Webster Fishing District Newsletter 5-7-2013
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Comparison of Sediment Deposition in Reservoirs of Four Kansas Watersheds David P
Comparison of Sediment Deposition in Reservoirs of Four Kansas Watersheds David P. Mau and Victoria G. Christensen Reservoirs are a vital source of water Kansas in 1995. Nine supply, provide recreational opportunities, reservoir studies have been support diverse aquatic habitat, and carried out in cooperation provide flood protection throughout with the Bureau of Kansas. Understanding agricultural, Reclamation, the city of industrial, and urban effects on reservoirs Wichita, Johnson County is important not only for maintaining Unified Wastewater acceptable water quality in the reservoirs Districts, the Kansas but also for preventing adverse Department of Health and environmental effects. Excessive sediment Environment, and (or) the can alter the aesthetic qualities of Kansas Water Office. These reservoirs and affect their water quality studies were supported in and useful life. part by the Kansas State Water Plan Fund and Introduction evaluated sediment deposition along with Figure 1. Bottom-sediment cores were collected with a gravity Reservoir sediment studies are selected chemical corer mounted on a pontoon boat. The corer is lowered to a important because of the effect that constituents in sediment designated distance above the sediment and allowed to free sediment accumulation has on the quality cores (fig. 1) from fall to penetrate through the entire thickness of reservoir of water and useful life of the reservoir. reservoirs located in bottom sediment. Sediment deposition can affect benthic various climatic, organisms and alter the dynamics of the topographic, and geologic landscape annual precipitation ranges from about aquatic food chain. Reservoir sediment regions throughout Kansas and southern 24 inches at Webster Reservoir in north- studies also are important in relation to Nebraska. -
Lake Level Management Plans Water Year 2021
LAKE LEVEL MANAGEMENT PLANS WATER YEAR 2021 Kansas Water Office September 2020 Table of Contents U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, KANSAS CITY DISTRICT .................................................................................................................................... 3 CLINTON LAKE ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................4 HILLSDALE LAKE ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................6 KANOPOLIS LAKE .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................8 MELVERN LAKE .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................10 MILFORD LAKE ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................12 -
Kansas Resource Management Plan and Record of Decision
United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Tulsa District Oklahoma Resource Area September 1991 KANSAS RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN Dear Reader: This doCument contains the combined Kansas Record of Decision (ROD) and Resource Management Plan (RMP). The ROD and RMP are combined to streamline our mandated land-use-planning requirements and to provide the reader with a useable finished product. The ROD records the decisions of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for administration of approximately 744,000 acres of Federal mineral estate within the Kansas Planning Area. The Planning Area encompasses BLM adm in i sterad sp 1 it-estate mi nera 1 s and Federa 1 minerals under Federal surface administered by other Federal Agencies within the State of Kansas. The Kansas RMP and appendices provide direction and guidance to BLM Managers in the formulation of decisions effecting the management of Federal mineral estate within the planning area for the next 15 years. The Kansas RMP was extracted from the Proposed Kansas RMP/FIES. The issuance of this ROD and RMP completes the BLM land use planning process for the State of Kansas. We now move to implementation of the plan. We wish to thank all the individuals and groups who participated in this effort these past two years, without their help we could not have completed this process. er~ 1_' Area Manager Oklahoma Resource Area RECORD OF DECISION on the Proposed Kansas Resource Management Plan and Final Environmental Impact Statement September 1991 RECORD OF DECISION The decision is hereby made to approve the proposed decision as described in the Proposed Kansas Resource Management Plan/Final Env ironmental Impact Statement (RMP/FEIS July 1991), MANAGEMENT CONSZOERATXONS The decision to approve the Proposed Plan is based on: (1) the input received from the public, other Federal and state agencies; (2) the environmental analysis for the alternatives considered in the Draft RMP/Oraft EIS, as we11 as the Proposed Kansas RMP/FEIS. -
