Chapter 26 Gradation Design of Sand and Gravel Filters

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chapter 26 Gradation Design of Sand and Gravel Filters UnitedChapter States 26 Gradation Design of Sand and Part 633 Department of PartGravel Filters 633 National Engineering Handbook Agriculture Natural National Resources Conservation Engineering Service Handbook Chapter 26 Gradation Design of Sand and Gravel Filters (210-vi–NEH, October 1994) 26–1 Chapter 26 Gradation Design of Sand and Part 633 Gravel Filters National Engineering Handbook Issued October 1994 The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimina- tion in its programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, and marital or familial status. (Not all pro- hibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720- 2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint, write the Secretary of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC 20250, or call 1-800-245-6340 (voice) or (202) 720-1127 (TDD). USDA is an equal employment opportunity employer. 26–2 (210-vi–NEH, October 1994) Chapter 26 Gradation Design of Sand and Part 633 PrefaceGravel Filters National Engineering Handbook Most of the criteria in this document was originally issued in Soil Mechan- ics Note 1, revised January 1986. This revision of Soil Mechanics Note 1 and any future revisions of other Soil Mechanics Notes will be placed in the National Engineering Handbook, Part 633, Soil Engineering. This material is Chapter 26, Gradation Design of Sand and Gravel Filters. (210-vi–NEH, October 1994) 26–326–i Chapter 26 Gradation Design of Sand and Part 633 AcknowledgmentsGravel Filters National Engineering Handbook The criteria in this document are based on the results of an extensive labo- ratory filter study carried out by the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) at the Soil Mechanics Laboratory in Lincoln, Nebraska, from 1980 to 1985. The principals involved in this study were Lorn P. Dunnigan, SCS (retired), James R. Talbot, SCS (retired), and James L. Sherard, consultant (deceased). Revisions were developed in 1993 by Danny K. McCook, assistant head, Soil Mechanics Laboratory, SCS, Fort Worth, Texas; Charles H. McElroy, head of the Soil Mechanics Laboratory, SCS, Fort Worth, Texas; and James R. Talbot, national soils engineer, SCS, Washington, DC (retired). Danny McCook developed the example problems. Special recognition is given to the following Soil Conservation Service engineers for their many helpful comments during the review process: Philip N. Jones, Lincoln, Nebraska; Christine M. Portillo, Fort Worth, Texas; William G. Hughey, Chester, Pennsylvania; and Clifton E. Deal, Portland, Oregon. Special thanks also to the following persons in the Technical Publishing Section of the National Cartography and GIS Staff, SCS, Fort Worth, Texas: Wendy Pierce for the graphic illustrations, Suzi Self for desktop publish- ing, and Mary Mattinson for her editorial contributions. 26–426–ii (210-vi–NEH, October 1994) Chapter 26 Gradation Design of Sand and Part 633 Chapter 26Gravel Gradation Filters Design ofNational Sand Engineering Handbook and Gravel Filters Contents: 633.2600 Purpose 26–1 633.2601 Basic purpose of filters and drains 26–1 633.2602 Permeability and capacity 26–2 633.2603 Determining filter gradation limits 26–2 633.2604 Definitions 26–37 633.2605 References 26–37 633.2606 Appendixes Appendix 26A Steps in Filter Design ........................................................ 26A–1 Appendix 26B Standard ASTM Aggregate Specifications ...................... 26B–1 Tables Table 26–1 Regraded gradation curve data 26–3 Table 26–2 Filtering criteria — Maximum D15 26–3 Table 26–3 Permeability criteria 26–3 Table 26–4 Other filter design criteria 26–3 Table 26–5 Maximum and minimum particle size criteria 26–4 Table 26–6 Segregation criteria 26–5 Table 26–7 Criteria for filters used adjacent to perforated 26–5 collector pipe Table 26–8 Design specification gradation for example 26–1 soil 26–8 Table 26–9 Design specification gradation for example 26–2 soil 26–13 Table 26–10 Design specification gradation for example 26–16 26–2A soil Table 26–11 Design specification limits for clayey gravel base soil 26–21 Table 26–12 The final selected design filter band gradation 26–25 for silty sand base soil (210-vi–NEH, October 1994)26–iii 26–5 Chapter 26 Gradation Design of Sand and Part 633 Gravel Filters National Engineering Handbook Table 26–13 Data for designed filter band 26–29 Table 26–14 Design filter band data for example 26–6 soil 26–34 Table 26B–1 Selected standard aggregate gradations 26–41 Figures Figure 26–1 Grain size distribution curve for fine clay base soil 26–9 Figure 26–2 Grain size distribution curve for silty sand with 26–14 gravel base soil—Category 3 