THE IMPERIUM V1.01

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

THE IMPERIUM V1.01 THE IMPERIUM v1.01 THE IMPERIUM The pre-eminent power in central Europe, the Imperium is a mighty colossus that spans the continent from the shores of the Baltic to the warmer climes of the Adriatic. From its capital in Berlin, the network of industry, rail and military might is harnessed for the good of its citizens. The Kaiser and his supporters, the enigmatic and powerful Teutonic Knights, are surrounded by enemies but are confident in their ability to marshal their forces and destroy utterly those who would threaten their glorious realm. Let them come and break their strength upon the bulwark of civilisation; the Imperium shall not go shrinking into the darkness like some thief in the night. Blood and Iron! v1.01 THE IMPERIUM [Decoded on the 21st May 1869 From the files Each of these nations, whilst nominally of the Deuxième Bureau.] an equal partner in the affairs of the Imperium, are in reality subservient to Mme. Ombre, the will of the dominant power of Prussia. Apologies for the unorthodox method of The Prussian King is also the Imperium’s transmitting this information to you, my Kaiser, the absolutist and authoritarian normal contact with the Second Bureau has monarch whose enlightened despotism been interrupted after an encounter with vouchsafes the security of Europe against our Teutonic friends. I have spoken to the the decadent western powers and the Professor as you requested, and liaised with tyranny of the Russian Commonwealth our mutual contact with the Lodge, but do to the east. [Deuxième Bureau Note: Of not have anything to report on the particular course, Agent Renard paraphrases their questions you asked. propaganda here.] I was, however, able to complete the task you The current Kaiser, Friedrich Grunder, assigned me in Heidelberg, and will despatch is lauded as the “Grandfather of Europe” the result through the secondary channel. by the patriotic Imperialists of these four nations – but the monolithic edifice he The watchword, as ever, will be and his forebears constructed is anything “Represailles”. Our usual cipher will suffice but. There are weaknesses that could be this time. exploited by a well-funded and equipped Sincerely, foe, and only by carefully examining the Le Renard nations’ and the Imperium’s history can we hope to exploit. [Deuxième Bureau Note: [Deuxième Bureau Note: The papers Appended to the original report was a hastily arrived via Geneva two days later. We have, scribbled note where Agent Renard requests unfortunately, not had any further contact funds to cover a debt he owes to the local with Agent Renard in Heidelberg. Either he police constable after his last breach of curfew. remains under observation or has been seized Perhaps this oversight caught up with him?] by the Teutonic Knights. Recommendation for further action has been passed to the Bureau NEITHER HOLY, NOR ROMAN Chief. The decoded papers are attached below.] Over one thousand years ago, His Holiness THE CROSS OF EUROPE the Pope crowned the Frankish King Charlemagne Kaiser of the Romans. The Imperium is a super-state that bestrides This act revived the long lost Roman central Europe like a colossus, composed Empire in Western Europe, and after a of the hereditary domains of the Kingdoms four hundred year hiatus, gave Europeans of Prussia, the extensive territories of an “Imperator” once again. This was the Confederation of Scandinavia, the a politically calculated move, granting Royal House of Bavaria and the Austro- Charlemagne the sovereignty he claimed Hungarian Empire. over other European rulers, whilst simultaneously giving the Pope great temporal as well as spiritual power. THE IMPERIUM v1.01 Of course, the reality was rather different On several occasions the Holy Roman from the propaganda. Charlemagne’s Empire fell into civil war, with the “empire” was hardly deserving of the term, various German states and greater powers and whilst unchallenged in his own day, competing with one another for territory, his successors were never truly recognised wealth and divine favour as they sought as Kaisers in the sense that they were ultimate mastery over their neighbours. superior to any of the kings and queens who In the end, a curious form of natural selection surrounded them. No attempt was made to eventually won out. The major dynastic truly revive the traditions and structures houses, who could command greater wealth, of the Roman Republic or its Empire, and military forces and loyalty from their whilst Charlemagne passed into history, subjects (regardless of religious confession – the state he left behind was little different many were to enforce compromises on such from the feudal kingdoms that surrounded issues), absorbed or dominated the latter. it. [Deuxième Bureau Note: Imperium By the time of our Revolution, the Holy propaganda is similarly grandiose in style, but Roman