DOCSLIB.ORG

HAN Annual Report 2015 HAN Annual Report 2015 | Content

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
HAN Annual Report 2015 HAN Annual Report 2015 | Content HAN University of Applied Sciences HAN Annual Report 2015 HAN Annual Report 2015 | Content Content Foreword by the Executive Board 5 Introduction 7 1. The institution’s policies 10 Mission and vision 11 Direction and profile 12 Professional learning communities 12 Bildung 13 Centres of expertise 13 Valorisation 14 Internationalisation 14 2. Education 15 Number of students 16 Results of performance targets: education 17 Quality assurance: education 21 Student facilities 23 Internationalisation and student mobility 26 3. Research 28 Links to centres of expertise/development of minors and Masters 31 Quality assurance in research 31 4. Professional practice and the region 32 Centres of expertise 33 Valorisation and entrepreneurship 35 Working and learning 39 2 HAN Annual Report 2015 | Content Masters courses 41 Alumni policy 42 5. Quality is a human product 43 Culture of quality to drive the realisation of our goals 45 Staff and organisation development 48 Professional development and professional culture 49 Absenteeism 52 Employee satisfaction 53 Unemployment benefits and top-up benefits 53 Pay and Conditions Negotiations/Decentralised Employment Conditions Fund 53 6. Operational excellence 55 Information services/ICT 56 Accommodation 57 Implementation of the energy covenant 58 Facility Services 58 Compliance 59 7. Governance 60 HAN’s organisation 61 Planning and control 62 Sector code for good governance of universities of applied sciences 63 Executive Board 64 Supervisory Board 67 Report of the Supervisory Board 70 Participation Council 72 Horizontal and vertical accountability 72 Risk management 73 Financial instruments 76 Public/Private 77 Assessment against enrolment and funding regulations 78 Clarity Memo 79 3 HAN Annual Report 2015 | Content 8. Financial Report 80 Summary financial statements 81 Financing 85 Treasury 85 Continuity section 86 Balance sheets for 2014-2017 88 Statement of operating income and expenditure for 2014-2017 89 Appendix 1 94 A Course offerings 95 B Intake and enrolments per faculty 99 C List of research groups and professors on 31/12/2015 101 D International mobility, figures and trends 105 E Organisation and key figures 2015 120 Appendix 2 127 Results of performance targets HAN Institutional Plan 2012-2016 Knowledge in Interaction A Overview results of objectives and performance targets 128 B Notes on results of HAN Institutional Plan 2012-2016 and performance targets 130 C. Definitions and sources for indicators of HAN Institutional Plan 2012-2016 164 4 HAN Annual Report 2015 | Foreword by the Executive Board Foreword by the Executive Board 2015 was a busy year for higher education: the minister presented a new Strategic Agenda; there were preparations for experiments with part-time education; a new student loans system was launched; adjust- ments were made to legislation on high incomes in the public sector; the student occupation of the University of Amsterdam’s Maagdenhuis led to much discussion on having a say in higher education; the Dutch National Research Agenda was adopted; and much more. Many at our institution watched these events from a safe distance. We did not see this as a problem: our pride and focus should always be, first and fore- most, on providing excellent education and training for our students, most of whom are young and hail from vocational and higher general secondary schools in the region. This was what 2015 was all about for us. And in this respect, we can report many positive developments. With pleasure and pride, we look back on the results in the year under review, including: 1 The high degree to which we achieved the performance targets. 2 The excellent results in the area of our practice-based research. 3 Our healthy financial position. 4 Our leading position in part-time education. 5 The steady improvement in accreditation scores and student satis- faction. 6 The increase in our people’s levels of ambition and the many great innovations in education and research. All these great results have largely been due to the strong motivation of our colleagues, who rally together for the good cause of education and research, have a strong sense of community, and are encouraged by the direction we have chosen. We are particularly pleased with the way in which the atmosphere at our institution has developed. 