Figure 26–2A Grain size distribution curve for silty sand with 26–17 gravel base soil where primary function is filter Figure 26–2B Grain size distribution curve for silty sand 26–18 with gravel base soil Figure 26–3 Grain size distribution curve for clayey gravel 26–22 base soil Figure 26–4 Grain size distribution curve for silty sand base soil 26–26 Figure 26–5 Gravel filter band design 26–30 Figure 26–5A Gravel filter band design using an extended 26–31 coarse filter limit Figure 26–6 Grain size distribution curve for very fine clay 26–36 base soil Figure 26B–1 Standard aggregate gradations 26–43 26–626–iv (210-vi–NEH, October 1994) Chapter 26 Gradation Design of Sand and Part 633 Gravel Filters National Engineering Handbook Examples Example 26–1 Fine clay base soil—Category 1 26–7 Example 26–2 Silty sand with gravel base soil—Category 3 26–11 Example 26–2A Silty sand with gravel base soil—Category 3 26–15 Example 26–3 Clayey gravel base soil—Category 2 26–19 Example 26–4 Silty sand base soil—Category 4 26–23 Example 26–5 Design of a coarse filter to be compatible 26–27 with a previously designed fine filter and used around a perforated pipe Example 26–6 Very fine clay base soil—Category 1 26–33 (210-vi–NEH, October 1994) 26–726–v Chapter 26 Gradation Design of Sand and Part 633 Chapter 26Gravel Gradation Filters Design ofNational Sand Engineering and Handbook Gravel Filters 633.2600 Purpose 633.2601 Basic purpose of filters and drains Chapter 26 presents criteria for determining the grain- size distribution (gradation) of sand and gravel filters Filters are placed in embankment zones, foundations, needed to prevent internal erosion or piping of soil in or other areas of hydraulic structures for two pur- embankments or foundations of hydraulic structures. poses: These criteria are based on results of an extensive • To intercept water flowing through cracks or laboratory filter study carried out by the Soil Conser- openings in a base soil and block the move- vation Service at the Soil Mechanics Laboratory in ment of eroding soil particles into the filter. Lincoln, Nebraska, from 1980 to 1985. (See Section Soil particles are caught at the filter face, 633.2605, References, for published reports.) reducing the flow of water through cracks or openings and preventing further erosion and Refer to section 633.2604 for definitions used in this enlargement of the cracks or openings. chapter. • To intercept water flowing through the pores of the base soil, allowing passage of the water while preventing movement of base soil par- ticles. Without filters, piping of susceptible base soils can occur when seepage gradients or pressures are high enough to produce erosive discharge velocities in the base soil. The filter zone is generally placed upstream of the discharge point where sufficient confine- ment prevents uplift or blow-out of the filter. Drains consist of sand, gravel, or a sand and gravel mixture placed in embankments, foundations, and backfill of hydraulic structures, or in other locations to reduce seepage pressure. A drain’s most important design feature is its capacity to collect and carry water to a safe outlet at a low gradient or without pressure build-up. Drains are often used downstream of or in addition to a filter to provide outlet capacity. Combined filters and drains are commonly used. The filter is designed to function as a filter and as a drain. (210-vi–NEH, October 1994) 26–1 Chapter 26 Gradation Design of Sand and Part 633 Gravel Filters National Engineering Handbook 633.2602 Permeability and 633.2603 Determining fil- capacity ter gradation limits The laboratory filter study clearly demonstrated that Determine filter gradation limits using the following graded filters designed in accordance with these steps: criteria will seal a crack. The sealing begins when water flows through a crack or opening and carries Step 1: Plot the gradation curve (grain-size soil particles eroded from the sides of the openings. distribution) of the base soil material. Use enough Eroding soil particles collect on the face of the filter samples to define the range of grain sizes for the base and seal the crack at the interface. Any subsequent soil or soils. Design the filter using the base soil that flow is through the pores of the soil. If filters are requires the smallest D15 size for filtering purposes. designed to intercept cracks, the permeability required Base the design for drainage purposes on the base soil in the filter zone should be based on the steady state that has the largest D15 size. seepage flow through the pores of the base soil alone. The hydraulic capacity of any cracks need not be Step 2: Proceed to step 4 if the base soil contains considered in designing the filter because the cracks no gravel (material larger than No. 4 sieve).