Empire was officially dominated by likewise devoid of substance if you have the the House of Habsburg and the Prussian and wit to see through it.] Bavarian Kings. Nonetheless, the Holy Roman Empire he During the campaigns of the late Kaiser, formed would endure beyond his death, the influence and power of the Habsburgs bequeathed first to his own dynasty and then in Austria was greatly diminished. The to others. In time, the autocratic emperors Austrian claims to Northern Italy were who ruled it lost their overwhelming power. bloodily repudiated, and Napoleon I Each major city and province, as well as invaded Austria itself on several occasions. some bishoprics and petty kingdoms, were The pressure was maintained by his afforded the right to elect their Kaiser upon successors during the ill-fated reign of the death of his or her predecessor. Thus, “Emperor” Joseph, when the marshals the Holy Roman Empire became a multi- narrowly defeated Austria at the Battle layered and complex state of Free Cities, of Austerlitz in 1805. [Deuxième Bureau Principalities, Domains and more besides, Note: Although the subsequent defeat at Jena, all ruled by their own noble dynasties and despite the death of the Prussian King, was a with an overlord of their own choosing. major setback.] THE GREAT CONFLAGRATIONS THE RISE OF HEINRICH OTTO Such a complex mixture of feudal and With Habsburg power humbled, and the semi-democratic systems was sure to Prussian king dead, the French marshals create tension and division. As some wrongly believed that the power of the great houses grew in power (in particular Holy Roman Empire had been dealt a the Habsburgs of Austria) and influence, crushing blow. Of course, as we now know, others waned and grew envious. Throw that confidence was misplaced. into this mixture the heady emotions of reforming religion and you have a tailor In 1806, outraged electors demanded the made recipe for war and violence. abdication of the Habsburg Kaiser Franz, v1.01 THE IMPERIUM whose failure to defeat the French marshals military minds of the day: Blucher, had badly damaged confidence in the Clausewitz, Gneisenau, Scharnhorst and already weakened Austrian military. The more. These individuals were to form abdication of a Holy Roman Emperor was the Kaiser’s “braintrust” for a stunning not entirely without precedent, but it was a intervention in European affairs. dramatic turn of events that paved the way First, however, the Kaiser had to build up for the rise of a completely new leader. his military might after its bludgeoning With the death of King Friedrich Wilhelm at the hands of the French Grand Armée III at the Battle of Jena, the Prussian not two years earlier. Major new military crown had mysteriously passed beyond factories were established, with millions of the House of Hohenzollern to the, at that Marks invested in all manner of military point, obscure German aristocrat Heinrich designs. Across the territories of the Holy Otto. It has proven impossible to determine Roman Empire, a massive network of exactly how the succession was decided, but railways spread like some strange living his apparently limitless source of wealth thing, connecting every conceivable area and boundless determination to see Prussian in a world-class transportation network. glory restored no doubt inspired much of [Deuxième Bureau Note: Quite apart from the support. [Deuxième Bureau Note: There the military applications of swift lines of are Teutonic files on his succession, or at least supply and communication, the rail network that’s what Agent Renard’s source at the local served to make swift civilian transportation Lodge tells him.] from all the areas of the Empire practicable for the first time. Indeed, Agent Renard When the time came to choose a successor to reports that to travel on the Imperium’s high- Kaiser Franz, the new King Heinrich Otto, speed connections between Berlin and Vienna was the clear favourite. He was invested is quite an experience.] as Holy Roman Emperor on Christmas Day 1807. This was a meteoric rise out of Dwarfing all his other projects, however, comparative obscurity; so concerned was was the dramatic decision to revive (at the continent with the on-going French least publicly, more detail later) the famed Civil War that his coronation made only a Teutonic Knights of the Germanic past. few ripples in the international press. That Almost overnight, a whole infrastructure was to change. [Deuxième Bureau Note: of Lodges, Commanderies and fortresses Agent Belette in London has made it a habit to were established throughout the Holy study newspaper reports; she is attempting to Roman Empire under the new terms of create an analytical theory of deduction using an Imperial Charter for the Knights’ such things.] use. Whole factories worth of military material, some of it highly experimental, THE COMING STORM ended up in the hands of the new Teutonic military machine: the Ritterorden.
