DOCSLIB.ORG

The Meaning of Life”

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Meaning of Life” Filosofia Unisinos Unisinos Journal of Philosophy 20(2):146-154, may/aug 2019 Unisinos – doi: 10.4013/fsu.2019.202.04 On the meaning of “the meaning of life” Sobre o significado do “sentido da vida” Tufan Kıymaz1 ABSTRACT When it comes to a question as notoriously unclear as “What is the meaning of life?”, clarifying the question and its conceptual setting is a necessary step before attempting to answer the question. The analysis of the concept of “the meaning of life” is a twofold task; “the meaning” and “life” both need to be examined. In this paper, I primarily focus on “the meaning.” I argue that, although there is much disagreement and confusion in the literature about the meaning of “the meaning” as it is applied to life, there is one most plausible interpretation of this notion. In the end, even though I do not answer the question of the meaning of life, I propose an account of what a correct answer to the question is supposed to look like, based on my original function analysis of “the meaning”. Keywords: the meaning of life, meaningfulness, meaning in life. RESUMO No tocante a uma questão notoriamente pouco clara como “Qual é o sentido da vida?”, esclarecer a questão e seu marco conceitual é um passo necessário antes de tentar respon- dê-la. A análise do conceito “o sentido da vida” implica uma tarefa dupla: tanto “o sentido” quanto “vida” precisam ser examinados. Neste artigo, enfoco primordialmente o termo “o sentido”. Sustento que, embora haja muita divergência e confusão na literatura sobre o significado de “o sentido” quando este termo é aplicado à vida, há uma interpretação mais plausível dessa noção. No fim, embora não respondendo a questão do sentido da vida, apresento uma proposta de como poderia ser uma resposta correta a essa questão, com base em minha análise da função original de “o sentido”. Palavras-chave: o sentido da vida, significatividade, sentido na vida. 1 Bilkent University, Department of Philosophy. H249, Bilkent, Ankara 06800, Turkey. Email: tufankiy- This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC [email protected]. BY 4.0), which permits reproduction, adaptation, and distribution provided the original author and source are credited. On the meaning of “the meaning of life” To many who are not professional philosophers, “What worthwhile?” “Does (or can) human life have any meaning?” is the meaning of life?” is the paradigm philosophical ques- (Edwards, 2000, p. 133); “What is it all for?” “Why am I here?” tion; however, partly because of its apparent unclarity, this “What is the point of it all?” (Britton, 1969, p. 3); “Does life question does not receive as much attention from academia have a purpose or point?” “Does life have some value?” “Does as is supposed in popular culture. Clarifying this question and my life signify something?” (Thomson, 2003, p. 12); “Why its conceptual setting is a necessary step before attempting to live?” “Why is life worth living?” (Thagard, 2010, p. 1, 3); and answer it. The analysis of the concept of “the meaning of life” many other variations. is a twofold task; “the meaning” and “life” both need to be ex- From the above interpretations, we can identify some amined. In this paper, I primarily focus on “the meaning.” I concepts that are regarded to be closely related, even identical, argue that, although there is much disagreement and confu- to the meaning of life, such as the purpose of life, what makes sion in the literature about the meaning of “the meaning” as life valuable/worthwhile, and the reason/explanation of life. it is applied to life, there is one most plausible interpretation We also see that some interpretations of QML are about the of this notion. existence of human life in general, some are about the life of In the first section, I briefly explore some of the inter- the person who asks the question, and some are about exis- pretations of the question “What is the meaning of life?” tence in its entirety. Most importantly, some questions in the 2 (hereafter QML) and the answers given in the philosophical list are descriptive/explanatory and some are normative . literature. In the second section, I discuss interpretive strate- Let us now briefly survey the answers given to QML gies for handling the apparent ambiguity of QML. In the third in the literature, which will help us better understand about and the fourth sections, I examine two concepts, namely the what different philosophers take the question to be. Accord- psychological meaning in life and the meaningfulness of life, ing to Metz (2001, 2002, 2007, 2013a, 2013b) and Seachris and point out the ways in which they are distinct from (2011), supernaturalism, subjective naturalism, and objective the naturalism are the standard categories of answers given to the meaning of life (hereafter ML) and the ways in which they are confused with ML in the literature. In the fifth section, I pro- normative versions of QML. pose and defend my analysis of “the meaning.” Supernaturalistic theories are those that derive the original function meaning of life from God, from the soul, or from both. For In the end, even though I do not answer the question of the example, according to the “purpose theory,” what gives a life meaning of life, I propose an account of what a correct answer meaning is ac ing according to God’s purpose for that life to the question is supposed to look like, for any given sense of (Metz, 2002, p. 784-7; 2013b, p. 79-117; also see Metz, 2000). the term “life.” Another supernaturalistic theory is Robert Nozick’s “infinity theory.” Nozick argues that life can only be meaningful if it I. The meaning of life: questions is linked to an infinite being, because only an infinite being can be meaningful in itself (Metz, 2002, p. 788-789; Nozick, and answers 1989, p. 167). Similarly, Charles Hartshorne argues that a life can only be meaningful if there is a God who appreciates and Among the philosophers who offer answers to QML, immortalizes (by remembering/knowing) that life (Metz, there is no consensus on what the question is really about. 