Telecommunications & Electronic Media – Net Neutrality Vs. Net Reality

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Telecommunications & Electronic Media – Net Neutrality Vs. Net Reality Telecommunications & Electronic Media Net Neutrality vs. Net Reality: Why an Evidence-Based Approach to Enforcement, And Not More Regulation, Could Protect Innovation on the Web By Hon. Maureen K. Ohlhausen* Related Links: • Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, Hearing on “Network Neutrality” (testimony of Vinton G. Cerf ), 109th Cong., 1st sess., 2006: http://commerce.senate.gov/pdf/cerf-020706.pdf •Angele A. Gilroy, Congressional Research Service, R40616, Access to Broadband Networks: The Net Neutrality Debate (2013): http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R40616.pdf eople have discussed the purpose, structure, and gov- I. Framing The Net Neutrality Debate ernance of the Internet since its earliest days. More recently, this discussion has sharpened into a debate about A. Design Characteristics Shaping The Debate Pwhether and how to enforce network neutrality—i.e., access Like many of our modern technologies, the Internet be- to the Internet on equal terms for all content providers and gan as a Department of Defense research project.2 Three core consumers. Some content providers want the government to design principles from those days are still relevant for today’s adopt regulations to guarantee them fair access to the Internet. policy decisions: first, the Internet is intentionally decentralized Some network owners, like Verizon or Comcast, disagree and and redundant; second, communications over the Internet are think such regulations are unnecessary and could stifle inno- packet-switched, meaning each message is broken apart and vation on the Internet. This debate is taking place at a time its many pieces travel separately across the web before being of radical change in how we access and use the Internet. The re-assembled at the message’s final destination; and, third, the convergence of telecommunications technologies means that Internet uses “end-to-end architecture” that carries content from today we listen to the radio, watch television, and talk with servers at the “edge” of the Internet on a “first-in, first-out” or friends and family on the Internet. This new reality stands in “best efforts” basis.3 stark contrast to the archaic regulatory framework under the B. Proponents of Net Neutrality Regulation Communications Act of 1934, as amended,1 which treats each form of communication separately. Network neutrality advocates see the success of content With the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC) and applications providers like Google, Yelp, or Facebook regulatory approach to network neutrality again being chal- arising from the core design principles, especially end-to-end lenged by network owners in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the architecture. As Professors Mark Lemley and Lawrence Lessig D.C. Circuit, I think now is the right time for us to seriously have explained: “While the e2e [end-to-end] design principle consider alternatives. From my perspective, we do not need was first adopted for technical reasons, it has important social another layer of regulations issued under the Communications and competitive features as well. e2e expands the competitive Act. Doing this in the face of a dynamic and robust online horizon by enabling a wider variety of applications to connect to 4 environment would contradict my understanding of good and to use the network.” They think “[the] strong presumption government and could impede development of the Internet. [should be] in favor of preserving the architectural features that 5 We should instead focus on informed, flexible, and fact-based have produced this extraordinary innovation.” Net neutrality enforcement of our existing competition and consumer protec- proponents want rules that protect these core design attributes tion norms by expert government agencies, supplemented with by proscribing certain types of behavior by network owners. private self-regulation of technical standards through consensus- Many successful “edge” providers are concerned that based multi-stakeholder organizations of engineers, consumers, owners of the underlying infrastructure could engage in an- and businesspeople. To the extent the government is involved, ticompetitive hold-up, either by cutting off access to users or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) model of enforcement, to other networks, by charging high prices for transport or by advocacy, and industry education is the better model that will providing better services to one content provider instead of its 6 allow free markets the breathing room they need to prosper. competitor either for a fee or because of a financial affiliation. As explained at an FTC-sponsored conference several years ago, ..................................................................... content