Madison Police Policy Manual

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Madison Police Policy Manual MADISON POLICE POLICY MANUAL Introduction 1-100 Glossary 1-200 Operating Philosophies and Goals of the Madison Police Department 1-300 Policies and Procedures Conduct 2-100 Standard of Conduct and Code of Ethics 2-200 General Regulations Community Relations 3-100 Tours and Ride-Alongs 3-200 District Station Community Meeting Rooms 3-300 Madison Police Explorer Post 911 3-400 Honor Guard 3-500 Dignitary Protection 3-600 News Media Relations Personnel 4-100 Organizational Chart 4-200 Commissioned Personnel General Duties 4-300 Uniform Standards 4-400 Personal Appearance 4-500 Police Weaponry 4-600 Identification of Police Officers 4-700 Off-Duty Officer Responsibilities 4-800 Temporary Restricted Duty Assignment 4-900 Outside Employment 4-1000 Political Activity 4-1100 Promotional Process 4-1200 Departmental Awards 4-1300 Complaint Acceptance and Investigation 4-1400 Administration of Sanctions/Discipline Personnel Assistance 5-100 Line of Duty, Life-Threatening Injury or Death of an Employee 5-200 Critical Incident Response 5-300 Significant Exposure to Blood Borne Pathogens 5-400 Employee Assistance Program (EAP) 5-500 Civil Actions Against Police Department Employees 5-600 Temporary Administration Leave Use of Force and Call Response 6-100 The Use of Deadly Force 6-200 The Use of Non-Deadly Force 6-300 Guidelines for the Operation of Emergency Vehicles 6-400 Mutual Aid Requests 01-Final.doc Contacts, Arrests, Searches 7-100 Arrest, Incarceration and Bail - Adults 7-200 Investigations, Arrest, Search - Juveniles 7-300 Stop & Frisk 7-400 Searches 7-500 Handling of Evidence, Contraband, Found or Lost Property Investigations 8-100 Critical Incident Analysis 8-200 Barricaded Person/Sniper/Hostage Situations 8-300 Robberies in Progress and Silent Robbery Alarms 8-400 Bomb Threats 8-500 Investigation of Certain Person Crimes / Incidents 8-600 Investigating Sexual Assaults and Their Attempts 8-700 Eyewitness Identification 8-800 Domestic Abuse 8-900 Taking Custody of Newborn 8-1000 Landlord Tenant Disputes 8-1100 Trespassing 8-1200 Traffic Enforcement 8-1300 Computer Crimes Investigation Special Circumstances 9-100 Demonstrations and Assemblies 9-200 Labor Disputes and Picketing 9-300 Intoxicated Persons 9-400 Persons Who Exhibit Abnormal Behavior - Mentally Ill Persons 9-500 Enforcement of Obscenity and Pornography Statutes and Ordinances 9-600 Enforcement of Immigration Laws Resources 10-100 Police Canine Use 10-200 Interpreters 10-300 Confidential Sources of Information Police Records 11-100 Reporting Procedures 11-200 Policy Guidance for Inspection of Public Records and Documents Equipment 12-100 In-Car Data Capture System 12-200 Use of Mobile Data Terminals / Mobile Data Computers 12-300 Automatic External Defibrillator 12-400 Vehicle Assignment and Parking 12-500 Property Equipment Control 01-Final.doc MADISON POLICE DEPARTMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1-100 Glossary 1-200 Operating Philosophies and Goals of the Madison Police Department 1-300 Policies and Procedures 01-Final.doc MADISON POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY 1-100 1-100 GLOSSARY ABSENCE WITH LEAVE A period during which members are authorized by the Chief of Police, or the Mayor, to be absent from their regular duties with pay. BEAT A district assigned to officers during their tour of duty which has definite boundaries. BEREAVEMENT LEAVE Bereavement leave includes absence from duty because of death in the family of the employee. Bereavement leave shall be afforded in accordance with City policy and applicable labor contracts. COMMANDING OFFICER A supervisor having a rank, either temporarily or permanently, of Lieutenant or higher. DISRESPECT Rejection, contempt or ridicule demonstrated by overt action or communication toward another member of the department. GENERAL ORDER A permanent order issued by the Chief of Police, not relating to a specific circumstance or situation. LEAVE OF ABSENCE A leave of absence is defined as any period of time during which a member of the department is authorized by the Chief of Police to be excused from duty without pay. LENGTH OF SERVICE Shall be from date on which the oath of office was last administered or the latest date of appointment to the department. MEMBERS OF THE DEPARTMENT Members of the department include all personnel on the Police Department Roster, commissioned and civilian. OFF-DUTY That period during which a member is free from specified routine duties. 