Recommended publications
  • A Property Rights Perspective to the Study of Nationalism
    PART I Agrarian Moment: Land and Freedom The frst part of the book deals with the agrarian moment of this his- tory of nationalism in the US and Norway. The time period covered is roughly the years between 1760 and 1815. Within this time period both the elite of the American colonies and in the Kingdom of Norway declared independence from the empires to which they had belonged for centuries. This was based on an ideology of nationalism, which was, at the time, a novelty. In the course of this part of the book, I seek to show how the new ideology of nationalism emerged as a powerful political force in the landed, agrarian societies of colonial America and Oldenburg Norway. The main focus of Part I will be on demonstrating how landed property relations in the two societies were important for how the national ideology formed. After a short general introduction to theagrarian world of the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century, Chapter 2 starts by looking at the American colonies. The peculiar property relations of colonial America that was marked by widespread ownership of land will be noted, and then the discussion moves on to the imperial crisis between the col- onies and the imperial capital of London. There will be a focus on how key public fgures asserted the property rights of colonial Americans, and how they came to connect this to the idea of popular sovereignty and, fnally, to national independence. Main events covered will be the Declaration of Independence and the Constitutional Convention. Next, Chapter 3 moves east across the Atlantic to Norway.
    [Show full text]
  • St. Ignatius of Antioch in the City of New York
    the church of St. Ignatius of Antioch in the city of new york The Feast of the Epiphany of our Lord (Ecce advenit) 6 January 2021 Welcome to all who are worshiping with us this evening. Especially if you are a visitor or a newcomer, please make yourself known to one of the clergy and let us know if we can be of help to you. Solemn Mass – 7:00 P.M. Prelude Das alte Jahr vergangen ist BWV 614 Johann Sebastian Bach (1685–1750) At the Solemn Mass Introit: Ecce advenit dominator Dominus Mode II Ecce advenit dominator Dominus: et regnum Behold, he appeareth, the Lord and Ruler: and in in manu ejus, et potestas, et imperium. V. Deus, his hand the kingdom, and power, and dominion. judicium tuum regida: et justitiam tuam filio V. Give the King thy judgements, O God: and thy regis. V. Gloria Patri, et Filio, et Spiritui Sancto. righteousness unto the King’s Son. V. Glory be Sicut erat in principio, et nunc, et semper, et in to the Father, and to the Son, and to the Holy saecula saeculorum. Amen. Ecce advenit... Ghost. As it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be, world without end. Amen. Behold, he appeareth... (Malachi 3 & Psalm 72) Opening Acclamation Celebrant Blessed be God: Father, Son, and Holy Spirit. People And blessed be his kingdom, now and for ever. Amen. Collect for Purity Prayer Book, page 323 Summary of the Law Prayer Book, page 324 2 Ordinary of the Mass: Mass for Three Voices William Byrd (1543-1623) Kyrie eleison yrie eleison.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Death in Ancient Rome
