Annual Report and Accounts 1966

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Annual Report and Accounts 1966 BANK OF ENGLAND REPORT FOR THE YEAR EN DED 28th FEBRUARY 1966 Issued by Order of the C Ollr/ 0/ Directors, 711z July 1966 Court of Directors 28th February 1966 The Rt. HOD. the Earl of Cromer, M.B.E., Governor Leslie Kenneth O'Brien, Esq., Deputy Governor William Maurice Allen, Esq. lames Vincent Bailey, Esq. The Rt. Hon. Lord Bicester Sir George Lewis French Bolton, K.CM.G. Sir William John Carron Sir Geoffrey Cecil Ryves Eley, C.B.E. William Johnston Keswick, Esq. The Rt. Hon. Lord Kindersley, CB.E., M.C. Cecil Harmsworth King, Esq. Sir John Maurice Laing Christopher Jeremy Morse, Esq. The Rt. Hon. Lord Nelson of Stafford Sir Maurice Henry Parsons Sir William Henry Pilkington Michael James Babington Smith, Esq., CB.E. Sir Henry Wilson Smith, K.CB., K.B.E. The term of office of Lord Bicester and Sir Geoffrey Eley expired on 28th February 1966; the Rt. Hon. Lord Robens of Woldingham, P.C., and Sir Ronald Thornton were appointed in their place for a period of four years. The term of office of Mr. W. M. Alien and Sir Henry Wilson Smith also expired on 28th February 1966 and they were reappointed for a period of four years. The term of office of the Earl of Cromer expired on 30tb June 1966. It was announced in April that Mr. L. K. O'Brien had been appointed Governor in his place for a period of five years from 1st July 1966 and that Sir Maurice Parsons had been appointed Deputy Governor for the same period. Mr. J. Q. Hollom was appointed to the Court for the remainder of Sir Maurice Parsons' term of office as a Director, namely until 28th February 1969. Bank of England Report for the year ended 28th February 1966 The first part of this Report discusses the main monetary developments during the year, most of which have already been reported more fully in the Bank's Quarterly Bulletins. The second part, which begins on page 15 with the Bank of England Return for 28th February 1966, deals with some particular aspects of the Bank's work. The year was an eventful one, particularly abroad and an appeal to corporations to repat­ in the foreign exchange market. During the riate liquid funds and to reduce outward direct spring and summer of 1965 the pound came investment. The U.S. measures soon led to a under very heavy pressure at times. caused general shortage of dollars, and the modest largely by fears of devaluation. Then. from inflow of exchange into the United Kingdom September onwards. confidence improved and ceased. Moreover, from the middle of March sterling made a marked recovery. Primacy in the approach of the Budget caused uncertainty economic policy had to be given to measures in the market, and rumours of sterling devalua· which would reduce the growth in the pressure tion became rife. There were very heavy sales of domestic demand and would restore a proper of sterling during the last week of March and external balance: among these measures was early in April; but they ceased after the Prime the tightening of credit restrictions. By the Minister's assurance in Paris. on 3rd April, end of 1965 the balance of payments had that there would be no devaluation. The Bud­ improved considerably; nevertheless, much get three days later was well received in the further progress was necessary if the underly­ market; and sentiment improved further after ing external deficit was to be eliminated. Early another speech by the Prime Minister, in New in 1966, when home demand still remained York on 14th April. in which he made it clear high, more steps were taken to contain it, that on first taking office the Government bad and in particular to secure continued restraint rejected deva luation as a solution to the coun­ of credit. try's balance of payments problems. There­ after the authorities were again able to acquire 'I1te external situation foreign exchange for the reserves, while allow­ Foreign exchange After the exceptionally ing the spot rate to rise gradually-from ~3rkel heavy drain on the reserves around $2·79 at the beginning of April to In November and December 1964, the pressure almost $2·80 at the end. on sterling had gradually eased. In February The better tone in the foreign exchange mar­ 1965 there was even a moderate inflow of ket was maintained for most of May, but ~xchange, which arose mainly because relative towards the end of the month sentiment again Interest rates made it advantageous for the faltered and the spot rate fell back to $2·791. aCCepting houses and overseas banks to switch Confidence remained weak in June and July. a su~sta.ntial amount of foreign currency The monthly trade figures continued to