DOCSLIB.ORG

Gedeo Zone (Snnpr) Data Collected: 9 - 11 July 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX ETHIOPIA RAPID RESPONSE ASSESSMENT REPORT ZONE OVERVIEW: GEDEO ZONE (SNNPR) DATA COLLECTED: 9 - 11 JULY 2018 SUMMARY As of June 2018 renewed inter-communal violence in Gedeo (SNNPR) zone has displaced an estimated 822,187 people (113,760 households). The majority of those displaced are staying in host communities and collective centres, while others are in spontaneous sites and dispersed settlements. Population movements remain fluid as IDPs continue to commute on a regular basis between IDP sites and host communities. Sidama Proportion of IDPs in type of site Hadiya Arsi KTAlaba IDPs in Camps Sidama Hadiya West Arsi Dila Town Wolayita IDPs in Host Communities 62,511 Sidama Dila Town ! Bale Gamo GofaGedio Dila Zuria Abaya Guji Wenago 20!,327 West Guji Bule Abaya Borena Dila Zuria Liben Yirgachefe Town 41,!180 Yirgachefe Wenago Bule ! Kochere 45,840 West Guji Gedeb OVERVIEW OF Gelana 133,904 Kercha ! Yirgachefe DISPLACEMENT: Bule Hora ! 50,442 Guji Yirgachefe Town GEDEO ZONE Guji Gelana 104,543 ! Woredas No. Sites West Guji Kochere Bule 41 Dila Zuria 20 ! Dila Town 4 200,000 - 363,901 100,000 - 200,000 363,440 Hambela Wamena Kochere 45 50,000 - 100,000 Gedeb <50, 000 Gedeb 31 Kercha Wanago 21 This map is for illustration purposes only. The boundaries and Yirgachefe Town 8 names shown and the designations used on this map do not Bule Hora imply official endorsement or acceptance by the International 0 3 6 12 18 Yirgachefe 13 Organization for Migration. Kms Hera Liphitu * KEY INFORMANTS CONTACTED FOR THIS ASSESSMENTGarb WEREa 02 WOREDA ANDKerc aZONAL 01 GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS Segen PeopMETHODOLOGYles' Kercha Birbirsa Kojowa DTM Rapid Response Assessments are designed to 822,187 113,760 provide up-to-date information on large scale population Displaced Displaced Individuals Households displacement occurring spontaneously outside of the DTM Mobility Tracking data collection periods. The Rapid Response Assessment tool is a simplified version of the 307,741 514,446 Mobility Tracking tool and is deployed at Woreda level In Collective Centres/ In Host Communities to collect basic information about displaced populations Camp settings through key informants. The aim of the assessment is to The majority of identified IDPs were provide the humanitarian community with initial population displaced in June 2018 estimates and displacement site lists in an emergency context to facilitate the coordination and planning of the first response. IOM collaborated closely with Zonal and Woreda Food was reported as the primary need in officials as well as the Ethiopian Red Cross to implement the the zone. Rapid Response Assessment in Gedeo zone, SNNPR. DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX ETHIOPIA RAPID RESPONSE ASSESSMENT WOREDA PROFILE: BULE 9 - 11 JULY 2018 )" Haroresa )" " Otilcho Mochise Sisota ) Ayekelesuke Sidama Mchle Shakusa *# West Guji Chic)"hu )" Miche Segirasa )" )" Herede Mchle H)"uluna Guji Tumiticha Gele)"dacho Gedeo Dila Zuria )" 2nd O)"kolu Tumata C)"hrecha Amba )" 1st Okolu )" )" )" Basura Asshotum Hafero Segen Peoples' Wenago Town Kera)" Sodity B)"usa Osole Majo )" D)"aro " Bele Bukisa Tokocha Kesacha ) *# )" *# )" Haseharo )" B*#ULE)" TOWN Summary of Bule Woreda Key su)"gale )" Ad)"ado )" *#*#*# Wenago