5 HAN Annual Report 2015 | Foreword by the Executive Board In this respect, the Large Scale Dream, held in the Gelredome on 12 June 2015, was a special day. Thousands of our colleagues and students spent a whole day reflecting in solidarity on the future of teaching and research, on the future of HAN, on trust and the fact that people make the difference, on inspirational partnership, and on what this all means for what we do. It resulted in a short, powerful and jointly produced new institutional plan for 2016-2020. That day is etched in our collective memory. We are aware that we were able to do our work in 2015 in Arnhem and Nijmegen in peace and prosperity. We did not have to flee, we did not face mass redundancies on New Year’s Eve, we worked in well-equipped buildings and we did not have to teach our classes under a bridge, like some in India. There are also areas where we still need to learn and improve. We want to become even better, both in terms of what we do and how we do it. There is now a broad awareness of where we want to go and what this will demand of us. As a board, we are proud of the results, and pleased with the atmosphere and great efforts being made by many at HAN. In the end, it is after all about just one thing: giving our students an unfor- gettable, high-quality education, enriched and deepened with relevant practice-based research. Concerning this latter aim, we were also very successful in 2015. This is clear from the RAAK grants we received, one of which was won as part of the RAAK award for best practice-based research. We would like to express our thanks and appreciation to all our HAN colleagues, students and external partners who contributed to our many achievements in 2015. The Executive Board, Kees Boele, Diana de Jong and Frank Stöteler 6 HAN Annual Report 2015 | Introduction Introduction 7 HAN Annual Report 2015 | Introduction Introduction This year’s annual report is a special report. In this 2015 Annual Report, we account not only for the developments and results of our objectives in the previous year, but also for the entire 2012-2015 period, for which HAN, like other educational institutions, had agreed on performance targets with the Minister of Education, Culture and Science. This annual report thus serves as an important basis for the minister’s final assess- ment of the results of these performance targets. As such, this annual report is especially important for HAN, and it is slightly more detailed than our usual reports. The structure and contents of this annual report are still based on the ‘old’ HAN Institutional Plan 2012-2016, in line with the annual reports of the last three years. In 2015, HAN adopted a new HAN Institutional Plan 2012-2016. This will form the basis for annual reports from the next reporting year onwards. In Chapter 1 we describe the institution’s policies and take a brief look at the new institutional plan. In chapters 2 to 8 we reflect on the events and developments of 2015, and give an account of the results of our ob- jectives and performance targets. The explanatory tables and key figures from chapters 2-8 can be found in Appendix 1. Appendix 2 contains a brief summary of the results of our objectives and performance targets for the period 2012-2015 (with 2011 serving as the baseline). This appendix provides explanatory notes on each aspect regarding the results of the objective and performance target. The ex- planatory notes are preceded by a concise summary of the target, the situation in 2011, the measures taken, the results and our plans for the future. 8 HAN Annual Report 2015 | Introduction This appendix is particularly relevant for the Review Committee’s as- sessment and recommendations to the minister on whether HAN has adequately met its performance targets. 9 HAN Annual Report 2015 | 1. The institution’s policies The institution’s policies 10 HAN Annual Report 2015 | 1. The institution’s policies HAN University of Applied Sciences (HAN) is one of the largest and most prominent universities of applied sciences in the Netherlands. The successful synergy between our education and research, profes- sional practice and society has yielded high satisfaction ratings, strong growth figures and increased ties within the region. Our most important objective is to maintain and further optimise this synergy on the basis of quality, responsibility and trust, an objec- tive that we will also continue to pursue in our international educa- tion in the coming years. Mission and vision In 2015, our students, lecturers, staff and external stakeholders made a joint effort to draft and write a new institutional plan for the period 2012-2016. This laid the foundations for our updated mission: HAN’s mission is to qualify, socialise and train students for their future pro- fessional careers, for citizenship, and for producing innovations in a dynam- ic, globalising and complex society. We train students to be self-confident individuals who can realise their own potential and push boundaries, and who are able to innovate in professional practice. This requires an interdis- ciplinary perspective that stimulates