Curriculum Vitae --- Richard M
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Articulating Culturally Sensitive Knowledge Online: a Cherokee Case Study*
Articulating Culturally Sensitive Knowledge Online: A * Cherokee Case Study Robert Leopold Abstract: This article examines the online management of culturally sensitive knowledge through a discussion of a collaboration between the Museum of the Cherokee Indian and the Smithsonian Institution. It discusses the roles of the two institutions in a digital repatriation project involving an extensive body of 19th and 20th century manuscripts as well as the assumptions that informed their respective decisions regarding the online presentation of traditional cultural expressions. The case study explores some challenges involved in providing online access to culturally sensitive materials: first, by probing disparate senses of the term community, and then through a close examination of a particular class of heritage materials about which many Cherokee feel deeply ambivalent and for which notions of collective ownership are especially problematic. The Cherokee knowledge repatriation project offers a novel model for the circulation of digital heritage materials that may have wider applicability. The success of the project suggests that collaboration between tribal and non-tribal institutions may lead to more creative solutions for managing traditional cultural expressions than either alone can provide. [Keywords: Access Restrictions, Digital Repatriation, Culturally Sensitive Materials, Ethnographic Archiving, Knowledge Management. Keywords in italics are derived from the American Folklore Society Ethnographic Thesaurus, a standard nomenclature for the ethnographic disciplines.] Not long ago, I was giving a behind-the-scenes tour of the Smithsonian’s National Anthropological Archives when a member of the group asked me how our archives deals with culturally sensitive collections. Coincidentally, we were standing in front of a recent acquisition: the papers of Frederica de Laguna (1906-2004), an eminent anthropologist who conducted research among the Tlingit people of the Pacific Northwest Coast between 1949 and 1954. -
"Museum Anthropology" In: Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral
Museum Anthropology CANDACE S. GREENE Abstract Museum anthropology is a vigorous and growing perspective within anthropology. It applies insights from cultural anthropology to the assessment of how museums represent cultures, and increasingly looks to museum collections as the material record of cultures over time. It is a theoretical approach, distinct from technical aspects of museum operation, such as collections care and exhibit production, although in best practice, each informs the other. Degree programs in Museum Studies may include training in either theoretical museum anthropology or opera- tional aspects, although more programs focus on the later aspect and are not specific to the discipline of anthropology. INTRODUCTION American anthropology first developed in museums, and collections were considered key sources of primary data as well as a core product of field explorations. During the twentieth century, anthropology became discon- nected from museums as the discipline relocated its institutional center to universities and shifted its research interests to intensive local studies of particular cultures and societies with an emphasis on original fieldwork (Bouquet, 2001; Collier & Tschopik, 1954; Stocking, 1985; Thomas, 2010). Anthropology has arrived now at a new conceptual and practical moment when museums and collections are again integral to the discipline, with the Council for Museum Anthropology that is an active section of the American Anthropological Association. There is a large and diverse body of relevant theory to be applied, there are numerous publication outlets, and there are clear opportunities for mutually productive collaboration with the source communities in which collections originated. FOUNDATIONAL RESEARCH In the past 30 years, anthropology has developed a new understanding of museums, defining them as sites for the production of knowledge as wellas its dissemination to a wide audience. -
Anthropology