Recommended publications
  • Ground Modification Methods Reference Manual – Volume I NOTICE
    U.S. Department of Transportation Publication No. FHWA-NHI-16-027 Federal Highway Administration FHWA GEC 013 April 2017 NHI Course No. 132034 Ground Modification Methods Reference Manual – Volume I NOTICE The contents of this document reflect the views of the authors, who are responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect policy of the Department of Transportation. This document does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturer’s names appear herein only because they are considered essential to the objective of this document. COVER PHOTO CREDITS Upper left: Massachusetts Department of Transportation Upper middle: MixOnSite USA, Inc. Upper right: Bob Lukas, Ground Engineering Consultants, Inc. Lower left: Menard Group USA Lower middle: Subsurface Constructors Lower right: Hayward Baker Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FHWA-NHI-16-027 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING CIRCULAR NO. 13 December 2016 GROUND MODIFICATION METHODS - REFERENCE MANUAL 6. Performing Organization Code VOLUME I 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Vernon R. Schaefer, Ryan R. Berg, James G. Collin, Barry R. Christopher, Jerome A. DiMaggio, George M. Filz, Donald A. Bruce, and Dinesh Ayala 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Ryan R. Berg & Associates, Inc. 2190 Leyland Alcove 11. Contract or Grant No. Woodbury, MN 55125 DTFH61-11-D-00049/0009 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered National Highway Institute U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Utilizing Hyperspectral Remote Sensing for Soil Gradation
    remote sensing Letter Utilizing Hyperspectral Remote Sensing for Soil Gradation Jordan Ewing 1, Thomas Oommen 2,* , Paramsothy Jayakumar 3 and Russell Alger 4 1 Department of Computational Science and Engineering, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Geological and Mining Engineering and Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, USA 3 U.S. Army CCDC Ground Vehicle Systems Center, Warren, MI 48092, USA; [email protected] 4 The Institute of Snow Research, Keweenaw Research Center, Calumet, MI 49913, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 19 September 2020; Accepted: 9 October 2020; Published: 12 October 2020 Abstract: Soil gradation is an important characteristic for soil mechanics. Traditionally soil gradation is performed by sieve analysis using a sample from the field. In this research, we are interested in the application of hyperspectral remote sensing to characterize soil gradation. The specific objective of this work is to explore the application of hyperspectral remote sensing to be used as an alternative to traditional soil gradation estimation. The advantage of such an approach is that it would provide the soil gradation without having to obtain a field sample. This work will examine five different soil types from the Keweenaw Research Center within a laboratory-controlled environment for testing. Our study demonstrates a correlation between hyperspectral data, the percent gravel and sand composition of the soil. Using this correlation, one can predict the percent gravel and sand within a soil and, in turn, calculate the remaining percent of fine particles. This information can be vital to help identify the soil type, soil strength, permeability/hydraulic conductivity, and other properties that are correlated to the gradation of the soil.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 8(19) Special 2014, Pages: 271-275
    Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 8(19) Special 2014, Pages: 271-275 AENSI Journals Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences ISSN:1991-8178 Journal home page: www.ajbasweb.com The Relationship of Particle Gradation and Relative Density with Soil Shear Strength Parameters from Direct Shear Tests 1Z. Ahsan, 1Z. Chik, 2Z. Abedin 1Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering & Built Environment Bangi, Malaysia. 2Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Department of Civil Engineering, Bangladesh ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: Background: Soil shear strength is an essential parameter for any kind of geo- Received 15 April 2014 structural design or stability analysis. Therefore it is important to understand the Received in revised form 22 May influence of other soil properties such as particle gradation and relative density on its 2014 shear strength parameters. Objective: This paper discusses the effects of different Accepted 25 October 2014 particle gradations and relative densities reconstituted in laboratory on the shear Available online 10 November 2014 strength of coarse grained soil (sand). As for cohesion less soil the value of c is zero, only angle of internal friction was determined. Because of the simplicity and wide use Keywords: of direct shear method, the angle of internal friction was determined using this method. Angle of internal friction; direct shear Tests were conducted on sylhet sand with 3 different gradations and at 3 different test; particle gradation; relative relative densities. Results: Results show that for gradation with higher uniformity density. coefficient soil shear strength tends to increase linearly while for higher coefficient of curvature it follows a decreasing trend.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Gradation and Fines Content on the Undrained
    THE EFFECT OF GRADATION AND FINES CONTENT ON THE UNDRAINED LOADING RESPONSE OF SAND by Ralph H. Kuerbis B.A.Sc, The University of British Columbia, 1985 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF APPLIED SCIENCE in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES Department of Civil Engineering We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA June 1989 © Ralph H. Kuerbis In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of Civil Engineering The University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada Date July 5. 1989 DE-6 (2/88) ABSTRACT A systematic study of the effect of grain size, gradation and silt content on the monotonic and cyclic undrained loading response of sand is presented. The objective of the study is to gain an improved understanding of the behaviour of fluvial and hydraulic fill sands. A slurry method of deposition is developed to prepare homogeneous specimens of well-graded and silty sands, and to simulate hydraulic fill or fluvial deposition processes. Various soil gradations consolidated from loosest state of slurry deposition are shown to have similar triaxial compression loading behaviour, but quite different triaxial extension loading behaviour.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Conglomerations Gradation on Engineering Properties of Loess
    The effect of conglomerations gradation on engineering properties of loess Efecto de la gradación de conglomerados en las propiedades de ingeniería de loess Dequan Kong (Main and Corresponding Author) School of Civil Engineering, Chang’an University No. 75 of Chang’an Middle Road, 710061, Xi’an (China) [email protected] Rong Wan School of Civil Engineering, Chang’an University, No. 75 of Chang’an Middle Road, 710061, Xi’an (China) State Key Laboratory of Green Building in Western China Xi’an University of Architecture & Technology No. 13 of Yanta Middle Road, 710055, Xi’an (China) [email protected] Manuscript Code: 1335 Date of Acceptance/Reception: 05.08.2019/30.01.2019 DOI: 10.7764/RDLC.18.2.375 Abstract Loess is a kind of common and important building materials in civil engineering. Particle size distribution has a significant effect on loess engineering properties and there are many studies in this filed. Due to the chemical cementation and the molecular attraction in the loess, the particles are usually gathered together and appear in the form of conglomerations. The conglomeration is much larger than the particle and easy to crush. The study on the influence of conglomeration gradation on the engineering properties of loess is relatively less and needs to be enriched. In view of this, the loess samples with different conglomeration gradations are prepared, and the compaction test, compression test and direct shear test are carried out. The test results show that the conglomeration gradation has a certain effect on the maximum dry density and shear strength of loess. But the effect on compression test is not significant.
