DOCSLIB.ORG

Water Resource Summary: Town of Germantown

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Water Resource Summary: Town of Germantown Water Resource Summary December 2013 A Summary Prepared for the Town of Germantown This summary provides information for land-use planning and decision-making as requested by the Town of Germantown. It identifies many of the most critical aspects and locations of the town’s water resources. The summary is based on information available to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) and the New York State Water Resources Institute at Cornell University. It was gleaned from various complementary, but not necessarily comprehensive, sources and should not be considered a complete inventory. Central to the information in this document is the concept of watersheds. A watershed is the area of land from which water drains into a stream, river, lake or other waterbody. Precipitation flows over and through the landscape into intermittent streams, kills, creeks, rivers, aquifers, wetlands and floodplains of the Hudson Valley to form the watersheds of the Hudson River estuary, providing many necessities and vital benefits to human communities. When these water resources are working with functioning and healthy ecosystems, they deliver clean drinking water, filter pollutants, comprise habitat for plants and animals, absorb floodwaters, and provide numerous recreation opportunities. Local municipalities play a critical role in restoring and maintaining the waters of the Hudson Valley for future generations. To do this, they must consider impacts to water resources during the local decision-making process. To further support land-use and conservation planning efforts in the Town of Germantown, this summary can be supplemented by complementary summaries of natural areas and habitat and climate resilience. These summaries are also being provided to Germantown. This document was created by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation’s Hudson River Estuary Program and the New York State Water Resources Institute at Cornell University. The Estuary Program protects and improves the natural and scenic Hudson River watershed for all its residents. It was created in 1987 and covers the river from the Troy dam to upper New York harbor. The Estuary Program is funded by the New York State Environmental Protection Fund. The New York State Water Resources Institute at Cornell University seeks to foster an understanding of the critical connections between people and the state’s waters. It also seeks to empower communities to make informed decisions about land use that minimize impacts to water resources, including drinking water supplies, floodplains, and aquatic habitats. Additional information about water resources and the state of the Hudson Valley’s waters can be found on DEC’s webpages, starting with Clean Water for the Hudson River Estuary. For more information about this summary or the Estuary The core mission of the Program, please contact: Hudson River Estuary Andrew Meyer, Shoreline Conservation Specialist Program is to: [email protected] • Ensure clean water New York State Department of Environmental Conservation • Protect and restore Hudson River Estuary Program fish, wildlife and their 21 South Putts Corners Road habitats New Paltz, NY 12561 Phone: 845-256-3016 • Fax: 845-255-3649 • Provide water Website: http://www.dec.ny.gov/lands/4920.html recreation and river access • Adapt to climate change • Conserve world- famous scenery 2 Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 6 Watershed Characteristics ............................................................................................................................ 8 Watersheds and Subwatersheds......................................................................................................... 8 Land Cover ......................................................................................................................................... 12 Impervious Cover ...................................................................................................................... 15 Forest Cover .............................................................................................................................. 16 Farmlands .................................................................................................................................. 18 Aquifers ............................................................................................................................................. 20 USGS Aquifer Maps ................................................................................................................... 20 Other Sources of Aquifer Information ...................................................................................... 21 Public Drinking Water Supply ................................................................................................... 22 Floodplains and Riparian Buffers ...................................................................................................... 25 Floodplains ................................................................................................................................ 25 Riparian Buffers ......................................................................................................................... 27 Water Quality Standards and Assessments ................................................................................................ 29 Waterbody Classification .................................................................................................................. 29 Waterbody Assessments ................................................................................................................... 