The Nazi Period in the Baltic States Michael Zimmermann

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Nazi Period in the Baltic States Michael Zimmermann ProJECT EDUCATION of ROMA | HISTorY ROMA CHILDREN COUNCIL CONSEIL OF EUROPE DE L´EUROPE IN EUroPE THE NAZI PERIOD 5.4 IN THE BALTIC STATES The Nazi Period in the Baltic States Michael Zimmermann A Dichotomous Feature of Persecution | Mobile Killing Units | Latvia | Estonia | Auschwitz-Birkenau In the Baltic States the killing of Roma started immediately after the German attack in 1941. SS and German military murdered the Roma who fell into their hands. Later on, when the mobile forces were transformed into stationary units and augmented by police units, they proceeded with support from civil occupation authorities. In Estonia only 5 to 10 percent of the pre-war Roma population survived the German occupation. INTroDUCTION OCCUPIED SOVIET UNION TALLINN Frontline, AUTUMN 1942 Autumn 1942 3 The German attack on the Soviet Union Ill. 1 (based upon Kenrick / Puxon 1995, p. 88, Route of the and the Baltic States in summer 1941 and Zimmermann 1999, p. 141) Einsatzgruppen from the very start had the character of A, B, C, D a racist war of conquest and extermina- 1 REICHSkoMMISSARIAT A OSTLAND MoSKAU tion. For this campaign four task forces 3 1 VAZMA (“Einsatzgruppen”) – mobile killing REICH MINSK 1 2 Under German units of the SS (“Schutzstaffel”, pro- SMOLENSK WARSCHAU civilian rule tective squadron) – were created. The 3 Under German “Einsatzgruppen” together with other GOMEL military rule SS units, German military and civil oc- GENERAL- B GOUVERNEMENT ROWNO 3 cupying forces murdered the Roma who 2 fell into their hands, but did not search KIEW 3 MILITARY TErrITorIES 2 REICHSkoMMISSARIAT for them with the zeal employed in fer- UkrAINE reting out Jews and communists. Howe- C CHArkoW ver, when the “Einsatzgruppen” were sacred. In Estonia more than 90 percent D transformed into locally fixed units of the 750-850 Roma were murdered. of the Security Police (“Sicherheits- The case of Lithuania needs further in- ODESSA 2 polizei”) and augmented by units of vestigation, but historians estimate that the German Order Police (“Ordnungs- the vast majority of the Roma populati- polizei”), as in the Baltic region, they on living there were shot. In addition, 3 proceeded to systematically kill Roma. in early 1944 2,000-3,000 Roma were 3 From 1941 to 1943, in Latvia probab- deported to Auschwitz Birkenau from ly a half of the 3,800 Roma were mas- Belarus and Lithuania. B L A C K S E A tures: the primary target of “Gypsy” pure”. However, in the German-occu- A DICHOTOMOUS persecution in Germany were the puta- pied territories precisely the reverse FEATURE OF PERSECUTION tive “Zigeunermischlinge”, “Gypsies” policy prevailed after 1939: wandering of “mixed blood” who, according to the Roma were in greater peril than the se- National Socialist persecution of the racial hygienics theorist Robert Ritter, dentary Roma. Roma hinged on the conception that the had “deviated from their original biolo- This dichotomous feature of behaviour of social groups was rooted gical nature.” The domestic policy did “Gypsy” persecution in turn derived in biological parameters and genetic not target the small group of itinerant from emphasising differing facets of factors. With respect to the Roma, this Roma, who married only among them- the hostile image of the “Gypsy Other”. racist notion had two characteristic fea- selves and were classified as “racially Within the Reich proper it was believed A Dichotomous Feature of Persecution Mobile Killing Units Latvia Estonia Auschwitz-Birkenau Ill. 2 Ill. 3 One of Robert Ritter’s forms for recording biological data on An “Einsatzgruppe” report filing 16,152 people killed, including Roma. Roma. (from Hancock 2002, p. 44) (from Kenrick / Puxon 1995, p. 91) that the main folk-racial threat stemmed tensive social contacts with the majority itinerant Roma. It