DOCSLIB.ORG

Final Report of the XXVI ATCM

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Final Report of XXVI ATCM FINAL REPORT 16/07/2003 1 Final Report of XXVI ATCM CONTENTS SUBJECT PAGE Acronyms and Abbreviations 4 PART I: FINAL REPORT OF XXVI ATCM 6 Appendix 1: Procedure for the Appointment of the Executive 40 Secretary of the Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty Appendix 2: Indicative estimates of the costs of the Secretariat of 45 The Antarctic Treaty. Part II: MEASURES, DECISIONS AND RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED 48 AT XXVI ATCM Annex A: Measures 49 Measure 1 (2003) Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty 50 Measure 2 (2003) Antarctic protected area system: 62 management plans for antarctic specially protected areas. ASPA No 105, Beaufort Island, Ross Sea; 63 ASPA No 114, Northern Coronation Island, South 82 Orkney Islands; ASPA No 118, Cryptogam Ridge, Mt Melbourne, 95 North Victoria Land and summit of Mt Melbourne, North Victoria Land; ASPA No 135, North-East Bailey Peninsula, Budd 106 Coast, Wilkes Land ASPA No 143, Marine Plain, Mule Peninsula, Vestfold 134 Hills, Princess Elizabeth Land; ASPA No 152, Western Bransfield Strait, Antarctic 155 Peninsula; ASPA No 153, Eastern Dallmann Bay, Antarctic 167 Peninsula; ASPA No 154, Botany Bay, Cape Geology, Victoria 180 Land; ASPA No 156, Lewis Bay, Mount Erebus, Ross Island, 193 Ross Sea; ASPA No 160, Frazier Islands, Wilkes Land; 201 ASPA No 161, Terra Nova Bay, Ross Sea. 221 Measure 3 (2003): Antarctic Protected Areas System: 240 Revised List of Historic Sites and Monuments Annex B: Decisions 256 Decision 1 (2003) Apportioning Contributions to the 257 Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty Decision 2 (2003) Provisional application of Measure 1 260 (2003) Decision 3 (2003) Staff Regulations for the Secretariat 264 of the Antarctic Treaty 2 Final Report of XXVI ATCM Decision 4 (2003) Financial Regulations for the 276 Secretariat of the Antarctic Treaty Decision 5 (2003) Meeting of Experts on Tourism and 285 Non–Governmental Activities. Annex C: Resolutions 286 Resolution 1 (2003) 287 Resolution 2 (2003) Support of the ATCM for the 288 International Polar Year 2007/8 Resolution 3 (2003) Co-operation in Hydrographic 289 Survey and Charting of Antarctic Waters Resolution 4 (2003) Support for the Conservation of 291 Albatrosses and Petrels Part III: OPENING AND CLOSING ADDRESSES AND REPORTS 292 FROM XXVI ATCM Annex D: Opening and Closing Addresses 293 Annex E: Report of the Committee for Environmental Protection 301 (CEP V) Annex F: Reports under Recommendation XIII-2 (ATS 5a) 343 United States 344 Australia 356 United Kingdom 357 CCAMLR 361 SCAR 371 COMNAP 384 Annex G: Reports in relation to article III (2) (ATS 5b) 389 ASOC 390 IUCN 395 IAATO 405 IHO 424 PART IV: ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS FROM XXVI ATCM 431 Annex H: Letter of Commitment of the Argentine Republic to 432 apply provisionally the Headquarters Agreement Annex I: Message from the XXVI Consultative Meeting to Stations 434 in the Antarctic Annex J: List of documents from ATCM XXVI 436 Annex K: List of participants 451 Annex L: National Contact Points 459 Annex M: Preliminary Agenda for ATCM XXVII 463 3 Final Report of XXVI ATCM ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ASOC Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition ASMA Antarctic Specially Managed Areas ASPA Antarctic Specially Protected Areas ATS Antarctic Treaty System ATCM Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting CCAMLR Convention for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources CCAS Convention for the Conservation of Antarctic Seals CEE Comprehensive Environmental Evaluation CEP Committee for Environmental Protection COMNAP Council of Managers of National Antarctic Programmes EIA Environmental Impact Assessment IAATO International Association of Antarctic Tour Operators ICG Intersessional Contact Group ICSU International Council for Science IEE Initial Environmental Evaluation IHO International Hydrographical Organisation IMO International Maritime OrganiZation IOC Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission IP Information Paper IUCN World conservation Union SATCM Special Antarctic treaty Consultative Meeting SCAR Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research SPA Specially Protected Areas SSSI Site of Special Scientific Interest UNEP United Nations Environmental Programme 4 Final Report of XXVI ATCM WG Working Group WMO World Meteorological Organisation WP Working Paper WTO World Tourism Organisation WWF World Wildlife Fund 5 Final Report of XXVI ATCM PART I FINAL REPORT 6 Final Report of XXVI ATCM FINAL REPORT OF THE XXVI ANTARCTIC TREATY CONSULTATIVE MEETING MADRID, SPAIN, 9-20 JUNE, 2003. (1) Pursuant to article IX of the Antarctic Treaty, Representatives of the Consultative Parties (Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, Bulgaria, Chile, China, Ecuador, Finland, France, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Peru, Poland, the Russian Federation, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the United States of America and Uruguay) met in Madrid from 9-20 June, 2003, for the purpose of exchanging information, holding consultations, and considering and recommending to their governments measures in furtherance of the principles and objectives of the Treaty. (2) The Meeting was also attended by Delegations of the following Contracting Parties to the Antarctic Treaty which are not Consultative Parties: Austria, Canada, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Greece, Hungary, Romania, Slovakia, Switzerland and Ukraine. A representative of Malaysia was present by invitation of the XXVI ATCM to observe the Meeting. (3) In accordance with articles 2 and 30 of the Rules of Procedure (RP), Observers from the Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources (CCAMLR), the Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR), and the Council of Managers of National Antarctic Programs (COMNAP) attended the Meeting. (4) In accordance with article 38 of the RP, Experts from the following International Organizations and Non-Governmental Organizations attended the Meeting by the invitation of the XXV ATCM: The Antarctic and Southern Ocean Coalition (ASOC), the International Association of Antarctica Tourist Operators (IAATO), the International Hydrographic Organization (IHO), the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) and the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP). The Chairman of the Artic Council was also invited to attend the Meeting for the purpose of item 9 of the Agenda. (5) The information requirements of the Host Country towards the Contracting Parties, Observers and Experts were fulfilled by Secretariat Circular Notes, letters and through a website with an open as well as a password protected area. (6) Informal working meetings of the Heads of Delegations of the Consultative Parties were held in Madrid on 8 and 18 June. 7 Final Report of XXVI ATCM Item 1: Opening of the Meeting (7) In accordance with articles 5 and 6 of the RP, Ambassador Fernando de la Serna, Head of the Spanish Delegation, opened the Meeting and proposed Ambassador José Antonio de Yturriaga as Chairman of the XXVI ATCM, proposal which was accepted. The Chairman welcomed the delegations of Contracting Parties, Observers and Experts, and called for a minute of silence in memory of Mr. Esteban de Salas, former Secretary of CCAMLR, and Major José Ripollés, Head of the Spanish Base “Gabriel de Castilla” in 2001-2002, who had recently died. (8) The XXVI ATCM was officially inaugurated by the Prince of Asturias, HRH Don Felipe de Borbón. After some introductory words by the Chairman, Mrs. María Elvira Rodriguez Herrer, Spanish Minister for the Environment, welcomed the delegates to Madrid, recalled the previous Meeting in Madrid in 1991 when the Protocol on Environmental Protection was signed, and underlined the importance of the Antarctic for the global ecosystem. (9) HRH the Prince emphasized the special nature of the Antarctic Treaty System, a unique case of collective administration. HRH analyzed the political, scientific and environmental aspects of the Antarctic regime. HRH mentioned that SCAR had received the Principe de Asturias Prize for international cooperation. HRH also encouraged that an agreement be reached on the establishment of the Permanent Secretariat in Buenos Aires during the course of this XXVI ATCM. (10) The opening statements are included in this Report at Annex D. Item 2: Election of Officers. (11) Mr. Chris Badenhorst, Head of the Delegation of South Africa (Host Country of the XXVII ATCM) was elected Vice-Chairman, and Ambassador Luis García Cerezo was appointed Secretary of the Meeting. (12) Four Working Groups were established: Secretariat WG, Liability WG, Institutional Matters WG and Operational WG. It was agreed that the Institutional WG would deal with the issue of tourism and that an “ad hoc” Chairman would be chosen at a later stage to preside over the discussion on such issue. The following Chairmen of the WG were elected: i) Secretariat WG: Prof. Francesco Francioni of Italy. ii) Institutional Matters WG: Mr. Jan Huber of The Netherlands. iii) Operational Matters WG: Ambassador José Manuel Ovalle of Chile. iv) Liability WG: Ambassador Don MacKay of New Zealand v) Institutional Matters-Tourism WG: Mr. Michel Brumeaux. 8 Final Report of XXVI ATCM Item 3: Adoption of the Agenda (13) The following Agenda, included in document RCTA/SEC.1 was adopted: 1) Opening of the Meeting. 2) Election of Officers. 3) Adoption of the Agenda. 4) Operation of the Antarctic Treaty System: a) General matters b) Antarctic Treaty Secretariat 5) Operation of the Antarctic Treaty System:
Recommended publications
  • The Antarctic Treaty System And