2002, p. 788). Some supernaturalistic theories emphasize the Here are some questions that are offered in the literature as importance of having an immortal soul. For example, accord- interpretations of QML. ing to “ultimate consequence theory,” life can be meaningful “What, if anything, makes a life meaningful?” (Metz, only if it makes a permanent difference and that is possible 2002, p. 781); “What is it all about?” “What is (are) the pur- only if life will not end (Metz, 2002, p. 789). pose(s) of life (my life)?” “What makes life valuable?” “What Subjective naturalistic theories assert that the meaning makes life worthwhile and not irredeemably futile?” “What of a person’s life consists in her subjective attitudes towards makes life significant?” “Does a particular life achieve a good life, such as setting one’s own purposes and following them, purpose?” “What makes life worth living?” (Seachris, 2011); loving something/someone, or engaging in creative ac ivities “What is the purpose of human existence?” “What should we (Metz, 2002, p. 793, 797). It is important to note that these seek?” “What ends (if any) are really worthwhile?” (Nielsen, so-called subjective naturalist theories are only subjective in 2000, p. 239, 246); “What is the use of a man’s life?” “Under the sense that they explain meaning in terms of subjective at- what conditions is a man’s life of some use?” (G. E. Moore, titudes, but, of course, if a subjective naturalist theory is true, quoted in Moorhead, 1988, p. 128), “Is human life ever then it is objectively true. For example, if the meaning of life is 2 I use the term “normative” in the wider sense. A statement/theory is normative if it states what one should or ought to do, or what is right and what is wrong, but I will also regard any evaluative statement/theory as normative. So, a normative statement/theory is any statement/theory that declares something is better. Furthermore, a concept F is normative if and only if the statement “x is F” implies either that x is better than something else or something is better than x. For example, “good,” “right,” “wrong,” “worthwhile” are normative concepts, and so is “meaningful.” A meaningful life is better than a meaningless life ceteris paribus. I will talk more about the normativity of the term “meaningful” in section 4. Filosofi a Unisinos – Unisinos Journal of Philosophy – 20(2):146-154, may/aug 2019 147 Tufan Kıymaz engaging in creative ac ivities, the preferred creative ac ivities ing to John Cottingham, when we ask about the meaning of would change from person to person, since the desirability of life “we are asking about our relationship with the rest of the an ac ivity is a subjective matter, but, if this theory is true, universe” (qtd. in Seachris, 2009, p. 5). then that one’s life is meaningful only if one engages in cre- Seachris argues that when we ask “What is the meaning ative ac ivities is an objective fact. of life?”, what we mean by “meaning” is what a father means Objective naturalistic theories state that a non-super- by “meaning” when he goes into his children’s playroom after natural objective/mind-independent component is necessary he hears screaming and yelling, finds the children fighting and for meaningfulness. For example, Susan Wolf (2010, 2015) asks in an authoritative manner “what is the meaning of this?” argues that, unless an ac ivity is objectively valuable, it can- (2009, p.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Life Without Meaning? Richard Norman
    17 Life Without Meaning? Richard Norman The Alpha Course, a well‐known evangelical Christian programme, advertises itself with posters displaying the words THE MEANING OF LIFE IS_________, followed by the invitation ‘Fill in the blanks at alpha.org’. Followers of the course will discover that ‘Men and women were created to live in a relationship with God’, and that ‘without that relationship there will always be a hunger, an emptiness, a feeling that something is missing’.1 We all have that need because we are all sinners, we are told, and the truth which will fill the need is that Jesus Christ died to save us from our sins. Not all Christian or other religious views about the meaning of life are as simplistic as this, but they typically share the assumptions that the meaning of life is to be found in some belief whose truth we need to recognize, and that this is a belief about the purpose for which we exist. A further implication is that this purpose is the purpose intended by the God who created us, and that if we fail to identify and live in accordance with that purpose, our lives will lack meaning. The assumption is echoed in the question many humanists will have encountered: if you don’t believe in a God, what’s the point of it all? And many people who don’t share the answer still accept the legitimacy of the question – ‘What is the meaning of life?’ – and assume that what we need is a correct belief, religious or non‐religious, which will fill the blank in the sentence ‘The meaning of life is …’.
