Introduction Layers of the GI Tract
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more
Recommended publications
-
Te2, Part Iii
TERMINOLOGIA EMBRYOLOGICA Second Edition International Embryological Terminology FIPAT The Federative International Programme for Anatomical Terminology A programme of the International Federation of Associations of Anatomists (IFAA) TE2, PART III Contents Caput V: Organogenesis Chapter 5: Organogenesis (continued) Systema respiratorium Respiratory system Systema urinarium Urinary system Systemata genitalia Genital systems Coeloma Coelom Glandulae endocrinae Endocrine glands Systema cardiovasculare Cardiovascular system Systema lymphoideum Lymphoid system Bibliographic Reference Citation: FIPAT. Terminologia Embryologica. 2nd ed. FIPAT.library.dal.ca. Federative International Programme for Anatomical Terminology, February 2017 Published pending approval by the General Assembly at the next Congress of IFAA (2019) Creative Commons License: The publication of Terminologia Embryologica is under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-ND 4.0) license The individual terms in this terminology are within the public domain. Statements about terms being part of this international standard terminology should use the above bibliographic reference to cite this terminology. The unaltered PDF files of this terminology may be freely copied and distributed by users. IFAA member societies are authorized to publish translations of this terminology. Authors of other works that might be considered derivative should write to the Chair of FIPAT for permission to publish a derivative work. Caput V: ORGANOGENESIS Chapter 5: ORGANOGENESIS -
The Herbivore Digestive System Buffalo Zebra
The Herbivore Digestive System Name__________________________ Buffalo Ruminant: The purpose of the digestion system is to ______________________________ _____________________________. Bacteria help because they can digest __________________, a sugar found in the cell walls of________________. Zebra Non- Ruminant: What is the name for the largest section of Organ Color Key a ruminant’s Mouth stomach? Esophagus __________ Stomach Small Intestine Cecum Large Intestine Background Information for the Teacher Two Strategies of Digestion in Hoofed Mammals Ruminant Non‐ruminant Representative species Buffalo, cows, sheep, goats, antelope, camels, Zebra, pigs, horses, asses, hippopotamus, rhinoceros giraffes, deer Does the animal Yes, regurgitation No regurgitation regurgitate its cud to Grass is better prepared for digestion, as grinding Bacteria can not completely digest cell walls as chew material again? motion forms small particles fit for bacteria. material passes quickly through, so stool is fibrous. Where in the system do At the beginning, in the rumen Near the end, in the cecum you find the bacteria This first chamber of its four‐part stomach is In this sac between the two intestines, bacteria digest that digest cellulose? large, and serves to store food between plant material, the products of which pass to the rumination and as site of digestion by bacteria. bloodstream. How would you Higher Nutrition Lower Nutrition compare the nutrition Reaps benefits of immediately absorbing the The digestive products made by the bacteria are obtained via digestion? products of bacterial digestion, such as sugars produced nearer the end of the line, after the small and vitamins, via the small intestine. intestine, the classic organ of nutrient absorption. -
Respiratory System
Respiratory system Department of Histology and Embryology of Jilin university ----Jiang Wenhua 1. General description z the nose, the pharynx, the larynx, the trachea, bronchus, lung zFunction: inspiring oxygen, expiring carbon dioxide The lung synthesises many materials 2.Trachea and bronchi General structure mucosa submucosa adventitia The trachea is a thin-walled tube about 11centimeters long and 2 centimeters in diameter, with a somewhat flattened posterior shape. The wall of the trachea is composed of three layers: mucosa, submucosa, and adventitia 2.1 mucosa 2.1.1 pseudostratified ciliated columnar epithelium 2.1.1.1 ciliated columnar cells These cells are columnar in shape with a centrally –located oval –shaped nucleus, on the free surface of the cells are microvilli and cilia, which regularly sweep toward the pharynx to remove inspired dust particles 2.1.1.2 brush cells These cells are columnar in shape with a round or oval –shaped nucleus located in the basal portion. on the free surface the microvilli are arranged into the shape of a brush. These cells are considered to be a type of under-developed ciliated columnar cell Schematic drawing of the trachea mucosa Scanning electron micrographs of the surface of mucosa Schematic drawing of the trachea mucosa 2.1.1.3 goblet cells secrete mucus to lubricate and protect the epithelium Schematic drawing of the trachea mucosa 2.1.1.4 basal cells These cells are cone –shaped and situated in the deep layer of the epithelium. Their apices are not exposed to the lumen, and their nuclei are round in shape, such cells constitute a variety of undifferentiated cells 2.1.1.5 small granular cells These cells are a kind of endocrine cells . -
The Oesophagus Lined with Gastric Mucous Membrane by P