be depoSIts IOto sterling, for on-lending to local disappointing and misgivings persisted abroad ~uthorit ies and other domestic borrowers. The about the prospects for the economy: there ~mprovement, however. was short-lived. Dur­ were renewed rumours of sterling devaluation. Ing February the V.S. authorities had taken The pressure ceased only briefly after the s:eps to reduce their balance of payments defi­ Chancellor's measures of 27th July (described CIt: these included restraints on bank lending later). and early in August there was again per- 1 sistenl talk of devaluation, accompanied by month in which the authorities had first sup_ further large-scale selling of sterling. During ported the forward market on a large scale. these months the withdrawal of overseas funds They were li ttle changed during March 1966. from London was aggravated by the seasonal weakness of the balance of payments and by the conversion back into foreign currency of Reserves and At the end of February some of the funds which the banks had earlier speciat assistance 1965 the United Kingdom sw itched into sterling. had already drawn the equivalent of $1,000 mil­ Towards the end of August the pressure to lion from the International Monetary Fund; and sell sterling appeared to be petering out, and Switzerland, which is not a member of the Fund in the first few days of September the authori­ but is associated with the General Arrange­ ties were able to recover modest amounts of ments to Borrow, had provided a three-year exchange. On 10th September, the announce· cred it in Swiss francs equivalent to $80 million. ment that further international resources had In addition, $705 million was outstanding under been mobilised behind sterling gave a marked the swap facility with the Federal Reserve Bank impetus to the change in sentiment. From then of New York and short-term facilities with until after the turn of the year a considerable other central banks. By the end of April a amount of foreign exchange was acquired for further $392 million (net) had been drawn the reserves, and the authorities were able to under these facilities, raising the total of short­ repay much of the short-term assistance taken term assistance outstanding to $1,097 million. in the summer. The spot rate moved up to On 25th May the United Kingdom made a over $2·80. touching $2·80} in November and further drawing from the I.M.F., repayable in January. within five years and equivalent to $1,400 mil­ In February 1966, however, the rate fell back lion. The drawing was made in eleven cur­ and demand for sterling slackened: the market rencies: the Fund provided the equivalent of was unsettled first by the threat of a rail strike $475 million fro m its existing currency hold· and by poor trade figures for January, and later ings, $400 million from the sale of gold. and by uncertainty arising fro m the possibility of $525 million through the General Arrangements an early general election. On 28th February, to Borrow. As in December 1964, Switzerland when the date of the election was announced, provided a parallel credit-for fi ve years and the spot rate fe ll below $2'80 for the first time equivalent to $40 million. Of the total new since the previous September. Early in March borrowing of $1,440 million. $1.097 million was it fell fu rther, touching $2'791 at one time; dur­ used to repay all outstand ing short-term debt ing the rest of the month it remained fairly and the balance of $343 million (£122 milli on) steady at a little above this level. was added to the reserves. By no means all the exchange that the After sterling came under renewed pressure, authorities acquired from September onwards from June onwards, further recourse was made was used to repay short-term assistance, or to to the $750 million swap faci lity with the augment the reserves. Some of it was the F.R.B., and total assistance outstanding rose counterpart of the reduction in the authorities' to a peak at the end of August. By then the out standing forward commitments. Up to Sep­ whole of the $750 million had been drawn and tern ber 1965 most of the very large number the U.S. authorities had provided an additional of forward contracts, originally entered into $140 million. also on a swap basis. Despite around the end of 1964, were extended as they these drawings. equivalent to £3 18 million. and matured, and from time to time. notably in the receipt of £4 1 million in July from Western March and August 1965, there was a fresh Germany- as provision for future purchases demand for forward exchange. The authori­ under the agreement to offset part of the forei~ ties' forward commitments with the market exchange cost of u.K.
