DOCSLIB.ORG

FASP Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FASP Project APACHE NORTH SEA LIMITED SUBSEA UK EXPRO OPEN PLENARY MARK RICHARDSON APACHE NORTH SEA PROJECTS GROUP MANAGER 11TH FEBRUARY 2015 FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS Certain statements in this presentation may contain "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 including, without limitation, expectations, beliefs, plans and objectives regarding production and exploration activities. Any matters that are not historical facts are forward-looking and, accordingly, involve estimates, assumptions, risks and uncertainties, including, without limitation, risks, uncertainties and other factors discussed in our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K, recent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, recent Current Reports on Form 8-K available on our website, http://www.apachecorp.com/, and in our other public filings and press releases. These forward-looking statements are based on Apache Corporation’s (Apache) current expectations, estimates and projections about the company, its industry, its management’s beliefs and certain assumptions made by management. No assurance can be given that such expectations, estimates or projections will prove to have been correct. Whenever possible, these “forward-looking statements” are identified by words such as “expects,” “believes,” “anticipates” and similar phrases. Because such statements involve risks and uncertainties, Apache’s actual results and performance may differ materially from the results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. Unless legally required, we assume no duty to update these statements as of any future date. However, you should review carefully reports and documents that Apache files periodically with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Cautionary Note to Investors: The United States Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") permits oil and gas companies, in their filings with the SEC, to disclose only proved, probable, and possible reserves that meet the SEC's definitions for such terms. Apache uses certain terms in this presentation, such as “BO resource,” “BO Potential” and other similar terms that the SEC guidelines strictly prohibit Apache from including in filings with the SEC. “BO Resource,” “BO Potential” and other such terms do not take into account the certainty of resource recovery, which is contingent on exploration success, technical improvements in drilling access, commerciality and other factors, and are therefore not indicative of expected future resource recovery and should not be relied upon. Investors are urged to consider carefully the disclosure in Apache’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, and amendments thereto, available from Apache at www.apachecorp.com or by writing Apache at: 2000 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 100, Houston, Texas 77056 (Attn: Corporate Secretary). You can also obtain this report from the SEC by calling 1-800-SEC-0330 or from the SEC's website at www.sec.gov 2 APACHE NORTH SEA 3 Improvement Prohibition SAFETY PERFORMANCE Company Notices Notices Talisman Sinopec Energy UK Limited 12 1 CNR International (U.K.) Limited 11 2 BHP Billiton Petroleum Limited 10 Maersk 8 2 Shell U.K. Limited 7 6 Marathon Oil U.K. LLC 7 Nexen Petroleum U.K. Limited 5 Petrofac Facilities Management Limited 5 TAQA Bratani Limited 4 Total E&P UK Limited 4 Teekay Petrojarl Production AS 3 1 Eni Liverpool Bay Operating Company Limited 3 Bluewater Services UK Limited 2 Perenco UK Limited 2 Premier Oil ONS Limited 2 Star Energy Oil & Gas Limited 2 Ugland Stena Storage AS 2 ConocoPhillips (UK) Limited 1 1 Amec Group Limited 1 Apache North Sea Limited 1 BG International Limited 1 BP Exploration Operating Company Limited 1 Centrica Storage Limited 1 Chevron North Sea Limited 1 E.ON E&P UK Ltd 1 Enquest Plc 1 Hydrocarbon Resources Limited 1 North Sea Production Company Limited 1 Wood Group Engineering (North Sea) Limited 1 Sources: OGUK Benchmarking 2013 Data and HSE http://www.hse.gov.uk/notices/notices 2013 PRODUCTION MBOE/D 3,000 Forties 140 120 2,500 100 80 2,000 60 40 1,500 Gas 20 Oil Beryl Area 1,000 0 Nelson 500 Scott Nevis S Telford Buckland Ness Maclure Bacchus 0 5 2013 PRODUCTION EFFICIENCY 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% APACHE MARATHON TULLOW PERENCO