Thorax: first published as 10.1136/thx.8.2.87 on 1 June 1953. Downloaded from Thorax (1953), 8, 87. THE OESOPHAGUS LINED WITH GASTRIC MUCOUS MEMBRANE BY P. R. ALLISON AND A. S. JOHNSTONE Leeds (RECEIVED FOR PUBLICATION FEBRUARY 26, 1953) Peptic oesophagitis and peptic ulceration of the likely to find its way into the museum. The result squamous epithelium of the oesophagus are second- has been that pathologists have been describing ary to regurgitation of digestive juices, are most one thing and clinicians another, and they have commonly found in those patients where the com- had the same name. The clarification of this point petence ofthecardia has been lost through herniation has been so important, and the description of a of the stomach into the mediastinum, and have gastric ulcer in the oesophagus so confusing, that been aptly named by Barrett (1950) " reflux oeso- it would seem to be justifiable to refer to the latter phagitis." In the past there has been some dis- as Barrett's ulcer. The use of the eponym does not cussion about gastric heterotopia as a cause of imply agreement with Barrett's description of an peptic ulcer of the oesophagus, but this point was oesophagus lined with gastric mucous membrane as very largely settled when the term reflux oesophagitis " stomach." Such a usage merely replaces one was coined. It describes accurately in two words confusion by another. All would agree that the the pathology and aetiology of a condition which muscular tube extending from the pharynx down- is a common cause of digestive disorder. -
Mouth Esophagus Stomach Rectum and Anus Large Intestine Small
1 Liver The liver produces bile, which aids in digestion of fats through a dissolving process known as emulsification. In this process, bile secreted into the small intestine 4 combines with large drops of liquid fat to form Healthy tiny molecular-sized spheres. Within these spheres (micelles), pancreatic enzymes can break down fat (triglycerides) into free fatty acids. Pancreas Digestion The pancreas not only regulates blood glucose 2 levels through production of insulin, but it also manufactures enzymes necessary to break complex The digestive system consists of a long tube (alimen- 5 carbohydrates down into simple sugars (sucrases), tary canal) that varies in shape and purpose as it winds proteins into individual amino acids (proteases), and its way through the body from the mouth to the anus fats into free fatty acids (lipase). These enzymes are (see diagram). The size and shape of the digestive tract secreted into the small intestine. varies in each individual (e.g., age, size, gender, and disease state). The upper part of the GI tract includes the mouth, throat (pharynx), esophagus, and stomach. The lower Gallbladder part includes the small intestine, large intestine, The gallbladder stores bile produced in the liver appendix, and rectum. While not part of the alimentary 6 and releases it into the duodenum in varying canal, the liver, pancreas, and gallbladder are all organs concentrations. that are vital to healthy digestion. 3 Small Intestine Mouth Within the small intestine, millions of tiny finger-like When food enters the mouth, chewing breaks it 4 protrusions called villi, which are covered in hair-like down and mixes it with saliva, thus beginning the first 5 protrusions called microvilli, aid in absorption of of many steps in the digestive process. -
Common Bile-Duct Mucosa in Choledochoduodenostomy Patients--- Histological and Histochemical Study
HPB Surgery 1988, Vol. 1, pp. 15-20 (C) 1988 Harwood Academic Publishers GmbH Reprints available directly from the publisher Printed in Great Britain Photocopying permitted by license only COMMON BILE-DUCT MUCOSA IN CHOLEDOCHODUODENOSTOMY PATIENTS--- HISTOLOGICAL AND HISTOCHEMICAL STUDY E. ELEFTHERIADIS*, V. TZIOUFA 1, K. KOTZAMPASSI and H. ALETRAS Departments of Surgery and Pathology1, University of Thessaloniki, Greece We describe the histological and histochemical changes of the common bile-duct mucosa in specimens obtained by means of peroral cholangioscopy, 1-12 years after choledochoduodenal anastomosis. Our findings- hyperplasia of the superficial epithelium, metaplastic goblet cells containing predominantly acid sialomucins, and pyloric-like gland formation containing neutral mucins- express a morphological and functional differentiation of the common bile-duct mucosa that probably facilitates its survival in a different environment. We consider that these adaptive changes may explain the uneventful long-term postoperative period of choledochoduodenostomized patients. KEY WORDS" Common bile duct, choledochoduodenal anastomosis, adaptation, peroral cholangio- scopy. INTRODUCTION After choledochoduodenal anastomosis (CDA), the common bile-duct mucosa (CBDM) is exposed to a different environment, no longer being protected by the sphincter of Oddi. Although, theoretically, this new environment i.e. gastric acid and food flowing through the anastomosis- should affect it, both clinical practice and experimental data have shown no evidence -
Evidence Vs Experience in the Surgical Management of Necrotizing Enterocolitis and Focal Intestinal Perforation
