Unit 1 Text; The Origins of the Pledge of Allegiance In 1892 the popular Youth’s Companion magazine made a lot of money selling American flags to schools. For each 10 subscriptions a school bought of the magazine they received a flag for the classrooms. As magazines and flag sales slowed it was decided that the magazine would take part in the coming 400th anniversary of Columbus’ arrival in the New World. A ceremony would take place honoring Columbus and the Flag, Francis Bellamy a Baptist minister and Christian Socialist wrote the original "Pledge of Allegiance" and the flag ceremony became part of the ceremony organized by James B. Upham, to promote American nationalism, the loyalty and devotion to one’s nation. Bellamy's original pledge, which is a binding promise or agreement to do something, and included a salute, read as follows: I pledge allegiance to my Flag and the Republic for which it stands, one nation indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. Continuing in its popularity, by 1923, the National Flag Conference called for the words "my Flag" to be changed to "the Flag of", so that new immigrants would not confuse loyalties between their birth countries and the U.S. The words "of America" was added a year later. The officially recognized the Pledge, as part of the U.S. Flag Code on June 22, 1942, as I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. The Flag Code made some practices, in disrespectful to the flag, the national anthem, and the pledge illegal, but provided no punishment for any violations. Addition of "under God" Louis A. Bowman was the first to initiate the addition of "under God" to the Pledge. At a meeting on February 12, 1948, Lincoln's Birthday, he led the meeting in swearing of the Pledge with two words added, "under God." He stated that the usage came from Lincoln's Gettysburg Address. When Lincoln said “that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom.” In 1952, Holger Langmack wrote a letter to President Truman suggesting the words "under God" be formally included in the Pledge of Allegiance. In 1953 Representative Louis Rabaut of Michigan sponsored a a congressional resolution, which did not pass, to add the words "under God" to the Pledge. On February 7, 1954, with President Dwight D. Eisenhower sitting in Lincoln's pew of the New York Avenue Presbyterian Church, the pastor, George Docherty, delivered a sermon based on the Gettysburg Address including the words under God. Docherty convinced Eisenhower to do something to add the words to the Pledge. The next day, February 8, 1954, Rep. Charles Oakman, introduced a bill, that was passed, and Eisenhower signed the bill into law on Flag Day, June 14, 1954. Many others also saw the introduction of "under God" during the Cold War, as a way to differentiate the U.S. from the atheism, the disbelief in the existence of a god, that was held by the Communist Soviet Unions. Now the pledge said "I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all." The Pledge and Controversy Requiring or promoting the Pledge by the government has drawn many criticism and legal challenges. One objection states that in a democratic republic, a government where the citizens decide issues of power through elected representatives, which is built on the principle of freedom of dissent, the right to differ in opinion with other, should not require its citizens to “pledge” allegiance, the devoting of or giving of one’s loyalty to a person, group, cause or government. They also argued that the First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects one's right to refrain from speaking or even standing (standing for the pledge can be seen to mean that you agree with the pledge) if one does not want to. Another objection lies in the fact that the people who are most likely to be forced to recite the Pledge every day, small children in schools, cannot really give their consent or even completely understand the Pledge they are taking. Many other objections have been raised since the addition of the phrase "under God" to the Pledge in 1954. Some critics contend that a government requiring or promoting this phrase violates protections against the establishment of religion which is protected by the of the First Amendment. In 1940 the Supreme Court, in the case of Minersville School District v. Gobitis, the court ruled that students in public schools, including those in that case could be compelled to Pledge to the Flag. The Gobitis family argued that taking a pledge to a flag to be, based on their religious beliefs a Johova Witnesses to be idolatry, the worship of a physical object as a god, and compelling to do so by the government, to swear a Pledge to be a violation of their first amendment rights of religious freedom. Continuing Legal Action and Court Decisions In 1943 the Supreme Court reversed the Minersville Case, ruling in West Virginia v. Barnette that public school students are not required to say the Pledge, saying that "compulsory unification of opinion" the making of everyone to believe the same thing, violates the 1st Amendment right to free speech which includes the right to speak and to not speak. Later, the Court would hold that students are also not required to stand for the Pledge as standing could inferred to mean the agree with the words of the pledge. In a 2002 case brought by an atheist , whose daughter was being taught and required to recite the Pledge in school, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the phrase "under God" to be an unconstitutional endorsement of monotheism, the belief in one god. , In 2004, the Supreme Court reversed the lower court decision saying that schools teaching and conducting the pledge did not violate an individuals rights. On January 3, 2005, a new suit was filed which resulted in a court order stating that, upon proper motion, the school district would be enjoined or stopped from continuing their practices of leading children in the Pledge pending a legal challenge. In response to this in 2005 Congress introduced a bill which would have stripped the Supreme Court and most federal courts, of their power to consider any legal challenges to the government requiring or promoting the Pledge of Allegiance. Passed by the House, this bill failed in the Senate's. Supporters of the bill argued that the Constitution gives Congress' the power to regulate the jurisdiction, what cases they can hear, of the federal courts. Opponents questioned whether Congress has the authority to prevent the Supreme Court from hearing any claims based on the violation of the Bill of Rights. A Constitutional lawyer, objected to the attempt to strip the court of it’s power to hear cases and making rulings in regards to the Pledge of Allegiance by saying "The ‘Pledge Protection Act’ is a shameful effort to strip our federal courts of their ability to protect the rights of all Americans. By removing the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, from cases involving the Pledge, sets a dangerous precedent; threatening religious liberty. Today, the issue is the Pledge of Allegiance, but tomorrow it could be reproductive rights, civil rights, or any other fundamental concern." In 2006, in the Florida case Frazier v. Alexandre, a federal district court ruled that a 1942 state law requiring students to stand and recite the Pledge of Allegiance violates the 1st and 14th Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. As a result, a Florida school district was ordered to pay $32,500 to a student who chose not to say the pledge and was ridiculed and called "unpatriotic" by a teacher. In 2009, a Montgomery County, Maryland, teacher berated and had school police remove a 13-year-old girl who refused to say the Pledge of Allegiance in the classroom. The student's mother, sued and received an apology from the teacher, as state law and the school's student handbook both prohibit students from being forced to recite the Pledge. In 2010, the U.S. Court of Appeals, upheld the words "under God" In the case of Newdow v. Rio Linda Union School District a 2–1 decision, ruled that the words were of a "ceremonial and patriotic nature" and did not constitute an establishment of religion. One judge dissented, writing that "the state-directed, teacher-led daily recitation in public schools of the amended 'under God' version of the Pledge of Allegiance... violates the Establishment Clause of the Constitution." On November 12, 2010, in a unanimous decision, the federal appeals court affirmed a ruling by a New Hampshire federal court, that found that the reference to God doesn't violate a students' rights. A U.S. Supreme Court appeal of this decision was denied in June 2011 affirming or agreeing with the lower court. About half the states, including Georgia, encourage schools to recite the pledge. Unit 1; The Pledge of Allegiance SSCG5 The student will demonstrate knowledge of the federal system of government described in the United States Constitution. g. Explain the meaning of the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag of the United States. Directions; Write your name, the date, and period, across the top. Begin work on the back of this sheet and continue on a separate sheet of paper, as needed and attached to the back of this sheet for turn in.