    Reading Death in Ancient Rome Reading Death in Ancient Rome Mario Erasmo The Ohio State University Press • Columbus Copyright © 2008 by The Ohio State University. All rights reserved. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Erasmo, Mario. Reading death in ancient Rome / Mario Erasmo. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-0-8142-1092-5 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-8142-1092-9 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Death in literature. 2. Funeral rites and ceremonies—Rome. 3. Mourning cus- toms—Rome. 4. Latin literature—History and criticism. I. Title. PA6029.D43E73 2008 870.9'3548—dc22 2008002873 This book is available in the following editions: Cloth (ISBN 978-0-8142-1092-5) CD-ROM (978-0-8142-9172-6) Cover design by DesignSmith Type set in Adobe Garamond Pro by Juliet Williams Printed by Thomson-Shore, Inc. The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials. ANSI 39.48-1992. 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Contents List of Figures vii Preface and Acknowledgments ix INTRODUCTION Reading Death CHAPTER 1 Playing Dead CHAPTER 2 Staging Death CHAPTER 3 Disposing the Dead 5 CHAPTER 4 Disposing the Dead? CHAPTER 5 Animating the Dead 5 CONCLUSION 205 Notes 29 Works Cited 24 Index 25 List of Figures 1. Funerary altar of Cornelia Glyce. Vatican Museums. Rome. 2. Sarcophagus of Scipio Barbatus. Vatican Museums. Rome. 7 3. Sarcophagus of Scipio Barbatus (background). Vatican Museums. Rome. 68 4. Epitaph of Rufus.
    [Show full text]
  • Cicero, Caesar, and the SCU of January 49 Why Did Cicero Lay Down His Imperium in September 47 BCE in Brundisium Instead of in R
    Cicero, Caesar, and the SCU of January 49 Why did Cicero lay down his imperium in September 47 BCE in Brundisium instead of in Rome sometime in October? Scholars have long accepted, based on Pro Ligario 7, that following his meeting with Caesar on 25 September Cicero, assured that he could keep his imperium as long as he wanted and that his person was now safe, went immediately to Rome to cross the pomerium and lay down his imperium (e.g. Gelzer 1969: 263; Shackleton Bailey 1977: 504; Wistrand 1979: 199; Rawson 1983: 208). However, I argue in this paper that Caesar’s assurances were not enough to convince Cicero to lay down his imperium, and that Cicero certainly didn’t cross the pomerium in October. In order to maintain his dignitas, Cicero used Caesar’s return to Italy as a terminus for the SCU of 7 January 49 that had prorogued his imperium and activated it within Italy. The unique nature of the SCU allowed Cicero to ceremoniously lay down his imperium by returning to Brundisium instead of crossing the pomerium in Rome. Caesar’s position in September 47 was much stronger than it had been in January 49. Furthermore, Dio reports that Caesar’s return to Italy in 47 also put an end to the public emergency signaled by the SCU issued against Trebellius and Dolabella (D.C. 41.33.1). After the meeting with Caesar, Cicero had cover not only in Caesar’s assurances of safety but also in the fact that the conditions that had prolonged his imperium were no longer in existence.