01-Final.doc MADISON POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY 1-100 OFFICER A generic term applied to every commissioned member of the department regardless of sex, rank, or duty. ON-DUTY That period when members are actively engaged in the performance of their duties. ORDER Verbal or written instructions given by a ranking officer to a subordinate. POLICY Consists of principles and values which regulate a department activity by providing an “operating standard” that will be used to measure and evaluate performance. Its formulation is based upon experience, community desires, ethics and the letter and spirit of the law. Policy is articulated to inform the public and department employees of the principles which will be adhered to in the performance of the police function. In areas not subject to mandatory declaration, policy establishes “operating standards” to assist department employees in the necessary exercise of discretion in discharging their responsibility. RANKING OFFICER Officer having highest rank. Seniority between officers of the same rank shall be determined by date of appointment to that rank. When two or more officers are appointed to the same rank on the same date, their seniority shall be determined by the order in which they are selected by the Chief of Police from the panels of eligibles approved by the Board of Police and Fire Commissioners. When two or more officers are on-duty together, the officer of the highest rank is in command and will be held responsible. When two Police Officers are at a scene, the assigned district officer will be responsible. For a special detail and for a specific period, an officer may be designated by the commanding officer to take command without regard for rank. REASONABLE The standard of “reasonable” behavior called for by policies will be based on the individual member’s actions in terms of how a rational and prudent person would conduct him/herself in any given situation. In making judgments, members should balance considerations of their own personal safety, the safety of the public, the protection of the rights of individuals, and law enforcement needs of the community. REPORT A written communication unless otherwise specified. It may be a verbal exchange followed by a written communication which must be completed before a member goes off-duty, unless otherwise authorized by the appropriate supervisor. 01-Final.doc MADISON POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY 1-100 SICK LEAVE Sick leave includes absence from duty because of illness; bodily injury when not a worker’s compensation case; exposure to contagious disease; and serious illness in the immediate family of the employee. Bereavement leave shall be afforded in accordance with City policy and applicable labor contracts. SPECIAL DUTY Police service which, by its nature, requires that a member be excused from the performance of his/her regular routine duties. SPECIAL ORDER An order issued by the Chief of Police regarding a specific circumstance or situation. SUPERVISOR A generic term applied to every member having supervisory responsibility, either temporary or permanent, over other employees. THROUGH OFFICIAL CHANNELS Through the hands of commanding officers, or chain of command. 01-Final.doc MADISON POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY 1-200 1-200 OPERATING PHILOSOPHIES AND GOALS OF THE MADISON POLICE DEPARTMENT We, the members of the Madison Police Department, are guided by the highest ethical standards. We provide the highest quality of personalized services to all who live, work, visit, learn and recreate in our City. We do this by empowering employees who build partnerships with the community and other service providers to prevent and solve crime, lessen fear, and reduce neighborhood problems. We are committed to enhancing our community’s safety and quality of life through continuous improvement of our work. We are a community-oriented police department as defined by the people we serve. We believe in the dignity of all people and respect individual and constitutional rights in fulfilling this mission. OBJECTIVES The objectives of the Madison Police Department are: 1. to protect constitutional guarantees for all persons; 2. to create and maintain a feeling of security in the community; 3. to reduce the opportunities for the commission of crime; 4. to aid individuals who are in danger of physical harm and assist those individuals who cannot care for themselves; 5. to resolve conflict; 6. to identify criminal offenders and criminal activity and, where appropriate, apprehend offenders and participate in subsequent court proceedings; 7. to identify problems that are potentially serious law enforcement or governmental problems; 8. to facilitate the movement of people and vehicles; and 9. to provide other police services to the community. In order to achieve the above objectives, the Madison Police Department stands committed to: 1. provide a continual training program to insure professional competence and development of personal and organizational discipline in order to carry out departmental goals and objectives; 2. recognize the importance of planning functions to develop programs which will address major goals and objectives of the department; 3. cooperate with related public and private agencies in pursuit of their major goals; and 01-Final.doc MADISON POLICE DEPARTMENT POLICY 1-200 4. emphasize a continual willingness to study and initiate new and better police services for the community. VISION We strive to be a dynamic, continuously improving organization devoted to Service Excellence in making our city a safer and healthier place to live, learn, work and play. MISSION STATEMENT The Mission of the Madison Police Department is to work in partnerships to create safer neighborhoods and preserve our special quality of life.