learning and innovation. By means of professional learning communities that link education and research, student and professional practice, we aim to maximise personal impact and societal innovation. Two of HAN’s distinguishing characteristics play a key role here: • excellence in the quality, intensity and impact of the relationship be- tween education, research and professional practice, so as to pro- duce well-qualified professionals who are not afraid to explore new paths, who are constantly developing, are socially committed and have a strong moral conscience; • excellence in partnerships within HAN, based on the principle of a ‘culture of quality’: a systematic focus on a) the content and quality 11 HAN Annual Report 2015 | 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Human Interaction with Technology for Working, Communicating, and Learning: Advancements
    An Excellent Addition to Your Library! Released: December 2011 Human Interaction with Technology for Working, Communicating, and Learning: Advancements Anabela Mesquita (ISCAP/IPP and Algoritmi Centre, University of Minho, Portugal) The way humans interact with technology is undergoing a tremendous change. It is hard to imagine the lives we live today without the benefits of technology that we take for granted. Applying research in computer science, engineer- ing, and information systems to non-technical descriptions of technology, such as human interaction, has shaped and continues to shape our lives. Human Interaction with Technology for Working, Communicating, and Learning: Advancements provides a framework for conceptual, theoretical, and applied research in regards to the relationship between technology and humans. This book is unique in the sense that it does not only cover technology, but also science, research, and the relationship between these fields and individuals’ experience. This book is a must have for anyone interested in this research area, as it provides a voice for all users and a look into our future. Topics Covered: • Anthropological Consequences • Philosophy of Technology • Experiential Learning • Responsibility of Artificial Agents • Influence of Gender on Technology • Technological Risks and Their Human Basis • Knowledge Management • Technology Assessments • Perceptions and Conceptualizations • Technology Ethics of Technology • Phenomenology of E-Government ISBN: 9781613504659; © 2012; 421 pp. Print: US $175.00 | Perpetual: US $265.00 | Print + Perpetual: US $350.00 Market: This premier publication is essential for all academic and research library reference collections. It is a crucial tool for academicians, researchers, and practitioners and is ideal for classroom use. Anabela Mesquita is a professor at the Institute of Administration and Accountancy (ISCAP)/Polytechnic School of Porto (IPP), Portugal.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Call for Papers
    SECOND CALL FOR PAPERS 3rd FRENCH CONFERENCE ON SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ACCOUNTING RESEARCH (3rd CSEAR France Conference) June 11-12, 2015 ESSEC Business School, France The Centre for Social and Environmental Accounting Research (CSEAR) has held an annual conference in the UK (often referred to as the Summer School) for more than two decades, as well as in other parts of the world for several years in Europe, Australia, New Zealand, and in both North and South Americas. Similar to other CSEAR conferences, the 3rd CSEAR France Conference will be a deliberately informal discussion forum gathering researchers, teachers, students and practitioners at all levels of experience to further enhance research in new instruments, policies and strategies related to social and environmental accounting in the very widest sense. The spirit of the conference is interdisciplinary and focuses on a high level of interaction, discussion and debate in a friendly and supportive atmosphere. As such, research papers from perspectives beyond accounting and management control such as organizational theory, marketing, finance, strategy, etc., are welcome. The conference will provide participants an opportunity to present their research projects, ranging from discussing preliminary findings to full papers. Submissions are welcome in either French or English. For this 3rd CSEAR France conference, we are pleased to welcome Professor Brendan O’Dwyer, Professor of Accounting at the University of Amsterdam, as our plenary speaker. For the practitioner forum, we are equally pleased to welcome Adam Koniuszewski, Chief Operating Officer at Green Cross International. There will also be a Special Issue of Advances in Environmental Accounting and Management on the “Current Developments in Social and Environmental Accounting” (a call for papers has been issued and is available on the conference website).