Lake Level Management Plans Water Year 2017
LAKE LEVEL MANAGEMENT PLANS WATER YEAR 2017 KANSAS WATER OFFICE 2016 CORPS OF ENGINEERS, KANSAS CITY DISTRICT ............................................................................................................................................................ 1 CLINTON LAKE ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 3 HILLSDALE LAKE ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 KANOPOLIS LAKE ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 7 MELVERN LAKE ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 MILFORD LAKE ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 11 PERRY LAKE ............................................................................................................................................................................................................. -
2005 Guidebook
KANSAS FIELD CONFERENCE FIELD GUIDE 2005 FIELD CONFERENCE CENTRAL GREAT PLAINS WATER, RECREATION, AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT JUNE 8–10, 2005 EDITED BY ROBERT S. SAWIN REX C. BUCHANAN CATHERINE S. EVANS JAMES R. MCCAULEY THIS PROJECT IS OPERATED BY THE KANSAS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY AND FUNDED, IN PART, BY THE KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE AND PARKS, THE KANSAS WATER OFFICE, AND THE KANSAS DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES. KANSAS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGY EXTENSION THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS 1930 CONSTANT AVE. LAWRENCE, KANSAS 66047–3726 KGS OPEN-FILE TELEPHONE: (785) 864–3965 REPORT 2005–17 WWW.KGS.KU.EDU CENTRAL GREAT PLAINS WATER, RECREATION, AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 2005 FIELD CONFERENCE 3 2 7 8 1 6 5 Proposed HorseThief Reservoir 4 Wednesday Thursday Friday 0 10 mi KANSAS FIELD CONFERENCE Central Great Plains Water, Recreation, and Economic Development 2005 FIELD CONFERENCE June 8-10, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS CONFERENCE PARTICIPANTS Participants List ....................................................................................................... 1 - 1 Biographical Information ........................................................................................ 1 - 5 KANSAS FIELD CONFERENCE 2005 Field Conference – “Central Great Plains – Water, Recreation, and Economic Development” ....... 2 - 1 Sponsors .................................................................................................................. 2 - 3 Kansas Geological Survey ................................................................................ -
Bulletin Published Qu.4Ktekly
BULLETIN PUBLISHED QU.4KTEKLY March, 1992 No. 1 THE WINTER BIRD COUNT FOR 1991 Max (:. Thompson The winter bird count of 1991 will eo down in KOS history as the vear with the largest number of counts ever taken in the state. A record 42 counts were made, 43 it' yo; count one that did not conform to the guidelines. There were only 582 participants but a near record 150 species werr seen. Some species were recorded only during the count week and if they had been put into the counts, there would have been a new record. The highest number ever recorded was 152 in 1990. The highest number of species observed was shared by Ernporia and Manhattan with 83 species each. This could very well be called the "vear of the gull". There were eight species seen, including two gulls new to the count. There were two probable California Gulls seen, one on the Udall-Winfield count and one at the Wilson Reservoir count. There was one probable Black-legged Kittiwake seen at Olathe. Gulls are notoriously hard to identify and sightings without specimens are always open to question. A Pomarine Jaeger seen at Junction City was a first winter count record. Another new species seen on the 1991 count were the five Trumpeter Swans at Webster Reservoir. Unfortunately, four of the five were later shot and killed by persons unknown. Another I'rumpeter Swan was reported from Sawyer. While there were no real surprises in the waterfowl counted, there were some surpris- ing numbers. Blue-winged Teal were present with 18 at Garden City and 400 at Parsons. -