providers worry about “(1) blockage, degradation, and *Maureen K. Ohlhausen has served on the Federal Trade Commission prioritization of content or applications; (2) vertical integration since 2012. She would like to thank Alexander Okuliar for his assistance by ISPs [internet service providers] and other network provid- in preparing this article. The views expressed in this article are solely those ers into content and applications; . and [3] the diminution of the author and are not meant to reflect the views of the Commission or of political and other free expression on the Internet.”7 This any other Commissioner. February 2013 81 philosophy of rule-based prohibitions to address mainly verti- only to Title I.18 The FCC then extended similar treatment cal concerns is the main force propelling the FCC’s efforts on to broadband access over telephone-based digital subscriber or net neutrality.8 “DSL” lines.19 These reclassifications permitted the FCC to deregulate C. Opponents of Net Neutrality Regulation Internet access while asserting ancillary jurisdiction over broad- Opponents of net neutrality rules are concerned that regu- band providers under provisions like section 4(i) of the Act, lation, by its nature, is inflexible and would penalize innovation 47 U.S.C. § 154(i). In 2005, the FCC acted on this putative in an attempt to maintain the original design principles of the authority and issued an Internet Policy Statement outlining 9 Internet. They argue that among the core engines of growth certain Internet freedoms “to ensure that broadband networks on the Internet has been the latitude to experiment with new are widely deployed, open, affordable, and accessible to all 10 and different business models. They point out that many consumers.”20 In 2008, the FCC alleged Comcast violated this once-successful Internet businesses were vertically-integrated policy by slowing customers’ use of peer-to-peer networking and arguably would violate modern network neutrality regula- applications and then ordered it to cease and desist.21 Comcast tions were they still in business today. Adopting rigid network complied with the order, but challenged the FCC’s exercise of neutrality rules would freeze the existing business environment authority over network management practices.22 The D.C. into place and potentially prevent experimentation with differ- Circuit sided with Comcast, concluding the FCC’s actions ent technologies and types of vertically-integrated businesses or were “flatly inconsistent” with the law, in large part because the business practices. It also could derogate many of the efficiencies agency had tied its ancillary jurisdiction over Comcast’s actions of vertical integration (like eliminating double marginalization mainly to policy statements in the Act rather than to sections problems) and skew investment incentives. Instead of allowing with express statutory delegations of authority.23 the free market to guide investment dollars where needed and With its authority over broadband providers called into businesses to charge based on the best use of potentially dear re- question, Chairman Genachowski proposed a “Third Way” to sources, like bandwidth, the government would dictate many of shore up the FCC’s position. This would require the agency to these decisions. Network operators and ISPs advocate for more reclassify the transmission component of “broadband services” fact-intensive and flexible enforcement of widely-acknowledged as “telecommunications services,” which in theory would allow legal and economic norms. They question whether a systemic it to exercise direct jurisdiction over network management 11 problem requiring expansive solutions even exists. under Title II.24 The Third Way proposal was met with wide- II. Competing Regulatory Solutions spread concern from Congress, which led the FCC to point to yet other bases for its network neutrality jurisdiction—Section A. The FCC Approach To Net Neutrality 706 of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and ancillary ju- risdiction related to additional specific sections of Titles II, III, The FCC historically has taken a segmented approach to and VI.25 The agency then adopted an Open Internet Order in regulating different communications media, as contemplated December 2010 with new network neutrality rules. Generally, by the Communications Act.12 Title I of the Act gives the FCC those rules provide: (1) ISPs must be transparent and disclose general jurisdiction over certain communications, but offers their network management practices; (2) both wireless and fixed little specific jurisdictional guidance for the FCC.13 The other network owners may not block lawful applications or services, titles of the Act spell out more clearly the agency’s authority except for purposes of reasonable network management;
Recommended publications
  • 2018-Channel-Guide.Pdf