Wechema Findings Sika Jem)"jemo Ho)"ticha *# Deko Wet)"iko )" *# 45,840 7,802 S)"okicha )" Kolesha kara )" )" Benitsibu Suqo Displaced Displaced MeKonisa Dabota )" *# Individuals Dod)"oro Households Ga)"selcho )" Koc)"hore Agamesa 8,403 IDPs 37,437 IDPs )" Esalecha Loqe Chelba Gerbota 1 Wekadi Bitu In Collective In Host Dekuwa)" Hashere Banko Okoto Chera)"qa Has)"emo Centres/ Camp Communities Chitu Bule )" settings Gerbota 2 Gubeto Haware *#Dumerso The majority of identified IDPs were Deretu " )" Rape )Tora displaced in June 2018 Buduqesa Harow)"esabu Tulase Mehado)" Wsage Wegeda Chur)"ebaneta NFIs were reported as the primanry need Ber)"edabochesa Hede)"neMuture Adamea in the Woreda. Gasha)"saba )" Arecha ElaTenecha *#*# Huro)" Betela Yirgachefe )" Cheqesasisha Legend Kokea Number of IDPs per Kebele Nursea Saba R)"eji < 500 Bewecha denego 500 - 1.000 Host Community )" Udesa HaroBadamea * ALL KEBELE BOUNDERIES INDICATED ON Konga 1.000 - 5.000 Site BerbesKela MAPS ARE FOR OPERATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY 5.000 - 10.000 AND DO NOT NECESSARILY REFLECT THE MOST Camp/Collective *# Mora Leu 10.000 - 20.000 Wetea Doki Dima BeteGoto *# Sayurasa RECENT OFFICAL KEBELE BOUNDERIES. Centre )" Bisha Mora )" 20.000 - 83.118 Kisha Kochere Kurimi *# Kochere Gedeb Woreda Site List Woreda Kebele Site Name Site Type Number of individuals Number of HH GPS Long. GPS Lat. Bule Bule Town Fird bet Camp 950 184 38.41088 6.29314 Bule Town Sefere selam Camp 943 174 38.40843 6.30171 Bule Town Qilto kalehiwot Camp 546 81 38.40682 6.29428 Sika Sika Camp 806 101 38.40818 6.28487 Bule Town Miker bet Camp 693 105 38.40406 6.30583 Bule Town 02 FTC Camp 320 62 38.40722 6.30352 Suqo Suqo Camp 796 136 38.41184 6.27488 Esalecha Esalecha Loqe Camp 1,572 162 38.42372 6.26591 Loqe Bule Town Youth Center Camp 398 66 38.41145 6.29393 Bule Town Bule dero Camp 1,379 127 38.41171 6.29517 Suqo Suqo kebele Host Community 692 123 DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX ETHIOPIA RAPID RESPONSE ASSESSMENT WOREDA PROFILE: BULE 9 - 11 JULY 2018 Woreda Kebele Site Name Type (Camp/Host Number of individuals Number of HH GPS GPS Lat. Community) Long. Osole Majo Osole Majo Host Community 757 143 Bule Town Bule 03 Host Community 1,409 266 1st Okolu 1st Okolu Host Community 465 74 Herede Herede Host Community 664 98 Basura Basura Host Community 1,119 175 Daro Daro Host Community 1,073 182 Bule Bule Town Bule 01 Host Community 533 99 Kochore Kochore Host Community 1,210 205 2nd Okolu 2nd Okolu Host Community 517 98 Geledacho Geledacho Host Community 877 150 Churebaneta Churebaneta Host Community 1,212 193 Rape 01 Rape 01 Host Community 1,119 233 Layo Layo Host Community 2,076 393 Cheqesasisha Cheqesasisha Host Community 2,849 364 Harowesabu Harowesabu Host Community 2,148 320 Gashasaba Laba gasha Host Community 709 171 Saba reji Saba reji Host Community 974 156 Rape tora Rape tora Host Community 867 151 Wekadi bitu Wekadi bitu Host Community 958 220 Cheraqa Cheraqa Host Community 845 161 Dekuwa Hashere Dekuwa Hashere Host Community 391 105 Kolesha kara Kolesha kara Host Community 449 93 Adado Adado Host Community 1,231 196 Bule Town Bule 02 Host Community 3,082 468 Sayurasa Sayurasa Host Community 1,315 192 Agamesa Agamesa Host Community 1,291 251 Hedenemuture Hedenemuture Host Community 1,514 282 Mehado wsage Mehado wsage Host Community 2,734 500 Beredabochesa