    [Show full text]
  • IEEE IRI 2013 Main Conference Program
    IEEE IRI 2013 Detailed Program, August 14-16, 2013, Sofitel Hotel, San Francisco, USA IEEE IRI 2013 Main Conference Program August 14, 2013, Wednesday (Day 1) 8:00 am - 5:00 pm Conference Registration (Conference Registration Desk at Ballroom Foyer) Informal Meet & Greet - Breakfast 7:30-8:15am (Veranda) Welcome, Conference Opening Remarks 8:15-8:30am (Bordeaux) KEYNOTE 1: Professor Lotfi A. Zadeh, UC Berkeley, CA, USA 8:30-9:30am Toward a Restriction-Centered Theory of Truth and Meaning (Bordeaux) 9:30–9:50am Break (Ballroom Foyer) 9:50am- Session A1 11:50am Session A11 (Grand Salon) Information Security & Privacy Chair: Du Zhang California State University, Sacramento, USA FIEP: An Initial Design of A Firewall Information Exchange Protocol 20 Sandeep Reddy Pedditi, Du Zhang and Chung-E Wang (Application Paper) California State University, Sacramento, USA Predicting Susceptibility to Social Bots on Twitter (1) (1) (1) (2) 33 Randall Wald , Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar , Amri Napolitano and Chris Sumner (1) (Regular Research Florida Atlantic University, USA paper) (2) Online Privacy Foundation, USA Simulation-Based Validation for Smart Grid Environments 85 Wonkyu Han, Michael Mabey and Gail-Joon Ahn (Regular Research paper) Arizona State University, USA A Moving Target Defense Approach for Protecting Resource-Constrained Distributed Devices 146 Valentina Casola (1) , Alessandra De Benedictis (1) and Massimiliano Albanese (2) (Regular Research (1) paper) University of Naples Federico II, Italy (2) George Mason University, USA Session A12 (Blue
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliometric Study in Support of Norway's Strategy for International Research Collaboration
    Bibliometric Study in Support of Norway's Strategy for International Research Collaboration Final report Bibliometric Study in Support of Norway's Strategy for International Research Collaboration Final report © The Research Council of Norway 2014 The Research Council of Norway P.O.Box 2700 St. Hanshaugen N–0131 OSLO Telephone: +47 22 03 70 00 Telefax: +47 22 03 70 01 [email protected] www.rcn.no/english The report can be ordered at: www.forskningsradet.no/publikasjoner or green number telefax: +47 800 83 001 Design cover: Design et cetera AS Printing: 07 Gruppen/The Research Council of Norway Number of copies: 150 Oslo, March 2014 ISBN 978-82-12-03310-8 (print) ISBN 978-82-12-03311-5 (pdf) Bibliometric Study in Support of Norway’s Strategy for International Research Collaboration Final Report March 14, 2014 Authors Alexandre Beaudet David Campbell Grégoire Côté Stefanie Haustein Christian Lefebvre Guillaume Roberge Other contributors Philippe Deschamps Leroy Fife Isabelle Labrosse Rémi Lavoie Aurore Nicol Bastien St-Louis Lalonde Matthieu Voorons Contact information Grégoire Côté, Vice-President, Bibliometrics [email protected] Brussels | Montreal | Washington Bibliometric Study in Support of Norway’s Strategy for Final Report International Research Collaboration Contents Contents .................................................................................................................. i Tables ................................................................................................................... iii
    [Show full text]
  • On the Necessity of Multiple University Rankings
    COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management ISSN : 0973 – 7766 (Print) 2168 – 930X (Online) DOI : 10.1080/09737766.2018.1550043 On the necessity of multiple university rankings Lefteris Angelis Nick Bassiliades Yannis Manolopoulos Nowadays university rankings are ubiquitous commodities; a plethora of them is published every year by private enterprises, state authorities and universities. University rankings are very popular to governments, journalists, university administrations and families as well. At the same time, they are heavily criticized as being very subjective and contradic- tory to each other. University rankings have been studied with respect to political, educational and data management aspects. In this paper, we Lefteris Angelis* focus on a specific research question regarding the alignment of some School of Informatics well-known such rankings, ultimately targeting to investigate the use- Aristotle University of fulness of the variety of all these rankings. First, we