    The Antarctic Treaty System And

    The Antarctic Treaty System and Law During the first half of the 20th century a series of territorial claims were made to parts of Antarctica, including New Zealand's claim to the Ross Dependency in 1923. These claims created significant international political tension over Antarctica which was compounded by military activities in the region by several nations during the Second World War. These tensions were eased by the International Geophysical Year (IGY) of 1957-58, the first substantial multi-national programme of scientific research in Antarctica. The IGY was pivotal not only in recognising the scientific value of Antarctica, but also in promoting co- operation among nations active in the region. The outstanding success of the IGY led to a series of negotiations to find a solution to the political disputes surrounding the continent. The outcome to these negotiations was the Antarctic Treaty. The Antarctic Treaty The Antarctic Treaty was signed in Washington on 1 December 1959 by the twelve nations that had been active during the IGY (Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Chile, France, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, South Africa, United Kingdom, United States and USSR). It entered into force on 23 June 1961. The Treaty, which applies to all land and ice-shelves south of 60° South latitude, is remarkably short for an international agreement – just 14 articles long. The twelve nations that adopted the Treaty in 1959 recognised that "it is in the interests of all mankind that Antarctica shall continue forever to be used exclusively for peaceful purposes and shall not become the scene or object of international discord".
  • Antarctic Peninsula

    Antarctic Peninsula

    Hucke-Gaete, R, Torres, D. & Vallejos, V. 1997c. Entanglement of Antarctic fur seals, Arctocephalus gazella, by marine debris at Cape Shirreff and San Telmo Islets, Livingston Island, Antarctica: 1998-1997. Serie Científica Instituto Antártico Chileno 47: 123-135. Hucke-Gaete, R., Osman, L.P., Moreno, C.A. & Torres, D. 2004. Examining natural population growth from near extinction: the case of the Antarctic fur seal at the South Shetlands, Antarctica. Polar Biology 27 (5): 304–311 Huckstadt, L., Costa, D. P., McDonald, B. I., Tremblay, Y., Crocker, D. E., Goebel, M. E. & Fedak, M. E. 2006. Habitat Selection and Foraging Behavior of Southern Elephant Seals in the Western Antarctic Peninsula. American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting 2006, abstract #OS33A-1684. INACH (Instituto Antártico Chileno) 2010. Chilean Antarctic Program of Scientific Research 2009-2010. Chilean Antarctic Institute Research Projects Department. Santiago, Chile. Kawaguchi, S., Nicol, S., Taki, K. & Naganobu, M. 2006. Fishing ground selection in the Antarctic krill fishery: Trends in patterns across years, seasons and nations. CCAMLR Science, 13: 117–141. Krause, D. J., Goebel, M. E., Marshall, G. J., & Abernathy, K. (2015). Novel foraging strategies observed in a growing leopard seal (Hydrurga leptonyx) population at Livingston Island, Antarctic Peninsula. Animal Biotelemetry, 3:24. Krause, D.J., Goebel, M.E., Marshall. G.J. & Abernathy, K. In Press. Summer diving and haul-out behavior of leopard seals (Hydrurga leptonyx) near mesopredator breeding colonies at Livingston Island, Antarctic Peninsula. Marine Mammal Science.Leppe, M., Fernandoy, F., Palma-Heldt, S. & Moisan, P 2004. Flora mesozoica en los depósitos morrénicos de cabo Shirreff, isla Livingston, Shetland del Sur, Península Antártica, in Actas del 10º Congreso Geológico Chileno.
  • THE POLAR RECORD Editor: L

