Norton Town Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Norton Town Plan Norton Town Plan Adopted: July 1, 2014 Norton Selectboard Stephan Isabelle David Dominico Kenneth Stransky Norton Planning Commission Tonilyn Fletcher Suzanne Isabelle Hans Klunder Patricia Whitney Stephan Isabelle (ex officio) Table of Contents Section Page Number I. Introduction 1 A. Historic and Geographic Overview 1 B. Purpose of Plan 2 C. Public Participation 2 D. Organization of the Plan 2 E. Overarching Goals 3 II. Land Use 4 A. Existing Conditions 4 B. Planning Considerations 6 C. Goals and Recommended Actions 11 III. Employment and Economic Development 13 A. Existing Conditions 13 B. Planning Considerations 13 C. Goals and Recommended Actions 16 IV. Transportation 17 A. Existing Conditions 17 B. Planning Considerations 18 C. Goals and Recommended Actions 19 V. Community Facilities and Utilities 21 A. Existing Conditions 21 1. Water Supply/Sewage Disposal 21 2. Solid Waste 21 3. Law Enforcement/Emergency Services 21 4. Health Care Facilities 22 5. Public Buildings/Properties 22 6. Public Utilities: Electric and Telecommunications 22 7. Recreation 23 8. Town Administration 23 B. Planning Considerations 24 1. Water Supply/Sewage Disposal 24 2. Solid Waste 24 3. Law Enforcement/Emergency Services 25 4. Health Care Facilities 25 5. Public Buildings/Properties 25 6. Public Utilities: Electric and Telecommunications 26 7. Recreation 26 8. Town Administration 28 C. Goals and Recommended Actions 28 1. Water Supply/Sewage Disposal 28 2. Solid Waste 29 Norton Town Plan Page ii 3. Law Enforcement/Emergency Services 29 4. Health Care Facilities 29 5. Public Buildings/Properties 29 6. Public Utilites: Electric and Telecommunications 29 7. Recreation 30 8. Town Administration 30 VI. Education 31 A. Existing Conditions 31 B. Planning Considerations 31 C. Goals and Recommended Actions 31 VII. Natural, Scenic and Historic Resources 32 A. Existing Conditions 32 B. Planning Considerations 33 C. Goals and Recommended Actions 35 VIII. Energy 36 A. Existing Conditions 36 B. Planning Considerations 36 C. Goals and Recommended Actions 38 IX. Housing 39 A. Existing Conditions 39 B. Planning Considerations 41 C. Goals and Recommended Actions 42 X. Flood Resilience 43 A. Existing Conditions 43 B. Planning Considerations 44 C. Goals and Recommended Actions 46 XI. Regional Compatibility 48 A. Impacts on Adjacent Communities 48 B. Recommended Actions 49 XII. Plan Implementation 50 Appendix 1:Required Elements (chart) 51 Appendix 2: Maps Map 1: Base Map Map 2: Land Use/Land Cover Map 3: Natural Resource Constraints Map 4: Soils Constraints Map 5: Flood Hazard Areas Map 6: Zoning Districts Map 7: Town of Norton General Highway Map Norton Town Plan Page iii I. Introduction A. Historic and Geographic Overview Norton, located on the Canadian Border (Quebec) in northwestern Essex County, has the distinction of being the first town chartered in Vermont in 1769. When chartered, the town name was changed from Hamilton to Norton. The new name came from one of the largest holders of the original land grants, Jedediah Norton. In later years as the lumber business thrived, the town name became Norton Mills. During its peak population years, Norton had a population of over 1000. In the 20th century, the town was renamed Norton following the closure of many of the once numerous mills. As of the 2010 census, the town’s population had fewer than 200 persons. Norton’s historic ties to Quebec are especially important and must be understood to realize the character of this town. The earliest settlers came south from the Gulf of St. Lawrence. Both French and English settlers migrated to Norton and the only major transportation routes were to the north into Quebec. When the railroad arrived in 1853, Norton became tied to America and shipment of lumber from Norton's many mills flowed into southern New England. Many of the settling families still live in Norton and are the backbone of the community. As no roads existed into Island Pond or Canaan until the earliest part of the 20th century most trade and commerce was with Coaticook, in the Province of Quebec just 8 miles to the north. This trend continues for many today as Coaticook, with one major food markets, 2 hardware stores, dentists, restaurants, funeral homes, drug stores and banks provide many of the daily or weekly needs of the community. To the north just 30 minutes is Sherbrooke, a city of 100,000. Sherbrooke is the regional center of the Eastern Townships of Quebec. Sherbrooke/Lenoxville has two universities and the nearest locations for major shopping such as Home Depot, Wal*Mart, Costco, Sears, Hudson Bay Co., movie theaters and restaurants. Many of these services become more or less important as the currency exchange fluctuates bringing more shoppers from the north to Norton or from Norton traveling to the north. Norton is bordered on the East by Averill and Canaan, on the North by Quebec, on the West by Holland, and on the South by Warner’s Grant, Warren