Recommended publications
  • Trends in Stroke Mortality in Greater London and South East England
    Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 1997;51:121-126 121 Trends in stroke mortality in Greater London J Epidemiol Community Health: first published as 10.1136/jech.51.2.121 on 1 April 1997. Downloaded from and south east England-evidence for a cohort effect? Ravi Maheswaran, David P Strachan, Paul Elliott, Martin J Shipley Abstract to London to work in the domestic services Objective and setting - To examine time where they generally had a nutritious diet. A trends in stroke mortality in Greater Lon- study of proportional mortality from stroke don compared with the surrounding South suggested that persons born in London retained East Region of England. their lower risk of stroke when they moved Design - Age-cohort analysis based on elsewhere,3 but another study which used routine mortality data. standardised mortality ratios suggested the op- Subjects - Resident population aged 45 posite - people who moved to London acquired years or more. a lower risk of fatal stroke.4 Main outcome measure - Age specific While standardised mortality ratios for stroke stroke mortality rates, 1951-92. for all ages in Greater London are low, Health Main results - In 1951, stroke mortality of the Nation indicators for district health au- was lower in Greater London than the sur- thorities suggest that stroke mortality for rounding South East Region in all age Greater London relative to other areas may bands over 45. It has been declining in vary with age.5 both areas but the rate ofdecline has been The aim of this study was to examine time significantly slower in Greater London trends for stroke mortality in Greater London (p<0.0001).
    [Show full text]
  • Transport with So Many Ways to Get to and Around London, Doing Business Here Has Never Been Easier
    Transport With so many ways to get to and around London, doing business here has never been easier First Capital Connect runs up to four trains an hour to Blackfriars/London Bridge. Fares from £8.90 single; journey time 35 mins. firstcapitalconnect.co.uk To London by coach There is an hourly coach service to Victoria Coach Station run by National Express Airport. Fares from £7.30 single; journey time 1 hour 20 mins. nationalexpress.com London Heathrow Airport T: +44 (0)844 335 1801 baa.com To London by Tube The Piccadilly line connects all five terminals with central London. Fares from £4 single (from £2.20 with an Oyster card); journey time about an hour. tfl.gov.uk/tube To London by rail The Heathrow Express runs four non- Greater London & airport locations stop trains an hour to and from London Paddington station. Fares from £16.50 single; journey time 15-20 mins. Transport for London (TfL) Travelcards are not valid This section details the various types Getting here on this service. of transport available in London, providing heathrowexpress.com information on how to get to the city On arrival from the airports, and how to get around Heathrow Connect runs between once in town. There are also listings for London City Airport Heathrow and Paddington via five stations transport companies, whether travelling T: +44 (0)20 7646 0088 in west London. Fares from £7.40 single. by road, rail, river, or even by bike or on londoncityairport.com Trains run every 30 mins; journey time foot. See the Transport & Sightseeing around 25 mins.