BHP CENTRICA ENQUEST BRIDGE NEXEN DANA COP TAQA RWE BG CHEVRON 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 ITHACA 1 PREMIER 3 SHELL TOTAL 5 BP 7 TALISMAN MAERSK 9 CNR E.ON 11 Operator Ranking Operator 13 15 17 6 Source: OGUK Production Efficiency Task Force Data Pack 19 PROJECT PERFORMANCE FASP $54,865/Tonne FASP 4.8% £2,000,000 Non-Deepwater Subsea Tiebacks AFE APPROVED Cost per Well (subsea only projects) Eng, Mat, Inst PROJECT TOTAL 120,000,000 FORECAST v AFE Some points on this chart may be obscured £1,500,000 by others with near-identical values. Linear (PROJECT TOTAL) Outlier with y > 120,000,000 is not shown. Linear (FORECAST v AFE) 100,000,000 £1,000,000 Aviat $32m per Slot 80,000,000 y = 102,948,194x-0.4120 £500,000 R² = 0.5327 60,000,000 £0 40,000,000 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 33 35 37 39 41 43 45 47 -£500,000 20,000,000 Cost per Maximum Number of of Maximum Wellper NumberConnections (USD)Cost Bacchus $22m per Slot 0 -£1,000,000 0 5 10 15 20 25 Maximum Number of Well Connections North Sea Asia/Australia Africa ss_only Precision Range +/- ss_only Trend 7 AVIAT FUEL GAS TIE-BACK Facilities 23km 8” CS API X65 Pipeline 6” Flexible Riser on Forties Alpha 23km Services Umbilical Pipeline & Umbilical Rock Dumped 4-slot Manifold & SSIV Structures 2-off Subsea Trees Tie-in Spools & Jumpers Design 179.3barg MAOP & Sour Service 15 year design life New 500m Safety Zone at Aviat BERYL SUBSEA DEVELOPMENT DRILLING Ocean Patriot FNT L4N L4S BG2 NTP 9 EXPLORATION AND APPRIASAL DEVELOPMENTS NNS K Prospect - Tie-back Beryl Tertiary - Tie-back/FPSO Cassini - Tie-back Brora - Tie-back CNS Vail & Val d’Isere - Tie-back OTHERS Seagull - Non-Op Isabella - Tie-back 10 Wil Phoenix AREAS OF IMPACT AND INFLUENCE High Fiscal Policy Contractor Culture Regulatory Operator Regime Culture Operator Collaboration Production Med Efficiency Technology Industry Impact Industry Low Low Med High Operator Influence 11 CONTRACTOR CULTURE - REQUIREMENT Retrofit Subsea Choke Valve Installation Required in December Valve Lead Time 22 Weeks 12 CONTRACTOR CULTURE – TRADITIONAL THINKING Proposal 7m x 7m Over Trawlable Structure Planned Delivery February (8 weeks after required date) Required Sea State >1.2m Metrology Spool Required Engineering Costs: £115k, Fabrication Estimated Cost: £485k 13 CONTRACTOR CULTURE – NEW APPROACH Fit For Purpose Delivered December Required Sea State >3.0m Metrology Spool Not Required Engineering Costs: £30k, Fabrication Cost: £50k 14 OPERATOR CULTURE Present Culture Risk Averse Process Driven Insufficient Leverage of Human Capital Lack of Collaboration Function Constrained New Requirement Leadership Sense of Urgency Devolved Decision Making Responsibility, Accountability and Authority Best Answers Win Respect, Integrity and Trust 15 16 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM of the STATE of ILLINOIS 2815 West Washington Street I P.O
    Teachers’ Retirement System of the State of Illinois Compliance Examination For the Year Ended June 30, 2020 Performed as Special Assistant Auditors for the Auditor General, State of Illinois Teachers’ Retirement System of the State of Illinois Compliance Examination For the Year Ended June 30, 2020 Table of Contents Schedule Page(s) System Officials 1 Management Assertion Letter 2 Compliance Report Summary 3 Independent Accountant’s Report on State Compliance, on Internal Control over Compliance, and on Supplementary Information for State Compliance Purposes 4 Independent Auditors’ Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards 8 Schedule of Findings Current Findings – State Compliance 10 Supplementary Information for State Compliance Purposes Fiscal Schedules and Analysis Schedule of Appropriations, Expenditures and Lapsed Balances 1 13 Comparative Schedules of Net Appropriations, Expenditures and Lapsed Balances 2 15 Comparative Schedule of Revenues and Expenses 3 17 Schedule of Administrative Expenses 4 18 Schedule of Changes in Property and Equipment 5 19 Schedule of Investment Portfolio 6 20 Schedule of Investment Manager and Custodian Fees 7 21 Analysis of Operations (Unaudited) Analysis of Operations (Functions and Planning) 30 Progress in Funding the System 34 Analysis of Significant Variations in Revenues and Expenses 36 Analysis of Significant Variations in Administrative Expenses 37 Analysis
    [Show full text]
  • BHP Economic Contribution Report 2017 1 Chief Financial Officer’S Introduction