33 Lake Assessments...................................................................................................................... 33 Stream Assessments - Biomonitoring ....................................................................................... 33 Waterbody Impairment .................................................................................................................... 37 DRAFT Stream Condition Index ......................................................................................................... 41 Water Infrastructure ................................................................................................................................... 44 Stormwater Management ................................................................................................................. 44 Municipal Separated Storm Sewer System (MS4) .................................................................... 44 Construction Stormwater Management ................................................................................... 44 Post-Construction Stormwater Management and Green Infrastructure ................................. 45 SPDES Permits and Wastewater ....................................................................................................... 46 Dams and other Aquatic Barriers ...................................................................................................... 48 3 Culverts at Road Crossings ........................................................................................................ 49 Dam Replacement or Removal ................................................................................................. 49 References and Resources .......................................................................................................................... 52 Watershed Characteristics ................................................................................................................ 52 Water Quality Standards and Assessments ...................................................................................... 55 Water Infrastructure ......................................................................................................................... 56 Appendix1: Mapping and Background Information ................................................................................... 58 List of Tables Table 1: Subwatersheds and Land Cover/Land Use in Germantown, NY ................................................... 19 Table 2: Public drinking water supplies in Germantown (EPA) .................................................................. 22 Table 3: Stream and Waterbody Classifications in Germantown, NY ......................................................... 31 Table 4: DEC Stream Biomonitoring Unit Data in Germantown, NY ........................................................... 35 Table 5: Stream Segments and Impacted Uses in Germantown, NY (from the Waterbody Inventory/Priority Waterbody List, DEC DOW 2008) .................................................................................. 39 List of Figures Figure 1: Watersheds image. ........................................................................................................................ 8 Figure 2: The Roeliff Jansen Kill Watershed, Subwatersheds and Major Streams ..................................... 10 Figure 3: Subwatersheds ............................................................................................................................. 11 Figure 4: Land Cover and Land Use, including Forests, Agriculture, and Impervious Cover ...................... 14 Figure 5: Impervious Cover and
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Painted Village DRI
    Village of Tannersville Downtown Revitalization Initiative The Painted Village DRI 2 n ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Village of Tannersville earned the unique brand of “The Painted Village in the Sky.” The Village of Tannersville thanks our extraordinary community - residents, business owners, nonprofit leaders and their many employees for creating a buzz and driving this application. To say their engagement is extraordinary is an understatement. They inspire us. Our special thanks to our project sponsors for their ongoing investment in our Painted Village, and to those who donated space for meetings, time for outreach and consulting, leadership through the Village Board and other groups. They had conversation after conversation with residents (at the Post Office, the grocery store, over lunch and just walking on Main Street). We appreciate the commitments made by the Town of Hunter, the Greene County Legislature, and Greene County Department of Economic Development, Tourism and Planning who stand ready to strengthen our capacity further and enable us to drive the $64.5M of leveraged projects through implementation. Finally, we would like to thank our long-time ally, the Hunter Foundation, for their unwavering leadership and partnership every day. Together we are an unbeatable team. Being designated to participate in the DRI process will transform the future for hundreds of people and dozens of organizations who serve thousands of New Yorkers every year. Basic Information ........................................... 1 The Mayor’s Message ..................................... 2 Vision for the Painted Village DRI. ................... 4 Justification .................................................... 6 Downtown Identification .............................. 15 CONTENTS 1. Boundaries Of Proposed DRI Area .......................... 15 2. Past Investment, Future Investment Potential ....... 20 OF 3.
