Pocc~). ~AH~BAH~Iaflen~, Kopmhbklhe CBOHX Ntehuob, Perynxpho ~06B1~Ankikphjix (Euphausia Superba) Ha Kohtahehtanbhom Iliejib@E, T.E

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pocc~). ~AH~BAH~Iaflen~, Kopmhbklhe CBOHX Ntehuob, Perynxpho ~06B1~Ankikphjix (Euphausia Superba) Ha Kohtahehtanbhom Iliejib@E, T.E CCAMLR Science, Vol. 4 (1997): 75-87 THE FORAGING RANGE OF ADELIE PENGUINS - IMPLICATIONS FOR CEMP AND INTERACTIONS WITH THE KRILL FISHERY K.R. Kerry, J.R. Clarke, S. Eberhard, H. Gardner, R.M. Lawless, R. Tremont and B.C. Wienecke Australian Antarctic Division, Channel Highway Kingston 7050, Tasmania, Australia S. Corsolini, S. Focardi, E. Franchi Dipartimento di Biologia Ambientale, Universita di Siena via della Cerchia 3,53100 Siena, Italy D. Rodary Centre dlEcologie et Physiologie Energetique CNRS, 23 Rue Becqueral, 67087 Strasbourg, France R. Thomson Department of Zoology, University of Cape Town Rondeboscl~7700, South Africa Abstract This paper presents a summary of the foraging locations of Adelie penguins, determined by satellite tracking, at seven widely-spaced breeding colonies along the coast of eastern Antarctica between 55"E (Enderby Land) and 175"E (Ross Sea). Adelie penguins feeding chicks regularly travelled up to 120 km offshore to the continental shelf and returned with krill, Etlplzausza superba. Locations of penguins on foraging trips were compared with historical records of fine-scale krill catch data for the regions of interest. The potential for overlap with krill fishing occurs particularly where ice conditions permit the fishing fleet to approach the edge of the continental shelf or where penguins forage downstream from the fishery. It is suggested that the potential for overlap between foraging areas of Adelie penguins and fishable concentrations of krill be investigated before a decision is made to establish a new CEMP site. Resume L'auteur presente une recapitulation des secteurs d'approvisionnement determines par des suivis par satellite de manchots Addie de sept colonies de reproduction largement espacees le long de la c6te est de lfAntarctique, entre 55"E (terre Enderby) et 175OE (mer de Ross). Les manchots Adelie nourrissant leurs jeunes parcourent regulierement jusqu'a 120 km au large, jusqu'au plateau continental et reviennent avec du krill, Etlphazlsia superba. La position des manchots lors des sorties alimentaires est comparee aux anciennes donnees a echelle precise de captures de krill des regions en question. I1 est possible que la p@cheriede krill entre en competition avec les manchots, notamment lorsque les conditions glaciaires permettent a la flottille de p&chede s'approcher de la bordure du plateau continental ou lorsque les manchots s'approvisionnent en aval de la p6cherie. I1 est suggere d'etudier le chevauchement potentiel des secteurs d'alimentation des manchots Adelie et des concentrations exploitables de krill avant que ne soit prise la d6cision de mettre en place de nouveaux sites du CEMP. B ~aCT02~efipa60l.e npeACTaBneHa CBOAKa AaHHbIX no HarYnbHbIM apeanaM nHHrBMHOB Anen~,OnpeAeneHHblM C IlOMOWbH) CnYTHAKOBOrO CJIeKeHMX, H3 CeMH AaneKO paCnOnOXeHHbIX Apyr OT Apyra rHe3AOBbIX KO~OHM&BAOnb BOCTOYHOrO n06epe~bRAHT~~KTHQ~I MelKQy 5S0e.fl. (3e~nR3~Aep6M) 11 175"~.~.