Recommended publications
  • Women, Health and Imprisonment Catrin
    THE IMPRISONED BODY: WOMEN, HEALTH AND IMPRISONMENT CATRIN SMITH THESIS SUBMITTED FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (SEPTEMBER 1996) DbEFNYDDIO TN er LLYFRGELL, Th U.= TO tE CqNSULTED 11BRARY UNIVERSITY OF WALES, BANGOR SCHOOL OF SOCIOLOGY AND SOCIAL PO I was never allowed to forget that being a prisoner, even my body was not my own (Maybrick, 1905 :112). The idea that law has the power to right wrongs is persuasive. Just as medicine is seen as curative rather than iatrogenic, so law is seen as extending rights rather than creating wrongs (Smart, 1989: 12) Abstract Problems affecting the female prison population have become increasingly acute. In response to a spirit of 'toughness' in penal policy, the number of women prisoners has grown sharply and more women are being sent to prison despite arguments in favour of decarceration and alternative sanctions. In prison, women make greater demands on prison health services and are generally considered to carry a greater load of physical and mental ill-health than their male counterparts. However, a gender-sensitive theory based on an understanding of the relationship between women's health and women's imprisonment has not been formulated. Health is a complex phenomenon of inseparable physical, mental and social processes. Research conducted in three women's prisons in England set out to explore the relationships between these processes. Data were generated from group discussions, in-depth interviews, a questionnaire survey and observation and participation in 'the field'. The findings suggest that women's imprisonment is disadvantageous to 'good' health. Deprivations, isolation, discreditation and the deleterious effects of excessive regulation and control all cause women to suffer as they experience imprisonment.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 April 12, 2012 Daniel H. Heyns Director Michigan Department Of
    April 12, 2012 Daniel H. Heyns Director Michigan Department of Corrections 206 E. Michigan Avenue Grandview Plaza P.O. Box 30003 Lansing, MI 48909 Fax: (517) 373-6883 Email: [email protected] VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL, EMAIL AND FACSIMILE Re: Ending the Routine Use of Sexually Abusive and Unnecessary Spread-Labia Vaginal Searches of Women Prisoners Dear Mr. Heyns: We represent a broad array of civil rights, human rights, health, and religious organizations united in our dedication to stopping the sexual humiliation of women prisoners. We write to demand a decisive end to a degrading type of visual body cavity search practiced at the Women’s Huron Valley Correctional Facility (WHV), the only women’s prison in the State of Michigan. While an investigation by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has caused a partial, and likely temporary, modification of the search procedure, we urge you to revise Policy Directive 04.04.110 to explicitly and permanently ban the practice. The Spread-Labia Vaginal Search and Its Effect on Women Prisoners When being subjected to the spread-labia vaginal search, women prisoners are forced to remove all of their clothing, sit on a chair, lift their legs into the air, and use their hands to spread open their vaginas as a prison guard peers into their vaginal cavities. Sometimes multiple women are forced to undergo this humiliating search in view of one another. If a woman objects to the search, she can be forced to submit through physical force or punished with solitary confinement. These searches occur routinely, including after each contact visit, even when guards have no reason to suspect that a particular woman is carrying contraband in her body.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Privacy and the Fight Over Access to Sex-Segregated Spaces