    CHANNEL GUIDE Additional Packages Multi-Sport Pack ™ DISH Movie Pack Requires subscription to America’s Top 120 Plus or higher package. 15 movie channels and 1000s of titles available On Demand. beIN SPORTS SAP 392 Crime & Investigation 249 EPIX 1 380 Packages beIN SPORTS en Español 873 Big Ten Network 405 EPIX 2 381 Big Ten Network 410 EPIX Hits 382 Bases Loaded/Buzzer Beater/Goal Line 403 FXM 384 CHANNEL GUIDE FOX Sports 2 149 Hallmark Movies & Mysteries 187 Longhorn Network1 407 HDNet Movies 130 MLB Network 152 IndiePlex 378 MLB Strike Zone 153 MGM 385 designed NBA TV SAP 156 MoviePlex 377 NFL Network 154 PixL SAP 388 NFL RedZone 155 RetroPlex 379 NHL Network 157 Sony Movie Channel 386 Outside TV 390 STARZ Encore Suspense 344 Pac-12 Network 406 STARZ Kids & Family SAP 356 Packages Pac-12 Network 409 Universal HD 247 with you SEC Network 404 SEC Network SAP 408 1 Only HD for live events. Plus over 25 Regional Sports Networks TheBlaze 212 designedin mind. HBO (E) SAP 300 Fox Soccer Plus 391 HBO2 (E) SAP 301 HBO Signature SAP 302 HBO (W) SAP 303 with you HBO2 (W) SAP 304 HBO Family SAP 305 HBO Comedy SAP 307 HBO Zone SAP 308 24/7 HBO Latino 309 Customer in mind. Support Cinemax (E) SAP 310 Cinemax (W) SAP 311 MoreMax SAP 312 ActionMax SAP 313 5StarMax SAP 314 Cinemáx 315 99% Signal SAP Showtime (E) 318 * Showtime (W) SAP 319 Reliability Showtime Too SAP 320 Showtime Showcase SAP 321 Showtime Extreme SAP 322 Showtime Beyond SAP 323 The Movie Channel (E) SAP 327 The Movie Channel Xtra (E) SAP 328 FLIX 333 STARZ Encore (E) SAP 340 STARZ
    [Show full text]
  • Net Neutrality Is Crucial for Democracy. Please Don't Let the Broadband Monopolies Extort Every Website Owner in the World
    Net neutrality is crucial for democracy. Please don't let the broadband monopolies extort every website owner in the world. They're already screwing over their customers with their exorbitant prices and unreliably service *cough*monopoly*cough*. We use the internet to communicate. We need the internet to communicate it large groups. Comcast and friends are common carriers. This is really important. -Jason Woofenden, Northampton, MA I'm a single-mother with a home-based business. Net Neutrality is important to my ability to earn money for my family, to access a wide range of information and viewpoints, and to continue on the path as a lifelong learner. -Rachel Cullar, Oakley, CA I am sick and tired off the greed off the cable companies and the whores in Washington, DC they will get on thier knees for any reason as long as they get the money. Wheeler is just the latest The United States would be well served turning Washington, DC back into a swamp. Please include all of the politicians and lobby folks. Thanks -Edward Tharp, Capistrano Beach, CA Net Neutrality is important to me because it is a free and equal system. It is also a system that is not broken, nor in need of an overhaul or major changes. As a taxpayer, citizen and voter, I want the groups that represent me (FCC, Congress, etc) to hear my voice because our government exists not only to govern but to hear the voice of the common man. -Eric Petersen, Millville, CA Simply put, there is no reason to end Net Neutrality.
    [Show full text]
  • Design, Construction and Testing of a Low Energy Digital Frequency Modulation (FM) Transmitter
    International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research Volume 11, Issue 1, January-2020 534 ISSN 2229-5518 Design, Construction and Testing of a Low Energy Digital Frequency Modulation (FM) Transmitter JP. C. Mbagwu, F.M.Ezike, J.O.Ozuomba Abstract---- A rapidly growing demand for the use of Frequency Modulation (FM) transmitter exists within institutions and individuals. The FM transmitters are however a complex equipment demanding high power supply, high voltage system design, critical maintenance and exorbitant price. These problems of the transmitter constitute major impediments to institutions and individuals that may wish to adopt radio broadcast as means of electronic media. This study was therefore carried out to design and construct an FM transmitter that is of low cost, and simple in maintenance, efficient in use and yet operating on low power supply. The FM transmitter is designed to be received at a range of about 100metres in free air. The transmitter has a capacitor microphone which picks up very weak sound signals, a transistor, resistors, inductor, and capacitors. The design procedure involves the modification of an output of the transmitter. Based on the procedures adopted and the tests carried out, the specific findings include a range of 102.2MHz of transmission from a 9V DC battery. The work indicated that the practical frequency modulated (FM) transmitter requiring a low power can be designed and constructed. Index Terms----Frequency Modulation, FM Transmitter, Radio Broadcast, Antenna. 1.0 INTRODUCTION combined in one unit are called a transceiver. The In electronics and telecommunication, a transmitter term transmitter is often abbreviated ‘‘XMTR’’ or or radio transmitter is an electronic device which ‘‘TX’’ in technical documents.