(~Ope Pocc~). ~AH~BAH~IAflen~, KopMHBKlHe CBOHX nTeHuOB, PerynXpHO ~06b1~ankiKpHJIX (Euphausia superba) Ha KOHTAHeHTanbHOM ILIeJIb@e, T.e. B 120 KM OT n06epembx. &IHH~I~no MeCTOnOnOXeHMKl IlMHrBHHOB, COBepILIMBKlHX nOXOAbI 3a nHwefi, 6bmM CpaBHeHbI C peTpOCneKTHBHbIMki M~JIKOM~CLLIT~~H~IMHAaHHbIMH no YnOBaM KPMJlSI, IlOny~eHHbIMB H3YYaeMbIX pafio~ax.Ha~nyym~e YCJIOBHX AJlX KOHKypeHUAH MeX,L(y nHHrBMHaMH H npOMbICJloM KpHnX CO3naWTCX TOrna, KOrna JIenOBaX O~CT~HOBK~ Kerry et al. 1103~onxe~cynaM pa60ra~b6na3~o K rpaHMqe ruenbaa kinM ~arynb~briiapean IlHHrBMHOB HaXOAMTCZI BHH3 I'IPOMbICnOBOrO YYaCTKa IIO TeqeHMto. aenae~cx IIpennOXeHMe 0 TOM, ~~0661A0 I'IPMHSITHSI peIUeHHSI 06 YqPeXAeHEiH HOBOrO YyaCTKa CEMP 6-bm IIOfiBeprHyT M3yYeHMto BOIIpOC BOlMOXHOrO COBMeIUeHMR HaryJlbHbIX apeanOB IlMHrBllHOB AnenM M IIpOMbICnOBbIX KOH~~HTP~UH~KpHn51. Resumen Este trabajo presenta un resumen de 10s lugares de alimentacion de 10s pingiiinos adelia, determinados mediante el rastreo por satklite de siete colol~iasde reproduccion situadas a gran distancia entre si, a lo largo de la costa este de la Antirtida entre 10s 55"E (Territorio de Enderby) y 175"E (Mar de Ross). Los pingiiinos adelia que alimentaban a sus polluelos hicieron viajes regulares hasta la plataforma continental (aprox. 120 km de la costa), y retornaron con kril, Etiphausia superba. Se hizo una comparacion entre las zonas de alimentacion de 10s pingiiinos y 10s registros l~istoricosde las capturas de kril a escala fina ell las regiones de inter&. La posibilidad de que ocurra una superposicion con la pesqueria de kril aumenta cuando las condiciones del hie10 son tales que permiten un acercamiento de la flota pesquera a1 borde de la plataforma continental, o cuando 10s pingiiinos se alimentan corriente abajo del lugar donde esti operando la pesqueria. Se propone investigar primero la posible superposicion entre las zonas de alimentacion de 10s pingiiinos adelia y las concentraciones explotables de kril, antes de decidir el establecimiento de nuevas localidades del CEMP. Keywords: Adklie, Casey, CEMP, Dumont dfUrville, foraging, krill, Mawson, monitoring, penguin, satellite tracking, Terra Nova Bay, CCAMLR INTRODUCTION undertaken to determine the foraging range of breeding Adelie penguins and to examine the The CCAMLR Ecosystem Monitoring Program temporal and spatial constraints facing them (CEMP) seeks to determine whether the harvest of when it comes to obtaining food for their krill is likely to have an impact on krill predators. offspring. The following presents a synthesis of Although Adelie penguins are being monitored at all tracking data obtained from the above sites a number of sites around Antarctica, a spatial between the 1992/93 and 1995/96 breeding overlap between the foraging areas of these birds seasons, and compares these foraging locations and the areas where krill fishing has taken place with fine-scale catch data on Antarctic krill, in the previous seasons was demonstrated only in Euphat~siaszlpevba, for each of the s~~bareas. the case of Bechervaise Island (67"311S, 62'49'E) near Mawson Station (Kerry et al., 1992, 1995a). The possibility of an overlap between the krill METHODS fishery and the foraging areas of penguins at locations in the Antarctic Peninsula region Locations of the Adelie penguin colonies from (Subarea 48.1) was investigated by Agnew (1992) which tracking was undertaken are shown in based on the time penguins are away from their Figure 1. The numbers of penguins tracked, the colonies and their average swimming speed as numbers of trips and the years