve, and I truly appreciate the energy and the dedication that you 9 brought to the task, so thank you very much for that. 10 Now I think that you all know that this program is really a very high-priority program both 11 for NIOSH and for the Department of Health and Human Services. And we at NIOSH have been working really 12 hard to be able to deliver on the many new 13 responsibilities that we've been given under this 12 program. Larry Elliott later on this morning is going to give you more of an up-date and status report and 1 some of the details on our activities to date, but I just wanted to highlight a couple of significant 2 milestones for you and we can turn it over and get on with the grist of the meeting. 3 I think that you all know that as of today the final rules on dose reconstruction and 4 probability of causation have been published in the Federal Register, thanks in part to your own intense 5 efforts to help us make this happen.
Recommended publications
  • Section Ii: General Abstracting Instructions
    SECTION II: GENERAL ABSTRACTING INSTRUCTIONS 60 SECTION II: GENERAL ABSTRACTING INSTRUCTIONS It is the responsibility of every abstractor to know the content of the FCDS Data Acquisition Manual (DAM) and to update it upon receipt of any change from FCDS. Should you need training in cancer registry data collection, please visit the FCDS Learning Management System and consider taking the FCDS Abstracting Basics Course to gain a better understanding of the skills and training required to meet FCDS abstracting requirements and the national standards used when abstracting and coding cancer cases. This manual is intended to explain in detail each data item required for Florida Cancer Data System (FCDS) case reporting. It should be used as the primary information resource for any data item that must be coded and documented in accordance with Florida cancer reporting rules and statutes. Descriptions are only intended to provide sufficient detail to achieve consensus in submitting the required data. In no way does this manual imply any restriction on the type or degree of detail information collected, classified or studied within any healthcare facility-based cancer registry. Special Use Fields are available as needed. Basic Rules: 1) Always refer to the FCDS Data Acquisition Manual when completing an abstract. 2) Always submit a separate abstract for each reportable primary neoplasm identified. 3) Use leading zeros when necessary to right justify. 4) Text is required to adequately justify ALL coded values and to document supplemental information such as patient and family history of malignancy. Data items MUST be well documented in text field(s); specifically, Place of Diagnosis, Physical Exam, X-rays and Scans, Scopes and Diagnostic Tools, Surgical Procedures and Findings, Laboratory and Pathology (including: Dates of Specimen Collection, Primary Site, Histology, Behavior and Grade), and the Collaborative Stage data items including both core items and site specific factors.
    [Show full text]
  • Cancer Basics for the Caregiver It Is Common to Make Many Assumptions When You Hear the Word “Cancer.” Cancer Is Not One Disease, but Rather a Family of Diseases
    Caregiver’s Guide Types of Caregiving Caregiving can range from 24/7 hands-on assistance to driving someone to appointments to long-distance caregiving. Every situation is different. Your loved one has cancer and you want to help. At first, it all seems overwhelming. Everything that you took for granted is suddenly uncertain. Many caregivers are naturally worried about the person with cancer, and also worried about the rest of life—taking care of other family members, paying the bills, maintaining the house, and so much more. It’s important to realize two things: 1) You’re not alone— many other people have been in this situation before, and 2) there are resources available to help. We’ve prepared this booklet to guide and assist you. Much depends on the needs of the patient, your What’s essential is to understand that the role of the relationship with the patient, and practical matters loved one is to support and comfort, not to “fix” the such as where you live. problem. Every caregiving situation has the potential to be both When people are diagnosed with cancer, they don’t rewarding and stressful—often at the same time. want their loved ones to say, “I promise you that you’ll be cured.” In addition to worrying about your loved one’s cancer, you may be running the household, struggling What they want to hear is, “I love you and I’ll be here with piles of incomprehensible insurance forms, with you for whatever comes.” communicating with far-flung family members, and trying to earn enough money to pay the mounting bills.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to the Cancer Resource Center!
    Welcome to the Cancer Resource Center! We understand that this is a difficult time for you and your family. We are here to offer assistance throughout your diagnosis, treatment, recovery, and beyond. The welcome folder describes some of the services and support we provide to individuals and families affected by cancer. Please don’t hesitate to contact us if you have questions about any information contained in this folder. Our staff is happy to talk with you one-on-one to answer questions and to provide information and resources available both locally and nationally. We meet with couples and families as well and we always respect the confidentiality of everyone we meet with. We share information only when given permission to do so. CRC has a lending library of books and other materials that covers a wide range of cancer-related topics as well as a boutique featuring free wigs, hats, scarves, and other items that can be useful during some types of treatment. Our many support groups for individuals with cancer and their loved ones play an important role in providing assistance and connection to others with similar experiences. Our Financial Advocacy program can help provide assistance with financial concerns if needed. Our website (www.crcfl.net) includes many additional resources that may be of assistance to you and your family. We encourage you to visit it. If you do not have a computer, we will be happy to assist you in finding cancer-related information that we can mail to you. Our staff and volunteers are here to help you in any way we can.