    [Show full text]
  • Antitrust Over Net Neutrality: Why We Should Take Competition in Broadband Seriously
    ANTITRUST OVER NET NEUTRALITY: WHY WE SHOULD TAKE COMPETITION IN BROADBAND SERIOUSLY HON. MAUREEN K. OHLHAUSEN* In 2015, the FCC subjected broadband Internet service provid- ers to Title II regulation. It did so to enforce net neutrality rules, which require ISPs (internet service providers) to treat all content on their networks equally. The principal justification is to prevent ISPs, in delivering content to their subscribers, from favoring their own content or that of other creators who pay for “fast lanes.” Should such discrimination flourish—the concern goes—ISPs could relegate disfavored content providers to second-tier modes of access to consumers, degrading competition. The rationalization for net neutrality regulation, however, is hard to square with the facts. There is, after all, virtually no evi- dence of ISPs excluding rival content. Two reasons likely explain the paucity of anticompetitive conduct. First, market forces driven by consumer demand would punish broadband service providers that throttled or excluded desired content. And, second, antitrust would forbid efforts by ISPs with significant market power to fore- close rival content. Yet, the FCC’s decision to enact broad net neu- trality rules, which the D.C. Circuit subsequently upheld in 2016, repudiated the view that antitrust is a viable solution to the threat of net neutrality violations. This Article argues, however, that net neutrality proponents too easily dismiss antitrust. Competition law can indeed protect non-economic goals like free speech and democratic participation, but only to the extent that consumers actually value those goals above others. Of course, antitrust does not promote civic discourse as an end in itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Internet Freedom in China: U.S. Government Activity, Private Sector Initiatives, and Issues of Congressional Interest
    Internet Freedom in China: U.S. Government Activity, Private Sector Initiatives, and Issues of Congressional Interest Patricia Moloney Figliola Specialist in Internet and Telecommunications Policy May 18, 2018 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R45200 Internet Freedom in China: U.S. Government and Private Sector Activity Summary By the end of 2017, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) had the world’s largest number of internet users, estimated at over 750 million people. At the same time, the country has one of the most sophisticated and aggressive internet censorship and control regimes in the world. PRC officials have argued that internet controls are necessary for social stability, and intended to protect and strengthen Chinese culture. However, in its 2017 Annual Report, Reporters Without Borders (Reporters Sans Frontières, RSF) called China the “world’s biggest prison for journalists” and warned that the country “continues to improve its arsenal of measures for persecuting journalists and bloggers.” China ranks 176th out of 180 countries in RSF’s 2017 World Press Freedom Index, surpassed only by Turkmenistan, Eritrea, and North Korea in the lack of press freedom. At the end of 2017, RSF asserted that China was holding 52 journalists and bloggers in prison. The PRC government employs a variety of methods to control online content and expression, including website blocking and keyword filtering; regulating and monitoring internet service providers; censoring social media; and arresting “cyber dissidents” and bloggers who broach sensitive social or political issues. The government also monitors the popular mobile app WeChat. WeChat began as a secure messaging app, similar to WhatsApp, but it is now used for much more than just messaging and calling, such as mobile payments, and all the data shared through the app is also shared with the Chinese government.
