Bettongia Penicillata)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Euhirudinea: Arhynchobdellida) in Danum Valley Rainforest (Borneo, Sabah)
@@B D9+82;7+*8 doi: 8+87788E9+82+*8 http://folia.paru.cas.cz Research Article Feeding strategies and competition between terrestrial Haemadipsa leeches (Euhirudinea: Arhynchobdellida) in Danum Valley rainforest (Borneo, Sabah) =andb !"#$3& F!!$GH!$ $G!G!!%![J- ography and taxonomy. We undertook research on two species inhabiting lowland dipterocarp forest, Haemadipsa picta K8'9' and Haemadipsa subagilis MK8'9'N!&PMN!ƽ!G G&ƽ-R=MGNG!J-[R=MN-[ GƽG!$$!RS!&!H. picta is more G!ƽ-$&!!=!J&! plant height. Haemadipsa subagilis &U!G!VG&[ G&!MNJ-H. pictaM!&![N= (ii) habitat specialisation of H. subagilis. Moreover, we provide new observations on their foraging behaviour. ectoparasites, foraging behaviour, Haemadipsidae, haematophagy, parasitism HB!->!G$- $ [ !& $ !-!!F- G!ƽ M>!!!GN &!! !GPB- $1+Z!! G ! [ $ ! ! -!HaemadipsaH81<'M brown leech species complex (former H. zeylanica sensu B9++79+8+BH%9++1NH!! latoB9+8+NP- fauna of the Oriental region has received much attention mary tropical rainforest, whereas more disturbed environ- !&KM8'9'8'*<8'*1N ments are dominated by conspicuously coloured H. picta. The tiger leech H. picta K 8'9' & G& !- coloured species, namely H. subagilis MK8'9'N gies of hematophagous leeches, have not been examined H. sumatrana MF 811*N & - G\! !& mortality and, therefore, their abundance in an ecosystem MB&8'19$!9++7N MK8'21NF&$G Many ecological aspects of the life history of haemad- simply apply this theory to ectoparasites, such as leeches, ipsid species remain unresolved, including establishing &!!!!B an average life span for each species and species habitat GG&!UM DM8'1<N G8';;N!-U$- important studies on the feeding habits of species of Hae- $ $G P- madipsa, and until now this was the only paper containing G!!G&-[ detailed data on growth after feeding and the length of time competition and niche partitioning. -
Wildlife Parasitology in Australia: Past, Present and Future
CSIRO PUBLISHING Australian Journal of Zoology, 2018, 66, 286–305 Review https://doi.org/10.1071/ZO19017 Wildlife parasitology in Australia: past, present and future David M. Spratt A,C and Ian Beveridge B AAustralian National Wildlife Collection, National Research Collections Australia, CSIRO, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia. BVeterinary Clinical Centre, Faculty of Veterinary and Agricultural Sciences, University of Melbourne, Werribee, Vic. 3030, Australia. CCorresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract. Wildlife parasitology is a highly diverse area of research encompassing many fields including taxonomy, ecology, pathology and epidemiology, and with participants from extremely disparate scientific fields. In addition, the organisms studied are highly dissimilar, ranging from platyhelminths, nematodes and acanthocephalans to insects, arachnids, crustaceans and protists. This review of the parasites of wildlife in Australia highlights the advances made to date, focussing on the work, interests and major findings of researchers over the years and identifies current significant gaps that exist in our understanding. The review is divided into three sections covering protist, helminth and arthropod parasites. The challenge to document the diversity of parasites in Australia continues at a traditional level but the advent of molecular methods has heightened the significance of this issue. Modern methods are providing an avenue for major advances in documenting and restructuring the phylogeny of protistan parasites in particular, while facilitating the recognition of species complexes in helminth taxa previously defined by traditional morphological methods. The life cycles, ecology and general biology of most parasites of wildlife in Australia are extremely poorly understood. While the phylogenetic origins of the Australian vertebrate fauna are complex, so too are the likely origins of their parasites, which do not necessarily mirror those of their hosts. -
Haemadipsa Rjukjuana Oka, 1910 (Hirudinida: Arhynchobdellida: Haemadipsidae) in Korea