Gore, and Avery’s Gore. It is located approximately 15 miles north of Island Pond, and eight miles south of Coaticook, PQ. There are no incorporated villages within the Town of Norton. Norton is known as the most distant town north of the major New England cities, and the town remains a destination for hundreds of Vermonters. To our northern neighbors, Norton is “La Frontiere.” The residents and landowners of Norton are fiercely proud of the traditional, rustic character of the town. There is a desire for Norton to grow and Norton Town Plan Page 1 prosper while retaining our character and remote identity. This Town Plan respects our rich heritage and presents a blueprint for our third century. B. Purpose of Town Plan The Norton Planning Commission is responsible for the development of this Plan. The town’s previous Plan expired in 2011. Recent changes to the Vermont Municipal and Regional Planning and Development Act, along with a desire to control its own future aided Norton’s decision to create this new Town Plan. The Plan forms the basis for updating Norton’s land use regulations, and provides a valuable reference in the review of projects by local municipal boards, projects subject to Act 250 Review, and projects requiring review by the Vermont Public Service Board for the issuance of a “certificate of public good” (Section 248 proceedings). It also serves as a guiding document when making decisions on capital improvements within the Town. The development of this Plan was funded by a Municipal Planning Grant from Vermont’s Department of Housing and Community Affairs. This Plan in its entirety spells out the general direction in which the Town of Norton wishes to proceed. C. Public Participation As part of the planning process for the 2006 Plan, the Norton Planning Commission conducted an extensive opinion survey of residents and landowners. The response was very good, with 110 individuals participating – nearly one-half of Norton’s population. Of the survey respondents, 35% were resident homeowners and 50% were seasonal homeowners. Sixty percent of respondents were between the ages 41-64, and 36% were age 65 or older. Survey results have been incorporated into this document and are in a bulleted format. The Planning Commission believes that local opinions have changed little over recent years; therefore most recommendations are still valid for this 2013 update. The complete 14-page questionnaire and all responses are available for public review at the Town offices. D. Organization of the Plan The Plan is arranged in sections that comprise the elements required for municipal plans under the Vermont Planning and Development Act (24 V.S.A. § 4382). The Plan includes sections on: Land Use Economic Development Transportation Public Facilities and Utilities Education Natural, Scenic and Historic Resources Energy Norton Town Plan Page 2 Housing Flood Resilience Plan Implementation and Compatibility with Region The section on Flood Resilience is a new requirement for Town Plans effective July 1, 2014, based on a recently enacted amendment to 24 V.S.A. § 4382. This section addresses flood hazard areas in Norton, and recommends strategies to mitigate risks to public safety, critical infrastructure, and municipal investments. For each element of the Plan, “Existing Conditions” and “Planning Considerations,” including noted deficiencies or needs for the future of the community, are described. Relevant input from the 2006 community survey is included in each section of the Plan in the “Planning Considerations” subsection. At the end of each Plan section are “Goals and Recommended Actions” outlining how the Town wishes to proceed. E. Overarching Goals The Planning Commission has identified six major overarching priorities (goals) for the Town of Norton. They are equally important and appear throughout this document. Goals pertaining to specific elements of the Plan are included under the “Goals and Recommended Actions” of each individual section: Traditional ways of life and land use patterns within the Town of Norton should be preserved. The number of town-maintained roads (class 3 and 4) should be kept to a minimum, and environmental quality should be given priority when new roads are constructed. Minimizing environmental degradation caused by development activities is a priority. Maintaining and protecting water quality in our lakes, ponds, rivers, wetlands, and streams is a priority. Maintaining and enhancing recreational opportunities for the residents and visitors of the Town of Norton is a priority. Land use should be based on the natural resource constraints of a particular parcel of land, and take into consideration special attributes such as wetlands, special flood hazard area, steep slopes, mountain tops, or special wildlife habitat. Norton Town Plan Page 3 II. Land Use A. Existing Conditions Norton has total land area of 24,832 acres, or approximately 39 square miles; 85% of which is owned by large timber interests and the State of Vermont.