    [Show full text]
  • Defending the Subjective Component of Susan Wolf's
    Defending the Subjective Component of Susan Wolf’s “Fitting Fulfillment View” About Meaning in Life. Andreas Hjälmarö Andreas Hjälmarö Kandidatuppsats Filosofi, 15 hp. Ht 2016 Handledare Frans Svensson Umeå Universitet, Umeå Table of content Abstract ................................................................................................................................................... 3 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Background ...................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 The question .................................................................................................................................. 5 2.2 Common answers .......................................................................................................................... 8 The nihilistic view ............................................................................................................................ 8 The super-naturalistic view ............................................................................................................. 8 The naturalistic view ....................................................................................................................... 9 2.3 Wolf’s view – a combination ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Search for Meaning of Life: Existentialism, Communication, and Islam
    The Search for 0eaning of Life: Existentialism, Communication, and ,slam 2. HasEiansyah ABSTRACT 0aNna merupaNan hal sangat penting dalam Nehidupan manusia. Tanpa maNna, Nehidupan aNan tanpa arah dan penuh Negelisahan. 0aNna hidup dapat dicari melalui nilai-nilai Nreatif, nilai-nilai pengalaman, nilai-nilai cara EersiNap, NomuniNasi dan partisipasi, pemahaman diri, dan pemahaman aNan aMaran agama. ,slam menawarNan aspeN nomatif Eagi pencapaian hidup EermaNn lewat pemEersihan diri, Nontemplasi, serta Nomitmen pada Neilmuan dan NemasyaraNatan. ,ntroduction was ever upset deeply, while he had a good posi- tion and future. He needed something else, that :e face our life every day. :e sleep, wake was a high meaningful life, which could make him up, eat, work, take part in communication, have a aEsolutely satisfied. He gave up all his position. rest, and so on. Events come to us and we pay Then, he was lost himself in a realm of mysticism attention to them, even involve ourselves in them, (tashawwuf). In this world, he felt a highest satis- or ignore them. In other cases, we need some- faction and a real significant life. thing, we seek it, we get it or not, then we feel At first glance it seems difficult to understand happy or sad. It takes place automatically and why, for instance, someone is very interested in routinely. :e are as though in a circle of situation. climEing up mountain, while another is pleased to However in reality, life is not as simple as that. contriEute most of his possession to others and Each of us is not always involved passively in a he chooses to lead an extremely soEer life.
    [Show full text]
  • The Three Meanings of Meaning in Life: Distinguishing Coherence, Purpose, and Significance
    The Journal of Positive Psychology Dedicated to furthering research and promoting good practice ISSN: 1743-9760 (Print) 1743-9779 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rpos20 The three meanings of meaning in life: Distinguishing coherence, purpose, and significance Frank Martela & Michael F. Steger To cite this article: Frank Martela & Michael F. Steger (2016) The three meanings of meaning in life: Distinguishing coherence, purpose, and significance, The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11:5, 531-545, DOI: 10.1080/17439760.2015.1137623 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2015.1137623 Published online: 27 Jan 2016. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 425 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rpos20 Download by: [Colorado State University] Date: 06 July 2016, At: 11:55 The Journal of Positive Psychology, 2016 Vol. 11, No. 5, 531–545, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2015.1137623 The three meanings of meaning in life: Distinguishing coherence, purpose, and significance Frank Martelaa* and Michael F. Stegerb,c aFaculty of Theology, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 4, Helsinki 00014, Finland; bDepartment of Psychology, Colorado State University, 1876 Campus Delivery, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1876, USA; cSchool of Behavioural Sciences, North-West University, Vanderbijlpark, South Africa (Received 25 June 2015; accepted 3 December 2015) Despite growing interest in meaning in life, many have voiced their concern over the conceptual refinement of the con- struct itself. Researchers seem to have two main ways to understand what meaning in life means: coherence and pur- pose, with a third way, significance, gaining increasing attention.