Deposition of Selenium and Other Constituents in Reservoir Bottom Sediment of the Solomon River Basin, North-Central Kansas
Prepared in cooperation with the O'O BUREAU OF RECLAMATION Deposition of Selenium and Other Constituents in Reservoir Bottom Sediment of the Solomon River Basin, North-Central Kansas Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-4230 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey B. E. D. A. Dam overlooking Kirwin Reservoir B. Waconda Lake C. Webster Reservoir D. Kirwin National Wildlife Refuge E. Gravity corer mounted on pontoon boat (photographs A-D taken by author; photograph E taken by David P. Mau, U.S. Geological Survey, Lawrence, Kansas) U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Prepared in cooperation with the BUREAU OF RECLAMATION Deposition of Selenium and Other Constituents in Reservoir Bottom Sediment of the Solomon River Basin, North-Central Kansas By VICTORIA G. CHRISTENSEN Water-Resources Investigations Report 99-4230 Lawrence, Kansas 1999 U.S. Department of the Interior Bruce Babbitt, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Charles G. Groat, Director The use of brand, firm, or trade names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Geological Survey. For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Information Services 4821 Quail Crest Place Building 810 Lawrence, KS 66049-3839 Box 25286, Federal Center Denver, CO 80225-0286 CONTENTS Abstract...............................................................................................................^ 1 Introduction -
2020 Kansas Statutes
2020 Kansas Statutes 74-4545. State park authority authorized to negotiate and renegotiate leases for lands in Cheney, Clinton, Elk City, Fall River, Lovewell, Toronto, Perry, Tuttle Creek, Webster and Wilson state parks. The state park and resources authority is hereby authorized to negotiate and to renegotiate leases for lands in designated state parks with agencies of the federal government or with the state of Kansas, or any agency or political subdivision thereof, having control of lands to provide for approximate changes in acreage within the designated parks as follows: Cheney State Park, Cheney reservoir, located in Kingman, Reno and Sedgwick counties; decrease in acreage by approximately 306 acres—being that area south of 21st street lying in Kingman county; that area south of 21st street lying in Sedgwick county, except the triangular area south of 21st street between the old and new river channels; and that area north of 21st street lying east of F.A.S. route 556, Sedgwick county, and F.A.S. route 659, Reno county. Fall River State Park, Fall River reservoir, located in Greenwood county, decrease in acreage by approximately 2028 acres located in the Casner Creek cove and the Badger Creek cove; and decrease in acreage by approximately 130 acres, being that area lying to the north in the upper drainage of the Quarry Bay area, described as that portion lying east of the access road in the S1/2, SE1/4, NE1/4, section 26, and that portion lying north of and east of the access road in the SW1/4, section 25, and in the N1/2, NE1/4, SE1/4, section 26, all in township 27S, range 12E. -
Lake Level Management Plans Water Year 2018
LAKE LEVEL MANAGEMENT PLANS WATER YEAR 2018 Kansas Water Office 2017 Table of Contents CORPS OF ENGINEERS, KANSAS CITY DISTRICT ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 CLINTON LAKE .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 HILLSDALE LAKE ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 7 KANOPOLIS LAKE .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 9 MILFORD LAKE ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 13 POMONA LAKE .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... -
KS State Parks Guide Booklet
KKaannssaass SSttaattee PPaarrkkss Cross Timbers State Park KaMnosreaTshaSn MteaettseThPe aEyre ks: he Kansas Department of Wildlife and Parks manages 24 state parks across the state. Most provide utility and primitive camping, and access to reservoirs, trails, and wildlife areas. A few Tare preserved natural areas, allowing visitors to enjoy unspoiled wild Kansas. Many parks host annual events such as concerts, festivals, and com - petitions. Whatever your outdoor interest — hiking, camping, wildlife observation, fishing, bike riding, horseback riding, hunting, or just plain relaxing, a Kansas state park has what you’re looking for. If you’ve never been to a Kansas state park, use this guide to find the nearest one. Visit our website for current park fees at www.kdwp.state.ks.us or call one of the offices