�보 문� 韓國土壤動物學會誌 17(1-2) : 14~18 (2013) Korean Journal of Soil Zoology First Record of Blood-Feeding Terrestrial Leech, Haemadipsa rjukjuana Oka, 1910 (Hirudinida: Arhynchobdellida: Haemadipsidae) in Korea Hong-yul Seo, Ye Eun, Tae-seo Park, Ki-gyoung Kim, So-hyun Won1, Baek-jun Kim1, Hye-won Kim1, Joon-seok Chae1 and Takafumi Nakano2,* (Animal Resources Division, National Institute of Biological Resources, Korea 1College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University, Korea 2Department of Zoology, Graduate School of Science, Kyoto University, Japan) 국내 미기록인 흡혈성 산거머리 Haemadipsa rjukjuana Oka, 1910 보고 서홍렬∙은 예∙박태서∙김기경∙원소현1∙김백준1∙김혜원1∙채준석1∙Takafumi Nakano2,* (국립생물자원관 동물자원과, 1서울대학교 수의과대학, 2교토대학교 대학원 동물학과) ABSTRACT The terrestrial leeches from the peripheral island of the Korean Peninsula were identified as Haemadipsa rjukjuana Oka, 1910. The arhynchobdellid family Haemadipsidae and H. rjukjuana are newly added into the Korean leech fauna. This species is blood-feeding leech that attacks birds and medium or large sized mammals primarily, including human. The sequence of mitochondrial cytochrome c subunit I (COI), and the additional biology for this species are presented. This is the first study of terrestrial blood-feeding leeches in Korea. Key words : Hirudinida, Haemadipsidae, Terrestrial leech, Haemadipsa rjukjuana, First record, Korea INTRODUCTION and aquatic environments. Blanchard (1896) established Hae- madipsidae to distinguish blood-feeding terrestrial leeches from Leeches are carnivorous animals of clitellates with a constant their -
Leeches of the Suborder Hirudiniformes (Hirudinea: Haemopidae, Hirudinidae, Haemadipsidae) from the Ganga Watershed (Nepal, India: Bihar)
©Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien 103 B 77-88 Wien, Dezember 2001 Leeches of the suborder Hirudiniformes (Hirudinea: Haemopidae, Hirudinidae, Haemadipsidae) from the Ganga watershed (Nepal, India: Bihar) H. Nesemann* & S. Sharma** Abstract New records of three families of arhynchobdellid leeches (Hirudinea, Hirudiniformes) from Nepal, including two localities from India (Bihar), are presented. The sinojapanese Whitmania laevis, family Haemopidae, is found for the first time from the Himalayan region. The family Hirudinidae was found with Poecilobdella granulosa and Hirudinaria manillensis. A further leech, Myxobdella nepalica sp.n., is descri- bed. The terrestrial family Haemadipsidae has three taxa in the Nepalese Himalaya; Haemadipsa zeylanica agilis, H. zeylanica montivindicis and H. sylvestris. Zusammenfassung Aus Nepal werden Neunachweise von drei Familien der Egel (Hirudinea, Arhynchobdellida, Hirudini- formes) vorgestellt, die auch zwei Fundstellen in Indien (Bihar) einschließen. Die ostasiatische Art Whitmania laevis, Familie Haemopidae, wird erstmalig aus der Himalayaregion nachgewiesen. Es wurden drei Arten der Familie Hirudinidae gefunden: Poecilobdella granulosa und Hirudinaria manillensis; Myxobdella nepalica sp.n. wird neu beschrieben. Die landlebenden Haemadipsidae sind durch drei Taxa Haemadipsa zeylanica agilis, H. zeylanica montivindicis und H. sylvestris in Nepal vertreten, die sich bevorzugt an Gewässerufern aufhalten. Introduction In addition to the knowledge of the class Hirudinea from Nepal (NESEMANN & SHARMA 1996) new records of leech species collected from 1996 to 2001 are presented. The pre- sent paper deals with three families of Hirudiniformes. Short descriptions on their mor- phology are given supported by detailed figures. The aim of the study is to provide rea- ders with additional characteristics for the identification of the taxa in the field, using the keys of MOORE (1927), CHANDRA (1983) and SAWYER (1986). -
Arhynchobdellida (Annelida: Oligochaeta: Hirudinida): Phylogenetic Relationships and Evolution
MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 30 (2004) 213–225 www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Arhynchobdellida (Annelida: Oligochaeta: Hirudinida): phylogenetic relationships and evolution Elizabeth Bordaa,b,* and Mark E. Siddallb a Department of Biology, Graduate School and University Center, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA b Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, USA Received 15 July 2003; revised 29 August 2003 Abstract A remarkable diversity of life history strategies, geographic distributions, and morphological characters provide a rich substrate for investigating the evolutionary relationships of arhynchobdellid leeches. The phylogenetic relationships, using parsimony anal- ysis, of the order Arhynchobdellida were investigated using nuclear 18S and 28S rDNA, mitochondrial 12S rDNA, and cytochrome c oxidase subunit I sequence data, as well as 24 morphological characters. Thirty-nine arhynchobdellid species were selected to represent the seven currently recognized families. Sixteen rhynchobdellid leeches from the families Glossiphoniidae and Piscicolidae were included as outgroup taxa. Analysis of all available data resolved a single most-parsimonious tree. The cladogram conflicted with most of the traditional classification schemes of the Arhynchobdellida. Monophyly of the Erpobdelliformes and Hirudini- formes was supported, whereas the families Haemadipsidae, Haemopidae, and Hirudinidae, as well as the genera Hirudo or Ali- olimnatis, were found not to be monophyletic. The results provide insight on the phylogenetic positions for the taxonomically problematic families Americobdellidae and Cylicobdellidae, the genera Semiscolex, Patagoniobdella, and Mesobdella, as well as genera traditionally classified under Hirudinidae. The evolution of dietary and habitat preferences is examined. Ó 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. -