    [Show full text]
  • Taking It Step by Step: a Guide for Women Diagnosed with Gynecological Cancer
    Taking it Step by Step A GUIDE FOR WOMEN DIAGNOSED WITH GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER With great thanks In This Guide Taking it Step by Step: A guide for women 1 Understanding Your Diagnosis _________ 3 diagnosed with gynecological cancer was envisioned and created by the BC/Yukon 2 Treatment Pathway & Timelines _______ 5 Women’s Cancer Information & Support Alliance. This group’s collaborative effort 3 Your Cancer Type _______________________6 includes: women with gynecological cancers; Uterine Cancer __________________________________6 the Canadian Cancer Society BC & Yukon; the Ovarian/Fallopian Tube Cancer ________________9 Gynecologic Tumour Group and Supportive Care Cervical Cancer ________________________________12 Professionals, BC Cancer Agency; Ovarian Cancer Vulvar Cancer __________________________________15 Canada Pacific Yukon Region and UBC School of Vaginal Cancer _________________________________17 Physical Therapy. The production and design for Taking it Step 4 Understanding Your Pathology Report _19 by Step was generously funded by the Cancer Program, Public Health Agency of Canada. The 5 Getting Ready _________________________20 views expressed herein do not represent the views of the Public Health Agency of Canada 6 Questions For Your Medical Team _____21 The printing and ongoing evaluation of Taking 7 Other Common Questions ____________22 it Step by Step is generously funded by the BC Cancer Foundation. The BC Cancer Foundation 8 Your Emotions __________________________23 is an independent charitable organization that raises
    [Show full text]
  • Integrative Oncology Program Focuses on Optimizing Cancer Treatment and a Return to Wellness
    VOLUME 8 • ISSUE 1 A NEWSLETTER FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Sponsored by the Dr. Diane Barton Complementary Medicine Program Integrative Oncology Program Focuses on Optimizing Cancer Treatment and a Return to Wellness “Hippocrates, the Greek physician and “father of medicine,” whose plements, physical activity and stress modifcation for patients who have com- oath all physicians take before entering into the practice of pleted cancer therapy. medicine, once said, “It is more important to know what sort of MD Anderson Cancer Center in Hous- person has a disease than to know what sort of disease a person ton, TX has been at the forefront of can- has.” This quote captures the essence of Integrative Medicine, a cer care for decades and was one of the feld that combines the best of mainstream, conventional therapies frst cancer centers in the nation to develop a program in integrative medicine. Fol- with complementary therapies while optimizing a healthy lifestyle, lowing their lead, and under Dr. Mehta’s all in a manner that is truly evidence-based.” – Pallav K. Mehta, MD guidance, the Integrative Oncology Pro- gram at MD Anderson Cooper focuses on he paradigm of cancer care approach, MD Anderson Coop- incorporating the three pillars of a healthy Thas been shifting greatly er has created the Integrative lifestyle – nutrition, physical activity and over the past decade and con- Oncology Program, led by emotional health – into the patient’s care tinues to do so at a rapid pace. Pallav K. Mehta, MD. plan, no matter where they are in their Advances in surgical tech- Dr. Mehta comes to MD An- cancer journey.
    [Show full text]
  • K Breast Diseases K Hyperplasia Hyperplasia Is an Overgrowth of Cells That Most Often Occurs on the Inside of the Lobules Or Milk Ducts in the Breast
    k Breast Diseases k Hyperplasia Hyperplasia is an overgrowth of cells that most often occurs on the inside of the lobules or milk ducts in the breast. There are two main types of hyperplasia—usual and atypical. Both increase the risk of breast cancer, though atypical hyperplasia does so to a greater degree. k Cysts Cysts are fluid-filled sacs that are almost always benign and more common in premenopausal women. After menopause, cysts occur less often. Cysts do not increase the risk of breast cancer. Although most cysts are too small to feel, some are large enough that they may feel like lumps in the breast and may cause breast pain. k Fibroadenomas Fibroadenomas are solid benign tumors most common in younger women, between the ages of 15 and 35. Most fibroadenomas do not increase the risk of breast cancer. Often, they do not need treatment. However, if a fibroadenoma is large or causes discomfort or worry, it may be removed. k Intraductal papillomas Intraductal papillomas are small growths that occur in the milk ducts of the breasts and can cause nipple discharge. A lump may be felt, may be painful and are removed with surgery with need no further treatment. They do not increase the risk of breast cancer unless they have abnormal cells or there is ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in the nearby tissue. k Sclerosing adenosis Sclerosing adenosis are small breast lumps caused by enlarged lobules. A lump may be felt and may be painful. Sclerosing adenosis may be found on a mammogram. Because it has a distorted shape, it may be mistaken for breast cancer.