The Major Experience: NATURAL SCIENCE ANTHROPOLOGY Anthropology is the study of humans and their organizations through the concept of culture across time and geography. The discipline draws on the insights of social and natural sciences, humanities and arts, to study the ways human cultures shape and are shaped by historical, environmental, biological and social forces. Anthropology majors get an education that combines a critical understanding of theories and approaches with practical application through individual and collaborative laboratory work, including fieldwork in local and international locations. Graduates enter the world of work with a broad base of research and critical thinking skills that are desired in a wide range of employment contexts. These include: • An understanding of the many ways anthropological • Critical thinking and analysis experience from completing approaches, methods and theoretical perspectives are used to challenging coursework, working in labs, or on fieldwork project. study the wide variety of human behaviors in various social and • Problem-solving, creativity and decision-making skills that cultural contexts. are honed by identifying research questions, designing ethical • An understanding of the historical and social contexts of human quantitative and qualitative anthropological research plans and diversity, group behaviors, and the nuances of navigating cross- evaluating data using a variety of analytical techniques to draw cultural situations. conclusions. • Careful and intentional time and resource management skills • Outstanding oral and written communication skills from tackling from multiple experiences locating, organizing and evaluating complex theoretical materials, technical research challenges information from various sources while carrying out research and a wide range of interpersonal interactions toward the goal projects. -
Art, Artifact, Anthropology: the Display and Interpretation of Native American Material Culture in North American Museums Laura Browarny Seton Hall University
Seton Hall University eRepository @ Seton Hall Seton Hall University Dissertations and Theses Seton Hall University Dissertations and Theses (ETDs) 2010 Art, Artifact, Anthropology: The Display and Interpretation of Native American Material Culture in North American Museums Laura Browarny Seton Hall University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.shu.edu/dissertations Part of the Anthropology Commons, and the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Browarny, Laura, "Art, Artifact, Anthropology: The Display and Interpretation of Native American Material Culture in North American Museums" (2010). Seton Hall University Dissertations and Theses (ETDs). 736. https://scholarship.shu.edu/dissertations/736 Art, Artifact, Anthropology: The Display and Interpretation of Native American Material Culture in North American Museums By Laura Browarny Advised by Dr. Charlotte Nichols, Ph.D Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of: Master of Arts in Museum Professions Seton Hall University, South Orange, NJ August 2010 Abstract Native American material culture appears in a wide variety of museum contexts across the United States. Historically, these artifacts have been misinterpreted, misrepresented, and ultimately disrespected. Today, many museums are making strides to reorganize and rejuvenate their American lndian collections, and these attempts are manifested differently in each museum genre. In this paper, I discuss the history of the display of lndian objects in different types of museums, the ways in which these methods of display have evolved over time, and how these early conventions still influence current museum practices. I analyze the theory and works of Franz Boas and relate his early methods to modern museum practices. Finally, I present a series of case studies on various museums that actively collect and exhibit lndian cultural material, including the Metropolitan Museum of Art, The American and Field Museums of Natural History, the Museum of lndian Arts and Culture, and the Navajo Nation Museum. -
OAC Members Page 1 Name Profile Address Location Country School