Trypanosomes of Australian Mammals: a Review ⇑ Craig K
International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 3 (2014) 57–66 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijppaw Review Trypanosomes of Australian mammals: A review ⇑ Craig K. Thompson , Stephanie S. Godfrey, R.C. Andrew Thompson School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, South Street, Western Australia 6150, Australia article info abstract Article history: Approximately 306 species of terrestrial and arboreal mammals are known to have inhabited the main- Received 19 November 2013 land and coastal islands of Australia at the time of European settlement in 1788. The exotic Trypanosoma Revised 27 February 2014 lewisi was the first mammalian trypanosome identified in Australia in 1888, while the first native species, Accepted 28 February 2014 Trypanosoma pteropi, was taxonomically described in 1913. Since these discoveries, about 22% of the indigenous mammalian fauna have been examined during the surveillance of trypanosome biodiversity in Australia, including 46 species of marsupials, 9 rodents, 9 bats and both monotremes. Of those Keywords: mammals examined, trypanosomes have been identified from 28 host species, with eight native species Trypanosoma spp. of Trypanosoma taxonomically described. These native trypanosomes include T. pteropi, Trypanosoma Marsupial Rodent thylacis, Trypanosoma hipposideri, Trypanosoma binneyi, Trypanosoma irwini, Trypanosoma copemani, Woylie Trypanosoma gilletti and Trypanosoma vegrandis. Exotic trypanosomes have also been identified from Surveillance the introduced mammalian fauna of Australia, and include T. lewisi, Trypanosoma melophagium, Trypanosoma Biodiversity theileri, Trypanosoma nabiasi and Trypanosoma evansi. Fortunately, T. evansi was eradicated soon after its introduction and did not establish in Australia. Of these exotic trypanosomes, T. -
Catalogue of Protozoan Parasites Recorded in Australia Peter J. O
1 CATALOGUE OF PROTOZOAN PARASITES RECORDED IN AUSTRALIA PETER J. O’DONOGHUE & ROBERT D. ADLARD O’Donoghue, P.J. & Adlard, R.D. 2000 02 29: Catalogue of protozoan parasites recorded in Australia. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 45(1):1-164. Brisbane. ISSN 0079-8835. Published reports of protozoan species from Australian animals have been compiled into a host- parasite checklist, a parasite-host checklist and a cross-referenced bibliography. Protozoa listed include parasites, commensals and symbionts but free-living species have been excluded. Over 590 protozoan species are listed including amoebae, flagellates, ciliates and ‘sporozoa’ (the latter comprising apicomplexans, microsporans, myxozoans, haplosporidians and paramyxeans). Organisms are recorded in association with some 520 hosts including mammals, marsupials, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish and invertebrates. Information has been abstracted from over 1,270 scientific publications predating 1999 and all records include taxonomic authorities, synonyms, common names, sites of infection within hosts and geographic locations. Protozoa, parasite checklist, host checklist, bibliography, Australia. Peter J. O’Donoghue, Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia 4072, Australia; Robert D. Adlard, Protozoa Section, Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane 4101, Australia; 31 January 2000. CONTENTS the literature for reports relevant to contemporary studies. Such problems could be avoided if all previous HOST-PARASITE CHECKLIST 5 records were consolidated into a single database. Most Mammals 5 researchers currently avail themselves of various Reptiles 21 electronic database and abstracting services but none Amphibians 26 include literature published earlier than 1985 and not all Birds 34 journal titles are covered in their databases. Fish 44 Invertebrates 54 Several catalogues of parasites in Australian PARASITE-HOST CHECKLIST 63 hosts have previously been published. -