    Economic Contribution Report 2017 We have a long-standing commitment to transparency. We are proud of the value we generate and how this contributes to building trust with the communities in which we operate. In this Report Chief Financial Officer’s Introduction 2 Tax and our 2017 Financial Statements 20 FY2017 Total economic contribution 3 Basis of Report preparation 21 Our contribution throughout the value chain 6 Glossary 22 Approach to transparency and tax 9 Independent auditor’s report to the Directors Our payments to governments 14 of BHP Billiton Plc and BHP Billiton Limited 23 Corporate Directory 24 BHP Billiton Limited. ABN 49 004 028 077. Registered in Australia. Registered office: 171 Collins Street, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia. BHP Billiton Plc. Registration number 3196209. Registered in England and Wales. Registered office: Nova South, 160 Victoria Street London SW1E 5LB United Kingdom. Each of BHP Billiton Limited and BHP Billiton Plc is a member of the Group, which has its headquarters in Australia. BHP is a Dual Listed Company structure comprising BHP Billiton Limited and BHP Billiton Plc. The two entities continue to exist as separate companies but operate as a combined Group known as BHP. The headquarters of BHP Billiton Limited and the global headquarters of the combined Group are located in Melbourne, Australia. The headquarters of BHP Billiton Plc are located in London, United Kingdom. Both companies have identical Boards of Directors and are run by a unified management team. Throughout this publication, the Boards are referred to collectively as the Board. Shareholders in each company have equivalent economic and voting rights in the Group as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Empirical Inference of Related Trading Between Two Securities: Detecting Pairs Trading, Merger Arbitrage, and Strategy Rules*
    Empirical inference of related trading between two securities: Detecting pairs trading, merger arbitrage, and strategy rules* Keith Godfrey The University of Western Australia Working paper: 5 September 2013 The traditional approach to studying pairs trading is to simulate profitability using ex-post historical prices. I study the actual trades reported anonymously in security pairs and build statistical inferences of related trading. The approach is based on the time differences between trades. It can distinguish intrinsically related securities from pseudo-random sets, find stocks involved in merger arbitrage in massive sets of paired index constituents, and infer dominant trading rules of mean reversion algorithms. Empirical inference of related trading can enable further studies into pairs trading, strategy rules, merger arbitrage, and insider trading. Keywords: Inferred trading, empirical inference, pairs trading, merger arbitrage. JEL Classification Codes: G00, G10, C10, C40, C60 The availability of intraday trading or “tick” data with time resolution of a millisecond or finer is opening many avenues of research into financial markets. Analysis of two or more streams of tick data concurrently is becoming increasingly important in the study of multiple-security trading including index tracking, pairs trading, merger arbitrage, and market-neutral strategies. One of the greatest challenges in empirical trading research is the anonymity of reported trades. Securities exchanges report the dates, times, prices, and volumes traded, without identifying the traders. In studies of a single security, this introduces uncertainty of whether each market order that caused a trade was the buy or sell order, and there are documented approaches of inference such as Lee and Ready (1991).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8: Colombia