OAC Members Name Profile Address Location Country School/Organization/Current anthropological attachment Website Erik Cohen http://openanthcoop.ning.com/xn/detail/u_0q3436294e00n Bangkok Thailand Hebrew University of Jerusalem Israel (Emeritus) - Liviu Chelcea http://openanthcoop.ning.com/xn/detail/u_13fm1mp3j3ec0 Romania economic anth, kinship - Fiza Ishaq http://openanthcoop.ning.com/xn/detail/u_257csvwenh01d Bangalore, Karnataka India -- -- Budi Puspa Priadi http://openanthcoop.ning.com/xn/detail/u_2chvjykjv4cz8 Yogyakarta Indonesia Gadjah Mada University ---- E. Paul Durrenberger http://openanthcoop.ning.com/xn/detail/u_3l4ha53wqxfjt United States Penn State //www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/e/p/epd2/ Joe Long http://openanthcoop.ning.com/xn/detail/u_0b6vedfu8to4e Aberdeen United Kingdom University of Aberdeen /www.abdn.ac.uk/anthropology/postgrad/details.php?id=anp037 Louise de la Gorgendiere http://openanthcoop.ning.com/xn/detail/u_1w9frbg5i32ep Ottawa Canada Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada /www.carleton.ca/socanth/faculty/gorgendiere.html Sebnem Ugural http://openanthcoop.ning.com/xn/detail/u_0h8qc5txfeu01 london United Kingdom University of Essex /www.seb-nem.com/ millo mamung http://openanthcoop.ning.com/xn/detail/u_0cs1x9hd3jmlk arunachal pradesh India rajiv gandhi university @yahoo.com Mangi Lal Purohit http://openanthcoop.ning.com/xn/detail/u_0r5sad7imypae Rajasthan India Aakar Trust aakartrust.org Hakan Ergül http://openanthcoop.ning.com/xn/detail/u_2o9ookbjyxvcv Turkey Anadolu University academy.anadolu.edu.tr/xdisplayx.asp?kod=0&acc=hkergul -
Some Thoughts on Culture/Media
Some Thoughts on Culture/Media Faye Ginsburg When I was asked to develop a program in documentation. Until very recently, with the exception ethnographic film in 1986,1 was determined to develop of some interest in the development of media use by a curriculum or, more ambitiously, expand the paradigm indigenous peoples since the 1980s (Ginsburg 1991, in a way that would not reproduce the reified dualisms 1993; Michaels 1986,1991a, 1991b; Ruby 1991; Turner of gemienschafiJgesellschaft that have had a striking 1991, 1992a, 1992b), there has been little systematic and depressing resilience in the field of ethnographic ethnographic engagement with what is rapidly becoming film, visual anthropology, and communications research. the most widespread means of cultural production and Despite the early and important work of people such as mediation on the globe. As Debra Spitulnick notes in Jean Rouch that broke down these barriers, notions of her recent review of "Anthropology and the Mass "us" as high-tech and post-industrial and "them" as pre- Media," tech and underdeveloped still persist. Myriad versions could be summarized and parodied along the following ...an inquiry into just why and how anthropologists lines: have managed to neglect the centrality of mass media in twentieth century life would not only be of we have cameras/ they have exotic rituals historical interest, but also of potential use in we have mass media/ they have "authentic" art illuminating certain conceptual gaps in we have alienation/ they have face to face contemporary anthropological theory (1993: 1) communities we have post-modernism/ they have ecologically- In the field of communications, much contemporary integrated world views theory still views mass media as inexorably hegemonic and homogenizing in the interest of dominant social For anthropologists, mass media have mostly been groups, wiping out the cultural integrity, authenticity, viewed as disruptive if not corrupting of the small-scale and diversity of the people at the receiving end. -
Editor's Introduction
Studies in Visual Communication Volume 1 Issue 1 Fall 1974 Article 2 1974 Editor's Introduction Sol Worth Recommended Citation Worth, S. (1974). Editor's Introduction. 1 (1), 1-2. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/svc/vol1/ iss1/2 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/svc/vol1/iss1/2 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Editor's Introduction This contents is available in Studies in Visual Communication: https://repository.upenn.edu/svc/vol1/iss1/2 teachers. It also seemed to be the case that the term "Program in Ethnographic Film" seemed to emphasize r • ~ filmmaking, while both that term and "Visual Anthropol ogy" seemed to exclude people in Sociology, Psychology, Art History, Communication, and other related fields, who were also interested in how man thought of, understood, EDITOR'S INTRODUCTION made, communicated by, and used materials and events that were in the visual mode. Volume One, Number One of a new publication is always The very awkwardness of this new term, The Anthropol . an ambiguous event. On the one hand there is no question ogy of Visual Communication, which we have chosen as the that adding to the unending stream of publications is in itself title of our Society and of our publication, might have one always suspect; on the other hand grown men and women important and salutary effect. It can never be made to roll devote unusual amounts of energy for no economic, and very glibly off the tongue as a description of what one does, or of little social compensation, in order to start, sustain, and whom one is affiliated with. -