    [Show full text]
  • Electrical Engineering (ELEC ENG) 1
    Electrical Engineering (ELEC_ENG) 1 Prerequisite: ELEC_ENG 302-0 or equivalent. ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING ELEC_ENG 334-0 Fundamentals of Blockchains and Decentralization (1 Unit) (ELEC_ENG) This course is partly an introduction to the fundamentals of blockchains and decentralized applications and partly a springboard toward ELEC_ENG 302-0 Probabilistic Systems (1 Unit) deeper understanding and further exploration. The course explains Introduction to probability theory and its applications. Axioms of how blockchains work; teaches the underlying fundamentals of probability, distributions, discrete and continuous random variables, distributed consensus; provides hands-on experience through computer conditional and joint distributions, correlation, limit laws, connection assignments; and also touches upon economic and policy issues. to statistics, and applications in engineering systems. May not receive Prerequisites: COMP_SCI 212-0 or ELEC_ENG 302-0 or equivalent or credit for both ELEC_ENG 302-0 and any of the following: IEMS 202-0; graduate standing and basic programming skills. MATH 310-1; STAT 320-1; ELEC_ENG 383-0, ELEC_ENG 385-0. Corequisite: MATH 228-2 or equivalent. ELEC_ENG 353-0 Digital Microelectronics (1 Unit) Logic families, comparators, A/D and D/A converters, combinational ELEC_ENG 307-0 Communications Systems (1 Unit) systems, sequential systems, solid-state memory, largescale integrated Analysis of analog and digital communications systems, including circuits, and design of electronic systems. modulation, transmission, and demodulation of AM, FM, and TV systems. Prerequisites: COMP_ENG 203-0, ELEC_ENG 225-0. Design issues, channel distortion and loss, bandwidth limitations, additive noise. ELEC_ENG 359-0 Digital Signal Processing (1 Unit) Prerequisites: ELEC_ENG 222-0, ELEC_ENG 302-0 or equivalent. Discrete-time signals and systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Money for Nothing the Billion-Dollar Pirate Subscription IPTV Business
    Money for Nothing The Billion-Dollar Pirate Subscription IPTV Business August 2020 Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 The Troubling History of Television Piracy 4 The Pirate Subscription IPTV Ecosystem 6 The Profitability of Pirate Subscription IPTV Services 12 Splitting the Billion-Dollar Pie 14 Conclusion 23 Appendix: The Players Behind the PS IPTV Ecosystem 25 Table of Figures Figure 1 – Sample PS IPTV storefront, landing page 7 Figure 2 – Sample PS IPTV storefront, sales pitch 7 Figure 3 – Sample PS IPTV service, live TV 8 Figure 4 – Sample PS IPTV service, movies 8 Figure 5 – Sample PS IPTV Facebook advertisement 9 Figure 6 – PS IPTV Ecosystem 11 Figure 7 – Content theft 25 Figure 8 – Content distribution, subscription IPTV 26 Money for Nothing: The Billion-Dollar Pirate Subscription IPTV Business i Executive Summary onsumers have more high-quality entertainment to watch on their television sets, computers, tablets, and phones than ever before. But while consumers can select from an ever-growing Cvariety of legal services, illegal streaming services have emerged in their shadow, leveraging stolen content and off-the-shelf streaming technologies to deliver entertainment at a fraction of the cost of legitimate content providers. The most virulent and fast-growing illegal streaming enterprise is the pirate subscription Internet Protocol Television (PS IPTV) Service. This type of service mimics the practices of legitimate streaming services. It charges by the month or by the year – typically, about $10 - $15 per month. And for that low price, it provides the customer with thousands of channels of linear television from around the world, and often with tens of thousands of titles for video on demand, including movies still showing in theaters and every episode of entire TV series.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of the Mass Media in the Behavior Students: a Literature Study
    International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 2017, Vol. 7, No. 8 ISSN: 2222-6990 The Influence of the Mass Media in the Behavior Students: A Literature Study Noradilah Abdul Wahab1, Mohd Shahril Othman2, Najmi Muhammad3 1 Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA), Kampus Gong Badak. Kuala Terengganu 2 Lecturer, Faculty of Islamic Contemporary Studies, Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA) 3 Universiti Malaysia Perlis (UniMAP), Arau, Perlis. DOI: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i8/3218 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i8/3218 Abstract The highly developed and complex of technology has grown up along the current style of the world which had introduces the human to a wide range of communication tools, as well as communications today. Mass media is a means of conveying information simultaneously and accessible to the community all over the world. In present era of globalization, the modernization make it easier for people to carry out their daily lives. However, this sophistication has both positive and negative to the user. The mistake in using this facility will become a threat that can contribute the social problems in society. The objective of this writing is to see the influence of mass media in the formation of student personality. The method of writing is qualitative based on previous studies and research through documents, journals and books related to the discussion of the influence of mass media. The method of literature is the primary basis in this writing that inductively and deductively analyzes by studying literature from both local and western researchers until a strong conclusion in identifying mass media influences on student behavior can be achieved.