    8 Colombia 8.1 Summary of Coal Industry 8.1.1 ROLE OF COAL IN COLOMBIA Coal accounted for eight percent of Colombia’s energy consumption in 2007 and one-fourth of total exports in terms of revenue in 2009 (EIA, 2010a). As the world’s tenth largest producer and fourth largest exporter of coal (World Coal, 2012; Reuters, 2014), Colombia provides 6.9 percent of the world’s coal exports (EIA, 2010b). It exports 97 percent of its domestically produced coal, primarily to the United States, the European Union, and Latin America (EIA, 2010a). Colombia had 6,746 million tonnes (Mmt) of proven recoverable coal reserves in 2013, consisting mainly of high-quality bituminous coal and a small amount of metallurgical coal (Table 8-1). The country has the second largest coal reserves in South America, behind Brazil, with most of those reserves concentrated in the Guajira peninsula in the north (on the country’s Caribbean coast) and the Andean foothills (EIA, 2010a). Its reserves of high-quality bituminous coal are the largest in Latin America (BP, 2014). Table 8-1. Colombia’s Coal Reserves and Production – 2013 Anthracite & Sub-bituminous & Total Global Indicator Bituminous Lignite (million Rank (million tonnes) (million tonnes) tonnes) (# and %) Estimated Proved Coal 6,746.0 0.0 67469.0 11 (0.8%) Reserves (2013) Annual Coal Production 85.5 0.0 85.5 10 (1.4%) (2013) Source: BP (2014) Coal production for export occurs mainly in the northern states of Guajira (Cerrejón deposit), Cesar, and Cordoba. There are widespread small and medium-size coal producers in Norte de Santander (metallurgical coal), Cordoba, Santander, Antioquia, Cundinamarca, Boyaca, Valle del Cauca, Cauca, Borde Llanero, and Llanura Amazónica (MB, 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Oil and Gas Europe
    Oil and Gas Europe Buyer Members Powered by Achilles JQS and FPAL, Oil and Gas Europe brings together two communities to provide buyers with a regional, searchable network of qualified suppliers within the European oil and gas supply chain. Below is a list of the buyers from Achilles JQS and FPAL with access to the Oil and Gas Europe Network. Company Name 4c Solutions AS BUMI ARMADA UK LTD Emerson Process Management AS 4Subsea BW Offshore Norway Endur FABRICOM AS A.S Nymo BW Offshore UK ENI UK Abyss Subsea AS Cairn Energy Plc Norway Enquest Advokatfirmaet Simonsen Vogt Wiig AS Cairn Energy UK Equinor (U.K) Ltd Advokatfirmaet Thommessen AS CAN Offshore ESSAR OIL (UK) Ltd Af Gruppen Norge AS Cape Industrial Services Ltd Evry AGR Well Management Limited Chevron North Sea Limited Expro Group Aibel AS Chrysaor Holdings Limited Fairfield Energy Ltd Aker Solutions Norway CNOOC Faroe Petroleum Aker Solutions UK CNR International (UK) Ltd Furmanite AS. Alpha Petroleum Resources Limited ConocoPhillips (U.K.) Ltd Gassco Altus Intervention AS Cosl Drilling Europe AS Glencore Apache North Sea Limited Cuadrilla Resources Ltd GLT-PLUS VOF Apply Sørco AS Dana Petroleum (UK) Gulf Marine Services Halliburton Manufacturing & Archer Norge AS Dea Norge Services Ltd Awilco Drilling Deepocean AS Halliburton Norway Baker Hughes Norway Deepwell Hammertech AS DEO Petroleum Plc Baker Hughes UK (Parkmead Group) Hess Beerenberg Corp Dof Subsea Norway AS Ikm Group Bluewater Services DOF Subsea UK Ltd Ineos Denmark BP Exploration Operating International Recarch Institute Of Company Ltd Dwellop AS Stavanger IRIS Achilles Information Limited | 7 Burnbank Business Centre Souterhead Road Altens Aberdeen AB12 3LF | www.achilles.com Achilles Information Limited | FirstPoint Supplybase - Supplier Pre-Qualification Terms and Conditions Version 2.0 0718 © Achilles Supplybase Pty Ltd 2011 Inventura AS Oranje Nassau Energy UK Ltd Spirit Energy Nederland IV Oil and Gas b.v.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Review and Summary Financial Statements 2010 Shareholder Information Continued
    Centrica plc Registered office: Millstream, Maidenhead Road, Windsor, Berkshire SL4 5GD Company registered in England and Wales No. 3033654 www.centrica.com Annual Review and Summary Financial Statements 2010 Shareholder Information continued SHAREHOLDER SERVICES Centrica shareholder helpline To register for this service, please call the shareholder helpline on 0871 384 2985* to request Centrica’s shareholder register is maintained by Equiniti, a direct dividend payment form or download it from which is responsible for making dividend payments and www.centrica.com/shareholders. 