Beredabochesa Host Community 1,174 361 Gubeto Haware Gubeto Haware Host Community 1,183 181 DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX ETHIOPIA RAPID RESPONSE ASSESSMENT WOREDA PROFILE: DILA ZURIA 9 - 11 JULY 2018 * ALL KEBELE Sidama *# BOUNDERIES Dila Town West Guji Dila Town )" Gosa And"ida INDICATED ON ) " *# Shig)edo Guji Ot)"ilcho MAPS ARE FOR # Gedeo Haroresa * OPERATIONAL )" PURPOSES ONLY )" Ayekelesuke Segen Peoples' AND DO NOT " Moch)ise Sisota )" NECESSARILY Mchle Shakusa REFLECT THE Summary of Dila Zuria Woreda MOST RECENT *# Key Findings )" )" OFFICAL KEBELE Chichu Miche Segirasa 20,327 3,228 )" Herede Dila Zuria )" Displaced BOUNDERIES. Mchle H)"uluna Displaced Individuals Households Tumiticha Gel)"edacho 1,745 IDPs 18,582 IDPs )" )" )" Amba 2nd Okolu Tumata Chrecha )" In Collective In Host 1st Okolu )" )" Centres/ Camp Communities )" Basura Asshotum Hafero settings Wenago Town The majority of identified IDPs were B)"usa Da)"ro displaced in June 2018 Haseharo )" Osole Majo *# *# )" Bele Bukisa )" *#BULE TOWN )" )" )" su)"gale Tokocha )" Adado Kesacha *# Food was reported as the primanry need )" *# *#*# Wenago Wechema in the Woreda. Bule Sika Hot)"icha *# Wetiko Legend )" *# Number of IDPs per Kebele Kolesh)"a kara Sok)"icha )" < 500 Host Community )" Benitsibu Suqo Dabota )" *# 500 - 1.000 Site 1.000 - 5.000 5.000 - 10.000 Camp/Collective Gaselcho Agamesa Esalecha Loqe )" Wekadi Bitu Kochore 10.000 - 20.000 Centre Dodoro Cheraqa Dekuwa Hashere )" Gerbota 1 )" 20.000 - 83.118 Hasemo Gubeto Haware Woreda Site List Woreda Kebele Name of location/site Site Type Number of individuals Number of HH GPS Long. GPS Lat. Dila Zuria Chichu Chichu Youth Center Camp 1,745 325 38.30346 6.36554 Chichu Chichu kebele Host Community 4,569 715 Asshotum Hafero Asshotum Hafero Host Community 1,319 226 Amba Amba Host Community 1,325 185 Tumiticha Tumticha rural Host Community 848 131 Tumiticha Tumticha 01 Host Community 1,632 234 Benitsibu Belatisebi Host Community 698 119 Wechema Wechema Host Community 695 124 Hoticha Hoticha Host Community 653 115 Busa Busa Host Community 1,230 228 Ayekelesuke Aytila suke Host Community 845 95 Miche Segirasa Miche segirasa Host Community 690 105 Otilcho Otilcho Host Community 468 68 Mchle shakusa Mchle shakusa Host Community 578 88 Shigedo Shigedo Host Community 637 109 Mchle huluna Mchle huluna Host Community 1,490 202 Andida Andida 01 Host Community 233 39 Mochise sisota Mochise sisota Host Community 153 23 Andida Andida rural Host Community 300 64 Gosa Gosa Host Community 219 33 DISPLACEMENT TRACKING MATRIX ETHIOPIA RAPID RESPONSE ASSESSMENT WOREDA PROFILE: DILA TOWN 9 - 11 JULY 2018 Sidama West Guji Guji Gedeo Segen Peoples' Summary of Dila Town Woreda Key Findings *# 62,511 9,789 Displaced Displaced Individuals Households 62,511 0 In Collective In Host Centres/ Camp Communities *# Dila Town Dila Town settings The majority of identified IDPs were displaced in June 2018 )" Gosa Food was reported as the primanry need *# in the Woreda. *# Haroresa Legend Dila Zuria Number of IDPs per Kebele < 500 Host Community * ALL KEBELE BOUNDERIES INDICATED 500 - 1.000 Site ON MAPS ARE FOR OPERATIONAL 1.000 - 5.000 PURPOSES ONLY AND DO NOT Mochise Sisota 5.000 - 10.000 Camp/Collective 10.000 - 20.000 NECESSARILY REFLECT THE MOST RECENT Chichu Centre OFFICAL KEBELE BOUNDERIES.
Recommended publications
  • Districts of Ethiopia

