DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report 2009 Report Annual This Is a Story of Progress Through and Systematic Work to Delivering Reach Our Long-Term Goals

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Report 2009 Report Annual This Is a Story of Progress Through and Systematic Work to Delivering Reach Our Long-Term Goals Annual Report 2009 This is a story of progress through and systematic work to Delivering reach our long-term goals. Confident in our competence, competence we always strive to deliver better results. Read how our story evolves in 2010 and beyond. Domicile Espoo, Business ID 1463611-4 Annual Report 2009 Investor information Annual General Meeting Investor relations at Fortum The Annual General Meeting of Fortum Mika Paloranta, Vice President, Corporation will be held on Thursday, Investor Relations, 25 March 2010 at 1:00 EET at the tel. +358 (0)10 452 4138, Finlandia Hall, address: Mannerheimintie fax +358 (0) 10 452 4176, 13 e, 00100 Helsinki. The reception of e-mail: [email protected] shareholders who have registered for the meeting will commence at 12:00 EET. Rauno Tiihonen, Manager, Investor Relations, Payment of dividends tel. +358 (0)10 453 6150, The Board of Directors proposes to the fax +358 (0) 10 452 4176, Fortum is a leading energy company focusing on the Nordic Annual General Meeting that Fortum e-mail: [email protected] countries, Russia and the Baltic Rim area. Activities cover Corporation pay a cash dividend of EUR 1.00 per share for 2009, totalling EUR 888 Ordering financial information the generation, distribution and sale of electricity and heat million based on the number of regis- Financial documents can be obtained and the operation and maintenance of power plants. Our tered shares as of 2 February 2010. from Fortum Corporation, Mail Room, POB 1, FI-00048, FORTUM, Finland, vision is to be the benchmark power and heat company Fortum share basics tel. +358 (0)10 452 9151, e-mail: excelling in sustainability. Listed on NASDAQ OMX Helsinki [email protected] Trading ticker: FUM1V Number of shares, 2 February 2010: Investor information is available online 888,367,045 at www.fortum.com/investors In 2009, Fortum’s sales totalled EUR 5.4 billion and oper- Sector: Utilities ating profit was EUR 1.8 billion. The company employs approximately 11,500 people. Fortum’s shares are quoted on NASDAQ OMX Helsinki. Annual Report 2009 Graphic design, illustrations and production: Miltton Oy Photographs: Tomi Parkkonen (cover, 7, 9, 11, 17, 78–81), Finnish Press Agency (inner front cover), Andrey Semenov (12), Petri Hakala (14), Stefan Sjödin (15, 30, 82), Fortum (15), Pekka Koski, Veho (15), Loviisan voimalaitos (15, 40), Echelon & Fortum (15), Johner (22), Natalia Zaitseva (52), Fennopress (64). Paper: Invercote Creato 300 g, Galerie Art Matt 130/100 g. Printing: Libris Oy 2010 Inner cover: CO2-free* hydropower is one of the most used sources of energy in the Nordic countries. Cover: A detail from the new CHP plant in Espoo, Finland. The plant was inagurated in December 2009. FORTUM CORPORATION 2009 1 Annual Report 2009 Fortum in brief 02 CHAPTER 5: DIVISIONS 53 Financial summary 04 Power 54 Competences ‘09 06 Heat 56 Electricity Solutions and Distribution: Distribution 58 CHAPTER 1: FORTUM IN 2009 15 Electricity Solutions and Distribution: Markets 60 Interview with the CEO 16 Russia 62 Strategy 19 CHAPTER 6: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 65 CHAPTER 2: THE WORLD AROUND US 23 Corporate Governance Statement 66 Market development 24 Remuneration 74 Board of Directors 78 CHAPTER 3: INVESTING IN THE FUTURE 31 Group management 80 Investments 32 Trends 36 CHAPTER 7: FORTUM FINANCIALS 2009 82 Research & development activities 38 Operating and financial review 84 Consolidated financial statements 108 CHAPTER 4: SUSTAINABILITY 41 Notes to the consolidated financial statements 113 Environmental responsibility 42 Key figures 174 Social responsibility 46 Parent company financial statements, Finnish GAAP (FAS) 181 *CO2-free in this report refers Personnel 48 Proposal for the distribution of earnings 187 to the emissions during the Economic responsibility 50 Auditor’s report 188 production of wind, hydro and nuclear power as well as Statement by the Supervisory Board 189 