    [Show full text]
  • Select Republican Political Institutions in Outline
    ____ APPENDIX: SELECT REPUBLICAN POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS IN OUTLINE (300 before 81; 600 down to 45 Bc; then 900 until SENATE. The main consiliu,’n (“advisory body”) of magistrates, itself consisting mainly of ex-magistrates step aside for others. What the Senate decided Augustus reduced it again to 600). The most senior magistrate available in Rome usually presided, but could the Senate long guided state administration and policy e,zatu.s consultant, abbreviated SC) was strictly only a recommendation to magistrates. But in actual fact, of imperium, triumphs; also the state religion, finance, and preliminary iii almost all matters, including wars, allocation of provinces, (eventually) all extensions in which case it is called patrum auctoritas. The 1isiussion of legislative bills, A SC could be vetoed (by a consul acting against his colleague, or by a tribune), more than advice. SC riltirnurn, first passed in 121, was employed in cases of extreme crisis, but again technically was no ASSEMBLIES (U: POPULUS. COMPOSED OF BOTH PATRICIANS AND PLEBEJANS (NON-PATRICIANS). cum imperia. Gave “military auspices” to consuls, praetors once elected by the Centuriate Assembly; also to dictators, non-magistrates was a consul (or sometimes apparently a practor); in Aserubly Validated in some way the powers of lower magistrates (aediles, quaestors). Its president curiae (“wards”) of the city. (c mitia Cicero’s day, it was enough for a lictor symbolically to represent each of the 30 voting (‘101010) (“infantry”), the latter divided into five classes, Centuriate Originally the army, which had centuriae as its constituent units. Equites (“cavalry”) and pedites A of these 193 voting units, not absolute A ,seni hlv ranked by census wealth, totalled 188 centuries; added to those were five unarmed centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • The High Command in the Roman Republic
    While the terminology has long been insights into the constitutional ramifica- Frederik J. Vervaet noted, the republican principle of the tions for the allocation of public triumphs, summum imperium auspiciumque, the the position of the consuls in the provinces, high command and the prevailing aus- and the official hierarchy in combined pices, has never been subject to compre- commands, highlighting the fascinating The High Command hensive scrutiny. This enquiry for the first interplay between these largely custom- time identifies this principle as a coherent ary rules of engagement and the nobility’s in the Roman Republic concept in Roman constitutional and ad- own code of honour. This study also casts ministrative practice, being the senatorial a provocative new light on how the high oligarchy’s foremost instrument to recon- command was gradually monopolized by The Principle of the summum imperium cile collegiate rule with the necessity of a dynasts in the tumultuous period between unified high command. After defining the Sulla’s dictatorship and the emergence of auspiciumque from 509 to 19 BCE relevant terms and the scope of the high the Augustan monarchy. Finally, a post- command both in Rome and in the field, a script addresses the vexed question of the number of case studies yield striking new lex curiata de imperio. The High Command in the Roman Republic Hist -E www.steiner-verlag.de 232 Alte Geschichte Historia – Einzelschriften 232 Franz Steiner Verlag Franz Steiner Verlag isbn 978-3-515-10630-6 Frederik J. Vervaet J. Frederik Frederik J. Vervaet The High Command in the Roman Republic historia Zeitschrift für Alte Geschichte | Revue d’histoire ancienne | Journal of Ancient History | Rivista di storia antica einzelschriften Herausgegeben von Kai Brodersen, Erfurt | Mortimer Chambers, Los Angeles | Martin Jehne, Dresden | Mischa Meier, Tübingen | Walter Scheidel, Stanford Band 232 Frederik J.
    [Show full text]
  • Honors Latin 3: Summer Reading Required Text Harris, Robert