over which reported by, for example, Lishman (1985) and tracking took place are provided in Table 1. Trivelpiece et al. (1987). Since then, however, significant competition between the overall The ARGOS satellite Global Positioning penguin population and this krill fishery has been System (GPS) was used to track penguins. The considered unlikely because the preferred fishing method for tracking birds by ARGOS satellite areas are not adjacent to the largest penguin telemetry is given in Kerry et al. (1995a). The colonies (Ichii et al., 1994; Agnew and Phegan, locations of all satellite fixes of ARGOS quality 1 1995). or better (i.e. the geolocation should be within 1 km of the true position; ARGOS, 1996) are We have been tracking Adelie penguins on plotted in Figure 2 for the Mawson and Davis foraging trips by satellite for up to five breeding regions, and in Figure 3a-c for Casey, Dumont seasons at seven sites along the coast of eastern d'urville and Edmonson Point. Foraging Antarctica. Four of the sites are in CCAMLR locations of birds rearing chicks were determined Statistical Division 58.4.2, two in Division 58.4.1 at each site during every season in which tracking and one in Subarea 88.1 (Figure 1). This work was was carried out. In addition, penguins foraging The Foraging Range of AdPlie Penguins Table 1: Number of AdPlie penguins tracked for each location. I Location of Colony I Years Bechervaise Island (Mawson) Scullin Monolith Ufs Island Magnetic Island (Davis) Sl-tirley Island (Casey) Petrel Island (Dumont d'urville) Edmonson Point during incubation were tracked at Bechervaise approximately the position of the continental Island, Magnetic Island and Edmonson Point. No shelf break. Individual tracks of penguins from distinction is made between male and female this colony are reported in Kerry et al. (1995a). At foraging patterns, although differences have been Davis, birds foraging during the incubation demonstrated (Clarke et al., 1995). The position period headed northwards and some reached the data are presented as a cloud of points since the continental slope. purpose of this paper is to show where the birds concentrate to forage rather than to present Penguins foraging for their chicks at the individual foraging trips. Bechervaise Island CEMP site travelled up to 120 km north to northwest from the colony in a The data on krill catches presented in V-shaped area with an angle of approximately Figures 2b and 3a-c were derived from the records 30". Whilst fast-ice was still present they walked submitted by Japan and held in the CCAMLR to the closest edge of a polynya which forms each Data Centre. These data are shown as the sum of year in this region (Kerry et al., 1995a). The all past harvests of krill taken within a grid of location of this polynya may often be identified 0.5" latitude by 1" longitude (approximately from the colony by the presence of 'water sky''. 30 km by 30 km) between 1972 and 1994. They Birds from Ufs Island tracked during the early are taken as indicating the consistent presence of creche period also showed a similar V-shaped harvestable amounts of krill. Details of a foraging area. At Scullin Monolith, to the east of hydroacoustic survey which covers areas close to Mawson, birds tended to move in a northeasterly Casey and Dumont dlUrville in March 1996 are direction, but once out near the shelf break moved presented separately in Nicol et al.