production with biomass. Quarterly financial informa†ion 190 2 ANNUAL REPORT 2009 FORTUM CORPORATION 2009 Fortum in brief Fortum focuses on the Nordic, Russian Norway Russia and Baltic Rim markets where it has developed a good platform for future Heat sales 0.2 TWh Power generation capacity 2,785 MW growth. Distribution, customers 99,500 Heat sales 25.6 TWh Share of electricity customers 2.7% Employees 4,853 Employees 143 Distribution network Russia OAO Fortum Sweden Estonia Power generation capacity 5,885 MW Heat sales 1.0 TWh Heat sales 9.8 TWh Distribution, customers 24,100 Distribution, customers 894,700 Employees 357 Sweden Share of electricity customers 11.4% Finland Russia TGC-1 Employees 2,445 Norway Estonia Finland Lithuania Latvia Power generation capacity 5,096 MW Heat sales 0.1 TWh Lithuania Heat sales 8.0 TWh Employees 72 Distribution, customers 610,700 Share of electricity customers 13.4% Employees 2,700 Poland Poland Latvia Heat sales 3.7 TWh Heat sales 0.2 TWh Employees 756 Employees 98 FORTUM CORPORATION 2009 FORTUM IN BRIEF 3 Group business structure Power Heat Electricity Russia Division Division Solutions Division and Distribution Division The Power Division consists of Fortum’s The Heat Division consists of combined The Electricity Solutions and Distribu- The Russia Division consists of power power generation, physical operation heat and power generation, district tion Division is responsible for Fortum’s and heat generation and sales in and trading, operation, maintenance heating activities and business-to- electricity sales, solutions and distribu- Russia. It includes OAO Fortum and and development of power plants business heating solutions. tion activities. The division consists of Fortum’s over 25% holding in TGC-1. as well as expert services for power two business areas: Distribution and producers. Markets. Sales, EUR 5,435 million Comparable operating profit, Net assets, EUR 15,347 million Employees, 31 Dec, 11,613 EUR 1,888 million Other Markets Other Other Russia Distribution 1% Russia 1% 2% 4% Power 9% 14% 15% Russia 27% –1% Markets Power Power Heat 1% 36% 21% 37% 12% Other Russia Markets –4% 35% 21% Distribution 19% 12% 78% Heat Distribution Power 20% 25% 5% 10% Heat Heat Markets Distribution 4 ANNUAL REPORT 2009 FORTUM CORPORATION 2009 Operating profit excluding Comparable operating profit non-recurring items, fair plus profit from associated value changes of derivatives companies divided by not getting hedge accounting comparable net assets. Financial summary and nuclear fund adjustment. Key financial figures Key figures by division / business area Sales Comparable operating profit Comparable RONA% EUR million or as indicated 2009 2008 2007 EUR million or as indicated 2009 2008 2007 2009 2008 2007 2009 2008 2007 Sales 5,435 5,636 4,479 Power 2,596 2,892 2,350 1,469 1,528 1,095 26.6 28.0 18.9 EBITDA 2,292 2,478 2,298 Heat 1,394 1,466 1,356 227 250 290 7.2 7.3 9.2 Operating profit 1,782 1,963 1,847 Distribution 800 789 769 262 248 231 8.6 8.2 7.6 Comparable operating profit 1,888 1,845 1,564 Markets 1,449 1,922 1,683 22 –33 –1 18.6 –15.3 –0.6 Profit for the period, owners of the parent 1,312 1,542 1,552 Russia 623 489 - –26 –92 - –0.3 –3.8 0.0 Other 74 83 81 –66 –56 –51 –18.7 –1.7 –2.1 Capital employed 15,350 15,911 13,544 Eliminations –1,501 –2,005 –1,760 - - - Interest-bearing net debt 5,969 6,179 4,466 Total 5,435 5,636 4,479 1,888 1,845 1,564 Net debt / EBITDA (1 2.6 2.5 2.2 Return on capital employed, % (1 12.1 15.0 14.0 Return on shareholders’ equity, % (1 16.0 18.7 15.8 Capital expenditure 862 1,108 655 Gross investments in shares 67 1,516 317 Net cash from operating activities 2,264 2,002 1,670 1) Adjusted for REC and Lenenergo gains in 2007 Share key figures Sales, EUR million Operating profit,EUR million Return on capital employed, % EUR or as indicated 2009 2008 2007 Earnings per share 1.48 1.74 1.74 Cash flow per share 2.55 2.26 1.88 6,000 2,000 20 Equity per share 9.04 8.96 9.43 5,000 1,500 15 Dividend per share 1.00 (1 1.00 1.35 4,000 Current target Payout ratio, % 67.6 (1 57.5 77.6 3,000 1,000 10 Dividend yield, % 5.3 (1 6.6 4.4 2,000 500 5 1,000 1) Board of Directors’ proposal for the Annual 0 0 0 General Meeting on 25 March 2010 05 06 07 08 09 05 06 07 08 09 05 06 07 08 09 Discontinued