    [Show full text]
  • The No-Self View and the Meaning of Life Baptiste Le Bihan
    The No-Self View and the Meaning of Life Baptiste Le Bihan Philosophy East and West, Early Release Articles, (Article) Published by University of Hawai'i Press This is a preprint article. When the final version of this article launches, this URL will be automatically redirected. For additional information about this preprint article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/697321/summary Access provided by Universite de Geneve (7 Jun 2018 09:39 GMT) The No-Self View and the Meaning of Life Baptiste Le Bihan Department of philosophy, University of Geneva [email protected] I. Introduction Several philosophers, both in Buddhist philosophy (see e.g. Zahavi, Thompson, and Siderits 2011) and Western philosophy (Unger 1979a, 1979b, 1979c, Stone 2005) have claimed that the self does not exist. Such a claim may immediately be rejected because of the incredulous stares and the existential threatening it triggers. One might think that it is obvious that the self exists since one feels as though one does have a very direct access to one’s self. Or, alternatively, one may claim that if the self were to fail to exist then life would be meaningless–thereby perceiving the eliminativist claim as an existential threat. A lot has already been written about incredulous stares and the roles of experience-based intuitions in metaphysics (see for instance Korman 2009 and Benovsky 2015) so, within the scope of the paper, I shall only concern myself–so to speak–with the latter resistance, which has received far less attention. The no-self view (also called “eliminativism about the self”) might, intuitively, threaten not only our existence as a subject but also the very meaning of our lives.
    [Show full text]
  • What Does It Mean to Live a Fully Embodied Spiritual Life? Jorge N
    What Does It Mean to Live a Fully Embodied Spiritual Life? Jorge N. Ferrer1 California Institute of Integral Studies San Francisco, CA, USA This essay discusses the meaning of embodied spirituality—based on the integration of all human attributes, including the body and sexuality—and contrasts it with the disembodied spirituality—based on dissociation and/or sublimation—prevailing in human religious history. It then describes what it means to approach the body as a living partner with which to co-create one’s spiritual life, and outlines ten features of a fully embodied spirituality. The article concludes with some reflections about the past, present, and potential future of embodied spirituality. For in him the whole fullness of divinity dwells bodily. (Colossians 2:9) mbodied spirituality has become a buzzword in What Is Embodied Spirituality? contemporary spiritual circles, yet the concept n a way, the expression “embodied spirituality” can be has not been dealt with in a thorough manner. Irightfully seen as redundant and perhaps even hollow. EWhat do we really mean when we say that spirituality After all, is not all human spirituality “embodied” insofar is “embodied”? Is there a distinct understanding of the as it necessarily transpires in and through embodied body underlying this expression? What distinguishes men and women? Proponents of embodied spiritual “embodied” from “disembodied” spirituality in practice? practice, however, tell us that important trends of past What are the implications for spiritual practice and and present spiritualities are “disembodied.” But what spiritual goals—and for our very approach to spiritual does “disembodied” mean in this context? liberation—of taking embodiment seriously? In light of our spiritual history, I suggest that Before attempting to answer these questions, two “disembodied” does not denote that the body and caveats are in order.