Journal of Perinatology (2008) 28, S14–S17 r 2008 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved. 0743-8346/08 $30 www.nature.com/jp ORIGINAL ARTICLE Evidence vs experience in the surgical management of necrotizing enterocolitis and focal intestinal perforation CJ Hunter1,2, N Chokshi1,2 and HR Ford1,2 1Department of Surgery, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA and 2Department of Surgery, Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA bacterial colonization and prematurity.4 There is a subset of low Introduction: Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and focal intestinal birth weight infants, however, that sustain focal intestinal perforation (FIP) are neonatal intestinal emergencies that affect premature perforation (FIP) without classic clinical, radiographic, or infants. Although most cases of early NEC can be successfully managed with histological evidence of NEC.5 FIP appears to be a distinct clinical medical therapy, prompt surgical intervention is often required for advanced entity that occurs in 3% of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants or perforated NEC and FIP. and accounts for 44% of gastrointestinal perforations in this 6 Method: The surgical management and treatment of FIP and NEC are population. Optimal surgical management of severe NEC and discussed on the basis of literature review and our personal experience. FIP has been the subject of ongoing controversy for many years. Result: Surgical options are diverse, and include peritoneal drainage, laparotomy with diverting ostomy alone, laparotomy with intestinal Presentation of NEC and FIP resection and primary anastomosis or stoma creation, with or without Infants with NEC typically present with feeding intolerance and second-look procedures. -
Park University Clery Annual Security Report
PA RK U N I V E R S I T Y CLERY ANNUAL SECURITY REPORT 2017 ARKANSAS • Little Rock AFB 2017 SPECIAL MESSAGE FROM PARK UNIVERSITY DIRECTOR OF CAMPUS SAFETY Each year, in compliance with the Jeanne Clery Disclosure of Campus Safety Policy and Campus Crime Statistics Act, Park University publishes the Park University Security and Fire Safety Report. This document, posted online at park.edu and distributed via hard copy upon request, provides local crime statistics, details the University’s regulations and procedures for emergency response, and lists on- and off- campus resources for safety assistance. Although all colleges and universities participating in federal financial aid programs are required to share this data with the public, we provide it with intention beyond simply obeying the rules and hope that doing so demonstrates Park’s commitment to the well-being of students, faculty and staff members, business tenants and visitors. The annual production of the Report is just one element of our larger, sustained strategy around security and safety. In 2017, we have taken measures to promote a safe and desirable college experience for all students, faculty and staff by implementing contingency plans for incidents such as active shooter and bomb threat through cooperative training with local police, fire and ambulance services. The Park University Department of Campus Safety is proud to help foster a safe University environment that is conducive to collaboration, development and growth for all who live, learn and work on Park’s campuses. Thank you for your interest in our processes and outcomes. Sincerely, Will London Director of Campus Safety, Park University [email protected] 1 Founded in 1875 in Parkville, Mo., a suburb of Kansas City, Park University has developed into a comprehensive, independent institution that is a national leader in higher education. -
Ost , Is Essential for Intestinal Bile Acid Transport and Homeostasis
The organic solute transporter ␣-, Ost␣-Ost, is essential for intestinal bile acid transport and homeostasis Anuradha Rao*, Jamie Haywood*, Ann L. Craddock*, Martin G. Belinsky†, Gary D. Kruh‡, and Paul A. Dawson*§ *Department of Internal Medicine, Section on Gastroenterology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston–Salem, NC 27157; †Medical Science Division, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111; and ‡Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL 60612 Communicated by David W. Russell, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, December 28, 2007 (received for review November 28, 2007) The apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter (Asbt) is respon- Ost␣-Ost efficiently transports the major species of bile acids sible for transport across the intestinal brush border membrane; when expressed in transfected cells (3, 4); and (iv) expression of however, the carrier(s) responsible for basolateral bile acid export Ost␣ and Ost mRNA is positively regulated via the bile into the portal circulation remains to be determined. Although the acid-activated nuclear receptor farnesoid X receptor (FXR) heteromeric organic solute transporter Ost␣-Ost exhibits many (6–9), thereby providing a mechanism to ensure efficient export properties predicted for a candidate intestinal basolateral bile acid of bile acids and protection against their cytotoxic accumulation. transporter, the in vivo functions of Ost␣-Ost have not been Although these data are consistent with a role in bile acid investigated. To determine the role of Ost␣-Ost in intestinal bile transport, the in vivo functions of Ost␣-Ost have not been acid absorption, the Ost␣ gene was disrupted by homologous investigated. -
2020 DEPARTMENT of PUBLIC SAFETY Annual Security Report