Recommended publications
  • MARINE ORNITHOLOGY Vol
    MARINE ORNITHOLOGY Vol. 26 Nos 1 & 2 ISSN 1018-3337 1998 Contents Pages S. HAHN, H.-U. PETER, P. QUILLFELDT & K. REINHARDT. The birds of the Potter Peninsula, King George Island, South Shetland Islands, Antarctica, 1965–1998 ........................................................................ 1–6 S. KENT, J. SEDDON, G. ROBERTSON & B.C. WIENECKE. Diet of Adélie Penguins Pygoscelis adeliae at Shirley Island, East Antarctica, January 1992 ......................................................................................... 7–10 P. YORIO, M. BERTELLOTTI, P. GANDINI & E. FRERE. Kelp gulls Larus dominicanus breeding on the Argentine coast: population status and relationship with coastal management and conservation ............... 11–18 K. GREEN, K.R. KERRY, T. DISNEY & M.R. CLARKE. Dietary studies of Light-Mantled Sooty Albatrosses Phoebetria palpebrata from Macquarie and Heard Islands ................................................................. 19–26 K. GREEN, R. WILLIAMS & M.G. GREEN. Foraging ecology and diving behaviour of Macaroni Penguins Eudyptes Chrysolophus at Heard Island .................................................................................................. 27–34 R.J. CASAUX, E.R. BARRERA-ORO, M. FAVERO & P. SILVA. New correction factors for the quantification of fish represented in pellets of the Imperial Cormorant Phalacrocorax atriceps........................... 35–39 N.N. THUMSER & M.S. FICKEN. A comparison of the vocal repertoires of captive Spheniscus penguins .............. 41–48 D.H.R. SPENNEMANN.
    [Show full text]
  • The Antarctic Treaty
    Miscellaneous No. 7 (2007) The Antarctic Treaty Measures adopted at the Twenty-ninth Consultative Meeting held at Edinburgh 12 – 23 June 2006 Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs by Command of Her Majesty July 2007 Cm 7167 £17.00 Miscellaneous No. 7 (2007) The Antarctic Treaty Measures adopted at the Twenty-ninth Consultative Meeting held at Edinburgh 12 – 23 June 2006 Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs by Command of Her Majesty July 2007 Cm 7167 £17.00 © Crown copyright 2007 The text in this document (excluding the Royal Arms and departmental logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the document specified. Any enquiries relating to the copyright in this document should be addressed to the Licensing Division, HMSO, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ. Fax 01603 723000 or e-mail: [email protected] MEASURES ADOPTED AT THE TWENTY-NINTH CONSULTATIVE MEETING HELD AT EDINBURGH 12 - 23 JUNE 2006 The Measures1 adopted at the Twenty-ninth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting are reproduced below from the Final Report of the Meeting. In accordance with Article IX, paragraph 4, of the Antarctic Treaty, the Measures adopted at Consultative Meetings become effective upon approval by all Contracting Parties whose representatives were entitled to participate in the meeting at which they were adopted (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Pygoscelis Adeliae) Faeces Sampled at the Cape Crozier Colony, Antarctica
    Journal of General Virology (2014), 95, 1352–1365 DOI 10.1099/vir.0.064436-0 A novel papillomavirus in Ade´lie penguin (Pygoscelis adeliae) faeces sampled at the Cape Crozier colony, Antarctica Arvind Varsani,1,2,3 Simona Kraberger,1 Scott Jennings,4 Elizabeth L. Porzig,5 Laurel Julian,1 Melanie Massaro,6 Annie Pollard,5 Grant Ballard7 and David G. Ainley5 Correspondence 1School of Biological Sciences and Biomolecular Interaction Centre, University of Canterbury, Arvind Varsani Private Bag 4800, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand [email protected] 2Department of Plant Pathology and Emerging Pathogens Institute, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA 3Electron Microscope Unit, Division of Medical Biochemistry, Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, University of Cape Town, Observatory, 7700, South Africa 4Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, US Geological Survey, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA 5HT Harvey and Associates, Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA 6School of Environmental Sciences, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW 2640, Australia 7Point Blue Conservation Science, Petaluma, CA 94954, USA Papillomaviruses are epitheliotropic viruses that have circular dsDNA genomes encapsidated in non-enveloped virions. They have been found to infect a variety of mammals, reptiles and birds, but so far they have not been found in amphibians. Using a next-generation sequencing de novo assembly contig-informed recovery, we cloned and Sanger sequenced the complete genome of a novel papillomavirus from the faecal matter of Ade´lie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) nesting on Ross Island, Antarctica. The genome had all the usual features of a papillomavirus and an E9 ORF encoding a protein of unknown function that is found in all avian papillomaviruses to date.