    [Show full text]
  • God, the Meaning of Life, and a New Argument for Atheism
    Penultimate Draft. Please cite the version forthcoming in the International Journal for Philosophy of Religion. GOD, THE MEANING OF LIFE, AND A NEW ARGUMENT FOR ATHEISM Jason Megill and Daniel Linford ABSTRACT We raise various puzzles about the relationship between God (if God exists) and the meaning of life (if life has meaning). These difficulties suggest that, even if we assume that God exists, and even if (as we argue) God’s existence would entail that our lives have meaning, God is not and could not be the source of the meaning of life. We conclude by discussing implications of our ​ arguments: (i) these claims can be used in a novel argument for atheism; (ii) these claims undermine an extant argument for God’s existence; and (iii) they suggest that atheism is consistent with our lives having meaning. INTRODUCTION In the literature on the meaning of life over the last few decades, the “meaning of life” is generally taken to be some positive feature of an individual’s life that is distinct from (though perhaps related to) other positive features (wellbeing, happiness, etc.) that a life might or might not have. It is also typically thought that lives can have meaning to varying degrees, so e.g., one life might be more meaningful than another, or the same life might be more or less meaningful at different times. We follow these conventions.1 Some philosophers have endorsed the view that God is somehow the source of the meaning of life and moreover, God’s existence is necessary for life to have meaning.
    [Show full text]
  • Rudolf Eucken's Philsophy of Life
    RUDOLF EUCKEN’S PHILOSOPHY OF LIFE BY W. R. BOYCE GIBSON LECTURER IN PHILOSOPHY AT THE UNIVERSITY OF LONDON LONDON ADAM AND CHARLES BLACK 1906 PREFACE T he chapters in this book were originally delivered as inter-collegiate lectures at Westfield College, Uni­ versity of London, during the Michaelmas term, 1905. They arose out of the deep respect I feel for the work and personality of Professor Eucken, and from a profound sense of the importance of his teaching for philosophy, for religion, and for everyday life. In the publication of these lectures I have been most generously assisted by the Hibbert Trustees. My sincerest thanks are due to them, not only for the grant defraying the expenses of publication, but for their sympathetic recognition of the value of Professor Eucken’s work, and of the need for making it better known to English readers. I gratefully acknowledge the help given me by my wife in the typing of the manuscript and the reading of the proofs. I am also most indebted in this connec­ tion to Professor Eucken himself, who very kindly read through all the proof-sheets, and assisted me in many ways with the most unfailing cordiality and goodwill. CONTENTS CHAPTER I INTRODUCTORY— EUCKEN’S PHILOSOPHICAL PUBLICA­ TIONS— OUTLINE SKETCH OF THE NEW IDEALISM, WITH PRELIMINARY APPRECIATION AND CRITICISM— EUCKEN’S PHILOSOPHY A RALLYING-POINT FOR IDEALISTIC EFFORT— THE SOLIDARITY OF IDEALISM 1 -2 1 CHAPTER II e u c k e n ’s v i e w s o n t h e r e l a t i o n o f p h il o s o p h y t o HISTORY, PARTICULARLY TO THE HISTORY OF PHILOSOPHY,
    [Show full text]
  • The Notion of Absurdity and Meaning of Life in Albert Camus Existentialism
    Open Journal of Philosophy, 2020, 10, 528-538 https://www.scirp.org/journal/ojpp ISSN Online: 2163-9442 ISSN Print: 2163-9434 The Notion of Absurdity and Meaning of Life in Albert Camus Existentialism Ambrose Tochukwu Arinze1, Ignatius Nnaemeka Onwuatuegwu2 1Pope John Paul II Major Seminary Okpuno, Anambra, Nigeria 2Philosophy Department, Faculty of Arts, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Awka, Nigeria How to cite this paper: Arinze, A. T., & Abstract Onwuatuegwu, I. N. (2020). The Notion of Absurdity and Meaning of Life in Albert Camus unreservedly condemned and strictly criticized and rejected suicide Camus Existentialism. Open Journal of Phi- and existential leap because suicide is a total surrender to absurdity and a to- losophy, 10, 528-538. tal confession that life is too much on the individual. His interest in existen- https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2020.104037 tialism is to explain the meaninglessness of life through his explication of the Received: September 4, 2020 absurd which is found in human existence; and which continues to torment Accepted: November 24, 2020 man until the finality of his existence which is death. The knowledge that life Published: November 27, 2020 is absurd is already a step towards conquering the meaninglessness of life. For Camus therefore, since absurd has no meaning, man must hold himself apart Copyright © 2020 by author(s) and from it and revolt against it. This is why he suggested philosophical suicide as Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative a solution to reverse the absurdity of life. The question then is, since man’s Commons Attribution International belief in the absurdity of existence, then how and where should he direct his License (CC BY 4.0).