    [Show full text]
  • Palliative Nursing Across the Spectrum of Care
    P1: SFK/XXX P2: SFK BLBK147-Stevens February 12, 2009 6:59 Palliative Nursing Across the Spectrum of Care Edited by Elaine Stevens Susan Jackson Stuart Milligan A John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Publication iii P1: SFK/XXX P2: SFK BLBK147-Stevens February 12, 2009 6:59 Palliative Nursing i P1: SFK/XXX P2: SFK BLBK147-Stevens February 12, 2009 6:59 ii P1: SFK/XXX P2: SFK BLBK147-Stevens February 12, 2009 6:59 Palliative Nursing Across the Spectrum of Care Edited by Elaine Stevens Susan Jackson Stuart Milligan A John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Publication iii P1: SFK/XXX P2: SFK BLBK147-Stevens February 12, 2009 6:59 This edition first published 2009 C 2009 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd Blackwell Publishing was acquired by John Wiley & Sons in February 2007. Blackwell’s publishing programme has been merged with Wiley’s global Scientific, Technical, and Medical business to form Wiley-Blackwell. Registered office John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 8SQ, United Kingdom Editorial offices 9600 Garsington Road, Oxford, OX4 2DQ, United Kingdom 2121 State Avenue, Ames, Iowa 50014-8300, USA For details of our global editorial offices, for customer services and for information about how to apply for permission to reuse the copyright material in this book please see our website at www.wiley.com/wiley-blackwell. The right of the author to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, except as permitted by the UK Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, without the prior permission of the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Current and Future Development in Lung Cancer Diagnosis
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Current and Future Development in Lung Cancer Diagnosis Reem Nooreldeen and Horacio Bach * Division of Infectious Diseases, Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6H 3Z6, Canada; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-604-875-4111 (ext. 62107) Abstract: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in North America and other developed countries. One of the reasons lung cancer is at the top of the list is that it is often not diagnosed until the cancer is at an advanced stage. Thus, the earliest diagnosis of lung cancer is crucial, especially in screening high-risk populations, such as smokers, exposure to fumes, oil fields, toxic occupational places, etc. Based on the current knowledge, it looks that there is an urgent need to identify novel biomarkers. The current diagnosis of lung cancer includes different types of imaging complemented with pathological assessment of biopsies, but these techniques can still not detect early lung cancer developments. In this review, we described the advantages and disadvantages of current methods used in diagnosing lung cancer, and we provide an analysis of the potential use of body fluids as carriers of biomarkers as predictors of cancer development and progression. Keywords: lung cancer; diagnosis; imaging; biomarkers; predictors; body fluids 1. Introduction Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related deaths in North America Citation: Nooreldeen, R.; Bach, H. and other developed countries. According to the 2020 special report on lung cancer, this Current and Future Development in disease is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer death in Lung Cancer Diagnosis.
    [Show full text]
  • We Have Kidney Cancer Survivors Stories Inspiration and Advice from Patients and Caregivers
    2012 Edition The Kidney Cancer Association Presents... We Have Kidney Cancer Survivors Stories Inspiration and advice from patients and caregivers Supported by KidneyCancer.org FOREWORD I am always thrilled to meet fellow kidney cancer survivors and their families. When I was diagnosed 18 years ago with Stage III kidney cancer, the only encouragement I received from my surgeon was that he would “make me as comfortable and happy as possible.” As a straightforward New Yorker, I decided that “comfortable and happy” wasn’t going to cut it with me. I very sweetly advised him that I had “comfortable and happy” covered; I needed him to do something more. Following a radical nephrectomy of a 10 cm tumor (that was classified as papillary), I endured one year of low-dose subcutaneous immunotherapy – at the time, the only FDA approved treatment on the market -- and was pronounced cancer-free. Six months later, a lymph node surfaced in my neck; it was malignant. What to do? My oncologist put me on a chemotherapy regimen that combined two other chemical agents. It was an extremely challenging treatment, but it seems to have worked. I have subsequently had all sorts of “quirky” medical issues, “Duringmyexperience but, fortunately, kidney cancer has not been among them. withcancer,Icametorealize During my experience with cancer, I came to realize that one thatonethingwealways thing we always need is HOPE. Kidney cancer statistics are needisHOPE.” daunting and can weigh heavily on one’s state of mind. This is what propelled me to become involved with the Kidney Cancer Association: I wanted to be the voice for those unable to speak up; the shoulder for those who needed a boost; and, most importantly, the one who provided hope when things looked grim.