    THE POLAR RECORD Editor: L

    THE POLAR RECORD Editor: L. M. Forbes. Editorial Committee: B. B. Roberts, G. de Q. Robin, Sir J. M. Wordie Vol. 9 January 1959 No. 61 CONTENTS The Scott Polar Research Institute page 297 ARTICLES : The Canadian Northern Insect Survey, 1947-57. By T. N. Freeman 299 Recent economic developments in northern Quebec and Labrador. By J. Brian Bird . 308 Iron ore in Arctic Europe. By P. A. B. Gethin .... 314 Geodetic survey of northern Canada by shoran trilateration. By Angus C. Hamilton 320 The manuscript collection of the Scott Polar Research Institute. By Ann Savours .......... 331 FIELD WORK: British expedition to Vestspitsbergen, 1956 . • . 336 French expedition to central Greenland, 1956-57 .... 336 British expedition to north-west Greenland, 1957 .... 336 Soviet Arctic expeditions, 1957 337 The Northern Sea Route in 1957 337 Swedish-Finnish-Swiss International Geophysical Year Expedition to Nordaustlandet, 1957-58; and Swedish Expedition to Nordaust- landet, 1958-59: Season 1957-58. ...... 338 Swedish Glaciological Expedition to Nordaustlandet, 1958 . 339 Under-ice crossing of the Arctic basin: U.S.S. Nautilus and U.S.S. Skate, 1958 340 . Arctic Institute Greenland Expedition, 1958 341 British naval hydrographic surveys in the Falkland Islands Depen- dencies, 1956-57 and 1957-58 '. 341 The Australian automatic weather station on Lewis Islet, Wilkes Land 342 Anglo-American physiological team in Ross Dependency, 1957-58 . 343 NOTES : Extension of International Geophysical Year activities into 1959 . 345 Norwegian-Soviet sealing agreement, 1958 ..... 845 Tenth meeting of the International Whaling Commission, 1958 . 349 New Soviet ice-strengthened ships 350 New geographical institute in Siberia 350 ig Pit 296 CONTENTS NOTES (cont.) Soviet organizations concerned with the Antarctic .
  • Species Status Assessment Emperor Penguin (Aptenodytes Fosteri)

    Species Status Assessment Emperor Penguin (Aptenodytes Fosteri)

    SPECIES STATUS ASSESSMENT EMPEROR PENGUIN (APTENODYTES FOSTERI) Emperor penguin chicks being socialized by male parents at Auster Rookery, 2008. Photo Credit: Gary Miller, Australian Antarctic Program. Version 1.0 December 2020 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Ecological Services Program Branch of Delisting and Foreign Species Falls Church, Virginia Acknowledgements: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Penguins are flightless birds that are highly adapted for the marine environment. The emperor penguin (Aptenodytes forsteri) is the tallest and heaviest of all living penguin species. Emperors are near the top of the Southern Ocean’s food chain and primarily consume Antarctic silverfish, Antarctic krill, and squid. They are excellent swimmers and can dive to great depths. The average life span of emperor penguin in the wild is 15 to 20 years. Emperor penguins currently breed at 61 colonies located around Antarctica, with the largest colonies in the Ross Sea and Weddell Sea. The total population size is estimated at approximately 270,000–280,000 breeding pairs or 625,000–650,000 total birds. Emperor penguin depends upon stable fast ice throughout their 8–9 month breeding season to complete the rearing of its single chick. They are the only warm-blooded Antarctic species that breeds during the austral winter and therefore uniquely adapted to its environment. Breeding colonies mainly occur on fast ice, close to the coast or closely offshore, and amongst closely packed grounded icebergs that prevent ice breaking out during the breeding season and provide shelter from the wind. Sea ice extent in the Southern Ocean has undergone considerable inter-annual variability over the last 40 years, although with much greater inter-annual variability in the five sectors than for the Southern Ocean as a whole.
  • Antarctic Treaty Handbook: Tourism