    [Show full text]
  • SOIL FORMATION Soil Formation Is a Continuous Process and Is Still in Action Today
    RETURN TO TOC Chapter 2 Soils The soil in an area is an important consideration in selecting the exact location of a structure. Military engineers, construction supervisors, and members of engineer reconnaissance parties must be capable of properly identifying soils in the field to determine their engineering characteristics. Because a military engineer must be economical with time, equipment, material, and money, site selection for a project must be made with these factors in mind. SECTION I. FORMATION, CLASSIFICATION, AND FIELD IDENTIFICATION The word soil has numerous meanings and connotations to different groups of professionals who deal with this material. To most soil engineers (and for the purpose of this text), soil is the entire unconsolidated earthen material that overlies and excludes bedrock. It is composed of loosely-bound mineral grains of various sizes and shapes. Due to its nature of being loosely bound, it contains many voids of varying sizes. These voids may contain air, water, organic matter, or different combinations of these materials. Therefore, an engineer must be concerned not only with the sizes of the particles but also with the voids between them and particularly what these voids enclose (water, air, or organic materials). SOIL FORMATION Soil formation is a continuous process and is still in action today. The great number of original rocks, the variety of soil-forming forces, and the length of time that these forces have acted all produce many different soils. For engineering purposes, soils are evaluated by the following basic physical properties: • Gradation of sizes of the different particles. • Bearing capacity as reflected by soil density.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering Field Manual
    United States Department of Agriculture Engineering Field Soil Conservation Sewice Manual Chapter 4. Elementarv Soil Use bookmarks and buttons to navigate Contents Page Page Classifying Coarse-Grained Soils ..............................4-10 Soils with less than 5 percent fines .......................4-10 @ Basic Concepts .......................................................... 4-2 Soils with 12 to 50 percent fines ...........................4-11 Soil ...............................................................................4-2 Soils with 5 to 12 percent fines .............................4-11 Soil Solids ....................................................................4-2 Summary ...................................................................4-13 Soil Voids .....................................................................4-2 Origin ...........................................................................4-2 @ Field Identification and Description of Soils ..............4-19 Structure .................................................................... 4-2 Dual and Borderline Classes ................................ 4-19 Soil Water ....................................................................4-3 Apparatus needed for the tests .............................4-19 Volume-Weight Relationships...................................... 4-3 Sample size ..........................................................4-19 Void ratio .................................................................4-4 Field classification .....................................................4-19
    [Show full text]
  • From Basic Particle Gradation Parameters to Water Retention Curves and Tensile Strength of Unsaturated Granular Soils
    Case Study From Basic Particle Gradation Parameters to Water Retention Curves and Tensile Strength of Unsaturated Granular Soils Ji-Peng Wang1; Bertrand François2; and Pierre Lambert3 Abstract: The long-debated effective stress definition of unsaturated soils is believed to be correlated to suction, the degree of saturation, and the less mentioned interfacial areas. The tensile strength of unsaturated soils is directly associated with the effective stress definition in theory, and it is also crucial in engineering practices. For unsaturated soils, the relationship between suction and degree of saturation can be described as the water retention curve (WRC), which is related to the pore-size distribution. In the meanwhile, the air–water interfacial area is also regarded as a function of the degree of saturation, and parameters of the function are determined by the soil’s pore structures. For granular soils, the pore-size distribution is usually in a unimodal shape and, therefore, the strength properties can also be related to the particle gra- dation parameters. In this study, a preliminary estimation method is proposed for the tensile strength of unsaturated sandy soils based on basic particle gradation parameters. In this method, with basic physical features considered, WRC is estimated from a characteristic grain diameter (d60) and the coefficient of uniformity (Cu). The function to determine the air–water interfacial area is also formulated by soil gradation parameters of the mean grain-size (d50), the coefficient of uniformity (Cu), and the void ratio. The proposed tensile strength estimation is compared with experimental measurements on sandy soils, which shows fair agreement, especially for the conventional split plate method.
    [Show full text]
  • The Unified Soil Classification System
    RETURN TO TOC Appendix B The Unified Soil Classification System The adoption of the principles of soil mechanics by the engineering profession has inspired numerous attempts to devise a simple classification system that will tell the engineer the properties of a given soil. As a consequence, many classifications have come into existence based on certain properties of soils such as texture, plasticity, strength, and other characteristics. A few classification systems have gained fairly wide acceptance, but rarely has any system provided the complete information on a soil that the engineer needs. Nearly every engineer who practices soil mechanics will add judgment and personal experience as modifiers to whatever soil classification system he uses. Obviously, within a given agency (where designs and plans are reviewed by persons entirely removed from a project) a common basis of soil classification is necessary so that when an engineer classifies a soil as a certain type, this classification will convey the proper characteristics and behavior of the material. Further than this, the classification should reflect those behavior characteristics of the soil that are pertinent to the project under consideration. BASIS OF THE USCS The USCS is based on identifying soils according to their textural and plasticity qualities and on their grouping with respect to behavior. Soils seldom exist in nature separately as sand, gravel, or any other single component. They are usually found as mixtures with varying proportions of particles of different sizes; each component part contributes its characteristics to the soil mixture. The USCS is based on those characteristics of the soil that indicate how it will behave as an engineering construction material.