    [Show full text]
  • South East Greater London Wales East of England West
    2021 REVALUATION: REGIONAL WINNERS & LOSERS Roll over the region titles below to find out These figures have been extracted from CoStar and are based on the anticipated changes in rateable values within each individual Administrative area across England and Wales. The extent of your change in rateable value will depend on the exact location of your property. Even if you are in an area where rateable values are predicted to fall, it is important to have your assessment verified, as there may still be opportunities to secure further reductions. For a detailed analysis of the likely impact of the 2021 revaluation and advice on what to do next, please contact a member of our Business Rates team. Email us at [email protected] or visit us at lsh.co.uk INDUSTRIAL REGION AVERAGE GROWTH MIN GROWTH MIN LOCATION MAX GROWTH MAX LOCATION WALES 27% 17% Blaenau Gwent 50% Neath Port Talbot GREATER LONDON 38% 34% Hackney 44% Harrow SOUTH EAST 27% 14% Dover 44% Milton Keynes EAST OF ENGLAND 31% 18% South Norfolk 44% Brentwood EAST MIDLANDS 27% 16% Derby 36% Hinckley NORTH WEST 25% 15% Barrow-In-Furness 35% Liverpool SOUTH WEST 19% 14% West Devon 27% Swindon WEST MIDLANDS 19% 14% Tamworth 26% Solihull NORTH EAST 18% 14% South Tyneside 26% Darlington YORKSHIRE 16% 11% Doncaster 21% Hull & THE HUMBER ALL UK AVG 25% OFFICE REGION AVERAGE GROWTH MIN GROWTH MIN LOCATION MAX GROWTH MAX LOCATION EAST OF ENGLAND 23% 9% Norwich 44% Watford SOUTH WEST 18% 7% Devon 41% Bristol Core GREATER LONDON 20% 5% Covent Garden 37% Sutton SOUTH EAST 25% 17% Reading Central 33%
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Surface Access Strategy 2012-2017
    Airport Surface Access Strategy 2012-2017 Contents 1 Introduction 4 APPENDIX A – LOCAL PUBLIC TRANSPORT SERVICES 36 2 Vision 6 APPENDIX B – TRAFFIC FLOWS 40 3 Policy Context 8 APPENDIX C – PASSENGER SURFACE ACCESS 41 3.2 National 8 C.1 Passenger Numbers 41 3.3 Local 8 C.2 Passenger Journeys by time of day 41 C.3 CAA Passenger Survey 43 4 London Luton Airport Today 10 C.4 Passenger Mode Shares 44 4.2 Bus and Coach 10 C.5 Passenger Mode Shares – by journey purpose and UK/non-UK origin 44 4.3 Rail 12 C.6 Passenger Catchment 46 4.4 On-site Bus Services 14 C.7 Passenger Mode Shares – by catchment 48 4.5 Road Access 14 C.8 Car and Taxi Use – by catchment 52 4.6 Car Parking 17 4.7 Taxis 18 APPENDIX D – STAFF SURFACE ACCESS 54 4.8 Walking and Cycling 18 D.1 Introduction 54 4.9 Accessibility 18 D.2 Staff Journeys – by time of day 54 4.10 Central Terminal Area 18 D.3 Staff Mode Shares 55 4.11 Onward Travel Centre 18 D.4 Staff Catchment 57 4.12 Staff Travelcard Scheme 19 D.5 Staff Mode Shares – by catchment 58 4.13 Employee Car Share Scheme 19 APPENDIX E – DfT ASAS GUIDANCE (1999) 59 5 Travel Patterns Today 20 5.1 Passenger Numbers 20 5.2 Passenger Mode Shares 20 5.3 Comparative Performance 22 5.4 Passenger Catchment 23 5.5 Achieving Mode Shift 24 5.6 Staff Travel 24 6 Objectives and Action Plans 26 6.2 Passengers 26 6.3 Staff 30 7 Stakeholder Engagement, Consultation and Monitoring 32 7.1 Stakeholder Engagement and Consultation 32 7.2 Airport Transport Forum 32 7.3 Monitoring 32 7.4 Reporting on Progress 34 2 Airport Surface Access Strategy 2012-2017 Contents 3 London Luton Airport is the fi fth busiest “passenger airport in the UK, with excellent transport links connecting it to London, the South East, the East of“ England Introduction and the South Midlands 11.1.1 London Luton Airport is the fi fth 1.1.3 This ASAS sets out challenging 1.1.5 The Strategy is divided into the busiest passenger airport in the new targets, with a view to building on following sections: UK, with excellent transport links this success.