1. Vocabulary; Research the following concepts, For each write the word and the definition of each as found in the text: nationalism, pledge, Democratic-Republic, allegiance, consent, establishment, idolatry, compulsory unification of opinion, monotheism, enjoined, jurisdiction, affirming. 2. Answer the following using Content Questions Higher Order Thinking Questions Why did Francis Bellamy write the Pledge of Why do you think the pledge was originally written? Allegiance? Why would the National Flag Conference want to What changes did the National Flag Conference of make it clear about whose flag was being pledged? 1923 call for? How would adding the words “under God” make the From where did the phrase “under God” come from? pledge more controversial?

Graphic Organizer; Complete the graphic Organizer below; compare the essential features of each form of government. Court Cases and the Pledge 1940 1943 2002 2004 2006 2009 2011

Unit 2 Dialogue #2; Pledge of Allegiance What Connecting theme relates to the Pledge; Beliefs and Values; beliefs and values of a society influence the social political and economic decisions

Why would we say a pledge of Allegiance?

How would saying the Pledge make things better?

How would saying the Pledge make things worse?

Unit 1 Discussion #2 The Pledge of Allegiance SSCG5 The student will demonstrate knowledge of the federal system of government described in the United States Constitution. g. Explain the meaning of the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag of the United States.

I - -

Pledge - -

Allegiance - -

To the Flag - -

United - -

States - -

And to the Republic - -

For which it stands

One Nation - -

Indivisible - -

With Liberty - -

And Justice - -

For All --

Unit 2 Dialogue #2; Pledge of Allegiance What Connecting theme relates to the Pledge; Beliefs and Values; beliefs and values of a society influence the social political and economic decisions

Why would we say a pledge of Allegiance?

How would saying the Pledge make things better?

How would saying the Pledge make things worse?

SSCG5 The student will demonstrate knowledge of the federal system of government described in the United States Constitution. g. Explain the meaning of the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag of the United States.

I - - Me; an individual; a committee of one.

Pledge - - Dedicate all of my worldly goods to give without self-pity.

Allegiance - - My love and my devotion.

To the Flag - - Our standard; Old Glory ; a symbol of Freedom; wherever she waves there is respect, because your loyalty has given her a dignity that shouts, Freedom is everybody's job.

United - - That means that we have all come together.

States - - Individual communities that have united into forty-eight great states. Forty-eight individual communities with pride and dignity and purpose. All divided with imaginary boundaries, yet united to a common purpose, and that is love for country.

And to the Republic - - Republic--a state in which sovereign power is invested in representatives chosen by the people to govern. And government is the people; and it's from the people to the leaders, not from the leaders to the people.

For which it stands - - Those things it will stand up for and protect and defend

One Nation - - One Nation--meaning, so blessed by God. Under God - -

Indivisible - - Incapable of being divided.

With Liberty - - Which is Freedom; the right of power to live one's own life, without threats, fear, or some sort of retaliation.

And Justice - - The principle, or qualities, of dealing fairly with others.

For All - - For All--which means, boys and girls, it's as much your country as it is mine.