Molecular Detection, Genetic and Phylogenetic Analysis of Trypanosome Species in Umkhanyakude District of Kwazulu-Natal Province, South Africa
MOLECULAR DETECTION, GENETIC AND PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF TRYPANOSOME SPECIES IN UMKHANYAKUDE DISTRICT OF KWAZULU-NATAL PROVINCE, SOUTH AFRICA By Moeti Oriel Taioe (Student no. 2005162918) Dissertation submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree Magister Scientiae in the Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, Department of Zoology and Entomology, University of the Free State Supervisors: Prof. O. M. M. Thekisoe & Dr. M. Y. Motloang December 2013 i SUPERVISORS Prof. Oriel M.M. Thekisoe Parasitology Research Program Department of Zoology and Entomology University of the Free State Qwaqwa Campus Private Bag X13 Phuthaditjhaba 9866 Dr. Makhosazana Y. Motloang Parasites, Vectors and Vector-borne Diseases Programme ARC-Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute Private Bag X05 Onderstepoort 0110 ii DECLARATION I, the undersigned, hereby declare that the work contained in this dissertation is my original work and that it has not, previously in its entirety or in part, been submitted at any university for a degree. I therefore cede copyright of this dissertation in favour of the University of the Free State. Signature:…………………….. Date :……………………… iii DEDICATION ‘To my nephews and nieces to inspire them in reaching their dreams and goals’ iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS To begin with I thank the ‘All Mighty God’ for giving me the strength and courage to wake up every day. My deepest gratitude goes to my supervisors Prof. Oriel Thekisoe and Dr. Makhosazana Motloang for the opportunity and guidance throughout the course of my study. I am thankful to my second father ‘Ntate Thekisoe’ Prof. Oriel Thekisoe, for his words of encouragement and support he has given me during hard times when everything seemed to go wrong. -
Biting Midges (Ceratopogonidae) As Vectors of Avian Trypanosomes Milena Svobodová1*, Olga V
Svobodová et al. Parasites & Vectors (2017) 10:224 DOI 10.1186/s13071-017-2158-9 RESEARCH Open Access Biting midges (Ceratopogonidae) as vectors of avian trypanosomes Milena Svobodová1*, Olga V. Dolnik1, Ivan Čepička2 and Jana Rádrová1 Abstract Background: Although avian trypanosomes are widespread parasites, the knowledge of their vectors is still incomplete. Despite biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) are considered as potential vectors of avian trypanosomes, their role in transmission has not been satisfactorily elucidated. Our aim was to clarify the potential of biting midges to sustain the development of avian trypanosomes by testing their susceptibility to different strains of avian trypanosomes experimentally. Moreover, we screened biting midges for natural infections in the wild. Results: Laboratory-bred biting midges Culicoides nubeculosus were highly susceptible to trypanosomes from the Trypanosoma bennetti and T. avium clades. Infection rates reached 100%, heavy infections developed in 55–87% of blood-fed females. Parasite stages from the insect gut were infective for birds. Moreover, midges could be infected after feeding on a trypanosome-positive bird. Avian trypanosomes can thus complete their cycle in birds and biting midges. Furthermore, we succeeded to find infected blood meal-free biting midges in the wild. Conclusions: Biting midges are probable vectors of avian trypanosomes belonging to T. bennetti group. Midges are highly susceptible to artificial infections, can be infected after feeding on birds, and T. bennetti-infected biting midges (Culicoides spp.) have been found in nature. Moreover, midges can be used as model hosts producing metacyclic avian trypanosome stages infective for avian hosts. Keywords: Culicoides nubeculosus, Trypanosoma bennetti, Trypanosoma avium, Trypanosoma culicavium,Life-cycle, Transmission, Host specificity, Avian parasite Background and localisation in the gut. -
Bloodlines: Mammals, Leeches, and Conservation in Southern Asia