    NOTES CONSTITUTIONAL PRIVACY AND THE FIGHT OVER ACCESS TO SEX-SEGREGATED SPACES The battle over transgender rights is raging on many fronts. Despite some local1 and national2 victories for transgender activists in the past few years, the battle is far from over. States like North Carolina have tried to bar transgender people from using bathrooms and locker rooms not matching their birth-assigned sexes.3 At the federal level, President Donald Trump’s Department of Justice and Department of Education have revoked Obama-era guidance protecting transgender students in schools.4 President Trump also rolled back protection for transgender servicemembers: on July 26th, 2017, he tweeted that transgender people should be barred from serving in the U.S. military,5 and a version of his ban went into effect in 2019.6 This Term, the Supreme Court will de- termine whether Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964’s7 prohibition ––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– 1 For example, at least 225 cities and counties now protect employees from discrimination on the basis of gender identity. See Cities and Counties with Non-discrimination Ordinances that Include Gender Identity, HUM. RTS. CAMPAIGN, https://www.hrc.org/resources/cities-and-counties- with-non-discrimination-ordinances-that-include-gender [https://perma.cc/PB5D-PV4H]. 2 Under President Barack Obama, federal agencies instructed schools to “treat a student’s gender identity as the student’s sex for purposes of Title IX.” See Dear Colleague Letter on Transgender Students from Catherine E. Lhamon, Assistant Sec’y for Civil Rights, U.S. Dep’t of Educ., & Vanita Gupta, Principal Deputy Assistant Att’y Gen.
    [Show full text]
  • Strip Searching in the Age of Colorblind Racism: the Disparate Impact of Florence V
    Michigan Journal of Race and Law Volume 21 2015 Strip Searching in the Age of Colorblind Racism: The Disparate Impact of Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Burlington André Keeton LaGuardia Community College-City University of New York, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjrl Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Law and Race Commons, and the Law Enforcement and Corrections Commons Recommended Citation André Keeton, Strip Searching in the Age of Colorblind Racism: The Disparate Impact of Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Burlington, 21 MICH. J. RACE & L. 55 (2015). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjrl/vol21/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Journal of Race and Law by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STRIP SEARCHING IN THE AGE OF COLORBLIND RACISM: THE DISPARATE IMPACT OF FLORENCE V. BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS OF THE COUNTY OF BURLINGTON Andr´e Keeton* In 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Burlington.1 The Court held that full strip searches, including cavity searches, are permissible regardless of the existence of basic reasonable suspicion that the arrestee is in possession of con- traband.2 Further, the Court held that law enforcement may conduct full strip searches after arresting an individual for a minor offense and irrespective of the circumstances surrounding the arrest.3 These holdings upended typical search juris- prudence.
    [Show full text]
  • Naked in Front of the Machine: Does Airport Scanning Violate Privacy?