    Districts of Ethiopia

    Region District or Woredas Zone Remarks Afar Region Argobba Special Woreda -- Independent district/woredas Afar Region Afambo Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Asayita Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Chifra Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Dubti Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Elidar Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Kori Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Mille Zone 1 (Awsi Rasu) Afar Region Abala Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Afdera Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Berhale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Dallol Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Erebti Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Koneba Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Megale Zone 2 (Kilbet Rasu) Afar Region Amibara Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Awash Fentale Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Bure Mudaytu Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Dulecha Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Gewane Zone 3 (Gabi Rasu) Afar Region Aura Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Ewa Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Gulina Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Teru Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Yalo Zone 4 (Fantena Rasu) Afar Region Dalifage (formerly known as Artuma) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Dewe Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Hadele Ele (formerly known as Fursi) Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Simurobi Gele'alo Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Afar Region Telalak Zone 5 (Hari Rasu) Amhara Region Achefer -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Angolalla Terana Asagirt -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Artuma Fursina Jile -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Banja -- Defunct district/woredas Amhara Region Belessa --
  • Midterm Survey Protocol

    Midterm Survey Protocol

    Protocol for L10K Midterm Survey The Last 10 Kilometers Project JSI Research & Training Institute, Inc. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia October 2010 Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 The Last Ten Kilometers Project ............................................................................................................ 3 Objective one activities cover all the L10K woredas: .......................................................................... 4 Activities for objectives two, three and four in selected woredas ...................................................... 5 The purpose of the midterm survey ....................................................................................................... 6 The midterm survey design ...................................................................................................................... 7 Annex 1: List of L10K woredas by region, implementation strategy, and implementing phase ......... 10 Annex 2: Maps.................................................................................................................................................. 11 Annex 3: Research questions with their corresponding study design ...................................................... 14 Annex 4: Baseline survey methodology ........................................................................................................ 15 Annex 5: L10K midterm survey
  • Ethiopia: West Guji – Gedeo Conflict Displacement Flash Update 2

    Ethiopia: West Guji – Gedeo Conflict Displacement Flash Update 2

    Ethiopia: West Guji – Gedeo Conflict Displacement Flash Update 2 22 May 2018 Highlights • A rapid assessment conducted in Gedeo zone (SNNPR) found that at least 274,5481 people were displaced from West Guji (Oromia) to Gedeo zone following the violence that erupted along the regional boundary in mid-April. Some 84,000 people were also displaced in West Guji zone. More than 4,000 houses were reportedly burnt down or damaged in West Guji and livelihoods destroyed. • Official reports indicate that as of early May, 102,593 people of the 274,548 people displaced in Gedeo were returned to their villages in West Guji zone • The Government, the local community and civil society were the first and main responders to date, with sup- port from few partners. Significant gaps in food, shelter, NFI and WaSH are reported • Although there were no reported health outbreaks so far, AWD, scabies and measles are potential health risks due to the use of water from unsafe sources, open defecation, overcrowded shelter and sharing of clothes. The overcrowded shelter conditions within hosting households also present protection concerns. Dara Sidama Dila I. Displacement overview ! 12,176 452 Bore Chichu A rapid assessment conducted in Gedeo zone ! 3,772 (SNNPR) from 2 to 8 May found that at least Dila Zuria stite eturns 274,548 people (139,494 male; 135,104 female) Wenago einin ! were displaced from West Guji (Oromia) to Gedeo Bule isceent 4,844 ! Koti ! zone, following the inter-communal violence that 8,198 Ilalcha ! erupted in mid-April 2018 along the borders of the Wenago Bule Abaya two zones.
  • Displacement Overview Gedeo Zone (Snnpr)

    Displacement Overview Gedeo Zone (Snnpr)