describe in detail Thessaloniki the methodology to collect and homogenize the data and, second, we Thessaloniki 54124 statistically analyze these data to examine the correlation among the dif- Greece ferent rankings. The results show that despite their statistically signifi- [email protected] cant correlation, there are many cases of high divergence and instability, which can be reduced by ordered categorization. Our conclusion is that Nick Bassiliades if, in principle, someone accepts the reliability of university rankings, School of Informatics the necessity and the usefulness, of all of them is questionable since Aristotle University of only few of them could be sufficient representatives of the whole set. Thessaloniki The overabundance of university rankings is especially conspicuous for Thessaloniki 54124 the top universities.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposal Evaluation Panel (PEP) and Site Characterization Panel (SCP) Meeting: 19 – 21 June 2013 Santa Cruz, CA USA
    Proposal Evaluation Panel (PEP) and Site Characterization Panel (SCP) Meeting: 19 – 21 June 2013 Santa Cruz, CA USA Proposal Evaluation Panel – PEP -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Richard Arculus** Australian National University Jang-Jun Bahk Korea Institute of Geoscience & Mineral Resources (KIGAM) Jennifer Biddle University of Delaware Tim Bralower** Pennsylvania State University Beth Christensen Adelphi University Peter Clift Louisiana State University Adélie Delacour Université Jean Monnet Jörg Geldmacher GEOMAR-Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Marguerite Godarda Montpellier 2 University Verener Heuer University of Bremen Barbara John University of Wyoming Jun-ichi Kimurab JAMSTEC Dick Kroon* The University of Edinburgh Kathie Marsagliac California State University, Northridge Lisa McNeill University of Southampton Katsuyoshi Michibayashi Shizuoka University Tomoaki Morishita Kanazawa University Craig Moyerd Western Washington University Masafumi Murayama Kochi University Clive Neal University of Notre Dame Hiroshi Nishi Tohoku University Matt O'Regan Stockholm University Koichiro Obana Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC) Stuart Robinson University College London Amelia Shevenell** University of South Florida Ashok Singhvi Physical Research Laboratory David Smith University of Rhode Island Michael Strasser** ETH Zurich Nabil Sultan IFREMER Yohey Suzuki The University of Tokyo Yoshinori Takano** Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science
    [Show full text]
  • NTS-Asia-Monograph-Coronavirus
    Table of Contents Foreword 2 About the Authors 3 Acknowledgements 4 Introduction 5 Chapter One Pathogen Research Networks in China: Origins and Steady Development 8 Chapter Two Chinese Biosafety Level 4 Laboratories and Their Key International Linkages 21 Chapter Three Critical Assistance from Virology Networks Abroad 26 Chapter Four The Future of Chinese Virology Laboratories: China as “Number One”? 37 Appendix Graphs of Transnational Networks: China, the West and the Rest 42 Bibliography 51 NTS-Asia Monograph 1 Foreword The importance of paying close attention to health security has become more urgent than ever as the world continues to deal with the devastating impact of COVID-19 pandemic. Since its outbreak in 2020, the pandemic caused by a novel coronavirus SARS-Cov-2 has already resulted in millions of lives lost and inflicted untold human misery and suffering to people globally. The Centre for Non-Traditional Security (NTS) Studies of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies (RSIS), Nanyang Technological University, is one of the leading centres in Asia that highlights the critical linkages between non-traditional security challenges, like climate change and health security, to national and global security. As we have seen, the COVID-19 pandemic is more than a public health emergency of international concern. Its severe impacts cut across economic security, food security, environmental security and personal security, among others. As the international community continues to grapple with the consequential impact of COVID-19, it is sobering to note that other pandemics are expected to emerge. Thus, the need to advance the global agenda of pandemic preparedness and response cannot be overstated given the evolving nature of emerging infectious diseases.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings in One File