Evolving Humanity, Emerging Worlds IUAES2013, University of Manchester, 5Th-10Th August 2013 Sponsors
The 17th World Congress of the IUAES2013 Evolving Humanity, Emerging Worlds Evolving Humanity, IUAES2013, University of Manchester, 5th-10th August 2013 Sponsors: Evolving Humanity, Emerging Worlds Monday 5th August, Bridgewater Hall (Monday only) 12.00-14.00 Registration 14.00-15.00 Opening Ceremony 15.00-16.30 Inaugural Lecture by Leslie Aiello 16.30-17.00 Coffe/Tea Break 17.00-19.00 Plenary Debate: “Humans have no nature, what they have is history” 19.00-21.00 Reception Tuesday 6th August, University Conference Centre Complex (all remaining days) 09.00-10.30 Panel Sessions 10.30-11.00 Coffee/Tea Break 11.00-12.30 Panel Sessions 12.30-14.00 Lunch (also ASA AOB meeting and ICSU presentation) 14.00-15.30 Panel Sessions 15.30-16.00 Coffee/Tea Break 16.00-17.30 Firth Lecture by Lourdes Arizpe 18.00-19.00 IUAES Commission Business Meetings and Other meetings 19.00-21.00 Presentation of bids to host future congesses and inter-congresses Wednesday 7th August 09.00-10.30 Panel Sessions 10.30-11.00 Coffee/Tea Break Hallsworth Plenary Debate: 11.00-13.00 “Justice for people must come before justice for the environment”. 13.00-14.30 Lunch (also ERCEA presentation, EASA Mobilities and AMCE meetings) 14.30-16.00 Panel Sessions 16.00-16.30 Coffee/Tea Break 16.30-18.00 Panel Sessions 18.30-19.30 WCAA Ethics Taskforce and WCAA IntDels meetings 19.30-21.00 Open Commissions Meeting Thursday 8th August 09.00-10.30 Panel Sessions 10.30-11.00 Coffee/Tea Break 11.00-12.30 Panel Sessions 12.30-14.00 Lunch (also ASA Apply meeting) 14.00-15.30 Panel Sessions 15.30-16.00 Coffee/Tea Break 16.00-17.30 Huxley Lecture by Howard Morphy 18.00-19.00 ALA, VANEASA and WCAA AOA meetings 19.00-21.00 Council of IUAES Commissions Friday 9th August 09.00-10.30 Panel Sessions 10.30-11.00 Coffee/Tea Break Plenary Debate: 11.00-13.00 “The free movement of people around the world would be utopian”. -
Museum Anthropology: Anthropology 397, Anthropology 699, MUSE 780
Museum Anthropology: Anthropology 397, Anthropology 699, MUSE 780 Spring Semester 2015 Professor Sandra Olsen Seminar, 3 hours credit Office: 6E Spooner Hall Tuesdays 2:30-5:00 Phone: (785) 864-6511 Spooner Hall, Room 6A Email: [email protected] Office hours for Dr. Olsen by appointment, in 6E Spooner. Graduate Research Assistant: Mrs. Suzanne Decker Email: [email protected] Holidays Spring Break: March 16-22 Exams and Due Dates Mid-term Exam: March 24 Virtual Exhibit Project Due: April 21 Final Exam: 1:30-4:00 pm, Wednesday, May 13, 2015 Course Description An introduction to the historical background, practice, and ethical issues involved in the creation, presentation, and dissemination of anthropological information in a museum setting. The course also considers current issues facing anthropologists, such as: contested rights to collections; representation and interpretation of cultures; art and artifact; conceptualization of exhibitions; and anthropological research and education in the museum. Classes Jan. 20. Lecture 1. Part I. Introduction to the course and its structure. Individual projects: Developing a virtual exhibition. Round-table discussion topics. Part II. Defining Museum Anthropology. Assignments: Bouquet 2012, Ch. 4. Visit website for the Council for Museum Anthropology, (Section of the American Anthropological Association): http://museumanthropology.org/ Jan. 27. Lecture 2. Explorers, presidents, royalty, and early anthropologists: early collecting and curiosity cabinets. Assignment: Read: Ames 1992, Ch. 2, pp. 15-24; Davenne 2012, pp. 6-43, 82-115, Henare, Ch. 2. Listen to all of the Smithsonian curators’ presentations on the website: http://anthropology.si.edu/foundingcollections.html Feb. 3. Lecture 3. Part I. Buffalo Bill’s Wild West Show and world expositions: reenactments and cultural cannibalism. -
Materials Contributed by Jason Baird Jackson