    [Show full text]
  • Unmet Needs Related to the Quality of Life of Advanced Cancer Patients In
    Pyo et al. BMC Palliative Care (2021) 20:58 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-021-00749-8 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Unmet needs related to the quality of life of advanced cancer patients in Korea: a qualitative study Jeehee Pyo1,2, Minsu Ock1*, Mina Lee1, Juhee Kim3, Jaekyung Cheon3, Juhee Cho4, Jung Hye Kwon5, Hyeyeoung Kim3, Hyeon-Su Im3, Young Joo Min3 and Su-Jin Koh3* Abstract Background: It has recently been emphasized that the unmet needs of cancer patients should be evaluated more holistically, for example, by exploring caregivers’ perspectives and cross cultural differences. This study explored additional domains or items of unmet needs among Korean cancer patients in reference to the Sheffield Profile for Assessment and Referral to Care (SPARC). Methods: We conducted four focus group discussions (FGDs) with 15 cancer patients, following a semi-structured format to elicit participants’ health perceptions, comments on SPARC, and opinions on the roles of medical professionals to improve the health-related quality of life of cancer patients. We analyzed the verbatim transcripts using a content analysis method. Results: The following themes were derived: living as a cancer patient, striving to overcome cancer, changing attitudes toward life after the cancer diagnosis, and ways to live a better life as a cancer patient. The participants asserted the significance of providing adequate treatment information that is easily understood by cancer patients during the conversation between patients and medical professionals. Besides the physical symptoms identified by SPARC, the participants struggled with numbness in their hands and feet and hair loss. Korean cancer patients prominently wished to avoid burdening their family or others in their daily life.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record—House H400
    H400 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE February 10, 2004 Burglary and robbery are reasons for In short, between 8 and 10 million Mr. Speaker, I firmly believe we can people to be indicted and sent to jail. people die needlessly every year be- end hunger among children, both here That is what happened to G. Gordon cause of hunger and malnutrition. in the United States and around the Liddy, that is what happened to How- Last year, the World Health Organi- world. It only takes the time, commit- ard Hunt, and we will see whether the zation listed the top 10 health risks ment, and political will to do so. Republicans in control of this House around the world. The number one risk f and the other body, and in control of is not cancer or HIV/AIDS or heart dis- Washington and all of its agencies, will ease. It is not war or armed conflict or RECESS make sure that there is a criminal in- accidents. The number one health risk The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. vestigation of this theft. Stealing from in the world is simply the lack of food. BOOZMAN). Pursuant to clause 12(a) of a safe is wrong, even if one has been In an effort to reach out to students rule I, the Chair declares the House in trusted with the combination. and communities throughout the If this does not happen, then we in United States, the World Food Pro- recess until 2 p.m. today. the House will have to look at the addi- gramme has launched a campaign to Accordingly (at 1 o’clock and 1 tional governmental expense involved raise money and awareness about the minute p.m.), the House stood in recess in having a separate Democratic e-mail hunger and educational needs of chil- until 2 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Coming to Consensus Wilmot's Multidisciplinary Approach P. 6
    2016 Volume I Wilmot Cancer Institute | University of Rochester Medical Center Coming to consensus Wilmot’s multidisciplinary approach p. 6 Letter from the Director Hello Friends of Wilmot Cancer Institute, Since our last issue, we learned of the $1 billion “moonshot” initiative for cancer research announced by President Obama and Vice President Biden. Although many details are still unknown, we are excited about what this announcement means for Wilmot, and most importantly our patients. At Wilmot, we continue to grow our robust research programs. We are studying the common features of cancers – including cells’ ability to thrive and spread despite aggressive treatment – to find new ways to attack the core of what makes cells cancerous. We also have our own “moonshot” project underway to accelerate the pace of drug discovery by studying the additional properties of approved cancer therapies and finding ways to Jonathan W. Friedberg, M.D., M.M.Sc. repurpose them. Director, Wilmot Cancer Institute Our team-science approach, advocated by the “moonshot” initiative, includes more than 100 investigators. It is yielding promising results in immunotherapy, which engages the immune system to fight cancer, and in precision medicine, which uses specific features of a person’s cancer to help diagnose and more effectively treat their disease. With additional federal, state and philanthropic resources, we are actively recruiting additional senior scientists to synergize with our existing teams, enabling us to compete for program grants, the highest level of support from the National Cancer Institute. Research also informs our approach to care every day, and it allows us to offer cutting- edge therapies and technology.
    [Show full text]