    Antarctic Treaty Handbook: Tourism

    TOURISM AND OTHER NON-GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES Introductory note Commercial tourism Until 1966 virtually all expeditions to the Antarctic had been organized by governments or had some measure of governmental backing. In that year there appeared in Antarctica for the first time a commercially organized, ship-borne tourist expedition. In subsequent years commercial tourism increased, using ships and aircraft. The area most frequently visited by sea was the Antarctic Peninsula. Regular airborne tourism began in 1977 and developed using long range passenger aircraft flying from Australia and New Zealand. Almost all of these flights overflew parts of Antarctica and returned home without landing. Airborne tourism diminished considerably following the tragic crash on Mount Erebus, Ross Island, on 28 November 1979 with the loss of 257 lives. Non-governmental non-tourist expeditions Such expeditions also began to appear in the Antarctic in 1966. The preparedness of such expeditions has varied; the consequent requests for assistance from governmental expeditions have sometimes caused disruption to scientific programs. A major aim of the consideration engendered by these expeditions within the Treaty fora has been to encourage such private expeditions to be adequately prepared and fully self-sufficient. Antarctic Treaty Recommendations XXI: Resolution 3 (1997) Standard Form for Advance Notification and Post-Visit Reporting on Tourism and Non-Governmental Activities in Antarctica The Representatives, Recalling Resolution 3 (1995) which agreed that there would be an advantage in standardized reporting of information on tourism and non-governmental activity in Antarctica; Noting that Attachment A to Recommendation 1 (1994) outlines the requirements for Advance Notice of tourism and non-governmental activities, and that Resolution 3 (1995) outlines requirements for post-activity reports; Recalling that Parties agreed at ATCM XX to trial a standard form for Advance Notification and Post-Visit Reporting during the 1996/97 Antarctic season.
  • Haswell Island (Haswell Island and Adjacent Emperor Penguin Rookery on Fast Ice)

    Haswell Island (Haswell Island and Adjacent Emperor Penguin Rookery on Fast Ice)

    Measure 5 (2016) Management Plan for Antarctic Specially Protected Area No. 127 Haswell Island (Haswell Island and Adjacent Emperor Penguin Rookery on Fast Ice) 1. Description of values to be protected The area includes Haswell Island with its littoral zone and adjacent fast ice when present. Haswell Island was discovered in 1912 by the Australian Antarctic Expedition led by D. Mawson. It was named after William Haswell, professor of biology who rendered assistance to the expedition. Haswell is the biggest island of the same-name archipelago, with a height of 93 meters and 0,82 sq.meters in area. The island is at 2,5 km distance from the Russian Mirny Station operational from 1956. At East and South-East of the island, there is a large colony of Emperor penguins (Aptenodytes forsteri) on fast ice. The Haswell Island is a unique breeding site for almost all breeding bird species in East Antarctica including the: Antarctic petrel (Talassoica antarctica), Antarctic fulmar (Fulmarus glacioloides), Cape petrel (Daption capense), Snow petrel (Pagodroma nivea), Wilson’s storm petrel (Oceanites oceanicus), South polar skua (Catharacta maccormicki), Lonnberg skua Catharacta antarctica lonnbergi and Adelie penguin (Pygoscelis adeliae). The Area supports five species of pinnipeds, including the Ross seal (Ommatophoca rossii) which falls in the protected species category. ATCM VIII (Oslo, 1975) approved its designation as SSSI 7 on the aforementioned grounds after a proposal by the USSR. Map 1 shows the location of the Haswell Islands (except Vkhodnoy Island), Mirny Station, and logistic activity sites. It was renamed and renumbered as ASPA No. 127 by Decision 1 (2002).
  • Management Plan for Antarctic Specially Protected Area No. 116 NEW COLLEGE VALLEY, CAUGHLEY BEACH, CAPE BIRD, ROSS ISLAND

    Management Plan for Antarctic Specially Protected Area No. 116 NEW COLLEGE VALLEY, CAUGHLEY BEACH, CAPE BIRD, ROSS ISLAND