    [Show full text]
  • November 1960 I Believe That the Major Exports of Antarctica Are Scientific Data
    JIET L S. Antarctic Projects OfficerI November 1960 I believe that the major exports of Antarctica are scientific data. Certainly that is true now and I think it will be true for a long time and I think these data may turn out to be of vastly, more value to all mankind than all of the mineral riches of the continent and the life of the seas that surround it. The Polar Regions in Their Relation to Human Affairs, by Laurence M. Gould (Bow- man Memorial Lectures, Series Four), The American Geographiql Society, New York, 1958 page 29.. I ITOJ TJM II IU1viBEt 3 IToveber 1960 CONTENTS 1 The First Month 1 Air Operations 2 Ship Oper&tions 3 Project MAGNET NAF McMurdo Sounds October Weather 4 4 DEEP FREEZE 62 Volunteers Solicited A DAY AT TEE SOUTH POLE STATION, by Paul A Siple 5 in Antarctica 8 International Cooperation 8 Foreign Observer Exchange Program 9 Scientific Exchange Program NavyPrograrn 9 Argentine Navy-U.S. Station Cooperation 9 10 Other Programs 10 Worlds Largest Aircraft in Antarctic Operation 11 ANTARCTICA, by Emil Schulthess The Antarctic Treaty 11 11 USNS PRIVATE FRANIC 3. FETRARCA (TAK-250) 1961 Scientific Leaders 12 NAAF Little Rockford Reopened 13 13 First Flight to Hallett Station 14 Simmer Operations Begin at South Pole First DEEP FREEZE 61 Airdrop 14 15 DEEP FREEZE 61 Cargo Antarctic Real Estate 15 Antarctic Chronology,. 1960-61 16 The 'AuuOiA vises to t):iank Di * ?a]. A, Siple for his artj.ole Wh.4b begins n page 5 Matera1 for other sections of bhis issue was drawn from radio messages and fran information provided bY the DepBr1nozrt of State the Nat0na1 Academy , of Soienoes the NatgnA1 Science Fouxidation the Office 6f NAval Re- search, and the U, 3, Navy Hydziograpbio Offioe, Tiis, issue of tie 3n oovers: i16, aótivitiès o events 11 Novóiber The of the Uxitéd States.
    [Show full text]
  • Measure 3 (2009) Annex a Management Plan for Antarctic Specially Protected Area No. 104 SABRINA ISLAND, NORTHERN ROSS SEA, ANTA
    Measure 3 (2009) Annex A Management Plan For Antarctic Specially Protected Area No. 104 SABRINA ISLAND, NORTHERN ROSS SEA, ANTARCTICA Introduction Sabrina Island, in the Balleny Archipelago, was originally designated as SPA No. 4 in Recommendation IV-4 (1966) on the grounds that “The Balleny Islands, as the most northerly Antarctic land in the Ross Sea region, support fauna and flora which reflect many circumpolar distributions at this latitude and that Sabrina Island in particular provides a representative sample of such fauna and flora.” 1. Description of values to be protected Sabrina Island has outstanding environmental and scientific value. It is a representative sample of the Balleny Islands which is the only oceanic archipelago located within the main Antarctic Coastal Current. (Peter I Island, some 4000km away, is the only other oceanic island in the Current). As such, they provide important resting and breeding habitat for seabird and seal species (see Tables 1 and 2), and are significant in circumpolar distributions of a variety of species. Being isolated and prone to difficult weather and ice conditions, the Islands have had very little human disturbance. The Islands are the only known breeding site for chinstrap penguins (Pygoscelis antarctica) between Bouvetoya and Peter I Islands (a span of 264° longitude). The chinstrap nests occur within Adélie penguin (Pygoscelis adeliae) colonies. Adélies and chinstraps have very different breeding ranges and there are few sites where the species coexist. Sabrina Island’s Adélie colony is of particular importance because it is the largest in the archipelago (and has the majority of the chinstrap pairs), and because it is growing very rapidly.