    [Show full text]
  • EPA Potential Hazardous Waste Site Preliminary Assessment
    '/ I FE8 >^3 1987 BUREAU OP MWAROOUS SffE CONTROL OWS«)« OF SOL>D AND HAZARDOUS WASTE EA SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY A Division of EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc. /I =5.^fia . « --- EA REPORT CHG61A PHASE I INVESTIGATION CATSKILL COAL GASIFICATION PLANT SITE TOWN OF CATSKILL GREENE COUNTY, NEW YORK Prepared for Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation 284 South Avenue Poughkeepsie, New York 12601 Prepared by EA Science and Technology R.D. 2, Goshen Turnpike Middletown, New York 10940 A Division of EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc. January 1987 CONTENTS Page 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1-1 2. PURPOSE 2-1 3. SCOPE OF WORK 3-1 4. SITE ASSESSMENT 4-1 4.1 Site History 4-1 4.2 Site Topography 4-4 4.3 Site Hydrogeology 4-5 4.4 Site Contamination 4-6 5. PRELIMINARY APPLICATION OF THE HAZARD RANKING SYSTEM 5.1 Narrative Summary 5-1 5.2 Location 5.3 HRS Worksheets 5.4 HRS Documentation Records 5.5 EPA 2070-12 5.6 EPA 2070-13 6. ASSESSMENT OF DATA ADEQUACY AND RECOMMENDATIONS 6-1 6.1 Adequacy of Existing Data 6-1 6.2 Recommendations 6-1 6.3 Phase II Work Plan 6-1 6.3.1 Task 1 Mobilization and Site Reconnaissance 6-1 6.3.2 Task 2 Preparation of Final Sampling Plan 6-2 6.3.3 Task 3 Soil Vapor Survey 6-3 6.3.4 Task 4 Test Borings and Observation Wells 6-4 6.3.5 Task 5 Sampling 6-5 6.3.6 Task 6 Contamination Assessment 6-6 6.3.7 Task 7 Remedial Cost Estimate 6-6 6.3.8 Task 8 Final Phase II Report 6-6 6.3.9 Task 9 Project Management/Quality Assurance 6-7 APPENDIX 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORTS of the TIBOR T. POLGAR FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM, 2013 David J. Yozzo, Sarah H. Fernald and Helena Andreyko Editors a Joint
    REPORTS OF THE TIBOR T. POLGAR FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM, 2013 David J. Yozzo, Sarah H. Fernald and Helena Andreyko Editors A Joint Program of The Hudson River Foundation and The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation December 2015 ABSTRACT Eight studies were conducted within the Hudson River Estuary under the auspices of the Tibor T. Polgar Fellowship Program during 2013. Major objectives of these studies included: (1) reconstruction of past climate events through analysis of sedimentary microfossils, (2) determining past and future ability of New York City salt marshes to accommodate sea level rise through vertical accretion, (3) analysis of the effects of nutrient pollution on greenhouse gas production in Hudson River marshes, (4) detection and identification of pathogens in aerosols and surface waters of Newtown Creek, (5) detection of amphetamine type stimulants at wastewater outflow sites in the Hudson River, (6) investigating establishment limitations of new populations of Oriental bittersweet in Schodack Island State Park, (7) assessing macroinvertebrate tolerance to hypoxia in the presence of water chestnut and submerged aquatic species, and (8) examining the distribution and feeding ecology of larval sea lamprey in the Hudson River basin. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ............................................................................................................... iii Preface ................................................................................................................. vii Fellowship Reports Pelagic Tropical to Subtropical Foraminifera in the Hudson River: What is their Source? Kyle M. Monahan and Dallas Abbott .................................................................. I-1 Sea Level Rise and Sediment: Recent Salt Marsh Accretion in the Hudson River Estuary Troy D. Hill and Shimon C. Anisfeld .................................................................. II-1 Nutrient Pollution in Hudson River Marshes: Effects on Greenhouse Gas Production Angel Montero, Brian Brigham, and Gregory D.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Assessment of Fish Passage Opportunities in the Tributaries of the Lower Hudson River Carl W