    DISPLACEMENT OVERVIEW GEDEO ZONE (SNNPR) SITE LEVEL ASSESSMENT 12 - 18 JULY 2018 KEY SITE INFORMATION KEY IDP INFORMATION 23 Spontaneous Camps 134 106 Collective Centres 4 Completely Inaccesible Sites Total Collective Sites 276,939 1 Dispersed Settlements 130 Total Displaced People In Collective Sites 19 Inaccesible Sites By Car 44,005 Collective Sites Assessed 123 Collective Sites with SMC Total Displaced Households In Collective Sites 127 Collective Sites with SMA Sidama Hadiya Arsi KTAlaba DEMOGRAPHICS Dila Town Sidama Hadiya ! Dila Town Wolayita West Arsi Population Location IDPs D!ila Zuria Sidama Abaya ÔÔ Bale Population in collective centres 217,971 Wenago Ô Gamo GofaGedio Bule Guji Population in spontaneous camps 58,518 ! Ô West Guji Abaya Yirgachefe Town Borena Liben Population in dispersed settlements 450 ! Dila Zuria ÔÔ Yirgachefe Ô Origins Zone Woreda Ô Ô ! Wenago Bule Ô Origin of the largest IDP group West Guji Kerca Ô Kochere ! Ô WGeestd eGbuji Ô Gelana MOBILITY Kercha Month of arrival Sites at which IDPs ÔÔ Yirgachefe Bule Hora Ô Ô Ô of the first IDP group March intend to return ÔÔ Yirgachefe Town Gedeo ÔÔ 116 Ô Ô Guji Ô Ô Gelana ÔÔ Ô Ô Month of arrival Time Frame Ô July ÔÔ Legend of the last IDP group Unknown Displaced individuals Ô Ô ÔKochere ÔÔ Collective sites (includes spontaneous ÔÔÔ Ô ÔÔ Ô ! 7,705 - 10,000 ÔÔÔ ÔÔ camps and collective centers) ÔÔ Ô Ô Displaced individuals (from Sites) SHELTER* Key Shelter Indicators ! 10,001 - 50,000 Ô Ô 7,705 - 10,000 Sites where >50% households living outside/open spaces 7 50,001 - 100,000 Ô Ô ! ÔÔÔÔ Ô ÔÔ ÔÔ ÔÔÔ Hambela Wamena ÔÔÔÔ Ô ÔÔÔ 10,001 - 50,000 Sites where >50% households living in permanent shelter 67 ! 100,001 - 129,629 West Guji Gedeb 50,001 - 100,000 Ô Kercha Sites where >50% households in below standard shelters 18 Ô This map is for illustration purposes only.
  • World Bank Document

    World Bank Document

    Sample Procurement Plan (Text in italic font is meant for instruction to staff and should be deleted in the final version of the PP) Public Disclosure Authorized (This is only a sample with the minimum content that is required to be included in the PAD. The detailed procurement plan is still mandatory for disclosure on the Bank’s website in accordance with the guidelines. The initial procurement plan will cover the first 18 months of the project and then updated annually or earlier as necessary). I. General 1. Bank’s approval Date of the procurement Plan: Updated Procurement Plan, M 2. Date of General Procurement Notice: Dec 24, 2006 Public Disclosure Authorized 3. Period covered by this procurement plan: The procurement period of project covered from year June 2010 to December 2012 II. Goods and Works and non-consulting services. 1. Prior Review Threshold: Procurement Decisions subject to Prior Review by the Bank as stated in Appendix 1 to the Guidelines for Procurement: [Thresholds for applicable procurement methods (not limited to the list below) will be determined by the Procurement Specialist /Procurement Accredited Staff based on the assessment of the implementing agency’s capacity.] Public Disclosure Authorized Procurement Method Prior Review Comments Threshold US$ 1. ICB and LIB (Goods) Above US$ 500,000 All 2. NCB (Goods) Above US$ 100,000 First contract 3. ICB (Works) Above US$ 15 million All 4. NCB (Works) Above US$ 5 million All 5. (Non-Consultant Services) Below US$ 100,000 First contract [Add other methods if necessary] 2. Prequalification. Bidders for _Not applicable_ shall be prequalified in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 2.9 and 2.10 of the Public Disclosure Authorized Guidelines.
  • Oromia Region Administrative Map(As of 27 March 2013)

    Oromia Region Administrative Map(As of 27 March 2013)