oil operations Discontinued oil operations Discontinued oil operations Incl. REC and Lenenergo gains ˭ Key financial figures for the years 1998–2009 are presented in the Financial Statements, see pages 174–175. ˭ Definitions for the key figures are included on pages 179–180 in the Financial Statements. FORTUM CORPORATION 2009 FINANCIAL SUMMARY 5 Return on shareholders’ equity, % Net cash from operating activities, Capital expenditure and gross Interest-bearing net debt, EUR million EUR million investments in shares, EUR million 20 2,500 3,000 8,000 2,500 15 2,000 6,000 Current 2,000 target 1,500 10 1,500 4,000 1,000 1,000 5 2,000 500 500 0 0 0 0 05 06 07 08 09 05 06 07 08 09 05 06 07 08 09 05 06 07 08 09 Discontinued oil operations Discontinued oil operations Discontinued oil operations Incl. REC and Lenenergo gains Net debt / EBITDA Number of employees, 31 Dec Share quotations 2005–2009, Index 100 = quote on 3 January 2005 3.0 16,000 350 350 2.5 300 300 12,000 2.0 250 250 200 200 1.5 8,000 150 150 1.0 4,000 100 100 0.5 50 50 0 0 0 0 05 06 07 08 09 05 06 07 08 09 05 06 07 08 09 Continuing operations Fortum (Neste Oil spin-off adjusted) Adjusted with Lenenergo gains DJ European Utilities Total, incl.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Energy Sector in Sweden
    THE ENERGY SECTOR IN SWEDEN FLANDERS INVESTMENT & TRADE MARKET SURVEY /////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// THE ENERGY SECTOR IN SWEDEN Introduction to the market March 2020 //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// www.flandersinvestmentandtrade.com TABLE OF CONTENT: 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 2. The Swedish energy market ................................................................................................................................................... 4 3. Different types of renewable sources ............................................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Hydropower 6 3.2 Bioenergy 6 3.3 Nuclear power 7 3.4 Solar power 7 3.5 Wind power 8 3.6 Other sources 9 3.6.1 Wave power 9 3.6.2 Heat pumps 9 3.6.3 Body heat 9 4. Role of the government ........................................................................................................................................................... 10 4.1 carbon taxation 10 4.2 Green electricity certification 11 4.3 The Swedish Energy Agency 11 5. Long term goals ............................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Swedish Nuclear Power Policy
    The Research Project Energy Opinion in Sweden Department of Political Science University of Gothenburg Per Hedberg Sören Holmberg April 2008 Swedish Nuclear Power Policy A Compilation of Public Record Material History Nuclear Power “In Sweden, nuclear technology started in 1947, when AB Atomenergi was constituted to carry out a development programme decided by the Parliament. As a result, the first research reactor went critical in 1954. This was followed by the first prototype nuclear power plant (PHWR) Ågesta located to a rock cavern in a suburb of Stockholm. The Ågesta reactor was mainly used for district heating and operated from 1964 until 1974, when it was permanently shut down. The first commercial nuclear power plant Oskarshamn 1 was commissioned in 1972 and was followed by another eleven units sited at Barsebäck, Oskarshamn Ringhals and Forsmark in the time period up to 1985. The twelve commercial reactors constructed in Sweden comprise 9 BWRs (ASEA-ATOM design) and 3 PWRs (Westinghouse design). As a result of political decisions, the twin BWR units Barsebäck 1 and 2 were finally shut down in 1999 and 2005 respectively. In 2004, Studsvik Nuclear decided to permanently shut down the two research reactors (R2 and R2–0) at the Studsvik site. They were closed in June 2005. The decision was taken on economical grounds, the licences had recently been extended until 2014, subject to certain conditions. The reactors were mainly used for commercial materials testing purposes, isotope production, neutron source for research purposes, medical applications and higher education. They are currently under decommissioning.” (From DS 2007:30:11-12) “Nuclear policy was the major domestic policy issue during the mid and late1970s.