was argued that their from the “Gypsy Mischlinge”, partial- population. Outside the Reich, especial- “mobile” life style merely camouflaged ly or totally sedentary in lifestyle, who ly in the occupied Eastern Territories, spying activities against the Germans were allegedly “degenerating” the “Ger- the phantasmal construct of the “Gypsy in the service of the “Jewish-Bolshevik man folk body” through their more in- Other” was projected mainly onto the world enemy”. [Ill. 2] men. They were to kill over a million Soviet state and communist party burea- MOBILE KILLING UNITS people. [Ill. 1] ucracy, the Jewish intelligentsia and any The “Einsatzgruppen” used broad Jews considered ready to offer resistance. guidelines to select the targets for their Yet already during the first month of the Historians investigating the policies of killings. Precise definitions did not inte- Soviet campaign, the “Einsatzgruppen” the National Socialists towards Roma rest them. Task Force A, which carried radicalised their actions. Now they began are in agreement that it was the Second out murders in the Baltic states and the to murder as many people of the Jewish World War – set in motion by the Nazi northern parts of Russia, calculated the population as possible. Simultaneously, regime on September 1, 1939, with its number of its victims up to February 1, the killing was extended to the Roma. attack on Poland – that led to an immen- 1942, at 240,410. Together with 218,000 In the USSR and the Baltic States se increase in oppression and persecuti- Jews shot and another 5,500 killed in German “Wehrmacht” (military) units on ending in genocide. In particular, the pogroms, they listed categories of dead were often not directly involved in the German attack on the Soviet Union in as “Lithuanians crossing the border, extermination of Roma. But the Mili- the summer of 1941, from the very start communists, partisans, mentally ill and tary Police, the Secret Military Police had the character of a racist war of con- others”. The composition of the 311 and in particular the army’s rear area quest and extermination. For this cam- “others” was not further detailed. Roma “Sicherungsdivisionen” in particular paign four “Einsatzgruppen” (A, B, C, may have been classified among the handed over “itinerant Gypsies” to the and D), mobile killing units of the SS, “partisans” and “others”. [Ill. 3] “Einsatzgruppen” to be shot. Over and were created. They received their pri- Roma were indeed among the above, “Wehrmacht” units provided con- mal instructions from the Reich Security victims of the “Einsatzgruppen” and other siderable organisational and technical Main Office. In all, the four task forces SS units on Soviet and Baltic soil. Their assistance in conjunction with the exe- A, B, C and D comprised some 3,000 initial target group had been Jews in the cutions perpetrated by the “Einsatzgrup- COUNCIL OF EUROPE ROMA | HISTorY ProJECT EDUCATION of ROMA CHILDREN IN EUroPE THE NAZI PERIOD 5.4 IN THE BALTIC STATES THE IMAGE of THE “ENEMY” The activity of the “Einsatzgruppen” and other SS units was based on a hierarchi- cally articulated image of the enemy. At its apex were Jews and communists and their phantasmal meld in the form of a “Jewish-Bolshevik world conspiracy”. In this ideological pyramid, “Gypsies” occupied a subordinate though not in- significant rung. They figured as “ra- cially inferior”, purportedly “asocial”, as “partisans”, “spies”, and “agents” of the imaginary “Jewish world ene- my”. Viewed by the “Einsatzgruppen” as Ill. 5 fifth-column informers in the service of Hinrich Lohse’s letter of December 1941. In rationalisation of the racially motivated kil- “Jewish Bolshevism”, they in particular ling of Roma in Libau, Lohse described the “Gypsies wandering around in the country” targeted travelling Roma whenever the as acting as carriers of infectious illnesses, in addition to being “unreliable elements who killing units learned of their