    ETHIOPIA: Oromia Region Administrative Map (as of 27 March 2013) Amhara Gundo Meskel ! Amuru Dera Kelo ! Agemsa BENISHANGUL ! Jangir Ibantu ! ! Filikilik Hidabu GUMUZ Kiremu ! ! Wara AMHARA Haro ! Obera Jarte Gosha Dire ! ! Abote ! Tsiyon Jars!o ! Ejere Limu Ayana ! Kiremu Alibo ! Jardega Hose Tulu Miki Haro ! ! Kokofe Ababo Mana Mendi ! Gebre ! Gida ! Guracha ! ! Degem AFAR ! Gelila SomHbo oro Abay ! ! Sibu Kiltu Kewo Kere ! Biriti Degem DIRE DAWA Ayana ! ! Fiche Benguwa Chomen Dobi Abuna Ali ! K! ara ! Kuyu Debre Tsige ! Toba Guduru Dedu ! Doro ! ! Achane G/Be!ret Minare Debre ! Mendida Shambu Daleti ! Libanos Weberi Abe Chulute! Jemo ! Abichuna Kombolcha West Limu Hor!o ! Meta Yaya Gota Dongoro Kombolcha Ginde Kachisi Lefo ! Muke Turi Melka Chinaksen ! Gne'a ! N!ejo Fincha!-a Kembolcha R!obi ! Adda Gulele Rafu Jarso ! ! ! Wuchale ! Nopa ! Beret Mekoda Muger ! ! Wellega Nejo ! Goro Kulubi ! ! Funyan Debeka Boji Shikute Berga Jida ! Kombolcha Kober Guto Guduru ! !Duber Water Kersa Haro Jarso ! ! Debra ! ! Bira Gudetu ! Bila Seyo Chobi Kembibit Gutu Che!lenko ! ! Welenkombi Gorfo ! ! Begi Jarso Dirmeji Gida Bila Jimma ! Ketket Mulo ! Kersa Maya Bila Gola ! ! ! Sheno ! Kobo Alem Kondole ! ! Bicho ! Deder Gursum Muklemi Hena Sibu ! Chancho Wenoda ! Mieso Doba Kurfa Maya Beg!i Deboko ! Rare Mida ! Goja Shino Inchini Sululta Aleltu Babile Jimma Mulo ! Meta Guliso Golo Sire Hunde! Deder Chele ! Tobi Lalo ! Mekenejo Bitile ! Kegn Aleltu ! Tulo ! Harawacha ! ! ! ! Rob G! obu Genete ! Ifata Jeldu Lafto Girawa ! Gawo Inango ! Sendafa Mieso Hirna
  • Demography and Health

    Demography and Health

    SNNPR Southern Nations Nationalities and Peoples Demography and Health Aynalem Adugna, July 2014 www.EthioDemographyAndHealth.Org 2 SNNPR is one of the largest regions in Ethiopia, accounting for more than 10 percent of the country’s land area [1]. The mid-2008 population is estimated at nearly 16,000,000; almost a fifth of the country’s population. With less than one in tenth of its population (8.9%) living in urban areas in 2008 the region is overwhelmingly rural. "The region is divided into 13 administrative zones, 133 Woredas and 3512 Kebeles, and its capital is Awassa." [1] "The SNNPR is an extremely ethnically diverse region of Ethiopia, inhabited by more than 80 ethnic groups, of which over 45 (or 56 percent) are indigenous to the region (CSA 1996). These ethnic groups are distinguished by different languages, cultures, and socioeconomic organizations. Although none of the indigenous ethnic groups dominates the ethnic makeup of the national population, there is a considerable ethnic imbalance within the region. The largest ethnic groups in the SNNPR are the Sidama (17.6 percent), Wolayta (11.7 percent), Gurage (8.8 percent), Hadiya (8.4 percent), Selite (7.1 percent), Gamo (6.7 percent), Keffa (5.3 percent), Gedeo (4.4 percent), and Kembata (4.3 percent) …. While the Sidama are the largest ethnic group in the region, each ethnic group is numerically dominant in its respective administrative zone, and there are large minority ethnic groups in each zone. The languages spoken in the SNNPR can be classified into four linguistic families: Cushitic, Nilotic, Omotic, and Semitic.
  • (Coffea Arabica L.) Quality Determining Factors in Gedeo Zone, Southern Ethiopia