    [Show full text]
  • Radioactive Waste Management Programmes In
    RADIOACTIVE WASTE AND MANAGEMENT PROGRAMMES IN OECD/NEA MEMBER COUNTRIES SWEDEN [2010] NATIONAL NUCLEAR ENERGY CONTEXT Commercial utilisation of nuclear power in Sweden started in 1972 and as of 2010 ten nuclear power units supply electricity to the grid. In 2008, nuclear power generated 61,3 TWh of electricity, 42% of the total electricity generated in Sweden. Electricity supply by sources 2008 (158,7 TWh) (Source: Statistics Sweden) SOURCES, TYPES AND QUANTITIES OF WASTE Nuclear waste in arises from 12 commercial nuclear power plants at Barsebäck1, Forsmark, Oskarshamn and Ringhals and from research activities, mainly from Studsvik. Other radioactive wastes, so called small user waste, arise from a number of facilities using radioisotopes in medical, research and industrial applications. The long-term planning for the waste management programme is based on a reference scenario where the reactors in Ringhals and Forsmark are assumed to have an operating time of 50 years and OKG’s reactors 60 years. The quantity of spent fuel to be disposed of amounts to about 12,000 tonnes of uranium (counted as uranium). The total volume of decommissioning waste for all nuclear power plants as well as from research and demonstration facilities is estimated to 160 000 m3. 1 The two units in Barsebäck were permanently shut down 1999 and 2005 1(5) The LILW programme is aimed at disposing of all the low- and intermediate-level operational and decommissioning waste from the Swedish nuclear power programme. The reference scenario gives rise to a total of about 212 000 m3 of short-lived waste and about 8 700 m3 of long-lived waste from the nuclear power plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Balancing Supply and Demand in an Electricity System - the Case of Sweden
    DEGREE PROJECT IN THE FIELD OF TECHNOLOGY MECHANICAL ENGINEERING AND THE MAIN FIELD OF STUDY INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT, SECOND CYCLE, 30 CREDITS STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN 2018 Balancing Supply and Demand in an Electricity System - the Case of Sweden OSKAR MARED VICTOR PERSSON KTH ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT Balancing Supply and Demand in an Electricity System - the Case of Sweden Oskar Mared Victor Persson Master of Science Thesis TRITA-ITM-EX 2018:406 KTH Industrial Engineering and Management Industrial Management SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Balansera produktion och konsumtion i ett elsystem – en studie av Sverige Oskar Mared Victor Persson Examensarbete TRITA-ITM-EX 2018:406 KTH Industriell teknik och management Industriell ekonomi och organisation SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM Master of Science Thesis TRITA-ITM-EX 2018:406 Balancing Supply and Demand in an Electricity System - the Case of Sweden Oskar Mared Victor Persson Approved Examiner Supervisor 2018-05-28 Cali Nuur Thomas Sandberg Commissioner Contact person Mälarenergi AB Ulf Andersson Abstract In an electrical system there needs to be a constant balance between supply and demand of electricity and this is measured by the frequency in the grid. Due to the increasing awareness of climate change, more renewable energy resources have been introduced in the Swedish electricity system. This is, however, not solely positive since renewable energy sources are often of intermittent character which entails more imbalances between supply and demand. In addition, statistics and data show that the deviation in the frequency in the Nordic system has increased during the latest years. Thus, in this thesis, the issues regarding the frequency have been addressed by examining the demand for frequency control in the Swedish electricity system and what balancing efforts that can be carried out on a local level to contribute to a better balanced system.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuclear Energy Outlook – 2008