    [Show full text]
  • Land Use United Kingdom
    The Governance of Land Use United Kingdom The planning system Levels of government and their responsibilities The United Kingdom is a unitary state with three devolved governments in Northern Ireland, Wales and Scotland, respectively. At the local level, 389 local authorities with varying status and powers exist. Among them are 27 county councils, which exist in parts of England and are strictly speaking an intermediate level of government because they operate above other local authorities, except where they are unitary authorities. The UK government is responsible for allocating funds to local authorities and for preparing the National Planning Policy Framework in England. It can also facilitate important infrastructure projects through specific legislation or by placing them under direct ministerial control. The Welsh and Scottish governments have been granted far reaching powers regarding land-use policies. They enact national spatial planning frameworks that structure the planning system in their territories. The Scottish government also prepares a Scottish Land Use Strategy, the only such document in the United Kingdom. Furthermore, both governments decide about appeals against local planning decisions and have the power to fast track infrastructure project in their territories. Local authorities are responsible for local land-use planning and public housing. They also decide on planning applications. Some local authorities have contracted land-use planning out to the private sector. County councils as an intermediate level of government are – where they exist – responsible for strategic planning and for planning applications related to waste disposal sites, mineral extraction and county owned land. In London, the Greater London Authority has a distinct legal status as a metropolitan authority and is among other issues responsible for transport and for the preparation of the London Plan, a strategic plan that provides binding guidelines to local authorities in the greater London area.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater London Authority
    GREATER LONDON AUTHORITY NOTICE OF ELECTION ELECTION OF MAYOR OF LONDON AND LONDON-WIDE MEMBERS OF THE LONDON ASSEMBLY DATE OF THE POLL 1. In the event of a contest, the date of the poll will be Thursday, 6 May 2021. NOMINATION PAPERS 2. Nomination papers to stand in the elections for the Mayor of London and the 11 London-wide Members (party list and individual) of the London Assembly may be obtained from the office of the Greater London Returning Officer, City Hall, The Queen’s Walk, More London, London SE1 2AA on working days between 9am and 4.30pm. Nomination packs can be downloaded at: https://www.londonelects.org.uk/im-candidate/nominations DELIVERY OF NOMINATION PAPERS 3. Completed nomination papers must be delivered in person and hardcopy (not by email) to the Greater London Returning Officer, Committee Room 1, Lower Ground Floor, City Hall, The Queen’s Walk, More London, London SE1 2AA, on any weekday from the date of this notice between 9am and 4.30pm, but by no later than 4pm on Tuesday 30 March 2021. PAYMENT OF DEPOSITS 4. The deposit for each Mayoral candidate is £10,000. The deposit for each party list or individual candidate in the election of London-wide Members is £5,000. Payment should be made by electronic transfer into the GLA Income Account (Royal Bank of Scotland; sort code 16-00-38; account number 00780445). Payment can also be made by cash or bankers draft (banks operating in the UK only). Cleared funds must be received by 4pm on Tuesday 30 March 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • A Mayor and Assembly for London: 10 Years On
    2 July 2010 A Mayor and Assembly for London: 10 years on Tony Travers and Christine Whitehead A brief history… It is 10 years since the Greater London Authority was created as a metropolitan or regional tier of government for London. There have been five different arrangements of ‘upper tier’ government in the capital since the Metropolitan Board of Works (MBW) was created in 1855 to build infrastructure. The MBW was succeeded by the London County Council (LCC), a powerful authority for the inner part of the contemporary city. Within this area 28 metropolitan boroughs and the City of London delivered ‘local’ services. Two factors were particularly important in influencing the progress of London’s government. First, the physical expansion of the city created demands for provision across a wider area than the City of London’s original and long-evolved ‘square mile’. The Metropolitan Police Service was created by the government in 1829 to meet the law and order requirements of a fast-growing city. The squalor and chaos of the London of the 1850s prompted Parliament to legislate for London’s first-ever metropolitan government, an indirectly-elected entity. Further physical expansion between the end of the 19 th century and 1939 generated a debate about the need for a ‘Greater London’ government 1. The second important factor in determining the kinds of institutions that emerged was the local power and parochialism of both the City of London and the parish-based or ad hoc bodies that developed to deliver services in the absence of a city-wide government.