Materials contributed by Jason Baird Jackson Mathers Museum of World Cultures Department of Folklore and Ethnomusicology Department of Anthropology Indiana University These materials are from an Indiana University graduate course titled Curatorship (FOLK F731). While the majority of course participants come from the Department of Folklore and Ethnomusicology, a significant number of students from the Department of Anthropology, the Arts Administration program in the School of Public and Environmental Affairs, and the Information and Library Science program in the School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering also take the course. The Departments of History, History of Art, and American Studies have also been represented by enrollees. The course typically includes 8-12 MA and PhD students drawn from these programs. Both folklorists and ethnomusicologists are represented among those from the Department of Folklore and Ethnomusicology. The course has been taken by students who are now working as curators and as other kinds of museum professionals, by graduates now working in other kinds of public humanities (especially public folklore) positions, and by university-based scholars, some of whom maintain a museum focus in their work. These kinds of outcomes are those that the course is intended to serve. In the ecology of coursework offered at Indiana University, this course is most closely aligned with a neighboring course called Museums and Material Culture (FOLK F730). As that course has a particular focus on issues of display—both in everyday life and in museums—the exhibition side of curatorship is downplayed in Curatorship. This course combines aspects of a brief, intense, graduate level introduction to general museum work, with a SIMA-like focus on collections research, and the seminar-like exploration of themes of special concerns to MA and PhD level curators. -
Documenting and Presenting Intangible Cultural Heritage on Film
DOCUMENTING AND PRESENTING INTANGIBLE CULTURAL HERITAGE ON FILM DOCUMENTING AND PRESENTING INTANGIBLE CULTURAL HERITAGE ON FILM DOKUMENTIRANJE IN PREDSTAVLJANJE NESNOVNE KULTURNE DEDIŠČINE S FILMOM Edited by Nadja Valentinčič Furlan Ljubljana, 2015 Documenting and Presenting Intangible Cultural Heritage on Film Editor: Nadja Valentinčič Furlan Peer-reviewers: Felicia Hughes-Freeland, Tanja Bukovčan Translation into English and language revision of English texts: David Limon Translation into Slovene: Franc Smrke, Nives Sulič Dular, Nadja Valentinčič Furlan Language revision of Slovene texts: Vilma Kavšček Graphic art and design: Ana Destovnik Cover photo: Confronting the “ugly one” in Drežnica, photomontage from photographs by Kosjenka Brajdić Petek (Rovinj, 2015) and Rado Urevc (Drežnica, 2007). Issued and published by: Slovene Ethnographic Museum, represented by Tanja Roženbergar Printed by: T2 studio d.o.o. Print run: 500 Ljubljana, 2015 © 2015, authors and the Slovene Ethnographic Museum The authors are responsible for the content of the contributions. CIP - Kataložni zapis o publikaciji Narodna in univerzitetna knjižnica, Ljubljana 719:791.229.2(497.4)(082) DOKUMENTIRANJE in predstavljanje nesnovne kulturne dediščine s filmom = Documenting and presenting intangible cultural heritage on film / uredila Nadja Valentinčič Furlan ; [prevodi David Limon ... et al.]. - Ljubljana : Slovenski etnografski muzej, 2015 ISBN 978-961-6388-60-3 1. Vzp. stv. nasl. 2. Valentinčič Furlan, Nadja 283065600 Published with the support of the Ministry of -
Heye Foundation Records, 1890-1989
Museum of the American Indian/ Heye Foundation Records, 1890-1989 by Jennifer O'Neal and Rachel Menyuk 2012 This finding aid was generated automatically on August 12, 2014 National Museum of the American Indian Archive Center 4220 Silver Hill Rd Suitland , Maryland, 20746-2863 Phone: 301.238.1400 [email protected] http://nmai.si.edu/explore/collections/archive/ Table of Contents Collection Overview......................................................................................................... 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 History of the Museum of the American Indian/Heye Foundation................................... 2 Scope and Content Note................................................................................................. 3 Arrangement..................................................................................................................... 3 Names and Subject Terms ............................................................................................. 3 Container Listing.............................................................................................................. 6 Series 1: Directors, 1908-1990................................................................................ 6 Series 2: Board of Trustees, 1916-1990................................................................ 63 Series 3: Administrative, 1916-1989.....................................................................