    Nuclear Energy Outlook – 2008 This Nuclear Energy Outlook (NEO) is the first of its kind and Nuclear Energy Outlook – 2008 responds to the renewed interest in nuclear energy by many OECD member countries. World energy demand continues to grow unabated and is leading to very serious concerns about security of supply, soaring energy prices and climate change stemming from fossil fuel consumption. Nuclear energy is being increasingly seen as having a role to play in addressing these concerns. This Outlook uses the most current data and statistics available and provides projections up to 2050 to consider growth scenarios and potential implications on the future use of nuclear energy. It also offers unique analyses and recommendations on the possible challenges that lie ahead. NUCLEAR ENERGY OUTLOOK Topics covered by the NEO include nuclear power’s current status and projected trends, environmental impacts, uranium resources and security of supply, costs, safety and regulation, radioactive 2008 waste management and decommissioning, non-proliferation and security, legal frameworks, infrastructure, stakeholder engagement, advanced reactors and advanced fuel cycles. www.nea.fr (66 2008 08 1 P) € 105 -:HSTCQE=UZYVUX: ISBN 978-92-64-05410-3 NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY Erratum Nuclear Energy Outlook 2008 ISBN 978-92-64-05410-3 Page 278 Table 9.2: “Annex 2” states whose ratification is necessary for entry into force of the CTBT* State Ratification State Ratification Algeria 11 July 2003 Israel Argentina 04 Dec. 1998 Italy 01 Feb. 1999 Australia 09 July 1998 Japan 08 July 1997 Austria 13 March 1998 Korea 24 Sept. 1999 Bangladesh 08 March 2000 Mexico 05 Oct.
    [Show full text]
  • Fortum Annual Report 2007
    Annual Report 2007 Review of Operations Responsibility on all fronts 1,000–1,800 MW nuclear power unit Responsibility for the future must be possibly to be built adjacent to the taken care of in many ways. At power existing two units in Loviisa. As part plants and other work places, but of the EIA, Fortum arranged several also in the ways we interact with the public citizens’ meetings in the town communities around us. For the sake of Loviisa. In these meetings, the of a secure energy future, in 2007, public has the opportunity to give Fortum continued its investments in feedback, ask questions and express new production capacity, improved their opinions directly to Fortum. The efficiency and environmental perform- EIA process proceeded as planned and ance and stepped-up its research will be finalised by summer 2008. and development work. Furthermore, better customer care and interaction Renewed hydropower with society through sponsorships and Refurbishing existing generation other support schemes were a focus. assets is an important investment area Fortum believes all these actions at Fortum. In 2007, the renewal of one together will make Fortum the energy of two hydro power plants in Avesta, The new Avestaforsen power plant was the biggest investment in hydro power in a decade in Sweden. supplier of choice. Sweden, was completed. The new Avestaforsen power plant replacing an Sweden in 2007 and will expand to Assessing new old plant was inaugurated in October. Finland in 2008. The concept brings nuclear power The new power plant will increase the added value to consumers in the form New investment possibilities are evalu- production in Avesta from 171 GWh to of advice, for instance on how to save ated continuously.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Profitability of Large-Scale PV Plants in Sweden
    DEGREE PROJECT IN ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT, SECOND CYCLE, 30 CREDITS STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN 2019 On the Profitability of Large- scale PV Plants in Sweden Site Selection, Grid Connection and Design ANNELIE WESTÉN KTH ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE KTH Royal Institute of Technology School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Degree project in Sustainable Energy Engineering On the Profitability of Large-scale PV Plants in Sweden: Site Selection, Grid Connection and Design Author: Annelie West´en Supervisor: Abolfazl Khodadadi, KTH Royal Institute of Technology Supervisor: Mikael Ronge, Eneo Solutions Examiner: Assoc. Prof. Mikael Amelin, KTH Royal Institute of Technology Abstract The market for large scale PV plants in Sweden is growing, with six PV plants of 1 MWp or more being installed today. The size of the newly installed plants has increased from 1 MWp to 5.5 MWp during the last 5 years. As the market and size of the plants continue to grow, larger investments, risks and possible profits will be built into the project. The site selection will affect the project in terms of power production, grid connection, plant design, land lease, among many things. This report focuses on how these early choices in the development of the project affect the profitability of the PV plant. A literature study has been conducted for in-depth knowledge of PV plants as well as the most important aspects of a pre-feasibility study. The literature study has a specific focus on the components and design of a PV plant, the grid connection, economy and future changes of the electricity price in Sweden.