    [Show full text]
  • Commuting in London and the South East – Some Background Trends
    This is a repository copy of Commuting in London and the South East – Some Background Trends.. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/2348/ Monograph: Mackett, R.L., Madden, M. and Nash, C.A. (1985) Commuting in London and the South East – Some Background Trends. Working Paper. Institute of Transport Studies, University of Leeds , Leeds, UK. Working Paper 203 Reuse See Attached Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ White Rose Research Online http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Institute of Transport Studies University of Leeds This is an ITS Working Paper produced and published by the University of Leeds. ITS Working Papers are intended to provide information and encourage discussion on a topic in advance of formal publication. They represent only the views of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the views or approval of the sponsors. White Rose Repository URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/2348/ Published paper Mackett, R.L., Madden, M., Nash, C.A. (1985) Commuting in London and the South East – Some Background Trends. Institute of Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Working Paper 203 White Rose Consortium ePrints Repository [email protected] 1. Introduction The past two decades have seen some significant changes in the pattern of commuting to Central London. The total number of passengers entering Central London by all modes in the morning peak has dropped by some 20% (Fig.2).
    [Show full text]
  • The Planning Game—English Style Or the Greater London Development Plan, 7 Urb
    Urban Law Annual ; Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law Volume 7 January 1974 The lP anning game—English Style or the Greater London Development Plan Victor Moore Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_urbanlaw Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Victor Moore, The Planning game—English Style or the Greater London Development Plan, 7 Urb. L. Ann. 57 (1974) Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_urbanlaw/vol7/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Urban Law Annual ; Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE PLANNING GAME-ENGLISH STYLE OR THE GREATER LONDON DEVELOPMENT PLAN VICTOR MOORE* Anglophiles will be aware that since the statute Quia Emptores in the year 1290, no single piece of legislation has made as great an im- pact on English land law as that brought about by the Town and Country Planning Act of 1947.1 The lynchpin of that legislation, which gave to England its first comprehensive statutory machinery for controlling land use, was that no landowner could develop his land without first obtaining permission from the local planning authority.2 The content of the development plan which local plan- ning authorities were required to prepare for their areas determined whether permission would be granted, or granted subject to condi- tions, or whether the planning authority would begin cease and desist proceedings if development commenced without permission.' The history of these development plans is well known.
    [Show full text]
  • The Greater London (Restriction of Goods Vehicles) Traffic Order 1985
    GREATER LONDON COUNCIL TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT ORDER 1985 No. 343 The Greater London (Restriction of Goods Vehicles) Traffic Order 1985 Made 15 July 1985 Coming into operation 16 December 1985 As amended to January 2010 by 9 Amendment Orders The Greater London Council (hereinafter called ‘the Council’), after consulting the Commissioner of City of London Police, the Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis, the Common Council of the City of London, and the Councils of all the London Boroughs, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 6 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984, and of all other powers thereunto enabling hereby make the following Order:- 1. This Order shall come into operation on 16 December 1985 and may be cited as the Greater London (Restriction of Goods Vehicles) Traffic Order 1985. 2.– (1) In this Order:– “Blackwall Tunnel Northern Approach” has the same meaning as in the Tower Hamlets (Prescribed Routes) (No. 5) Traffic Order 1979; “East Cross Route” has the same meaning as in the Hackney and Tower Hamlets (Various Prohibitions and Restrictions) (No. 1) Traffic Order 1979; “Enactment” means any enactment, whether public, general or local, and includes any order, byelaw, rule, regulation, scheme or other instrument having effect by virtue of an enactment and any reference in this Order to any enactment shall be construed as a reference to that enactment as amended, applied, consolidated, re-enacted by or as having effect by virtue of any subsequent enactment; “Highway Maintainable at the Public Expense” has the same