Recommended publications
  • Norton Town Plan
    Norton Town Plan Adopted: July 11, 2019 Norton Selectboard Daniel Keenan Christopher Fletcher Franklin Henry Norton Planning Commission Tonilyn Fletcher Suzanne Isabelle Gina Vigneault Patricia Whitney Daniel Keenan (ex officio) Table of Contents Norton Town Plan ................................................................................................................ i I. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 II. Land Use ........................................................................................................................ 4 III. Employment/Economic Opportunity .......................................................................... 12 IV. Transportation ............................................................................................................. 15 V. Community Facilities & Utilities ................................................................................. 18 VI. Education .................................................................................................................... 27 VII. Natural, Scenic and Historic Resources .................................................................... 27 VIII. Energy ...................................................................................................................... 32 IX. Housing ....................................................................................................................... 34 X. Flood Resilience ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • GOLD PLACER DEPOSITS of the EASTERN TOWNSHIPS, PART E PROVINCE of QUEBEC, CANADA Department of Mines and Fisheries Honourable ONESIME GAGNON, Minister L.-A
    RASM 1935-E(A) GOLD PLACER DEPOSITS OF THE EASTERN TOWNSHIPS, PART E PROVINCE OF QUEBEC, CANADA Department of Mines and Fisheries Honourable ONESIME GAGNON, Minister L.-A. RICHARD. Deputy-Minister BUREAU OF MINES A.-0. DUFRESNE, Director ANNUAL REPORT of the QUEBEC BUREAU OF MINES for the year 1935 JOHN A. DRESSER, Directing Geologist PART E Gold Placer Deposits of the Eastern Townships by H. W. McGerrigle QUEBEC REDEMPTI PARADIS PRINTER TO HIS MAJESTY THE KING 1936 PROVINCE OF QUEBEC, CANADA Department of Mines and Fisheries Honourable ONESIME GAGNON. Minister L.-A. RICHARD. Deputy-Minister BUREAU OF MINES A.-O. DUFRESNE. Director ANNUAL REPORT of the QUEBEC BUREAU OF MINES for the year 1935 JOHN A. DRESSER, Directing Geologist PART E Gold Placer Deposits of the Eastern Townships by H. W. MeGerrigle QUEBEe RÉDEMPTI PARADIS • PRINTER TO HIS MAJESTY THE KING 1936 GOLD PLACER DEPOSITS OF THE EASTERN TOWNSHIPS by H. W. McGerrigle TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE INTRODUCTION 5 Scope of report and method of work 5 Acknowledgments 6 Summary 6 Previous work . 7 Bibliography 9 DESCRIPTION OF PLACER LOCALITIES 11 Ascot township 11 Felton brook 12 Grass Island brook . 13 Auckland township. 18 Bury township .. 19 Ditton area . 20 General 20 Summary of topography and geology . 20 Table of formations 21 IIistory of development and production 21 Dudswell township . 23 Hatley township . 23 Horton township. 24 Ireland township. 25 Lamhton township . 26 Leeds township . 29 Magog township . 29 Orford township . 29 Shipton township 31 Moe and adjacent rivers 33 Moe river . 33 Victoria river 36 Stoke Mountain area .