    [Show full text]
  • FULLTEXT01.Pdf
    Blockchain technology in the future Swedish electricity system by Saga Carle Viktor Vifell Nilsson Master of Science Thesis TRITA-ITM-EX 2020:341 KTH Industrial Engineering and Management Industrial Management SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM 1 Blockchain i det framtida svenska elsystemet av Saga Carle Viktor Vifell Nilsson Examensarbete TRITA-ITM-EX 2020:341 KTH Industriell teknik och management Industriell ekonomi och organisation SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM 2 Abstract Blockchain, a distributed ledger technology, became publicly known when the cryptocurrency Bitcoin was introduced in 2009. As the financial value of cryptocurrencies increased, the interest for blockchain grew, leading other sectors to explore if blockchain could be used in other areas as well. One of these areas was the energy sector where the technology was predicted to transform the market by cutting out intermediaries with the use of peer-to-peer electricity trading. Today there are few successful commercial blockchain projects and the blockchain-hype is seemingly decreasing. It is, however, unclear if this is a natural part of the innovation process that follows the Gartner hype cycle or if the energy sector will reject the technology. This thesis aims to investigate the value characteristics of blockchain in the electricity system, and if these can add value to the future electricity system in Sweden. Firstly, to answer this question, a literature review is conducted to explore how blockchain has been applied in the electricity sector in earlier studies and what value the technology offered. Secondly, an interview study with 28 participants was conducted with the purpose to understand future predictions of how the electricity system in Sweden will be configured, and the energy sector’s understanding of blockchain technology.
    [Show full text]
  • An Endgame Problem in German Nuclear Power Plants? Markus Schöbel, Ralph Hertwig, & Jörg Rieskamp
    finding Phasing out a risky technology: An endgame problem in German nuclear power plants? Markus Schöbel, Ralph Hertwig, & Jörg Rieskamp abstract * Germany has twice decided to abandon nuclear energy. The first time, it set somewhat dynamic shutdown dates for plants before changing course. The second time, it set fixed shutdown dates. Game theory holds that awareness of shutdown dates may lead to endgame behavior, in which people at all levels of the industry behave more self-interestedly, thus potentially jeopardizing public safety, as the end dates approach. We examine whether such behavior is occurring in Germany by drawing on three sources of evidence: the public record, the frequencies of reportable safety-related events, and experimental data. The findings are inconclusive but suggest that the concerns merit consideration by policymakers in Germany or wherever policies need to be designed for the phaseout of dying industries. Counterintuitively, a policy designed to increase public safety may inadvertently create novel risks if it does not attend closely enough to the behavioral factors involved in its implementation. Schöbel, M., Hertwig, R., & Rieskamp, J. (2017). Phasing out a risky technology: An endgame problem in German nuclear power plants? Behavioral Science & Policy, 3(2), 41–54. a publication of the behavioral science & policy association 41 n the wake of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear Endgame Behavior in accident in Japan in March 2011, the German Finitely Repeated Games Igovernment decided—once again—to phase Generally speaking, game theory considers out the country’s use of nuclear energy. It conflict and cooperation between rational deci- was the second time the nation had opted to sionmakers.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of the Siting Process of Swedish Nuclear Power Plants Using GIS
    DEGREE PROJECT IN TECHNOLOGY, FIRST CYCLE, 15 CREDITS STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN 2020 Investigation of the siting process of Swedish nuclear power plants using GIS EGIL MORAST DANIEL WOLLBERG KTH ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE AND THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT Abstract In order to find the optimal placement for a nuclear power plant (NPP) many different factors have to be taken into consideration. Choosing the wrong location could result in higher construction costs and/or taking avoidable risks. GIS can be used to compare different spatial criteria efficiently. There are currently six nuclear reactors operating in Sweden, producing approximately 40% of the total electricity produced in the country every year. These reactors are divided over three nuclear power plants: Ringhals, Forsmark and Oskarshamn. The objective of this thesis is to evaluate the suitability of existing NPPs location in Sweden according to the current standards and guidelines and find good potential sites for a new hypothetical NPP in Sweden. The thesis is limited to investigate the geographical aspects of siting an NPP, and therefore economic decisions and law restrictions will have less impact on the end result. The methodology of the thesis is in line with International Atomic Energy Agency’s step by step siting procedure that includes a site survey in which candidate areas are derived using a set of ​ ​ ​ ​ exclusionary and avoidance criteria. This is followed by the comparison and ranking of these sites by implementing a suitability analysis in the site selection process to derive potential sites. The site ​ ​ ​ ​ survey process result in a map layer containing the candidate areas that fulfills the spectre of exclusionary and avoidance criteria set by the analyst.