    Current Assessment of Fish Passage Opportunities in the Tributaries of the Lower Hudson River Carl W. Alderson1, Lisa Rosman2 1 NOAA Restoration Center, Highlands New Jersey, 2 NOAA-ORR/Assessment and Restoration Division, New York, New York NOAA’s Hudson River Fish Passage Initiative Study Team has identified 307 Lower Hudson Tributary Barrier Statistics Abstract barriers (r e d dots) to fish passage within the 65 major tributaries to the Lower • 307 Barriers Identified on 65 Tributaries (215 miles) Google Earth Elevation Profile Tool Hudson Estuary. Take notice of how The Hudson River estuary supports numerous diadromous and tightly these are clustered along the • 153 Dams, 23 Culverts/Bridges, 122 Natural, 9 TBD Demonstrating Three Examples of Potential Hudson Main Stem. Whether by the hand • Dams Constructed 1800-1999 potamodromous fish. Tributaries to the Hudson River provide critical of man or by nature’s rock, the first barrier Stream Miles Gained with Dam Removal spawning, nursery and foraging habitat for these migratory fish. to every tributary falls within short distance • Dam Height Range of 1 ft to 141 feet of the confluence of the Hudson. Here the Previous studies made recommendations for fish passage and were barriers are shown relative to the 5 major • Dam Length Range of 6 ft to 1,218 ft limited to determining the upstream fish movement at the first and watersheds of Lower Hudson from the • Spillway Width Range of 6 ft to 950 ft Battery in Manhattan to Troy, NY second barriers on each of 62 tributaries to the tidal (Lower) Hudson • Includes stream segments where slopes exceed 1:40 7 TODAY River (e.g., dams, culverts, natural falls/rapids) or to multiple barriers FUTURE GOAL Removal of dam 5 may allow • 73 Tributary Miles Currently Estimated Available to Diadromous Fish w/ dam removal 5 FUTURE GOAL EEL 6 eel to pass to RM 9.9 where for a small subset of tributaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Day Hikes.Pages
    DAY HIKES in the Saugerties Area ESOPUS BEND NATURE PRESERVE Highlights: Esopus Creek, Stony Point Near: Barclay Heights in Saugerties, NY Distance: 1.2 mile loop Difficulty: Easy Trail Condition: Maintained trail Hike Type: Loop Summary: The 156-acre preserve is located partially within both the village and town of Saugerties along a dramatic bend in the Esopus Creek. The Schroeder Trail (1.2 mile loop) follows an old farm road and footpath down to and along Esopus Creek, looping back over a historic Carriage Road, which was once used to gain access to a scow ferry that crossed Esopus Creek at Stony Point. Spur trails lead to viewpoints of the creek and Stony Point. Trailhead: From 9W take Overbaugh Street. Make a left onto Simmons Drive, a Right onto Appletree Drive and a Left onto Shady Lane. There is a parking lot that can accommodate a few cars. FALLING WATERS PRESERVE Highlights: Hudson River views, waterfalls Near: Glasco, NY Distance: roughly two miles of trails Difficulty: Easy Trail Condition: maintained trail Hike Type: Loop Summary: Falling Waters Preserve is an excellent place to explore the rugged beauty of the Hudson River, hiking atop rock ledges that slant precipitously into the water while occasionally descending to the shoreline. On your way to (or from) the mile-long trail hugging the river, you'll pass other scenic treasures, including a meadow affording outstanding views of the Catskills and a picturesque waterfall. Trailhead: From Saugerties, drive south on Route 9W; turn left onto Joseph's Drive, then turn right at the T intersection onto York Street.
    [Show full text]
  • New York Commission Order Central Hudson, Aug 14 2020
    STATE OF NEW YORK PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION At a session of the Public Service Commission held in the City of Albany on August 13, 2020 COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: John B. Rhodes, Chair Diane X. Burman James S. Alesi Tracey A. Edwards John B. Howard CASE 17-T-0816 - Petition of Central Hudson Gas and Electric Corporation for a Certificate of Environmental Compatibility and Public Need for the Rebuild of the Approximately 23.6 Mile H and SB Electric Transmission Lines to 115 kV Standards in the City of Kingston, and Towns of Ulster and Saugerties in Ulster County, and the Town of Catskill and Village of Catskill, Greene County. ORDER ADOPTING JOINT PROPOSAL (Issued and Effective August 14, 2020) BY THE COMMISSION: INTRODUCTION On December 29, 2017, Central Hudson Gas and Electric Corporation (Central Hudson or the Applicant) filed an application pursuant to Public Service Law (PSL) Article VII proposing to rebuild and operate approximately 23.6 miles of two electric transmission lines (the H and SB lines) in Ulster and Greene Counties (the Project or the Facility). On May 29, 2020, Central Hudson filed a Joint Proposal that purported to resolve all issues in this matter. In this Order, we adopt the Joint Proposal with the minor exception of some terms that are self- executing agreements governing the relationships among the CASE 17-T-0816 parties and unnecessary to our review. Accordingly, we grant to the Applicant, pursuant to PSL Article VII § 121, a conditional Certificate of Environment Compatibility and Public Need (Certificate). BACKGROUND Central Hudson’s Article VII application proposes a rebuild of existing 69 kV transmission lines designated “H” and “SB.” The Applicant stated that the rebuild will generally occur within an existing 23.6-mile-long right-of-way (ROW), with approximately 1.2 miles of the H line relocated to avoid the State designated Great Vly Wildlife Management Area.