    [Show full text]
  • Mndot GRADING & BASE MANUAL
    MnDOT GRADING & BASE MANUAL (Note: Use with the 2018 standard specifications. Use the 2016 Grading and Base Manual with the 2016 and prior standard specifications.) Published by Geotechnical Section Grading & Base Unit August 23, 2017 Foreword Grading and Base construction utilizes large quantities of materials. The control of the quality and placement of these materials involves the application of various test procedures and inspection techniques to ensure the materials and the manner in which they are placed comply with the specification requirements. The manual’s procedures help ensure uniformity of methods and that materials are placed as specified. Grading and Base Engineer Minnesota Department of Transportation Preface The final control of the quality of materials and their use is accomplished by the Engineer and Inspectors. Field personnel verify that materials meet the specifications, and procedures are followed. This manual specifies: sampling, testing and inspection requirements. Emphasis has been placed on procedures for field use and the application of the test results in controlling aggregate production and construction methods. Included is a section on soils classification. Table of Contents 5-692.000 General ........................................................................................................................1 5-692.001 Duties of the Inspector ................................................................................................1 5-692.002 Grading Construction ..................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Estimation of Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity of Granular Soils from Particle Size Parameters
    water Article Estimation of Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity of Granular Soils from Particle Size Parameters Ji-Peng Wang 1 , Pei-Zhi Zhuang 2,*, Ji-Yuan Luan 1, Tai-Heng Liu 1, Yi-Ran Tan 1 and Jiong Zhang 1,* 1 School of Civil Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China 2 School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK * Correspondence: [email protected] (P.-Z.Z.); [email protected] (J.Z.) Received: 26 July 2019; Accepted: 28 August 2019; Published: 31 August 2019 Abstract: Estimation of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity could benefit many engineering or research problems such as water flow in the vadose zone, unsaturated seepage and capillary barriers for underground waste isolation. The unsaturated hydraulic conductivity of a soil is related to its saturated hydraulic conductivity value as well as its water retention behaviour. By following the first author’s previous work, the saturated hydraulic conductivity and water retention curve (WRC) of sandy soils can be estimated from their basic gradation parameters. In this paper, we further suggest the applicable range of the estimation method is for soils with d10 > 0.02 mm and Cu < 20, in which d10 is the grain diameter corresponding to 10% passing and Cu is the coefficient of uniformity (Cu = d60/d10). The estimation method is also modified to consider the porosity variation effect. Then the proposed method is applied to predict unsaturated hydraulic conductivity properties of different sandy soils and also compared with laboratory and field test results. The comparison shows that the newly developed estimation method, which predicts the relative permeability of unsaturated sands from basic grain size parameters and porosity, generally has a fair agreement with measured data.
    [Show full text]
  • Compaction Manual 2020
    COMPACTION OF FILL MATERIALS Course Reference Manual BUREAU OF PROJECT DELIVERY INNOVATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES DIVISION GEOTECHNICAL SECTION APRIL 2020 Table of Contents Preface.............................................................................................................................................. i Chapter 1 – INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................2 1.1 Construction Materials ..................................................................................................... 2 1.2 How is Soil Different from Other Construction Materials ............................................... 3 Chapter 2 - WHAT IS COMPACTION...........................................................................................5 2.1 Definition of Compaction................................................................................................. 5 2.2 Why is Compaction Important ......................................................................................... 7 2.2.1 Increased Shear Strength .............................................................................................. 8 2.2.2 Decreased Hydraulic Conductivity ............................................................................... 8 2.2.3 Pavement Performance ............................................................................................... 10 Chapter 3 – SOIL PROPERTIES ..................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]