existence. would neither obey the orders of the German authorities, nor be willing to carry out useful Regarded solely as auxiliaries of the work.” Further, he claimed, there was well-founded suspicion that they were harming the “world enemy”, their liquidation was not German cause through passing on information. Labelled in this way as spies, antisocials given first priority. and a menace to the people’s health, the “Gypsies” were presented by Lohse as fit for Ill. 4 slaughter: “I declare that they should be treated in the same way as Jews.” (from Zimmermann 1999, p. 143) (Detail) pen”. The “Einsatzgruppen” murdered communists. However, when the mobile Order Police, and could count on sup- the Roma who fell into their hands, but “Einsatzgruppen” were transformed into port from civil occupation authorities, as did not search for them with the zeal stationary units of the Security Police in the Baltic region, they proceeded to employed in ferreting out Jews and and augmented by units of the German systematically kill Roma. [Ills. 4, 5] Lohse’s circular of December 4, lice about the definition of the murder LATVIA 1941, had neither defined how a person victims led Karl Friedrich Knecht, the should be classified as a “Gypsy” nor Commander of the Order Police for Lat- whether the phrase “Gypsies wandering via, to issue an explanatory circular in While we are so far insufficiently infor- around in the country” meant also seden- March and again in April 1942. Accor- med about the killing of Roma in Lithua- tary Roma. The German Security Police in ding to this circular, it had been decided, nia, we know precisely that in Latvia the Latvia interpreted the statement of the sta- after discussion with the commander of systematic murder of Roma started on te governor in the sense that “settled Gyp- the Security Police in Latvia, that in fu- December 4, 1941, with the shooting of sies who have regular work and who were ture “only wandering Gypsies” should some one hundred Roma from the town of not a danger to society in a political or be arrested and handed over to the Se- Libau.
Recommended publications
  • SS-Totenkopfverbände from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia (Redirected from SS-Totenkopfverbande)
    Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history SS-Totenkopfverbände From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Redirected from SS-Totenkopfverbande) Navigation Not to be confused with 3rd SS Division Totenkopf, the Waffen-SS fighting unit. Main page This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. No cleanup reason Contents has been specified. Please help improve this article if you can. (December 2010) Featured content Current events This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding Random article citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (September 2010) Donate to Wikipedia [2] SS-Totenkopfverbände (SS-TV), rendered in English as "Death's-Head Units" (literally SS-TV meaning "Skull Units"), was the SS organization responsible for administering the Nazi SS-Totenkopfverbände Interaction concentration camps for the Third Reich. Help The SS-TV was an independent unit within the SS with its own ranks and command About Wikipedia structure. It ran the camps throughout Germany, such as Dachau, Bergen-Belsen and Community portal Buchenwald; in Nazi-occupied Europe, it ran Auschwitz in German occupied Poland and Recent changes Mauthausen in Austria as well as numerous other concentration and death camps. The Contact Wikipedia death camps' primary function was genocide and included Treblinka, Bełżec extermination camp and Sobibor. It was responsible for facilitating what was called the Final Solution, Totenkopf (Death's head) collar insignia, 13th Standarte known since as the Holocaust, in collaboration with the Reich Main Security Office[3] and the Toolbox of the SS-Totenkopfverbände SS Economic and Administrative Main Office or WVHA.