    [Show full text]
  • Sweden: Policy and Licensing
    Radioactive waste management Sweden: Policy and licensing An update of projects and the new framework for regulation by Alf Larsson, Kjell Andersson, and Stig Wingefors In Sweden, as in other countries having large nuclear power programmes, radioactive waste management is Legislative and regulatory framework closely connected to the organizational structure of According to Sweden's Nuclear Activities Act (which nuclear power generation and the division of responsibility was introduced in 1984 and superseded the Atomic Energy Act of 1956), the producer of nuclear waste has between utilities and governmental organizations. the responsibility for its management and final disposal. Nuclear power in Sweden is generated in 12 stations To own and operate a nuclear power station, the owner located at four sites along the coastline. The Parliament's must carry out a research and development programme, decision following the 1980 referendum — that the the content of which must be presented to the Govern- ment every third year. The National Board for Spent nuclear power programme should be limited to 12 stations Nuclear Fuel has the important task of commenting on phased out by the year 2010 at the latest - affects the this programme and also of obtaining comments from nuclear waste volume. But it has no principal influence nuclear safety authorities. on the execution of the appropriate waste handling The Nuclear Activities Act regulates the safety of programme. nuclear power production and radioactive waste manage- ment. The Swedish Nuclear Power Inspectorate has the responsibility to supervise that organizations handling Reactor sites and Studsvik fissile material and radioactive waste implement the Under Sweden's Nuclear Activities Act, the stipulations of the law and corresponding regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Power and Joint Ownership: Evidence from Nuclear Plants in Sweden
    IFN Working Paper No. 1113, 2016 Market Power and Joint Ownership: Evidence from Nuclear Plants in Sweden Erik Lundin Research Institute of Industrial Economics P.O. Box 55665 SE-102 15 Stockholm, Sweden [email protected] www.ifn.se Market Power and Joint Ownership: Evidence from Nuclear Plants in Sweden Erik Lundin∗ November 4, 2019. Abstract This paper presents an empirical test of the anticompetitive effects of joint own- ership by examining the operation of three nuclear plants in Sweden. Since main- tenance is the main conduit explaining variation in output, I formulate a model of optimal maintenance allocation given three behavioral assumptions: i) maximal col- lusion, where all owners’ profits on both nuclear and other output are maximized; ii) Cournot competition, where the majority owners’ profits on both nuclear and other output are maximized; and iii) a divested solution, where all owners’ profits on nuclear output are maximized, but no weight is given to non-nuclear output. The behavior that fits the data best is a “hybrid” model where maximal collusion is only achieved during periods of the year when regulatory oversight is less strict. During the remainder of the year, data is instead most consistent with the divested solution. JEL-Classification: L13, L22, L94, D22, D43, D44 Keywords: Joint ownership, electricity wholesale market, nuclear, maintenance, collu- sion, regulatory threat. ∗Research Institute of Industrial Economics, Box 55665, SE-102 15 Stockholm, Sweden. Email: [email protected]. I would like to thank Mar Reguant, Thomas
    [Show full text]