    [Show full text]
  • ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT – AUSTRALIAN ANTARCTIC PROGRAM AVIATION OPERATIONS 2020-2025 Draft Released for Public Comment
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT – AUSTRALIAN ANTARCTIC PROGRAM AVIATION OPERATIONS 2020-2025 draft released for public comment This document should be cited as: Commonwealth of Australia (2020). Environmental Impact Assessment – Australian Antarctic Program Aviation Operations 2020-2025 – draft released for public comment. Australian Antarctic Division, Kingston. © Commonwealth of Australia 2020 This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to. Disclaimer The contents of this document have been compiled using a range of source materials and were valid as at the time of its preparation. The Australian Government is not liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of or reliance on the contents of the document. Cover photos from L to R: groomed runway surface, Globemaster C17 at Wilkins Aerodrome, fuel drum stockpile at Davis, Airbus landing at Wilkins Aerodrome Prepared by: Dr Sandra Potter on behalf of: Mr Robb Clifton Operations Manager Australian Antarctic Division Kingston 7050 Australia 2 Contents Overview 7 1. Background 9 1.1 Australian Antarctic Program aviation 9 1.2 Previous assessments of aviation activities 10 1.3 Scope of this environmental impact assessment 11 1.4 Consultation and decision outcomes 12 2. Details of the proposed activity and its need 13 2.1 Introduction 13 2.2 Inter-continental flights 13 2.3 Air-drop operations 14 2.4 Air-to-air refuelling operations 14 2.5 Operation of Wilkins Aerodrome 15 2.6 Intra-continental fixed-wing operations 17 2.7 Operation of ski landing areas 18 2.8 Helicopter operations 18 2.9 Fuel storage and use 19 2.10 Aviation activities at other sites 20 2.11 Unmanned aerial systems 20 2.12 Facility decommissioning 21 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigations for Utilizing Pteropods As Bioindicators of Environmental Change Along the Western Antarctic Peninsula
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School January 2013 Investigations for utilizing pteropods as bioindicators of environmental change along the western Antarctic Peninsula Paul Mark Suprenand University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Other Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons Scholar Commons Citation Suprenand, Paul Mark, "Investigations for utilizing pteropods as bioindicators of environmental change along the western Antarctic Peninsula" (2013). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/4588 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Investigations for Utilizing Pteropods as Bioindicators of Environmental Change Along the Western Antarctic Peninsula by Paul Mark Suprenand A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy College of Marine Science University of South Florida Co-Major Professor: Joseph J. Torres, Ph.D. Co-Major Professor: Pamela Hallock Muller, Ph.D. Cameron H. Ainsworth, Ph.D. David L. Jones, Ph.D. Brad A. Seibel, Ph.D. Date of Approval: March 19, 2013 Keywords: Climate Change, Ocean Acidification, Modelling, Ecology, Physiology Copyright © 2013, Paul Mark Suprenand Dedication I lovingly dedicate this dissertation to my wife, Lisa Suprenand, and my two sons Jack and Kai Suprenand for their continuous support, patience and love throughout this learning experience. I am endlessly thankful for my wife’s willingness to discover who we are as individuals and as parents, as well as for the boundless curiosity of our sons who taught me the joy in seeking answers to some of life’s most intriguing and simple questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Plan for Antarctic Specially Protected Area No. 136 CLARK PENINSULA, BUDD COAST, WILKES LAND, EAST ANTARCTICA