    [Show full text]
  • Catskill Trails, 9Th Edition, 2010 New York-New Jersey Trail Conference
    Catskill Trails, 9th Edition, 2010 New York-New Jersey Trail Conference Index Feature Map (141N = North Lake Inset) Acra Point 141 Alder Creek 142, 144 Alder Lake 142, 144 Alder Lake Loop Trail 142, 144 Amber Lake 144 Andrus Hollow 142 Angle Creek 142 Arizona 141 Artists Rock 141N Ashland Pinnacle 147 Ashland Pinnacle State Forest 147 Ashley Falls 141, 141N Ashokan High Point 143 Ashokan High Point Trail 143 Ashokan Reservoir 143 Badman Cave 141N Baldwin Memorial Lean-To 141 Balsam Cap Mountain (3500+) 143 Balsam Lake 142, 143 Balsam Lake Mountain (3500+) 142 Balsam Lake Mountain Fire Tower 142 Balsam Lake Mountain Lean-To 142, 143 Balsam Lake Mountain Trail 142, 143 Balsam Lake Mountain Wild Forest 142, 143 Balsam Mountain 142 Balsam Mountain (3500+) 142 Bangle Hill 143 Barkaboom Mountain 142 Barkaboom Stream 144 Barlow Notch 147 Bastion Falls 141N Batavia Kill 141 Batavia Kill Lean-To 141 Batavia Kill Recreation Area 141 Batavia Kill Trail 141 Bear Hole Brook 143 Bear Kill 147 Bearpen Mountain (3500+) 145 Bearpen Mountain State Forest 145 Beaver Kill 141 Beaver Kill 142, 143, 144 Beaver Kill Range 143 p1 Beaver Kill Ridge 143 Beaver Meadow Lean-To 142 Beaver Pond 142 Beaverkill State Campground 144 Becker Hollow 141 Becker Hollow Trail 141 Beech Hill 144 Beech Mountain 144 Beech Mountain Nature Preserve 144 Beech Ridge Brook 145 Beecher Brook 142, 143 Beecher Lake 142 Beetree Hill 141 Belleayre Cross Country Ski Area 142 Belleayre Mountain 142 Belleayre Mountain Lean-To 142 Belleayre Ridge Trail 142 Belleayre Ski Center 142 Berry Brook
    [Show full text]
  • Hillsdale, a History by Herbert S
    Hillsdale, A History by Herbert S. Parmet Hillsdale Town Historian At the time of the American Revolution, the Taconic hill country was still basically an “unbroken wilderness,” in the words of a standard history of New York State. Most of what is now the Town of Hillsdale belonged to the Van Rensselaer family, major beneficiaries of the Dutch patroon system, and much of the modern town was within the manor of Rensselaerwyck. Colonial maps show that “Renslaerwick” also included Nobletown and Spencertown. The present location of Route 23 follows the line separating Rensselaer lands from Livingston Manor. Baronial farmlands were leased to proprietors and rented to tenant farmers. Much of upstate New York, including the vast Upper Manor of the Livingstons on the west side of the Hudson, resembled the old European feudal system. With the Revolutionary War, that system was ready for change. The Hudson Valley was one of the chief cradles of American independence, especially with the major battles fought around Saratoga and Ticonderoga. Much closer to the present Hillsdale, it furnished a route for one of the more heroic achievements of the battle for independence. Colonel Henry Knox, then only 25 and a former bookseller from Boston, joined with his brother in volunteering to retrieve munitions and cannon that had been captured by Ethan Allen and, improbable as it now seems, transported them over the snowy countryside to provide vital assistance for General Washington’s troops near Boston. The junction of county road 21 and Route 22, the site of the original Nobletown (the former name of Hillsdale), is a good place from which to appreciate Col.