    Naked in Front of the Machine: Does Airport Scanning Violate Privacy? YOFI TIRoSH* & MICHAEL BIRNHACKt TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................... 1263 II. THE TECHNOLOGY AND ITS LEGAL ENVIRONMENT ...... ....... 1269 A. The Technology and Its Design .............. ...... 1271 B. Timeline and Legal Authority ........................ 1275 C. Experiencing the Scanners. ....................... 1276 D. The (Hidden)Judicial Conception of Privacy.... ...... 1278 1. Legal Challenges ..................... ...... 1278 2. Administrative Search and Balancing ............. 1280 3. Deciphering the Court's Privacy Conception.... .... 1283 4. Balancing with a Missing Variable ............... 1285 III. Two DISSONANCES ............................ ....... 1286 A. The Dress/UndressDissonance ............... ..... 1287 B. The Normal/Abnormal Dissonance ................. 1293 C. Privacy and Shame ...................................1299 1. Privacy? ................................. 1299 2. Shame? ....................................... 1302 IV. CONCLUSION........................ .................... 1305 I. INTRODUCTION There is a fierce battle going on over the social and legal construction of new surveillance technologies that are rapidly becoming part of our daily lives. One such surveillance technology is full-body scanners, officially known as Advanced Imaging Technology (AIT).' Body scanners were deployed in airports across the United States in 2007.2 By June 2013, the Transportation * Senior lecturer, Faculty of Law,
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Appendix TOC Vol 2 Edited
    USCA Case #16-1135 Document #1651335 Filed: 12/15/2016 Page 1 of 370 ORAL ARGUMENT NOT YET SCHEDULED No. 16-1135, consolidated with No. 16-1139 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE, et al., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., Respondents. ON PETITION FOR REVIEW OF FINAL RULE OF TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION JOINT APPENDIX VOLUME II OF II (JA 416 – JA 773) BENJAMIN C. MIZNER MARC ROTENBERG Principal Deputy Assistant Counsel of Record Attoney General ALAN BUTLER CHANNING D. PHILLIPS JERAMIE SCOTT United States Attorney Electronic Privacy Information Center MARK B. STERN 1718 Connecticut Ave. NW, Suite 200 SHARON SWINGLE Washington, DC 20009 (202) 353-2689 (202) 483-1140 Attorneys, Appellate Staff Counsel for Petitioner Civil Division, Room 7250 Electronic Privacy Information Center U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W. SAM KAZMAN Washington, D.C. 20530 HANS BADER COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE 1310 L Street NW, 7th Floor Washington, DC 20005 (202) 331-2278 Counsel for Petitioner December 15, 2016 Competitive Enterprise Institute USCA Case #16-1135 Document #1651335 Filed: 12/15/2016 Page 2 of 370 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page VOLUME I Passenger Screening Using Advanced Imaging Technology, Final Rule (Mar. 3, 2016) (81 Fed. Reg. 11364) ............................................................................................ JA 000001 Passenger Screening Using Advanced Imaging Technology; Regulatory Impact Analysis and Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (Feb. 18, 2016) ............................ JA 000044 Privacy Impact Assessment for TSA Whole Body Imaging (Jan. 2, 2008) ................................................................... JA 000203 TSA Blog, Pilot Program Tests Millimeter Wave for Primary Passenger Screening (Feb. 20, 2009) .............................
    [Show full text]
  • Indecent Exposure: Do Warrantless Searches of Cell Phones Violate the Fourth Amendment?
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository University of New Hampshire – Franklin Pierce Law Faculty Scholarship School of Law 1-1-2012 Indecent Exposure: Do Warrantless Searches of Cell Phones Violate the Fourth Amendment? Amy Vorenberg University of New Hampshire School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/law_facpub Part of the Fourth Amendment Commons, Other Education Commons, Other Educational Administration and Supervision Commons, and the Privacy Law Commons Recommended Citation Amy Vorenberg, "Indecent Exposure: Do Warrantless Searches of Cell Phones Violate the Fourth Amendment?" 17 BERKELEY J. CRIM L. 62 (2012). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of New Hampshire – Franklin Pierce School of Law at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Law Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Vorenberg: Indecent Exposure: Do Warrantless Searches of a Student's Cell Ph ISSUE 17.1 SPRING 2012 Indecent Exposure: Do Warrantless Searches of a Student’s Cell Phone Violate the Fourth Amendment? Amy Vorenberg* INTRODUCTION Alex D.1 was bored and drifting as he sat in his English Literature class one gray winter day. Looking to amuse himself, he did what many teens do. He looked down at his cell phone to check for messages. Alex knew he was violating a school rule that prohibited cell phone use during class, but he figured he could get away with it.