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Europe
    NAZI PLANS for EASTE RN EUR OPE A Study of Lebensraum Policies SECRET NAZI PLANS for EASTERN EUROPE A Study of Lebensraum Policies hy Ihor Kamenetsky ---- BOOKMAN ASSOCIATES :: New York Copyright © 1961 by Ihor Kamenetsky Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 61-9850 MANUFACTURED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BY UNITED PRINTING SERVICES, INC. NEW HAVEN, CONN. TO MY PARENTS Preface The dawn of the twentieth century witnessed the climax of imperialistic competition in Europe among the Great Pow­ ers. Entrenched in two opposing camps, they glared at each other over mountainous stockpiles of weapons gathered in feverish armament races. In the one camp was situated the Triple Entente, in the other the Triple Alliance of the Central Powers under Germany's leadership. The final and tragic re­ sult of this rivalry was World War I, during which Germany attempted to realize her imperialistic conception of M itteleuropa with the Berlin-Baghdad-Basra railway project to the Near East. Thus there would have been established a transcontinental highway for German industrial and commercial expansion through the Persian Gull to the Asian market. The security of this highway required that the pressure of Russian imperi­ alism on the Middle East be eliminated by the fragmentation of the Russian colonial empire into its ethnic components. Germany· planned the formation of a belt of buffer states ( asso­ ciated with the Central Powers and Turkey) from Finland, Beloruthenia ( Belorussia), Lithuania, Poland to Ukraine, the Caucasus, and even to Turkestan. The outbreak and nature of the Russian Revolution in 1917 offered an opportunity for Imperial Germany to realize this plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Guides to German Records Microfilmed at Alexandria, Va
    GUIDES TO GERMAN RECORDS MICROFILMED AT ALEXANDRIA, VA. No. 32. Records of the Reich Leader of the SS and Chief of the German Police (Part I) The National Archives National Archives and Records Service General Services Administration Washington: 1961 This finding aid has been prepared by the National Archives as part of its program of facilitating the use of records in its custody. The microfilm described in this guide may be consulted at the National Archives, where it is identified as RG 242, Microfilm Publication T175. To order microfilm, write to the Publications Sales Branch (NEPS), National Archives and Records Service (GSA), Washington, DC 20408. Some of the papers reproduced on the microfilm referred to in this and other guides of the same series may have been of private origin. The fact of their seizure is not believed to divest their original owners of any literary property rights in them. Anyone, therefore, who publishes them in whole or in part without permission of their authors may be held liable for infringement of such literary property rights. Library of Congress Catalog Card No. 58-9982 AMERICA! HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION COMMITTEE fOR THE STUDY OP WAR DOCUMENTS GUIDES TO GERMAN RECOBDS MICROFILMED AT ALEXAM)RIA, VA. No* 32» Records of the Reich Leader of the SS aad Chief of the German Police (HeiehsMhrer SS und Chef der Deutschen Polizei) 1) THE AMERICAN HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION (AHA) COMMITTEE FOR THE STUDY OF WAE DOCUMENTS GUIDES TO GERMAN RECORDS MICROFILMED AT ALEXANDRIA, VA* This is part of a series of Guides prepared
    [Show full text]
  • Spaces of Killing Using National Research to Inform Your Classroom Practice
    CENTRE FOR HOLOCAUST EDUCATION The entrance sign to Treblinka. Credit: Yad Vashem Spaces of killing Using national research to inform your classroom practice. Highlights from our research report ‘What do students know and understand about Research the Holocaust?’ Evidence from English secondary schools (Foster et al, 2016) briefing 4 Free to download at www.holocausteducation.org.uk/research If students are to understand the significance of the Holocaust and the full enormity of its scope and scale, they need to appreciate that it was a continent-wide genocide. Why does this matter? The perpetrators ultimately sought to kill every Jew, everywhere they could reach them with victims Knowledge of the ‘spaces of killing’ is crucial to an understanding of the uprooted from communities across Europe. It is therefore crucial to know about the geography of the Holocaust. If students do not appreciate the scale of the killings outside of Holocaust relating to the development of the concentration camp system; the location, role and purpose Germany and particularly the East, then it is impossible to grasp the devastation of the ghettos; where and when Nazi killing squads committed mass shootings; and the evolution of the of Jewish communities in Europe or the destruction of diverse and vibrant death camps. cultures that had developed over centuries. This briefing, the fourth in our series, explores students’ knowledge and understanding of these key Entire communities lost issues, drawing on survey research and focus group interviews with more than 8,000 11 to 18 year olds. Thousands of small towns and villages in Poland, Ukraine, Crimea, the Baltic states and Russia, which had a majority Jewish population before the war, are now home to not a single Jewish person.