    [Show full text]
  • Designated Protected and Significant Areas of Dutchess County, NY
    Chapter 7: Designated Significant and Protected Areas of Dutchess County (DRAFT) Chapter 7: Designated Protected and Significant Areas of Dutchess County, NY ______________________________________________________________________________ Emily Vail, Neil Curri, Noela Hooper, and Allison Chatrchyan1 February 2012 (DRAFT ) Significant natural areas are valued for their environmental importance Chapter Contents and beauty, and include unusual geologic features such as scenic Protected Land Critical Environmental mountain ridges, steep ravines, and caves; hydrological features such Areas as rivers, lakes, springs, and wetlands; and areas that support Other Significant Areas threatened or endangered species or unusually diverse plant and Implications for Decision- Making animal communities. Both significant natural areas and scenic Resources resources enhance the environmental health and quality of life in Dutchess County. An area can be significant for several different reasons, including its habitat, scenic, cultural, economic, or historical values. Many areas are significant because they are unique in some way. 1 This chapter was written by Emily Vail (Cornell Cooperative Extension Environment & Energy Program), Neil Curri (Cornell Cooperative Extension Dutchess County Environment & Energy Program), Noela Hooper (Dutchess County Department of Planning and Development), and Allison Chatrchyan (Cornell Cooperative Extension Dutchess County Environment & Energy Program). The chapter is presented here in DRAFT form. Final version expected March 2012. The Natural Resource Inventory of Dutchess County, NY 1 Chapter 7: Designated Significant and Protected Areas of Dutchess County (DRAFT) Significant natural areas provide many ecosystem services, including wildlife habitat, water supply protection, recreational space, and opportunities for outdoor research. (For more information on ecosystem services, see Chapter 1: Introduction.) In order to sustain their value, it is import to protect these areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Roeliff Jansen Kill 2016
    COMMUNITY WATER QUALITY MONITORING RESULTS ROELIFF JANSEN KILL 2016 OVERVIEW WATERSHED SNAPSHOT Riverkeeper and our partners have been testing These results are for non‐tidal sites only. the Hudson River and its tributaries for the As measured against the Environmental Protection fecal-indicator bacteria Enterococcus (“Entero”) Agency’s recommended Beach Action Value for safe since 2006. Sources of fecal contamination may swimming: include sewage infrastructure failures, sewer overflows, inadequate sewage treatment, septic system failures, agricultural runoff, urban 12% runoff, and wildlife. of Roeliff Jansen Kill samples failed. As measured against the EPA’s recommended In 2016, we began working with the Roe Jan geometric mean (GM, a weighted long‐term average) Watershed Community criterion for safe swimming: (www.roejanwatershed.org) and the Bard Water Lab to conduct testing in the Roeliff Jansen Kill. EPA GM threshold Roe Jan GM Samples were collected monthly (May to October) at 14 watershed locations by Roe Jan 30 24.8 Watershed Community members and local cells/100 mL cells/100 mL residents, and processed by the Bard Water Lab. A total of 84 samples were analyzed in 2016. This water quality monitoring study is designed 3 Best Sites 3 Worst Sites to learn about broad patterns and trends. The Livingston‐ Ancram‐ Hall Hill data can help inform choices about recreation in Above/Below Road Bridge (#6) the creek, but cannot predict future water Bingham Mills (#8, 9) Copake‐ Noster Kill quality at any particular time and place. Germantown‐ trib at Route 7A (#4) Sportsmen’s Club Ancram‐ Wiltsie All results will be available at (#10) Road Bridge fishing www.riverkeeper.org/water-quality/citizen- Hillsdale‐ Collins St access (#5) data/roeliff-jansen-kill soon.