    Management Plan For Antarctic Specially Protected Area No. 116 NEW COLLEGE VALLEY, CAUGHLEY BEACH, CAPE BIRD, ROSS ISLAND 1. Description of values to be protected In 1985, two areas at Cape Bird, Ross Island were designated as SSSI No. 10, Caughley Beach (Recommendation XIII-8 (1985)) and SPA No. 20, New College Valley (Recommendation XIII-12 (1985)), following proposals by New Zealand that these areas should be protected because they contained some of the richest stands of moss and associated microflora and fauna in the Ross Sea region of Antarctica. This is the only area on Ross Island where protection is specifically given to plant assemblages and associated ecosystems. At that time, SPA No. 20 was enclosed within SSSI No. 10, in order to provide more stringent access conditions to that part of the Area. In 2000, SSSI No. 10 was incorporated with SPA No. 20 by Measure 1 (2000), with the former area covered by SPA No. 20 becoming a Restricted Zone within the revised SPA No. 20. The boundaries of the Area were revised from the boundaries in the original recommendations, in view of improved mapping and to follow more closely the ridges enclosing the catchment of New College Valley. Caughley Beach itself was adjacent to, but never a part of, the original Area, and for this reason the entire Area was renamed as New College Valley, which was within both of the original sites. The Area was redesignated by Decision 1 (2002) as Antarctic Specially Protected Area (ASPA) No. 116 and a revised Management Plan was adopted through Measure 1 (2006).
  • Joint Conference of the History EG and Humanities and Social Sciences

    Joint Conference of the History EG and Humanities and Social Sciences

    Joint conference of the History EG and Humanities and Social Sciences EG "Antarctic Wilderness: Perspectives from History, the Humanities and the Social Sciences" Colorado State University, Fort Collins (USA), 20 - 23 May 2015 A joint conference of the History Expert Group and the Humanities and Social Sciences Expert Group on "Antarctic Wilderness: Perspectives from History, the Humanities and the Social Sciences" was held at Colorado State University in Fort Collins (USA) on 20-23 May 2015. On Wednesday (20 May) we started with an excursion to the Rocky Mountain National Park close to Estes. A hike of two hours took us along a former golf course that had been remodelled as a natural plain, and served as a fitting site for a discussion with park staff on “comparative wilderness” given the different connotations of that term in isolated Antarctica and comparatively accessible Colorado. After our return to Fort Collins we met a group of members of APECS (Association of Polar Early Career Scientists), with whom we had a tour through the New Belgium Brewery. The evening concluded with a screening of the film “Nightfall on Gaia” by the anthropologist Juan Francisco Salazar (Australia), which provides an insight into current social interactions on King George Island and connections to the natural and political complexities of the sixth continent. The conference itself was opened by on Thursday (21 May) by Diana Wall, head of the School of Global Environmental Sustainability at the Colorado State University (CSU). Andres Zarankin (Brazil) opened the first session on narratives and counter narratives from Antarctica with his talk on sealers, marginality, and official narratives in Antarctic history.
  • The Antarctic Treaty

    The Antarctic Treaty

    The Antarctic Treaty Measures adopted at the Thirty-ninth Consultative Meeting held at Santiago, Chile 23 May – 1 June 2016 Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs by Command of Her Majesty November 2017 Cm 9542 © Crown copyright 2017 This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain permission from the copyright holders concerned. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at Treaty Section, Foreign and Commonwealth Office, King Charles Street, London, SW1A 2AH ISBN 978-1-5286-0126-9 CCS1117441642 11/17 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum Printed in the UK by the APS Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majestyʼs Stationery Office MEASURES ADOPTED AT THE THIRTY-NINTH ANTARCTIC TREATY CONSULTATIVE MEETING Santiago, Chile 23 May – 1 June 2016 The Measures1 adopted at the Thirty-ninth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting are reproduced below from the Final Report of the Meeting. In accordance with Article IX, paragraph 4, of the Antarctic Treaty, the Measures adopted at Consultative Meetings become effective upon approval by all Contracting Parties whose representatives were entitled to participate in the meeting at which they were adopted (i.e. all the Consultative Parties). The full text of the Final Report of the Meeting, including the Decisions and Resolutions adopted at that Meeting and colour copies of the maps found in this command paper, is available on the website of the Antarctic Treaty Secretariat at www.ats.aq/documents.
  • Federal Register/Vol. 84, No. 78/Tuesday, April 23, 2019/Rules