    Honors Latin 3: Summer Reading Required Text Harris, Robert. Imperium: A Novel of Ancient Rome. Simon & Schuster: Reprint Edition, 2007. 9780743498661 After a thorough review of Latin grammar and syntax, Honors Latin 3 students begin the year by reading excerpts from two of Cicero's most famous speeches, Against Verres, a speech which allowed Cicero to get a foothold in Roman politics, and Against Catiline, a speech which cemented Cicero's reputation as a patriot. Robert Harris's novel Imperium brings to life the political and historical context of both of these speeches and introduces readers to the historical figures we will discuss all year. The following questions are due on the first day of class. Part I: Senator 1. What was Cicero's role in the Republic at the beginning of Imperium? 2. How does Harris present this book? I.e., what sort of book does he want us to imagine we're reading: a legal thriller, a popular history, a biography, etc.? 3. What was so sensational about Cicero's prosecution of Verres? 4. Look up the cursus honorum. Name and define the duties of the political offices on the cursus. 5. Which character (besides Cicero) has made the biggest impression on you? Why? Part II: Praetorian 6. What was Cicero's motivation for defending the ex-governor Fonteius against the Gauls' charges of corruption? Why does he feel the need to justify his actions? 7. What makes Pompey's plans to exterminate the pirates so extreme? 8. How were the praetors' courts awarded? Which court did Cicero get? What is his reaction? 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Dating the End of Cicero's Imperium in 47
    Re-Dating the End of Cicero’s Imperium in 47 BCE Scholars have accepted that Cicero laid down his imperium after a return to Rome in October 47 (e.g. Gelzer 1969, Rawson 1983, Damon 2015). The usual citation for this date is Pro Ligario 7, where Cicero claims Caesar let him fascis laureatos tenui quoad tenendos putavi. However, I will argue that it is more likely that Cicero laid down his imperium when he left Brundisium in late September rather than when he crossed the pomerium in Rome at some later date in 47. Once Cicero had received assurances from Caesar that it was safe to remain in Italy, there was no reason for him to continue to possess his proconsular imperium. My reinterpretation of Lig. 7 not only clarifies Cicero’s movements in late 47, for which we lack first-hand evidence, but also illuminates a specific component of Cicero’s strategy for refashioning himself as an independent actor, one empowered to withdraw from politics on his own terms, and not simply another recipient of Caesar’s famous clementia. Caesar may well have told Cicero to keep his imperium as long as he wished, and Cicero certainly returned to Rome by the end of 47 (Fam. 9.1). But Lig. 7 does not provide a definite date, and we lack any correspondence securely datable to October to December 47 that might settle the matter. We know that Cicero left Brundisium in late September after his meeting with Caesar, as Fam. 14.20 to Terentia was written on 1 October from Venusia.
    [Show full text]
  • Atypical Lives: Systems of Meaning in Plutarch's Teseus-Romulus by Joel Martin Street a Dissertation Submitted in Partial Satisf
    Atypical Lives: Systems of Meaning in Plutarch's Teseus-Romulus by Joel Martin Street A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Classics in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Mark Griffith, Chair Professor Dylan Sailor Professor Ramona Naddaff Fall 2015 Abstract Atypical Lives: Systems of Meaning in Plutarch's Teseus-Romulus by Joel Martin Street Doctor of Philosophy in Classics University of California, Berkeley Professor Mark Griffith, Chair Tis dissertation takes Plutarch’s paired biographies of Teseus and Romulus as a path to understanding a number of roles that the author assumes: as a biographer, an antiquarian, a Greek author under Roman rule. As the preface to the Teseus-Romulus makes clear, Plutarch himself sees these mythological fgures as qualitatively different from his other biographical sub- jects, with the consequence that this particular pair of Lives serves as a limit case by which it is possible to elucidate the boundaries of Plutarch’s authorial identity. Tey present, moreover, a set of opportunities for him to demonstrate his ability to curate and present familiar material (the founding of Rome, Teseus in the labyrinth) in demonstration of his broad learning. To this end, I regard the Teseus-Romulus as a fundamentally integral text, both of whose parts should be read alongside one another and the rest of Plutarch’s corpus rather than as mere outgrowths of the tra- ditions about the early history of Athens and Rome, respectively. Accordingly, I proceed in each of my four chapters to attend closely to a particular thematic cluster that appears in both Lives, thereby bringing to light the complex fgural play by which Plutarch enlivens familiar material and demonstrates his virtuosity as author.