    [Show full text]
  • Africa Kagiso Digital Primedia Broadcasting APAC Asia
    Africa Kagiso Digital Primedia Broadcasting APAC Asia MediaCorp Oceania AXR PTE LTD Grant Broadcasters Light FM Nine Radio Nova Entertainment Pty Ltd Southern Cross Austereo Totally Media Pty Ltd South Asia Gaana Hungama Digital Entertainment Media Corp Canada Bell Media Canadian Broadcasting Corporation Quebecor Stingray Digital Europe Karnaval Radio Kerry AdTonos Number One Media Group Radioline Capital Radio NRG Media Talpa Radio Deezer Prisa Radio Williams Broadcasting Grupo Renascenca PRS Digital Srl Zemeho iVoox Global Podcasting Service RADIOCORP LATAM Grupo RPP Radio Alvorada Acir SAT S.A de CV GTB Radiodifusores SRL RADIOS IMC Audio Video SA de CV Jovem Pan Radiopolis Blink 102 FM Imagen Radios Grupo Globo Cadena Radial Costarricense MIX 102.1FM RIO Radio Zocalo S.A de CV CRP Radios MK Publicita Propaganda e PublicidadeRadiodifusora Ltda Queretaro S.A. de C.V. Dial Brazil MobRadio Sistema Vida Colombia S.A. Estereo Azul, S.A. Nova Brasil Televisao Atalaia Ltda Futbol de Primera MVS Radio Mexico TV ACCION Grupo ABC Radio NRM Web SA DE CV Wicca E.U. Grupo BluRadio Prisa Radio Mexico Radio Grupo Grada Producciones Wilvin SA Sistema O POVO de Radios Grupo Radio Centro JB FM Sua Musica Grupo Radiodifusoras Capital Palco MP3 MENA Anghami Go Alive Media TIM Media United States Emmis Radio LLC M&M Media 977Music.com Entercom Mapleton Communications AEIBO LLC Entravision Communications Max Media America Multimedios ESPN Radio Corporate Midwest Adams Radio Group LLC First Media Radio Milner Broadcasting All Pro Broadcasting Inc Flood Communications LLC Mood Media Beasley Mezzanine Fox News Network LLC Neuhoff Communications Bloomberg GateHouse Media Newsweb Radio Bonneville GOW Communications NOBEX Buck Owens One Company Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Best Path Forward on Net Neutrality
    POLICY BRIEF The Best Path Forward on Net Neutrality BY ROBERT LITAN AND HAL SINGER SEPTEMBER 2014 Introduction Net neutrality—the notion that all Internet traffic, regardless of its source or type, must be treated the same by Internet Service Providers (ISPs)—is back on the na- tion’s political radar. The catalyst was the D.C. Court of Appeals’ decision last January in Verizon v. FCC, which overturned the Federal Communications Com- mission’s (FCC) “Open Internet Order.” The essence of the Court’s ruling was that the FCC lacked legal authority to impose the specific non-discrimination re- quirements embodied in that order, which prohibited ISPs and content providers from negotiating rates for speedier delivery or “paid prioritization.” The Court’s rationale was that the FCC had previously declined to designate Internet access “common carriage” under Title II of the Telecommunications Act, a classification that the Court essentially suggested could have justified its order. Importantly, the Court also articulated a less-invasive path for regulating such arrangements, in which ISPs and content providers could voluntarily negotiate the terms for priority delivery. The FCC could serve as a backstop to adjudicate disputes if negotiations broke down and discrimination was to blame. Moreover, the Court signaled that the FCC could invoke this alternative approach under its existing (Section 706) authority without reclassifying ISPs. The Court’s decision has unleashed a vigorous debate over both paid prioritiza- tion and whether Internet access now should be subject to Title II. Broadly speak- ing, public interest and some consumer groups, coupled with some in the tech community (collectively, the “netizens”), want the same (zero) price for all types of online content, regardless of the volume of traffic on each site.