WEBSTER UNIVERSITY 2020 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY Annual Security Report Little Rock Metro Campus QUICK REFERENCE RESOURCES Emergency Contacts Emergency 911 Little Rock Police Dept. (non-emergency) 501-371-4829 Webster University – Little Rock Metro 501-375-1511 Webster University Department of Public Safety 314-246-7430 (non-emergency) Sexual Offense Advocate (main campus) 314-649-8474 (24 hours a day) The Department of Public Safety and Sexual Offense Advocate are located on the main campus in Webster Groves, Missouri; however, staff members can assist callers remotely or make appropriate referrals to local resources. Webster Alert System This is the University’s free mass notification service which is used to alert all students, faculty & staff regarding important information regarding campus crimes, emergencies and other potentially life threatening events at their webster.edu email address. Users are strongly encouraged to add a personal email address and mobile number to their account by logging into Connections and clicking on the Webster Alerts banner. The following telephone numbers connect callers with personnel at the main campus; however, staff and administrators at the main campus can either assist callers at branch campuses remotely or make appropriate local referrals. University Title IX Coordinator University Title IX Coordinator 314-246-7780 Other Campus Resources Dean of Students Office 314-968-6980 Academic Resource Center 314-246-7620 Financial Aid Office 314-968-6992 Counseling Services 314-968-7030 Immigration/Visa Information 314-246-7860 Webster University 2020 Annual Security Report – LITTLE ROCK METRO 1 LITTLE ROCK METRO CAMPUS ANNUAL CRIME STATISTICS This section of the Annual Security Report explains what type of crimes institutions are directed to include under the Clery Act, as well as how the University obtains and tabulates these statistics each year. -
Exploratory Laparotomy.Docx
EXPLORATORY LAPAROTOMY CONSENT FORM Your physician has determined that you may have a disease or abnormality inside your abdomen which may be life threatening, preventing pregnancy or causing medical problems if not treated. An exploratory laparotomy is an operation in which the doctor makes a surgical “cut” in the belly. Sometimes this operation is done to make sure that no disease or abnormality exists. If the physician finds that a disease is found or if the physician doesn’t feel that corrective surgery should be done immediately, then he will close up the surgical cut. If major corrective surgery is done the risk will be greater than if no corrective surgery is done. It is possible that you will be worse after the operation. Your physician can make no guarantee as to the result that might be obtained from this operation. Complications from exploratory surgery of the abdomen without any corrective surgery are infrequent, but they do occur. As with any surgical procedure, complications from bleeding and infection can occur. These complications can result in prolonged illness, the need for blood transfusions, poor healing wounds, scarring and the need for further operations. Other uncommon complications of this operation include: Damage to the intestines, blocked bowels, hernia or “rupture” developing at the site of the surgical cut, heart attacks or stroke, blood clots in the lungs and pneumonia. Some complications of exploratory surgery of the abdomen may require further surgery, some can cause permanent deformity and rarely, some can even be fatal. Furthermore, there may be alternative therapeutic or diagnostic methods available to you in addition to exploratory surgery. -
Does Your Patient Have Bile Acid Malabsorption?
NUTRITION ISSUES IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, SERIES #198 NUTRITION ISSUES IN GASTROENTEROLOGY, SERIES #198 Carol Rees Parrish, MS, RDN, Series Editor Does Your Patient Have Bile Acid Malabsorption? John K. DiBaise Bile acid malabsorption is a common but underrecognized cause of chronic watery diarrhea, resulting in an incorrect diagnosis in many patients and interfering and delaying proper treatment. In this review, the synthesis, enterohepatic circulation, and function of bile acids are briefly reviewed followed by a discussion of bile acid malabsorption. Diagnostic and treatment options are also provided. INTRODUCTION n 1967, diarrhea caused by bile acids was We will first describe bile acid synthesis and first recognized and described as cholerhetic enterohepatic circulation, followed by a discussion (‘promoting bile secretion by the liver’) of disorders causing bile acid malabsorption I 1 enteropathy. Despite more than 50 years since (BAM) including their diagnosis and treatment. the initial report, bile acid diarrhea remains an underrecognized and underappreciated cause of Bile Acid Synthesis chronic diarrhea. One report found that only 6% Bile acids are produced in the liver as end products of of British gastroenterologists investigate for bile cholesterol metabolism. Bile acid synthesis occurs acid malabsorption (BAM) as part of the first-line by two pathways: the classical (neutral) pathway testing in patients with chronic diarrhea, while 61% via microsomal cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase consider the diagnosis only in selected patients (CYP7A1), or the alternative (acidic) pathway via or not at all.2 As a consequence, many patients mitochondrial sterol 27-hydroxylase (CYP27A1). are diagnosed with other causes of diarrhea or The classical pathway, which is responsible for are considered to have irritable bowel syndrome 90-95% of bile acid synthesis in humans, begins (IBS) or functional diarrhea by exclusion, thereby with 7α-hydroxylation of cholesterol catalyzed interfering with and delaying proper treatment.