    [Show full text]
  • The Predicament of Ignatius of Antioch by Stevan L
    THE PREDICAMENT OF IGNATIUS OF ANTIOCH BY STEVAN L. DAVIES Few members of the early church are as alive to us today as Ignatius of Antioch. In his vivid letters he presents himself and his faith to his contemporaries and to us. He is in great danger and urgently strives to send last instructions to his fellow Christians in Rome and Asia Minor. Although he is terribly uncertain about what will happen when he arrives in Rome, he seems quite certain of his present predicament. But what is that predicament and when did it occur? Ignatius' situation, which he presents so matter-of-factly, seems to make little sense in terms of Roman law. He writes that he is in chains, 'con- demned', and that, although firmly desiring to be thrown to wild beasts in Rome, he is afraid that the church in Rome will intervene and prevent his martyrdom. Samuel Laeuchli, in an essay on Ignatius, remarks that perhaps "Ignatius on that trip to Rome had lost full contact with his legal reality - which is one of the reasons why it has been impossible for scholar- ship to solve from his own words the puzzle of his condemnation and his ' extradition to Rome".1 While Ignatius' legal situation may have been unusual, it can make sense within the framework of Roman law and practice. It is generally assumed that there are but two possible explanations for Ignatius' journey to Rome. He might have been a Roman citizen traveling to Rome to appeal his condemnation to the Emperor or he might have been con- demned and sent as a donation to the Roman games by the Governor of Syria.
    [Show full text]
  • Imperium Romanum - Scenarios © 2018 Decision Games
    Imperium© 2018 DecisionRomanum Games - Scenarios 1 BX-U_ImperiumRom3-Scenarios_V4F.indd 1 10/10/18 10:38 AM # of Players No. Name Dates Period Max/Min/Opt. Page Number 1 The Gallic Revolt * Nov. 53 to Oct. 52 BC 1 2 4 2 Pompey vs. the Pirates * (1) Apr. to Oct. 67 BC 1 2 5 3 Marius vs. Sulla July 88 to Jan. 82 BC 1 4/3/3 6 4 The Great Mithridatic War June 75 to Oct. 72 BC 1 3 8 5 Crisis of the First Triumvirate Feb. 55 to Sep. 52 BC 1 6/4/5 10 6 Caesar vs. Pompey Nov. 50 to Aug. 48 BC 2 2 12 7 Caesar vs. the Sons of Pompey July 47 to May 45 BC 2 2 13 8 The Triumvirs vs. the Assassins Dec. 43 to Dec. 42 BC 2 2 15 9 Crisis of the Second Triumvirate Jan. 38 to Sep. 35 BC 2 5/3/4 16 10 Octavian vs. Antony & Cleopatra Apr. 32 to Aug. 30 BC 2 2 18 11 The Revolt of Herod Agrippa (1) AD March 45-?? 3 2 19 12 The Year of the Four Emperors AD Jan. 69 to Dec. 69 3 4/3/3 20 13 Trajan’s Conquest of Dacia * (1) AD Jan. 101 to Nov. 102 3 2 22 14 Trajan’s Parthian War (1) AD Jan. 115 to Aug. 117 3 2 23 15 Avidius Cassius vs. Pompeianus (1) AD June 175-?? 3 2 25 16 Septimius Severus vs. Pescennius Niger vs. AD Apr. 193 to Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading the Mausoleum of Augustus in Rome a Thesis
    READING THE MAUSOLEUM OF AUGUSTUS IN ROME A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY MERAL ÖZDENGİZ BAŞAK IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN THE DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY OF ARCHITECTURE FEBRUARY 2020 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences Prof. Dr. Yaşar Kondakçı Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts. Prof. Dr. Cânâ Bilsel Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Master of Arts. Prof. Dr. Suna Güven Supervisor Examining Committee Members Assist. Prof. Dr. Pelin Yoncacı Arslan (METU, AH) Prof. Dr. Suna Güven (METU, AH) Assist. Prof. Dr. İdil Üçer Karababa (İstanbul Bilgi Uni., IND) I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Meral Özdengiz Başak Signature : iii ABSTRACT READING THE MAUSOLEUM OF AUGUSTUS IN ROME ÖZDENGİZ BAŞAK, Meral M.A., Department of History of Architecture Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Suna GÜVEN February 2020, 199 pages This thesis focuses on the Mausoleum of the first Roman Emperor Augustus in Rome. It studies the Mausoleum as a Roman monument highly laden with symbolic meanings and functions.
    [Show full text]