01 10 updating the register. OVERVIEW SUMMARY OF OUR BUSINESS The Centrica FlexiShare service PERFORMANCE If you have any query relating to your Centrica shareholding, 01 Chairman’s Statement please contact our Registrar, Equiniti: FlexiShare is a ‘corporate nominee’, sponsored by Centrica and administered by Equiniti Financial Services Limited. It is 02 Our Performance 10 Operating Review Telephone: 0871 384 2985* a convenient way to manage your Centrica shares without 04 Chief Executive’s Review 22 Corporate Responsibility Review Textphone: 0871 384 2255* the need for a share certificate. Your share account details Write to: Equiniti, Aspect House, Spencer Road, Lancing, will be held on a separate register and you will receive an West Sussex BN99 6DA, United Kingdom annual confirmation statement. Email: [email protected] By transferring your shares into FlexiShare you will benefit from: A range of frequently asked shareholder questions is also available at www.centrica.com/shareholders. • low-cost share-dealing facilities provided by a panel of independent share dealing providers; Direct dividend payments • quicker settlement periods; Make your life easier by having your dividends paid directly into your designated bank or building society account on • no share certificates to lose; and the dividend payment date.
    [Show full text]
  • Extracting the Best in Upstream Analysis |
    Extracting the best in upstream analysis | www.worldexpro.com Extracting the best in upstream analysis | www.worldexpro.com Extracting the best in upstream analysis | www.worldexpro.com Why is World Expro essential reading? As oil prices continue to remain volatile and consuming nations become increasingly determined to secure access to energy supplies, choosing the right investment and the right business partner has never been more essential. Investing in new technologies to further push the boundaries of oil and gas exploration and production is becoming more and more crucial to companies to boost reserves and output. World Expro is the premier information source for the world’s upstream oil executives who need reliable and accurate intelligence to help them make critical business decisions. Aimed at senior board members, operations, procurement and E&P heads within the upstream industry World Expro provides a clear overview of the latest industry thinking regarding the key stages of exploration and production. Bonus distribution at key industry events, Further distribution of WEX on display at WEX on display at ADIPEC Abu Dhabi OSEA, Singapore Extracting the best in upstream analysis | www.worldexpro.com Circulation and Readership The key to World Expro’s success is its carefully targeted ABC-audited circulation. World Expro reaches key decision makers within state-owned and independent oil and gas producing companies, the contractor community and financial and consulting organisations. World Expro is read by personnel ranging from presidents and CEOs to heads of E&P, project managers and geophysicists to engineers. World Expro is distributed in March and September internationally at corporate, divisional/ regional and project level and has an estimated readership of 56,000 (publisher’s statement).
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Impacts of the Gulf of Mexico Oil and Natural Gas Industry
    The Economic Impacts of the Gulf of Mexico Oil and Natural Gas Industry Prepared For Prepared By Executive Summary Introduction Despite the current difficulties facing the global economy as a whole and the oil and natural gas industry specifically, the Gulf of Mexico oil and natural gas industry will likely continue to be a major source of energy production, employment, gross domestic product, and government revenues for the United States. Several proposals have been advanced recently which would have a major impact on the industry’s activity levels, and the economic activity supported by the Gulf of Mexico offshore oil and natural gas industry. The proposals vary widely, but for the purpose of this report three scenarios were developed, a scenario based on a continuation of current policies and regulations, a scenario examining the potential impacts of a ban on new offshore leases, and a scenario examining the potential impacts of a ban on new drilling permits approvals in the Gulf of Mexico. Energy and Industrial Advisory Partners (EIAP) was commissioned by the National Ocean Industry Association (NOIA) to develop a report forecasting activity levels, spending, oil and natural gas production, supported employment, GDP, and Government Revenues in these scenarios. The scenarios developed in this report are based solely upon government and other publicly available data and EIAP’s own expertise and analysis. The study also included profiles of NOIA members to demonstrate the diverse group of companies which make up the offshore Gulf of Mexico oil and natural gas industry as well as a list of over 2,400 suppliers to the industry representing all 50 states.