Page 17 of 37 Systematics and Biodiversity 1 2 3 4 Bloodlines: mammals, leeches, and conservation in 5 6 7 southern Asia 8 9 10 1,2,3 4 3 11 MICHAEL TESSLER , SARAH R. WEISKOPF , LILY BERNIKER , REBECCA 12 13 HERSCH2, KYLE P. McCARTHY4, DOUGLAS W. YU5,6 & MARK E. SIDDALL1,2,3 14 15 16 17 1 18 Richard Gilder Graduate School, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 19 20 79th Street, New York, NY 10024, USA 21 22 2Sackler Institute for Comparative Genomics, American Museum of Natural History, Central 23 24 25 Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024, USA 26 3 27 Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 28 29 79th Street, New York, NY 10024, USA 30 31 4Department of Entomology and Wildlife Ecology, University of Delaware, 531 South College 32 33 34 Avenue, Newark, DE 19716, USA 35 36 5State Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources and Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, 32 37 38 Jiaochang Dong Lu, Kunming, Yunnan 650223, China 39 40 6 41 School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, 42 43 Norfolk NR4 7TJ UK 44 45 46 47 48 Running title: Mammals, leeches, and conservation 49 50 Correspondence to: Michael Tessler. E-mail: [email protected] 51 52 Southern Asia is a biodiversity hotspot both for terrestrial mammals and for leeches. Many 53 54 small-mammal groups are under-studied in this region, while other mammals are of known 55 56 57 58 59 60 URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/tsab Tessler et al. -
Ticks and Tick-Borne Diseases 11 (2020) 101501
Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases 11 (2020) 101501 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ttbdis Original article Isolation and partial characterisation of a novel Trypanosoma from the tick Ixodes ricinus T Lisa Luua, Kevin J. Bownb, Ana M. Palomarc, Mária Kazimírovád, Lesley Bell-Sakyia,e,* a Institute of Infection, Veterinary and Ecological Sciences, University of Liverpool, 146 Brownlow Hill, Liverpool L3 5RF, UK b School of Science, Engineering and Environment, G32 Peel Building, University of Salford, Salford M5 4WT, UK c Centre of Rickettsiosis and Arthropod-borne Diseases, CIBIR, C/ Piqueras, 98, Logroño 26006, La Rioja, Spain d Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dubravska cesta 9, SK-84506 Bratislava, Slovakia e The Pirbright Institute, Ash Road, Pirbright, Woking, Surrey GU24 0NF, UK ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Trypanosomes have long been recognised as being amongst the most important protozoan parasites of verte- Ixodes ricinus brates, from both medical and veterinary perspectives. Whilst numerous insect species have been identified as Tick cell line vectors, the role of ticks is less well understood. Here we report the isolation and partial molecular character- Trypanosome isation of a novel trypanosome from questing Ixodes ricinus ticks collected in Slovakia. The trypanosome was Slovakia isolated in tick cell culture and then partially characterised by microscopy and amplification of fragments of the 18S rRNA and 24Sα rDNA genes. Analysis of the resultant sequences suggests that the trypanosome designated as Trypanosoma sp. Bratislava1 may be a new species closely related to several species or strains of trypanosomes isolated from, or detected in, ticks in South America and Asia, and to Trypanosoma caninum isolated from dogs in Brazil. -
Feeding Strategies and Competition Between Terrestrial Haemadipsa Leeches (Euhirudinea: Arhynchobdellida) in Danum Valley Rainforest (Borneo, Sabah)
Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre CAS Folia Parasitologica 2017, 64: 031 doi: 10.14411/fp.2017.031 http://folia.paru.cas.cz Research Article Feeding strategies and competition between terrestrial Haemadipsa leeches (Euhirudinea: Arhynchobdellida) in Danum Valley rainforest (Borneo, Sabah) Piotr Gąsiorek and Hanna Różycka Institute of Zoology and Biomedical Research, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland Abstract: Haemadipsid leeches are among the most successful terrestrial invertebrates in Bornean rainforests. They are very common ectoparasites of vertebrates, and their abundance has facilitated the conduction of numerous projects in the fields of ecology, zooge- ography and taxonomy. We undertook research on two species inhabiting lowland dipterocarp forest, Haemadipsa picta Moore, 1929 and Haemadipsa subagilis (Moore, 1929), in order to address the following questions: (a) is there a difference in leech abundance between trails and off-trails?; (b) is ambush location dependent on specimen size or is species-specific?; (c) is intra- and interspecific competition limited by differences in foraging behaviours or vertical niche partitioning? Our results clearly show thatH. picta is more abundant on trails than on off-trails and is vertically dispersed within the understory; the size of a specimen is strongly correlated with plant height. Haemadipsa subagilis was found not to exhibit such patterns. We suggest a possible lowering of interspecific competition between these species as a result of: (i) size-dependent dispersion of