    [Show full text]
  • NYSDA Backup Center Report
    New York State Defenders Association REPORTPublic Defense Backup Center VOLUME XV NUMBER 4 May-June 2000 A P U B L I C A T I O N O F T H E D E F E N D E R I N S T I T U T E Defender News Post-Conviction DNA Deadline 9/1/00 Robert D. Lonski has been Administrator of the Erie County Bar Association Aid to Indigent Prisoners Society, In 1999, the legislature amended the Criminal Procedure Inc. Assigned Counsel Program, maintaining a panel of 500 Law to provide convicted defendants with a right to appeal attorneys, since 1993. Among his other experiences in work- from a trial court order denying a post-judgment motion for ing for the community of clients unable to afford retained DNA testing of evidence. See L 1999, ch 560, amending CPL legal services were serving as Executive Director of Legal 450.10; People v Rae Kellar, 89 NY2d 948 (1997). The right to Services for the Elderly, Disabled or Disadvantaged of West- appeal was made retroactive to any motion for forensic DNA ern New York and as a Staff Attorney with Prisoners’ Legal testing brought and determined since CPL 440.30 (1-a) was Services of New York, Inc., where he began in 1985. He enacted in 1994. The legislature has now established Sept. 1, received his J.D. in 1984 at SUNY Buffalo. The Criminal 2000 (or 30 days from notice of entry, whichever is later) as the Justice Section of the NYS Bar Association recognized his final date for the filing of a notice of appeal from such an order outstanding contributions to the delivery of defense services entered between 1994 and Dec.
    [Show full text]
  • Margaret Atwood Nan A. Talese Doubleday New
    margaret atwood Nan A. Talese Doubleday New York London Toronto Sydney Auckland Contents Title Page Dedication Quotes 1 Mango ~ Flotsam ~ Voice 2 Bonfire ~ OrganInc Farms ~ Lunch 3 Nooners ~ Downpour 4 Rakunk ~ Hammer ~ Crake ~ Brainfrizz ~ HottTotts 5 Toast ~ Fish ~ Bottle 6 Oryx ~ Birdcall ~ Roses ~ Pixieland Jazz 7 Sveltana ~ Purring ~ Blue 8 SoYummie ~ Happicuppa ~ Applied Rhetoric ~ Asperger’s U. ~ Wolvogs ~ Hypothetical ~ Extinctathon 9 Hike ~ RejoovenEsense ~ Twister 10 Vulturizing ~ AnooYoo ~ Garage ~ Gripless 11 Pigoons ~ Radio ~ Rampart 12 Pleebcrawl ~ BlyssPluss ~ MaddAddam ~ Paradice ~ Crake in Love ~ Take out ~ Airlock 13 Bubble ~ Scribble ~ Remnant 14 Idol ~ Sermon 15 Footprint Acknowledgments About the Author By Margaret Atwood For my family I could perhaps like others have astonished you with strange improbable tales; but I rather chose to relate plain matter of fact in the simplest manner and style; because my principal design was to inform you, and not to amuse you. Jonathan Swift, Gulliver’s Travels Was there no safety? No learning by heart of the ways of the world? No guide, no shelter, but all was miracle and leaping from the pinnacle of a tower into the air? Virginia Woolf, To the Lighthouse 1 ~ Mango ~ Snowman wakes before dawn. He lies unmoving, listening to the tide coming in, wave after wave sloshing over the various barricades, wish-wash, wish-wash, the rhythm of heartbeat. He would so like to believe he is still asleep. On the eastern horizon there’s a greyish haze, lit now with a rosy, deadly glow. Strange how that colour still seems tender. The offshore towers stand out in dark silhouette against it, rising improbably out of the pink and pale blue of the lagoon.