    [Show full text]
  • The Perpetrators of the November 1938 Pogrom Through German-Jewish Eyes
    Chapter 4 The Perpetrators of the November 1938 Pogrom through German-Jewish Eyes Alan E. Steinweis The November 1938 pogrom, often referred to as the “Kristallnacht,” was the largest and most significant instance of organized anti-Jewish violence in Nazi Germany before the Second World War.1 In addition to the massive destruc- tion of synagogues and property, the pogrom involved the physical abuse and terrorizing of German Jews on a massive scale. German police reported an official death toll of 91, but the actual number of Jews killed was probably about ten times that many when one includes fatalities among Jews who were treated brutally during their arrest and subsequent imprisonment in Dachau, Buchenwald, and Sachsenhausen.2 Violence had been a normal feature of the Nazi regime’s anti-Jewish measures since 1933,3 but the scale and intensity of the Kristallnacht were unprecedented. The pogrom occurred less than one year before the outbreak of the war and the first atrocities by the Wehrmacht against Polish Jews, and less than three years before the Einsatzgruppen, Order Police, and other units began to undertake the mass murder of Jews in the Soviet Union. Knowledge about the perpetrators of the pogrom, therefore, pro- vides important context for understanding the violence that came later. To be sure, nobody has yet undertaken the extremely ambitious project to identify precisely which perpetrators of the Kristallnacht eventually would participate directly in the “Final Solution.” There certainly were many such cases, however, perhaps the most notable being Odilo Globocnik, who presided over the po- grom violence in Vienna in November 1938 and less than three years later was placed in charge of Operation Reinhardt, the mass murder of the Jews in the General Government.4 1 Many of the observations in this chapter are based on cases described and documented in the author’s book, Kristallnacht 1938 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • The Causes of Ukrainian-Polish Ethnic Cleansing 1943 Author(S): Timothy Snyder Source: Past & Present, No
    The Past and Present Society The Causes of Ukrainian-Polish Ethnic Cleansing 1943 Author(s): Timothy Snyder Source: Past & Present, No. 179 (May, 2003), pp. 197-234 Published by: Oxford University Press on behalf of The Past and Present Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3600827 . Accessed: 05/01/2014 17:29 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Oxford University Press and The Past and Present Society are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Past &Present. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 137.110.33.183 on Sun, 5 Jan 2014 17:29:27 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions THE CAUSES OF UKRAINIAN-POLISH ETHNIC CLEANSING 1943* Ethniccleansing hides in the shadow of the Holocaust. Even as horrorof Hitler'sFinal Solution motivates the study of other massatrocities, the totality of its exterminatory intention limits thevalue of the comparisons it elicits.Other policies of mass nationalviolence - the Turkish'massacre' of Armenians beginningin 1915, the Greco-Turkish'exchanges' of 1923, Stalin'sdeportation of nine Soviet nations beginning in 1935, Hitler'sexpulsion of Poles and Jewsfrom his enlargedReich after1939, and the forcedflight of Germans fromeastern Europein 1945 - havebeen retrievedfrom the margins of mili- tary and diplomatichistory.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Statements from the Defendants
    TWO HUNDRED AND SIXTEENTH DAY Saturday, 31 August 1946 Final statements from the defendants Ernst Kaltenbrunner THE PRESIDENT: I call upon the Defendant Ernst Kaltenbrunner. ERNST KALTENBRUNNER (Defendant): The Prosecution holds me responsible for the concentration camps, for the destruction of Jewish life, for Einsatzgruppen and other things. All of this is neither in accord with the evidence nor with the truth. The accusers as well as the accused are exposed to the dangers of a summary proceeding. It is correct that I had to take over the Reich Security Main Office. There was no guilt in that in itself. Such offices exist in governments of other nations too. However, the task and activity assigned to me in 1943 consisted almost exclusively in the reorganization of the German political and military intelligence service, though not as Heydrich's successor. Almost a year after his death I had to accept this post under orders and as an officer at a time when suspicion fell on Admiral Canaris of having collaborated with the enemy for years. In a short time I ascertained the treason of Canaris and his accomplices to the most frightful extent. Offices IV and V of the Reich Security Main Office were subordinate to me only theoretically, not in fact. The chart shown here of the different groups and the chain of command leading from them is wrong and misleading. Himmler, who understood in a masterly way how the SS, which for a long time had ceased to, form an organizational and ideological unit, could be split up into very small groups and brought under his immediate influence, so far as it served his purpose, together with Mueller, the Chief of the Gestapo, committed the crimes which we 378 31 Aug.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Florida Resource Manual on Holocaust Education Grades