listed in the back of this publica - tion. If you haven’t visited a state park recently, look again. There’s a rich collection of outdoor adventures waiting for you. Cross Timbers State Park El Dorado State Park 2 ) (B S P ) A - Available U (B K S S O P B - Available at extra charge O U E H K S C - Limited times . O K N ) C C O ) ) R O (B I LE H B (B A TI D - Fishing boats only S E ( S A ) L V IC Y S E S S M T B A A & R L E T ) E K ) D S S ( IC H E - In non-state areas R E , T N IT I (B E N C (B N E S C R R C O S S S A N A S G N TR A E A E E E P U L O L O L U IN I E S F W L L Y L M D A I L O B C B S E O E E A IT B A O P Y T T A N A E R S IC L A C H M S N A C H A C L G C R , & I V - R A E G E T I R E L E IN A E R R R T R A E R T IN R -
Outdoor Recreation and Tourism in Kansas; a Survey of Participation
DOCUMENT RESUME RC 005 733 ED 056 809 Smythe, Patrick E. AUTHOR Tourism in Kansas; A Surveyof TITLE Outdoor Recreation and Particioation and Demand. Kansas State Univ.,Manhattan. Extension Service. INSTITUTION Washington, D.C. SPONS AGENCY Department of Agriculture, REPORT NO M7-209; P-2 PUB DATE Oct 5 r3 NOTE 52p. MF-$0.65 HC-$3.29 EDRS PRTCE Questionnaires; *Recreation; DESCRIPTORS Camping; Interviews; *Recreational Activities;*State Surveys; *Tables (Data); *Tourism IDENTIFIERS Kansas ABSTRACT The purpose of the surveyreported in this document and demand for outdoor was to gatherinformation on participation Kansas to serve as aguide for public or recreation and tourism in outdoor recreation orivate groups and personsinterested in providing and services. Nonresidenttravelers in the and tourist facilities October, 1966, western half of Kansas wereinterviewed from August to other state personnel,members of local by highway patrolmen, others. State residents chambers of commerce andwomen's clubs, and Smith, Graham, Rooks,Osborne, Gove, Trego, from Norton, Phillips, during the fall of 1966by Ellis, and Russell countieswere surveyed communities, stratifyingthose selected, randomly selecting Kansas presented, for and randomly sampling eachstratum. Findings are separately, on pastactivities over a in-state and nonresident users the next 12 months. 12-month period andanticipates activities over Related documents are RC005 732 and RC 005734. (BO) tdr ecreaLiion U.S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, Fr 11, EDUCATION A., WELFARE u, K ns OFFICE OF EDUCATION II DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRO- UCED EXACTLY AS RECEIV D FROM R eport 2 HE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION OFIIG- gATING IT POINTS OF VIEW OR OPIN- -)NS STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY EPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE OF EDU ATION POSITION OR POLICY a surveyof participation anddemand Cr CD F. -
Sedimentation in Our Reservoirs: Solutions and Causes Sedimentation in Our Reservoirs: Causes and Solutions
This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu. Sedimentation in Our Reservoirs: Causes and Solutions Sedimentation in Our Reservoirs: Sedimentation in Our Reservoirs: Causes and Solutions Kansas Water Office Kansas Water Resources Institute Kansas Center for Agricultural Resources and the Environment Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service This publication from the Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service has been archived. Current information is available from http://www.ksre.ksu.edu. Table of Contents Reservoirs: Infrastructure for Our Future 3 Tracy Streeter Sedimentation and the Future of Reservoirs in Kansas 5 W. L. Hargrove Reservoirs in Kansas 7 Current State, Trend, and Spatial Variability of Sediment in Kansas Reservoirs 9 Frank deNoyelles, Mark Jakubauskas Methods for Assessing Sedimentation in Reservoirs 25 Mark Jakubauskas, Frank deNoyelles Effects of Sedimentation on Biological Resources 35 Donald G. Huggins, Robert C. Everhart, Andrew Dzialowski, James Kriz, Debra S. Baker Management Practices to Control Sediment Loading From Agricultural Landscapes in Kansas 47 Daniel Devlin, Philip Barnes Can Reservoir Management Reduce Sediment Deposition? 57 Debra Baker, Frank deNoyelles Economic Issues of Watershed Protection and Reservoir Rehabilitation 71 Jeff Williams, Craig Smith Reusing Dredged Sediment: Geochemical and Ecological Considerations 103 Margaret A. Townsend, Nathan O. Nelson, Deborah Goard, DeAnn Presley Photo Credits Dan Devlin, K-State Research and Extension: Susan Brown, K-State Research and Extension: Pages 25, 35, 51, 55, 67 Pages 18, 143 Jennifer Anderson, USDA NRCS PLANTS Database: U.S.