    (Coffea Arabica L.) Quality Determining Factors in Gedeo Zone, Southern Ethiopia

    Vol. 14(28), pp. 1216-1228, 11 July, 2019 DOI: 10.5897/AJAR2019.14116 Article Number: CE6D21861350 ISSN: 1991-637X Copyright ©2019 African Journal of Agricultural Author(s) retain the copyright of this article http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR Research Full Length Research Paper Assessment of pre and post-harvest management practices on coffee (Coffea arabica L.) quality determining factors in Gedeo zone, Southern Ethiopia Kidist Teshome1, Zerihun Girma2 and Biniam Eshetu3* 1Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture and Natural Resource, Dilla University, Dilla Ethiopia. 2Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture and Natural Resource, Dilla University, Dilla Ethiopia. 3 Department of Agricultural Economics, College of Agriculture and Natural Resource, Dilla University, Dilla Ethiopia. Received 17 April, 2019; Accepted 7 June, 2019 In Gedeo zone, coffee quality is declining from time to time due to several improper pre and post- harvest management practices. Therefore, this study was designed with the objective of assessing impact of pre and post-harvest management practices on Coffea arabica L. quality determining factors in Gedeo zone, Southern Ethiopia. Totally, 90 household respondents were used from three Woredas and selected purposively. Finally, quantitative data was analyzed by employing SPSS (version 20). In pre harvesting practices, the result indicated that most of the respondents owned old coffee trees (>20 years), prune their tree frequently within one year interval and observed various diseases on their coffee tree. According to the survey result, majority of farmers use shade trees, which is the most common cropping practiced by coffee producing farmers in the study area, and majority of the farmers use dry method of coffee processing.
  • Periodic Monitoring Report Working 2016 Humanitarian Requirements Document – Ethiopia Group

    Periodic Monitoring Report Working 2016 Humanitarian Requirements Document – Ethiopia Group

    DRMTechnical Periodic Monitoring Report Working 2016 Humanitarian Requirements Document – Ethiopia Group Covering 1 Jan to 31 Dec 2016 Prepared by Clusters and NDRMC Introduction The El Niño global climactic event significantly affected the 2015 meher/summer rains on the heels of failed belg/ spring rains in 2015, driving food insecurity, malnutrition and serious water shortages in many parts of the country. The Government and humanitarian partners issued a joint 2016 Humanitarian Requirements Document (HRD) in December 2015 requesting US$1.4 billion to assist 10.2 million people with food, health and nutrition, water, agriculture, shelter and non-food items, protection and emergency education responses. Following the delay and erratic performance of the belg/spring rains in 2016, a Prioritization Statement was issued in May 2016 with updated humanitarian requirements in nutrition (MAM), agriculture, shelter and non-food items and education.The Mid-Year Review of the HRD identified 9.7 million beneficiaries and updated the funding requirements to $1.2 billion. The 2016 HRD is 69 per cent funded, with contributions of $1.08 billion from international donors and the Government of Ethiopia (including carry-over resources from 2015). Under the leadership of the Government of Ethiopia delivery of life-saving and life- sustaining humanitarian assistance continues across the sectors. However, effective humanitarian response was challenged by shortage of resources, limited logistical capacities and associated delays, and weak real-time information management. This Periodic Monitoring Report (PMR) provides a summary of the cluster financial inputs against outputs and achievements against cluster objectives using secured funding since the launch of the 2016 HRD.
  • Ethiopia Administrative Map As of 2013

    Ethiopia Administrative Map As of 2013

    (as of 27 March 2013) ETHIOPIA:Administrative Map R E Legend E R I T R E A North D Western \( Erob \ Tahtay Laelay National Capital Mereb Ahferom Gulomekeda Adiyabo Adiyabo Leke Central Ganta S Dalul P Afeshum Saesie Tahtay Laelay Adwa E P Tahtay Tsaedaemba Regional Capital Kafta Maychew Maychew Koraro Humera Asgede Werei Eastern A Leke Hawzen Tsimbila Medebay Koneba Zana Kelete Berahle Western Atsbi International Boundary Welkait Awelallo Naeder Tigray Wenberta Tselemti Adet Kola Degua Tsegede Temben Mekele Temben P Zone 2 Undetermined Boundary Addi Tselemt Tanqua Afdera Abergele Enderta Arekay Ab Ala Tsegede Beyeda Mirab Armacho Debark Hintalo Abergele Saharti Erebti Regional Boundary Wejirat Tach Samre Megale Bidu Armacho Dabat Janamora Alaje Lay Sahla Zonal Boundary Armacho Wegera Southern Ziquala Metema Sekota Endamehoni Raya S U D A N North Wag Azebo Chilga Yalo Amhara East Ofla Teru Woreda Boundary Gonder West Belesa Himra Kurri Gonder Dehana Dembia Belesa Zuria Gaz Alamata Zone 4 Quara Gibla Elidar Takusa I Libo Ebenat Gulina Lake Kemkem Bugna Kobo Awra Afar T Lake Tana Lasta Gidan (Ayna) Zone 1 0 50 100 200 km Alfa Ewa U Fogera North Farta Lay Semera ¹ Meket Guba Lafto Semen Gayint Wollo P O Dubti Jawi Achefer Bahir Dar East Tach Wadla Habru Chifra B G U L F O F A D E N Delanta Aysaita Creation date:27 Mar.2013 P Dera Esite Gayint I Debub Bahirdar Ambasel Dawunt Worebabu Map Doc Name:21_ADM_000_ETH_032713_A0 Achefer Zuria West Thehulederie J Dangura Simada Tenta Sources:CSA (2007 population census purpose) and Field Pawe Mecha
  • Damage and Loss Assessment EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