    Federal Register/Vol. 84, No. 78/Tuesday, April 23, 2019/Rules

    Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 78 / Tuesday, April 23, 2019 / Rules and Regulations 16791 U.S.C. 3501 et seq., nor does it require Agricultural commodities, Pesticides SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The any special considerations under and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping Antarctic Conservation Act of 1978, as Executive Order 12898, entitled requirements. amended (‘‘ACA’’) (16 U.S.C. 2401, et ‘‘Federal Actions to Address Dated: April 12, 2019. seq.) implements the Protocol on Environmental Justice in Minority Environmental Protection to the Richard P. Keigwin, Jr., Populations and Low-Income Antarctic Treaty (‘‘the Protocol’’). Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16, Director, Office of Pesticide Programs. Annex V contains provisions for the 1994). Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is protection of specially designated areas Since tolerances and exemptions that amended as follows: specially managed areas and historic are established on the basis of a petition sites and monuments. Section 2405 of under FFDCA section 408(d), such as PART 180—[AMENDED] title 16 of the ACA directs the Director the tolerance exemption in this action, of the National Science Foundation to ■ do not require the issuance of a 1. The authority citation for part 180 issue such regulations as are necessary proposed rule, the requirements of the continues to read as follows: and appropriate to implement Annex V Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371. to the Protocol. et seq.) do not apply. ■ 2. Add § 180.1365 to subpart D to read The Antarctic Treaty Parties, which This action directly regulates growers, as follows: includes the United States, periodically food processors, food handlers, and food adopt measures to establish, consolidate retailers, not States or tribes.
  • Management Plan for Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 135 NORTH-EAST BAILEY PENINSULA, BUDD COAST, WILKES LAND

    Management Plan for Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 135 NORTH-EAST BAILEY PENINSULA, BUDD COAST, WILKES LAND

    Management Plan for Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 135 NORTH-EAST BAILEY PENINSULA, BUDD COAST, WILKES LAND Introduction North-East Bailey Peninsula (66°16’59.9"S, 110°31’59.9"E) is located approximately 200m east of Australia’s Casey station, in the Windmill Islands region of the Budd Coast, Wilkes Land, East Antarctica. It was designated as Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) No 16 under Recommendation XIII-8 (1985), after a proposal by Australia. In accordance with Decision 1 (2002) the site was redesignated and renumbered as Antarctic Specially Protected Area (ASPA) No 135. Revised management plans for the Area were adopted under Measure 2 (2003) and Measure 8 (2008). The ASPA is designated primarily as a scientific reference site which, since the early 1980s, has supported a range of studies into the diverse assemblage of vegetation found in the area. The close proximity of the Area to Casey station allows ease of access for field research but also creates the potential for disturbance of study areas. 1. Description of values to be protected The North-east Bailey Peninsula Antarctic Specially Protected Area (the Area) is representative of a diverse assemblage of the Windmill Islands region flora. As such, the Area has intrinsic ecological value and scientific importance, particularly to botanists, microbiologists, soil scientists and glacial geomorphologists. The Area contains three extensive and contrasting moss fields that have been the subject of taxonomic, ecological and physiological studies since the summer of 1982/83. Additional studies have included population ecology of invertebrates associated with the vegetation, and soil/water chemistry.
  • ~©L%~Bulletin No

    ~©L%~Bulletin No

    The International Council for Science ~©L%~bulletin No. 150 July 2003 Measures, Decisions and Resolutions adopted at the Twenty-fifth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting Warsaw, Poland, 10-20 September 2002 p 1 = Published by the SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON ANTARCTIC RESEARCH at the Scott Polar Research Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom THE INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR SCIENCE SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON ANTARCTIC RESEARCH SCAR BULLETIN No 150, July 2003 Twenty-fifth Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting Warsaw, Poland, 10-20 September 2002 Decisions, Resolutions and Measures MEASURE 1 (2002) Antarctic Protected Area System: Management Plans Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 124, Cape for Antarctic Specially Protected Areas Crozier, Ross Island; The Representatives, Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 126, Byers Recalling Resolution 1 (1998) allocating responsibility Peninsula, Livingston Island; among Consultative Parties for the revision of Management Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 130, "Tram­ Plans for Protected areas; way Ridge", Mount Erebus, Ross Island; Noting that the draft Management Plans appended to this • Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 137, North­ Measure have been endorsed by the Committee for west White Island, McMurdo Sound; Environmentqal Protection and the Scientific Committee • Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 147, Abla­ on Antarctic Research (SCAR); tion Point - Ganymede Heights; Recognizing that these Areas support outstanding natural Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 148, Mount features and biota of scientific interest; Flora, Hope Bay; Recommend to their Governments the following Measure Antarctic Specially Protected Area No 157, Back­ for approval in accordance with paragraph 1 of Article 6 of door Bay, Cape Royds, Ross Island. Annex V to the Protocol on Environmental Protection to and which are annexed to this Measure, be adopted.