    [Show full text]
  • Immanuel Kanfs Influence on the Psychology of Alfred Adler
    Immanuel Kanfs Influence on the Psychology of Alfred Adler Mark H. Stone Abstract The influence of immanuel Kant's philosophy on the psychology of Alfred Adler is important to understand because Kant much earlier addressed many ideas and concepts assumed original with Adler. Kant addressed the concepts of private sense and common sense, the primacy of reason, the existential questions of life, fictions, the power ofthe mind over sense perceptions, the unconscious and conscious mind, unity of the person, fostering community feeling, and determining a moral course of action, all concepts Adler later applied to his psychology. Familiarity with Kant's works can help clinicians gain a better understanding of what Adler wrote and im- plied when explicating Individual Psychology. Kant's writings can be complicated and difficult to understand, but several very readable essays are recommended and readily available. The purpose of this article is to show the influence of Immanuel Kant's (1 724-1804) philosofjhy upon the psychology of Alfred Adler (1870-1937). A number of Adier's important ideas can be traced back to the writings of Kant. This is not to diminish Adier's contributions to psychology because it is Adier's elucidation of these concepts for understanding behavior that is striking. This connection between Kant and Adler relates a segment of the continuing stream of thought in intellectual history that connects the ideas from one thinker to those of another. Ellenberger (1970) wrote, "Adler has many affinities with Kant" (p. 628). However, Ellenberger stopped short of elucidating any of these connections save a very short discussion of com- mon sense and private sense.
    [Show full text]
  • DICTIONARY of PHILOSOPHY This Page Intentionally Left Blank
    A DICTIONARY OF PHILOSOPHY This page intentionally left blank. A Dictionary of Philosophy Third edition A.R.Lacey Department of Philosophy, King’s College, University of London First published in 1976 by Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd Second edition 1986 Third edition 1996 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005. “To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk.” © A.R.Lacey 1976, 1986, 1996 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Lacey, A.R. A dictionary of philosophy.—3rd edn. 1. Philosophy—Dictionaries I. Title 190′.3′21 B41 ISBN 0-203-19819-0 Master e-book ISBN ISBN 0-203-19822-0 (Adobe eReader Format) ISBN 0-415-13332-7 (Print Edition) Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data A catalog record for this book is available on request Preface to the first edition This book aims to give the layman or intending student a pocket encyclopaedia of philosophy, one with a bias towards explaining terminology. The latter task is not an easy one since philosophy is regularly concerned with concepts which are unclear.
    [Show full text]
  • The Meaning of Life By: Terry Eagleton
    The Meaning of Life By: Terry Eagleton Chapter 4: Is Life What You Make It? Submitted by Paul Lussier ‘Recommended Readings’ for the Aspen/Yale Conference 2007 The following is an excerpt from: Terry Eagleton, The Meaning of Life. Oxford University Press (2007), pp.135-175 The Meaning of Life By: Terry Eagleton Chapter 4: Is Life What You Make It? So far, we have looked more at meaning than at life. Yet the word 'life' is every bit as problematic as the word 'meaning', and it is not hard to see why. For surely the reason why we cannot talk about the meaning of life is that there is no such thing as life? Are we not, as Wittgenstein might say, bewitched here by our grammar, which can generate the word 'life' in the singular just as it can the word 'tomato'? Perhaps we have the word 'life' only because our language is intrinsically reifying, 'Essence is expressed by grammar', as Wittgenstein remarks.24 How on earth could everything that falls under the heading of human life, from childbirth to clog dancing, be thought to stack up to a single meaning? Isn't this exactly the delusion of the paranoiac, for whom everything is supposed to be ominously resonant of everything else, bound together in an oppressively translucent whole? Or, if you prefer, the delusion of philosophy, which as Freud mischievously commented is the nearest thing to paranoia? Not even an individual life adds up to a unified whole. It is true that some people see their lives as forming an elegant narrative all the way from Introduction to Epilogue, but not everyone views themselves like this.
    [Show full text]