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment Northern Border Remote Radio Link Pilot Project Essex and Orleans Counties, Vermont
    DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NORTHERN BORDER REMOTE RADIO LINK PILOT PROJECT ESSEX AND ORLEANS COUNTIES, VERMONT February 2019 Lead Agency: U.S. Customs and Border Protection 24000 Avila Road, Suite 5020 Laguna Niguel, California 92677 Prepared by: Gulf South Research Corporation 8081 Innovation Park Drive Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70820 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background and Purpose and Need The area near the U.S./Canada International border in Vermont is extremely remote and contains dense forest and steep terrain intersected by numerous streams, lakes, and bogs. These conditions make it very difficult for U.S. Border Patrol (USBP) agents to patrol the area and communicate with each other and station personnel while on patrol. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Science and Technology Directorate (S&T), has developed a prototypical Remote Radio Link Project that includes the installation of a buried communications cable to enhance the communications capability and safety of Border Patrol agents who are conducting enforcement activities in these areas. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) is assisting S&T in developing this Environmental Assessment (EA) to address the proposed installation and operation of the pilot project. The purpose of this pilot project is to determine the effectiveness of this type of remote radio link system in four-season weather. The need for the project is to identify such reliable communication methods that can enhance USBP enforcement activities and agent safety. Proposed Action The Proposed Action includes the installation, operation, and maintenance of a Remote Radio Link Pilot Project along the U.S./Canada International border west of Norton, Vermont.
    [Show full text]
  • Inside the Kingdom
    INSIDE THE KINGDOM January 11, 2017 the Chronicle Section B – 16 Pages In Albany Combining mugs, words, and wishes by Elizabeth Trail ALBANY — Small hands worked busily and young faces frowned in concentration as children at the Albany Community School struggled to join seams and attach handles to the mugs they were making. In what’s becoming an annual highlight of the school year, North Wolcott potter Heather Stearns is teaching a clay workshop at the school for several days over a three-week period in January. Every child in the school is part of the project, and if this year is anything like the previous three, when it’s all done, there will be a party. This year, it’s all about combining mugs and words and wishes. “I like themes,” said eighth-grader Caroline Lowry. “It helps you make a decision about what you want to do.” This is Ms. Stearns’ fourth year doing workshops at the school. They are sponsored through a grant from the Vermont Arts Council. The first two years, the children made bowls, and followed up with a community meal, with parents invited to share homecooked meals and local food. Austin Smith (left) and Kaleb Colaceci put the finishing touches on their mugs. Photos by Elizabeth Trail The next year, they made plates. This year’s project is mugs. “We started by brainstorming wishes,” she There were a few wishes for money, and a “Mugs are special,” Ms. Stearns said. “We said. couple of boys wished for hunting success. have favorites. We feel a certain way when we Working as a group, each class listed their Austin Smith wished for a million dollars on use a certain mug.” wishes for themselves, their families, their a mug decorated with rabbit tracks.