    [Show full text]
  • Jacobs MCM- Quantitative Cost Analysis and Business Case Of
    Radi oacti ve Waste S tor age and Dispos al F acilities in S out h A ustr alia – Quantit ati ve C ost A nal ysis and Business C as e Radioactive Waste Storage and Disposal Facilities in South Australia – Quantitative Cost Analysis and Business Case Radioactive Waste Storage and Disposal Facilities in South Australia – Quantitative Cost Analysis and Business Case Project no: IW104700 Document title: Radioactive Waste Storage and Disposal Facilities in South Australia – Quantitative Cost Analysis and Business Case Revision: Draft Report V1 Date: 09 February 2016 Client name: South Australian Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission Client no: Jacobs Report (0.4) Project manager: Tim Johnson Authors: Darron Cook, Charles McCombie, Neil Chapman, Nigel Sullivan, Rohan Zauner, Tim Johnson File name: J:\IE\Projects\03_Southern\IW104700\21 Deliverables\Reformatted Docs for Client Release\09022016 Combined Papers V1.0.docx Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty Limited ABN 37 001 024 095 Floor 11, 452 Flinders Street Melbourne VIC 3000 PO Box 312, Flinders Lane Melbourne VIC 8009 Australia T +61 3 8668 3000 F +61 3 8668 3001 www.jacobs.com COPYRIGHT: The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Jacobs Group (Australia) Pty Limited. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part without the written permission of Jacobs constitutes an infringement of copyright. Document history and status Revision Date Description By Review Approved V0 19 Jan 2016 For Client review Darron Darron Cook Darron Cook, team Cook V1 9 February For public consultation Tim Johnson Darron Cook Darron Cook IW104700 i Radioactive Waste Storage and Disposal Facilities in South Australia – Quantitative Cost Analysis and Business Case Contents Executive Summary ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Negativliste. Fossil Energi
    Bilag 6. Negativliste. Fossil energi Maj 2017 Læsevejledning til negativlisten: Moderselskab / øverste ejer vises med fed skrift til venstre. Med almindelig tekst, indrykket, er de underliggende selskaber, der udsteder aktier og erhvervsobligationer. Det er de underliggende, udstedende selskaber, der er omfattet af negativlisten. Rækkeetiketter Acergy SA SUBSEA 7 Inc Subsea 7 SA Adani Enterprises Ltd Adani Enterprises Ltd Adani Power Ltd Adani Power Ltd Adaro Energy Tbk PT Adaro Energy Tbk PT Adaro Indonesia PT Alam Tri Abadi PT Advantage Oil & Gas Ltd Advantage Oil & Gas Ltd Africa Oil Corp Africa Oil Corp Alpha Natural Resources Inc Alex Energy Inc Alliance Coal Corp Alpha Appalachia Holdings Inc Alpha Appalachia Services Inc Alpha Natural Resource Inc/Old Alpha Natural Resources Inc Alpha Natural Resources LLC Alpha Natural Resources LLC / Alpha Natural Resources Capital Corp Alpha NR Holding Inc Aracoma Coal Co Inc AT Massey Coal Co Inc Bandmill Coal Corp Bandytown Coal Co Belfry Coal Corp Belle Coal Co Inc Ben Creek Coal Co Big Bear Mining Co Big Laurel Mining Corp Black King Mine Development Co Black Mountain Resources LLC Bluff Spur Coal Corp Boone Energy Co Bull Mountain Mining Corp Central Penn Energy Co Inc Central West Virginia Energy Co Clear Fork Coal Co CoalSolv LLC Cobra Natural Resources LLC Crystal Fuels Co Cumberland Resources Corp Dehue Coal Co Delbarton Mining Co Douglas Pocahontas Coal Corp Duchess Coal Co Duncan Fork Coal Co Eagle Energy Inc/US Elk Run Coal Co Inc Exeter Coal Corp Foglesong Energy Co Foundation Coal
    [Show full text]