    Damage and Loss Assessment EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

    Damage and Loss Assessment EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Damage and Loss Assessment EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The University of Dilla conducted a Damage When the situation stabilized, people have and Loss Assessment (DaLA) in four started to return with Yirgacheffe woreda woredas of Gedeo zone (Yirgachaffe, having the highest proportion of household Kochore-Gedeb, Kochore and Wonago) that returnees 3,854 (46.7%), followed by were affected by conflicts in Gedeo and Guji Kochore-Gedeb 2,835 (34.3%), Kochore 1, in 2018 that resulted in mass displacement 471 (17.8%) and Wonago101 (1.2%). of people from the two Zones. Despite a long history of a harmonious relationship between Gedeo Zone | Returnees by Woreda | the Gedeo and Guji communities, people 8,261 HH 46.65% from the two groups entered into inter- 34.32% communal conflict along their common borders- Gedeo (SNNPR) and West Guji 17.81% (Oromia) regions in April 2018. In the four 1.22% woredas in Gedeo zone, 60,681 people from Yirga Chefe Kochere Kochere Wenago Gedeb 8,261 households with an average family size of 7.35 persons, were adversely In addition to internal displacement, the affected by the conflict. conflict resulted in damage and loss in agriculture and livestock, private houses, household assets, public buildings, social Private Houses damaged | Cost of Repair infrastructure, and other properties and assets, that have adversely affected the Fully damaged livelihoods of the people. 7,098 (ETB 249M) Partially 1,043 This project is, therefore, designed- in damaged (ETB 17M) collaboration with Dilla University, UNHCR, Severely and National Disaster Risk Management 64 damaged (ETB 3M) Commission (NDRMC) of Ethiopia- in order to generate a comprehensive assessment of The estimated loss associated with private the extent of loss and damage caused by the houses is 19,408,800 ETB, which are conflict and provide financial estimates that projected expenses for clearing sites, are required to undertake a through recovery transportation and labor costs.
  • The Case of Yirgachefe District, Gedeo Zone, Souther

    The Case of Yirgachefe District, Gedeo Zone, Souther

    Global Journal of Science Frontier Research: D Agriculture and Veterinary Volume 19 Issue 5 Version 1.0 Year 2019 Type: Double Blind Peer Reviewed International Research Journal Publisher: Global Journals Online ISSN: 2249-4626 & Print ISSN: 0975-5896 Prospectives of Coffee Production and Marketing (The Value Chain Approach): The Case of Yirgachefe District, Gedeo Zone, Southern Nation Nationalities and Peoples Regional State, Ethiopia By Tizazu Toma Dilebo Southern Agricultural Research Institute Abstract- Coffee produced in Yirgachefe is internationally known as the rarest and most prized coffee, especially in America. But farmers in Yirgacheffe district complain that they are not benefited from the existing coffee supply, and half of the coffee supplied to Ethiopian Commodity Exchange(ECX) to be exported does not fulfill the quality criteria of ECX. These might be due to some technical and socio-economic factors. Thus this study was conducted to identify those determinants reducing the quality of Yirgachefe coffee. The general objective of this study was analyzing coffee value chain and Its specifics were to trace the value chain of Yirgachefee coffee AS-IS from input supply to consumption, to identify all the constraints that impede the competitiveness of coffee produced in Yirgachefe in the national & global market and to determine the role of actors in the coffee value chain for the intervention. Keywords: coffee producers, coffee value chain, ecx, coffee processing industries. GJSFR-D Classification: FOR Code: 070399 ProspectivesofCoffeeProductionandMarketingTheValueChainApproachTheCaseofYirgachefeDistrictGedeoZoneSouthernNationNationalitiesandPeoplesRegionalStateEthiopia Strictly as per the compliance and regulations of: © 2019. Tizazu Toma Dilebo. This is a research/review paper, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial 3.0 Unported License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), permitting all non commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.