    [Show full text]
  • SUMMER 1993 PAGE THREE in 1926, Powers a Saw Mill, a Woodworking Shop, and a Feed E.A.I.A
    THE MILL Sawyers and Millwrights AT LEDYARD, of Saugerties, New York CONNECTICUT I n response to my request for information on up-and.-down sawmills, a friend in Albany county, New York, sent a draw­ ing of a blade he had document­ ed on a mill at Kent, Connecti­ cut, and a letter telling of anot-her vertical mill he had discovered in Ledyard, Connect­ icut. He had visited the Led­ yard site in July but it was not in operation because the water in the millpond was low. He planned to go back in April or May of this year when the mill would De working and open to the public. In early May I called the number he had given me and was told b,y Ruth Dyer, one of the volunteers at the site, that the mill had just suffered a major breakdown. The men who O1arlie i:nd Michael Rothe TrainiQ9 Their Tean, Michael operate and maintain it were keeps six Belgian hOrses for logglng. They are ideal for working on the problem but were selective harvesting and do less dcmage to the forest than not sure when it would be oper­ modern diesel equipment, (Photo by P.Sinclair) ational. I told her I would come anyway. Afterall, mainte­ nance and repair are important aspects of a water mill. Ithough little remains in the vritten record, some Ledyard, Connecticut, is A a hilly township a few miles believed there was a sawmill in the mid-Hudson Valley at from the states southern coast the present town of Saugerties, New York, before the area It lies in the watershed of the was formally settled in the 168Os.
    [Show full text]
  • Ulster County Bridge Locations STP-Off System Eligibility
    Ulster County Bridge Locations STP-Off System Eligibility son off R Nel oad H ad eek Ro d h Cr a 32A irc o DC B per R p k Kel U l ly R oad a oa ek R V d e d C r h h C a a o r r Birc l e R e s v Lowe i r S m D m l e oad w i t h h ie l R i R e V ley o d W a a Bar o d Rid R Rg d a a k lp h o e V e ed R r d s lliot Roa C er l e E d 49A R l av 56 h a D 34 W o c 56 d a F e r d s d i le o S a har mm s a a C h t B in o e C t o l R R i a K o g a R H a m t e d Fa h l w p e n l n H i R r i o R i a a n v d d o t a e r o a D n o R d u 42 r z i n d t v l o C a D a u e h n RD d o Road so M c tter a M S Pa R R 32 e o n r s i DC h R v a o o low J M k e en Tic R w ur e a a R ol o h L o a l a t P S d H l d y o a a Old St a r at d o k e 3 s 2 a R t d R H o e a Peck n o e R B o r d e r 87 a a in R § t k d ¨¦ d k s o r r y i R R e r d o i k i a t l a t s d A o e u V t r n nu r Ave e n u n B n B B n u d a a A n o o y a V R d r M r a a V e M k o a d R 5636 a B 28 o k ad d d Hommelville Road a l DC R n 33 o O a 56 Ro Baran Ridge Road e Rid w B R o d er l le a S l e o g g l n o n d o a R Lod a ol L C r i l a l d o L e e w r R os o v e t o a oad x l e C R H Peop R H lo o C a p Kro r u y Y 49 v F S t o g R e n o 56 e les a o e d d a R t T h d t d S a d o Roa s X a a a o d a d E o K L e R d Roa rd R ue a m h p n e a o n an H tc m R R a a 35 o 56 Av a C d w P ton o ss d l d l 214 o a d n g outm in r o a a DC o h C o H s B H R R a r r W e e w v d o l l i n l d o S a oad a 28 J r R o e t w Lane DC s k R s d lo s n H O a ol e d z o i oa and t o v R p l anes M R i l hl
    [Show full text]