    [Show full text]
  • Inside the Kingdom
    INSIDE THE KINGDOM April 6, 2016 the Chronicle Section B – 20 Pages At Dabble Day Event connects the dots for childcare resources by Elizabeth Trail COVENTRY — Indoors and out, the Coventry Village School was a beehive of activity on Saturday morning. About 300 parents, children, and volunteers showed up for Dabble Day — an annual spring event that combines activities for children with a chance for families to connect with child care providers and community resources. Outdoors, a dozen or more hardy children clambered around on the swings and playground equipment, supervised by adults willing to ignore the on-again, off-again sunshine and chilly breeze. Indoors, youngsters had a chance to watch a filmed puppet show, build towers with giant blocks, watch someone play the guitar, get their hands gooey in a trough of a cornstarch emulsion, and experiment with art projects. While the children were entertained, their parents walked around the school’s multi- purpose room collecting brochures and talking to representatives from local organizations. Dabble Day is put on with funding from Community National Bank and additional grant money, Theresa Forbes said. Ms. Forbes was at Dabble Day as a volunteer with the Northeast Four-year-old Amelia Drown watches raptly while Steve McManus plays the guitar. Mr. McManus is an employee Kingdom Providers’ Association (NEKPA), which of Northeast Kingdom Human Services. Amelia’s parents are Josh and Alice Drown of Orleans. represents day care providers and preschools. Photos by Elizabeth Trail The event was a little different this year in several respects, she said. coordinator for Building Bright Futures, one of may need education or training to find higher- First, there was more emphasis on services the organizations collaborating to put on Dabble paying work.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2019 Breeding Status of Common Loons in Vermont
    THE 2019 BREEDING STATUS OF COMMON LOONS IN VERMONT Eric W. Hanson1,2 and Doug Morin3 ABSTRACT: The Vermont Loon Conservation Project, a program of the Vermont Center for Ecostudies and the Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department, documented 101 nesting loon pairs and 129 territorial pairs statewide. Of the 101 pairs that attempted nesting, 75 successfully hatched 115 eggs, with 87 chicks surviving through August (chick survival rate 76%, 0.67 chicks surviving per territorial pair). Six new nesting pairs and 4 new potential territorial pair were identified. Twenty-two pairs that have nested in recent years did not nest in 2019. Of 33 pairs whose first nest attempts failed, 10 re-nested, and 8 were successful. Known causes of nest failure included depredation (6 nests), flooding (13 nests), and loon disturbance (2 nests). The remaining failed nests were abandoned for unknown reasons with predators and disruption from intruder loons being the most likely causes. The causes of most chick mortality were unknown. At least 9 chicks disappeared after interactions with intruder loons, 2 were taken by Bald Eagles (Green River Res., Miles P.), and 1 chick was likely hit by a boat (Maidstone L.). During the summer months, 8 adult loon mortalities were documented. Six of these were sent to Tufts University for necropsies with 2 dying from lead fishing gear, 2 from a respiratory fungal disease, and 2 from unknown causes. We monitored several other loons reported in distress, caught in fishing line, or observed in open water holes surrounded by ice. Four loons were observed entangled in fishing line/gear, but were not observed during follow-up surveys.
    [Show full text]
  • TOWNSHIPS ODDITIES and EXTREMES Text and Photography (Except Where Noted): Matthew Farfan
    TOWNSHIPS ODDITIES AND EXTREMES Text and photography (except where noted): Matthew Farfan The following tour features fourteen attractions found in the Eastern Townships, each of which is either odd or unique in some way, or else the smallest, largest, longest, shortest, highest, or oldest of its kind. Sites range from a slave burial ground, to the highest village in Quebec, to the largest open-pit asbestos mine in the Western Hemisphere. 1) Slave Burial Ground: “Nigger Rock” & the Black Community of Saint-Armand Strong oral tradition and increasing hard evidence suggest that there was once a substantial slave community in Saint-Armand. According to tradition, a large outcrop of rock near the village, known for generations by the derogatory term “Nigger Rock,” was a burial ground for slaves two centuries ago. The "Rock" is located on what was once the property of Philip Luke, a Loyalist, who settled in the area after the American Revolution, and who, documents show, arrived with slaves he inherited from his mother. Oral tradition surrounding the site is strong among Saint-Armand's older residents, some of whom recall stories from their parents or from their childhood about the old slave burial ground or about the blacks in the area. “Nigger Rock” is believed to be the only known burial ground in Canada for blacks who were born and died in slavery. In 2003, a plaque was presented to the municipality by the Government of Quebec. It reads (in French): “Oral tradition holds that near here, at a place known as Nigger Rock, many black slaves were buried between 1794 and 1833.