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED KINGDOM Europe UNITARY COUNTRY
    UNITED KINGDOM EUROPe UNITARY COUNTRY Basic socio-economic indicators Income group - HIGH INCOME: OECD Local currency - Pound Sterling (GBP) Population and geography Economic data AREA: 242 509 km2 GDP: 2 597.4 billion (current PPP international dollars) i.e. 40 210 dollars per inhabitant (2014) POPULATION: million inhabitants (2014), 64.597 REAL GDP GROWTH: 2.9% (2014 vs 2013) an increase of 0.7% per year (2010-14) UNEMPLOYMENT RATE: 6.1% (2014) 2 DENSITY: 266 inhabitants/km FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENT, NET INFLOWS (FDI): 45 457 (BoP, current USD millions, 2014) URBAN POPULATION: 82.3% of national population GROSS FIXED CAPITAL FORMATION (GFCF): 17% of GDP (2014) CAPITAL CITY: London (16% of national population) HUMAN DEVELOPMENT INDEX: 0.907 (very high), rank 14 Sources: OECD, Eurostat, World Bank, UNDP, ILO Territorial organisation and subnational government RESPONSABILITIES MUNICIPAL LEVEL INTERMEDIATE LEVEL REGIONAL OR STATE LEVEL TOTAL NUMBER OF SNGs 389 27 3 419 local authorities County councils and Greater Devolved nations Average municipal size: London Authority 166 060 inhabitantS Main features of territorial organisation. The United Kingdom is a unitary state composed of four constituent countries (England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales) and three devolved administrations (Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales), having their own elected assembly and government since the devolution process in 1998. The project of devolution of limited political powers to elected regional assemblies in England has been suspended indefinitely following the rejection of the first referendum held in the North-East of England in 2004. The territorial organisation is highly complex and differs greatly between the different countries.
    [Show full text]
  • RISHI SUNAK SARATHA RAJESWARAN a Portrait of Modern Britain Rishi Sunak Saratha Rajeswaran
    A PORTRAIT OF MODERN BRITAIN RISHI SUNAK SARATHA RAJESWARAN A Portrait of Modern Britain Rishi Sunak Saratha Rajeswaran Policy Exchange is the UK’s leading think tank. We are an educational charity whose mission is to develop and promote new policy ideas that will deliver better public services, a stronger society and a more dynamic economy. Registered charity no: 1096300. Policy Exchange is committed to an evidence-based approach to policy development. We work in partnership with academics and other experts and commission major studies involving thorough empirical research of alternative policy outcomes. We believe that the policy experience of other countries offers important lessons for government in the UK. We also believe that government has much to learn from business and the voluntary sector. Trustees Daniel Finkelstein (Chairman of the Board), Richard Ehrman (Deputy Chair), Theodore Agnew, Richard Briance, Simon Brocklebank-Fowler, Robin Edwards, Virginia Fraser, David Frum, Edward Heathcoat Amory, David Meller, Krishna Rao, George Robinson, Robert Rosenkranz, Charles Stewart-Smith and Simon Wolfson About the Authors Rishi Sunak is Head of Policy Exchange’s new Black and Minority Ethnic (BME) Research Unit. Prior to joining Policy Exchange, Rishi worked for over a decade in business, co-founding a firm that invests in the UK and abroad. He is currently a director of Catamaran Ventures, a family-run firm, backing and serving on the boards of various British SMEs. He worked with the Los Angeles Fund for Public Education to use new technology to raise standards in schools. He is a Board Member of the Boys and Girls Club in Santa Monica, California and a Governor of the East London Science School, a new free school based in Newham.
    [Show full text]