    Measure 5 (2014) Annex Management Plan for Antarctic Specially Protected Area No. 136 CLARK PENINSULA, BUDD COAST, WILKES LAND, EAST ANTARCTICA Introduction Antarctic Specially Protected Area (ASPA) No. 136 is located on Clark Peninsula, Wilkes Land at 66°15'S, 110°36'E (see Map A). The Clark Peninsula was originally designated as Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) No. 17 under Recommendation XIII-8 (1985). A revised management plan for SSSI 17 was adopted under Measure 1 (2000). The area was redesignated and renumbered as ASPA 136 under Decision 1 (2002). Revised ASPA management plans were adopted under Measure 1 (2006) and Measure 7 (2009). ASPA 136 is primarily designated to protect the Clark Peninsula’s largely undisturbed terrestrial ecosystem. This ecosystem possesses one of the most extensive Antarctic flora communities outside of the Antarctic Peninsula and significant breeding populations of Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) and south polar skuas (Catharacta maccormicki). ASPA 136 is approximately 9.4 km2 and is located approximately 5km north-west of Casey station. Scientific research within the Area has focused on plant communities and long term population studies of Adélie penguin colonies. The protection of this flora and fauna within the Area allows for valuable comparison with similar plant communities and penguin colonies closer to Casey station which are subject to greater levels of human disturbance. 1. Description of values to be protected ASPA 136 is primarily designated to protect Clark Peninsula’s largely undisturbed terrestrial ecosystem. Clark Peninsula’s ecosystem possesses one of the most extensive Antarctic flora communities outside of the Antarctic Peninsula.
    [Show full text]
  • Article (Refereed) - Postprint
    Article (refereed) - postprint Riddick, S.N.; Dragosits, U.; Blackall, T.D.; Daunt, F.; Wanless, S.; Sutton, M.A.. 2012 The global distribution of ammonia emissions from seabird colonies. Atmospheric Environment, 55. 319-327. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.02.052 © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. This version available http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/18186/ NERC has developed NORA to enable users to access research outputs wholly or partially funded by NERC. Copyright and other rights for material on this site are retained by the rights owners. Users should read the terms and conditions of use of this material at http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/policies.html#access NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Atmospheric Environment. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Atmospheric Environment, 55. 319-327. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.02.052 www.elsevier.com/ Contact CEH NORA team at [email protected] The NERC and CEH trademarks and logos (‘the Trademarks’) are registered trademarks of NERC in the UK and other countries, and may not be used without the prior written consent of the Trademark owner. The global distribution of ammonia emissions from seabird colonies S. N. Riddick1, 2, U. Dragosits3, T. D. Blackall4, F. Daunt5, S. Wanless6 and M. A. Sutton7 1 Centre
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Antarctic Program Aviation Operations 2020-2025
    ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT – AUSTRALIAN ANTARCTIC PROGRAM AVIATION OPERATIONS 2020-2025 This document should be cited as: Commonwealth of Australia (2020). Environmental Impact Assessment – Australian Antarctic Program Aviation Operations 2020-2025. Australian Antarctic Division, Kingston. © Commonwealth of Australia 2020 This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to. Disclaimer The contents of this document have been compiled using a range of source materials and were valid as at the time of its preparation. The Australian Government is not liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of or reliance on the contents of the document. Cover photos from L to R: groomed runway surface, Globemaster C17 at Wilkins Aerodrome, fuel drum stockpile at Davis, Airbus landing at Wilkins Aerodrome Prepared by: Dr Sandra Potter on behalf of: Charlton Clark General Manager Operations and Safety Australian Antarctic Division Kingston 7050 Australia 2 Contents Overview 7 1. Background 9 1.1 Australian Antarctic Program aviation 9 1.2 Previous assessments of aviation activities 10 1.3 Scope of this environmental impact assessment 11 1.4 Consultation 13 2. Details of the proposed activity and its need 14 2.1 Introduction 14 2.2 Inter-continental flights 14 2.3 Air-drop operations 15 2.4 Air-to-air refuelling operations 15 2.5 Operation of Wilkins Aerodrome 16 2.6 Intra-continental fixed-wing operations 18 2.7 Operation of ski landing areas 19 2.8 Helicopter operations 20 2.9 Fuel storage and use 20 2.10 Aviation activities at other sites 21 2.11 Unmanned aerial systems 22 2.12 Facility decommissioning 22 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report of the XXVI ATCM