    [Show full text]
  • WATERS THAT DRAIN VERMONT the Connecticut River Drains South
    WATERS THAT DRAIN VERMONT The Connecticut River drains south. Flowing into it are: Deerfield River, Greenfield, Massachusetts o Green River, Greenfield, Massachusetts o Glastenbury River, Somerset Fall River, Greenfield, Massachusetts Whetstone Brook, Brattleboro, Vermont West River, Brattleboro o Rock River, Newfane o Wardsboro Brook, Jamaica o Winhall River, Londonderry o Utley Brook, Londonderry Saxtons River, Westminster Williams River, Rockingham o Middle Branch Williams River, Chester Black River, Springfield Mill Brook, Windsor Ottauquechee River, Hartland o Barnard Brook, Woodstock o Broad Brook, Bridgewater o North Branch Ottauquechee River, Bridgewater White River, White River Junction o First Branch White River, South Royalton o Second Branch White River, North Royalton o Third Branch White River, Bethel o Tweed River, Stockbridge o West Branch White River, Rochester Ompompanoosuc River, Norwich o West Branch Ompompanoosuc River, Thetford Waits River, Bradford o South Branch Waits River, Bradford Wells River, Wells River Stevens River, Barnet Passumpsic River, Barnet o Joes Brook, Barnet o Sleepers River, St. Johnsbury o Moose River, St. Johnsbury o Miller Run, Lyndonville o Sutton River, West Burke Paul Stream, Brunswick Nulhegan River, Bloomfield Leach Creek, Canaan Halls Stream, Beecher Falls 1 Lake Champlain Lake Champlain drains into the Richelieu River in Québec, thence into the Saint Lawrence River, and into the Gulf of Saint Lawrence. Pike River, Venise-en-Quebec, Québec Rock River, Highgate Missisquoi
    [Show full text]
  • Abenaki Indian Grammar
    AB EN AK I IND IAN EGEN D S G R M M R A N D PL CE N M ES L , A A A A Copyright 1 932 . CONTEN TS — l l FOREWOR D A . I . Ha lo wel , — PR EFACE H . L . Masta . WOR KS CON SULTED — w h . oh 9 0 . Iu m zo i A wi k iga n buP P . Wz i lai n , 1 3 r New En glan d Ga z etteer by Jo hn Haywo d , 1 847 . — ' ’ r A n k a b A M ur u 1 . IIi sl o i c d cs bé a i s by l bc J . a a ll , 866 v l z r fB i h o r h m — Lo el s Ga ettee o ri t s N t A e ri ca , 1 873 . k i a i lo —b o Abe n a s n d En gli sh D a gues y J s. Lauren t , A ben ak i Chi ef, 1 882 . PART I ABEN AKI INDIAN LEGEND S AND STORIES, PART II ABENAKI INDIAN GRAMMAR . PART III THE MEANING OF IN DIAN NAMES OF RIVERS . LAKES Etc . ‘ TI' IE A BREVIATLED MANNER OF R EADING AN D W RITING IN ABENAKI . HENR Y LORNE MASTA Alb en aki Ex Past Head Chi ef ° a? (1 44 l fi e /m g m a r a n a f , %c e HENRY LORNE MASTA a Odan k , P . Q . Edi t o r - La V o i x des Ro is Fra nc s .