    State of Florida Resource Manual on Holocaust Education Grades 7-8 A Study in Character Education A project of the Commissioner’s Task Force on Holocaust Education Authorization for reproduction is hereby granted to the state system of public education. No authorization is granted for distribution or reproduction outside the state system of public education without prior approval in writing. The views of this document do not necessarily represent those of the Florida Department of Education. 2 Table of Contents Introduction Definition of the Term Holocaust ............................................................ 7 Why Teach about the Holocaust............................................................. 8 The Question of Rationale.............................................................. 8 Florida’s Legislature/DOE Required Instruction.............................. 9 Required Instruction 1003.42, F.S.................................................. 9 Developing a Holocaust Unit .................................................................. 9 Interdisciplinary and Integrated Units ..................................................... 11 Suggested Topic Areas for a Course of Study on the Holocaust............ 11 Suggested Learning Activities ................................................................ 12 Eyewitnesses in Your Classroom ........................................................... 12 Discussion Points/Questions for Survivors ............................................. 13 Commonly Asked Questions by Students
    [Show full text]
  • Local Agency and Individual Initiative in the Evolution of the Holocaust: the Case of Heinrich Himmler
    Local Agency and Individual Initiative in the Evolution of the Holocaust: The Case of Heinrich Himmler By: Tanya Pazdernik 25 March 2013 Speaking in the early 1940s on the “grave matter” of the Jews, Heinrich Himmler asserted: “We had the moral right, we had the duty to our people to destroy this people which wanted to destroy us.”1 Appointed Reichsführer of the SS in January 1929, Himmler believed the total annihilation of the Jewish race necessary for the survival of the German nation. As such, he considered the Holocaust a moral duty. Indeed, the Nazi genocide of all “life unworthy of living,” known as the Holocaust, evolved from an ideology held by the highest officials of the Third Reich – an ideology rooted in a pseudoscientific racism that rationalized the systematic murder of over twelve million people, mostly during just a few years of World War Two. But ideologies do not murder. People do. And the leader of the Third Reich, Adolf Hitler, never personally murdered a single Jew. Instead, he relied on his subordinates to implement his often ill-defined visions. Thus, to understand the Holocaust as a broad social phenomenon we must refocus our lens away from an obsession with Hitler and onto his henchmen. One such underling was indeed Himmler. The problem in the lack of consensus among scholars is over the matter of who, precisely, bears responsibility for the Holocaust. Historians even sharply disagree about the place of Adolf Hitler in the decision-making processes of the Third Reich, particularly in regards to the Final Solution.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT Title of Document: the FURTHEST
    ABSTRACT Title of Document: THE FURTHEST WATCH OF THE REICH: NATIONAL SOCIALISM, ETHNIC GERMANS, AND THE OCCUPATION OF THE SERBIAN BANAT, 1941-1944 Mirna Zakic, Ph.D., 2011 Directed by: Professor Jeffrey Herf, Department of History This dissertation examines the Volksdeutsche (ethnic Germans) of the Serbian Banat (northeastern Serbia) during World War II, with a focus on their collaboration with the invading Germans from the Third Reich, and their participation in the occupation of their home region. It focuses on the occupation period (April 1941-October 1944) so as to illuminate three major themes: the mutual perceptions held by ethnic and Reich Germans and how these shaped policy; the motivation behind ethnic