    Final Report of XXVI ATCM FINAL REPORT 16/07/2003 1 Final Report of XXVI ATCM CONTENTS SUBJECT PAGE Acronyms and Abbreviations 4 PART I: FINAL REPORT OF XXVI ATCM 6 Appendix 1: Procedure for the Appointment of the Executive 40 Secretary of the Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty Appendix 2: Indicative estimates of the costs of the Secretariat of 45 The Antarctic Treaty. Part II: MEASURES, DECISIONS AND RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED 48 AT XXVI ATCM Annex A: Measures 49 Measure 1 (2003) Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty 50 Measure 2 (2003) Antarctic protected area system: 62 management plans for antarctic specially protected areas. ASPA No 105, Beaufort Island, Ross Sea; 63 ASPA No 114, Northern Coronation Island, South 82 Orkney Islands; ASPA No 118, Cryptogam Ridge, Mt Melbourne, 95 North Victoria Land and summit of Mt Melbourne, North Victoria Land; ASPA No 135, North-East Bailey Peninsula, Budd 106 Coast, Wilkes Land ASPA No 143, Marine Plain, Mule Peninsula, Vestfold 134 Hills, Princess Elizabeth Land; ASPA No 152, Western Bransfield Strait, Antarctic 155 Peninsula; ASPA No 153, Eastern Dallmann Bay, Antarctic 167 Peninsula; ASPA No 154, Botany Bay, Cape Geology, Victoria 180 Land; ASPA No 156, Lewis Bay, Mount Erebus, Ross Island, 193 Ross Sea; ASPA No 160, Frazier Islands, Wilkes Land; 201 ASPA No 161, Terra Nova Bay, Ross Sea. 221 Measure 3 (2003): Antarctic Protected Areas System: 240 Revised List of Historic Sites and Monuments Annex B: Decisions 256 Decision 1 (2003) Apportioning Contributions to the 257 Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty Decision 2 (2003) Provisional application of Measure 1 260 (2003) Decision 3 (2003) Staff Regulations for the Secretariat 264 of the Antarctic Treaty 2 Final Report of XXVI ATCM Decision 4 (2003) Financial Regulations for the 276 Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty Decision 5 (2003) Meeting of Experts on Tourism and 285 Non–Governmental Activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction the Models That Relate to Foraging Ecology; Namely Their Diet and At-Sea Distribution
    CCAMLR Science, Vol. 18 (2011): 75–114 A REVIEW OF THE DIET AND AT-SEA DISTRIBUTION OF PENGUINS BREEDING WITHIN THE CAMLR CONVENTION AREA N. Ratcliffe and P. Trathan British Antarctic Survey High Cross, Madingley Road Cambridge CB3 0ET United Kingdom Email – [email protected] Abstract Managing fisheries in an ecologically sensitive manner demands that catches do not depress stocks within the foraging areas used by predators to levels that reduce their reproductive success or survival. Spatially–explicit bioenergetics models that estimate the amount of prey consumed by predators are required to inform such policy. These models require information on the number of predators in a population, their nutritional demands, their diet composition and their seasonal distribution in the marine environment. This paper reviews all published information on the diet and at-sea distribution of the six penguin species that breed in the CAMLR Convention Area, the methods used to collect these data and the uncertainties inherent in them. The review will be of utility to modellers as a source of parameters, and to penguin biologists by providing comparative information for their own findings and by highlighting significant gaps in existing knowledge and methods that could be used to fill these. Introduction the models that relate to foraging ecology; namely their diet and at-sea distribution. Information of A key objective for CCAMLR is to estimate the distribution and size of penguin colonies and the biomass of different prey species consumed by predators, especially harvested species such as the energetic demands of penguins form the foci Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) within each of of other strands of Subgroup on Status and Trend the management subareas of the Southern Ocean.
    [Show full text]