  • BHP Billiton Iron Ore Management Approach
    BHP Billiton Iron Ore Orebody 32 East AWT – Environmental Referral Document BHP Billiton Iron Ore management approach 1.1 Environmental management overview BHP Billiton has developed a Company Charter and Sustainable Development Policy for its operations. The Company Charter and Sustainable Development Policy (BHP Billiton Iron Ore, 2013a) are guiding resources for maintaining an emphasis on health, safety, environment and community and clarifying a broader commitment to aspects of sustainability including biodiversity, human rights, ethical business practices and economic contributions at all BHP Billiton sites. To interpret and support the Company Charter and BHP Billiton Iron Ore’s Sustainable Development Policy, BHP Billiton Iron Ore has developed an Environmental Governance Hierarchy, an Environmental Management System and is currently developing a series of Regional Management Strategies. 1.2 Environment Governance Hierarchy BHP Billiton Iron Ore now operates under an Environmental Governance Hierarchy (Figure 1). The Environment Governance Hierarchy provides the processes and practices that enable BHP Billiton Iron Ore to achieve its environmental objectives, reduce its environmental impacts and increase its operating efficiency. It enables environmental legal compliance to be undertaken and audited and provides for continual improvement in environmental performance. Figure 1: BHP Billiton Iron Ore Environmental Governance Hierarchy As shown in Figure 1, BHP Billiton Iron Ore’s environment governance hierarchy is broadly comprised of three tiers, representative of BHP Billiton Iron Ore’s different levels of management – BHP Billiton (corporate level), BHP Billiton Iron Ore (Business Unit level) and site specific (operations level) – and reflective of BHP Billiton’s top-down approach to environmental management across the Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore References
    Past, Ongoing and Future Projects OFFSHORE Date Contractor Project Number of Welding Stations (vessel if offshore) Country Pipelines welded Operator 2020 COOEC Lingshui 17-2-SCR 6 Saturnax stations (HYS201) China 404 welds 6.625" (18.3 mm) for CNOOC - 2.93 km of SRC lines - 2.00 km of flowline 2020 TechnipFMC Nam Con Son 2 & SVDN 4 Saturnax stations (G1200) Vietnam Nam Con Son 2: for PetroVietnam (PV GAS) 89 km 26" (1.1 mm) SVDN: 22 km 26" (19.1 mm) 1 km 26" (23.8 mm) 22 km 18" (15.9 mm) 1 km 18" (17.5 mm) Total : 11,053 welds 2020 Sapura Offshore Pegaga Dev. Project 2 Saturnax stations (S3000) Malaysia 324 welds 38" (22.2 mm, X65) - 4 km for Sarawak Shell Berhad 2020 Thien Nam Offshore Services Nam Con Son 2 3 Saturnax stations (Tos Ha Long) Vietnam Total of 2,542 welds: for PetroVietnam 29.7 km 26" (19.1 mm) 0.8 km 26" (23.8 mm) 2020 Sapura Offshore Merakes 4 Saturnax stations (S1200) Indonesia Deepwater lines : for ENI Sepinggan 2,685 welds 18" (26.7 mm, X65) - 32.74 km 2,688 welds 18" (26.7 mm, X65) - 32.78 km Shallow water lines : 1,083 welds 18" (26.7 mm, X65) - 13.22 km 1,074 welds 18" (26.7 mm, X65) - 13.11 km 2020 Sapura Energy ENI Amoca 2 4 Saturnax stations (Sapura 3500) Mexico Total of 3,377 welds: for ENI 10.75" (14.33 mm, X60) 12.75" (20.6 mm, X60) 14" (15.9 mm, X60) Sweet service 2020 GSP Offshore Midia 1 Saturnax stations (Bigfoot 1) Romania 9,970 welds 16" (11.9/12.7/14.3 mm, X52) for Black Sea Oil & Gas 1,463 welds 8.625" (12.7 mm, X52) 2020 Sapura Energy Kirinskoye 1 Saturnax + 2 manual stations (Sapura 1200) Russie
    [Show full text]