German collaboration; and the events which drew ethnic Germans ever deeper into complicity with the Third Reich. The Banat ethnic Germans profited from a fortuitous meeting of diplomatic, military, ideological and economic reasons, which prompted the Third Reich to occupy their home region in April 1941. They played a leading role in the administration and policing of the Serbian Banat until October 1944, when the Red Army invaded the Banat. The ethnic Germans collaborated with the Nazi regime in many ways: they accepted its worldview as their own, supplied it with food, administrative services and eventually soldiers. They acted as enforcers and executors of its policies, which benefited them as perceived racial and ideological kin to Reich Germans. These policies did so at the expense of the multiethnic Banat‟s other residents, especially Jews and Serbs. In this, the Third Reich replicated general policy guidelines already implemented inside Germany and elsewhere in German-occupied Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Motivation - the Motivation and Actions of the Einsatzgruppen by Walter S
    Special Motivation - The Motivation and Actions of the Einsatzgruppen by Walter S. Zapotoczny "...Then, stark naked, they had to run down more steps to an underground corridor that Led back up the ramp, where the gas van awaited them." Franz Schalling Einsatzgruppen policeman Like every historical event, the Holocaust evokes certain specific images. When mentioning the Holocaust, most people think of the concentration camps. They immediately envision emaciated victims in dirty striped uniforms staring incomprehensibly at their liberators or piles of corpses, too numerous to bury individually, bulldozed into mass graves. While those are accurate images, they are merely the product of the systematization of the genocide committed by the Third Reich. The reality of that genocide began not in the camps or in the gas chambers but with four small groups of murderers known as the Einsatzgruppen. Formed by Heinrich Himmler, Reichsfuhrer-SS, and Reinhard Heydrich, head of the Reich Security Main Office (RSHA), they operated in the territories captured by the German armies with the cooperation of German army units (Wehrmacht ) and local militias. By the spring of 1943, when the Germans began their retreat from Soviet territory, the Einsatzgruppen had murdered 1.25 million Jews and hundreds of thousands of Polish, Lithuanian, Latvian, Estonian and Soviet nationals, including prisoners of war. The Einsatzgruppen massacres preceded the invention of the death camps and significantly influenced their development. The Einsatzgruppen story offers insight into a fundamental Holocaust question of what made it possible for men, some of them ordinary men, to kill so many people so ruthlessly. The members of the Einsatzgruppen had developed a special motivation to kill.
    [Show full text]
  • Poland Study Guide Poland Study Guide
    Poland Study Guide POLAND STUDY GUIDE POLAND STUDY GUIDE Table of Contents Why Poland? In 1939, following a nonaggression agreement between the Germany and the Soviet Union known as the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact, Poland was again divided. That September, Why Poland Germany attacked Poland and conquered the western and central parts of Poland while the Page 3 Soviets took over the east. Part of Poland was directly annexed and governed as if it were Germany (that area would later include the infamous Nazi concentration camp Auschwitz- Birkenau). The remaining Polish territory, the “General Government,” was overseen by Hans Frank, and included many areas with large Jewish populations. For Nazi leadership, Map of Territories Annexed by Third Reich the occupation was an extension of the Nazi racial war and Poland was to be colonized. Page 4 Polish citizens were resettled, and Poles who the Nazis deemed to be a threat were arrested and shot. Polish priests and professors were shot. According to historian Richard Evans, “If the Poles were second-class citizens in the General Government, then the Jews scarcely Map of Concentration Camps in Poland qualified as human beings at all in the eyes of the German occupiers.” Jews were subject to humiliation and brutal violence as their property was destroyed or Page 5 looted. They were concentrated in ghettos or sent to work as slave laborers. But the large- scale systematic murder of Jews did not start until June 1941, when the Germans broke 2 the nonaggression pact with the Soviets, invaded the Soviet-held part of Poland, and sent 3 Chronology of the Holocaust special mobile units (the Einsatzgruppen) behind the fighting units to kill the Jews in nearby forests or pits.
    [Show full text]