    1st Symposium on Information Management and Big Data 8th, 9th and 10th September 2014 Cusco - Peru PROCEEDINGS © SIMBig, Andina University of Cusco and the authors of individual articles. Proceeding Editors: J. A. Lossio-Ventura and H. Alatrista-Salas TABLE OF CONTENTS SIMBig 2014 Conference Organization Committee SIMBig 2014 Conference Reviewers SIMBig 2014 Paper Contents SIMBig 2014 Keynote Speaker Presentations Full and Short Papers The SIMBig 2014 Organization Committee confirms that full and concise papers accepted for this publication: • Meet the definition of research in relation to creativity, originality, and increasing humanity's stock of knowledge; • Are selected on the basis of a peer review process that is independent, qualified expert review; • Are published and presented at a conference having national and international significance as evidenced by registrations and participation; and • Are made available widely through the Conference web site. Disclaimer: The SIMBig 2014 Organization Committee accepts no responsibility for omissions and errors. 3 SIMBig 2014 Organization Committee GENERAL CHAIR • Juan Antonio LOSSIO VENTURA, Montpellier 2 University, LIRMM, Montpellier, France • Hugo ALATRISTA SALAS, UMR TETIS, Irstea, France LOCAL CHAIR • Cristhian GANVINI VALCARCEL Andina University of Cusco, Peru • Armando FERMIN PEREZ, National University of San Marcos, Peru • Cesar A. BELTRAN CASTAÑON, GRPIAA, Pontifical Catholic University of Peru • Marco RIVAS PEÑA, National University of San Marcos, Peru 4 SIMBig 2014 Conference Reviewers • Salah Ait-Mokhtar, Xerox Research Centre Europa, FRANCE • Jérôme Azé, LIRMM - University of Montpellier 2, FRANCE • Cesar A. Beltrán Castañón, GRPIAA - Pontifical Catholic University of Peru, PERU • Sandra Bringay, LIRMM - University of Montpellier 3, FRANCE • Oscar Corcho, Ontology Engineering Group - Polytechnic University of Madrid, SPAIN • Gabriela Csurka, Xerox Research Centre Europa, FRANCE • Mathieu d'Aquin, Knowledge Media institute (KMi) - Open University, UK • Ahmed A.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Science in Canada: Meeting the Challenge, Seizing the Opportunity
    OCEAN SCIENCE IN CANADA: MEETING THE CHALLENGE, SEIZING THE OPPORTUNITY Appendices Science Advice in the Public Interest OCEAN SCIENCE IN CANADA: MEETING THE CHALLENGE, SEIZING THE OPPORTUNITY The Expert Panel on Canadian Ocean Science ii Ocean Science in Canada: Meeting the Challenge, Seizing the Opportunity Table of Contents Appendix A Additional Information on Canada’s Capacity in Ocean Science .......................................1 A1 Human Capacity............................................................................................................................................ 1 A2 Organizations and Networks .......................................................................................................................... 2 A3 Ocean Science Funding ................................................................................................................................. 3 Appendix B Bibliometric Comparisons of Canada to Other Leading Countries in Ocean Science .....5 B1 Bibliometric Entities ....................................................................................................................................... 5 B2 Canada’s Position in Ocean Science Output Relative to Other Leading Countries by Research Theme ...... 5 B3 Collaboration Between Canadian Organizations in Ocean Science .............................................................. 11 B4 Collaboration Between International Organizations in Ocean Science ......................................................... 13 B5 Canada’s International
    [Show full text]
  • INSTITUTE of HUMAN GENETICS December 2013