    [Show full text]
  • Rtv 3001 Introduction to Telecommunication Section 4324
    RTV 3001 INTRODUCTION TO TELECOMMUNICATION SECTION 4324 IMPORTANT INFORMATION: Instructor: William A. Renkus, Ph. D. Lecture: Tuesday, Period 10 (5:10 pm – 6:00 pm) & Thursday, Periods 10 - 11 (5:10 pm 7:05 pm)) Room: TUR L007 Office: 3065 Weimer (subject to change) Office Hours: Wednesday & Friday 1:45 PM – 2:45 PM & by appointment E-mail: [email protected] E-Learning: http://lss.at.ufl.edu/ COURSE DESCRIPTION: Electronic media encompass all contemporary paths of mass communication into our lives: radio, television, cable, satellite and the Internet. This course investigates their dynamic influence by unveiling principles that govern media channels of information and entertainment. The goal for students is to understand how our media tools were created, were nurtured into an information industry, and now shape our lives in political, economic, and social ways. We will critically analyze the latest developments from the standpoints of media owners, advertisers, managers, producers, and audiences. COURSE OBJECTIVES: Students will gain knowledge of the telecommunication industry with an emphasis on learning specifically about broadcasting and cable. In addition, changes in new media, business practices, converging markets, and regulatory philosophies will be addressed. This course is designed to offer you an overview of the origins, organizations, and movements that have shaped electronic media. We will learn and discuss the following developments: The historical development of electronic media The technologies involved in the creation of electronic media The structure, economics, and regulation of electronic media The political and legal issues involved in content and management decisions The economics of electronic media, including programming and ratings The lexicon involved within subsets of the telecommunication industry REQUIRED TEXTBOOK: Joseph R.
    [Show full text]
  • BT TV Adopts Telestream Vantage for Enhanced Multiscreen OTT Media
    Vantage Case Study: BT TV Deliver Ingest Monetize Edit BT TV Adopts Telestream Vantage for Enhanced Multiscreen OTT Media Processing Leading UK Telco service provider enhances business agility with Telestream; Introduces robust multiscreen services to better serve millions of consumers “BT TV evaluated all of the The Company available transcoding options BT TV is a subscription IPTV service offered by BT, a division of United and found that Vantage offered Kingdom telecommunications company BT Group, and was originally high quality content in the widest launched as BT Vision in December 2006. As of the end of 2017, BT TV has range of multiscreen formats, with 1.8 million customers. media processing times that are significantly faster than any other BT TV provides on-demand content, 30 entertainment channels (18 of which platform. are available in HD), nine children’s channels, 11 Movie channels (Sky Movies) and five live sports channels (BT Sport & Sky Sports). BT Sport channels are — Peter Harvey, Head of Content available in SD and HD through IPTV signals. BT Sport, ESPN and AMC from Operations (VOD and Digital BT are now available in non-fibre areas over IPTV using copper multicast Media) at BT Technology. where available. As BT TV transmits channels and content through IPTV, BT requires custom- ers to sign up to the BT Broadband internet and phone service to use BT TV, with connection via BT’s official router, BT Home Hub. The Challenge BT TV operates in a fierce commercial environment. One where broadcasters compete daily for viewing audiences – ultimately, they compete for eyeballs.
    [Show full text]