    [Show full text]
  • Some Observations on the Late-Glacia Stages in the Coaticook Valley, Southern Québec John Thornes
    Document généré le 27 sept. 2021 04:42 Cahiers de géographie du Québec Some Observations on the Late-Glacia Stages in the Coaticook Valley, Southern Québec John Thornes Volume 9, numéro 18, 1965 Résumé de l'article Cette étude a pour but de présenter les résultats de recherches sur le terrain URI : https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/020598ar portant sur certains aspects de la déglaciation de la région de Coaticook, dans DOI : https://doi.org/10.7202/020598ar les Cantons de l'Est. La principale conclusion de l'auteur, c'est la possibilité qu'il y Aller au sommaire du numéro ait eu plus de deux avancées glaciaires à travers la région, suivies par une succession de lacs pro-glaciaires. Parmi les autres sujets qui ont retenu l'attention de l'auteur, on peut signaler la répartition des blocs erratiques de Éditeur(s) granité, ainsi que certaines formes d'origine fluvio-glaciaire (eskers, deltas pro-glaciaires, etc.). Département de géographie de l'Université Laval ISSN 0007-9766 (imprimé) 1708-8968 (numérique) Découvrir la revue Citer cet article Thornes, J. (1965). Some Observations on the Late-Glacia Stages in the Coaticook Valley, Southern Québec. Cahiers de géographie du Québec, 9(18), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.7202/020598ar Tous droits réservés © Cahiers de géographie du Québec, 1965 Ce document est protégé par la loi sur le droit d’auteur. L’utilisation des services d’Érudit (y compris la reproduction) est assujettie à sa politique d’utilisation que vous pouvez consulter en ligne. https://apropos.erudit.org/fr/usagers/politique-dutilisation/ Cet article est diffusé et préservé par Érudit.
    [Show full text]
  • And Field-Based Investigation of Main Channel Morphological Sensitivity to Tributary Inputs at the Watershed Scale in Québec
    A GIS- and field-based investigation of main channel morphological sensitivity to tributary inputs at the watershed scale in Québec Iulia Mazgareanu A Thesis in the Department of Geography, Planning and Environment Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science (Geography, Urban and Environmental Studies) at Concordia University Montreal, Quebec, Canada August 2019 Iulia Mazgareanu CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY School of Graduate Studies This is to certify that the thesis prepared By: Iulia Mazgareanu Entitled: A GIS- and field-based investigation of main channel morphological sensitivity to tributary inputs at the watershed scale in Québec and submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Geography, Urban and Environmental Studies) complies with the regulations of the University and meets the accepted standards with respect to originality and quality. Signed by the final examining committee: ______________________________________ Chair Dr. Pierre Deslauriers ______________________________________ Examiner Dr. Leonard Sklar ______________________________________ External Examiner Dr. Daniel Germain ______________________________________ Thesis Supervisor Dr. Pascale Biron ______________________________________ Thesis Co-supervisor Dr. Thomas Buffin-Bélanger Approved by Chair of Department or Graduate Program Director Dean, Date ABSTRACT A GIS- and field-based investigation of main channel morphological sensitivity to tributary inputs at the watershed scale in
    [Show full text]
  • Vermont Department of Environmental Conservation
    Permit No. 4906-9003.R STATE OF VERMONT AGENCY OF NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE STORMWATER UNDER MULTI-SECTOR GENERAL PERMIT 3-9003 NPDES VTR 050001 A determination has been made that the applicant (here in after “permittee”): Timber Resources Group, Inc. P.O. Box 271 Farmington, ME 04938 meets the criteria necessary for inclusion under General Permit 3- 9003. Subject to the conditions and eligibility provisions of General Permit No. 3-9003, the permittee is authorized to discharge stormwater from Burke Log Yard located on Vermont Route 114 in East Burke, Vermont to the East Branch of the Passumpsic River. 1. Effective Date and Expiration Date of this Authorization: This authorization to discharge shall become effective on January 12, 2012 and shall continue until August 4, 2016. The permittee shall reapply for coverage at least one hundred and eighty (180) days prior to August 4, 2016. 2. Compliance with General Permit 3-9003 and this Authorization: The permittee shall comply with this authorization and all the terms, conditions and eligibility provisions of General Permit 3-9003. General Permit 3-9003 contains a number of detailed requirements which are applicable to your facility and your discharge-related activities. These include, but are not limited to, the inspection, monitoring and reporting requirements listed below. Please read and follow the permit carefully to ensure that you remain in compliance with all permit conditions. 3. Inspection Requirement: The permittee shall conduct monthly facility inspections and an annual comprehensive site inspection in accordance with Part 4 of the General Permit.
    [Show full text]