    INSTITUTE OF HUMAN GENETICS Scientifi c Report CNRS UPR 1142 - MONTPELLIER - FRANCE http://www.igh.cnrs.fr December 2013 LAYOUT & DESIGN Catherine Larose, Communication and Training Program, IGH Montpellier PICTURES Office de tourisme Montpellier Cyril Sarrauste de Menthière, IGH Montpellier COVER ILLUSTRATION Stem Cell Reports 2013, Drosophila ovarioles showing the presence of germline stem cells (GSCs) at the anterior tip of the germarium in wild-type ovarioles (long structures) and the lack of GSCs in ovarioles mutant for the CCR4 deadenylase (short structures). Staining was with DAPI (blue), anti-Vasa as a marker of germ cells (red), and 1B1 to label the spherical spectrosome in GSCs (green). The CCR4 deadenlylase is required for GSC self-renewal through its role in translational repression of differentiation mRNAs. For more information on how CCR4 acts in GSC self-renewal and on its interactors and mRNA target. Simonelig, M., IGH, Montpellier http://www.igh.cnrs.fr CONTACT / DIRECTION Institut de Génétique Humaine Dr. Giacomo CAVALLI 141 Rue de la Cardonille 34396 MONTPELLIER cedex 5 FRANCE Phone : +33 (0)4 34 35 99 04 / + 33 (0)4 34 35 99 70 Fax : +33 (0)4 34 35 99 99 [email protected] Contents Introduction 2 GENOME DYNAMICS Department 8 Giacomo Cavalli 9 Séverine Chambeyron 11 Jérôme Déjardin 13 Bernard de Massy 15 Reini fernandez de Luco 17 Nicolas Gilbert 19 Rosemary Kiernan 21 Marcel Méchali 23 GENETICS & DEVELOPMENT Department 26 Brigitte Boizet 27 Jean-Maurice Dura 29 Anne Fernandez & Ned Lamb 31 Kzrysztof Rogowski
    [Show full text]
  • INSTITUTE of HUMAN GENETICS August 2011
    INSTITUTE OF HUMAN GENETICS Scientific Report August 2011 CNRS UPR 1142 - MONTPELLIER - FRANCE http://www.igh.cnrs.fr Contents Introduction 2 GENOME DYNAMICS Department 8 Ounissa Aït Ahmed 9 Giacomo Cavalli 11 Séverine Chambeyron 13 Jérôme Déjardin 15 Bernard de Massy 17 Nicolas Gilbert 19 Rosemary Kiernan 21 Marcel Méchali 23 GENETICS & DEVELOPMENT Department 26 Brigitte Boizet 27 Jean-Maurice Dura 29 Anne Fernandez & Ned Lamb 31 Kzrysztof Rogowski 33 Martine Simonelig 35 MOLECULAR BASES OF HUMAN DISEASES Department 38 Monsef Benkirane 39 Angelos Constantinou 41 Pierre Corbeau 43 Dominique Giorgi & Sylvie Rouquier 45 Marie-Paule Lefranc 47 Sylvain Lehmann 49 Domanico Maiorano 51 Philippe Pasero 53 ADMINISTRATION AND OTHER SERVICES 56 SEMINAR SPEAKERS 66 PUBLICATIONS 73 Giacomo Cavalli Director Philippe Pasero Associate Director Brigitte Mangoni-Jory Administrator RESEARCH Administration Services « Genome Dynamics » Department Information technology Secretariat Assistant Director : B. De Massy department Anne-Pascale Botonnet Giacomo Cavalli : Chromatin and Cell Biology Guillaume Gielly - Jacques Faure Marcel Méchali : Réplication et Genome Dynamics Administrative Secretariat Web development & Jérôme Dejardin : Biology of Repetitive Silke Conquet Iconography Sequences Cyril Sarrauste de Menthière Séverine Chambeyron : RNA Silencing and Control of Transposition Financial Management Bernard De Massy : Meiosis and Sahondra Rakotondramasy Cell Imaging Facility Recombination Marie-Claire Merriot Julien Cau Ounissa Aït Ahmed : Meiosis and Chromosome
    [Show full text]
  • Fostering of Advanced Female Scientists at Ochanomizu University - Be the Next Marie Curie!
    【Name of Institution】 Division of Advanced Sciences, Graduate School of Humanities and Sciences Ochanomizu University 【Project Title】 Fostering of Advanced Female Scientists at Ochanomizu University - Be the Next Marie Curie! - 【Project Outline】 In this program, students are sent to the European research institutes where many female researchers have been raised to national prominence. The aim of the program corresponds to the Third Phase of Basic Program for Sciences and Technology that promotes the increase of newly hired female researchers’ ratio in natural science institutes to 25 %. This three-step program is also targeted to establish a successful model of human resource development that shall be prevailed in and out of our institute. Three characteristics of the program are stated below. 1) This program is designed to broaden academic horizon of the students. In this program, students majoring in physics or chemistry have to take subjects from related fields of their study. 2) The selected students will be enrolled in a support program in which they will take various courses such as language training, presentation skills, crisis management and cross-cultural understanding to acquire basis of self-presentation and global view. 3) In conjunction with the first step of this program in which master’s students will participate in the 1-semester or 4 months oversee training program, the second step, the oversee research program for doctoral students, will accomplish its overall goal of effective human resource development. From experience during the first step of the program, students will become aware of the importance of broadening their own views and may exert themselves at school work.
    [Show full text]