    [Show full text]
  • Do You Need a License to Strip in Florida
    Do You Need A License To Strip In Florida Is Olivier always clinquant and remarkable when alligators some malingerers very granularly and unfittingly? Sollar Nev still extraversivefeminizes: chicken and dallies and divaricate upspringing Maison while masqueradesawheel Pepe quiteundersupplied currently butand dilated assembling. her bridewells thievishly. Bartie is Both license needs of doing security fund for. What do licensing from dancer rotation of license? Click the strip bars tend to do you loose some dancers per song for doing security inside and licenses can handle the visitors associated controversy over time. Vip bottle lounge in south florida driver license to look in miami lakes, you do a to strip in need to prevent this is. This week to secure clean and in florida minimum, although i suspected that. Egregious or license needs improvement across the strip clubs make money. Human trafficking are issued with strip a license in need to do you and maintain order. Amas must be set by state tries to it that in need a license strip florida to do you cannot be as bartenders rarely be. In florida department, do licensing your license needs of doing it cost of work of a percentage of red bull at washington state. If you do licensing your license needs are doing you for florida shut down and licenses. What type of the npu, colazzo hired as pimps too big sign has operated as construction and usually select a strip a in need to do you turn, some clubs are you? Among miami locals, as far as they do you a to strip in need for a lawsuit against trafficking of a qualified and everyone if she falls off stage.
    [Show full text]
  • The Illinois Strip Search Statute, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 425 (1990)
    UIC Law Review Volume 23 Issue 3 Article 6 Spring 1990 Naked before the Law: The Illinois Strip Search Statute, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 425 (1990) Vito LoVerde Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.uic.edu/lawreview Part of the Fourth Amendment Commons, and the State and Local Government Law Commons Recommended Citation Vito LoVerde, Naked before the Law: The Illinois Strip Search Statute, 23 J. Marshall L. Rev. 425 (1990) https://repository.law.uic.edu/lawreview/vol23/iss3/6 This Comments is brought to you for free and open access by UIC Law Open Access Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in UIC Law Review by an authorized administrator of UIC Law Open Access Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NAKED BEFORE THE LAW: THE ILLINOIS STRIP SEARCH STATUTE The Illinois Strip Search Statute was enacted on September 21, 1979. The statute severely limits the circumstances under which strip searches can be conducted by providing that no person ar- rested for a traffic, regulatory, or misdemeanor offense, can be strip searched unless there is a reasonable belief that the person is con- cealing a weapon or controlled substance.' The penalty provision of 1. ILL. REV. STAT. ch. 38, para. 103-1 (1989) (effective Sept. 21, 1979) provides: Rights on arrest. (a) After an arrest on a warrant the person making the arrest shall inform the person arrested that a warrant has been issued for his arrest and the nature of the offense specified in the warrant. (b) After an arrest without a warrant the person making the arrest shall inform the person arrested of the nature of the offense on which the arrest is based.
    [Show full text]
  • CITYWIDE HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT for LGBTQ HISTORY in SAN FRANCISCO Donna J
    CITYWIDE HISTORIC CONTEXT STATEMENT FOR LGBTQ HISTORY IN SAN FRANCISCO Donna J. Graves & Shayne E. Watson © GREG DAY Prepared for the City & County of San Francisco October 2015 October 2015 | Copyright City and County of San Francisco TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION .........................................................................1 CHAPTER 2. LGBTQ HISTORY ..........................................................................4 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND – CALIFORNIA AND SAN FRANCISCO .......5 Early INFLUENCES ON LGBTQ IDENTITIES AND COMMUNITIES (19TH Century TO 1950S) ........................................................................13 Early DEVELOPMENT OF LGBTQ COMMUNITIES (Early 20TH Century TO 1960S) .............................................................52 POLICING AND HARASSMENT (1933 TO 1960S)...................................105 HOMOPHILE MOVEMENTS (1950S TO 1960S) ......................................132 EVOLUTION OF LGBTQ ENCLAVES AND DEVELOPMENT OF NEW NEIGHBORHOODS (1960S TO 1980S) ..........................................157 Gay Liberation, PRIDE, AND POLITICS (1960S TO 1990S) .................180 BUILDING LGBTQ COMMUNITIES (1960S TO 1990S) ...........................238 LGBTQ MEDICINE (1940S TO 1970S) .....................................................286 SAN FRANCISCO AND THE AIDS EPIDEMIC (1981 TO 1990S) .............292 CHAPTER 3. METHODOLOGY .....................................................................316 CHAPTER 4. HOW-TO-GUIDE FOR PRESERVING LGBTQ HISTORIC PROPERTIES IN SAN
    [Show full text]